XPost: la.general, alt.politics.media, alt.business
XPost: dc.politics

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/01/09/17/8321528-6573905-image- a-6_1547055571738.jpg

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/01/09/17/8321230-6573905-image- m-12_1547055672514.jpg

The New York Times has been trying to dismiss the arrest of Ed
Buck, a Democratic fatcat who had a thing for injecting young
black men with drugs before paying them for sex, as a "small-
time Democratic donor," but the facts on the ground suggest he
was a rather big one. And maybe that's a function of the paper's
desire to protect its masters, the Democrats. They aren't known
as Democratic operatives with bylines for nothing.

Fox Business has a rundown:

While Buck once identified himself as a conservative Republican,
according to the Los Angeles Times, he became a national figure
when he spearheaded the effort to impeach Arizona’s Republican
Gov. Evan Mecham in the 1980s. He later made large donations to
Democrats, including more than $500,000 since 2007, according to
court documents filed by Moore's mother in a wrongful death suit
pertaining to her son.

At the federal level, those include contributions to prominent
Washington lawmakers as well as 2016 Democratic presidential
candidate Hillary Clinton. At the local level, Buck has donated
more than $51,000 to Los Angeles city and county officials,
candidates, and affiliated parties dating to 2008.

In 2012, Buck contributed $100 to the campaign for Jackie Lacey
for Los Angeles County District Attorney, and four years later,
gave $1,400 to Eric Garcetti for Mayor of Los Angeles. Both
Lacey and Garcetti still hold their titles.

The highest contribution was $13,000, according to the court
papers, to former West Hollywood Mayor John Duran when he ran
for county supervisor in 2014.

That doesn't sound too small-time to me.

And in fact, his ideological switcheroo sounds as though he
found the Democrats a more suitable protection racket for his
perversions than the Republicans. Who needs political beliefs
when the real belief is perversion and that's what he needs
protected?

It's actually part of the pattern with these scandals. Pervert
with big vices donates cash to Democrats to ensure his
protection from the cops. Harvey Weinstein knew it, that was
what his Planned Parenthood and other woke cause donations
bought for him - a capacity to prey on young actresses trying to
win roles. Jeffrey Epstein knew it too, donating to leftist Bill
Clinton causes in order to buy enough influence to enable him to
prey on underage girls with impunity, spiriting them to his
pervert island for himself along with his highly connected
Democrat buddies. Both had added payoffs in that Weinstein then
had the power to threaten actresses and reporters who threatened
to tell on him, while Epstein had blackmail material on very
powerful people which kept them on his string.

Now we have the sorry case of Ed Buck, a creep who enjoyed
paying for sex with young black men while poisoning them with
drugs, and then relying on his political donations to ensure the
cops looked the other way. Note that quite a few of his
donations were to Los Angeles local officials, all of them
Democrats. Assuming this tweet's images are not manipulated,
look at the range of Buck's Democrats:

A THIRD death in this guy's house. WTF!? Ed Buck donated money
to Chuck Schumer, Ted Lieu, & Hillary Clinton... was given a
free pass / no repercussions after the first two black guys died
(18 months apart) from drug fueled speed & poppers homosexual
parties.. @CBSNews pic.twitter.com/OiAowcB5W5

— The Wanted Emcees (@TheWantedEmcees) September 18, 2019

Combine it with media malfeasance - the mainstream media tried
to turn down Ronan Farrow's report on Weinstein, it tried to pin
the Epstein scandal on President Trump, and now it's trying to
persuade us that Buck was just small fry, and the protection
racket seems complete.

With so many of these perverts turning up in the Democrat donor
base as well as organizations such as Planned Parenthood, one
wonders if these are the only ones out there. Is the Democratic
Party held together in no small part by freaks using politics as
their 'vaccination' from scrutiny? Are their perversions and the
need to protect them at the root of why these groups are so
powerful and Democrats are so extreme and inflexible on issues
such as abortion? Might that be why they're so out of step with
even the Democratic voting public? And why are the Democrats the
more hospitable party for such a sorry scenario? Why are they
the party of perverts? It actually isn't just these three, it's
quite a few of them as I noted here. A lot of such characters
have turned up in a very, very short time and the pattern is
exactly the same for each. How many more are there? What does
Ted Lieu, Adam Schiff, Hillary Clinton and other Democrats
who've benefited from Buck's bucks have to say about this? And
why aren't all of the Democrats confronting this?

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2019/09/democrats_as_a_prot ection_racket_ed_buck_makes_it_a_trifecta.html

TAGS: Barack Obama Homosexual Degenerate Gay Pedophile Democrat
Liberalism Pervert CNN CBS ABC NBC Disney MSNBC Faggots Hillary
Clinton Racist Queer Progressive Antifa Faggots Nancy Pelosi
 

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)