On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 4:10:25 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
Michael Pendragon wrote:
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 2:03:26 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
Michael Pendragon wrote:
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 1:21:37 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:And if no proof exists, the accusations remain false.
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 1:17:17 PM UTC-4, michaelmalef...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 4:51:03 AM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:No, they're making false accusations, they need some proof.
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 12:44:55 AM UTC-4, ME wrote: >> >> > > > On Saturday, 18 September 2021 at 00:15:14 UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
Om Did you jist say that?
https://youtu.be/nmGuy0jievs >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > This is one of my comix zines created while in the Navy.... 1987 date so I'd have been in for one year at that time...
https://poopsheetfoundation.com/index.php/pf-database/mini-comics/bodeen-2
GJ SulzbachListing Details
Series TagBodeen
Issue2
MonthMay
Year1987
Writers / Artists
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Dimensions4¼ x 5½" (mini)That's for George T. , not George J.
Tags1980s
Scan Contributed byRick Bradford
Is Nancy Gene reall so dumb to be confused by such...?
I think not....
. We don't know if George T. was in the Navy, but we have no proof that George J. was.Not this time, as the records will show...:
Dance, it doesn’t take much to expose will and zod’sSo.... they spelled my name wrong on the website...Has NG even shown that there is such a person as "George T. "? Not that I've seen.
My J must have appeared as a T to the blogger...
https://poopsheetfoundation.com/media/com_mtree/images/listings/m/7845.jpg
https://poopsheetfoundation.com/index.php/pf-database/mini-comics/bodeen-2
That's bullshit, ME.The fact that zod has refused to have this ‘painting’ authenticatedThat's absurd, you've proven nothing.A copy of Zod's painting, we know.Exactly.No, the painting is online for all to see....The name as shown on the cover of the comic strip itself, is... G. J. not G.T.Zod, your refusal to allow ME to see this painting
No, that’s not a fact.Yes, it's a fact.
If you think that the painting isn't by Zod... prove it.
Show some evidence that the painting is actually by someone else.
Yes, you can only make false accusations because Zod is, in fact, the creator of the painting.
What is online is
If you claim the painting is by someone besides Zod....This is my second attempt at trying to see this ‘painting’..
Post proof.
You're welcome to look at Zod's painting as much as you want, as much as any of us do.
Click the link and look all you want.
As for your false accusations about the painting not being by Zod, all you have is s your false accusations.
If you think someone else painted it... prove it.
l
Thank you will for proving ME right.
The painting is a fraud xxxxxxxxxxxxxxccxxxxxxxxxxxxx
No, it isn't, your accusations are false.
If you had proof of your false accusations, you'd post it.
But, since the painting is actually by Zod, you'll never have proof otherwise, since no proof exists.
You can name call and make false accusations all you want, but the fact remains that the painting is by Zod.
An artist is under no obligation to have his work "authenticated"..
The painting was created by Zod.
If you don't think so...
Post proof.
You really are dumber than you look!
Of hes got to prove that its his work.
Will, you really are too stupid to live
You know not of art
No, if you want to claim it isn't Zod's art, then prove it.
You must think someone else painted it, then prove that.
All you've done so far is make false accusations.
The burden of proof is on the artist.
Otherwise, anyone could claim to have painted the Mona Lisa.They could easily be proven wrong.
You have no proof that Zod isn't the artist.
Exactly.
No one here has any means of knowing who the artist is...
If no proof of authorship exists, the accusations remain unprovenThat's why I say let the false accusers find some proof.
This is a typical Will xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 4:36:06 PM UTC-4, michaelmalef...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 4:10:25 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
Michael Pendragon wrote:
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 2:03:26 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
Michael Pendragon wrote:
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 1:21:37 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:And if no proof exists, the accusations remain false.
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 1:17:17 PM UTC-4, michaelmalef...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 4:51:03 AM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:No, they're making false accusations, they need some proof.
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 12:44:55 AM UTC-4, ME wrote:
On Saturday, 18 September 2021 at 00:15:14 UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
Om Did you jist say that?
https://youtu.be/nmGuy0jievsThis is one of my comix zines created while in the Navy.... 1987 date so I'd have been in for one year at that time...
https://poopsheetfoundation.com/index.php/pf-database/mini-comics/bodeen-2
GJ SulzbachListing Details
Series TagBodeen
Issue2
MonthMay
Year1987
Writers / Artists
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Dimensions4¼ x 5½" (mini) >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > Tags1980sThat's for George T. , not George J.
Scan Contributed byRick Bradford
Is Nancy Gene reall so dumb to be confused by such...?
I think not....
. We don't know if George T. was in the Navy, but we have no proof that George J. was.Not this time, as the records will show...:
Dance, it doesn’t take much to expose will and zod’sSo.... they spelled my name wrong on the website...Has NG even shown that there is such a person as "George T. "? Not that I've seen.
My J must have appeared as a T to the blogger...
https://poopsheetfoundation.com/media/com_mtree/images/listings/m/7845.jpg
https://poopsheetfoundation.com/index.php/pf-database/mini-comics/bodeen-2
That's bullshit, ME.The fact that zod has refused to have this ‘painting’ authenticatedThat's absurd, you've proven nothing.A copy of Zod's painting, we know.Exactly.No, the painting is online for all to see....The name as shown on the cover of the comic strip itself, is... G. J. not G.T.Zod, your refusal to allow ME to see this painting
No, that’s not a fact.Yes, it's a fact.
If you think that the painting isn't by Zod... prove it.
Show some evidence that the painting is actually by someone else.
Yes, you can only make false accusations because Zod is, in fact, the creator of the painting.
What is online is
If you claim the painting is by someone besides Zod....This is my second attempt at trying to see this ‘painting’..
Post proof.
You're welcome to look at Zod's painting as much as you want, as much as any of us do.
Click the link and look all you want.
As for your false accusations about the painting not being by Zod, all you have is s your false accusations.
If you think someone else painted it... prove it. >> >> > > > > > > > >l
Thank you will for proving ME right.
The painting is a fraud xxxxxxxxxxxxxxccxxxxxxxxxxxxx
No, it isn't, your accusations are false.
If you had proof of your false accusations, you'd post it.
But, since the painting is actually by Zod, you'll never have proof otherwise, since no proof exists.
You can name call and make false accusations all you want, but the fact remains that the painting is by Zod.
An artist is under no obligation to have his work "authenticated"..
The painting was created by Zod.
If you don't think so...
Post proof.
You really are dumber than you look!
Of hes got to prove that its his work.
Will, you really are too stupid to live
You know not of art
No, if you want to claim it isn't Zod's art, then prove it.
You must think someone else painted it, then prove that.
All you've done so far is make false accusations.
The burden of proof is on the artist.
Otherwise, anyone could claim to have painted the Mona Lisa.They could easily be proven wrong.
You have no proof that Zod isn't the artist.
Exactly.
No one here has any means of knowing who the artist is...
If no proof of authorship exists, the accusations remain unprovenThat's why I say let the false accusers find some proof.
xxx
This is a typical Will xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
It is actually correct and you know it... ASK George Dance about it... why don't we....?
https://news.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=93772&group=alt.arts.poetry.comments#93772
PING... George J Dance......
Indeed... the painting is mine, I created it, and have no interest in arguing about that...
You and Pendragon agree that I painted it....
And I await the opinion of George Dance today...
I thank in advance...!!
Ha ha ha...
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 4:46:48 PM UTC-4, tst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 4:36:06 PM UTC-4, michaelmalef...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 4:10:25 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
Michael Pendragon wrote:
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 2:03:26 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
Michael Pendragon wrote:
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 1:21:37 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:And if no proof exists, the accusations remain false.
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 1:17:17 PM UTC-4, michaelmalef...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 4:51:03 AM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:No, they're making false accusations, they need some proof.
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 12:44:55 AM UTC-4, ME wrote:
On Saturday, 18 September 2021 at 00:15:14 UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
Om Did you jist say that?
https://youtu.be/nmGuy0jievsThis is one of my comix zines created while in the Navy.... 1987 date so I'd have been in for one year at that time...
https://poopsheetfoundation.com/index.php/pf-database/mini-comics/bodeen-2
GJ SulzbachListing Details
Series TagBodeen
Issue2
MonthMay
Year1987
Writers / Artists
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > Dimensions4¼ x 5½" (mini)
Tags1980sThat's for George T. , not George J.
Scan Contributed byRick Bradford
Is Nancy Gene reall so dumb to be confused by such...?
I think not....
. We don't know if George T. was in the Navy, but we have no proof that George J. was.Not this time, as the records will show...:
Dance, it doesn’t take much to expose will and zod’sSo.... they spelled my name wrong on the website...Has NG even shown that there is such a person as "George T. "? Not that I've seen.
My J must have appeared as a T to the blogger...
https://poopsheetfoundation.com/media/com_mtree/images/listings/m/7845.jpg
https://poopsheetfoundation.com/index.php/pf-database/mini-comics/bodeen-2
That's bullshit, ME.The fact that zod has refused to have this ‘painting’ authenticatedThat's absurd, you've proven nothing.A copy of Zod's painting, we know.Exactly.No, the painting is online for all to see....The name as shown on the cover of the comic strip itself, is... G. J. not G.T.Zod, your refusal to allow ME to see this painting
No, that’s not a fact.Yes, it's a fact.
If you think that the painting isn't by Zod... prove it.
Show some evidence that the painting is actually by someone else.
Yes, you can only make false accusations because Zod is, in fact, the creator of the painting.
What is online is
If you claim the painting is by someone besides Zod....This is my second attempt at trying to see this ‘painting’..
Post proof.
You're welcome to look at Zod's painting as much as you want, as much as any of us do.
Click the link and look all you want.
As for your false accusations about the painting not being by Zod, all you have is s your false accusations.
If you think someone else painted it... prove it.
l
Thank you will for proving ME right.
The painting is a fraud xxxxxxxxxxxxxxccxxxxxxxxxxxxx
No, it isn't, your accusations are false.
If you had proof of your false accusations, you'd post it.
But, since the painting is actually by Zod, you'll never have proof otherwise, since no proof exists.
You can name call and make false accusations all you want, but the fact remains that the painting is by Zod.
An artist is under no obligation to have his work "authenticated"..
The painting was created by Zod.
If you don't think so...
Post proof.
You really are dumber than you look!
Of hes got to prove that its his work.
Will, you really are too stupid to live
You know not of art
No, if you want to claim it isn't Zod's art, then prove it. >> >> > >
You must think someone else painted it, then prove that.
All you've done so far is make false accusations.
The burden of proof is on the artist.
Otherwise, anyone could claim to have painted the Mona Lisa. >> >> They could easily be proven wrong.
You have no proof that Zod isn't the artist.
Exactly.
No one here has any means of knowing who the artist is...
If no proof of authorship exists, the accusations remain unprovenThat's why I say let the false accusers find some proof.
xxx
This is a typical Will xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
It is actually correct and you know it... ASK George Dance about it... why don't we....?
https://news.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=93772&group=alt.arts.poetry.comments#93772
PING... George J Dance......
Indeed... the painting is mine, I created it, and have no interest in arguing about that...
You and Pendragon agree that I painted it....
And I await the opinion of George Dance today...
I thank in advance...!!
Ha ha ha...I hope what I gave you on aapc was good enough. Sure, I think it's your painting; I don't take even take the claim it isn't seriously.I thank...
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 4:46:48 PM UTC-4, tst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 4:36:06 PM UTC-4, michaelmalef...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 4:10:25 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
Michael Pendragon wrote:
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 2:03:26 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
Michael Pendragon wrote:
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 1:21:37 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:And if no proof exists, the accusations remain false.
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 1:17:17 PM UTC-4, michaelmalef...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 4:51:03 AM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:No, they're making false accusations, they need some proof.
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 12:44:55 AM UTC-4, ME wrote:
On Saturday, 18 September 2021 at 00:15:14 UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
Om Did you jist say that?
https://youtu.be/nmGuy0jievsThis is one of my comix zines created while in the Navy.... 1987 date so I'd have been in for one year at that time...
https://poopsheetfoundation.com/index.php/pf-database/mini-comics/bodeen-2
GJ SulzbachListing Details
Series TagBodeen
Issue2
MonthMay
Year1987
Writers / Artists
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > Dimensions4¼ x 5½" (mini)
Tags1980sThat's for George T. , not George J.
Scan Contributed byRick Bradford
Is Nancy Gene reall so dumb to be confused by such...?
I think not....
. We don't know if George T. was in the Navy, but we have no proof that George J. was.Not this time, as the records will show...:
Dance, it doesn’t take much to expose will and zod’sSo.... they spelled my name wrong on the website...Has NG even shown that there is such a person as "George T. "? Not that I've seen.
My J must have appeared as a T to the blogger...
https://poopsheetfoundation.com/media/com_mtree/images/listings/m/7845.jpg
https://poopsheetfoundation.com/index.php/pf-database/mini-comics/bodeen-2
That's bullshit, ME.The fact that zod has refused to have this ‘painting’ authenticatedThat's absurd, you've proven nothing.A copy of Zod's painting, we know.Exactly.No, the painting is online for all to see....The name as shown on the cover of the comic strip itself, is... G. J. not G.T.Zod, your refusal to allow ME to see this painting
No, that’s not a fact.Yes, it's a fact.
If you think that the painting isn't by Zod... prove it.
Show some evidence that the painting is actually by someone else.
Yes, you can only make false accusations because Zod is, in fact, the creator of the painting.
What is online is
If you claim the painting is by someone besides Zod....This is my second attempt at trying to see this ‘painting’..
Post proof.
You're welcome to look at Zod's painting as much as you want, as much as any of us do.
Click the link and look all you want.
As for your false accusations about the painting not being by Zod, all you have is s your false accusations.
If you think someone else painted it... prove it.
l
Thank you will for proving ME right.
The painting is a fraud xxxxxxxxxxxxxxccxxxxxxxxxxxxx
No, it isn't, your accusations are false.
If you had proof of your false accusations, you'd post it.
But, since the painting is actually by Zod, you'll never have proof otherwise, since no proof exists.
You can name call and make false accusations all you want, but the fact remains that the painting is by Zod.
An artist is under no obligation to have his work "authenticated"..
The painting was created by Zod.
If you don't think so...
Post proof.
You really are dumber than you look!
Of hes got to prove that its his work.
Will, you really are too stupid to live
You know not of art
No, if you want to claim it isn't Zod's art, then prove it. >> >> > >
You must think someone else painted it, then prove that.
All you've done so far is make false accusations.
The burden of proof is on the artist.
Otherwise, anyone could claim to have painted the Mona Lisa. >> >> They could easily be proven wrong.
You have no proof that Zod isn't the artist.
Exactly.
No one here has any means of knowing who the artist is...
If no proof of authorship exists, the accusations remain unprovenThat's why I say let the false accusers find some proof.
xxx
This is a typical Will xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
It is actually correct and you know it... ASK George Dance about it... why don't we....?
https://news.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=93772&group=alt.arts.poetry.comments#93772
PING... George J Dance......
Indeed... the painting is mine, I created it, and have no interest in arguing about that...
You and Pendragon agree that I painted it....
And I await the opinion of George Dance today...
I thank in advance...!!
Ha ha ha...I hope what I gave you on aapc was good enough. Sure, I think it's your painting; I don't take even take the claim it isn't seriously.
On Monday, September 20, 2021 at 8:33:57 AM UTC-4, George J. Dance wrote:
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 4:46:48 PM UTC-4, tst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 4:36:06 PM UTC-4, michaelmalef...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 4:10:25 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
Michael Pendragon wrote:
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 2:03:26 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
Michael Pendragon wrote:
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 1:21:37 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:And if no proof exists, the accusations remain false.
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 1:17:17 PM UTC-4, michaelmalef...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 4:51:03 AM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:No, they're making false accusations, they need some proof.
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 12:44:55 AM UTC-4, ME wrote:
On Saturday, 18 September 2021 at 00:15:14 UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
Om Did you jist say that?
https://youtu.be/nmGuy0jievsThis is one of my comix zines created while in the Navy.... 1987 date so I'd have been in for one year at that time...
https://poopsheetfoundation.com/index.php/pf-database/mini-comics/bodeen-2
GJ SulzbachListing Details
Series TagBodeen
Issue2
MonthMay
Year1987
Writers / Artists
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > Dimensions4¼ x 5½" (mini)
Tags1980sThat's for George T. , not George J.
Scan Contributed byRick Bradford
Is Nancy Gene reall so dumb to be confused by such...?
I think not....
. We don't know if George T. was in the Navy, but we have no proof that George J. was.Not this time, as the records will show...:
Dance, it doesn’t take much to expose will and zod’sSo.... they spelled my name wrong on the website...Has NG even shown that there is such a person as "George T. "? Not that I've seen.
My J must have appeared as a T to the blogger...
https://poopsheetfoundation.com/media/com_mtree/images/listings/m/7845.jpg
https://poopsheetfoundation.com/index.php/pf-database/mini-comics/bodeen-2
That's bullshit, ME.The fact that zod has refused to have this ‘painting’ authenticatedThat's absurd, you've proven nothing.A copy of Zod's painting, we know.Exactly.No, the painting is online for all to see....The name as shown on the cover of the comic strip itself, is... G. J. not G.T.Zod, your refusal to allow ME to see this painting
No, that’s not a fact.Yes, it's a fact.
If you think that the painting isn't by Zod... prove it.
Show some evidence that the painting is actually by someone else.
Yes, you can only make false accusations because Zod is, in fact, the creator of the painting.
What is online is
If you claim the painting is by someone besides Zod....This is my second attempt at trying to see this ‘painting’..
Post proof.
You're welcome to look at Zod's painting as much as you want, as much as any of us do.
Click the link and look all you want.
As for your false accusations about the painting not being by Zod, all you have is s your false accusations.
If you think someone else painted it... prove it.
l
Thank you will for proving ME right.
The painting is a fraud xxxxxxxxxxxxxxccxxxxxxxxxxxxx
No, it isn't, your accusations are false.
If you had proof of your false accusations, you'd post it.
But, since the painting is actually by Zod, you'll never have proof otherwise, since no proof exists.
You can name call and make false accusations all you want, but the fact remains that the painting is by Zod.
An artist is under no obligation to have his work "authenticated"..
The painting was created by Zod.
If you don't think so...
Post proof.
You really are dumber than you look!
Of hes got to prove that its his work.
Will, you really are too stupid to live
You know not of art
No, if you want to claim it isn't Zod's art, then prove it.
You must think someone else painted it, then prove that. >> >> > >
All you've done so far is make false accusations.
The burden of proof is on the artist.
Otherwise, anyone could claim to have painted the Mona Lisa. >> >> They could easily be proven wrong.
You have no proof that Zod isn't the artist.
Exactly.
No one here has any means of knowing who the artist is...
If no proof of authorship exists, the accusations remain unprovenThat's why I say let the false accusers find some proof.
xxx
This is a typical Will xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
It is actually correct and you know it... ASK George Dance about it... why don't we....?
https://news.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=93772&group=alt.arts.poetry.comments#93772
PING... George J Dance......
Indeed... the painting is mine, I created it, and have no interest in arguing about that...
You and Pendragon agree that I painted it....
And I await the opinion of George Dance today...
I thank in advance...!!
Yes, they're going to keep on pounding it for a while, I expect to Pendragon wants David Schwimmer to verify the painting.Ha ha ha...I hope what I gave you on aapc was good enough. Sure, I think it's your painting; I don't take even take the claim it isn't seriously.
🙂
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 4:46:48 PM UTC-4, tst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 4:36:06 PM UTC-4, michaelmalef...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 4:10:25 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
Michael Pendragon wrote:
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 2:03:26 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
Michael Pendragon wrote:
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 1:21:37 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:And if no proof exists, the accusations remain false.
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 1:17:17 PM UTC-4, michaelmalef...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 4:51:03 AM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:No, they're making false accusations, they need some proof.
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 12:44:55 AM UTC-4, ME wrote:
On Saturday, 18 September 2021 at 00:15:14 UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
Om Did you jist say that?
https://youtu.be/nmGuy0jievsThis is one of my comix zines created while in the Navy.... 1987 date so I'd have been in for one year at that time...
https://poopsheetfoundation.com/index.php/pf-database/mini-comics/bodeen-2
GJ SulzbachListing Details
Series TagBodeen
Issue2
MonthMay
Year1987
Writers / Artists
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > Dimensions4¼ x 5½" (mini)
Tags1980sThat's for George T. , not George J.
Scan Contributed byRick Bradford
Is Nancy Gene reall so dumb to be confused by such...?
I think not....
. We don't know if George T. was in the Navy, but we have no proof that George J. was.Not this time, as the records will show...:
Dance, it doesn’t take much to expose will and zod’sSo.... they spelled my name wrong on the website...Has NG even shown that there is such a person as "George T. "? Not that I've seen.
My J must have appeared as a T to the blogger...
https://poopsheetfoundation.com/media/com_mtree/images/listings/m/7845.jpg
https://poopsheetfoundation.com/index.php/pf-database/mini-comics/bodeen-2
That's bullshit, ME.The fact that zod has refused to have this ‘painting’ authenticatedThat's absurd, you've proven nothing.A copy of Zod's painting, we know.Exactly.No, the painting is online for all to see....The name as shown on the cover of the comic strip itself, is... G. J. not G.T.Zod, your refusal to allow ME to see this painting
No, that’s not a fact.Yes, it's a fact.
If you think that the painting isn't by Zod... prove it.
Show some evidence that the painting is actually by someone else.
Yes, you can only make false accusations because Zod is, in fact, the creator of the painting.
What is online is
If you claim the painting is by someone besides Zod....This is my second attempt at trying to see this ‘painting’..
Post proof.
You're welcome to look at Zod's painting as much as you want, as much as any of us do.
Click the link and look all you want.
As for your false accusations about the painting not being by Zod, all you have is s your false accusations.
If you think someone else painted it... prove it.
l
Thank you will for proving ME right.
The painting is a fraud xxxxxxxxxxxxxxccxxxxxxxxxxxxx
No, it isn't, your accusations are false.
If you had proof of your false accusations, you'd post it.
But, since the painting is actually by Zod, you'll never have proof otherwise, since no proof exists.
You can name call and make false accusations all you want, but the fact remains that the painting is by Zod.
An artist is under no obligation to have his work "authenticated"..
The painting was created by Zod.
If you don't think so...
Post proof.
You really are dumber than you look!
Of hes got to prove that its his work.
Will, you really are too stupid to live
You know not of art
No, if you want to claim it isn't Zod's art, then prove it. >> >> > >
You must think someone else painted it, then prove that.
All you've done so far is make false accusations.
The burden of proof is on the artist.
Otherwise, anyone could claim to have painted the Mona Lisa. >> >> They could easily be proven wrong.
You have no proof that Zod isn't the artist.
Exactly.
No one here has any means of knowing who the artist is...
If no proof of authorship exists, the accusations remain unprovenThat's why I say let the false accusers find some proof.
xxx
This is a typical Will xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
It is actually correct and you know it... ASK George Dance about it... why don't we....?
https://news.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=93772&group=alt.arts.poetry.comments#93772
PING... George J Dance......
Indeed... the painting is mine, I created it, and have no interest in arguing about that...
You and Pendragon agree that I painted it....
And I await the opinion of George Dance today...
I thank in advance...!!
Ha ha ha...
I hope what I gave you on aapc was good enough. Sure, I think it's your painting; I don't take even take the claim it isn't seriously.
On Monday, September 20, 2021 at 8:33:57 AM UTC-4, George J. Dance wrote:
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 4:46:48 PM UTC-4, tst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 4:36:06 PM UTC-4, michaelmalef...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 4:10:25 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
Michael Pendragon wrote:
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 2:03:26 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
Michael Pendragon wrote:
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 1:21:37 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:And if no proof exists, the accusations remain false.
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 1:17:17 PM UTC-4, michaelmalef...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 4:51:03 AM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:No, they're making false accusations, they need some proof.
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 12:44:55 AM UTC-4, ME wrote:
On Saturday, 18 September 2021 at 00:15:14 UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
Om Did you jist say that?
https://youtu.be/nmGuy0jievsThis is one of my comix zines created while in the Navy.... 1987 date so I'd have been in for one year at that time...
https://poopsheetfoundation.com/index.php/pf-database/mini-comics/bodeen-2
GJ SulzbachListing Details
Series TagBodeen
Issue2
MonthMay
Year1987
Writers / Artists
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > Dimensions4¼ x 5½" (mini)
Tags1980sThat's for George T. , not George J.
Scan Contributed byRick Bradford
Is Nancy Gene reall so dumb to be confused by such...?
I think not....
. We don't know if George T. was in the Navy, but we have no proof that George J. was.Not this time, as the records will show...:
Dance, it doesn’t take much to expose will and zod’sSo.... they spelled my name wrong on the website...Has NG even shown that there is such a person as "George T. "? Not that I've seen.
My J must have appeared as a T to the blogger...
https://poopsheetfoundation.com/media/com_mtree/images/listings/m/7845.jpg
https://poopsheetfoundation.com/index.php/pf-database/mini-comics/bodeen-2
That's bullshit, ME.The fact that zod has refused to have this ‘painting’ authenticatedThat's absurd, you've proven nothing.A copy of Zod's painting, we know.Exactly.No, the painting is online for all to see....The name as shown on the cover of the comic strip itself, is... G. J. not G.T.Zod, your refusal to allow ME to see this painting
No, that’s not a fact.Yes, it's a fact.
If you think that the painting isn't by Zod... prove it.
Show some evidence that the painting is actually by someone else.
Yes, you can only make false accusations because Zod is, in fact, the creator of the painting.
What is online is
If you claim the painting is by someone besides Zod....This is my second attempt at trying to see this ‘painting’..
Post proof.
You're welcome to look at Zod's painting as much as you want, as much as any of us do.
Click the link and look all you want.
As for your false accusations about the painting not being by Zod, all you have is s your false accusations.
If you think someone else painted it... prove it.
l
Thank you will for proving ME right.
The painting is a fraud xxxxxxxxxxxxxxccxxxxxxxxxxxxx
No, it isn't, your accusations are false.
If you had proof of your false accusations, you'd post it.
But, since the painting is actually by Zod, you'll never have proof otherwise, since no proof exists.
You can name call and make false accusations all you want, but the fact remains that the painting is by Zod.
An artist is under no obligation to have his work "authenticated"..
The painting was created by Zod.
If you don't think so...
Post proof.
You really are dumber than you look!
Of hes got to prove that its his work.
Will, you really are too stupid to live
You know not of art
No, if you want to claim it isn't Zod's art, then prove it.
You must think someone else painted it, then prove that. >> >> > >
All you've done so far is make false accusations.
The burden of proof is on the artist.
Otherwise, anyone could claim to have painted the Mona Lisa. >> >> They could easily be proven wrong.
You have no proof that Zod isn't the artist.
Exactly.
No one here has any means of knowing who the artist is...
If no proof of authorship exists, the accusations remain unprovenThat's why I say let the false accusers find some proof.
xxx
This is a typical Will xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
It is actually correct and you know it... ASK George Dance about it... why don't we....?
https://news.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=93772&group=alt.arts.poetry.comments#93772
PING... George J Dance......
Indeed... the painting is mine, I created it, and have no interest in arguing about that...
You and Pendragon agree that I painted it....
And I await the opinion of George Dance today...
I thank in advance...!!
Ha ha ha...
I hope what I gave you on aapc was good enough. Sure, I think it's your painting; I don't take even take the claim it isn't seriously.I thank you G.D. and I hope you don't mind me quoting you, with the link to this thread...?
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.arts.poems/c/T33zr0FODs0/m/QqcLh52ACQAJ
Verify that this is okay, when you see this...?
On Friday, September 24, 2021 at 4:13:27 PM UTC-4, tst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, September 20, 2021 at 8:33:57 AM UTC-4, George J. Dance wrote:
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 4:46:48 PM UTC-4, tst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 4:36:06 PM UTC-4, michaelmalef...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 4:10:25 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
Michael Pendragon wrote:
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 2:03:26 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
Michael Pendragon wrote:
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 1:21:37 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:And if no proof exists, the accusations remain false.
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 1:17:17 PM UTC-4, michaelmalef...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 4:51:03 AM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:No, they're making false accusations, they need some proof. >> >> > Otherwise, anyone could claim to have painted the Mona Lisa.
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 12:44:55 AM UTC-4, ME wrote:
On Saturday, 18 September 2021 at 00:15:14 UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
Om Did you jist say that?
https://youtu.be/nmGuy0jievsThis is one of my comix zines created while in the Navy.... 1987 date so I'd have been in for one year at that time...
https://poopsheetfoundation.com/index.php/pf-database/mini-comics/bodeen-2
GJ SulzbachListing Details
Series TagBodeen
Issue2
MonthMay
Year1987
Writers / Artists
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Dimensions4¼ x 5½" (mini)That's for George T. , not George J.
Tags1980s
Scan Contributed byRick Bradford
Is Nancy Gene reall so dumb to be confused by such...?
I think not....
. We don't know if George T. was in the Navy, but we have no proof that George J. was.Not this time, as the records will show...:
Dance, it doesn’t take much to expose will and zod’sSo.... they spelled my name wrong on the website...Has NG even shown that there is such a person as "George T. "? Not that I've seen.
My J must have appeared as a T to the blogger...
https://poopsheetfoundation.com/media/com_mtree/images/listings/m/7845.jpg
https://poopsheetfoundation.com/index.php/pf-database/mini-comics/bodeen-2
That's bullshit, ME.The fact that zod has refused to have this ‘painting’ authenticatedThat's absurd, you've proven nothing.A copy of Zod's painting, we know.Exactly.No, the painting is online for all to see....The name as shown on the cover of the comic strip itself, is... G. J. not G.T.Zod, your refusal to allow ME to see this painting
No, that’s not a fact.Yes, it's a fact.
If you think that the painting isn't by Zod... prove it.
Show some evidence that the painting is actually by someone else.
Yes, you can only make false accusations because Zod is, in fact, the creator of the painting.
What is online is
If you claim the painting is by someone besides Zod....This is my second attempt at trying to see this ‘painting’..
Post proof.
You're welcome to look at Zod's painting as much as you want, as much as any of us do.
Click the link and look all you want.
As for your false accusations about the painting not being by Zod, all you have is s your false accusations.
If you think someone else painted it... prove it.
l
Thank you will for proving ME right.
The painting is a fraud xxxxxxxxxxxxxxccxxxxxxxxxxxxx
No, it isn't, your accusations are false.
If you had proof of your false accusations, you'd post it.
But, since the painting is actually by Zod, you'll never have proof otherwise, since no proof exists.
You can name call and make false accusations all you want, but the fact remains that the painting is by Zod.
An artist is under no obligation to have his work "authenticated"..
The painting was created by Zod.
If you don't think so...
Post proof.
You really are dumber than you look!
Of hes got to prove that its his work.
Will, you really are too stupid to live
You know not of art
No, if you want to claim it isn't Zod's art, then prove it.
You must think someone else painted it, then prove that. >> >> > >
All you've done so far is make false accusations.
The burden of proof is on the artist.
They could easily be proven wrong.
You have no proof that Zod isn't the artist.
Exactly.
No one here has any means of knowing who the artist is...
If no proof of authorship exists, the accusations remain unprovenThat's why I say let the false accusers find some proof.
xxx
This is a typical Will xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
It is actually correct and you know it... ASK George Dance about it... why don't we....?
https://news.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=93772&group=alt.arts.poetry.comments#93772
PING... George J Dance......
Indeed... the painting is mine, I created it, and have no interest in arguing about that...
You and Pendragon agree that I painted it....
And I await the opinion of George Dance today...
I thank in advance...!!
Ha ha ha...
I hope what I gave you on aapc was good enough. Sure, I think it's your painting; I don't take even take the claim it isn't seriously.I thank you G.D. and I hope you don't mind me quoting you, with the link to this thread...?
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.arts.poems/c/T33zr0FODs0/m/QqcLh52ACQAJ
Verify that this is okay, when you see this...?Yeah, that's fine. I don't want to have to keep writing about it or the navy nonsense, but you're welcome to use what I've already written.
On Friday, September 24, 2021 at 4:13:27 PM UTC-4, tst...@gmail.com wrote:
And if no proof exists, the accusations remain false.No, they're making false accusations, they need some proof. >> >> > Otherwise, anyone could claim to have painted the Mona Lisa.Om Did you jist say that?https://youtu.be/nmGuy0jievsThis is one of my comix zines created while in the Navy.... 1987 date so I'd have been in for one year at that time...
https://poopsheetfoundation.com/index.php/pf-database/mini-comics/bodeen-2
GJ SulzbachListing Details
Series TagBodeen
Issue2
MonthMay
Year1987
Writers / Artists
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Dimensions4¼ x 5½" (mini)That's for George T. , not George J.
Tags1980s
Scan Contributed byRick Bradford
Is Nancy Gene reall so dumb to be confused by such...?
I think not....
. We don't know if George T. was in the Navy, but we have no proof that George J. was.Not this time, as the records will show...:
Dance, it doesn’t take much to expose will and zod’sSo.... they spelled my name wrong on the website...Has NG even shown that there is such a person as "George T. "? Not that I've seen.
My J must have appeared as a T to the blogger...
https://poopsheetfoundation.com/media/com_mtree/images/listings/m/7845.jpg
https://poopsheetfoundation.com/index.php/pf-database/mini-comics/bodeen-2
That's bullshit, ME.The fact that zod has refused to have this ‘painting’ authenticatedThat's absurd, you've proven nothing.A copy of Zod's painting, we know.Exactly.No, the painting is online for all to see....The name as shown on the cover of the comic strip itself, is... G. J. not G.T.Zod, your refusal to allow ME to see this painting
No, that’s not a fact.Yes, it's a fact.
If you think that the painting isn't by Zod... prove it.
Show some evidence that the painting is actually by someone else.
Yes, you can only make false accusations because Zod is, in fact, the creator of the painting.
What is online is
If you claim the painting is by someone besides Zod....This is my second attempt at trying to see this ‘painting’..
Post proof.
You're welcome to look at Zod's painting as much as you want, as much as any of us do.
Click the link and look all you want.
As for your false accusations about the painting not being by Zod, all you have is s your false accusations.
If you think someone else painted it... prove it.
l
Thank you will for proving ME right.
The painting is a fraud xxxxxxxxxxxxxxccxxxxxxxxxxxxx
No, it isn't, your accusations are false.
If you had proof of your false accusations, you'd post it.
But, since the painting is actually by Zod, you'll never have proof otherwise, since no proof exists.
You can name call and make false accusations all you want, but the fact remains that the painting is by Zod.
An artist is under no obligation to have his work "authenticated"..
The painting was created by Zod.
If you don't think so...
Post proof.
You really are dumber than you look!
Of hes got to prove that its his work.
Will, you really are too stupid to live
You know not of art
No, if you want to claim it isn't Zod's art, then prove it.
You must think someone else painted it, then prove that. >> >> > >
All you've done so far is make false accusations.
The burden of proof is on the artist.
They could easily be proven wrong.
You have no proof that Zod isn't the artist.
Exactly.
No one here has any means of knowing who the artist is...
If no proof of authorship exists, the accusations remain unprovenThat's why I say let the false accusers find some proof.
xxx
This is a typical Will xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
It is actually correct and you know it... ASK George Dance about it... why don't we....?
https://news.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=93772&group=alt.arts.poetry.comments#93772
PING... George J Dance......
Indeed... the painting is mine, I created it, and have no interest in arguing about that...
You and Pendragon agree that I painted it....
And I await the opinion of George Dance today...
I thank in advance...!!
Ha ha ha...
I hope what I gave you on aapc was good enough. Sure, I think it's your painting; I don't take even take the claim it isn't seriously.I thank you G.D. and I hope you don't mind me quoting you, with the link to this thread...?
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.arts.poems/c/T33zr0FODs0/m/QqcLh52ACQAJ
Verify that this is okay, when you see this...?Yeah, that's fine. I don't want to have to keep writing about it or the navy nonsense, but you're welcome to use what I've already written.
On Saturday, September 25, 2021 at 7:12:35 PM UTC-4, George J. Dance wrote:
On Friday, September 24, 2021 at 4:13:27 PM UTC-4, tst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, September 20, 2021 at 8:33:57 AM UTC-4, George J. Dance wrote:
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 4:46:48 PM UTC-4, tst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 4:36:06 PM UTC-4, michaelmalef...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 4:10:25 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
Michael Pendragon wrote:
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 2:03:26 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
Michael Pendragon wrote:
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 1:21:37 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 1:17:17 PM UTC-4, michaelmalef...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 4:51:03 AM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:No, they're making false accusations, they need some proof.
On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 12:44:55 AM UTC-4, ME wrote:
On Saturday, 18 September 2021 at 00:15:14 UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
Om Did you jist say that?
https://youtu.be/nmGuy0jievsThis is one of my comix zines created while in the Navy.... 1987 date so I'd have been in for one year at that time...
https://poopsheetfoundation.com/index.php/pf-database/mini-comics/bodeen-2
GJ SulzbachListing Details
Series TagBodeen
Issue2
MonthMay
Year1987
Writers / Artists
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Dimensions4¼ x 5½" (mini)That's for George T. , not George J.
Tags1980s
Scan Contributed byRick Bradford
Is Nancy Gene reall so dumb to be confused by such...?
I think not....
. We don't know if George T. was in the Navy, but we have no proof that George J. was.Not this time, as the records will show...:
Dance, it doesn’t take much to expose will and zod’sSo.... they spelled my name wrong on the website...Has NG even shown that there is such a person as "George T. "? Not that I've seen.
My J must have appeared as a T to the blogger...
https://poopsheetfoundation.com/media/com_mtree/images/listings/m/7845.jpg
https://poopsheetfoundation.com/index.php/pf-database/mini-comics/bodeen-2
That's bullshit, ME.The fact that zod has refused to have this ‘painting’ authenticatedThat's absurd, you've proven nothing.A copy of Zod's painting, we know.Exactly.No, the painting is online for all to see....The name as shown on the cover of the comic strip itself, is... G. J. not G.T.Zod, your refusal to allow ME to see this painting
No, that’s not a fact.Yes, it's a fact.
If you think that the painting isn't by Zod... prove it.
Show some evidence that the painting is actually by someone else.
Yes, you can only make false accusations because Zod is, in fact, the creator of the painting.
What is online is
If you claim the painting is by someone besides Zod....This is my second attempt at trying to see this ‘painting’..
Post proof.
You're welcome to look at Zod's painting as much as you want, as much as any of us do.
Click the link and look all you want.
As for your false accusations about the painting not being by Zod, all you have is s your false accusations.
If you think someone else painted it... prove it.
l
Thank you will for proving ME right.
The painting is a fraud xxxxxxxxxxxxxxccxxxxxxxxxxxxx
No, it isn't, your accusations are false.
If you had proof of your false accusations, you'd post it.
But, since the painting is actually by Zod, you'll never have proof otherwise, since no proof exists.
You can name call and make false accusations all you want, but the fact remains that the painting is by Zod.
An artist is under no obligation to have his work "authenticated"..
The painting was created by Zod.
If you don't think so...
Post proof.
You really are dumber than you look!
Of hes got to prove that its his work.
Will, you really are too stupid to live
You know not of art
No, if you want to claim it isn't Zod's art, then prove it.
You must think someone else painted it, then prove that.
All you've done so far is make false accusations.
The burden of proof is on the artist.
Otherwise, anyone could claim to have painted the Mona Lisa.They could easily be proven wrong.
You have no proof that Zod isn't the artist.
Exactly.
No one here has any means of knowing who the artist is... >> And if no proof exists, the accusations remain false.
If no proof of authorship exists, the accusations remain unprovenThat's why I say let the false accusers find some proof.
xxx
This is a typical Will xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
It is actually correct and you know it... ASK George Dance about it... why don't we....?
https://news.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=93772&group=alt.arts.poetry.comments#93772
PING... George J Dance......
Indeed... the painting is mine, I created it, and have no interest in arguing about that...
You and Pendragon agree that I painted it....
And I await the opinion of George Dance today...
I thank in advance...!!
Ha ha ha...
I hope what I gave you on aapc was good enough. Sure, I think it's your painting; I don't take even take the claim it isn't seriously.I thank you G.D. and I hope you don't mind me quoting you, with the link to this thread...?
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.arts.poems/c/T33zr0FODs0/m/QqcLh52ACQAJ
On second thought, don't give the link to the thread. I don't want to give NG an excuse of rummaging through it, or even worse the thought of spying on rap in the future. But the quote is OK; and I'll come in and verify it if anyone challenges it.Verify that this is okay, when you see this...?Yeah, that's fine. I don't want to have to keep writing about it or the navy nonsense, but you're welcome to use what I've already written.
On Friday, September 24, 2021 at 4:13:27 PM UTC-4, tst...@gmail.com wrote:
And if no proof exists, the accusations remain false.No, they're making false accusations, they need some proof. >> >> > Otherwise, anyone could claim to have painted the Mona Lisa.Om Did you jist say that?https://youtu.be/nmGuy0jievsThis is one of my comix zines created while in the Navy.... 1987 date so I'd have been in for one year at that time...
https://poopsheetfoundation.com/index.php/pf-database/mini-comics/bodeen-2
GJ SulzbachListing Details
Series TagBodeen
Issue2
MonthMay
Year1987
Writers / Artists
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Dimensions4¼ x 5½" (mini)That's for George T. , not George J.
Tags1980s
Scan Contributed byRick Bradford
Is Nancy Gene reall so dumb to be confused by such...?
I think not....
. We don't know if George T. was in the Navy, but we have no proof that George J. was.Not this time, as the records will show...:
Dance, it doesn’t take much to expose will and zod’sSo.... they spelled my name wrong on the website...Has NG even shown that there is such a person as "George T. "? Not that I've seen.
My J must have appeared as a T to the blogger...
https://poopsheetfoundation.com/media/com_mtree/images/listings/m/7845.jpg
https://poopsheetfoundation.com/index.php/pf-database/mini-comics/bodeen-2
That's bullshit, ME.The fact that zod has refused to have this ‘painting’ authenticatedThat's absurd, you've proven nothing.A copy of Zod's painting, we know.Exactly.No, the painting is online for all to see....The name as shown on the cover of the comic strip itself, is... G. J. not G.T.Zod, your refusal to allow ME to see this painting
No, that’s not a fact.Yes, it's a fact.
If you think that the painting isn't by Zod... prove it.
Show some evidence that the painting is actually by someone else.
Yes, you can only make false accusations because Zod is, in fact, the creator of the painting.
What is online is
If you claim the painting is by someone besides Zod....This is my second attempt at trying to see this ‘painting’..
Post proof.
You're welcome to look at Zod's painting as much as you want, as much as any of us do.
Click the link and look all you want.
As for your false accusations about the painting not being by Zod, all you have is s your false accusations.
If you think someone else painted it... prove it.
l
Thank you will for proving ME right.
The painting is a fraud xxxxxxxxxxxxxxccxxxxxxxxxxxxx
No, it isn't, your accusations are false.
If you had proof of your false accusations, you'd post it.
But, since the painting is actually by Zod, you'll never have proof otherwise, since no proof exists.
You can name call and make false accusations all you want, but the fact remains that the painting is by Zod.
An artist is under no obligation to have his work "authenticated"..
The painting was created by Zod.
If you don't think so...
Post proof.
You really are dumber than you look!
Of hes got to prove that its his work.
Will, you really are too stupid to live
You know not of art
No, if you want to claim it isn't Zod's art, then prove it.
You must think someone else painted it, then prove that. >> >> > >
All you've done so far is make false accusations.
The burden of proof is on the artist.
They could easily be proven wrong.
You have no proof that Zod isn't the artist.
Exactly.
No one here has any means of knowing who the artist is...
If no proof of authorship exists, the accusations remain unprovenThat's why I say let the false accusers find some proof.
xxx
This is a typical Will xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
It is actually correct and you know it... ASK George Dance about it... why don't we....?
https://news.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=93772&group=alt.arts.poetry.comments#93772
PING... George J Dance......
Indeed... the painting is mine, I created it, and have no interest in arguing about that...
You and Pendragon agree that I painted it....
And I await the opinion of George Dance today...
I thank in advance...!!
Ha ha ha...
I hope what I gave you on aapc was good enough. Sure, I think it's your painting; I don't take even take the claim it isn't seriously.I thank you G.D. and I hope you don't mind me quoting you, with the link to this thread...?
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.arts.poems/c/T33zr0FODs0/m/QqcLh52ACQAJ
Verify that this is okay, when you see this...?Yeah, that's fine. I don't want to have to keep writing about it or the navy nonsense, but you're welcome to use what I've already written.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 296 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 70:36:39 |
| Calls: | 6,656 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 12,200 |
| Messages: | 5,332,151 |
| Posted today: | 1 |
