[continued from previous message]
with Jean-Paul Sartre, since i say that we have not to loose our way in
the much less important details, and we have to know about the most
important goal, this is why i am explaining the following:
More political philosophy about: Are humans smart ?
So are humans smart ?
I am very positive about humans, and i think that humans are smart,
since we are also advancing by the following process of Swarm
Intelligence that is so efficient, read about it here:
How Swarm Intelligence Is Making Simple Tech Much Smarter
https://singularityhub.com/2018/02/08/how-swarm-intelligence-is-making-simple-tech-much-smarter/
So i think that "collectively", we humans, we are smart, and i think
that you will soon notice it by the following exponential progress of
our humanity, read about in my following thoughts:
More political philosophy about do we have to be pessimistic..
I think it is a beautiful day in history, and how can you understand it ?
First you will notice that the exponential progress of our humanity is
going very fast and is going faster and faster , look at the following
video to understand it:
Exponential Progress: Can We Expect Mind-Blowing Changes In The Near Future
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfM5HXpfnJQ&t=144s
So as you are noticing that you have to take this exponential progress
of our humanity into account and be much more optimistic.
And you have to know that this exponential progress of our humanity also
comes from the following process:
How Swarm Intelligence Is Making Simple Tech Much Smarter
https://singularityhub.com/2018/02/08/how-swarm-intelligence-is-making-simple-tech-much-smarter/
And here is my new poem about this exponential progress of our humanity
called : "This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress"
--
This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress
Because it is a beautiful maturity but not the adolescence
This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress
And we have to beautifully tune it with the beautiful consensus
This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress
So let us not be just guesses but technicality and science
This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress
So let us be a beautiful expressiveness that is not helpless
This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress
So let us take together this beautiful breakfast
This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress
Since you are also like my so beautiful Princess
This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress
So let us be a beautiful presence for present and future acceptance
--
More political philosophy about Algeria and such countries..
I invite you to look at this video:
Les raisons qui expliquent la cherté de la vie et dont personne n'en
parle en Algérie
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d6B8jPLXiNc
As you are noticing in the above video that countries such as Algeria
lacks organization, and you will quickly notice how high is the cost of
living in Algeria, so i am a philosopher and i will explain with my
smartness:
I think the best way is the following:
Economies of scale resulted in the most affordable price of any product
for the consumer without the manufacturer having to sacrifice profits.
But you have to be smart, since it is a level of abstraction of what
must happen in Algeria so that the cost of living drops, it is a level
of abstraction that needs more precision, and here is more precision
with my smartness:
Look at the following video of Peter Diamandis that has the positive
spirit that i am talking about in my thoughts below, so you have
to look at it carefully because it is speaking about one of
the most important thing that is exponential thinking and exponential
progress:
How to Think Bigger: Thinking Big and Bold | Peter Diamandis
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zAVxI5wWGKU
And read about Peter Diamandis here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Diamandis
So then this brings more pricision to the above level of abstraction
and it is that we have to think much Bigger and we have to think
exponentially and we have to think about our exponential progress
and this way makes us progress really fast, this is why i think that we
have not to be pessimistic about Algeria and such countries since i
think they will quickly know how to take advantage of this exponential
progress of our humanity.
More political philosophy about Ray Dalio and about happiness..
Read about Ray Dalio here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ray_Dalio
And look at the following video of him:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tw0wtyzW6nA
I think that Ray Dalio is not thinking correctly, since he speaks like
an economist and he is not a philosopher, and this way of doing is
lacking intelligence, so i will explain with my smartness:
Read the following about what is the Standard of living:
"Standard of living generally refers to wealth, comfort, material goods,
and necessities of certain classes in certain areas—or more objective characteristics—whereas quality of life is more subjective and
intangible, such as personal liberty or environmental quality."
So i think that Ray Dalio is making a "mistake" since the world has very
much changed and i think i am a philosopher and Ray Dalio is not
understanding correctly my philosophy: So in my philosophy i am talking
about how to be happiness and joy even if we are not the standard of
living of being highly wealthy etc. i mean even if we are also having a
problem with unequal distribution of income and opportunities because of globalization, i think we can still be happy and i am giving the way in
my following philosophy, so read my following philosophy so that to
understand:
More philosophy about The future of financial stability and cyber risk..
I have just read rapidly the following very interesting article,
i invite you to read it carefully:
The future of financial stability and cyber risk
https://www.brookings.edu/research/the-future-of-financial-stability-and-cyber-risk/
I think that we have to be positive about the future of financial
stability and cyber risk, since notice that the financial stability
depends on three things:
1- Leverage
2- Maturity and Risk Transformation
3- Procyclicality of the price of risk
Read the above article to notice it, but i think that for the first two,
i mean Leverage and Maturity and Risk Transformation, the financial institutions have not to put all the eggs in the same basket, so
they need to diversify the risk correctly, and for the third that is the Procyclicality of the price of risk, i think that it is less risky
since it depends on the "asset" prices that are diversified to a certain
level, and for the cyber risk i am positive since i think we are getting
much more sophisticated in cyber security. So i am positive.
More philosophy about what is the purpose of education..
I invite you to read the following interesting article:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/answer-sheet/wp/2015/02/12/whats-the-purpose-of-education-in-the-21st-century/
So can we ask a philosophical question of:
Should young people become educated to get prepared to enter the
workforce, or should the purpose of education be focused more on social, academic, cultural and intellectual development so that students can
grow up to be engaged citizens?
I think that we have to be optimistic because i just said in my
philosophy(read it below) that our era of globalization has been
characterized by the democratization of technology, democratization of
finance, and democratization of information, so as you are noticing that
we are "continually" educating ourselves in internet to become much
better citizens. So being connected to internet with a computer is
so important, so Africa too has to be connected to internet.
More philosophy about internet and phone and addiction and more..
I invite you to look at the following video:
The Ugly Truth about Modern Life!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFR0Mk9KDZ4
I think that the above video is making a mistake, since there is,
technically, no such thing as internet or phone "addiction",
here is the proof, read the following important article:
Is Internet Addiction Real?
https://childmind.org/article/is-internet-addiction-real/
And the above video is like wanting us to stop the engine of capitalism,
but i don't agree, because read my below philosophy:
More philosophy about the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche..
I think that i am a philosopher that is smart and i am understanding
the philosophy of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsch, and i think
that it is an inferior philosophy, because it seeks to construct
the superhumans from humans and this superhuman in the philosophy of
Friedrich Nietzsch is a superhuman that has mastery over his emotions
and it is a superhuman who takes joy in simply existing, so as you are
noticing that it is an inferior philosophy, because how can you be able
to take joy in simply existing ? so as you are noticing it is illogical
and it is as illogical as Stoicism(read my below thoughts about
Stoicism) and i think that it is a violent philosophy as Stoicism, this
is why the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsch is a failure as Stoicism,
so i think my new philosophy is much better and i invite you to read
it carefully in my below thoughts:
More of my philosophy about consumerism..
I think that i am a philosopher that is smart, so i invite
you to look at the following video, it is about capitalism and consumerism:
The Consoomer: Consumerism is Nihilism
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zZJ1BFQ1hw
I think the person that is talking in the above video is low IQ, i have
a high IQ and i answer the following:
Capitalism is a "tool" and you have to know how to use this tool and
capitalism is an "engine" that permits to create pleasures of life that
we enjoy (as services or products) so that to be happy(and this being
happy is the meaning of human life in my philosophy below), but notice
that this permits also the not rich to be happy because Mass production
in capitalism resulted in lower prices of consumer goods. Eventually,
economies of scale resulted in the most affordable price of any product
for the consumer without the manufacturer having to sacrifice profits,
and also look at how we are taking advantage of youtube videos or the
like in internet with a low price, and this low prices in capitalism
allows the not rich to be happy, and this at the same time avoids totalitarianism such as communism and neo-nazism and nazism(because they
are "Fascism" of socialism that is against capitalism), read my below philosophy to understand more, and notice that dictatorship of communism
of China is not communism, because it is using capitalism as an engine
that permits the people to be happy, so communism of China is not like communism, read my below philosophy to understand:
More of my philosophy about my philosophy and about Stoicism and Existentialism..
I invite you to read this very interesting article about philosophy:
Why philosophers could be the ones to transform your 2020
https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20200114-why-philosophers-could-be-the-ones-to-transform-your-2020
And notice that it says the following:
“The Stoics suggest that what’s most important in order to lead a good
life is internal rather than external. It’s about developing the right character, the right state of mind,”
I think i am a philosopher that is "smart", so i make you notice the
logical bug in the above saying about Stoicism, and it is that
developing the right character and the right state of the mind in
Stoicism needs the cultural side that also comes from the external
reality and hence from the "purpose" and the "meaning of life", and we
can notice that Stoicism is not so smart, because how can we develop self-control and fortitude as a means of overcoming destructive emotions
and such without the necessary requirements that have to give enough
hope or a meaning of life that gives the necessary self-control and
fortitude? so this is why i think that Stoicism as a philosophy is a
failure, so what's about existentialism of the philosopher Jean-Paul
Sartre ? Jean-Paul Sartre said that: "Existence precedes essence" or in
french: "L'existence précède l'essence", and it is the central claim of existentialism of the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre, but i think that
this claim is not so logical, since it is like a debate that asks the
question of: Wich is more important, the genetical side or cultural
side?, and we have to notice that the essence or nature of a human is
"not" enough and it needs for example a meaning of human life and a
purpose etc. so then notice that existentialism of Jean-Paul Sartre, and
like in absurdism of the philosopher Albert Camus, says that human life
is absurd, but here again my new philosophy says that human life is not
absurd and here is my new philosophy , read it again carefully:
So as you have just noticed that my philosophy is a new philosophy that
doesn't look like the others, and the architectural ideas of my
philosophy are the following:
There is an absolute and a relative way of measuring, so when we measure absolutely(i mean completely or totally) the meaning of human life, so
like in the case of absurdism of the philosopher Albert Camus, we can
say: "Absurdism arises out of the tension between our desire for order,
meaning and happiness and, on the other hand, the indifferent natural universe’s refusal to provide that", hence when we are measuring
absolutely the meaning of life, we can say that human life is absurd,
but the question in philosophy is: Is human life absurd? In my
philosophy human life is not absurd, because i say that happiness comes
from enjoying pleasures of life that we feel with our senses we humans,
and i am also defining the human sense as the one that comes from the
brain and from consciousness that gives pleasure, i mean
that when you are "learning" by looking at a video on youtube it can
give a pleasure inside your brain that comes from the brain and from consciousness, so when you are happiness by enjoying pleasures
of life with your human senses, you are enjoying life and you are
not thinking about the "absolute" meaning of human life, but the meaning
of human life becomes "relative", and since it becomes this relativeness
so human life becomes not absurd, since this enjoying pleasures of life
with our human senses is "like" a powerful "drug" that permit to be
happy and to not to be preoccupied with the absolute meaning of human
life that is talking about the philosopher Albert Camus.
More about my philosophy and about human existence..
I think that i am a philosopher that is smart, and now i will explain
more my philosophy so that you understand it:
Our era of globalization has been characterized by the democratization
of technology, democratization of finance, and democratization of
information, and from where do you think comes this progress ?
i think it comes from the "exponential" progress of our humanity, and
you have to understand this exponential progress of our humanity
correctly by reading my below thoughts, other than that i think that
those democratization of technology, democratization of finance, and democratization of information have like democratized
happiness too, i mean that before those democratizations brought
by the exponential progress of our humanity, Lower social class
and lower middle class had to be rich to be able to be happy,
because we were lacking technology and lacking tools that permit
to be happy without being rich, so this is why humanity was much more
violent because the not rich was violently fighting the rich etc. so we
had violent ideologies like communism and nazism etc. but i think that
today with the big advancement of technology and science etc. we are
able to be happy without being rich, and read my below thoughts to
understand how and to understand my philosophy about it, and read my
following thoughts about democratization of technology, democratization
of finance, and democratization of information so that you understand more:
And look at the following video:
Why Israel is a Tech Capital of the World
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RuPx61911Oo
I think that this jewish from Israel that is talking in the above video
is not thinking correctly, because there is two important things that
you must have so that a country be successful: Capital and talents, the
above video is making a mistake by saying that you need the two so that
to be successful, i mean it is saying that you need Capital and talents,
but i think he is making a mistake, because i think that Capital can
attract talents, so Capital can make you successful as a country, so
then i can logically infer that so that to have capital that make you successful, you have to know how to construct a product or services that
you can sell from those competitive advantages of competitive part or
parts of product or service that can come from you or/and can come from different countries of the global world, and it is i think an efficient
way that makes you adapt quickly and efficiently in this globalization,
and notice with me that having competitive part or parts of a product or service doesn't mean it has to come from R&D(Research and development),
also the above video of the jewish from Israel is not saying that
Capital can come from "democratization" of finance, since
you have to know that our global world has changed very much by being democratization of technology, democratization of finance, and
democratization of information, read my following thoughts so that you
also understand that Capital also comes from democratization of finance:
More about "democratization" of finance..
This "democratization" of finance is also for Research and Development
(R&D))..
And look at the following "democratization" of finance so that to
understand:
The 4 tools making capital more abundant than it’s ever been
Read more here:
https://singularityhub.com/2018/07/19/the-4-tools-making-capital-more-abundant-than-its-ever-been/
About democratization of digital technology and technology and Research
and Development (R&D) investment
This is also why i said the following:
Look at the following interesting video:
Can South Korea lead global innovation in Fourth Industrial Era?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XUw8gCShEcI
But i think that this minister of education, science and technology
of south Korea looks somewhat archaic since he is not taking correctly
into account the democratization of digital technology and Technology
that permits you to economically grow very rapidly and much cheaply than
using "expensive" Research and Development (R&D) investment, so i think
that he is not correctly adapting to the realities, because the economic realities have very much changed, since also our era of globalization
has been characterized by the democratization of technology,
democratization of finance, and democratization of information.
Here is more proof of what i am saying:
2. Question: What do you mean by “Democratizing Innovation”?
Eric von Hippel:
The tools for designing high-quality innovations are getting so cheap
and so ubiquitous that individuals can innovate for themselves at a
steadily higher quality and at a steadily decreasing cost. These
sophisticated modern tools are computer-based, and require relatively
little training and practice. As a result, even hobbyist users find they
can use them to design new products and services.
Read more here:
Democratizing Innovation: The Shift of Innovation to Users
https://www.ideaconnection.com/interviews/00010-Democratizing-Innovation-The-Shift-of-Innovation.html
More precision about more of my philosophy about indian meditation and
about my philosophy..
I invite you to look at the following video about indian meditation:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HHelfPFLXbs
I don't agree with indian meditation that wants us to stop seeking
pleasure of the senses, i think that indian meditation wants like
to solve the problem of materialism that causes problems such as
violence between the rich and not rich etc. but i think that my
philosophy is much better than indian meditation, so i invite
you to read it again carefully, and notice that the following
webpage is defining the human senses as the following:
The Five (and More) Senses
https://www.livescience.com/60752-human-senses.html
But i think that i am also defining the human sense as the one that
comes from the brain and from consciousness that gives pleasure, i mean
that when you are "learning" by looking at a video on youtube it can
give a pleasure inside your brain that comes from the brain and from consciousness.
So read my following philosophy that i think is much better than indian meditation:
Yet more philosophy about my philosophy..
I think that i am a philosopher that is smart, and i will ask
a question:
From where comes violence between peoples and between individuals ?
For example if a man has a big penis and another man has a small or
average penis they can get in violent fight between them because of this inequality.
Or if a man is rich and another man is not rich they can get into a
violent fight between them because of this inequality.
etc.
So now my philosophy is smart and it is saying that so that the rich
and the not rich not get into a violent fight because of inequality of
richness etc. we have to know from where "happiness" comes from and we
have to know that we can be happy without being rich by doing the
following, read my following thoughts to understand:
More philosophy about being materialistic and not being materialistic..
I will ask a smart question:
Am i a philosopher that is a materialistic ?
No, i am not materialistic , i am a philosopher that is seeking like a "balance" between being materialistic and not being materialistic , and
i am pragmatic, i will give you an example so that you understand my philosophy:
I think that looking at the videos of youtube is like being not
materialistic, since a video on youtube is like the immaterial, so then
you can enjoy those pleasures of life on internet by looking at the
videos of youtube or by reading facebook etc. by being not
materialistic, so then i am a philosopher that is convinced that we can
be happy even if we are not "rich", since with the sophistication of
internet and such tools, i say that we can be happy without being rich
by accessing internet and enjoying pleasures of life of internet and
such tools with a very low price, and what i predict that in about 10
years from now, and with the exponential progress of our humanity, we
will be happy and much more happy without being rich since this
exponential progress will provide us with much more powerful tools that
enhance much more the quality of our lives.
Read all my following my previous thoughts to understand more:
I think i am smart and i say that we have to be optimistic,
because happiness comes from enjoying pleasures of life that we feel
with our senses we humans, but my philosophy says that you can be happy
by not being rich and you can be happy by being rich, since notice
with me that today enjoying pleasures of life is also the fact that
we are accessing internet and taking advantage of looking at youtube or
reading facebook or searching and learning from Google etc. with a very
low price, and computers today cost a low price too, so i think that
we are being much more happy by enjoying those pleasures of life by
accessing internet at a very low price, this is why i think that
the exponential progress of our humanity will very soon, and in about 10
years from now, enhance much much more our lives by providing us
with very sophisticated tools, but we have to know how to manage this exponential progress of our humanity and we have also to be efficiently educated so that to be much better humans and so that Democracy works correctly, so this is why you have to take into account this exponential progress of our humanity, and read all my following thoughts to
understand better:
More of my philosophy about Eric Schmidt and about quantum computing and
about Moore's law..
I invite you to look carefully at this interesting Eric Schmidt's video:
Read about Eric Schmidt here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Schmidt
So look at his following video:
Eric Schmidt on the Early Strategic Decisions & Future of Quantum Computing
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wjG1fl6Ezdg
But in the video above i don't agree with Eric Schmidt about the end of
Moore's law, because look at the following discovery below that will
permit computers and phones to run thousands of times faster, so read
carefully my following thoughts to understand:
More of my philosophy about the exponential progress of our humanity..
I think that the white supremacists and neo-nazis and many humans are
not understanding correctly the exponential progress of our
humanity, so notice in my following news that the exponential progress
of our humanity is now going much faster and faster, so look for example
at the new discovery below that will permit computers and phones to run thousands of times faster, so you are noticing that it will make
artificial intelligence and such be much more powerful, so i think we
will soon be able to enhance much more our human genetics and we will
be able to do much more than that because the exponential progress of
our humanity will make us soon really much much more powerful, so we
have to be much more optimistic, so you have to read my following
thoughts below about the exponential progress of our humanity and you
have to read my following news below:
More political philosophy about: Are humans smart ?
So are humans smart ?
I am very positive about humans, and i think that humans are smart,
since we are also advancing by the following process of Swarm
Intelligence that is so efficient, read about it here:
How Swarm Intelligence Is Making Simple Tech Much Smarter
https://singularityhub.com/2018/02/08/how-swarm-intelligence-is-making-simple-tech-much-smarter/
So i think that "collectively", we humans, we are smart, and i think
that you will soon notice it by the following exponential progress of
our humanity, read about in my following thoughts:
More political philosophy about do we have to be pessimistic..
I think it is a beautiful day in history, and how can you understand it ?
First you will notice that the exponential progress of our humanity is
going very fast and is going faster and faster , look at the following
video to understand it:
Exponential Progress: Can We Expect Mind-Blowing Changes In The Near Future
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfM5HXpfnJQ&t=144s
So as you are noticing that you have to take this exponential progress
of our humanity into account and be much more optimistic.
And you have to know that this exponential progress of our humanity also
comes from the following process:
How Swarm Intelligence Is Making Simple Tech Much Smarter
https://singularityhub.com/2018/02/08/how-swarm-intelligence-is-making-simple-tech-much-smarter/
And here is my new poem called: "This beautiful exponential progress is
not a distress"
--
This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress
Because it is a beautiful maturity but not the adolescence
This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress
And we have to beautifully tune it with the beautiful consensus
This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress
So let us not be just guesses but technicality and science
This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress
So let us be a beautiful expressiveness that is not helpless
This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress
So let us take together this beautiful breakfast
This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress
Since you are also like my so beautiful Princess
This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress
So let us be a beautiful presence for present and future acceptance
--
Read my following news:
With the following new discovery computers and phones could run
thousands of times faster..
Prof Alan Dalton in the School of Mathematical and Physics Sciences at
the University of Sussex, said:
"We're mechanically creating kinks in a layer of graphene. It's a bit
like nano-origami.
"Using these nanomaterials will make our computer chips smaller and
faster. It is absolutely critical that this happens as computer
manufacturers are now at the limit of what they can do with traditional semiconducting technology. Ultimately, this will make our computers and
phones thousands of times faster in the future.
"This kind of technology -- "straintronics" using nanomaterials as
opposed to electronics -- allows space for more chips inside any device. Everything we want to do with computers -- to speed them up -- can be
done by crinkling graphene like this."
Dr Manoj Tripathi, Research Fellow in Nano-structured Materials at the University of Sussex and lead author on the paper, said:
"Instead of having to add foreign materials into a device, we've shown
we can create structures from graphene and other 2D materials simply by
adding deliberate kinks into the structure. By making this sort of
corrugation we can create a smart electronic component, like a
transistor, or a logic gate."
The development is a greener, more sustainable technology. Because no additional materials need to be added, and because this process works at
room temperature rather than high temperature, it uses less energy to
create.
Read more here:
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/02/210216100141.htm
More philosophy about how to be successful..
I have talked more about how to be successful(read my thoughts below
about it), but i think that you have to know about the ingredients that
bring success, and the most important ingredients that bring success is
to find the engines that push us forward towards more and more
perfection, and notice that if you say to people to work better and to
study better, it is not the way, since you have to tell wich engines
push us forward towards more and more perfection, for example
one very important engine that pushes us forward towards more and more perfection is to have the "positive spirit" so that to successful, so
when a people have the tendency to have a positive spirit , it is a kind
of positive energy that pushes us forward towards more and more
perfection, so it is also an engine, so when you are smart you will
notice that you have to find what are the engines that push us
forward towards more and more perfection because it is so important,
for example there is other engines that push us forward towards
more and more perfection and here is some of my philosophical thoughts
about morality that talk about them, here they are, and read them carefully:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/7UmkfURwoU4
Also read here my other thoughts of my philosophy that talks about other engines that push us forward towards more and more perfection:
https://scalable68.godaddysites.com/f/my-philosophy-about-human-existence
So as you are noticing by reading my philosophy that it is
a smart way of doing..
More philosophy about what is a language and what is a human meaning..
I think i am a philosopher and i will talk today about what is a
language and what is a human meaning:
So as you have just noticed i have just posted yesterday a new proverb
about what is a language etc.(read below about it), but you will notice
that there is many languages like the language of Love and language of technicality and the english language etc. but what is more important is
the meaning behind the language, since i think that the meaning precedes
the language, so this meaning behind the language is what makes us
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)