• Here is my just new proverb and more.. (4/4)

    From World90@21:1/5 to All on Fri Apr 23 17:25:38 2021
    [continued from previous message]

    So as you have just noticed that my philosophy is a new philosophy that
    doesn't look like the others, and the architectural ideas of my
    philosophy are the following:

    There is an absolute and a relative way of measuring, so when we measure absolutely(i mean completely or totally) the meaning of human life, so
    like in the case of absurdism of the philosopher Albert Camus, we can
    say: "Absurdism arises out of the tension between our desire for order,
    meaning and happiness and, on the other hand, the indifferent natural universe’s refusal to provide that", hence when we are measuring
    absolutely the meaning of life, we can say that human life is absurd,
    but the question in philosophy is: Is human life absurd? In my
    philosophy human life is not absurd, because i say that happiness comes
    from enjoying pleasures of life that we feel with our senses we humans,
    and i am also defining the human sense as the one that comes from the
    brain and from consciousness that gives pleasure, i mean
    that when you are "learning" by looking at a video on youtube it can
    give a pleasure inside your brain that comes from the brain and from consciousness, so when you are happiness by enjoying pleasures
    of life with your human senses, you are enjoying life and you are
    not thinking about the "absolute" meaning of human life, but the meaning
    of human life becomes "relative", and since it becomes this relativeness
    so human life becomes not absurd, since this enjoying pleasures of life
    with our human senses is "like" a powerful "drug" that permit to be
    happy and to not to be preoccupied with the absolute meaning of human
    life that is talking about the philosopher Albert Camus.

    More about my philosophy and about human existence..

    I think that i am a philosopher that is smart, and now i will explain
    more my philosophy so that you understand it:

    Our era of globalization has been characterized by the democratization
    of technology, democratization of finance, and democratization of
    information, and from where do you think comes this progress ?
    i think it comes from the "exponential" progress of our humanity, and
    you have to understand this exponential progress of our humanity
    correctly by reading my below thoughts, other than that i think that
    those democratization of technology, democratization of finance, and democratization of information have like democratized
    happiness too, i mean that before those democratizations brought
    by the exponential progress of our humanity, Lower social class
    and lower middle class had to be rich to be able to be happy,
    because we were lacking technology and lacking tools that permit
    to be happy without being rich, so this is why humanity was much more
    violent because the not rich was violently fighting the rich etc. so we
    had violent ideologies like communism and nazism etc. but i think that
    today with the big advancement of technology and science etc. we are
    able to be happy without being rich, and read my below thoughts to
    understand how and to understand my philosophy about it, and read my
    following thoughts about democratization of technology, democratization
    of finance, and democratization of information so that you understand more:

    And look at the following video:

    Why Israel is a Tech Capital of the World

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RuPx61911Oo

    I think that this jewish from Israel that is talking in the above video
    is not thinking correctly, because there is two important things that
    you must have so that a country be successful: Capital and talents, the
    above video is making a mistake by saying that you need the two so that
    to be successful, i mean it is saying that you need Capital and talents,
    but i think he is making a mistake, because i think that Capital can
    attract talents, so Capital can make you successful as a country, so
    then i can logically infer that so that to have capital that make you successful, you have to know how to construct a product or services that
    you can sell from those competitive advantages of competitive part or
    parts of product or service that can come from you or/and can come from different countries of the global world, and it is i think an efficient
    way that makes you adapt quickly and efficiently in this globalization,
    and notice with me that having competitive part or parts of a product or service doesn't mean it has to come from R&D(Research and development),
    also the above video of the jewish from Israel is not saying that
    Capital can come from "democratization" of finance, since
    you have to know that our global world has changed very much by being democratization of technology, democratization of finance, and
    democratization of information, read my following thoughts so that you
    also understand that Capital also comes from democratization of finance:

    More about "democratization" of finance..

    This "democratization" of finance is also for Research and Development
    (R&D))..

    And look at the following "democratization" of finance so that to
    understand:

    The 4 tools making capital more abundant than it’s ever been

    Read more here:

    https://singularityhub.com/2018/07/19/the-4-tools-making-capital-more-abundant-than-its-ever-been/


    About democratization of digital technology and technology and Research
    and Development (R&D) investment

    This is also why i said the following:

    Look at the following interesting video:

    Can South Korea lead global innovation in Fourth Industrial Era?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XUw8gCShEcI


    But i think that this minister of education, science and technology
    of south Korea looks somewhat archaic since he is not taking correctly
    into account the democratization of digital technology and Technology
    that permits you to economically grow very rapidly and much cheaply than
    using "expensive" Research and Development (R&D) investment, so i think
    that he is not correctly adapting to the realities, because the economic realities have very much changed, since also our era of globalization
    has been characterized by the democratization of technology,
    democratization of finance, and democratization of information.

    Here is more proof of what i am saying:


    2. Question: What do you mean by “Democratizing Innovation”?

    Eric von Hippel:

    The tools for designing high-quality innovations are getting so cheap
    and so ubiquitous that individuals can innovate for themselves at a
    steadily higher quality and at a steadily decreasing cost. These
    sophisticated modern tools are computer-based, and require relatively
    little training and practice. As a result, even hobbyist users find they
    can use them to design new products and services.

    Read more here:

    Democratizing Innovation: The Shift of Innovation to Users

    https://www.ideaconnection.com/interviews/00010-Democratizing-Innovation-The-Shift-of-Innovation.html


    More precision about more of my philosophy about indian meditation and
    about my philosophy..


    I invite you to look at the following video about indian meditation:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HHelfPFLXbs


    I don't agree with indian meditation that wants us to stop seeking
    pleasure of the senses, i think that indian meditation wants like
    to solve the problem of materialism that causes problems such as
    violence between the rich and not rich etc. but i think that my
    philosophy is much better than indian meditation, so i invite
    you to read it again carefully, and notice that the following
    webpage is defining the human senses as the following:

    The Five (and More) Senses

    https://www.livescience.com/60752-human-senses.html


    But i think that i am also defining the human sense as the one that
    comes from the brain and from consciousness that gives pleasure, i mean
    that when you are "learning" by looking at a video on youtube it can
    give a pleasure inside your brain that comes from the brain and from consciousness.

    So read my following philosophy that i think is much better than indian meditation:

    Yet more philosophy about my philosophy..

    I think that i am a philosopher that is smart, and i will ask
    a question:

    From where comes violence between peoples and between individuals ?

    For example if a man has a big penis and another man has a small or
    average penis they can get in violent fight between them because of this inequality.

    Or if a man is rich and another man is not rich they can get into a
    violent fight between them because of this inequality.

    etc.

    So now my philosophy is smart and it is saying that so that the rich
    and the not rich not get into a violent fight because of inequality of
    richness etc. we have to know from where "happiness" comes from and we
    have to know that we can be happy without being rich by doing the
    following, read my following thoughts to understand:

    More philosophy about being materialistic and not being materialistic..


    I will ask a smart question:

    Am i a philosopher that is a materialistic ?

    No, i am not materialistic , i am a philosopher that is seeking like a "balance" between being materialistic and not being materialistic , and
    i am pragmatic, i will give you an example so that you understand my philosophy:

    I think that looking at the videos of youtube is like being not
    materialistic, since a video on youtube is like the immaterial, so then
    you can enjoy those pleasures of life on internet by looking at the
    videos of youtube or by reading facebook etc. by being not
    materialistic, so then i am a philosopher that is convinced that we can
    be happy even if we are not "rich", since with the sophistication of
    internet and such tools, i say that we can be happy without being rich
    by accessing internet and enjoying pleasures of life of internet and
    such tools with a very low price, and what i predict that in about 10
    years from now, and with the exponential progress of our humanity, we
    will be happy and much more happy without being rich since this
    exponential progress will provide us with much more powerful tools that
    enhance much more the quality of our lives.

    Read all my following my previous thoughts to understand more:

    I think i am smart and i say that we have to be optimistic,
    because happiness comes from enjoying pleasures of life that we feel
    with our senses we humans, but my philosophy says that you can be happy
    by not being rich and you can be happy by being rich, since notice
    with me that today enjoying pleasures of life is also the fact that
    we are accessing internet and taking advantage of looking at youtube or
    reading facebook or searching and learning from Google etc. with a very
    low price, and computers today cost a low price too, so i think that
    we are being much more happy by enjoying those pleasures of life by
    accessing internet at a very low price, this is why i think that
    the exponential progress of our humanity will very soon, and in about 10
    years from now, enhance much much more our lives by providing us
    with very sophisticated tools, but we have to know how to manage this exponential progress of our humanity and we have also to be efficiently educated so that to be much better humans and so that Democracy works correctly, so this is why you have to take into account this exponential progress of our humanity, and read all my following thoughts to
    understand better:

    More of my philosophy about Eric Schmidt and about quantum computing and
    about Moore's law..

    I invite you to look carefully at this interesting Eric Schmidt's video:

    Read about Eric Schmidt here:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Schmidt

    So look at his following video:

    Eric Schmidt on the Early Strategic Decisions & Future of Quantum Computing

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wjG1fl6Ezdg

    But in the video above i don't agree with Eric Schmidt about the end of
    Moore's law, because look at the following discovery below that will
    permit computers and phones to run thousands of times faster, so read
    carefully my following thoughts to understand:

    More of my philosophy about the exponential progress of our humanity..

    I think that the white supremacists and neo-nazis and many humans are
    not understanding correctly the exponential progress of our
    humanity, so notice in my following news that the exponential progress
    of our humanity is now going much faster and faster, so look for example
    at the new discovery below that will permit computers and phones to run thousands of times faster, so you are noticing that it will make
    artificial intelligence and such be much more powerful, so i think we
    will soon be able to enhance much more our human genetics and we will
    be able to do much more than that because the exponential progress of
    our humanity will make us soon really much much more powerful, so we
    have to be much more optimistic, so you have to read my following
    thoughts below about the exponential progress of our humanity and you
    have to read my following news below:

    More political philosophy about: Are humans smart ?

    So are humans smart ?


    I am very positive about humans, and i think that humans are smart,
    since we are also advancing by the following process of Swarm
    Intelligence that is so efficient, read about it here:


    How Swarm Intelligence Is Making Simple Tech Much Smarter


    https://singularityhub.com/2018/02/08/how-swarm-intelligence-is-making-simple-tech-much-smarter/


    So i think that "collectively", we humans, we are smart, and i think
    that you will soon notice it by the following exponential progress of
    our humanity, read about in my following thoughts:


    More political philosophy about do we have to be pessimistic..


    I think it is a beautiful day in history, and how can you understand it ?


    First you will notice that the exponential progress of our humanity is
    going very fast and is going faster and faster , look at the following
    video to understand it:


    Exponential Progress: Can We Expect Mind-Blowing Changes In The Near Future


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfM5HXpfnJQ&t=144s


    So as you are noticing that you have to take this exponential progress
    of our humanity into account and be much more optimistic.


    And you have to know that this exponential progress of our humanity also
    comes from the following process:


    How Swarm Intelligence Is Making Simple Tech Much Smarter


    https://singularityhub.com/2018/02/08/how-swarm-intelligence-is-making-simple-tech-much-smarter/


    And here is my new poem called: "This beautiful exponential progress is
    not a distress"


    --


    This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress


    Because it is a beautiful maturity but not the adolescence


    This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress


    And we have to beautifully tune it with the beautiful consensus


    This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress


    So let us not be just guesses but technicality and science


    This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress


    So let us be a beautiful expressiveness that is not helpless


    This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress


    So let us take together this beautiful breakfast


    This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress


    Since you are also like my so beautiful Princess


    This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress


    So let us be a beautiful presence for present and future acceptance


    --


    Read my following news:


    With the following new discovery computers and phones could run
    thousands of times faster..

    Prof Alan Dalton in the School of Mathematical and Physics Sciences at
    the University of Sussex, said:

    "We're mechanically creating kinks in a layer of graphene. It's a bit
    like nano-origami.

    "Using these nanomaterials will make our computer chips smaller and
    faster. It is absolutely critical that this happens as computer
    manufacturers are now at the limit of what they can do with traditional semiconducting technology. Ultimately, this will make our computers and
    phones thousands of times faster in the future.

    "This kind of technology -- "straintronics" using nanomaterials as
    opposed to electronics -- allows space for more chips inside any device. Everything we want to do with computers -- to speed them up -- can be
    done by crinkling graphene like this."

    Dr Manoj Tripathi, Research Fellow in Nano-structured Materials at the University of Sussex and lead author on the paper, said:

    "Instead of having to add foreign materials into a device, we've shown
    we can create structures from graphene and other 2D materials simply by
    adding deliberate kinks into the structure. By making this sort of
    corrugation we can create a smart electronic component, like a
    transistor, or a logic gate."

    The development is a greener, more sustainable technology. Because no additional materials need to be added, and because this process works at
    room temperature rather than high temperature, it uses less energy to
    create.

    Read more here:

    https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/02/210216100141.htm



    More philosophy about how to be successful..

    I have talked more about how to be successful(read my thoughts below
    about it), but i think that you have to know about the ingredients that
    bring success, and the most important ingredients that bring success is
    to find the engines that push us forward towards more and more
    perfection, and notice that if you say to people to work better and to
    study better, it is not the way, since you have to tell wich engines
    push us forward towards more and more perfection, for example
    one very important engine that pushes us forward towards more and more perfection is to have the "positive spirit" so that to successful, so
    when a people have the tendency to have a positive spirit , it is a kind
    of positive energy that pushes us forward towards more and more
    perfection, so it is also an engine, so when you are smart you will
    notice that you have to find what are the engines that push us
    forward towards more and more perfection because it is so important,
    for example there is other engines that push us forward towards
    more and more perfection and here is some of my philosophical thoughts
    about morality that talk about them, here they are, and read them carefully:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/7UmkfURwoU4

    Also read here my other thoughts of my philosophy that talks about other engines that push us forward towards more and more perfection:

    https://scalable68.godaddysites.com/f/my-philosophy-about-human-existence

    So as you are noticing by reading my philosophy that it is
    a smart way of doing..

    More philosophy about what is a language and what is a human meaning..

    I think i am a philosopher and i will talk today about what is a
    language and what is a human meaning:

    So as you have just noticed i have just posted yesterday a new proverb
    about what is a language etc.(read below about it), but you will notice
    that there is many languages like the language of Love and language of technicality and the english language etc. but what is more important is
    the meaning behind the language, since i think that the meaning precedes
    the language, so this meaning behind the language is what makes us
    conscious about ourselves and about life, so we can go further and
    ask a philosophical question of what is this meaning behind the
    language? i think that humans come with there feelings with there human
    senses, and those feelings is what gives also joy and happiness to
    humans, and feelings with our human senses is also part of the "set"
    that we call meaning of the language, since we are feeling what is time,
    like for example this comes before this or this comes after that, and
    this also permits us to understand logic and fuzzy logic, also we are
    feeling with our human senses what is space and matter and this permits
    us to understand much more clearly what is a human body and what is
    life, and i think that our feelings with our human senses are what
    gives consciousness, so i think that our kind of human consciousness is
    also partly biologic that comes from our human senses, so i think
    this is the main part that permits our smartness to be effective
    in an open system and it permits also to use much less data than
    artificial intelligence (AI), so i think that it is not like deep
    learning and AI.

    More philosophy about what is a language and about my new proverbs..

    As you have just noticed i have just written a new proverb
    and here is my new proverb:

    "One very important sign of a wise man is that he knows how to use the appropriate language to talk to people, but does he needs to use only
    one language with "people"? no, he has to know how to use different
    languages to talk to people, for example when he talks to the birds he
    uses the language of the birds, so he has to know how to be efficient at
    that."

    So notice that it is a smart proverb, since i am also saying in my new
    proverb the following:

    "..for example when he talks to the birds he uses the language of the
    birds.."

    So as you notice that it is also making it clear that a language
    is not only like the spoken english language, since it can also mean the language of the heart(or of Love) or the language of technicality etc."

    And here is my other new proverbs, read them carefully:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/FPdu0B9_Vlc

    And here is my new poems of Love that use smartly the language of the
    heart(or of Love):

    About Van Morrison and my poems of Love..

    I invite you to listen to the following one of the best music of Van
    Morrison, since i am also a musician and i know what is music..

    Van Morrison - Caledonia Soul Music

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1ecN3rOoFQ

    And i invite you to read at the same time my following
    poems of Love:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/IkAbxVqWD8M



    Here is what my political philosophy says about Democracy..

    More political philosophy about Democracy and Morality..

    I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have also invented
    many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

    And now i will start by asking a philosophical question:

    Is Democracy morality ?

    I will say that Morality is about exactness and how to be the exact
    perfection, note that the English dictionary defines "perfection" as:
    "the act or process of perfecting", read here to notice it:

    https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perfection

    And Democracy is a mechanism that permits to avoid corruption of
    morality and corruption of morality is also lack of efficiency and it is extremism that hurts Democracy, and Democracy doesn't mean that people
    have to govern, because it is absurdity, but Democracy is the "tool" of Morality, since morality wants to be the exact perfection , this is why
    it needs Democracy, and Morality or society have to be "progressive",
    read my following writing of my political philosophy about morality to
    know that they have to be progressive:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/7UmkfURwoU4

    And we can say the following:

    The classical notion of decentralization does not necessarily imply
    democracy, and an organization may be decentralized without being based
    on democratic principles.

    But i ask a smart question of:

    Can we say that an organization based on democratic principles may be centralized ?

    Here is my answer:

    But we can notice that even though decentralization doesn't necessarily
    imply Democracy, Democracy is a "kind" of decentralization, and this
    kind of decentralization brings efficiency because we can notice that
    Democracy needs requirements such as competitive elections and free
    press, and i think that Democracy is more efficient than Dictatorship at fighting corruption(and corruption can mean lack of efficiency), read
    my following thoughts about Democracy and more to understand:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Nudyb_4QCRU


    More political philosophy about Democracy and parliamentary Democracy..


    Wich is better, Democracy or parliamentary Democracy ?


    When you are smart you will notice that parliamentary Democracy is
    better since Democracy means that the people "govern", but this way of
    doing brings desorder, since people doesn't mean that it is Elites that govern, so this is why i think that it is inherent to parliamentary
    democracy that it is the Elites that govern and guide people, since
    also we can logically prove it by saying the following:

    From where people get a correct judgment in Democracy ?

    So you are noticing that to be able to be good judgment in Democracy,
    you have to be correct "Elitism" that guides people, and you have to be Meritocracy to be able to be the necessary quality or perfection, but
    then you are noticing that to be able to be Meritocracy there must be a
    reward for the merit, by for example rewarding by giving more money.

    But since i am smart i will ask another important philosophical
    question, and it is the following:

    Does parliamentary democracy has requirements, and wich requirements it has:

    From my above logical proof we can say that the first requirement of parliamentary democracy is: it is the Elites that must govern and guide people, and from the first requirement we can logically infer that the
    Elites must be competent, so we can logically infer the since they have
    to be competent so then we can say the the second requirement of
    parliamentary democracy that it must be meritocratic, and the third
    requirement of parliamentary democracy is also an important requirement
    and it is that we have to have a constitution that says that
    parliamentary democracy has to have law enforcement agencies like the
    USA FBI and military as necessary basic requirements for a country, and
    a country can become a more global world like European union or such.

    More political philosophy about the mechanisms of Democracy..

    I think that we have to be smart, since i have just written the
    following about China and Russia of year 2010 and 2012:


    ----


    More about China and Russia and other such countries education system..

    I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many
    scalable algorithms, read the following:


    “Corruption is pervasive in every part of Chinese society, and education
    is no exception,” Mr. Li said.

    A Chinese Education, for a Price

    Read more here:


    https://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/22/world/asia/in-china-schools-a-culture-of-bribery-spreads.html


    I think we can not be confident with the Chinese education system, and i
    don't think it is meritocratic !

    It is the same problem in Russia, read the following to notice it:

    Mark Levin, a professor at the Higher School of Economics in Moscow who
    has studied the issue, said corruption in universities took place not
    only during the entrance examinations but also those at the end of
    semesters. Levin said some students preferred to pay money to pass
    examinations and obtain a diploma.

    RUSSIA: Rising corruption threatens universities

    Read more here:

    https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20100514205552600#:~:text=According%20to%20necessarily%20rough%20estimates,in%202009%20totalled%20%241%20billion.&text=But%2C%20despite%20the%20country's%20increased,much%20the%20salaries%20actually%
    20are.

    ----


    And also i have just posted about the today China after the
    anti-corruption compaign in China, read the following:


    ---


    I invite you to read the following interesting article:

    China’s Anti-Corruption Campaign and the Challenges of Political Meritocracy

    https://americanaffairsjournal.org/2020/05/chinas-anti-corruption-campaign-and-the-challenges-of-political-meritocracy/


    ---


    So as you are noticing from my above writing that corruption can corrupt
    the education system and when education system is corrupt then the
    Meritocratic system is corrupt and this is dangerous. So even after the anti-corruption compaign in China , i think that Dictatorship of China
    is not so efficient at fighting corruption, because Democracy is much
    better at fighting corruption by competitive elections and free press,
    read my following thoughts to understand more:

    From where people get a correct judgment in Democracy ?

    So you are noticing that to be able to be good judgment in Democracy,
    you have to be correct "Elitism" that guides people, and you have to be Meritocracy to be able to be the necessary quality or pe