I'm doing something new with movie reviews on my blog, covering movies based on HG Wells. My first entry is the most notorious, I think very underrated. I als
https://trendytroodon.blogspot.com/2021/04/space-1979-wells-thon-one-that-everyone.html
https://trendytroodon.blogspot.com/2021/04/space-1979-wells-thon-one-that-everyone.html
Arcane art appeals to me. For instance, Pendragon Pictures' product:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H._G._Wells%27_The_War_of_the_Worlds_(Pendragon_Pictures_film)
took precedence over Cruise's vehicle and Asylum's mockbuster back in
2005. (Both of the latter two picture products remain unviewed by me to
this day.)
Although it's interesting to watch a movie with a Wells character:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_After_Time_(1979_film)
it's more interesting for me to watch a Wellsian short story series with Wells appearing as a character in his own story:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Infinite_Worlds_of_H._G._Wells
David Brown <davidnbrown80@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm doing something new with movie reviews on my blog, covering movies based on HG Wells. My first entry is the most notorious, I think very underrated. I als
o tried to cover its relationship with the book and earlier movies.
https://trendytroodon.blogspot.com/2021/04/space-1979-wells-thon-one-that-everyone.html
Arcane art appeals to me. For instance, Pendragon Pictures' product:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H._G._Wells%27_The_War_of_the_Worlds_(Pendragon_Pictures_film)
took precedence over Cruise's vehicle and Asylum's mockbuster back in
2005. (Both of the latter two picture products remain unviewed by me to
this day.)
Although it's interesting to watch a movie with a Wells character:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_After_Time_(1979_film)
it's more interesting for me to watch a Wellsian short story series with >Wells appearing as a character in his own story:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Infinite_Worlds_of_H._G._Wells
Danke,
Don wrote:
https://trendytroodon.blogspot.com/2021/04/space-1979-wells-thon-one-that-everyone.html
Arcane art appeals to me. For instance, Pendragon Pictures' product:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H._G._Wells%27_The_War_of_the_Worlds_(Pendragon_Pictures_film)
took precedence over Cruise's vehicle and Asylum's mockbuster back in
2005. (Both of the latter two picture products remain unviewed by me to
this day.)
I caught the Cruise movie on TV, being interrupted by commercials sheared some pretentiousness off of it, and it was more modestly enjoyable.
Although it's interesting to watch a movie with a Wells character:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_After_Time_(1979_film)
it's more interesting for me to watch a Wellsian short story series with
Wells appearing as a character in his own story:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Infinite_Worlds_of_H._G._Wells
Wow! It's just about a year ago that I watched my copy of "Infinite Worlds." (you can guess why I had the time)
I remember finding the Wells-as-character parts unstructured, and being disappointed in the Wells adaptations. But maybe I'll have time to rewatch it next week if you post a review.
Interesting point you bring up about few recent adaptations of Wells. I could point to last years "The Invisible Man" but you could point back that it takes less from the novel than any recent Bond takes from Fleming's. I suppose any science fictionstory has a lifespan bounded by its predictions. "The First Men IN the Moon" (1964), like "20,000 Leagues Under the Sea" (1954) before it, had to move from present or near-future into Hidden History. "Things to Come" would need to be overhauled (like _
I suppose _The Time Machine_ and _The Invisible Man_, being essentially impossible, will never be caught up with. I guess for most of the other works, you are basically buying a recognized name, and maybe a bit of insurance against plagiarism lawsuits.(much the case with Verne's _Journey to the Center of the Earth_. Essentially impossible, and many adaptations of that title are really more Burrough's Pellucidar.)
Don wrote:
https://trendytroodon.blogspot.com/2021/04/space-1979-wells-thon-one-that-everyone.html
Arcane art appeals to me.
Just the other day I stumbled across a movie from Wells's book _The Passionate Friends_:
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0041735/
Made in 1949 from a 1913 novel; I wonder if there was any debate about whether to set it in the present or leave it in the past, as an early
example of steamrom. (Unfortunately, synchronicity had me watching the Hollywood movie "H.M. Pulham, Esq."(1941 and from a novel from the
previous year) along the same lines and which will probably be linked
with it forevermore.) Has anyone looked at Wells's other novels from
the viewpoint of a science fiction reader with the thesis that they
were written from the viewpoint of a science fiction author?
Although it's interesting to watch a movie with a Wells character:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_After_Time_(1979_film)
it's more interesting for me to watch a Wellsian short story series with
Wells appearing as a character in his own story:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Infinite_Worlds_of_H._G._Wells
Wow! It was just about a year ago that I watched my copy of "Infinite Worlds."
(you can guess why I had the time)
My memory is that I thought the Wells-as-character parts a bit unstructured, and was also somewhat disappointed by the Wells adaptations. I may have
time next week to watch it again.
A last comment on the sf.written front: while I can't recommend the movies "Empire of the Ants" or "Kingdom of the Spiders" as adaptations of their short stories, they did lead me to seek out those stories, and "Kingdom"
in particular is very haunting.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 296 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 67:24:55 |
Calls: | 6,654 |
Files: | 12,200 |
Messages: | 5,331,951 |