[continued from previous message]
philosophy human life is not absurd, because i say that happiness comes
from enjoying pleasures of life that we feel with our senses we humans,
and i am also defining the human sense as the one that comes from the
brain and from consciousness that gives pleasure, i mean
that when you are "learning" by looking at a video on youtube it can
give a pleasure inside your brain that comes from the brain and from consciousness, so when you are happiness by enjoying pleasures
of life with your human senses, you are enjoying life and you are
not thinking about the "absolute" meaning of human life, but the meaning
of human life becomes "relative", and since it becomes this relativeness
so human life becomes not absurd, since this enjoying pleasures of life
with our human senses is "like" a powerful "drug" that permit to be
happy and to not to be preoccupied with the absolute meaning of human
life that is talking about the philosopher Albert Camus.
More about my philosophy and about human existence..
I think that i am a philosopher that is smart, and now i will explain
more my philosophy so that you understand it:
Our era of globalization has been characterized by the democratization
of technology, democratization of finance, and democratization of
information, and from where do you think comes this progress ?
i think it comes from the "exponential" progress of our humanity, and
you have to understand this exponential progress of our humanity
correctly by reading my below thoughts, other than that i think that
those democratization of technology, democratization of finance, and democratization of information have like democratized
happiness too, i mean that before those democratizations brought
by the exponential progress of our humanity, Lower social class
and lower middle class had to be rich to be able to be happy,
because we were lacking technology and lacking tools that permit
to be happy without being rich, so this is why humanity was much more
violent because the not rich was violently fighting the rich etc. so we
had violent ideologies like communism and nazism etc. but i think that
today with the big advancement of technology and science etc. we are
able to be happy without being rich, and read my below thoughts to
understand how and to understand my philosophy about it, and read my
following thoughts about democratization of technology, democratization
of finance, and democratization of information so that you understand more:
And look at the following video:
Why Israel is a Tech Capital of the World
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RuPx61911Oo
I think that this jewish from Israel that is talking in the above video
is not thinking correctly, because there is two important things that
you must have so that a country be successful: Capital and talents, the
above video is making a mistake by saying that you need the two so that
to be successful, i mean it is saying that you need Capital and talents,
but i think he is making a mistake, because i think that Capital can
attract talents, so Capital can make you successful as a country, so
then i can logically infer that so that to have capital that make you successful, you have to know how to construct a product or services that
you can sell from those competitive advantages of competitive part or
parts of product or service that can come from you or/and can come from different countries of the global world, and it is i think an efficient
way that makes you adapt quickly and efficiently in this globalization,
and notice with me that having competitive part or parts of a product or service doesn't mean it has to come from R&D(Research and development),
also the above video of the jewish from Israel is not saying that
Capital can come from "democratization" of finance, since
you have to know that our global world has changed very much by being democratization of technology, democratization of finance, and
democratization of information, read my following thoughts so that you
also understand that Capital also comes from democratization of finance:
More about "democratization" of finance..
This "democratization" of finance is also for Research and Development
(R&D))..
And look at the following "democratization" of finance so that to
understand:
The 4 tools making capital more abundant than it’s ever been
Read more here:
https://singularityhub.com/2018/07/19/the-4-tools-making-capital-more-abundant-than-its-ever-been/
About democratization of digital technology and technology and Research
and Development (R&D) investment
This is also why i said the following:
Look at the following interesting video:
Can South Korea lead global innovation in Fourth Industrial Era?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XUw8gCShEcI
But i think that this minister of education, science and technology
of south Korea looks somewhat archaic since he is not taking correctly
into account the democratization of digital technology and Technology
that permits you to economically grow very rapidly and much cheaply than
using "expensive" Research and Development (R&D) investment, so i think
that he is not correctly adapting to the realities, because the economic realities have very much changed, since also our era of globalization
has been characterized by the democratization of technology,
democratization of finance, and democratization of information.
Here is more proof of what i am saying:
2. Question: What do you mean by “Democratizing Innovation”?
Eric von Hippel:
The tools for designing high-quality innovations are getting so cheap
and so ubiquitous that individuals can innovate for themselves at a
steadily higher quality and at a steadily decreasing cost. These
sophisticated modern tools are computer-based, and require relatively
little training and practice. As a result, even hobbyist users find they
can use them to design new products and services.
Read more here:
Democratizing Innovation: The Shift of Innovation to Users
https://www.ideaconnection.com/interviews/00010-Democratizing-Innovation-The-Shift-of-Innovation.html
More precision about more of my philosophy about indian meditation and
about my philosophy..
I invite you to look at the following video about indian meditation:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HHelfPFLXbs
I don't agree with indian meditation that wants us to stop seeking
pleasure of the senses, i think that indian meditation wants like
to solve the problem of materialism that causes problems such as
violence between the rich and not rich etc. but i think that my
philosophy is much better than indian meditation, so i invite
you to read it again carefully, and notice that the following
webpage is defining the human senses as the following:
The Five (and More) Senses
https://www.livescience.com/60752-human-senses.html
But i think that i am also defining the human sense as the one that
comes from the brain and from consciousness that gives pleasure, i mean
that when you are "learning" by looking at a video on youtube it can
give a pleasure inside your brain that comes from the brain and from consciousness.
So read my following philosophy that i think is much better than indian meditation:
Yet more philosophy about my philosophy..
I think that i am a philosopher that is smart, and i will ask
a question:
From where comes violence between peoples and between individuals ?
For example if a man has a big penis and another man has a small or
average penis they can get in violent fight between them because of this inequality.
Or if a man is rich and another man is not rich they can get into a
violent fight between them because of this inequality.
etc.
So now my philosophy is smart and it is saying that so that the rich
and the not rich not get into a violent fight because of inequality of
richness etc. we have to know from where "happiness" comes from and we
have to know that we can be happy without being rich by doing the
following, read my following thoughts to understand:
More philosophy about being materialistic and not being materialistic..
I will ask a smart question:
Am i a philosopher that is a materialistic ?
No, i am not materialistic , i am a philosopher that is seeking like a "balance" between being materialistic and not being materialistic , and
i am pragmatic, i will give you an example so that you understand my philosophy:
I think that looking at the videos of youtube is like being not
materialistic, since a video on youtube is like the immaterial, so then
you can enjoy those pleasures of life on internet by looking at the
videos of youtube or by reading facebook etc. by being not
materialistic, so then i am a philosopher that is convinced that we can
be happy even if we are not "rich", since with the sophistication of
internet and such tools, i say that we can be happy without being rich
by accessing internet and enjoying pleasures of life of internet and
such tools with a very low price, and what i predict that in about 10
years from now, and with the exponential progress of our humanity, we
will be happy and much more happy without being rich since this
exponential progress will provide us with much more powerful tools that
enhance much more the quality of our lives.
Read all my following my previous thoughts to understand more:
I think i am smart and i say that we have to be optimistic,
because happiness comes from enjoying pleasures of life that we feel
with our senses we humans, but my philosophy says that you can be happy
by not being rich and you can be happy by being rich, since notice
with me that today enjoying pleasures of life is also the fact that
we are accessing internet and taking advantage of looking at youtube or
reading facebook or searching and learning from Google etc. with a very
low price, and computers today cost a low price too, so i think that
we are being much more happy by enjoying those pleasures of life by
accessing internet at a very low price, this is why i think that
the exponential progress of our humanity will very soon, and in about 10
years from now, enhance much much more our lives by providing us
with very sophisticated tools, but we have to know how to manage this exponential progress of our humanity and we have also to be efficiently educated so that to be much better humans and so that Democracy works correctly, so this is why you have to take into account this exponential progress of our humanity, and read all my following thoughts to
understand better:
More of my philosophy about Eric Schmidt and about quantum computing and
about Moore's law..
I invite you to look carefully at this interesting Eric Schmidt's video:
Read about Eric Schmidt here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Schmidt
So look at his following video:
Eric Schmidt on the Early Strategic Decisions & Future of Quantum Computing
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wjG1fl6Ezdg
But in the video above i don't agree with Eric Schmidt about the end of
Moore's law, because look at the following discovery below that will
permit computers and phones to run thousands of times faster, so read
carefully my following thoughts to understand:
More of my philosophy about the exponential progress of our humanity..
I think that the white supremacists and neo-nazis and many humans are
not understanding correctly the exponential progress of our
humanity, so notice in my following news that the exponential progress
of our humanity is now going much faster and faster, so look for example
at the new discovery below that will permit computers and phones to run thousands of times faster, so you are noticing that it will make
artificial intelligence and such be much more powerful, so i think we
will soon be able to enhance much more our human genetics and we will
be able to do much more than that because the exponential progress of
our humanity will make us soon really much much more powerful, so we
have to be much more optimistic, so you have to read my following
thoughts below about the exponential progress of our humanity and you
have to read my following news below:
More political philosophy about: Are humans smart ?
So are humans smart ?
I am very positive about humans, and i think that humans are smart,
since we are also advancing by the following process of Swarm
Intelligence that is so efficient, read about it here:
How Swarm Intelligence Is Making Simple Tech Much Smarter
https://singularityhub.com/2018/02/08/how-swarm-intelligence-is-making-simple-tech-much-smarter/
So i think that "collectively", we humans, we are smart, and i think
that you will soon notice it by the following exponential progress of
our humanity, read about in my following thoughts:
More political philosophy about do we have to be pessimistic..
I think it is a beautiful day in history, and how can you understand it ?
First you will notice that the exponential progress of our humanity is
going very fast and is going faster and faster , look at the following
video to understand it:
Exponential Progress: Can We Expect Mind-Blowing Changes In The Near Future
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfM5HXpfnJQ&t=144s
So as you are noticing that you have to take this exponential progress
of our humanity into account and be much more optimistic.
And you have to know that this exponential progress of our humanity also
comes from the following process:
How Swarm Intelligence Is Making Simple Tech Much Smarter
https://singularityhub.com/2018/02/08/how-swarm-intelligence-is-making-simple-tech-much-smarter/
And here is my new poem called: "This beautiful exponential progress is
not a distress"
--
This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress
Because it is a beautiful maturity but not the adolescence
This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress
And we have to beautifully tune it with the beautiful consensus
This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress
So let us not be just guesses but technicality and science
This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress
So let us be a beautiful expressiveness that is not helpless
This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress
So let us take together this beautiful breakfast
This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress
Since you are also like my so beautiful Princess
This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress
So let us be a beautiful presence for present and future acceptance
--
Read my following news:
With the following new discovery computers and phones could run
thousands of times faster..
Prof Alan Dalton in the School of Mathematical and Physics Sciences at
the University of Sussex, said:
"We're mechanically creating kinks in a layer of graphene. It's a bit
like nano-origami.
"Using these nanomaterials will make our computer chips smaller and
faster. It is absolutely critical that this happens as computer
manufacturers are now at the limit of what they can do with traditional semiconducting technology. Ultimately, this will make our computers and
phones thousands of times faster in the future.
"This kind of technology -- "straintronics" using nanomaterials as
opposed to electronics -- allows space for more chips inside any device. Everything we want to do with computers -- to speed them up -- can be
done by crinkling graphene like this."
Dr Manoj Tripathi, Research Fellow in Nano-structured Materials at the University of Sussex and lead author on the paper, said:
"Instead of having to add foreign materials into a device, we've shown
we can create structures from graphene and other 2D materials simply by
adding deliberate kinks into the structure. By making this sort of
corrugation we can create a smart electronic component, like a
transistor, or a logic gate."
The development is a greener, more sustainable technology. Because no additional materials need to be added, and because this process works at
room temperature rather than high temperature, it uses less energy to
create.
Read more here:
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/02/210216100141.htm
More philosophy about how to be successful..
I have talked more about how to be successful(read my thoughts below
about it), but i think that you have to know about the ingredients that
bring success, and the most important ingredients that bring success is
to find the engines that push us forward towards more and more
perfection, and notice that if you say to people to work better and to
study better, it is not the way, since you have to tell wich engines
push us forward towards more and more perfection, for example
one very important engine that pushes us forward towards more and more perfection is to have the "positive spirit" so that to successful, so
when a people have the tendency to have a positive spirit , it is a kind
of positive energy that pushes us forward towards more and more
perfection, so it is also an engine, so when you are smart you will
notice that you have to find what are the engines that push us
forward towards more and more perfection because it is so important,
for example there is other engines that push us forward towards
more and more perfection and here is some of my philosophical thoughts
about morality that talk about them, here they are, and read them carefully:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/7UmkfURwoU4
Also read here my other thoughts of my philosophy that talks about other engines that push us forward towards more and more perfection:
https://scalable68.godaddysites.com/f/my-philosophy-about-human-existence
So as you are noticing by reading my philosophy that it is
a smart way of doing..
More philosophy about what is a language and what is a human meaning..
I think i am a philosopher and i will talk today about what is a
language and what is a human meaning:
So as you have just noticed i have just posted yesterday a new proverb
about what is a language etc.(read below about it), but you will notice
that there is many languages like the language of Love and language of technicality and the english language etc. but what is more important is
the meaning behind the language, since i think that the meaning precedes
the language, so this meaning behind the language is what makes us
conscious about ourselves and about life, so we can go further and
ask a philosophical question of what is this meaning behind the
language? i think that humans come with there feelings with there human
senses, and those feelings is what gives also joy and happiness to
humans, and feelings with our human senses is also part of the "set"
that we call meaning of the language, since we are feeling what is time,
like for example this comes before this or this comes after that, and
this also permits us to understand logic and fuzzy logic, also we are
feeling with our human senses what is space and matter and this permits
us to understand much more clearly what is a human body and what is
life, and i think that our feelings with our human senses are what
gives consciousness, so i think that our kind of human consciousness is
also partly biologic that comes from our human senses, so i think
this is the main part that permits our smartness to be effective
in an open system and it permits also to use much less data than
artificial intelligence (AI), so i think that it is not like deep
learning and AI.
More philosophy about what is a language and about my new proverbs..
As you have just noticed i have just written a new proverb
and here is my new proverb:
"One very important sign of a wise man is that he knows how to use the appropriate language to talk to people, but does he needs to use only
one language with "people"? no, he has to know how to use different
languages to talk to people, for example when he talks to the birds he
uses the language of the birds, so he has to know how to be efficient at
that."
So notice that it is a smart proverb, since i am also saying in my new
proverb the following:
"..for example when he talks to the birds he uses the language of the
birds.."
So as you notice that it is also making it clear that a language
is not only like the spoken english language, since it can also mean the language of the heart(or of Love) or the language of technicality etc."
And here is my other new proverbs, read them carefully:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/FPdu0B9_Vlc
And here is my new poems of Love that use smartly the language of the
heart(or of Love):
About Van Morrison and my poems of Love..
I invite you to listen to the following one of the best music of Van
Morrison, since i am also a musician and i know what is music..
Van Morrison - Caledonia Soul Music
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1ecN3rOoFQ
And i invite you to read at the same time my following
poems of Love:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/IkAbxVqWD8M
Here is what my political philosophy says about Democracy..
More political philosophy about Democracy and Morality..
I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have also invented
many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
And now i will start by asking a philosophical question:
Is Democracy morality ?
I will say that Morality is about exactness and how to be the exact
perfection, note that the English dictionary defines "perfection" as:
"the act or process of perfecting", read here to notice it:
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perfection
And Democracy is a mechanism that permits to avoid corruption of
morality and corruption of morality is also lack of efficiency and it is extremism that hurts Democracy, and Democracy doesn't mean that people
have to govern, because it is absurdity, but Democracy is the "tool" of Morality, since morality wants to be the exact perfection , this is why
it needs Democracy, and Morality or society have to be "progressive",
read my following writing of my political philosophy about morality to
know that they have to be progressive:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/7UmkfURwoU4
And we can say the following:
The classical notion of decentralization does not necessarily imply
democracy, and an organization may be decentralized without being based
on democratic principles.
But i ask a smart question of:
Can we say that an organization based on democratic principles may be centralized ?
Here is my answer:
But we can notice that even though decentralization doesn't necessarily
imply Democracy, Democracy is a "kind" of decentralization, and this
kind of decentralization brings efficiency because we can notice that
Democracy needs requirements such as competitive elections and free
press, and i think that Democracy is more efficient than Dictatorship at fighting corruption(and corruption can mean lack of efficiency), read
my following thoughts about Democracy and more to understand:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Nudyb_4QCRU
More political philosophy about Democracy and parliamentary Democracy..
Wich is better, Democracy or parliamentary Democracy ?
When you are smart you will notice that parliamentary Democracy is
better since Democracy means that the people "govern", but this way of
doing brings desorder, since people doesn't mean that it is Elites that govern, so this is why i think that it is inherent to parliamentary
democracy that it is the Elites that govern and guide people, since
also we can logically prove it by saying the following:
From where people get a correct judgment in Democracy ?
So you are noticing that to be able to be good judgment in Democracy,
you have to be correct "Elitism" that guides people, and you have to be Meritocracy to be able to be the necessary quality or perfection, but
then you are noticing that to be able to be Meritocracy there must be a
reward for the merit, by for example rewarding by giving more money.
But since i am smart i will ask another important philosophical
question, and it is the following:
Does parliamentary democracy has requirements, and wich requirements it has:
From my above logical proof we can say that the first requirement of parliamentary democracy is: it is the Elites that must govern and guide people, and from the first requirement we can logically infer that the
Elites must be competent, so we can logically infer the since they have
to be competent so then we can say the the second requirement of
parliamentary democracy that it must be meritocratic, and the third
requirement of parliamentary democracy is also an important requirement
and it is that we have to have a constitution that says that
parliamentary democracy has to have law enforcement agencies like the
USA FBI and military as necessary basic requirements for a country, and
a country can become a more global world like European union or such.
More political philosophy about the mechanisms of Democracy..
I think that we have to be smart, since i have just written the
following about China and Russia of year 2010 and 2012:
----
More about China and Russia and other such countries education system..
I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many
scalable algorithms, read the following:
“Corruption is pervasive in every part of Chinese society, and education
is no exception,” Mr. Li said.
A Chinese Education, for a Price
Read more here:
https://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/22/world/asia/in-china-schools-a-culture-of-bribery-spreads.html
I think we can not be confident with the Chinese education system, and i
don't think it is meritocratic !
It is the same problem in Russia, read the following to notice it:
Mark Levin, a professor at the Higher School of Economics in Moscow who
has studied the issue, said corruption in universities took place not
only during the entrance examinations but also those at the end of
semesters. Levin said some students preferred to pay money to pass
examinations and obtain a diploma.
RUSSIA: Rising corruption threatens universities
Read more here:
https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20100514205552600#:~:text=According%20to%20necessarily%20rough%20estimates,in%202009%20totalled%20%241%20billion.&text=But%2C%20despite%20the%20country's%20increased,much%20the%20salaries%20actually%
20are.
----
And also i have just posted about the today China after the
anti-corruption compaign in China, read the following:
---
I invite you to read the following interesting article:
China’s Anti-Corruption Campaign and the Challenges of Political Meritocracy
https://americanaffairsjournal.org/2020/05/chinas-anti-corruption-campaign-and-the-challenges-of-political-meritocracy/
---
So as you are noticing from my above writing that corruption can corrupt
the education system and when education system is corrupt then the
Meritocratic system is corrupt and this is dangerous. So even after the anti-corruption compaign in China , i think that Dictatorship of China
is not so efficient at fighting corruption, because Democracy is much
better at fighting corruption by competitive elections and free press,
read my following thoughts to understand more:
From where people get a correct judgment in Democracy ?
So you are noticing that to be able to be good judgment in Democracy,
you have to be correct "Elitism" that guides people, and you have to be Meritocracy to be able to be the necessary quality or pe