• Re: The Most Influential Sci-Fi Books Of All Time

    From Don@21:1/5 to Lynn McGuire on Sat Oct 16 14:43:30 2021
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.written

    Lynn McGuire wrote:
    Tony Nance wrote:
    I just ran across this article about an hour ago - it was published
    two days ago:
    https://bookriot.com/the-most-influential-sci-fi-books-of-all-time/

    <snip>

    The fact that the list does not mention Perry Rhodan, David Weber, or
    John Ringo makes the list very suspect in my mind.

    Popularity's probably positively correlated to influence. And
    _Perry Rhodan_ is the most popular science fiction ever, with over two
    billion novellas sold. Bubonicon's a takeoff on a PR character named Gucky/Pucky. PR's matter transmitter's appeared years before Star Trek's transporters. PR's spherical space ships debuted decades before Star
    Wars' Death Star.
    George Lucas supposedly said the American translation of PR was an "inspiration, less strong than Flash Gordon, but it influenced the
    design of many starships of Star Wars." Unfortunately the translated
    Lucas quote seems absent from the two sources typically cited: [1][2]
    The above situation brings to mind the time a friend of mine
    mentioned how a set of data was treated as gospel in medical journals
    for decades. Until someone actually replicated the original experiment
    and ended up with different data.

    It surprises me to learn Robin Cook belongs to a rarefied club of
    authors with nearly 400 million books sold. Steven King's in the club,
    as well is James Patterson (who's relatively unknown to me).
    Robin Cook grinds an axe with his fiction. He writes to influence
    others.
    His faintly fictional first novel, _The Year of the Intern_, bombed.
    So he upped his game. He brilliantly reverse engineered a formula out of _Jaws_, _Love Story_, and other best sellers, then used it to create his
    own best seller, his first of many: _Coma_.

    What a shock: Robin Cook fuses stem cells with a suspenseful tale

    Robin Cook's latest medical thriller may seem like yet
    another example of the author's uncanny ability to anticipate
    national controversy, in this case the uproar over federal
    funding for embryonic stem cell research. After all, the
    Harvard-trained medical doctor-turned-novelist has been
    writing well ahead of the public-debate curve since his
    breakout novel, Coma, nearly 25 years ago. ...
    Cook admits the timing of Shock was fortuitous. "I
    suppose you could say that it's the most like Coma in that
    it deals with an issue that everybody seems to be concerned
    about," he says. "I wrote this book to address the stem cell
    issue, which the public really doesn't know anything about.
    Besides entertaining readers, my main goal is to get people
    interested in some of these issues, because it's the public
    that ultimately really should decide which way we ought to
    go in something as ethically questioning as stem cell
    research." ...
    And after 23 books, he has come up with a diagnosis to
    explain why his medical thrillers remain so popular.
    "The main reason is, we all realize we're at risk. We're
    all going to be patients at some time," he says. "You can
    write about great white sharks or haunted houses, and you
    can say I'm not going in the ocean or I'm not going in
    haunted houses, but you can't say you're not going to go in
    a hospital." [3]

    Formulas fascinate me. One of these days its my intention to reverse
    engineer Levinson and Link's formula out of the first half dozen seasons
    of _Colombo_.
    The checklist enumerated in "Is it possible to write a best-selling
    novel simply by following a formula?" [4] contains a lot of elements
    found in the typical Cook:

    1. The hero is an expert.
    2. The villain is an expert.
    3. You must watch all of the villainy over the shoulder of
    the villain.
    4. The hero has a team of experts in various fields behind
    him, etc.
    5. Two or more on the team must fall in love.
    6. Two or more on the team must die.
    7. The villain must turn his attentions from his initial goal
    to the team.
    8. The villain and the hero must live to do battle again in
    the sequel.
    9. All deaths must proceed from the individual to the group:
    i.e., never say that the bomb exploded and 15,000 people
    were killed. Start with "Jamie and Suzy were walking in
    the park with their grandmother when the earth opened up."
    10. If you get bogged down, just kill somebody.

    Then there's Lester Dent's formula. [5]

    "There are three rules for writing the novel. Unfortunately, no
    one knows what they are." - W. Somerset Maugham

    Note.

    [1] https://books.google.com/books?id=cKLlUnyG4IQC&pg=PA342
    [2] https://www.handelsblatt.com/panorama/aus-aller-welt/science-fiction-serie-aus-rastatt-soll-verfilmt-werden-perry-rhodan-fordert-darth-vader-zum-duell-seite-2/2504942-2.html
    [3] https://web.archive.org/web/20071016063803/http://www.bookpage.com/0109bp/robin_cook.html
    [4] https://www.huffpost.com/entry/how-to-write-a-bestseller-formula_b_1542587 [5] https://steegerbooks.com/lester-dent-and-the-master-fiction-plot/

    --
    Don.......My cat's )\._.,--....,'``. https://crcomp.net/reviews.php telltale tall tail /, _.. \ _\ (`._ ,.
    tells tall tales.. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Christian Weisgerber@21:1/5 to Don on Sat Oct 16 18:22:45 2021
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.written

    On 2021-10-16, Don <g@crcomp.net> wrote:

    Popularity's probably positively correlated to influence. And
    _Perry Rhodan_ is the most popular science fiction ever, with over two billion novellas sold. Bubonicon's a takeoff on a PR character named Gucky/Pucky. PR's matter transmitter's appeared years before Star Trek's transporters. PR's spherical space ships debuted decades before Star
    Wars' Death Star.

    I think PR's influence on Anglo-American SF is approximately zero.
    And a good rule of thumb is that _nothing_ in PR is original. It's
    all been seen before. (Which does not preclude independent
    reinvention.)

    _The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction_ traces matter transmission
    to the 19th century.

    I vaguely remember von Däniken explaining that a sphere is the
    logical shape for a space-ship. That idea must have been around
    for a long time. (And is completely irrelevant at the level of
    magic technology in PR.)

    The influence of PR on _German_ SF is another matter. That article
    about the problems of translating PR into English... https://nedludssocks.blogspot.com/2013/04/english-translations-of-perry-rhodan.html
    ... made me wonder to which degree PR has actually shaped German
    SF vocabulary.

    There were of course some attempts in Germany to duplicate the
    success of PR, with _Ren Dhark_ (1966-69) being the most successful
    at 98 installments. And _Die Terranauten_ (1979-81, 99 installments
    plus some paperback sequels) was explicitly created as an "anti-Perry
    Rhodan story".

    George Lucas supposedly said the American translation of PR was an "inspiration, less strong than Flash Gordon, but it influenced the
    design of many starships of Star Wars." Unfortunately the translated
    Lucas quote seems absent from the two sources typically cited: [1][2]
    The above situation brings to mind the time a friend of mine
    mentioned how a set of data was treated as gospel in medical journals
    for decades.

    There was a bit of a kerfuffle a number of years back when somebody
    noticed that the length of the river Rhine as given in encyclopedias,
    text books, etc. was simply wrong, and this was traced back to a
    transposition of two digits (1230 > 1320 km) that steadily spread
    through all those carefully fact-checked reputable sources *cough*.

    --
    Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From smw@21:1/5 to Christian Weisgerber on Sat Oct 16 20:31:27 2021
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.written

    In <slrnsmm63l.10nr.naddy@lorvorc.mips.inka.de>
    Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> writes:

    There was a bit of a kerfuffle a number of years back when somebody
    noticed that the length of the river Rhine as given in encyclopedias,
    text books, etc. was simply wrong, and this was traced back to a >transposition of two digits (1230 > 1320 km) that steadily spread
    through all those carefully fact-checked reputable sources *cough*.

    This is related to the phenomenon of citogenesis, as explained by xkcd:

    https://xkcd.com/978/

    xkcd has something relevant to say about almost anything. :-)

    - Steven
    --
    ___________________________________________________________________________ Steven Winikoff |
    Montreal, QC, Canada | For clarity in writing, be careful about smw@smwonline.ca | word selection. For example, never
    http://smwonline.ca | utilize 'utilize' when you can use 'use'.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Robert Woodward@21:1/5 to Christian Weisgerber on Sat Oct 16 22:00:32 2021
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.written

    In article <slrnsmm63l.10nr.naddy@lorvorc.mips.inka.de>,
    Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> wrote:

    On 2021-10-16, Don <g@crcomp.net> wrote:

    Popularity's probably positively correlated to influence. And
    _Perry Rhodan_ is the most popular science fiction ever, with over two billion novellas sold. Bubonicon's a takeoff on a PR character named Gucky/Pucky. PR's matter transmitter's appeared years before Star Trek's transporters. PR's spherical space ships debuted decades before Star
    Wars' Death Star.

    I think PR's influence on Anglo-American SF is approximately zero.
    And a good rule of thumb is that _nothing_ in PR is original. It's
    all been seen before. (Which does not preclude independent
    reinvention.)

    _The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction_ traces matter transmission
    to the 19th century.

    I vaguely remember von Däniken explaining that a sphere is the
    logical shape for a space-ship. That idea must have been around
    for a long time. (And is completely irrelevant at the level of
    magic technology in PR.)

    The warships in various H. Beam Piper's stories (_Space Viking_ as well
    as stories set in the Federation era and in the Empire Era) were
    spherical. For that matter, IIRC, the title spaceship in _Skylark of
    Valeron_ was also spherical.

    --
    "We have advanced to new and surprising levels of bafflement."
    Imperial Auditor Miles Vorkosigan describes progress in _Komarr_. —-----------------------------------------------------
    Robert Woodward robertaw@drizzle.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dimensional Traveler@21:1/5 to Robert Woodward on Sat Oct 16 22:14:28 2021
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.written

    On 10/16/2021 10:00 PM, Robert Woodward wrote:
    In article <slrnsmm63l.10nr.naddy@lorvorc.mips.inka.de>,
    Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> wrote:

    On 2021-10-16, Don <g@crcomp.net> wrote:

    Popularity's probably positively correlated to influence. And
    _Perry Rhodan_ is the most popular science fiction ever, with over two
    billion novellas sold. Bubonicon's a takeoff on a PR character named
    Gucky/Pucky. PR's matter transmitter's appeared years before Star Trek's >>> transporters. PR's spherical space ships debuted decades before Star
    Wars' Death Star.

    I think PR's influence on Anglo-American SF is approximately zero.
    And a good rule of thumb is that _nothing_ in PR is original. It's
    all been seen before. (Which does not preclude independent
    reinvention.)

    _The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction_ traces matter transmission
    to the 19th century.

    I vaguely remember von Däniken explaining that a sphere is the
    logical shape for a space-ship. That idea must have been around
    for a long time. (And is completely irrelevant at the level of
    magic technology in PR.)

    The warships in various H. Beam Piper's stories (_Space Viking_ as well
    as stories set in the Federation era and in the Empire Era) were
    spherical. For that matter, IIRC, the title spaceship in _Skylark of
    Valeron_ was also spherical.

    IIRC spheres give the most volume with the least surface area.

    --
    I've done good in this world. Now I'm tired and just want to be a cranky
    dirty old man.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. Clarke@21:1/5 to dtravel@sonic.net on Sun Oct 17 02:07:18 2021
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.written

    On Sat, 16 Oct 2021 22:14:28 -0700, Dimensional Traveler
    <dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:

    On 10/16/2021 10:00 PM, Robert Woodward wrote:
    In article <slrnsmm63l.10nr.naddy@lorvorc.mips.inka.de>,
    Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> wrote:

    On 2021-10-16, Don <g@crcomp.net> wrote:

    Popularity's probably positively correlated to influence. And
    _Perry Rhodan_ is the most popular science fiction ever, with over two >>>> billion novellas sold. Bubonicon's a takeoff on a PR character named
    Gucky/Pucky. PR's matter transmitter's appeared years before Star Trek's >>>> transporters. PR's spherical space ships debuted decades before Star
    Wars' Death Star.

    I think PR's influence on Anglo-American SF is approximately zero.
    And a good rule of thumb is that _nothing_ in PR is original. It's
    all been seen before. (Which does not preclude independent
    reinvention.)

    _The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction_ traces matter transmission
    to the 19th century.

    I vaguely remember von Däniken explaining that a sphere is the
    logical shape for a space-ship. That idea must have been around
    for a long time. (And is completely irrelevant at the level of
    magic technology in PR.)

    The warships in various H. Beam Piper's stories (_Space Viking_ as well
    as stories set in the Federation era and in the Empire Era) were
    spherical. For that matter, IIRC, the title spaceship in _Skylark of
    Valeron_ was also spherical.

    IIRC spheres give the most volume with the least surface area.

    Cavor's space ship in Wells' 1901 "The First Men in the Moon" is
    spherical. The Chapter 3 title is "The Building of the Sphere". I'm
    fairly sure that some of Doc Smith's space ships were spherical.

    With regard to teleportation, google "Kefitzat Haderech", which I
    believe predates Christianity. There's also Wagner's Tarnhelm. If
    you need something explicitly science-fictional try "The Man Without a
    Body" from 1877. Or Clarke's first published story, "Travel by Wire!"
    from 1937. Or for something well known that predates Perry Rhodan,
    try Heinlein's 1955 "Tunnel in the Sky". It also appeared in several
    movies starting in 1939, including the 1953 Merrie Melodies "Duck
    Dodgers", and 1958's "The Fly".

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jerry Brown@21:1/5 to jclarke.873638@gmail.com on Sun Oct 17 15:49:45 2021
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.written

    On Sun, 17 Oct 2021 02:07:18 -0400, J. Clarke
    <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Sat, 16 Oct 2021 22:14:28 -0700, Dimensional Traveler
    <dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:

    On 10/16/2021 10:00 PM, Robert Woodward wrote:
    In article <slrnsmm63l.10nr.naddy@lorvorc.mips.inka.de>,
    Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> wrote:

    On 2021-10-16, Don <g@crcomp.net> wrote:

    Popularity's probably positively correlated to influence. And
    _Perry Rhodan_ is the most popular science fiction ever, with over two >>>>> billion novellas sold. Bubonicon's a takeoff on a PR character named >>>>> Gucky/Pucky. PR's matter transmitter's appeared years before Star Trek's >>>>> transporters. PR's spherical space ships debuted decades before Star >>>>> Wars' Death Star.

    I think PR's influence on Anglo-American SF is approximately zero.
    And a good rule of thumb is that _nothing_ in PR is original. It's
    all been seen before. (Which does not preclude independent
    reinvention.)

    _The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction_ traces matter transmission
    to the 19th century.

    I vaguely remember von Däniken explaining that a sphere is the
    logical shape for a space-ship. That idea must have been around
    for a long time. (And is completely irrelevant at the level of
    magic technology in PR.)

    The warships in various H. Beam Piper's stories (_Space Viking_ as well
    as stories set in the Federation era and in the Empire Era) were
    spherical. For that matter, IIRC, the title spaceship in _Skylark of
    Valeron_ was also spherical.

    IIRC spheres give the most volume with the least surface area.

    Cavor's space ship in Wells' 1901 "The First Men in the Moon" is
    spherical. The Chapter 3 title is "The Building of the Sphere". I'm
    fairly sure that some of Doc Smith's space ships were spherical.

    With regard to teleportation, google "Kefitzat Haderech", which I
    believe predates Christianity. There's also Wagner's Tarnhelm. If
    you need something explicitly science-fictional try "The Man Without a
    Body" from 1877. Or Clarke's first published story, "Travel by Wire!"
    from 1937. Or for something well known that predates Perry Rhodan,
    try Heinlein's 1955 "Tunnel in the Sky". It also appeared in several
    movies starting in 1939, including the 1953 Merrie Melodies
    "Duck Dodgers"

    which was a direct reference to the telepods in the original "Buck
    Rogers": <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kD7F0aHCALE&t=12m43s>.

    , and 1958's "The Fly".

    --
    Jerry Brown

    A cat may look at a king
    (but probably won't bother)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lafe@21:1/5 to smw on Mon Oct 18 01:02:33 2021
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.written

    smw <smw@mort.smwonline.ca> wrote in news:skfcqv$ovq$1@dont-email.me:

    In <slrnsmm63l.10nr.naddy@lorvorc.mips.inka.de>
    Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> writes:

    There was a bit of a kerfuffle a number of years back when somebody
    noticed that the length of the river Rhine as given in encyclopedias,
    text books, etc. was simply wrong, and this was traced back to a >>transposition of two digits (1230 > 1320 km) that steadily spread
    through all those carefully fact-checked reputable sources *cough*.

    This is related to the phenomenon of citogenesis, as explained by xkcd:

    https://xkcd.com/978/

    xkcd has something relevant to say about almost anything. :-)

    - Steven

    I enjoyed this comic, and then I jumped to today's (https://xkcd.com/2529/)
    and between the two had a nice belly laugh like I haven't had in a while.

    Cheers!

    Lafe

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)