• Anne-Sophie Mutter in Montreal

    From septimus3 NA@21:1/5 to All on Sun Mar 24 16:41:47 2019
    If this is the last ever entry I will have time to make on this
    message board scheduled for termination in April, "Anne-Sophie
    Mutter in Montreal" is certainly the way to go out. I have wanted
    to attend a concert in the heart of Montreal's "spectacular
    quarter" for years. Luck was on my side; I picked the only March
    days above freezing to visit. That brought its own perils: the
    entire city was awash in melting snow and mud, and even the
    St. Lawrence River gave signs of thawing. But at least it was
    not hurricane season like New York in 2018, where I barely got
    to the concert.

    Anne-Sophie Mutter's strapless ball gown was in elegant black,
    but rainbow-hued flowers on the hemline dovetailed with her
    blood-red lipstick. Her recital is also elegant and bold. She
    started with Mozart's surpassingly lovely KV 304 sonata. The
    piece -- especially the 2nd movement, its last -- is one of
    my favorite sonatas ever recorded by the German violinist. I
    found her live performance overly harsh and strident, perhaps
    the consequence of reaching for new interpretations in this last
    stop of her North American tour.

    I heard Mutter and accompanish Lambert Orkis play the Debussy
    sonata in their New York recital during Mutter's residence with
    the NYP a few years ago. This was what I wrote:

    "I have underestimated the Debussy sonata for violin and piano
    in F minor because of its modest length. Mutter recorded it a
    decade ago, but having heard it live I have a much better
    appreciation of its quiet but passionate virtuosicity. Sitting
    in the middle of the fourth row, not 10 feet from the stage, I
    could see Mutter's silent gasp of relief as she finished."

    Mutter played it effortlessly this time, with textbook precision,
    just like in her album, and did not need to take a deep breathe
    afterward. As usual she brought to the stage a towel which she
    would drapd over her shoulder when playing difficult pieces; such
    was her confidence that night, she did not use it once.

    The Ravel sonata was for me the centerpiece of the concert. It
    is heavily influenced by jazz music, so improvisation is only
    to be expected. Mutter's interpretation was nothing less than
    revolutionary; it was so different from the way Janine Jansen
    played, and from the _Un Coeur en Hiver_ soundtrack, I barely
    recognized the first movement at first. She was stunning; I wish
    she would record it soon. The "perpetual motion" last movement
    is incredibly difficult and she made it look easy. Incidentally,
    I semi-jokingly disparaged her plucking last year. The second
    movement is dominated by pizzicato, and Mutter's plucking was
    absolutely flawless. Lambert Orkis gave an energetic piano
    accompaniment that did not call too much attention to itself,
    unlike the case with the Janine Jansen concert not long ago.

    After the intermission, Mutter rolled out Mozart's KV 454. It
    was probably my least favorite sonata among those she recorded,
    but in a live performance it was marvelously alive. It let
    her open her arms and let it rip, unlike the more sedate KV 304.
    Still, the piece is dominated by the piano. The slow movement
    is very beautiful, and the overall structure is sufficiently
    simple that even I could understand it.

    The same cannot be said of the Poulenc sonata, which I listened
    to 20 times before the concert and still found it perplexing.
    In Mutter's hand, however, it was very convincing. The liner
    notes claim that Poulenc admired Brahms, and indeed in her
    interpretation there is a lot of Brahms in the piece. I've
    always thought that Mutter, with her robust, powerful bowing
    that seeks to draw blood with every note, was born to play
    Brahms. The Poulenc flatters her technique (and does not suit
    Midori, whose recording I studied).

    The Poulenc sonata alternates between lyrical passages and
    impish, jokey segments. Especially at the end, it tends to
    confuse audiences, making them applaud prematurely. The
    Montreal audience is exceptionally knowledgeable and well
    behaved. No one applaud at the wrong place even once. This
    is especially remarkable because no more than half of them
    have white hair! (Montreal has the youthful energy of
    Manhattan; I consider it the Second City of the continent.)
    On the flip side, there is a distinct lack of spontaneous
    passion. The Ravel sonata before the intermission definitely
    merited a standing ovation, but the audience didn't even
    try.

    For encore, Mutter picked an Australian fiddling piece arranged
    by Heifetz. Then, as I anticipated, she paid tribute to Andre
    Previn (her ex-husband and frequent collaborator) and played the
    slow movement of his "Tango Song and Dance." It was by far my
    favorite piece written by Previn. (Unlike the time she debutted
    it in New york, she did not use a mute in the second half. The
    mute seems to have gone out of fashion; a recent performance of
    the Beethoven Emperor Concerto I attended skipped it too.) It
    was an incredibly emotional moment, and the perfect ending to
    my 16th Mutter concert.

    (for A.)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)