• More of my philosophy about creativity and innovation..

    From World90@21:1/5 to All on Mon Apr 26 18:07:28 2021
    Hello...


    More of my philosophy about creativity and innovation..

    I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
    invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

    I have just talked before about the importance of the following
    statement in business:

    "The focus should be on the product, since if the product is good
    the profits will follow"

    But notice that it is saying that if the product is good than the
    profits will follow, so as you are noticing we have to define what
    is a good product ? and does a good product only comes from science or
    from engineering? not at all !, since the product can become good by the process of creativity, and then we have to define creativity, and
    creativity needs globalization, since creativity and innovation come
    from ideas circulating and combining across nations and industries, and
    i invite you to read about what is creativity in the following
    interesting web page from Yale university:

    What Is Creativity?

    https://insights.som.yale.edu/insights/what-is-creativity

    So now you are understanding that creativity needs globalization , and
    read all my following thoughts so that to understand correctly:

    More of my philosophy about egoism and competition and collaboration and cooperation..

    I invite you to look at the following video:

    Why is Communism So Appealing?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_0UAsaqaOc

    I am not a communist, my political philosophy is different,
    and i think my philosophy is better, and i am explaining it in
    my below thoughts, i think that the philosophy of the philosopher and
    economist Adam Smith was lacking on efficiency, since he said that
    "Human egoism is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations"
    and i think it is not true, simply because creativity and innovation
    come not only from competition and its egoism, but they also come from
    ideas circulating and combining across nations and industries(so they
    need globalization), but egoism of competition is too much extremism
    that hurts because it has also the tendency to make ideas not
    circulating and combining efficiently across nations and industries, so
    my philosophy says that we have to seek like a balance between
    competition and collaboration or cooperation, and this needs also
    collaboration and cooperation by sharing ideas and sharing knowledge and sharing PhD papers and sharing open source softwares etc. and here is my
    new philosophy and model, read it carefully in my following thoughts:

    More philosophy about the Scottish and economist and philosopher called
    Adam Smith..

    I invite you to look at the following video about Adam Smith:

    ADAM SMITH - La main invisible

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OIvtWvDkkVk

    You can read about Adam Smith here:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Smith

    I think that i am a philosopher that is smart, and i say that
    the philosopher and economist Adam Smith was not right by saying the following(you
    can listen to it in the above video):

    "Human egoism is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations"

    I think that Adam Smith is not right by saying so, since my new
    philosophy and model says that you have to seek like a balance between collaboration or cooperation and competition(and egoism comes
    from competition), my philosophy says that innovation and creativity
    not only come from competition but it also come from ideas circulating
    and combining across nations and industries(so they need globalization),
    so in my philosophy creativity and innovation needs also collaboration
    and cooperation by sharing ideas and sharing knowledge and sharing PhD
    papers and sharing open source softwares etc. and here is my new
    philosophy and model:

    My today talk is about white supremacism and neo-nazism and the
    far-right and nationalism.

    So the first philosophical question is how to talk about
    those above ideologies?

    I think that it is also like a Mensa IQ test, so since i think i am
    smart, i have to use my smartness to solve the Mensa IQ test, so when
    you are smart, so how can you solve the problem(that is like a Mensa IQ
    test) of those above ideologies ? i think that i have first to detect
    the important pattern with my fluid intelligence, and i have to see
    clearly the pattern(like for example getting into the details from the abstraction of the pattern), and the important pattern is the following:

    Notice that it is like an optimization problem of artificial
    intelligence that looks like PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization), it is
    what we call Swarm intelligence, and in PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization)
    there is what we call local optimization that we call exploitation, and
    there is what we call global optimization that we call exploration(read
    about PSO in my thoughts below so that to understand), so if PSO is not balanced correctly with exploitation and exploration it can not converge
    to the global optimum, we say that PSO has to guarantee the optimal convergence, so if it is not correctly balanced with both exploitation
    and exploration it can get stuck in a local maximum and not to converge
    to global optimum, so then notice that with logical analogy, exploration
    and exploitation of PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization) is in philosophy
    like seeking the right balance between individualism and collectivism
    that guarantees the optimal convergence like in PSO, or it is like
    seeking the right balance between collaboration and competition that
    guarantees the optimal convergence like in PSO, so then since the above ideologies are nationalism and nationalism is too much local
    optimization and lack of global optimization , it is too much
    competition and lack of collaboration or cooperation, so it is by
    logical analogy like too much exploitation and lack of exploration in
    PSO, so this is not good and here is how to notice it , read the following:

    Read the following article about economic nationalism:

    Rise of Economic Nationalism and Its Implications

    https://www.lewisu.edu/experts/wordpress/index.php/rise-of-economic-nationalism-and-its-implications/


    Notice that it says the following:


    "Countries benefit with cooperation between countries to mutual benefit, becoming too nationalistic at the expense of its partners is
    counterproductive. It is an approach that creates conflict. Being more nationalistic tends to be a zero sum game in an increasingly
    interdependent world economy, where countries depend on other countries
    for their economic and political and national security well being. When companies cooperate, they can become more competitive. When they are
    more competitive, they hire more workers, pay higher salaries, and
    otherwise contribute to economic growth. Economic nationalism is a bad
    policy."

    So a you are noticing that nationalism is not the right way to do.

    This is why i also said the following:

    More political philosophy about globalization and nationalism..

    I am a white arab and i think i am more smart, so today i will
    talk about a very important subject about Globalization and nationalism,
    so i will invite you to look at the following video of Marine Le Pen of
    the far-right political party in France:

    Marine Le Pen explains why nationalism is important

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNpI9wKnE8Q

    As you notice that Marine Le Pen is saying in french that the
    fight today is between nationalism and globalization, since
    Marine Le Pen says that globalization is a treat to national
    identity and is a treat to national sovereignty, but i think that Marine
    Le Pen is not understanding correctly globalization, since i think that nationalism is too much competition and communism and socialism is too
    much collaboration , so i think the best way is to seek like a balance
    between collaboration and competition and when we look
    at globalization you will notice that we are collaborating with others
    by for example sharing Open Source softwares or Free softwares or PhD
    papers or knowledge on internet etc, and we are also competition by not collaborating with others, and with this new kind of model we are
    noticing that we are not just one identity like being french, but we are becoming multiple identities because this kind of new model is making a
    part of us that collaborate "universal", and this is why i think that
    Marine Le Pen is not understanding correctly this new kind of model of
    like seeking a balance between competition and collaboration , and i
    think that this new model is better because it is more efficient ,
    because i think this partly collaboration of this new model is good and
    more efficient for creativity, innovation, adaptability and speed of
    progress, i also think in capitalism the price of internet has gotten
    cheap and the price of computers has gotten cheap, so we are able today
    to access internet with a low price and benefit from "collaboration" and
    also sharing in internet, for example look at me, i have invented many
    scalable algorithms and i have decided to share some of them with the
    others, and it is of course collaboration , so look for example at my
    following inventions of scalable algorithms that i have shared with
    others, here they are:

    https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-mlock

    https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references

    https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-rwlock

    https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-rwlock-that-works-accross-processes-and-threads

    https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.programming.threads/VaOo1WVACgs

    https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/an-efficient-threadpool-engine-with-priorities-that-scales-very-well

    Also i have decided to not share others of my scalable algorithms and it
    is competition, so i am seeking like a balance between collaboration and competition.

    More philosophy about what is artificial intelligence and more..

    I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also invented
    many scalable algorithms and algorithms, and when you are smart you will
    easily understand artificial intelligence, this is why i am finding
    artificial intelligence easy to learn, i think to be able to understand artificial intelligence you have to understand reasoning with energy minimization, like with PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization), but
    you have to be smart since the Population based algorithm has to
    guarantee the optimal convergence, and this is why i am learning
    you how to do it(read below), i think that GA(genetic algorithm) is
    good for teaching it, but GA(genetic algorithm) doesn't guarantee the
    optimal convergence, and after learning how to do reasoning with energy minimization in artificial intelligence, you have to understand what is transfer learning in artificial intelligence with PathNet or such, this transfer learning permits to train faster and require less labeled data,
    also PathNET is much more powerful since also it is higher level
    abstraction in artificial intelligence..

    Read about it here:

    https://mattturck.com/frontierai/


    And read about PathNet here:

    https://medium.com/@thoszymkowiak/deepmind-just-published-a-mind-blowing-paper-pathnet-f72b1ed38d46


    More about artificial intelligence..

    I think one of the most important part in artificial intelligence is
    reasoning with energy minimization, it is the one that i am working on
    right now, see the following video to understand more about it:

    Yann LeCun: Can Neural Networks Reason?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAfwNEY826I&t=250s

    I think that since i have just understood much more artificial
    intelligence, i will soon show you my next Open source software project
    that implement a powerful Parallel Linear programming solver and a
    powerful Parallel Mixed-integer programming solver with Artificial
    intelligence using PSO, and i will write an article that explain
    much more artificial intelligence and what is smartness and what is consciousness and self-awareness..

    And in only one day i have just learned "much" more artificial
    intelligence, i have read the following article about Particle Swarm Optimization and i have understood it:

    Artificial Intelligence - Particle Swarm Optimization

    https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/archive/msdn-magazine/2011/august/artificial-intelligence-particle-swarm-optimization

    But i have just noticed that the above implementation doesn't guarantee
    the optimal convergence.

    So here is how to guarantee the optimal convergence in PSO:

    Clerc and Kennedy in (Trelea 2003) propose a constriction coefficient
    parameter selection guidelines in order to guarantee the optimal
    convergence, here is how to do it with PSO:

    v(t+1) = k*[(v(t) + (c1 * r1 * (p(t) – x(t)) + (c2 * r2 * (g(t) – x(t))]

    x(t+1) = x(t) + v(t+1)

    constriction coefficient parameter is:

    k = 2/abs(2-phi-sqrt(phi^2-(4*phi)))

    k:=2/abs((2-4.1)-(0.640)) = 0.729

    phi = c1 + c2

    To guarantee the optimal convergence use:

    c1 = c2 = 2.05

    phi = 4.1 => k equal to 0.729

    w=0.7298

    Population size = 60;


    Also i have noticed that GA(genetic algorithm) doesn't guarantee the
    optimal convergence, and SA(Simulated annealing) and Hill Climbing are
    much less powerful since they perform only exploitation.

    In general, any metaheuristic should perform two main searching
    capabilities (Exploration and Exploitation). Population based algorithms
    ( or many solutions ) such as GA, PSO, ACO, or ABC, performs both
    Exploration and Exploitation, while Single-Based Algorithm such as SA(Simulated annealing), Hill Climbing, performs the exploitation only.

    In this case, more exploitation and less exploration increases the
    chances for trapping in local optima. Because the algorithm does not
    have the ability to search in another position far from the current best solution ( which is Exploration).

    Simulated annealing starts in one valley and typically ends in the
    lowest point of the same valley. Whereas swarms start in many different
    places of the mountain range and are searching for the lowest point in
    many valleys simultaneously.

    And in my next Open source software project i will implement a powerful Parallel Linear programming solver and a powerful Parallel Mixed-integer programming solver with Artificial intelligence using PSO.



    Thank you,
    Amine Moulay Ramdane.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)