Hello...
More of my philosophy about creativity and innovation..
I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
I have just talked before about the importance of the following
statement in business:
"The focus should be on the product, since if the product is good
the profits will follow"
But notice that it is saying that if the product is good than the
profits will follow, so as you are noticing we have to define what
is a good product ? and does a good product only comes from science or
from engineering? not at all !, since the product can become good by the process of creativity, and then we have to define creativity, and
creativity needs globalization, since creativity and innovation come
from ideas circulating and combining across nations and industries, and
i invite you to read about what is creativity in the following
interesting web page from Yale university:
What Is Creativity?
https://insights.som.yale.edu/insights/what-is-creativity
So now you are understanding that creativity needs globalization , and
read all my following thoughts so that to understand correctly:
More of my philosophy about egoism and competition and collaboration and cooperation..
I invite you to look at the following video:
Why is Communism So Appealing?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_0UAsaqaOc
I am not a communist, my political philosophy is different,
and i think my philosophy is better, and i am explaining it in
my below thoughts, i think that the philosophy of the philosopher and
economist Adam Smith was lacking on efficiency, since he said that
"Human egoism is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations"
and i think it is not true, simply because creativity and innovation
come not only from competition and its egoism, but they also come from
ideas circulating and combining across nations and industries(so they
need globalization), but egoism of competition is too much extremism
that hurts because it has also the tendency to make ideas not
circulating and combining efficiently across nations and industries, so
my philosophy says that we have to seek like a balance between
competition and collaboration or cooperation, and this needs also
collaboration and cooperation by sharing ideas and sharing knowledge and sharing PhD papers and sharing open source softwares etc. and here is my
new philosophy and model, read it carefully in my following thoughts:
More philosophy about the Scottish and economist and philosopher called
Adam Smith..
I invite you to look at the following video about Adam Smith:
ADAM SMITH - La main invisible
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OIvtWvDkkVk
You can read about Adam Smith here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Smith
I think that i am a philosopher that is smart, and i say that
the philosopher and economist Adam Smith was not right by saying the following(you
can listen to it in the above video):
"Human egoism is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations"
I think that Adam Smith is not right by saying so, since my new
philosophy and model says that you have to seek like a balance between collaboration or cooperation and competition(and egoism comes
from competition), my philosophy says that innovation and creativity
not only come from competition but it also come from ideas circulating
and combining across nations and industries(so they need globalization),
so in my philosophy creativity and innovation needs also collaboration
and cooperation by sharing ideas and sharing knowledge and sharing PhD
papers and sharing open source softwares etc. and here is my new
philosophy and model:
My today talk is about white supremacism and neo-nazism and the
far-right and nationalism.
So the first philosophical question is how to talk about
those above ideologies?
I think that it is also like a Mensa IQ test, so since i think i am
smart, i have to use my smartness to solve the Mensa IQ test, so when
you are smart, so how can you solve the problem(that is like a Mensa IQ
test) of those above ideologies ? i think that i have first to detect
the important pattern with my fluid intelligence, and i have to see
clearly the pattern(like for example getting into the details from the abstraction of the pattern), and the important pattern is the following:
Notice that it is like an optimization problem of artificial
intelligence that looks like PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization), it is
what we call Swarm intelligence, and in PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization)
there is what we call local optimization that we call exploitation, and
there is what we call global optimization that we call exploration(read
about PSO in my thoughts below so that to understand), so if PSO is not balanced correctly with exploitation and exploration it can not converge
to the global optimum, we say that PSO has to guarantee the optimal convergence, so if it is not correctly balanced with both exploitation
and exploration it can get stuck in a local maximum and not to converge
to global optimum, so then notice that with logical analogy, exploration
and exploitation of PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization) is in philosophy
like seeking the right balance between individualism and collectivism
that guarantees the optimal convergence like in PSO, or it is like
seeking the right balance between collaboration and competition that
guarantees the optimal convergence like in PSO, so then since the above ideologies are nationalism and nationalism is too much local
optimization and lack of global optimization , it is too much
competition and lack of collaboration or cooperation, so it is by
logical analogy like too much exploitation and lack of exploration in
PSO, so this is not good and here is how to notice it , read the following:
Read the following article about economic nationalism:
Rise of Economic Nationalism and Its Implications
https://www.lewisu.edu/experts/wordpress/index.php/rise-of-economic-nationalism-and-its-implications/
Notice that it says the following:
"Countries benefit with cooperation between countries to mutual benefit, becoming too nationalistic at the expense of its partners is
counterproductive. It is an approach that creates conflict. Being more nationalistic tends to be a zero sum game in an increasingly
interdependent world economy, where countries depend on other countries
for their economic and political and national security well being. When companies cooperate, they can become more competitive. When they are
more competitive, they hire more workers, pay higher salaries, and
otherwise contribute to economic growth. Economic nationalism is a bad
policy."
So a you are noticing that nationalism is not the right way to do.
This is why i also said the following:
More political philosophy about globalization and nationalism..
I am a white arab and i think i am more smart, so today i will
talk about a very important subject about Globalization and nationalism,
so i will invite you to look at the following video of Marine Le Pen of
the far-right political party in France:
Marine Le Pen explains why nationalism is important
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNpI9wKnE8Q
As you notice that Marine Le Pen is saying in french that the
fight today is between nationalism and globalization, since
Marine Le Pen says that globalization is a treat to national
identity and is a treat to national sovereignty, but i think that Marine
Le Pen is not understanding correctly globalization, since i think that nationalism is too much competition and communism and socialism is too
much collaboration , so i think the best way is to seek like a balance
between collaboration and competition and when we look
at globalization you will notice that we are collaborating with others
by for example sharing Open Source softwares or Free softwares or PhD
papers or knowledge on internet etc, and we are also competition by not collaborating with others, and with this new kind of model we are
noticing that we are not just one identity like being french, but we are becoming multiple identities because this kind of new model is making a
part of us that collaborate "universal", and this is why i think that
Marine Le Pen is not understanding correctly this new kind of model of
like seeking a balance between competition and collaboration , and i
think that this new model is better because it is more efficient ,
because i think this partly collaboration of this new model is good and
more efficient for creativity, innovation, adaptability and speed of
progress, i also think in capitalism the price of internet has gotten
cheap and the price of computers has gotten cheap, so we are able today
to access internet with a low price and benefit from "collaboration" and
also sharing in internet, for example look at me, i have invented many
scalable algorithms and i have decided to share some of them with the
others, and it is of course collaboration , so look for example at my
following inventions of scalable algorithms that i have shared with
others, here they are:
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-mlock
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-rwlock
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-rwlock-that-works-accross-processes-and-threads
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.programming.threads/VaOo1WVACgs
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/an-efficient-threadpool-engine-with-priorities-that-scales-very-well
Also i have decided to not share others of my scalable algorithms and it
is competition, so i am seeking like a balance between collaboration and competition.
More philosophy about what is artificial intelligence and more..
I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also invented
many scalable algorithms and algorithms, and when you are smart you will
easily understand artificial intelligence, this is why i am finding
artificial intelligence easy to learn, i think to be able to understand artificial intelligence you have to understand reasoning with energy minimization, like with PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization), but
you have to be smart since the Population based algorithm has to
guarantee the optimal convergence, and this is why i am learning
you how to do it(read below), i think that GA(genetic algorithm) is
good for teaching it, but GA(genetic algorithm) doesn't guarantee the
optimal convergence, and after learning how to do reasoning with energy minimization in artificial intelligence, you have to understand what is transfer learning in artificial intelligence with PathNet or such, this transfer learning permits to train faster and require less labeled data,
also PathNET is much more powerful since also it is higher level
abstraction in artificial intelligence..
Read about it here:
https://mattturck.com/frontierai/
And read about PathNet here:
https://medium.com/@thoszymkowiak/deepmind-just-published-a-mind-blowing-paper-pathnet-f72b1ed38d46
More about artificial intelligence..
I think one of the most important part in artificial intelligence is
reasoning with energy minimization, it is the one that i am working on
right now, see the following video to understand more about it:
Yann LeCun: Can Neural Networks Reason?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAfwNEY826I&t=250s
I think that since i have just understood much more artificial
intelligence, i will soon show you my next Open source software project
that implement a powerful Parallel Linear programming solver and a
powerful Parallel Mixed-integer programming solver with Artificial
intelligence using PSO, and i will write an article that explain
much more artificial intelligence and what is smartness and what is consciousness and self-awareness..
And in only one day i have just learned "much" more artificial
intelligence, i have read the following article about Particle Swarm Optimization and i have understood it:
Artificial Intelligence - Particle Swarm Optimization
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/archive/msdn-magazine/2011/august/artificial-intelligence-particle-swarm-optimization
But i have just noticed that the above implementation doesn't guarantee
the optimal convergence.
So here is how to guarantee the optimal convergence in PSO:
Clerc and Kennedy in (Trelea 2003) propose a constriction coefficient
parameter selection guidelines in order to guarantee the optimal
convergence, here is how to do it with PSO:
v(t+1) = k*[(v(t) + (c1 * r1 * (p(t) – x(t)) + (c2 * r2 * (g(t) – x(t))]
x(t+1) = x(t) + v(t+1)
constriction coefficient parameter is:
k = 2/abs(2-phi-sqrt(phi^2-(4*phi)))
k:=2/abs((2-4.1)-(0.640)) = 0.729
phi = c1 + c2
To guarantee the optimal convergence use:
c1 = c2 = 2.05
phi = 4.1 => k equal to 0.729
w=0.7298
Population size = 60;
Also i have noticed that GA(genetic algorithm) doesn't guarantee the
optimal convergence, and SA(Simulated annealing) and Hill Climbing are
much less powerful since they perform only exploitation.
In general, any metaheuristic should perform two main searching
capabilities (Exploration and Exploitation). Population based algorithms
( or many solutions ) such as GA, PSO, ACO, or ABC, performs both
Exploration and Exploitation, while Single-Based Algorithm such as SA(Simulated annealing), Hill Climbing, performs the exploitation only.
In this case, more exploitation and less exploration increases the
chances for trapping in local optima. Because the algorithm does not
have the ability to search in another position far from the current best solution ( which is Exploration).
Simulated annealing starts in one valley and typically ends in the
lowest point of the same valley. Whereas swarms start in many different
places of the mountain range and are searching for the lowest point in
many valleys simultaneously.
And in my next Open source software project i will implement a powerful Parallel Linear programming solver and a powerful Parallel Mixed-integer programming solver with Artificial intelligence using PSO.
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)