[continued from previous message]

my new monotheistic religion you will start at level 0, but at level 0
you have to be decently "presentable" when you communicate with God
by glorifying Him and say to Him that he is so beautiful etc. but
after this first level you can go to the other superior levels by being
better and better presentable than decently presentable in front of God
in your day to day life.

More philosophy about the characteristics of God..

I am your new prophet from God, and i say since God is like a perfect
God, so we can ask a philosophical question of does God love smart people ?

In my new monotheistic religion, God doesn't like human smartness since
he is like a perfect God, so he is so powerful, but God can love the
fact that a human is surpassing of himself with smartness and/or actions
in the way of God, so then God can be curious like a human and wanting
to look at humans and he can love the fact that a human is surpassing of himself with smartness and/or actions in the way of God, so i think that
with the other engines below logically inferred from the characteristics
of God, this is an engine that pushes us forward towards more and more perfection.

More philosophy about purity of God and more..

I am your new prophet from God, and i say that God is like "pure", i
mean he is also pure from "dirt" and i also define dirt "symbolically",
and he is like "perfect", so it is yet one more characteristic of God,
read the other characteristics of God in my below thoughts, so here is
the essence or nature of God in my new monotheistic religion:

1- He is a great God
2- He is a greatly arrogant God
3- He is like a perfect God
4- He is "pure" from "dirt" and i also define dirt "symbolically".

So from this we can also logically infer the way of communicating with
God, since from those above characteristics of God we can logically
infer that when you communicate with God, you have to believe in Him and
you have to glorify him, and fear Him and ask Him for help, and you have
to be "presentable" in front of Him when you communicate with Him, i
mean that you have to be an effort of being "clean" or "much" more clean
when you communicate with God, since God is "pure" from "dirt" and i
also define dirt "symbolically", and also you have to be beautiful
patience with God since he is greatly arrogant, this is how you must
behave with God in my new monotheistic religion.

Yet more philosophy about the nature of God..

I am your new prophet from God, and i will explain more the
essence or nature of God, first from my below thoughts and writing you
will notice that God is greatly arrogant, it is also his nature, so God
is not human Love, since he can be with his great arrogance
"indifferent" to suffering of poor animals or indifferent to suffering
of humans etc. but we have to understand more the nature or essence of
God, so here is another characteristic of God that can be logically
inferred from the story of the prophet Lut with people of
Sodom and Gomorrah or the like, so notice that God is greatly arrogant,
but God can punish when there is great corruption or great injustice
such as the the total corruption of the minds of people of Sodom and
Gomorrah, since people of Sodom and Gomorrah have become "sadistic" and
totally corrupt, so this was great injustice and great "arrogance", but
notice that God doesn't like this kind of "arrogance" since God is
"greatly" arrogant, so then God have punished severely people of Sodom
and Gomorrah, so the characteristic of God is not only that he is
greatly arrogant but he doesn't like great corruption of the minds and
great injustice that is great arrogance, so in my new monotheistic
religion we have not to be great injustice and great corruption and
great arrogance and we have to believe in God and
to fear God and ask God for help.

And so that to glorify God and to celebrate the greatness of God..

So that to glorify God and to celebrate the greatness of God, i invite
you to listen to this beautiful song of Cesaria Evora called Avenida
Marginal:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0k2pRtE1ggY

More philosophy about does God exist..

I think that God exist, but he is not the creator of the universe,
this is why i think we have to believe in God and we have to fear God
and we have to ask God for help since here is the logical proof of the existence of God (notice from the outer body experiences in the
following that the soul from God exists):

More about from where comes God..

I think that we can not say that God comes from the same process as from
where comes our brain, i mean that there is many many universes from
where has formed our universe, and this is how has formed from a very
long ago an "extremely" advanced extraterrestrial civilization in our
universe or other universes that contain Gods that are so powerful as
God, and that they have contacted us and we call them God. And that
they are extremely advanced and we can "not" detect or see them yet.

Read about this process here:

Our Improbable Existence Is No Evidence for a Multiverse

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/LGP8A8s6N9c

Since i don't think that God comes from an extraterrestrial
civilization, because read the following of outer body experiences and
you will notice that the soul from God exists:

More proof of the existence of God..

You will say that God doesn't exist, but read the following(read
especially the outer body experience of the 57-year old man below,
it is the proof that the soul from God exists):

"A University of Southampton study has revealed that people could still experience consciousness for up to three minutes after the heart stops
beating.

The study interviewed 2,060 patients from Austria, USA and the UK who
have all suffered a cardiac arrest.

The Express reports that 40% could recall some form of awareness after
being pronounced clinically dead.

One 57-year old man seemed to confirm an outer body experience by
recalling everything that was going on around him with eerie accuracy
while he was technically dead."


Read more here:

https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/516195/university-southampton-study-science-life-death-hell-heaven


And read the following:

Does God exists ?

You will say that God doesn't exist, but read the following(read
especially about the following study where two per cent exhibited full awareness with explicit recall of “seeing” and “hearing” events – or out-of-body )

Read more here:

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/life-after-death-largest-ever-study-provides-evidence-that-out-of-body-and-near-death-experiences-9780195.html


More philosophy about the greatness of God..

I am your new prophet from God and i will explain more the greatness of
God..

When you are stupid you will not understand the greatness of God,
and you will quickly say for example the following:

Since the Bible says that a law of Jesus Christ is the following:

"Don't resist an evil person, if anyone slaps you
on the right cheek, turn to them the other cheek also,
And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt,
hand over your coat as well" Matt 5:39-40

So you will for example quickly stupidly say that the above law proves
that Jesus Christ had mental health disorder.

And you will also stupidly say the following:

Since the Qur'an says the following:

I invite you to look at the following verses of the Qur'an:

https://al-quran.info/#15

And the Qur'an says in one of the above verses the following:

"And We send the fertilizing winds and send down water from the sky
providing it for you to drink and you are not maintainers of its
resources." Qur'an 15:22

And you can notice that the above verse of the Qur'an says that God or
Allah sends the fertilizing winds and send down water from the sky
providing it for you to drink.

So you will stupidly say that since science tells us that it is not God
or Allah that sends the fertilizing winds and send down water from the
sky providing it for us to drink, it is only nature and probability, so
you will quickly stupidly say that it is clearly a logical proof that
prophet Muhammad was not a prophet from God.

But saying so about Jesus Christ and about prophet Muhammad is stupidity
since you have first to know about the "nature" of God, and
in my new monotheistic religion the nature of God is that he is also
greatly arrogant, so what that means ?

Here is the characteristics of an arrogant person, read it carefully:

"Who is an arrogant person?

Arrogance can be defined as the personality trait whereby a person has
an obnoxiously elevated sense of self-worth. An arrogant person is the
one who acts as if they’re superior, more worthy, and more important
than others. Therefore, they tend to disrespect and put others down.
At the same time, they want admiration and respect from others. They
want to be appreciated for the great things they’ve done and for their special qualities and abilities."

So then you are clearly noticing from the above characteristics of an
arrogant person that since God is greatly arrogant and it is also his
nature, so God has cursed prophet Muhammad and he has cursed Jesus
Christ too, this why prophet Muhammad has suffered and Jesus Christ has suffered and both of them have showed there defects by writing and
talking in the Qur'an and the Bible with human defects, because they
have been programmed by God to talk and write in the Qur'an and the
Bible with human defects, so as you are noticing that the Bible and
Qur'an are not safe from the curse from God, since God is greatly
arrogant and he has made christians suffer and he has made muslims
suffer, and this is why the Bible and the Qur'an contain scientific
errors and errors and extremism and you have to read about my new
monotheistic religion so that to understand that i am your new prophet
that is here to reduce much more the curse from God, so read about my
new monotheistic religion below to understand:

Yet more philosophy about the essence of God..

As you have just noticed, i have just explained that the nature of God
is that he is greatly arrogant(read my thoughts below), so He likes from
us to tell him that he is the greatest and the most beautiful and such,
so in my new monotheistic religion we have to “glorify” God and it means
to give glory to Him, so look in the following muslim video how muslim
white people are glorifying God:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M3xjz4nxzGQ&list=RDBXBdyJitlRk&index=10

More philosophy about the nature of God..

I invite you to read the definition of being arrogant, here it is:

"Who is an arrogant person?

Arrogance can be defined as the personality trait whereby a person has
an obnoxiously elevated sense of self-worth. An arrogant person is the
one who acts as if they’re superior, more worthy, and more important
than others. Therefore, they tend to disrespect and put others down.
At the same time, they want admiration and respect from others. They
want to be appreciated for the great things they’ve done and for their special qualities and abilities."

And in my new monotheistic religion, God is "greatly" arrogant, it is
his "nature", this is why he can be indifferent to suffering of poor
animals and he can be indifferent to suffering of humans etc. and this
is why God likes from us to tell him that he is the greatest and the
most beautiful and such and this is why we have to believe in God and
fear him and ask him for help.

More of my philosophy about from where comes monotheistic religions..

I think many of the talking and writing of Qur'an and Bible are
from humans, i mean that God has not 100% guided prophet Muhammad
or Jesus Christ, so i think that God has let prophet
Muhammad writes and talks as a human in many of the parts of the Qur'an
with his human defects, and God has also let Jesus Christ talks as a
human not as a God with his human defects, I mean God had programmed
prophet Muhammad and Jesus Christ and he had let them talk and write in
the Bible and Qur'an as humans with there human defects, so God is the greatest, this is why we can notice that Jesus Christ has made mistakes
that look like mental health disorders, and i think it is part of the
curse from God and i think that the scientific errors and errors and
extremism in the Bible and Qur'an also come from the curse from God, and
the facts also prove that the most important thing for God is that we
believe in him and we fear him and we ask him for help, it is is the
basis of my monotheistic religion, and read more in the following web
link about my new monotheistic religion so that to understand(it is my preliminary thoughts and i will organize them much more efficiently and
make of them a pdf and html book):

https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/eaEbfSmu4is

More of my philosophy about the muslim persian philosopher Al-Ghazali..

https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/eaEbfSmu4is

I invite you to look at this interesting video about the persian muslim philosopher Al-Ghazali:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZL-ZxXQ6HCU

I am a philosopher and i say that those muslim phisosophers are really
smart, since i think that the persian philosopher Al-Ghazali was an
orthodox muslim but the Arab philosopher Ibn ʿArabi was not an orthodox muslim, but i am smart and i understand the muslim orthodoxy of the
persian philosopher Al-Ghazali that has shaped his philosophy that
you look at it in the above video, i think that you have to look at the
context of past time of the persian philosopher Al-Ghazali, i think
there was a requirement that is "dependent" on this context of past
time of the persian philosopher Al-Ghazali, and it is that we had to
strengthen the faith in God in the muslim orthodoxy way so that to avoid corruption of the minds that could hurt a lot muslim people of that
time, so i think that the "engine" of faith in God in the way of muslim orthodoxy was a so important engine, it is by logical analogy like my
following thoughts of my new monotheistic religion that makes you notice
how important is the "context":

More philosophy about my new monotheistic religion and the rich man..

So look at the following video of Jesus Christ:

Jesus and a Rich Man (Jesus teaches a Rich Man)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CS9kEvzYIIs


As you notice in the above video that Jesus Christ said to
the rich man to give all his money to the poors and he said to him
that he has to choose between serving the master that is God and
serving the master that is money. But i am your new prophet and i will
explain my new monotheistic religion:

You have to put the words of Jesus Christ in the "context" of the
past time when was living Jesus Christ, so you can easily
notice that in this past time of Jesus Christ, humans were very poor and
were living in a so bad conditions, so this is why Jesus Christ
was so "harsh" with the rich man, because to be able to be successful
you have to "prioritize", so as you are noticing that the high priority
in the time of Jesus Christ was that humans have needed to eat and
to survive the so difficult living conditions, so then the words of
Jesus Christ in the Bible are not timeless over this earth, because they
can be "restricted" to a particular time of the time of when Jesus
Christ was living over this earth.

Yet more philosophy about the Arab philosopher Ibn ʿArabi and more..

I invite you to look at the following interesting video of the Arab
philosopher Ibn ʿArabi:

Ibn 'Arabi & The Unity of Being

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-bgWnzjONXE

And read more about the philosopher Ibn ʿArabi here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ibn_Arabi

I think i am philosopher that looks like the Arab philosopher Ibn
ʿArabi, since Ibn ʿArabi has talked about the "Al-Insān al-kāmil" (The perfect man) by saying that he is a kind of "balance" between being of
both divine from God and earthly origin, and he said that when you
become faith in God it is that we become partly of God. I am saying the
same in my new monotheistic religion, so i invite you to read my
following thoughts of my new monotheistic religion so that to notice it
(it is my preliminary thoughts and i will organize them much more
efficiently and make of them a pdf and html book):

https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/eaEbfSmu4is

So i am a philosopher that is in accordance with Ibn Arabi that says
that the perfect man is this "balance" between being of both divine from
God and earthly origin, since it is like an important "engine", and
notice that i am also insisting in my below philosophy on this kind of "balance" that we have to have between competition and collaboration or cooperation, or between individualism and collectivism(that can
be logically inferred from the first), so i invite you to read all
my following thoughts of my philosophy so that to understand:

I invite you to read the following article about propositional logic:

https://analyticsindiamag.com/why-propositional-logic-is-the-foundation-for-artificial-intelligence/

As you notice it says:

"Propositional logic provides more efficient and scalable algorithms
than the other logics."

More of my philosophy about Propositional logic:

I invite you again to read the following definition of what is an
implication in logic:

https://www.britannica.com/topic/material-implication

Notice that it says that the logical implication of
(p implies q) has the same meaning as ((not p) or q)

But I think the above definition by using the meaning of ((not p) or q)
is not the right way, since the ((not p) or q) is the formulation that
is logically inferred from the truth table of the logical implication,
so i think we have to say the following:

The statement “p implies q” means that if p is true, then q
"must" also be true.

And we have to use the truth table of the logical implication as
the following:

p q p -> q
0 0 1
0 1 1
1 0 0
1 1 1

So notice that the table of truth gives all the possibilities,
but i think it fixes the possibility of causality by saying:

The statement “p implies q” means that if p is true, then q
"must" also be true.

And the other possibilities of the truth table do model the other possibilities.

So from the truth table we can easily get the following formulation of:

(p implies q) has the same meaning as ((not p) or q)

And in propositional logic we can use the following ways of logical proofs:

(p -> q) is equivalent to ((not(q) -> not(p))

Note: the symbol -> means implies and p and q are logical
variables.

or

(not(p) -> 0) is equivalent to p


And for fuzzy logic, here is the generalized form(that includes fuzzy
logic) for the three operators AND,OR,NOT:

x AND y is equivalent to min(x,y)
x OR y is equivalent to max(x,y)
NOT(x) is equivalent to (1 - x)

And I think mathematics describes reality or theory with a great
precision, this is also why we can "abstract" and/or "model" and/or
"simulate" reality or theory with mathematics, also i think that
mathematics can be independent of reality when we are working in
mathematical theory, but the mathematical theory that is independent of
reality can then be applied to reality, also i think that mathematics
permits to optimize and verify, and we can also know about it by for
example asking a philosophical question of: What is formal logic? ,
so i think formal logic maps logical expressions to logical variables
and to logical operators and from that it permits to logically model
with those logical variables and the logical operators and it permits to
solve and verify the logical model, and notice that the ways of logical
proofs above can permit to simplify the logical proof, so it can
bring and adds efficiency.

Here is my just new proverb in english and french and more..

Here is my new proverb in english and french:

"Learn to lift your head with dignity because even the sea has
threatening waves."

"Apprends à élever la tête avec dignité car même la mer a des vagues qui menacent."

And here is my other new proverbs read them carefully:

https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/w7wgcbkEEIQ

More philosophy about education and the forms of human communication..

I think that our societies are experiencing many changes,
among the many changes is that we are using multimedia
way of communicating like youtube, but if you notice
carefully this way of such youtube way is a form of human communication
that looks like an oral tradition that lacks good and precise thinking
and precise writing, so i think that we have to be careful since i think
that we have to "master" more the way of good and precise thinking
and precise writing so that to adapt correctly and efficiently,
so there is a "distinction" to be made about the form of human
communication, since i think that the form of good and precise thinking
and precise writing by also using hypertext and hyperlinks is the way to
go. So notice below how i am thinking and writing my philosophy with
a much more efficient way of doing since it is also technical and it is
a much more efficient and precise way of thinking and writing.

This is why i have also just said the following:

More of my philosophy about the hyperlink and hypertext revolution and
the web..

I think the best things that have happened to internet is
the exponential growth of data and information on internet(and it is
good for artificial intelligence) and the how it is organized
efficiently, i mean this hypertext and hyperlink way of organizing
information on internet is "so" powerful and i think it is what have revolutionized internet, here is the definition of hyperlink:

"A hyperlink is a word, phrase, or image that you can click on to jump
to a new document or a new section within the current document.
Hyperlinks are found in nearly all Web pages, allowing users to click
their way from page to page."

So this is why you have to be optimistic since i am also organizing my
thoughts of my philosophy and political philosophy more efficiently in
an hyperlink way too, but i will organize them much more efficiently as
a pdf and html book and you will be able to download them from my website.

So i am very optimistic about our world, since our humanity is
progressing in an exponential way, and data and information in internet
is growing in an exponential way, and our era of globalization has been characterized by the democratization of technology, democratization of
finance, and democratization of information, and economies of scale
resulted in the most affordable price of any product for the consumer
without the manufacturer having to sacrifice profits(and this economies
of scale needs globalization too) etc., so i think our world is becoming
much more powerful and efficient.

And read all my following thoughts about my philosophy as a philosopher:

More philosophy about the german philosopher Martin Heidegger..

I invite you to read the following article about the german philosopher
Martin Heidegger:

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/belief/2009/jun/05/heidegger-philosophy

I am a philosopher and i think that the german philosopher Martin
Heidegger is an inferior philosopher, so i invite you to read all my
following thoughts of my philosophy since i think that my philosophy
is superior to other philosophies of other philosophers:

More of my philosophy about the philosopher and economist Adam Smith and
more..

Are Robots Coming for Our Jobs? Careful, It’s a Trick Question

https://singularityhub.com/2019/07/22/will-robots-take-our-jobs-careful-its-a-trick-question/

And notice that it says the following:

"...Economic disparities have become more pronounced, with those at the
top of corporate ladders raking in the money while much of the workforce
sees no difference in earnings. These disparities (along with the
technologies themselves) have fed into political polarization and helped
fuel a rise in identity politics, nationalism, and the election of
strongmen."

But i think my following philosophy gives a solution to the above
problem, so i invite you to read all my following thoughts of my
philosophy to notice it:

More of my philosophy about egoism and competition and collaboration and cooperation..

I invite you to look at the following video:

Why is Communism So Appealing?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_0UAsaqaOc

I am not a communist, my political philosophy is different,
and i think my philosophy is better, and i am explaining it in
my below thoughts, i think that the philosophy of the philosopher and
economist Adam Smith was lacking on efficiency, since he said that
"Human egoism is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations"
and i think it is not true, simply because creativity and innovation
come not only from competition and its egoism, but they also come from
ideas circulating and combining across nations and industries(so they
need globalization), but egoism of competition is too much extremism
that hurts because it has also the tendency to make ideas not
circulating and combining efficiently across nations and industries, so
my philosophy says that we have to seek like a balance between
competition and collaboration or cooperation, and this needs also
collaboration and cooperation by sharing ideas and sharing knowledge and sharing PhD papers and sharing open source softwares etc. and here is my
new philosophy and model, read it carefully in my following thoughts:

More philosophy about the Scottish and economist and philosopher called
Adam Smith..

I invite you to look at the following video about Adam Smith:

ADAM SMITH - La main invisible

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OIvtWvDkkVk

You can read about Adam Smith here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Smith

I think that i am a philosopher that is smart, and i say that
the philosopher and economist Adam Smith was not right by saying the following(you
can listen to it in the above video):

"Human egoism is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations"

I think that Adam Smith is not right by saying so, since my new
philosophy and model says that you have to seek like a balance between collaboration or cooperation and competition(and egoism comes
from competition), my philosophy says that innovation and creativity
not only come from competition but it also come from ideas circulating
and combining across nations and industries(so they need globalization),
so in my philosophy creativity and innovation needs also collaboration
and cooperation by sharing ideas and sharing knowledge and sharing PhD
papers and sharing open source softwares etc. and here is my new
philosophy and model:

My today talk is about white supremacism and neo-nazism and the
far-right and nationalism.

So the first philosophical question is how to talk about
those above ideologies?

I think that it is also like a Mensa IQ test, so since i think i am
smart, i have to use my smartness to solve the Mensa IQ test, so when
you are smart, so how can you solve the problem(that is like a Mensa IQ
test) of those above ideologies ? i think that i have first to detect
the important pattern with my fluid intelligence, and i have to see
clearly the pattern(like for example getting into the details from the abstraction of the pattern), and the important pattern is the following:

Notice that it is like an optimization problem of artificial
intelligence that looks like PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization), it is
what we call Swarm intelligence, and in PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization)
there is what we call local optimization that we call exploitation, and
there is what we call global optimization that we call exploration(read
about PSO in my thoughts below so that to understand), so if PSO is not balanced correctly with exploitation and exploration it can not converge
to the global optimum, we say that PSO has to guarantee the optimal convergence, so if it is not correctly balanced with both exploitation
and exploration it can get stuck in a local maximum and not to converge
to global optimum, so then notice that with logical analogy, exploration
and exploitation of PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization) is in philosophy
like seeking the right balance between individualism and collectivism
that guarantees the optimal convergence like in PSO, or it is like
seeking the right balance between collaboration and competition that
guarantees the optimal convergence like in PSO, so then since the above ideologies are nationalism and nationalism is too much local
optimization and lack of global optimization , it is too much
competition and lack of collaboration or cooperation, so it is by
logical analogy like too much exploitation and lack of exploration in
PSO, so this is not good and here is how to notice it , read the following:

Read the following article about economic nationalism:

Rise of Economic Nationalism and Its Implications

https://www.lewisu.edu/experts/wordpress/index.php/rise-of-economic-nationalism-and-its-implications/


Notice that it says the following:


"Countries benefit with cooperation between countries to mutual benefit, becoming too nationalistic at the expense of its partners is
counterproductive. It is an approach that creates conflict. Being more nationalistic tends to be a zero sum game in an increasingly
interdependent world economy, where countries depend on other countries
for their economic and political and national security well being. When companies cooperate, they can become more competitive. When they are
more competitive, they hire more workers, pay higher salaries, and
otherwise contribute to economic growth. Economic nationalism is a bad
policy."

So a you are noticing that nationalism is not the right way to do.

This is why i also said the following:

More political philosophy about globalization and nationalism..

I am a white arab and i think i am more smart, so today i will
talk about a very important subject about Globalization and nationalism,
so i will invite you to look at the following video of Marine Le Pen of
the far-right political party in France:

Marine Le Pen explains why nationalism is important

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNpI9wKnE8Q

As you notice that Marine Le Pen is saying in french that the
fight today is between nationalism and globalization, since
Marine Le Pen says that globalization is a treat to national
identity and is a treat to national sovereignty, but i think that Marine
Le Pen is not understanding correctly globalization, since i think that nationalism is too much competition and communism and socialism is too
much collaboration , so i think the best way is to seek like a balance
between collaboration and competition and when we look
at globalization you will notice that we are collaborating with others
by for example sharing Open Source softwares or Free softwares or PhD
papers or knowledge on internet etc, and we are also competition by not collaborating with others, and with this new kind of model we are
noticing that we are not just one identity like being french, but we are becoming multiple identities because this kind of new model is making a
part of us that collaborate "universal", and this is why i think that
Marine Le Pen is not understanding correctly this new kind of model of
like seeking a balance between competition and collaboration , and i
think that this new model is better because it is more efficient ,
because i think this partly collaboration of this new model is good and
more efficient for creativity, innovation, adaptability and speed of
progress, i also think in capitalism the price of internet has gotten
cheap and the price of computers has gotten cheap, so we are able today
to access internet with a low price and benefit from "collaboration" and
also sharing in internet, for example look at me, i have invented many
scalable algorithms and i have decided to share some of them with the
others, and it is of course collaboration , so look for example at my

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)