• _No Such Thing_; _Valley of the Gods_

    From septimus_millenicom@q.com@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jun 22 19:40:05 2021
    Two films which seem to extensively reference cinema and
    literature.

    I own DVDs of all of Hal Hartley's films (sometimes 2-3
    versions) but could never get myself to buy _No Such Thing_.
    Rewatching it now, I realize the story is really well
    constructed, even if the execution is poor. The film starts
    with the Monster (Robert John Burke) lamenting on his fading
    power and violence, yet remaining indestructable. Then it
    turns to Sarah Polley's innocent reporter Beatrice, looking
    for her boyfriend in Iceland (killed by the Monster) and
    suffers a plane crash. Burke's blood-thirsty, anguished
    Monster and Nordic setting obviously references the Mary
    Shelley novella, but in a way it is Julie Christie's Dr.
    Anna, who operates on and saves Beatrice, who is the true
    Frankenstein. Polley's sweet anti-Monster is treated
    like Princess Diana, a modern day miracle, by the desperate
    citizens of a world gone mad. (The film was made just after
    9/11, and terrorism, sarin gas, riots, and worse are rampant.)
    She entices the Monster to go to New York and find the crackpot
    doctor who can put him out of his misery. (Is Polley meant
    to be Hwi Noree to Burke's God Emperor of Dune, almost
    genetically programmed to seduce him?) They are betrayed
    by Beatrice's headline-hungry editor who sells him to
    the U.S. military. (An ode to _King Kong_ here, with
    Polley in a Jessica Lange-style S&M dress too.) They
    escape with the crackpot doctor, go back to Iceland, and
    with Dr. Anna's help, euthanizes the Monster in a scene
    reminscent of Beatrice's life-saving surgery. Life, death,
    innocence, corruption, and science that does good rather
    than evil -- very thought-provoking stuff.

    If only the dialog were as sharp as in _Amateur_ or _Henry
    Fool_. Instead characters (especially Burke) feel stranded
    as they go on their histrionic, uninspired monologues. The
    stonefaced Icelandic characters should fit Hartley's deadpan
    style to a T, but they never have enough to do to convince.
    And at the center, Sarah Polley is a bland, miserably inadequate
    presence. The film might have worked if a young Julie Christie
    or Lena Stolze were available, but the overrated Polley
    absolutely dooms the project. (In interviews she said she was
    inspired by _The Thin Red Line_ to become a director, so
    maybe I should cut her some slack ...)

    ---------------------------------------------------------
    _Valley of the Gods_ needs to have a 5-star rating. Not
    because it is remotely lucid in its story-telling, but it
    is one-of-a-kind and its ambition needs to be acknowledged.
    One hopes the investors didn't go bankrupt of course.
    (It seems to be state-funded; surely Poland has better
    needs for money, but who am I to judge!)

    _Valley_ evokes Kubrick (the David Bowman actor from _2001_
    has a small role) but also Lynch and Malick (the theater-of-
    the-mind dungeons recall _Knight of Cups); the science fiction film-within-a-film (accompanied by the aria from "Norma")
    self-consciously evokes _2046_. The immaculate garden screams
    _Last Year at Marienbad_. The editing is nowhere as meticulous
    as in _2046_ and _Marienbad_ though, and the way the director
    treats his minor characters as marionettes rather than real
    human beings ultimately marks him a toy-maker in the vein of
    Kubrick: technically gifted and innovative, but limited.

    Still, the Utah vistas and production designs are worth
    a look (or two). Is the Rolls Royce catapult scene
    "inspired" by Elon Musk shooting his Tesla into outer space?
    Speaking of overweening egos: Bérénice Marlohe is in the
    film and her character also strangely ties this film to
    _Skyfall_, about another male ego trip, a fantastical villain,
    exotic locations, and expandable female characters. _Valley_
    does look like it has a James Bond-sized budget, but at least
    its director seems to know it is an auto-critique of his
    own center-of-the-universe worldview. For all its wide-angle
    shots, it does seem smaller in scope than the director's
    expansive _The Mill and the Cross_.

    (for A., who suffered through _The Mill and the Cross_ with me)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)