• More philosophy about the invisible hand and regulation of Adam Smith p

    From World90@21:1/5 to All on Mon May 17 09:50:36 2021
    Hello..


    More philosophy about the invisible hand and regulation of Adam Smith philosophy..

    I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
    invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

    I invite you to read the following about Adam Smith philosophy:

    The Role of Self-Interest and Competition in a Market Economy

    https://www.stlouisfed.org/education/economic-lowdown-podcast-series/episode-3-the-role-of-self-interest-and-competition-in-a-market-economy

    So as you are noticing that the philosopher and economist Adam Smith has brought his philosophy of economic Liberalism, but notice in the above
    webpage that Adam Smith described the opposing, but complementary forces
    of self-interest and competition as the invisible hand, it means that
    while producers and consumers are not acting with the intent of serving
    the needs of others or society, they do, since when you work, your goal
    is to earn money, but in the process you provide a valuable good or
    service that benefits others and society, so it is the basis
    of the following saying of Adam Smith: "Human egoism is the engine of
    the properity and happiness of nations", but i think i am a philosopher
    and i don't agree with Adam Smith philosophy since we can notice
    that we even need economic actors that share ideas across nations and industries(and that needs the globalization phenomenon) that make us
    much more creative and that's good for economy, so this shows
    that my new way of my philosophy that i call Coopetition is required, so
    i invite you to read about it in my below thoughts and writing:

    More philosophy about economic Liberalism and about our world..

    I think i am a philosopher and i will invite you to look at the
    following video:

    L'EFFONDREMENT POLITIQUE QUI VIENT

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jJVbSHdttbY


    I think that the above video is too pessimistic, but i am a philosopher
    that is optimistic, since i think that social-liberalism of President
    Emmanuel Macron government and of the Democrats in USA must be
    understood more, and what i really mean is that the economic Liberalism
    of social-liberalism is understanding the benefits of economic
    cooperation and collaboration, so in reality we can say that the actors
    in economy are not just actors of economic Liberalism that believe in
    Adam Smith philosophy about economy of: "Human egoism is the engine of
    the properity and happiness of nations", so then notice that in reality
    there is like a tendency of seeking like a balance between cooperation
    or collaboration and competition and its egoism, so you can quickly
    notice it by the fact that today there is also economic actors like of
    Open source hardwares(like with the Open source Risc) and of Open source
    or free softwares and of actors that share ideas across nations and industries(and that needs the globalization phenomenon) that make us
    much more creative and that's good for economy, so i am also very
    optimistic about our world, since our humanity is progressing in an
    exponential way, and data and information in internet is growing in an exponential way, and our era of globalization has been characterized by
    the democratization of technology, democratization of finance, and democratization of information, and economies of scale resulted in the
    most affordable price of any product for the consumer without the
    manufacturer having to sacrifice profits(and this economies of scale
    needs globalization too) etc., so i think our world is becoming much
    more powerful and efficient.

    More philosophy about Adam Smith and about Liberalism..

    I think i am a philosopher and i will talk more about my philosophy:

    I invite you to read the following about Emmanuel Macron's initial
    political positions:

    https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Ffr.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FPositions_politiques_d%2527Emmanuel_Macron

    So as you notice that Emmanuel Macron is a social-liberal like the
    american Democrats in USA, so notice that they believe in economic
    Liberalism of the philosopher and economist Adam Smith that said about
    economy the following:

    "Human egoism is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations"

    So Adam Smith justifies the pursuit of self-interest and egoism in
    economy, but i think i am a sophisticated philosopher and i don't
    agree with Adam Smith, since my new way of doing in economy is called Coopetition not Liberalism, my new way of doing is called Coopetition
    since it seeks like a balance between cooperation (or collaboration) and competition, so i am taking the first four letters of cooperation and i
    am taking the six last letters of competition and both
    of them compose the name of my new way of doing in economy that is
    called Coopetition, since i also think that Liberalism is too much
    violence since it is based on competition and egoism, so i think that my Coopetition is the right balance that avoids this too much violence of Liberalism, also i think that my Coopetition is more efficient for
    creativity, innovation, adaptability and speed of progress, and
    here is also how i am explaining it:

    More of my philosophy about egoism and competition and collaboration and cooperation..

    I invite you to look at the following video:

    Why is Communism So Appealing?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_0UAsaqaOc

    I am not a communist, my political philosophy is different,
    and i think my philosophy is better, and i am explaining it in
    my below thoughts, i think that the philosophy of the philosopher and
    economist Adam Smith was lacking on efficiency, since he said that
    "Human egoism is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations"
    and i think it is not true, simply because creativity and innovation
    come not only from competition and its egoism, but they also come from
    ideas circulating and combining across nations and industries(so they
    need globalization), but egoism of competition is too much extremism
    that hurts because it has also the tendency to make ideas not
    circulating and combining efficiently across nations and industries, so
    my philosophy says that we have to seek like a balance between
    competition and collaboration or cooperation, and this needs also
    collaboration and cooperation by sharing ideas and sharing knowledge and sharing PhD papers and sharing open source softwares etc. and here is my
    new philosophy and model, read it carefully in my following thoughts:

    More philosophy about the Scottish and economist and philosopher called
    Adam Smith..

    I invite you to look at the following video about Adam Smith:

    ADAM SMITH - La main invisible

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OIvtWvDkkVk

    You can read about Adam Smith here:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Smith

    I think that i am a philosopher that is smart, and i say that
    the philosopher and economist Adam Smith was not right by saying the following(you
    can listen to it in the above video):

    "Human egoism is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations"

    I think that Adam Smith is not right by saying so, since my new
    philosophy and model says that you have to seek like a balance between collaboration or cooperation and competition(and egoism comes
    from competition), my philosophy says that innovation and creativity
    not only come from competition but it also come from ideas circulating
    and combining across nations and industries(so they need globalization),
    so in my philosophy creativity and innovation needs also collaboration
    and cooperation by sharing ideas and sharing knowledge and sharing PhD
    papers and sharing open source softwares etc. and here is my new
    philosophy and model:

    My today talk is about white supremacism and neo-nazism and the
    far-right and nationalism.

    So the first philosophical question is how to talk about
    those above ideologies?

    I think that it is also like a Mensa IQ test, so since i think i am
    smart, i have to use my smartness to solve the Mensa IQ test, so when
    you are smart, so how can you solve the problem(that is like a Mensa IQ
    test) of those above ideologies ? i think that i have first to detect
    the important pattern with my fluid intelligence, and i have to see
    clearly the pattern(like for example getting into the details from the abstraction of the pattern), and the important pattern is the following:

    Notice that it is like an optimization problem of artificial
    intelligence that looks like PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization), it is
    what we call Swarm intelligence, and in PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization)
    there is what we call local optimization that we call exploitation, and
    there is what we call global optimization that we call exploration(read
    about PSO in my thoughts below so that to understand), so if PSO is not balanced correctly with exploitation and exploration it can not converge
    to the global optimum, we say that PSO has to guarantee the optimal convergence, so if it is not correctly balanced with both exploitation
    and exploration it can get stuck in a local maximum and not to converge
    to global optimum, so then notice that with logical analogy, exploration
    and exploitation of PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization) is in philosophy
    like seeking the right balance between individualism and collectivism
    that guarantees the optimal convergence like in PSO, or it is like
    seeking the right balance between collaboration and competition that
    guarantees the optimal convergence like in PSO, so then since the above ideologies are nationalism and nationalism is too much local
    optimization and lack of global optimization , it is too much
    competition and lack of collaboration or cooperation, so it is by
    logical analogy like too much exploitation and lack of exploration in
    PSO, so this is not good and here is how to notice it , read the following:

    Read the following article about economic nationalism:

    Rise of Economic Nationalism and Its Implications

    https://www.lewisu.edu/experts/wordpress/index.php/rise-of-economic-nationalism-and-its-implications/


    Notice that it says the following:


    "Countries benefit with cooperation between countries to mutual benefit, becoming too nationalistic at the expense of its partners is
    counterproductive. It is an approach that creates conflict. Being more nationalistic tends to be a zero sum game in an increasingly
    interdependent world economy, where countries depend on other countries
    for their economic and political and national security well being. When companies cooperate, they can become more competitive. When they are
    more competitive, they hire more workers, pay higher salaries, and
    otherwise contribute to economic growth. Economic nationalism is a bad
    policy."

    So a you are noticing that nationalism is not the right way to do.

    This is why i also said the following:

    More political philosophy about globalization and nationalism..

    I am a white arab and i think i am more smart, so today i will
    talk about a very important subject about Globalization and nationalism,
    so i will invite you to look at the following video of Marine Le Pen of
    the far-right political party in France:

    Marine Le Pen explains why nationalism is important

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNpI9wKnE8Q

    As you notice that Marine Le Pen is saying in french that the
    fight today is between nationalism and globalization, since
    Marine Le Pen says that globalization is a treat to national
    identity and is a treat to national sovereignty, but i think that Marine
    Le Pen is not understanding correctly globalization, since i think that nationalism is too much competition and communism and socialism is too
    much collaboration , so i think the best way is to seek like a balance
    between collaboration and competition and when we look
    at globalization you will notice that we are collaborating with others
    by for example sharing Open Source softwares or Free softwares or PhD
    papers or knowledge on internet etc, and we are also competition by not collaborating with others, and with this new kind of model we are
    noticing that we are not just one identity like being french, but we are becoming multiple identities because this kind of new model is making a
    part of us that collaborate "universal", and this is why i think that
    Marine Le Pen is not understanding correctly this new kind of model of
    like seeking a balance between competition and collaboration , and i
    think that this new model is better because it is more efficient ,
    because i think this partly collaboration of this new model is good and
    more efficient for creativity, innovation, adaptability and speed of
    progress, i also think in capitalism the price of internet has gotten
    cheap and the price of computers has gotten cheap, so we are able today
    to access internet with a low price and benefit from "collaboration" and
    also sharing in internet, for example look at me, i have invented many
    scalable algorithms and i have decided to share some of them with the
    others, and it is of course collaboration , so look for example at my
    following inventions of scalable algorithms that i have shared with
    others, here they are:

    https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-mlock

    https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references

    https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-rwlock

    https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-rwlock-that-works-accross-processes-and-threads

    https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.programming.threads/VaOo1WVACgs

    https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/an-efficient-threadpool-engine-with-priorities-that-scales-very-well

    Also i have decided to not share others of my scalable algorithms and it
    is competition, so i am seeking like a balance between collaboration and competition.

    I invite you to read the following interesting article:

    Collective intelligence is the root of human progress

    https://singularityhub.com/2017/10/16/collective-intelligence-is-at-the-root-of-human-progress/

    And i invite you to read my thoughts of my philosophy here:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YZSYxV41-qI

    And i invite you to read more of my thoughts of my philosophy here:

    https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/OjDTCDiawJw

    Yet more precision about more philosophy of where is Love ?

    I think i am smart and i say that we are constructing Love,
    look at the fact that economies of scale resulted in the most affordable
    price of any product for the consumer without the manufacturer having to sacrifice profits, it is also Love, and economies of scale have
    permitted great things, since they permit you to become much more
    powerful and they also permit you to become rich or immaterially rich,
    since look also how the price of accessing internet has become very low,
    this has permitted you to access youtube and learn from youtube and from internet at a very low price, and it is a great thing that has happened
    to humanity, since i think that internet is by analogy like multitasking
    and interaction of many many human brains that resulted or results in
    something really big and really great, so internet also contains the
    smartness of many many brains and internet contains a lot of data and
    data of internet is growing exponentially and it is good for artificial intelligence, and you have to know how to be selective by efficiently
    using the right tools so that to search efficiently internet and so that
    to learn from it. But you have also to know more about education and the
    forms of human communication, so i I think that our societies are
    experiencing many changes, among the many changes is that we are using multimedia way of communicating like youtube, but if you notice
    carefully this way of such youtube way is a form of human communication
    that looks like an oral tradition that lacks good and precise thinking
    and precise writing, so i think that we have to be careful since i think
    that we have to "master" more the way of good and precise thinking
    and precise writing so that to adapt correctly and efficiently,
    so there is a "distinction" to be made about the form of human
    communication, since i think that the form of good and precise thinking
    and precise writing by also using hypertext and hyperlinks is the way to
    go. So notice below how i am thinking and writing my philosophy with
    a much more efficient way of doing since it is technical and it is a
    much more efficient and precise way of thinking and writing. This is why
    i have also just said the following:

    More of my philosophy about the hyperlink and hypertext revolution and
    the web..

    I think the best things that have happened to internet is
    the exponential growth of data and information on internet(and it is
    good for artificial intelligence) and the how it is organized
    efficiently, i mean this hypertext and hyperlink way of organizing
    information on internet is "so" powerful and i think it is what have revolutionized internet, here is the definition of hyperlink:

    "A hyperlink is a word, phrase, or image that you can click on to jump
    to a new document or a new section within the current document.
    Hyperlinks are found in nearly all Web pages, allowing users to click
    their way from page to page."

    So this is why you have to be optimistic since i am also organizing my
    thoughts of my philosophy and political philosophy more efficiently in
    an hyperlink way too, but i will organize them much more efficiently as
    a pdf and html book and you will be able to download them from my website.

    So i am very optimistic about our world, since our humanity is
    progressing in an exponential way, and data and information in internet
    is growing in an exponential way, and our era of globalization has been characterized by the democratization of technology, democratization of
    finance, and democratization of information, and economies of scale
    resulted in the most affordable price of any product for the consumer
    without the manufacturer having to sacrifice profits(and this economies
    of scale needs globalization too) etc., so i think our world is becoming
    much more powerful and efficient.

    More philosophy about Economics and scalability and productivity and
    quality..

    I invite you to read the following interesting paper because it is
    so important:

    Tipping the scales in AI: How leaders capture exponential returns

    https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/technology-media-and-telecommunications/our-insights/tipping-the-scales-in-ai

    I have just read the above paper and i have understood it and i will
    talk more about something really important: In economics, economies of
    scale resulted in the most affordable price of any product for the
    consumer without the manufacturer having to sacrifice profits, and in Microeconomics there is a so important thing that we call Diminishing
    Marginal Returns in Economies of Scale, and it is a so much important
    thing, since the most important in it is that you have to know how to
    "avoid" this Diminishing Marginal Returns in Economies of Scale, and i
    have invented sophisticated tools to do it, also i have invented
    many many scalable algorithms and algorithms and i am still inventing
    scalable algorithms and algorithms and i am also inventing other
    sophisticated software tools and softwares.

    You can read more about Diminishing Marginal Returns in Economies of
    Scale here:

    Economies of Scale

    https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-microeconomics/chapter/economies-of-scale/

    Also there is a so much important thing that we call "scalability",
    and in economy you have to know how to "scale" efficiently productivity,
    but you have to scale efficiently productivity by avoiding the above
    problem of Diminishing Marginal Returns in Economies of Scale, and here
    is what i am a saying about the scalability of productivity:

    I have also just posted about the following thoughts from the following
    PhD computer scientist:

    https://lemire.me/blog/about-me/

    Read more here his thoughts about productivity:

    https://lemire.me/blog/2012/10/15/you-cannot-scale-creativity/

    And i think he is making a mistake:

    Since we have that Productivity = Output/Input

    But better human training and/or better tools and/or better human
    smartness and/or better human capacity can make the Parallel
    productivity part much bigger that the Serial productivity part, so it
    can scale much more (it is like Gustafson's Law).

    And it looks like the following:

    About parallelism and about Gustafson’s Law..

    Gustafson’s Law:


    • If you increase the amount of work done by each parallel
    task then the serial component will not dominate
    • Increase the problem size to maintain scaling
    • Can do this by adding extra complexity or increasing the overall
    problem size

    Scaling is important, as the more a code scales the larger a machine it
    can take advantage of:

    • can consider weak and strong scaling
    • in practice, overheads limit the scalability of real parallel programs
    • Amdahl’s law models these in terms of serial and parallel fractions
    • larger problems generally scale better: Gustafson’s law

    Load balance is also a crucial factor.

    So read my following thoughts about the Threadpool to notice that my
    Threadpool that scales very well does Load balance well:


    About the Threadpool..


    I have just read the following:


    Concurrency - Throttling Concurrency in the CLR 4.0 ThreadPool


    https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/archive/msdn-magazine/2010/september/concurrency-throttling-concurrency-in-the-clr-4-0-threadpool


    But i think that both the methodologies from Microsoft of the Hill
    Climbing and of the Control Theory using band pass filter or match
    filter and discrete Fourier transform have a weakness, there weakness is
    that they are "localized" optimization that maximize the throughput , so
    they are not fair, so i don't think i will implement them, so then you
    can use my following invention of an efficient Threadpool engine with priorities that scales very well (and you can use a second Threadpool
    for IO etc.):

    https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/an-efficient-threadpool-engine-with-priorities-that-scales-very-well

    And here is my other Threadpool engine with priorities:

    https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/threadpool-engine-with-priorities

    And read my following previous thoughts to understand more:

    About the strategy of "work depth-first; steal breadth-first"..

    I have just read the following webpage:

    Why Too Many Threads Hurts Performance, and What to do About It

    https://www.codeguru.com/cpp/sample_chapter/article.php/c13533/Why-Too-Many-Threads-Hurts-Performance-and-What-to-do-About-It.htm

    Also I have just looked at the following interesting video about Go
    scheduler and Go concurrency:

    Dmitry Vyukov — Go scheduler: Implementing language with lightweight concurrency

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-K11rY57K7k

    And i have just read the following webpage about the Threadpool of
    microsoft .NET 4.0:


    https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/jennifer/2009/06/26/work-stealing-in-net-4-0/

    And as you are noticing the first web link above is speaking about the
    strategy of "work depth-first; steal breadth-first" , but we have to be
    more smart because i think that this strategy, that is advantageous for
    cache locality, works best for recursive algorithms, because a thread is
    taking the first task and after that the algorithm is recursive, so it
    will put the childs tasks inside the local work-stealing queue, and the
    other threads will start to take from the work-stealing queue, so the
    work will be distributed correctly, but as you will notice that this
    strategy works best for recursive algorithms, but when you you
    iteratively start many tasks, i think we will have much more contention
    on the work-stealing queue and this is a weakness of this strategy,
    other than that when it is not a recursive algorithm and the threads are receiving from the global queue so there will be high contention on the
    global queue and this is not good. MIT's Cilk and Go scheduler and the Threadpool of Microsoft and Intel® C++ TBB are using this strategy of
    "work depth-first; steal breadth-first". And as you are noticing that
    they are giving more preference to cache locality than scalability.

    But in my following invention of a Threadpool that scales very well i am
    giving more preference to scalability than to cache locality:

    https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/an-efficient-threadpool-engine-with-priorities-that-scales-very-well

    Other than that when you are doing IO with my Threadpool, you can use asychronous IO by starting a dedicated thread to IO to be more
    efficient, or you can start another of my Threadpool and use it for
    tasks that uses IO, you can use the same method when threads of the my Threadpool are waiting or sleeping..

    Other than that for recursion and the stack overflow problem you can
    convert your function from a recursive to iterative to solve the problem
    of stack overflow.

    Other than that to be able to serve a great number of internet
    connections or TCP/IP socket connections you can use my Threadpool with
    my powerful Object oriented Stackful coroutines library for Delphi and FreePascal here:

    https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/object-oriented-stackful-coroutines-library-for-delphi-and-freepascal

    And enhancing productivity is also related to my following powerful
    product that i have designed and implemented(that can also be applied to organizations):

    https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/universal-scalability-law-for-delphi-and-freepascal

    Please read the following about Applying the Universal Scalability Law
    to organisations:

    https://blog.acolyer.org/2015/04/29/applying-the-universal-scalability-law-to-organisations/

    And you can read more about my thoughts here:

    https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/OjDTCDiawJw

    And I invite you to read the following article:

    The Secret Behind Silicon Valley’s Enduring Success

    https://singularityhub.com/2012/07/12/the-real-secret-behind-silicon-valleys-success/

    And i have just detected with my smartness the pattern in the above
    article, and it is that success of a country comes from: A good
    education system and from talents and from capital and from from
    attracting the smartest immigrants.

    But i think i am smart and i have to be fine-grained and show you more
    the important details, so read my following thoughts so that to understand:

    And look at the following video:

    Why Israel is a Tech Capital of the World

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RuPx61911Oo

    I think that this jewish from Israel that is talking in the above video
    is not thinking correctly, because there is two important things that
    you must have so that a country be successful: Capital and talents, the
    above video is making a mistake by saying that you need the two so that
    to be successful, i mean it is saying that you need Capital and talents,
    but i think he is making a mistake, because i think that Capital can
    attract talents, so Capital can make you successful as a country, so
    then i can logically infer that so that to have capital that make you successful, you have to know how to construct a product or services that
    you can sell from those competitive advantages of competitive part or
    parts of product or service that can come from you or/and can come from different countries of the global world, and it is i think an efficient
    way that makes you adapt quickly and efficiently in this globalization,
    and notice with me that having competitive part or parts of a product or service doesn't mean it has to come from R&D(Research and development),
    also the above video of the jewish from Israel is not saying that
    Capital can come from "democratization" of finance, since
    you have to know that our global world has changed very much by being democratization of technology, democratization of finance, and
    democratization of information, read my following thoughts so that you
    also understand that Capital also comes from democratization of finance:

    More about "democratization" of finance..

    This "democratization" of finance is also for Research and Development
    (R&D))..

    And look at the following "democratization" of finance so that to
    understand:

    The 4 tools making capital more abundant than it’s ever been

    Read more here:

    https://singularityhub.com/2018/07/19/the-4-tools-making-capital-more-abundant-than-its-ever-been/

    About democratization of digital technology and technology and Research
    and Development (R&D) investment

    This is also why i said the following:

    Look at the following interesting video:

    Can South Korea lead global innovation in Fourth Industrial Era?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XUw8gCShEcI

    But i think that this minister of education, science and technology
    of south Korea looks somewhat archaic since he is not taking correctly
    into account the democratization of digital technology and Technology
    that permits you to economically grow very rapidly and much cheaply than
    using "expensive" Research and Development (R&D) investment, so i think
    that he is not correctly adapting to the realities, because the economic realities have very much changed, since also our era of globalization
    has been characterized by the democratization of technology,
    democratization of finance, and democratization of information.

    Here is more proof of what i am saying:


    2. Question: What do you mean by “Democratizing Innovation”?

    Eric von Hippel:

    The tools for designing high-quality innovations are getting so cheap
    and so ubiquitous that individuals can innovate for themselves at a
    steadily higher quality and at a steadily decreasing cost. These
    sophisticated modern tools are computer-based, and require relatively
    little training and practice. As a result, even hobbyist users find they
    can use them to design new products and services.

    Read more here:

    Democratizing Innovation: The Shift of Innovation to Users

    https://www.ideaconnection.com/interviews/00010-Democratizing-Innovation-The-Shift-of-Innovation.html

    I have just talked before about the importance of the following
    statement in business:

    "The focus should be on the product, since if the product is good
    the profits will follow"

    But notice that it is saying that if the product is good then the
    profits will follow, so as you are noticing we have to define what
    is a good product ? and does a good product only comes from science or
    from engineering? not at all !, since the product can become good by the process of creativity, and then we have to define creativity, and
    creativity needs globalization, since creativity and innovation come
    from ideas circulating and combining across nations and industries, and
    i invite you to read about what is creativity in the following
    interesting web page from Yale university:

    What Is Creativity?

    https://insights.som.yale.edu/insights/what-is-creativity

    More philosophy about Canada and its education system..

    I am living in Canada since year 1989, and i think Canada is the best
    country in the world, and here is the logical proof of it: Read the
    following about Canada to notice it:

    Canada is the No. 1 Country in the World, According to the 2021 Best
    Countries Report

    https://www.usnews.com/info/blogs/press-room/articles/2021-04-13/canada-is-the-no-1-country-in-the-world-according-to-2021-best-countries

    And the education system of Canada is one of the best in the world, read
    the following to notice it:

    How Canada became an education superpower

    https://www.bbc.com/news/business-40708421

    And to know more about USA, read my following writing:

    More philosophy about USA and its education system..

    I invite you to look carefully at this 9 minutes video of Michio Kaku
    an American theoretical physicist, and he explains something really
    important to know about USA:

    Michio Kaku: US has the worst educational system known to science

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-fphPeRvhjQ

    Here is more proof, read my following writing about USA:

    Let's look for example at USA, so read the following from Jonathan Wai
    that is a Ph.D., it says:

    "Heiner Rindermann and James Thompson uncovered that the “smart

    [continued in next message]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)