For once I'm on Alec's side. This girl deserved a Baldwin Shot to the jaw.
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
For once I'm on Alec's side. This girl deserved a Baldwin Shot to the jaw. >>https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1782537868654592000/pu/vid/avc1/320x568/fUPEunTyWUNbP57L.mp4?tag=12
https://apple.news/A9M48T4LsTYOCvCmG3eY14Q
“The agitator, who hosts a show on social media called Crackhead Barney & Friends and is known for ambush interviews”
https://www.bowiecreators.com/project/crackhead-barney-and-friends-nyc-interview-fds-festival-performance-lausanne
“shooting and killing cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on the "Rust" movie set in 2021 using a gun he did not know was loaded.”
Nice to know they’ve made that determination.
“This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.”
On 4/23/2024 1:04 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
For once I'm on Alec's side. This girl deserved a Baldwin Shot to the jaw. >>>https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1782537868654592000/pu/vid/avc1/320x568/fUPEunTyWUNbP57L.mp4?tag=12
https://apple.news/A9M48T4LsTYOCvCmG3eY14Q
“The agitator, who hosts a show on social media called Crackhead Barney & >> Friends and is known for ambush interviews”
https://www.bowiecreators.com/project/crackhead-barney-and-friends-nyc-interview-fds-festival-performance-lausanne
“shooting and killing cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on the "Rust" movie >> set in 2021 using a gun he did not know was loaded.”
Nice to know they’ve made that determination.
“This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or
redistributed.”
There's dissonance in a law that forbids him from striking her but says nothing about her emphatically asking for it.
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
For once I'm on Alec's side. This girl deserved a Baldwin Shot to the jaw. >>https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1782537868654592000/pu/vid/avc1/320x568/fUPEunTyWUNbP57L.mp4?tag=12
https://apple.news/A9M48T4LsTYOCvCmG3eY14Q
“The agitator, who hosts a show on social media called Crackhead Barney & Friends and is known for ambush interviews”
moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 4/23/2024 1:04 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
For once I'm on Alec's side. This girl deserved a Baldwin Shot to the jaw. >>>>https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1782537868654592000/pu/vid/avc1/320x568/fUPEunTyWUNbP57L.mp4?tag=12
https://apple.news/A9M48T4LsTYOCvCmG3eY14Q
“The agitator, who hosts a show on social media called Crackhead Barney & >>> Friends and is known for ambush interviews”
https://www.bowiecreators.com/project/crackhead-barney-and-friends-nyc-interview-fds-festival-performance-lausanne
“shooting and killing cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on the "Rust" movie >>> set in 2021 using a gun he did not know was loaded.”
Nice to know they’ve made that determination.
“This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or
redistributed.”
There's dissonance in a law that forbids him from striking her but says
nothing about her emphatically asking for it.
The article says he hit her phone, not her.
But then the article also says he didn’t know the gun was loaded.
moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 4/23/2024 1:04 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:The article says he hit her phone, not her.
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
For once I'm on Alec's side. This girl deserved a Baldwin Shot to the jaw.
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1782537868654592000/pu/vid/avc1/320x568/fUPEunTyWUNbP57L.mp4?tag=12
https://apple.news/A9M48T4LsTYOCvCmG3eY14Q
"The agitator, who hosts a show on social media called Crackhead Barney & >>> Friends and is known for ambush interviews"
https://www.bowiecreators.com/project/crackhead-barney-and-friends-nyc-interview-fds-festival-performance-lausanne
"shooting and killing cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on the RUST movie >>> set in 2021 using a gun he did not know was loaded."
Nice to know they've made that determination.
"This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or
redistributed."
There's dissonance in a law that forbids him from striking her but says
nothing about her emphatically asking for it.
But then the article also says he didn’t know the gun was loaded.
On 2024-04-23 17:04:10 +0000, anim8rfsk said:
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
For once I'm on Alec's side. This girl deserved a Baldwin Shot to the jaw. >>>
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1782537868654592000/pu/vid/avc1/320x568/fUPEunTyWUNbP57L.mp4?tag=12
https://apple.news/A9M48T4LsTYOCvCmG3eY14Q
"The agitator, who hosts a show on social media called Crackhead Barney & >> Friends and is known for ambush interviews"
They showed it on TMZ Live, from "why did you shoot that girl" to "say
Free Palestine...say it just once"?
She's gonna ambush the wrong person one of these days, probably from
her own hood.
Apr 23, 2024 at 3:35:52 PM PDT, super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid>:
On 2024-04-23 17:04:10 +0000, anim8rfsk said:
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
For once I'm on Alec's side. This girl deserved a Baldwin Shot to the jaw.
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1782537868654592000/pu/vid/avc1/320x568/fUPEunTyWUNbP57L.mp4?tag=12
https://apple.news/A9M48T4LsTYOCvCmG3eY14Q
"The agitator, who hosts a show on social media called Crackhead Barney & >>>Friends and is known for ambush interviews"
They showed it on TMZ Live, from "why did you shoot that girl" to "say
Free Palestine...say it just once"?
She's gonna ambush the wrong person one of these days, probably from
her own hood.
What is it with this thing protesters do these days where they demand their >target repeat a phrase? They did this to Occasional-Cortex and now Alec >Baldwin-- in both cases they wanted them to recite "Free Palestine".
Even if Baldwin doesn't believe it, she wants him to just say it. If
you're a normal person and you watch that, you think, what value is
there in making him say it?
Let's say you succeed and he says the phrase. He's only saying it because
you have hectored and harassed him into saying it and he figures you'll
go away if he does. He's only saying it because you won't shut up, not >because he believes it. You haven't changed his mind or anything. He's
just repeating a phrase that you have assigned to him. What do you get
out of that? What does that accomplish? What's the point?
They did this during the BLM Summer of Love riots, too. They'd burst into >restaurants and surround white people eating dinner and demand that they say >"black lives matter".
Leftists seem to take this approach on every issue, in every situation. It >seems intellectually adjacent to the pronoun stuff with the troons. You *must* >say the words they want regardless of whether you believe them or not.
Not only don't they care if you actually believe the words, they almost >*prefer* that you not believe them. Because that shows their power over you. >If you believed the words, then they haven't really exercised any power over >you, but if they can make you say shit you don't believe in because they've >scared or intimidated you into doing so, then they have bright line evidence >of the power they wield.
On Apr 23, 2024 at 3:35:52 PM PDT, "super70s" <super70s@super70s.invalid> >wrote:
On 2024-04-23 17:04:10 +0000, anim8rfsk said:
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
For once I'm on Alec's side. This girl deserved a Baldwin Shot to the jaw.
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1782537868654592000/pu/vid/avc1/320x568/fUPEunTyWUNbP57L.mp4?tag=12
https://apple.news/A9M48T4LsTYOCvCmG3eY14Q
"The agitator, who hosts a show on social media called Crackhead Barney & >>> Friends and is known for ambush interviews"
They showed it on TMZ Live, from "why did you shoot that girl" to "say
Free Palestine...say it just once"?
She's gonna ambush the wrong person one of these days, probably from
her own hood.
What is it with this thing protesters do these days where they demand their >target repeat a phrase? They did this to Occasional-Cortex and now Alec >Baldwin-- in both cases they wanted them to recite "Free Palestine".
Even if Baldwin doesn't believe it, she wants him to just say it. If you're a >normal person and you watch that, you think, what value is there in making him >say it?
Let's say you succeed and he says the phrase. He's only saying it because you >have hectored and harassed him into saying it and he figures you'll go away if >he does. He's only saying it because you won't shut up, not because he >believes it. You haven't changed his mind or anything. He's just repeating a >phrase that you have assigned to him. What do you get out of that? What does >that accomplish? What's the point?
They did this during the BLM Summer of Love riots, too. They'd burst into >restaurants and surround white people eating dinner and demand that they say >"black lives matter".
Leftists seem to take this approach on every issue, in every situation. It >seems intellectually adjacent to the pronoun stuff with the troons. You *must* >say the words they want regardless of whether you believe them or not.
Not only don't they care if you actually believe the words, they almost >*prefer* that you not believe them. Because that shows their power over you. >If you believed the words, then they haven't really exercised any power over >you, but if they can make you say shit you don't believe in because they've >scared or intimidated you into doing so, then they have bright line evidence >of the power they wield.
On Apr 23, 2024 at 2:49:02 PM PDT, "anim8rfsk" <anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:
moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 4/23/2024 1:04 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:The article says he hit her phone, not her.
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
For once I'm on Alec's side. This girl deserved a Baldwin Shot to the jaw.
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1782537868654592000/pu/vid/avc1/320x568/fUPEunTyWUNbP57L.mp4?tag=12
https://apple.news/A9M48T4LsTYOCvCmG3eY14Q
"The agitator, who hosts a show on social media called Crackhead Barney &
Friends and is known for ambush interviews"
https://www.bowiecreators.com/project/crackhead-barney-and-friends-nyc-interview-fds-festival-performance-lausanne
"shooting and killing cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on the RUST movie >>>> set in 2021 using a gun he did not know was loaded."
Nice to know they've made that determination.
"This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or
redistributed."
There's dissonance in a law that forbids him from striking her but says >>> nothing about her emphatically asking for it.
But then the article also says he didn’t know the gun was loaded.
Do you realize how much of an obnoxious, stupid, blithering, idiot scumbag you
have to be to make Alec Baldwin seem sympathetic; to create a video that makes
me feel sorry for Alec Baldwin? 'Cause usually when I watch an Alec Baldwin video, the emotions I'm accustomed to feeling are irritation, revulsion, scorn. I didn't think it was possible for someone to do or say anything that would make me side with Alec Baldwin, but here we are.
In any interaction with Alec Baldwin, you automatically get the benefit of the
doubt because you are not Alec Baldwin and he is. In order to squander that advantage, you have to go out of your way to be as unpleasant as humanly possible. And she managed to do it in less than a minute. I mean, really, quite an achievement.
On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 17:12:03 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
On Apr 23, 2024 at 3:35:52 PM PDT, "super70s" <super70s@super70s.invalid>
wrote:
On 2024-04-23 17:04:10 +0000, anim8rfsk said:
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
For once I'm on Alec's side. This girl deserved a Baldwin Shot to the jaw.
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1782537868654592000/pu/vid/avc1/320x568/fUPEunTyWUNbP57L.mp4?tag=12
https://apple.news/A9M48T4LsTYOCvCmG3eY14Q
"The agitator, who hosts a show on social media called Crackhead Barney &
Friends and is known for ambush interviews"
They showed it on TMZ Live, from "why did you shoot that girl" to "say
Free Palestine...say it just once"?
She's gonna ambush the wrong person one of these days, probably from
her own hood.
What is it with this thing protesters do these days where they demand their >> target repeat a phrase? They did this to Occasional-Cortex and now Alec
Baldwin-- in both cases they wanted them to recite "Free Palestine".
Even if Baldwin doesn't believe it, she wants him to just say it. If you're a
normal person and you watch that, you think, what value is there in making him
say it?
I'm not sure what she intended. I'm sure someone would clip out his
just saying the phrase and use that to show more support for Palestine
but I'm not sure if that was her point. More likely it's just the hot
phrase that can generate clicks so she's using it. After all she can
use it as a title to draw in the clicks "Alec Baldwin says Free
Palestine!"
Let's say you succeed and he says the phrase. He's only saying it because you
have hectored and harassed him into saying it and he figures you'll go away if
he does. He's only saying it because you won't shut up, not because he
believes it. You haven't changed his mind or anything. He's just repeating a >> phrase that you have assigned to him. What do you get out of that? What does >> that accomplish? What's the point?
The clicks are all that matters.
They did this during the BLM Summer of Love riots, too. They'd burst into
restaurants and surround white people eating dinner and demand that they say >> "black lives matter".
My response as a nobody who doesn't have a social media following
would be to say "Black lives don't matter" just to watch them lose
their minds. Demanding any sort of comment from me isn't going to get
the desired response unless I'm in fear of damage to my person.
Leftists seem to take this approach on every issue, in every situation. It >> seems intellectually adjacent to the pronoun stuff with the troons. You *must*
say the words they want regardless of whether you believe them or not.
Not only don't they care if you actually believe the words, they almost
*prefer* that you not believe them. Because that shows their power over you. >> If you believed the words, then they haven't really exercised any power over >> you, but if they can make you say shit you don't believe in because they've >> scared or intimidated you into doing so, then they have bright line evidence >> of the power they wield.
Power that amounts to nothing in the real world. Maybe it makes them
feel good but it is only going to make people turn against them and
their ideas. It's like winning the battle at the cost of losing the
war.
For once I'm on Alec's side. This girl deserved a Baldwin Shot to the jaw.
What is it with this thing protesters do these days where they demand their >target repeat a phrase? They did this to Occasional-Cortex and now Alec >Baldwin-- in both cases they wanted them to recite "Free Palestine".
anim8rfsk@cox.net wrote:
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
For once I'm on Alec's side. This girl deserved a Baldwin Shot to the jaw. >>"The agitator, who hosts a show on social media called Crackhead Barney &
Friends and is known for ambush interviews"
https://www.bowiecreators.com/project/crackhead-barney-and-friends-nyc-interview-fds-festival-performance-lausanne
For all her bravado, I would love to see that dumb cunt visit Gaza.
On 4/25/2024 2:01 PM, shawn wrote:
On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 17:12:03 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
On Apr 23, 2024 at 3:35:52 PM PDT, "super70s" <super70s@super70s.invalid> >>> wrote:
On 2024-04-23 17:04:10 +0000, anim8rfsk said:
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
For once I'm on Alec's side. This girl deserved a Baldwin Shot to the jaw.
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1782537868654592000/pu/vid/avc1/320x568/fUPEunTyWUNbP57L.mp4?tag=12
https://apple.news/A9M48T4LsTYOCvCmG3eY14Q
"The agitator, who hosts a show on social media called Crackhead Barney & >>>>> Friends and is known for ambush interviews"
They showed it on TMZ Live, from "why did you shoot that girl" to "say >>>> Free Palestine...say it just once"?
She's gonna ambush the wrong person one of these days, probably from
her own hood.
What is it with this thing protesters do these days where they demand their >>> target repeat a phrase? They did this to Occasional-Cortex and now Alec
Baldwin-- in both cases they wanted them to recite "Free Palestine".
Even if Baldwin doesn't believe it, she wants him to just say it. If you're a
normal person and you watch that, you think, what value is there in making him
say it?
I'm not sure what she intended. I'm sure someone would clip out his
just saying the phrase and use that to show more support for Palestine
but I'm not sure if that was her point. More likely it's just the hot
phrase that can generate clicks so she's using it. After all she can
use it as a title to draw in the clicks "Alec Baldwin says Free
Palestine!"
Let's say you succeed and he says the phrase. He's only saying it because you
have hectored and harassed him into saying it and he figures you'll go away if
he does. He's only saying it because you won't shut up, not because he
believes it. You haven't changed his mind or anything. He's just repeating a
phrase that you have assigned to him. What do you get out of that? What does
that accomplish? What's the point?
The clicks are all that matters.
They did this during the BLM Summer of Love riots, too. They'd burst into >>> restaurants and surround white people eating dinner and demand that they say
"black lives matter".
My response as a nobody who doesn't have a social media following
would be to say "Black lives don't matter" just to watch them lose
their minds. Demanding any sort of comment from me isn't going to get
the desired response unless I'm in fear of damage to my person.
Leftists seem to take this approach on every issue, in every situation. It >>> seems intellectually adjacent to the pronoun stuff with the troons. You *must*
say the words they want regardless of whether you believe them or not.
Not only don't they care if you actually believe the words, they almost
*prefer* that you not believe them. Because that shows their power over you.
If you believed the words, then they haven't really exercised any power over
you, but if they can make you say shit you don't believe in because they've >>> scared or intimidated you into doing so, then they have bright line evidence
of the power they wield.
Power that amounts to nothing in the real world. Maybe it makes them
feel good but it is only going to make people turn against them and
their ideas. It's like winning the battle at the cost of losing the
war.
I doubt there's evidence this is the province of "leftists".
Regardless, I think the idea is that you'll be filmed either "cowering
and caving to the truth" or "unable even to utter the words".
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
For once I'm on Alec's side. This girl deserved a Baldwin Shot to the jaw.
"The agitator, who hosts a show on social media called Crackhead Barney & >Friends and is known for ambush interviews"
https://www.bowiecreators.com/project/crackhead-barney-and-friends-nyc-interview-fds-festival-performance-lausanne
They did this during the BLM Summer of Love riots, too. They'd burst into >restaurants and surround white people eating dinner and demand that they say >"black lives matter".
On Apr 23, 2024 at 2:49:02 PM PDT, "anim8rfsk" <anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:
moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 4/23/2024 1:04 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:The article says he hit her phone, not her.
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
For once I'm on Alec's side. This girl deserved a Baldwin Shot to the jaw.
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1782537868654592000/pu/vid/avc1/320x568/fUPEunTyWUNbP57L.mp4?tag=12
https://apple.news/A9M48T4LsTYOCvCmG3eY14Q
"The agitator, who hosts a show on social media called Crackhead Barney &
Friends and is known for ambush interviews"
https://www.bowiecreators.com/project/crackhead-barney-and-friends-nyc-interview-fds-festival-performance-lausanne
"shooting and killing cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on the RUST movie >>>> set in 2021 using a gun he did not know was loaded."
Nice to know they've made that determination.
"This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or
redistributed."
There's dissonance in a law that forbids him from striking her but says >>> nothing about her emphatically asking for it.
But then the article also says he didn’t know the gun was loaded.
Do you realize how much of an obnoxious, stupid, blithering, idiot scumbag you
have to be to make Alec Baldwin seem sympathetic;
me feel sorry for Alec Baldwin? 'Cause usually when I watch an Alec Baldwin video, the emotions I'm accustomed to feeling are irritation, revulsion, scorn. I didn't think it was possible for someone to do or say anything that would make me side with Alec Baldwin, but here we are.
In any interaction with Alec Baldwin, you automatically get the benefit of the
doubt because you are not Alec Baldwin and he is. In order to squander that advantage, you have to go out of your way to be as unpleasant as humanly possible. And she managed to do it in less than a minute. I mean, really, quite an achievement.
On Apr 23, 2024 at 3:35:52 PM PDT, "super70s" <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2024-04-23 17:04:10 +0000, anim8rfsk said:
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
For once I'm on Alec's side. This girl deserved a Baldwin Shot to the jaw.
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1782537868654592000/pu/vid/avc1/320x568/fUPEunTyWUNbP57L.mp4?tag=12
https://apple.news/A9M48T4LsTYOCvCmG3eY14Q
"The agitator, who hosts a show on social media called Crackhead Barney & >>> Friends and is known for ambush interviews"
They showed it on TMZ Live, from "why did you shoot that girl" to "say
Free Palestine...say it just once"?
She's gonna ambush the wrong person one of these days, probably from
her own hood.
What is it with this thing protesters do these days where they demand their target repeat a phrase? They did this to Occasional-Cortex and now Alec Baldwin-- in both cases they wanted them to recite "Free Palestine".
Even if Baldwin doesn't believe it, she wants him to just say it. If you're a normal person and you watch that, you think, what value is there in making him
say it?
Let's say you succeed and he says the phrase. He's only saying it because you have hectored and harassed him into saying it and he figures you'll go away if
he does. He's only saying it because you won't shut up, not because he believes it. You haven't changed his mind or anything. He's just repeating a phrase that you have assigned to him. What do you get out of that? What does that accomplish? What's the point?
They did this during the BLM Summer of Love riots, too. They'd burst into restaurants and surround white people eating dinner and demand that they say "black lives matter".
Leftists seem to take this approach on every issue, in every situation. It seems intellectually adjacent to the pronoun stuff with the troons. You *must*
say the words they want regardless of whether you believe them or not.
Not only don't they care if you actually believe the words, they almost *prefer* that you not believe them. Because that shows their power over you. If you believed the words, then they haven't really exercised any power over you, but if they can make you say shit you don't believe in because they've scared or intimidated you into doing so, then they have bright line evidence of the power they wield.
On Apr 25, 2024 at 12:23:27 PM PDT, "Ubiquitous" <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
anim8rfsk@cox.net wrote:
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
For once I'm on Alec's side. This girl deserved a Baldwin Shot to the jaw.
"The agitator, who hosts a show on social media called Crackhead Barney & >>> Friends and is known for ambush interviews"
https://www.bowiecreators.com/project/crackhead-barney-and-friends-nyc-interview-fds-festival-performance-lausanne
For all her bravado, I would love to see that dumb cunt visit Gaza.
https://ibb.co/BrdfNnB
"Ubiquitous" <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
anim8rfsk@cox.net wrote:
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
For once I'm on Alec's side. This girl deserved a Baldwin Shot to the >>>> jaw.
"The agitator, who hosts a show on social media called Crackhead Barney
& Friends and is known for ambush interviews"
https://www.bowiecreators.com/project/crackhead-barney-and-friends-nyc-interview-fds-festival-performance-lausanne
For all her bravado, I would love to see that dumb cunt visit Gaza.
https://ibb.co/BrdfNnB
On 2024-04-25 19:06:46 +0000, moviePig said:
On 4/25/2024 2:01 PM, shawn wrote:
On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 17:12:03 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
On Apr 23, 2024 at 3:35:52 PM PDT, "super70s"
<super70s@super70s.invalid>
wrote:
On 2024-04-23 17:04:10 +0000, anim8rfsk said:
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
For once I'm on Alec's side. This girl deserved a Baldwin Shot to >>>>>>> the jaw.
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1782537868654592000/pu/vid/avc1/320x568/fUPEunTyWUNbP57L.mp4?tag=12
https://apple.news/A9M48T4LsTYOCvCmG3eY14Q
"The agitator, who hosts a show on social media called Crackhead
Barney &
Friends and is known for ambush interviews"
They showed it on TMZ Live, from "why did you shoot that girl" to "say >>>>> Free Palestine...say it just once"?
She's gonna ambush the wrong person one of these days, probably from >>>>> her own hood.
What is it with this thing protesters do these days where they
demand their
target repeat a phrase? They did this to Occasional-Cortex and now Alec >>>> Baldwin-- in both cases they wanted them to recite "Free Palestine".
Even if Baldwin doesn't believe it, she wants him to just say it. If
you're a
normal person and you watch that, you think, what value is there in
making him
say it?
I'm not sure what she intended. I'm sure someone would clip out his
just saying the phrase and use that to show more support for Palestine
but I'm not sure if that was her point. More likely it's just the hot
phrase that can generate clicks so she's using it. After all she can
use it as a title to draw in the clicks "Alec Baldwin says Free
Palestine!"
Let's say you succeed and he says the phrase. He's only saying it
because you
have hectored and harassed him into saying it and he figures you'll
go away if
he does. He's only saying it because you won't shut up, not because he >>>> believes it. You haven't changed his mind or anything. He's just
repeating a
phrase that you have assigned to him. What do you get out of that?
What does
that accomplish? What's the point?
The clicks are all that matters.
They did this during the BLM Summer of Love riots, too. They'd burst
into
restaurants and surround white people eating dinner and demand that
they say
"black lives matter".
My response as a nobody who doesn't have a social media following
would be to say "Black lives don't matter" just to watch them lose
their minds. Demanding any sort of comment from me isn't going to get
the desired response unless I'm in fear of damage to my person.
Leftists seem to take this approach on every issue, in every
situation. It
seems intellectually adjacent to the pronoun stuff with the troons.
You *must*
say the words they want regardless of whether you believe them or not. >>>>
Not only don't they care if you actually believe the words, they almost >>>> *prefer* that you not believe them. Because that shows their power
over you.
If you believed the words, then they haven't really exercised any
power over
you, but if they can make you say shit you don't believe in because
they've
scared or intimidated you into doing so, then they have bright line
evidence
of the power they wield.
Power that amounts to nothing in the real world. Maybe it makes them
feel good but it is only going to make people turn against them and
their ideas. It's like winning the battle at the cost of losing the
war.
I doubt there's evidence this is the province of "leftists".
I understand Jesse Watters started his (in)auspicious career doing
"ambushes" for Bill O'Reilly.
Regardless, I think the idea is that you'll be filmed either "cowering
and caving to the truth" or "unable even to utter the words".
On 4/25/2024 12:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Apr 23, 2024 at 2:49:02 PM PDT, "anim8rfsk" <anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:
moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 4/23/2024 1:04 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:The article says he hit her phone, not her.
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:There's dissonance in a law that forbids him from striking her but
For once I'm on Alec's side. This girl deserved a Baldwin Shot
to the jaw.
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1782537868654592000/pu/vid/avc1/320x568/fUPEunTyWUNbP57L.mp4?tag=12
https://apple.news/A9M48T4LsTYOCvCmG3eY14Q
"The agitator, who hosts a show on social media called Crackhead
Barney &
Friends and is known for ambush interviews"
https://www.bowiecreators.com/project/crackhead-barney-and-friends-nyc-interview-fds-festival-performance-lausanne
"shooting and killing cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on the RUST >>>>> movie
set in 2021 using a gun he did not know was loaded."
Nice to know they've made that determination.
"This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or
redistributed."
says
nothing about her emphatically asking for it.
But then the article also says he didn’t know the gun was loaded.
Do you realize how much of an obnoxious, stupid, blithering, idiot
scumbag you
have to be to make Alec Baldwin seem sympathetic; to create a video
that makes
me feel sorry for Alec Baldwin? 'Cause usually when I watch an Alec
Baldwin
video, the emotions I'm accustomed to feeling are irritation, revulsion,
scorn. I didn't think it was possible for someone to do or say
anything that
would make me side with Alec Baldwin, but here we are.
In any interaction with Alec Baldwin, you automatically get the
benefit of the
doubt because you are not Alec Baldwin and he is. In order to squander
that
advantage, you have to go out of your way to be as unpleasant as humanly
possible. And she managed to do it in less than a minute. I mean, really,
quite an achievement.
It was almost reminiscent of BOWLING FOR COLUMBINE's finale, where
Michael Moore hounds gun-advocate Charlton Heston around his own home.
Later we learned that Heston was dealing with Alzheimer's, but even on
its own the scene undercuts any humane aspect to Moore's message.
On 4/25/2024 12:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Apr 23, 2024 at 2:49:02 PM PDT, "anim8rfsk" <anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:
moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 4/23/2024 1:04 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:The article says he hit her phone, not her.
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:There's dissonance in a law that forbids him from striking her but
For once I'm on Alec's side. This girl deserved a Baldwin Shot
to the jaw.
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1782537868654592000/pu/vid/avc1/320x568/fUPEunTyWUNbP57L.mp4?tag=12
https://apple.news/A9M48T4LsTYOCvCmG3eY14Q
"The agitator, who hosts a show on social media called Crackhead
Barney &
Friends and is known for ambush interviews"
https://www.bowiecreators.com/project/crackhead-barney-and-friends-nyc-interview-fds-festival-performance-lausanne
"shooting and killing cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on the RUST >>>>> movie
set in 2021 using a gun he did not know was loaded."
Nice to know they've made that determination.
"This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or
redistributed."
says
nothing about her emphatically asking for it.
But then the article also says he didn’t know the gun was loaded.
Do you realize how much of an obnoxious, stupid, blithering, idiot
scumbag you
have to be to make Alec Baldwin seem sympathetic; to create a video
that makes
me feel sorry for Alec Baldwin? 'Cause usually when I watch an Alec
Baldwin
video, the emotions I'm accustomed to feeling are irritation, revulsion,
scorn. I didn't think it was possible for someone to do or say
anything that
would make me side with Alec Baldwin, but here we are.
In any interaction with Alec Baldwin, you automatically get the
benefit of the
doubt because you are not Alec Baldwin and he is. In order to squander
that
advantage, you have to go out of your way to be as unpleasant as humanly
possible. And she managed to do it in less than a minute. I mean, really,
quite an achievement.
It was almost reminiscent of BOWLING FOR COLUMBINE's finale, where
Michael Moore hounds gun-advocate Charlton Heston around his own home.
Later we learned that Heston was dealing with Alzheimer's, but even on
its own the scene undercuts any humane aspect to Moore's message.
atropos@mac.com wrote:
"Ubiquitous" <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
anim8rfsk@cox.net wrote:
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
For once I'm on Alec's side. This girl deserved a Baldwin Shot to the >>>>> jaw.
"The agitator, who hosts a show on social media called Crackhead Barney >>>> & Friends and is known for ambush interviews"
https://www.bowiecreators.com/project/crackhead-barney-and-friends-nyc-interview-fds-festival-performance-lausanne
For all her bravado, I would love to see that dumb cunt visit Gaza.
https://ibb.co/BrdfNnB
Bwah!
I have a short story somewhere
impose her way on some Moslems overseas, only to get brutally raped.
--
Let's go Brandon!
On 2024-04-25 19:06:46 +0000, moviePig said:
On 4/25/2024 2:01 PM, shawn wrote:
On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 17:12:03 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
"super70s" <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2024-04-23 17:04:10 +0000, anim8rfsk said:
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
For once I'm on Alec's side. This girl deserved a Baldwin Shot to the >>>>>>> jaw.
https://apple.news/A9M48T4LsTYOCvCmG3eY14Q
"The agitator, who hosts a show on social media called Crackhead
Barney & Friends and is known for ambush interviews"
They showed it on TMZ Live, from "why did you shoot that girl" to "say >>>>> Free Palestine...say it just once"?
She's gonna ambush the wrong person one of these days, probably from >>>>> her own hood.
What is it with this thing protesters do these days where they demand
their target repeat a phrase? They did this to Occasional-Cortex and now >>>> Alec Baldwin-- in both cases they wanted them to recite "Free
Palestine".
Even if Baldwin doesn't believe it, she wants him to just say it. If
you're a normal person and you watch that, you think, what value is
there in making him say it?
I'm not sure what she intended. I'm sure someone would clip out his
just saying the phrase and use that to show more support for Palestine
but I'm not sure if that was her point. More likely it's just the hot
phrase that can generate clicks so she's using it. After all she can
use it as a title to draw in the clicks "Alec Baldwin says Free
Palestine!"
Let's say you succeed and he says the phrase. He's only saying it
because you have hectored and harassed him into saying it and he figures >>>> you'll go away if he does. He's only saying it because you won't shut
up, not because he believes it. You haven't changed his mind or
anything. He's just repeating a phrase that you have assigned to him.
What do you get out of that? What does that accomplish? What's the
point?
The clicks are all that matters.
They did this during the BLM Summer of Love riots, too. They'd burst
into restaurants and surround white people eating dinner and demand
that they say "black lives matter".
My response as a nobody who doesn't have a social media following
would be to say "Black lives don't matter" just to watch them lose
their minds. Demanding any sort of comment from me isn't going to get
the desired response unless I'm in fear of damage to my person.
Leftists seem to take this approach on every issue, in every situation. >>>> It seems intellectually adjacent to the pronoun stuff with the troons. >>>> You *must* say the words they want regardless of whether you believe
them or not.
Not only don't they care if you actually believe the words, they almost >>>> *prefer* that you not believe them. Because that shows their power over >>>> you. If you believed the words, then they haven't really exercised any >>>> power over you, but if they can make you say shit you don't believe in >>>> because they've scared or intimidated you into doing so, then they have >>>> bright line evidence of the power they wield.
Power that amounts to nothing in the real world. Maybe it makes them
feel good but it is only going to make people turn against them and
their ideas. It's like winning the battle at the cost of losing the
war.
I doubt there's evidence this is the province of "leftists".
I understand Jesse Watters started his (in)auspicious career doing
"ambushes" for Bill O'Reilly.
On 4/25/24 1:53 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 4/25/2024 12:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Apr 23, 2024 at 2:49:02 PM PDT, "anim8rfsk" <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
wrote:
moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 4/23/2024 1:04 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:The article says he hit her phone, not her.
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:There's dissonance in a law that forbids him from striking her
For once I'm on Alec's side. This girl deserved a Baldwin Shot >>>>>>> to the jaw.
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1782537868654592000/pu/vid/avc1/320x568/fUPEunTyWUNbP57L.mp4?tag=12
https://apple.news/A9M48T4LsTYOCvCmG3eY14Q
"The agitator, who hosts a show on social media called Crackhead >>>>>> Barney &
Friends and is known for ambush interviews"
https://www.bowiecreators.com/project/crackhead-barney-and-friends-nyc-interview-fds-festival-performance-lausanne
"shooting and killing cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on the
RUST movie
set in 2021 using a gun he did not know was loaded."
Nice to know they've made that determination.
"This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or
redistributed."
but says
nothing about her emphatically asking for it.
But then the article also says he didn’t know the gun was loaded.
Do you realize how much of an obnoxious, stupid, blithering, idiot
scumbag you
have to be to make Alec Baldwin seem sympathetic; to create a video
that makes
me feel sorry for Alec Baldwin? 'Cause usually when I watch an Alec
Baldwin
video, the emotions I'm accustomed to feeling are irritation, revulsion, >>> scorn. I didn't think it was possible for someone to do or say
anything that
would make me side with Alec Baldwin, but here we are.
In any interaction with Alec Baldwin, you automatically get the
benefit of the
doubt because you are not Alec Baldwin and he is. In order to
squander that
advantage, you have to go out of your way to be as unpleasant as humanly >>> possible. And she managed to do it in less than a minute. I mean,
really,
quite an achievement.
It was almost reminiscent of BOWLING FOR COLUMBINE's finale, where
Michael Moore hounds gun-advocate Charlton Heston around his own home.
Later we learned that Heston was dealing with Alzheimer's, but even on
its own the scene undercuts any humane aspect to Moore's message.
I mean really, you can convolute the fuck out of things but to whine
about a fuckhead who smiles about people being required to pry the gun
out of his "cold dead hands" (or skeletal bones, as the case may now be)
vs the granddaddy of mass shootings is out of whack even by your
standards. How do you put two and two together and keep coming up with fifty million?
On 4/26/24 3:38 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:
atropos@mac.com wrote:
"Ubiquitous" <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
anim8rfsk@cox.net wrote:
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
For once I'm on Alec's side. This girl deserved a Baldwin Shot to the >>>>>> jaw.
"The agitator, who hosts a show on social media called Crackhead Barney >>>>> & Friends and is known for ambush interviews"
https://www.bowiecreators.com/project/crackhead-barney-and-friends-nyc-interview-fds-festival-performance-lausanne
For all her bravado, I would love to see that dumb cunt visit Gaza.
https://ibb.co/BrdfNnB
Bwah!
I have a short story somewhere
In your pants most likely.
On 4/26/2024 4:40 AM, trotsky wrote:
On 4/25/24 1:53 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 4/25/2024 12:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Apr 23, 2024 at 2:49:02 PM PDT, "anim8rfsk" <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
wrote:
moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 4/23/2024 1:04 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:The article says he hit her phone, not her.
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:There's dissonance in a law that forbids him from striking her
For once I'm on Alec's side. This girl deserved a Baldwin Shot >>>>>>>> to the jaw.
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1782537868654592000/pu/vid/avc1/320x568/fUPEunTyWUNbP57L.mp4?tag=12
https://apple.news/A9M48T4LsTYOCvCmG3eY14Q
"The agitator, who hosts a show on social media called
Crackhead Barney &
Friends and is known for ambush interviews"
https://www.bowiecreators.com/project/crackhead-barney-and-friends-nyc-interview-fds-festival-performance-lausanne
"shooting and killing cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on the
RUST movie
set in 2021 using a gun he did not know was loaded."
Nice to know they've made that determination.
"This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or >>>>>>> redistributed."
but says
nothing about her emphatically asking for it.
But then the article also says he didn’t know the gun was loaded.
Do you realize how much of an obnoxious, stupid, blithering, idiot
scumbag you
have to be to make Alec Baldwin seem sympathetic; to create a video
that makes
me feel sorry for Alec Baldwin? 'Cause usually when I watch an Alec
Baldwin
video, the emotions I'm accustomed to feeling are irritation,
revulsion,
scorn. I didn't think it was possible for someone to do or say
anything that
would make me side with Alec Baldwin, but here we are.
In any interaction with Alec Baldwin, you automatically get the
benefit of the
doubt because you are not Alec Baldwin and he is. In order to
squander that
advantage, you have to go out of your way to be as unpleasant as
humanly
possible. And she managed to do it in less than a minute. I mean,
really,
quite an achievement.
It was almost reminiscent of BOWLING FOR COLUMBINE's finale, where
Michael Moore hounds gun-advocate Charlton Heston around his own
home. Later we learned that Heston was dealing with Alzheimer's, but
even on its own the scene undercuts any humane aspect to Moore's
message.
I mean really, you can convolute the fuck out of things but to whine
about a fuckhead who smiles about people being required to pry the gun
out of his "cold dead hands" (or skeletal bones, as the case may now
be) vs the granddaddy of mass shootings is out of whack even by your
standards. How do you put two and two together and keep coming up
with fifty million?
The point is that Moore's visible torture of a decrepit old man evoked
an instinctive viewer-response that transcended policy/politics. It was
a simple failure of technique, costly to his persuasiveness.
If you had any balls
On 4/26/24 11:25 AM, moviePig wrote:
On 4/26/2024 4:40 AM, trotsky wrote:
On 4/25/24 1:53 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 4/25/2024 12:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Apr 23, 2024 at 2:49:02 PM PDT, "anim8rfsk" <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
wrote:
moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 4/23/2024 1:04 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
For once I'm on Alec's side. This girl deserved a Baldwin Shot >>>>>>>> to the jaw.
"The agitator, who hosts a show on social media called
Crackhead Barney & Friends and is known for ambush interviews" >>>>>>>
"shooting and killing cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on the
RUST movie set in 2021 using a gun he did not know was loaded."
Nice to know they've made that determination.
There's dissonance in a law that forbids him from striking her
but says nothing about her emphatically asking for it.
The article says he hit her phone, not her.Do you realize how much of an obnoxious, stupid, blithering, idiot
But then the article also says he didn’t know the gun was loaded. >>>>
scumbag you have to be to make Alec Baldwin seem sympathetic; to
create a video that makes me feel sorry for Alec Baldwin? 'Cause
usually when I watch an Alec Baldwin video, the emotions I'm
accustomed to feeling are irritation, revulsion, scorn. I didn't
think it was possible for someone to do or say anything that would
make me side with Alec Baldwin, but here we are.
In any interaction with Alec Baldwin, you automatically get the
benefit of the doubt because you are not Alec Baldwin and he is.
In order to squander that advantage, you have to go out of your way
to be as unpleasant as humanly possible. And she managed to do it
in less than a minute. I mean, really, quite an achievement.
It was almost reminiscent of BOWLING FOR COLUMBINE's finale, where
Michael Moore hounds gun-advocate Charlton Heston around his own
home. Later we learned that Heston was dealing with Alzheimer's, but
even on its own the scene undercuts any humane aspect to Moore's
message.
I mean really, you can convolute the fuck out of things but to whine
about a fuckhead who smiles about people being required to pry the gun
out of his "cold dead hands" (or skeletal bones, as the case may now
be) vs the granddaddy of mass shootings is out of whack even by your
standards. How do you put two and two together and keep coming up
with fifty million?
The point is that Moore's visible torture of a decrepit old man evoked
an instinctive viewer-response that transcended policy/politics. It was
a simple failure of technique, costly to his persuasiveness.
I used to hang out with a guy who owned guys
On 4/26/24 11:25 AM, moviePig wrote:
On 4/26/2024 4:40 AM, trotsky wrote:
On 4/25/24 1:53 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 4/25/2024 12:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Apr 23, 2024 at 2:49:02 PM PDT, "anim8rfsk" <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
wrote:
moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:Do you realize how much of an obnoxious, stupid, blithering, idiot
On 4/23/2024 1:04 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:The article says he hit her phone, not her.
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:There's dissonance in a law that forbids him from striking her >>>>>>> but says
For once I'm on Alec's side. This girl deserved a Baldwin >>>>>>>>> Shot to the jaw.
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1782537868654592000/pu/vid/avc1/320x568/fUPEunTyWUNbP57L.mp4?tag=12
https://apple.news/A9M48T4LsTYOCvCmG3eY14Q
"The agitator, who hosts a show on social media called
Crackhead Barney &
Friends and is known for ambush interviews"
https://www.bowiecreators.com/project/crackhead-barney-and-friends-nyc-interview-fds-festival-performance-lausanne
"shooting and killing cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on the >>>>>>>> RUST movie
set in 2021 using a gun he did not know was loaded."
Nice to know they've made that determination.
"This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or >>>>>>>> redistributed."
nothing about her emphatically asking for it.
But then the article also says he didn’t know the gun was loaded. >>>>>
scumbag you
have to be to make Alec Baldwin seem sympathetic; to create a video
that makes
me feel sorry for Alec Baldwin? 'Cause usually when I watch an Alec
Baldwin
video, the emotions I'm accustomed to feeling are irritation,
revulsion,
scorn. I didn't think it was possible for someone to do or say
anything that
would make me side with Alec Baldwin, but here we are.
In any interaction with Alec Baldwin, you automatically get the
benefit of the
doubt because you are not Alec Baldwin and he is. In order to
squander that
advantage, you have to go out of your way to be as unpleasant as
humanly
possible. And she managed to do it in less than a minute. I mean,
really,
quite an achievement.
It was almost reminiscent of BOWLING FOR COLUMBINE's finale, where
Michael Moore hounds gun-advocate Charlton Heston around his own
home. Later we learned that Heston was dealing with Alzheimer's, but
even on its own the scene undercuts any humane aspect to Moore's
message.
I mean really, you can convolute the fuck out of things but to whine
about a fuckhead who smiles about people being required to pry the
gun out of his "cold dead hands" (or skeletal bones, as the case may
now be) vs the granddaddy of mass shootings is out of whack even by
your standards. How do you put two and two together and keep coming
up with fifty million?
The point is that Moore's visible torture of a decrepit old man evoked
an instinctive viewer-response that transcended policy/politics. It
was a simple failure of technique, costly to his persuasiveness.
Speak for yourself. Just because you are sympathetic to an asshole
doesn't mean the bulk of the audience was. The reviewers weren't
either. The NRA transformed themselves into a bunch of sick fucks, and Heston was the head asshole before he did us the favor of dying. Fuck
you for even thinking that and being in full dipshit mode. I used to
hang out with a guy who owned guys and I remember watching this thing
they showed kids with a character called Eddie Eagle, teaching kids
about gun safety. The NRA had merit then, that was back in the early
90s. Then they reinvented themselves into a lobbying organization so
the gun industry could profit by selling more and more guns. They are scum. If you don't get this I feel sorry for you.
On 4/26/2024 1:30 PM, trotsky wrote:
On 4/26/24 11:25 AM, moviePig wrote:
On 4/26/2024 4:40 AM, trotsky wrote:
On 4/25/24 1:53 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 4/25/2024 12:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Apr 23, 2024 at 2:49:02 PM PDT, "anim8rfsk" <anim8rfsk@cox.net> >>>>>> wrote:
moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:Do you realize how much of an obnoxious, stupid, blithering, idiot >>>>>> scumbag you
On 4/23/2024 1:04 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:The article says he hit her phone, not her.
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:There's dissonance in a law that forbids him from striking her >>>>>>>> but says
For once I'm on Alec's side. This girl deserved a Baldwin >>>>>>>>>> Shot to the jaw.
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1782537868654592000/pu/vid/avc1/320x568/fUPEunTyWUNbP57L.mp4?tag=12
https://apple.news/A9M48T4LsTYOCvCmG3eY14Q
"The agitator, who hosts a show on social media called
Crackhead Barney &
Friends and is known for ambush interviews"
https://www.bowiecreators.com/project/crackhead-barney-and-friends-nyc-interview-fds-festival-performance-lausanne
"shooting and killing cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on the >>>>>>>>> RUST movie
set in 2021 using a gun he did not know was loaded."
Nice to know they've made that determination.
"This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or >>>>>>>>> redistributed."
nothing about her emphatically asking for it.
But then the article also says he didn’t know the gun was loaded. >>>>>>
have to be to make Alec Baldwin seem sympathetic; to create a
video that makes
me feel sorry for Alec Baldwin? 'Cause usually when I watch an
Alec Baldwin
video, the emotions I'm accustomed to feeling are irritation,
revulsion,
scorn. I didn't think it was possible for someone to do or say
anything that
would make me side with Alec Baldwin, but here we are.
In any interaction with Alec Baldwin, you automatically get the
benefit of the
doubt because you are not Alec Baldwin and he is. In order to
squander that
advantage, you have to go out of your way to be as unpleasant as
humanly
possible. And she managed to do it in less than a minute. I mean,
really,
quite an achievement.
It was almost reminiscent of BOWLING FOR COLUMBINE's finale, where
Michael Moore hounds gun-advocate Charlton Heston around his own
home. Later we learned that Heston was dealing with Alzheimer's,
but even on its own the scene undercuts any humane aspect to
Moore's message.
I mean really, you can convolute the fuck out of things but to whine
about a fuckhead who smiles about people being required to pry the
gun out of his "cold dead hands" (or skeletal bones, as the case may
now be) vs the granddaddy of mass shootings is out of whack even by
your standards. How do you put two and two together and keep coming
up with fifty million?
The point is that Moore's visible torture of a decrepit old man
evoked an instinctive viewer-response that transcended
policy/politics. It was a simple failure of technique, costly to his
persuasiveness.
Speak for yourself. Just because you are sympathetic to an asshole
doesn't mean the bulk of the audience was. The reviewers weren't
either. The NRA transformed themselves into a bunch of sick fucks,
and Heston was the head asshole before he did us the favor of dying.
Fuck you for even thinking that and being in full dipshit mode. I
used to hang out with a guy who owned guys and I remember watching
this thing they showed kids with a character called Eddie Eagle,
teaching kids about gun safety. The NRA had merit then, that was back
in the early 90s. Then they reinvented themselves into a lobbying
organization so the gun industry could profit by selling more and more
guns. They are scum. If you don't get this I feel sorry for you.
I suppose this becomes a matter of how one feels about torture.
On 4/26/24 2:03 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 4/26/2024 1:30 PM, trotsky wrote:
On 4/26/24 11:25 AM, moviePig wrote:
On 4/26/2024 4:40 AM, trotsky wrote:
On 4/25/24 1:53 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 4/25/2024 12:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Apr 23, 2024 at 2:49:02 PM PDT, "anim8rfsk"
<anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:
moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:Do you realize how much of an obnoxious, stupid, blithering,
On 4/23/2024 1:04 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:The article says he hit her phone, not her.
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:There's dissonance in a law that forbids him from striking >>>>>>>>> her but says
For once I'm on Alec's side. This girl deserved a Baldwin >>>>>>>>>>> Shot to the jaw.
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1782537868654592000/pu/vid/avc1/320x568/fUPEunTyWUNbP57L.mp4?tag=12
https://apple.news/A9M48T4LsTYOCvCmG3eY14Q
"The agitator, who hosts a show on social media called
Crackhead Barney &
Friends and is known for ambush interviews"
https://www.bowiecreators.com/project/crackhead-barney-and-friends-nyc-interview-fds-festival-performance-lausanne
"shooting and killing cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on the >>>>>>>>>> RUST movie
set in 2021 using a gun he did not know was loaded."
Nice to know they've made that determination.
"This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or >>>>>>>>>> redistributed."
nothing about her emphatically asking for it.
But then the article also says he didn’t know the gun was loaded. >>>>>>>
idiot scumbag you
have to be to make Alec Baldwin seem sympathetic; to create a
video that makes
me feel sorry for Alec Baldwin? 'Cause usually when I watch an
Alec Baldwin
video, the emotions I'm accustomed to feeling are irritation,
revulsion,
scorn. I didn't think it was possible for someone to do or say
anything that
would make me side with Alec Baldwin, but here we are.
In any interaction with Alec Baldwin, you automatically get the
benefit of the
doubt because you are not Alec Baldwin and he is. In order to
squander that
advantage, you have to go out of your way to be as unpleasant as >>>>>>> humanly
possible. And she managed to do it in less than a minute. I mean, >>>>>>> really,
quite an achievement.
It was almost reminiscent of BOWLING FOR COLUMBINE's finale, where >>>>>> Michael Moore hounds gun-advocate Charlton Heston around his own
home. Later we learned that Heston was dealing with Alzheimer's,
but even on its own the scene undercuts any humane aspect to
Moore's message.
I mean really, you can convolute the fuck out of things but to
whine about a fuckhead who smiles about people being required to
pry the gun out of his "cold dead hands" (or skeletal bones, as the
case may now be) vs the granddaddy of mass shootings is out of
whack even by your standards. How do you put two and two together
and keep coming up with fifty million?
The point is that Moore's visible torture of a decrepit old man
evoked an instinctive viewer-response that transcended
policy/politics. It was a simple failure of technique, costly to
his persuasiveness.
Speak for yourself. Just because you are sympathetic to an asshole
doesn't mean the bulk of the audience was. The reviewers weren't
either. The NRA transformed themselves into a bunch of sick fucks,
and Heston was the head asshole before he did us the favor of dying.
Fuck you for even thinking that and being in full dipshit mode. I
used to hang out with a guy who owned guys and I remember watching
this thing they showed kids with a character called Eddie Eagle,
teaching kids about gun safety. The NRA had merit then, that was
back in the early 90s. Then they reinvented themselves into a
lobbying organization so the gun industry could profit by selling
more and more guns. They are scum. If you don't get this I feel
sorry for you.
I suppose this becomes a matter of how one feels about torture.
It's not that hard to make a distinction between harassment and torture.
Try harder. I know you know what the words actually mean so stop
fucking around.
On 4/27/2024 4:19 AM, trotsky wrote:
On 4/26/24 2:03 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 4/26/2024 1:30 PM, trotsky wrote:
On 4/26/24 11:25 AM, moviePig wrote:
On 4/26/2024 4:40 AM, trotsky wrote:
On 4/25/24 1:53 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 4/25/2024 12:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Apr 23, 2024 at 2:49:02 PM PDT, "anim8rfsk"
<anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:
moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:Do you realize how much of an obnoxious, stupid, blithering,
On 4/23/2024 1:04 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:The article says he hit her phone, not her.
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:There's dissonance in a law that forbids him from striking >>>>>>>>>> her but says
For once I'm on Alec's side. This girl deserved a Baldwin >>>>>>>>>>>> Shot to the jaw.
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1782537868654592000/pu/vid/avc1/320x568/fUPEunTyWUNbP57L.mp4?tag=12
https://apple.news/A9M48T4LsTYOCvCmG3eY14Q
"The agitator, who hosts a show on social media called >>>>>>>>>>> Crackhead Barney &
Friends and is known for ambush interviews"
https://www.bowiecreators.com/project/crackhead-barney-and-friends-nyc-interview-fds-festival-performance-lausanne
"shooting and killing cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on >>>>>>>>>>> the RUST movie
set in 2021 using a gun he did not know was loaded."
Nice to know they've made that determination.
"This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or >>>>>>>>>>> redistributed."
nothing about her emphatically asking for it.
But then the article also says he didn’t know the gun was loaded. >>>>>>>>
idiot scumbag you
have to be to make Alec Baldwin seem sympathetic; to create a
video that makes
me feel sorry for Alec Baldwin? 'Cause usually when I watch an >>>>>>>> Alec Baldwin
video, the emotions I'm accustomed to feeling are irritation,
revulsion,
scorn. I didn't think it was possible for someone to do or say >>>>>>>> anything that
would make me side with Alec Baldwin, but here we are.
In any interaction with Alec Baldwin, you automatically get the >>>>>>>> benefit of the
doubt because you are not Alec Baldwin and he is. In order to
squander that
advantage, you have to go out of your way to be as unpleasant as >>>>>>>> humanly
possible. And she managed to do it in less than a minute. I
mean, really,
quite an achievement.
It was almost reminiscent of BOWLING FOR COLUMBINE's finale,
where Michael Moore hounds gun-advocate Charlton Heston around
his own home. Later we learned that Heston was dealing with
Alzheimer's, but even on its own the scene undercuts any humane
aspect to Moore's message.
I mean really, you can convolute the fuck out of things but to
whine about a fuckhead who smiles about people being required to
pry the gun out of his "cold dead hands" (or skeletal bones, as
the case may now be) vs the granddaddy of mass shootings is out of >>>>>> whack even by your standards. How do you put two and two together >>>>>> and keep coming up with fifty million?
The point is that Moore's visible torture of a decrepit old man
evoked an instinctive viewer-response that transcended
policy/politics. It was a simple failure of technique, costly to
his persuasiveness.
Speak for yourself. Just because you are sympathetic to an asshole
doesn't mean the bulk of the audience was. The reviewers weren't
either. The NRA transformed themselves into a bunch of sick fucks,
and Heston was the head asshole before he did us the favor of dying.
Fuck you for even thinking that and being in full dipshit mode. I
used to hang out with a guy who owned guys and I remember watching
this thing they showed kids with a character called Eddie Eagle,
teaching kids about gun safety. The NRA had merit then, that was
back in the early 90s. Then they reinvented themselves into a
lobbying organization so the gun industry could profit by selling
more and more guns. They are scum. If you don't get this I feel
sorry for you.
I suppose this becomes a matter of how one feels about torture.
It's not that hard to make a distinction between harassment and
torture. Try harder. I know you know what the words actually mean
so stop fucking around.
The distinction is a matter of degree. What's the same is the motive.
On 4/27/24 11:01 AM, moviePig wrote:
On 4/27/2024 4:19 AM, trotsky wrote:
On 4/26/24 2:03 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 4/26/2024 1:30 PM, trotsky wrote:
On 4/26/24 11:25 AM, moviePig wrote:
On 4/26/2024 4:40 AM, trotsky wrote:
On 4/25/24 1:53 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 4/25/2024 12:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Apr 23, 2024 at 2:49:02 PM PDT, "anim8rfsk"
<anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:
moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:Do you realize how much of an obnoxious, stupid, blithering, >>>>>>>>> idiot scumbag you
On 4/23/2024 1:04 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:The article says he hit her phone, not her.
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:There's dissonance in a law that forbids him from striking >>>>>>>>>>> her but says
For once I'm on Alec's side. This girl deserved a Baldwin >>>>>>>>>>>>> Shot to the jaw.
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1782537868654592000/pu/vid/avc1/320x568/fUPEunTyWUNbP57L.mp4?tag=12
https://apple.news/A9M48T4LsTYOCvCmG3eY14Q
"The agitator, who hosts a show on social media called >>>>>>>>>>>> Crackhead Barney &
Friends and is known for ambush interviews"
https://www.bowiecreators.com/project/crackhead-barney-and-friends-nyc-interview-fds-festival-performance-lausanne
"shooting and killing cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on >>>>>>>>>>>> the RUST movie
set in 2021 using a gun he did not know was loaded." >>>>>>>>>>>> Nice to know they've made that determination.
"This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or >>>>>>>>>>>> redistributed."
nothing about her emphatically asking for it.
But then the article also says he didn’t know the gun was loaded. >>>>>>>>>
have to be to make Alec Baldwin seem sympathetic; to create a >>>>>>>>> video that makes
me feel sorry for Alec Baldwin? 'Cause usually when I watch an >>>>>>>>> Alec Baldwin
video, the emotions I'm accustomed to feeling are irritation, >>>>>>>>> revulsion,
scorn. I didn't think it was possible for someone to do or say >>>>>>>>> anything that
would make me side with Alec Baldwin, but here we are.
In any interaction with Alec Baldwin, you automatically get the >>>>>>>>> benefit of the
doubt because you are not Alec Baldwin and he is. In order to >>>>>>>>> squander that
advantage, you have to go out of your way to be as unpleasant >>>>>>>>> as humanly
possible. And she managed to do it in less than a minute. I
mean, really,
quite an achievement.
It was almost reminiscent of BOWLING FOR COLUMBINE's finale,
where Michael Moore hounds gun-advocate Charlton Heston around >>>>>>>> his own home. Later we learned that Heston was dealing with
Alzheimer's, but even on its own the scene undercuts any humane >>>>>>>> aspect to Moore's message.
I mean really, you can convolute the fuck out of things but to
whine about a fuckhead who smiles about people being required to >>>>>>> pry the gun out of his "cold dead hands" (or skeletal bones, as
the case may now be) vs the granddaddy of mass shootings is out
of whack even by your standards. How do you put two and two
together and keep coming up with fifty million?
The point is that Moore's visible torture of a decrepit old man
evoked an instinctive viewer-response that transcended
policy/politics. It was a simple failure of technique, costly to >>>>>> his persuasiveness.
Speak for yourself. Just because you are sympathetic to an asshole >>>>> doesn't mean the bulk of the audience was. The reviewers weren't
either. The NRA transformed themselves into a bunch of sick fucks, >>>>> and Heston was the head asshole before he did us the favor of
dying. Fuck you for even thinking that and being in full dipshit
mode. I used to hang out with a guy who owned guys and I remember
watching this thing they showed kids with a character called Eddie
Eagle, teaching kids about gun safety. The NRA had merit then,
that was back in the early 90s. Then they reinvented themselves
into a lobbying organization so the gun industry could profit by
selling more and more guns. They are scum. If you don't get this >>>>> I feel sorry for you.
I suppose this becomes a matter of how one feels about torture.
It's not that hard to make a distinction between harassment and
torture. Try harder. I know you know what the words actually mean
so stop fucking around.
The distinction is a matter of degree. What's the same is the motive.
And you're claiming that to be what? Because what I'm hearing is your thoughts are so fucked up and twisted that you think Chuck Heston's
treatment was more heinous than the massacre at Columbine.
In article <v0ec7v$36anb$1@dont-email.me>, super70s@super70s.invalid wrote:
On 2024-04-25 19:06:46 +0000, moviePig said:
On 4/25/2024 2:01 PM, shawn wrote:
On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 17:12:03 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
"super70s" <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2024-04-23 17:04:10 +0000, anim8rfsk said:
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
For once I'm on Alec's side. This girl deserved a Baldwin Shot to the >>>>>>>> jaw.
https://apple.news/A9M48T4LsTYOCvCmG3eY14Q
"The agitator, who hosts a show on social media called Crackhead >>>>>>> Barney & Friends and is known for ambush interviews"
They showed it on TMZ Live, from "why did you shoot that girl" to "say >>>>>> Free Palestine...say it just once"?
She's gonna ambush the wrong person one of these days, probably from >>>>>> her own hood.
What is it with this thing protesters do these days where they demand >>>>> their target repeat a phrase? They did this to Occasional-Cortex and now >>>>> Alec Baldwin-- in both cases they wanted them to recite "Free
Palestine".
Even if Baldwin doesn't believe it, she wants him to just say it. If >>>>> you're a normal person and you watch that, you think, what value is
there in making him say it?
I'm not sure what she intended. I'm sure someone would clip out his
just saying the phrase and use that to show more support for Palestine >>>> but I'm not sure if that was her point. More likely it's just the hot
phrase that can generate clicks so she's using it. After all she can
use it as a title to draw in the clicks "Alec Baldwin says Free
Palestine!"
Let's say you succeed and he says the phrase. He's only saying it
because you have hectored and harassed him into saying it and he figures >>>>> you'll go away if he does. He's only saying it because you won't shut >>>>> up, not because he believes it. You haven't changed his mind or
anything. He's just repeating a phrase that you have assigned to him. >>>>> What do you get out of that? What does that accomplish? What's the
point?
The clicks are all that matters.
They did this during the BLM Summer of Love riots, too. They'd burst >>>>> into restaurants and surround white people eating dinner and demand
that they say "black lives matter".
My response as a nobody who doesn't have a social media following
would be to say "Black lives don't matter" just to watch them lose
their minds. Demanding any sort of comment from me isn't going to get
the desired response unless I'm in fear of damage to my person.
Leftists seem to take this approach on every issue, in every situation. >>>>> It seems intellectually adjacent to the pronoun stuff with the troons. >>>>> You *must* say the words they want regardless of whether you believe >>>>> them or not.
Not only don't they care if you actually believe the words, they almost >>>>> *prefer* that you not believe them. Because that shows their power over >>>>> you. If you believed the words, then they haven't really exercised any >>>>> power over you, but if they can make you say shit you don't believe in >>>>> because they've scared or intimidated you into doing so, then they have >>>>> bright line evidence of the power they wield.
Power that amounts to nothing in the real world. Maybe it makes them
feel good but it is only going to make people turn against them and
their ideas. It's like winning the battle at the cost of losing the
war.
I doubt there's evidence this is the province of "leftists".
I understand Jesse Watters started his (in)auspicious career doing
"ambushes" for Bill O'Reilly.
Your understanding is wrong.
On 4/27/2024 1:45 PM, trotsky wrote:
On 4/27/24 11:01 AM, moviePig wrote:
On 4/27/2024 4:19 AM, trotsky wrote:
On 4/26/24 2:03 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 4/26/2024 1:30 PM, trotsky wrote:
On 4/26/24 11:25 AM, moviePig wrote:
On 4/26/2024 4:40 AM, trotsky wrote:
On 4/25/24 1:53 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 4/25/2024 12:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Apr 23, 2024 at 2:49:02 PM PDT, "anim8rfsk"
<anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:
moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 4/23/2024 1:04 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:The article says he hit her phone, not her.
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:There's dissonance in a law that forbids him from striking >>>>>>>>>>>> her but says
For once I'm on Alec's side. This girl deserved a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Baldwin Shot to the jaw.
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1782537868654592000/pu/vid/avc1/320x568/fUPEunTyWUNbP57L.mp4?tag=12
https://apple.news/A9M48T4LsTYOCvCmG3eY14Q
"The agitator, who hosts a show on social media called >>>>>>>>>>>>> Crackhead Barney &
Friends and is known for ambush interviews"
https://www.bowiecreators.com/project/crackhead-barney-and-friends-nyc-interview-fds-festival-performance-lausanne
"shooting and killing cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on >>>>>>>>>>>>> the RUST movie
set in 2021 using a gun he did not know was loaded." >>>>>>>>>>>>> Nice to know they've made that determination.
"This material may not be published, broadcast,
rewritten, or
redistributed."
nothing about her emphatically asking for it.
But then the article also says he didn’t know the gun was >>>>>>>>>>> loaded.
Do you realize how much of an obnoxious, stupid, blithering, >>>>>>>>>> idiot scumbag you
have to be to make Alec Baldwin seem sympathetic; to create a >>>>>>>>>> video that makes
me feel sorry for Alec Baldwin? 'Cause usually when I watch an >>>>>>>>>> Alec Baldwin
video, the emotions I'm accustomed to feeling are irritation, >>>>>>>>>> revulsion,
scorn. I didn't think it was possible for someone to do or say >>>>>>>>>> anything that
would make me side with Alec Baldwin, but here we are.
In any interaction with Alec Baldwin, you automatically get >>>>>>>>>> the benefit of the
doubt because you are not Alec Baldwin and he is. In order to >>>>>>>>>> squander that
advantage, you have to go out of your way to be as unpleasant >>>>>>>>>> as humanly
possible. And she managed to do it in less than a minute. I >>>>>>>>>> mean, really,
quite an achievement.
It was almost reminiscent of BOWLING FOR COLUMBINE's finale, >>>>>>>>> where Michael Moore hounds gun-advocate Charlton Heston around >>>>>>>>> his own home. Later we learned that Heston was dealing with
Alzheimer's, but even on its own the scene undercuts any humane >>>>>>>>> aspect to Moore's message.
I mean really, you can convolute the fuck out of things but to >>>>>>>> whine about a fuckhead who smiles about people being required to >>>>>>>> pry the gun out of his "cold dead hands" (or skeletal bones, as >>>>>>>> the case may now be) vs the granddaddy of mass shootings is out >>>>>>>> of whack even by your standards. How do you put two and two
together and keep coming up with fifty million?
The point is that Moore's visible torture of a decrepit old man
evoked an instinctive viewer-response that transcended
policy/politics. It was a simple failure of technique, costly to >>>>>>> his persuasiveness.
Speak for yourself. Just because you are sympathetic to an
asshole doesn't mean the bulk of the audience was. The reviewers >>>>>> weren't either. The NRA transformed themselves into a bunch of
sick fucks, and Heston was the head asshole before he did us the
favor of dying. Fuck you for even thinking that and being in full
dipshit mode. I used to hang out with a guy who owned guys and I >>>>>> remember watching this thing they showed kids with a character
called Eddie Eagle, teaching kids about gun safety. The NRA had
merit then, that was back in the early 90s. Then they reinvented >>>>>> themselves into a lobbying organization so the gun industry could
profit by selling more and more guns. They are scum. If you
don't get this I feel sorry for you.
I suppose this becomes a matter of how one feels about torture.
It's not that hard to make a distinction between harassment and
torture. Try harder. I know you know what the words actually mean >>>> so stop fucking around.
The distinction is a matter of degree. What's the same is the motive.
And you're claiming that to be what? Because what I'm hearing is your
thoughts are so fucked up and twisted that you think Chuck Heston's
treatment was more heinous than the massacre at Columbine.
Without any material (and, even then, likely dubious) aim, torture and harassment are merely about delighting in causing someone pain.
On 4/27/24 2:02 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 4/27/2024 1:45 PM, trotsky wrote:
On 4/27/24 11:01 AM, moviePig wrote:
On 4/27/2024 4:19 AM, trotsky wrote:
On 4/26/24 2:03 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 4/26/2024 1:30 PM, trotsky wrote:
On 4/26/24 11:25 AM, moviePig wrote:
On 4/26/2024 4:40 AM, trotsky wrote:
On 4/25/24 1:53 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 4/25/2024 12:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Apr 23, 2024 at 2:49:02 PM PDT, "anim8rfsk"
<anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:
moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 4/23/2024 1:04 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:The article says he hit her phone, not her.
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:There's dissonance in a law that forbids him from >>>>>>>>>>>>> striking her but says
For once I'm on Alec's side. This girl deserved a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Baldwin Shot to the jaw.
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1782537868654592000/pu/vid/avc1/320x568/fUPEunTyWUNbP57L.mp4?tag=12
https://apple.news/A9M48T4LsTYOCvCmG3eY14Q
"The agitator, who hosts a show on social media called >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Crackhead Barney &
Friends and is known for ambush interviews"
https://www.bowiecreators.com/project/crackhead-barney-and-friends-nyc-interview-fds-festival-performance-lausanne
"shooting and killing cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the RUST movie
set in 2021 using a gun he did not know was loaded." >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nice to know they've made that determination.
"This material may not be published, broadcast, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rewritten, or
redistributed."
nothing about her emphatically asking for it.
But then the article also says he didn’t know the gun was >>>>>>>>>>>> loaded.
Do you realize how much of an obnoxious, stupid, blithering, >>>>>>>>>>> idiot scumbag you
have to be to make Alec Baldwin seem sympathetic; to create a >>>>>>>>>>> video that makes
me feel sorry for Alec Baldwin? 'Cause usually when I watch >>>>>>>>>>> an Alec Baldwin
video, the emotions I'm accustomed to feeling are irritation, >>>>>>>>>>> revulsion,
scorn. I didn't think it was possible for someone to do or >>>>>>>>>>> say anything that
would make me side with Alec Baldwin, but here we are.
In any interaction with Alec Baldwin, you automatically get >>>>>>>>>>> the benefit of the
doubt because you are not Alec Baldwin and he is. In order to >>>>>>>>>>> squander that
advantage, you have to go out of your way to be as unpleasant >>>>>>>>>>> as humanly
possible. And she managed to do it in less than a minute. I >>>>>>>>>>> mean, really,
quite an achievement.
It was almost reminiscent of BOWLING FOR COLUMBINE's finale, >>>>>>>>>> where Michael Moore hounds gun-advocate Charlton Heston around >>>>>>>>>> his own home. Later we learned that Heston was dealing with >>>>>>>>>> Alzheimer's, but even on its own the scene undercuts any
humane aspect to Moore's message.
I mean really, you can convolute the fuck out of things but to >>>>>>>>> whine about a fuckhead who smiles about people being required >>>>>>>>> to pry the gun out of his "cold dead hands" (or skeletal bones, >>>>>>>>> as the case may now be) vs the granddaddy of mass shootings is >>>>>>>>> out of whack even by your standards. How do you put two and >>>>>>>>> two together and keep coming up with fifty million?
The point is that Moore's visible torture of a decrepit old man >>>>>>>> evoked an instinctive viewer-response that transcended
policy/politics. It was a simple failure of technique, costly >>>>>>>> to his persuasiveness.
Speak for yourself. Just because you are sympathetic to an
asshole doesn't mean the bulk of the audience was. The reviewers >>>>>>> weren't either. The NRA transformed themselves into a bunch of >>>>>>> sick fucks, and Heston was the head asshole before he did us the >>>>>>> favor of dying. Fuck you for even thinking that and being in full >>>>>>> dipshit mode. I used to hang out with a guy who owned guys and I >>>>>>> remember watching this thing they showed kids with a character
called Eddie Eagle, teaching kids about gun safety. The NRA had >>>>>>> merit then, that was back in the early 90s. Then they reinvented >>>>>>> themselves into a lobbying organization so the gun industry could >>>>>>> profit by selling more and more guns. They are scum. If you
don't get this I feel sorry for you.
I suppose this becomes a matter of how one feels about torture.
It's not that hard to make a distinction between harassment and
torture. Try harder. I know you know what the words actually
mean so stop fucking around.
The distinction is a matter of degree. What's the same is the motive. >>>
And you're claiming that to be what? Because what I'm hearing is
your thoughts are so fucked up and twisted that you think Chuck
Heston's treatment was more heinous than the massacre at Columbine.
Without any material (and, even then, likely dubious) aim, torture and
harassment are merely about delighting in causing someone pain.
So what you're saying is the guy who belongs to the "pull yourself up by
the bootstraps" party was in a lot of emotional pain there? Is this
some sort of exercise in disingenuousness? Hell, no gun was pulled from
his cold dead hands, why didn't he brandish one at MM? Let me guess: he
was just a doddering old fool at that point and just lucked out by being President of the biggest lobbying organization in the history of Washington. Makes sense.
On 4/27/24 2:02 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 4/27/2024 1:45 PM, trotsky wrote:
On 4/27/24 11:01 AM, moviePig wrote:
On 4/27/2024 4:19 AM, trotsky wrote:
On 4/26/24 2:03 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 4/26/2024 1:30 PM, trotsky wrote:
On 4/26/24 11:25 AM, moviePig wrote:
On 4/26/2024 4:40 AM, trotsky wrote:
On 4/25/24 1:53 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 4/25/2024 12:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Apr 23, 2024 at 2:49:02 PM PDT, "anim8rfsk"
<anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:
moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 4/23/2024 1:04 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:The article says he hit her phone, not her.
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:There's dissonance in a law that forbids him from striking >>>>>>>>>>>>> her but says
For once I'm on Alec's side. This girl deserved a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Baldwin Shot to the jaw.
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1782537868654592000/pu/vid/avc1/320x568/fUPEunTyWUNbP57L.mp4?tag=12
https://apple.news/A9M48T4LsTYOCvCmG3eY14Q
"The agitator, who hosts a show on social media called >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Crackhead Barney &
Friends and is known for ambush interviews"
https://www.bowiecreators.com/project/crackhead-barney-and-friends-nyc-interview-fds-festival-performance-lausanne
"shooting and killing cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the RUST movie
set in 2021 using a gun he did not know was loaded." >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nice to know they've made that determination.
"This material may not be published, broadcast, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rewritten, or
redistributed."
nothing about her emphatically asking for it.
But then the article also says he didn’t know the gun was >>>>>>>>>>>> loaded.
Do you realize how much of an obnoxious, stupid, blithering, >>>>>>>>>>> idiot scumbag you
have to be to make Alec Baldwin seem sympathetic; to create a >>>>>>>>>>> video that makes
me feel sorry for Alec Baldwin? 'Cause usually when I watch an >>>>>>>>>>> Alec Baldwin
video, the emotions I'm accustomed to feeling are irritation, >>>>>>>>>>> revulsion,
scorn. I didn't think it was possible for someone to do or say >>>>>>>>>>> anything that
would make me side with Alec Baldwin, but here we are.
In any interaction with Alec Baldwin, you automatically get >>>>>>>>>>> the benefit of the
doubt because you are not Alec Baldwin and he is. In order to >>>>>>>>>>> squander that
advantage, you have to go out of your way to be as unpleasant >>>>>>>>>>> as humanly
possible. And she managed to do it in less than a minute. I >>>>>>>>>>> mean, really,
quite an achievement.
It was almost reminiscent of BOWLING FOR COLUMBINE's finale, >>>>>>>>>> where Michael Moore hounds gun-advocate Charlton Heston around >>>>>>>>>> his own home. Later we learned that Heston was dealing with >>>>>>>>>> Alzheimer's, but even on its own the scene undercuts any humane >>>>>>>>>> aspect to Moore's message.
I mean really, you can convolute the fuck out of things but to >>>>>>>>> whine about a fuckhead who smiles about people being required to >>>>>>>>> pry the gun out of his "cold dead hands" (or skeletal bones, as >>>>>>>>> the case may now be) vs the granddaddy of mass shootings is out >>>>>>>>> of whack even by your standards. How do you put two and two >>>>>>>>> together and keep coming up with fifty million?
The point is that Moore's visible torture of a decrepit old man >>>>>>>> evoked an instinctive viewer-response that transcended
policy/politics. It was a simple failure of technique, costly to >>>>>>>> his persuasiveness.
Speak for yourself. Just because you are sympathetic to an
asshole doesn't mean the bulk of the audience was. The reviewers >>>>>>> weren't either. The NRA transformed themselves into a bunch of >>>>>>> sick fucks, and Heston was the head asshole before he did us the >>>>>>> favor of dying. Fuck you for even thinking that and being in full >>>>>>> dipshit mode. I used to hang out with a guy who owned guys and I >>>>>>> remember watching this thing they showed kids with a character
called Eddie Eagle, teaching kids about gun safety. The NRA had >>>>>>> merit then, that was back in the early 90s. Then they reinvented >>>>>>> themselves into a lobbying organization so the gun industry could >>>>>>> profit by selling more and more guns. They are scum. If you >>>>>>> don't get this I feel sorry for you.
I suppose this becomes a matter of how one feels about torture.
It's not that hard to make a distinction between harassment and
torture. Try harder. I know you know what the words actually mean >>>>> so stop fucking around.
The distinction is a matter of degree. What's the same is the motive. >>>
And you're claiming that to be what? Because what I'm hearing is your >>> thoughts are so fucked up and twisted that you think Chuck Heston's
treatment was more heinous than the massacre at Columbine.
Without any material (and, even then, likely dubious) aim, torture and
harassment are merely about delighting in causing someone pain.
was just a doddering old fool at that point and just lucked out by being President of the biggest lobbying organization in the history of
Washington.
On 4/28/2024 6:19 AM, trotsky wrote:
On 4/27/24 2:02 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 4/27/2024 1:45 PM, trotsky wrote:
On 4/27/24 11:01 AM, moviePig wrote:
On 4/27/2024 4:19 AM, trotsky wrote:
On 4/26/24 2:03 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 4/26/2024 1:30 PM, trotsky wrote:
On 4/26/24 11:25 AM, moviePig wrote:
On 4/26/2024 4:40 AM, trotsky wrote:
On 4/25/24 1:53 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 4/25/2024 12:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Apr 23, 2024 at 2:49:02 PM PDT, "anim8rfsk"
<anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:
moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 4/23/2024 1:04 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:The article says he hit her phone, not her.
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:There's dissonance in a law that forbids him from >>>>>>>>>>>>>> striking her but says
For once I'm on Alec's side. This girl deserved a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Baldwin Shot to the jaw.
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1782537868654592000/pu/vid/avc1/320x568/fUPEunTyWUNbP57L.mp4?tag=12
https://apple.news/A9M48T4LsTYOCvCmG3eY14Q
"The agitator, who hosts a show on social media called >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Crackhead Barney &
Friends and is known for ambush interviews"
https://www.bowiecreators.com/project/crackhead-barney-and-friends-nyc-interview-fds-festival-performance-lausanne
"shooting and killing cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the RUST movie
set in 2021 using a gun he did not know was loaded." >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nice to know they've made that determination. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "This material may not be published, broadcast, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rewritten, or
redistributed."
nothing about her emphatically asking for it.
But then the article also says he didn’t know the gun was >>>>>>>>>>>>> loaded.
Do you realize how much of an obnoxious, stupid, blithering, >>>>>>>>>>>> idiot scumbag you
have to be to make Alec Baldwin seem sympathetic; to create a >>>>>>>>>>>> video that makes
me feel sorry for Alec Baldwin? 'Cause usually when I watch >>>>>>>>>>>> an Alec Baldwin
video, the emotions I'm accustomed to feeling are irritation, >>>>>>>>>>>> revulsion,
scorn. I didn't think it was possible for someone to do or >>>>>>>>>>>> say anything that
would make me side with Alec Baldwin, but here we are. >>>>>>>>>>>>
In any interaction with Alec Baldwin, you automatically get >>>>>>>>>>>> the benefit of the
doubt because you are not Alec Baldwin and he is. In order to >>>>>>>>>>>> squander that
advantage, you have to go out of your way to be as unpleasant >>>>>>>>>>>> as humanly
possible. And she managed to do it in less than a minute. I >>>>>>>>>>>> mean, really,
quite an achievement.
It was almost reminiscent of BOWLING FOR COLUMBINE's finale, >>>>>>>>>>> where Michael Moore hounds gun-advocate Charlton Heston around >>>>>>>>>>> his own home. Later we learned that Heston was dealing with >>>>>>>>>>> Alzheimer's, but even on its own the scene undercuts any >>>>>>>>>>> humane aspect to Moore's message.
I mean really, you can convolute the fuck out of things but to >>>>>>>>>> whine about a fuckhead who smiles about people being required >>>>>>>>>> to pry the gun out of his "cold dead hands" (or skeletal bones, >>>>>>>>>> as the case may now be) vs the granddaddy of mass shootings is >>>>>>>>>> out of whack even by your standards. How do you put two and >>>>>>>>>> two together and keep coming up with fifty million?
The point is that Moore's visible torture of a decrepit old man >>>>>>>>> evoked an instinctive viewer-response that transcended
policy/politics. It was a simple failure of technique, costly >>>>>>>>> to his persuasiveness.
Speak for yourself. Just because you are sympathetic to an
asshole doesn't mean the bulk of the audience was. The reviewers >>>>>>>> weren't either. The NRA transformed themselves into a bunch of >>>>>>>> sick fucks, and Heston was the head asshole before he did us the >>>>>>>> favor of dying. Fuck you for even thinking that and being in full >>>>>>>> dipshit mode. I used to hang out with a guy who owned guys and I >>>>>>>> remember watching this thing they showed kids with a character >>>>>>>> called Eddie Eagle, teaching kids about gun safety. The NRA had >>>>>>>> merit then, that was back in the early 90s. Then they reinvented >>>>>>>> themselves into a lobbying organization so the gun industry could >>>>>>>> profit by selling more and more guns. They are scum. If you >>>>>>>> don't get this I feel sorry for you.
I suppose this becomes a matter of how one feels about torture.
It's not that hard to make a distinction between harassment and
torture. Try harder. I know you know what the words actually >>>>>> mean so stop fucking around.
The distinction is a matter of degree. What's the same is the motive. >>>>
And you're claiming that to be what? Because what I'm hearing is
your thoughts are so fucked up and twisted that you think Chuck
Heston's treatment was more heinous than the massacre at Columbine.
Without any material (and, even then, likely dubious) aim, torture and
harassment are merely about delighting in causing someone pain.
So what you're saying is the guy who belongs to the "pull yourself up by
the bootstraps" party was in a lot of emotional pain there? Is this
some sort of exercise in disingenuousness? Hell, no gun was pulled from
his cold dead hands, why didn't he brandish one at MM? Let me guess: he
was just a doddering old fool at that point and just lucked out by being
President of the biggest lobbying organization in the history of
Washington. Makes sense.
What I'm saying is that, if there's nothing to gain from torture, you're
left with merely the question of whether to cheer for it.
moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 4/28/2024 6:19 AM, trotsky wrote:
On 4/27/24 2:02 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 4/27/2024 1:45 PM, trotsky wrote:
On 4/27/24 11:01 AM, moviePig wrote:
On 4/27/2024 4:19 AM, trotsky wrote:
On 4/26/24 2:03 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 4/26/2024 1:30 PM, trotsky wrote:
On 4/26/24 11:25 AM, moviePig wrote:
On 4/26/2024 4:40 AM, trotsky wrote:
On 4/25/24 1:53 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 4/25/2024 12:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Apr 23, 2024 at 2:49:02 PM PDT, "anim8rfsk"
<anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:
moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 4/23/2024 1:04 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:There's dissonance in a law that forbids him from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> striking her but says
For once I'm on Alec's side. This girl deserved a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Baldwin Shot to the jaw.
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1782537868654592000/pu/vid/avc1/320x568/fUPEunTyWUNbP57L.mp4?tag=12
https://apple.news/A9M48T4LsTYOCvCmG3eY14Q >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "The agitator, who hosts a show on social media called >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Crackhead Barney &
Friends and is known for ambush interviews" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://www.bowiecreators.com/project/crackhead-barney-and-friends-nyc-interview-fds-festival-performance-lausanne
"shooting and killing cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the RUST movie
set in 2021 using a gun he did not know was loaded." >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nice to know they've made that determination. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "This material may not be published, broadcast, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rewritten, or
redistributed."
nothing about her emphatically asking for it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The article says he hit her phone, not her.
But then the article also says he didn’t know the gun was >>>>>>>>>>>>>> loaded.
Do you realize how much of an obnoxious, stupid, blithering, >>>>>>>>>>>>> idiot scumbag you
have to be to make Alec Baldwin seem sympathetic; to create a >>>>>>>>>>>>> video that makes
me feel sorry for Alec Baldwin? 'Cause usually when I watch >>>>>>>>>>>>> an Alec Baldwin
video, the emotions I'm accustomed to feeling are irritation, >>>>>>>>>>>>> revulsion,
scorn. I didn't think it was possible for someone to do or >>>>>>>>>>>>> say anything that
would make me side with Alec Baldwin, but here we are. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
In any interaction with Alec Baldwin, you automatically get >>>>>>>>>>>>> the benefit of the
doubt because you are not Alec Baldwin and he is. In order to >>>>>>>>>>>>> squander that
advantage, you have to go out of your way to be as unpleasant >>>>>>>>>>>>> as humanly
possible. And she managed to do it in less than a minute. I >>>>>>>>>>>>> mean, really,
quite an achievement.
It was almost reminiscent of BOWLING FOR COLUMBINE's finale, >>>>>>>>>>>> where Michael Moore hounds gun-advocate Charlton Heston around >>>>>>>>>>>> his own home. Later we learned that Heston was dealing with >>>>>>>>>>>> Alzheimer's, but even on its own the scene undercuts any >>>>>>>>>>>> humane aspect to Moore's message.
I mean really, you can convolute the fuck out of things but to >>>>>>>>>>> whine about a fuckhead who smiles about people being required >>>>>>>>>>> to pry the gun out of his "cold dead hands" (or skeletal bones, >>>>>>>>>>> as the case may now be) vs the granddaddy of mass shootings is >>>>>>>>>>> out of whack even by your standards. How do you put two and >>>>>>>>>>> two together and keep coming up with fifty million?
The point is that Moore's visible torture of a decrepit old man >>>>>>>>>> evoked an instinctive viewer-response that transcended
policy/politics. It was a simple failure of technique, costly >>>>>>>>>> to his persuasiveness.
Speak for yourself. Just because you are sympathetic to an >>>>>>>>> asshole doesn't mean the bulk of the audience was. The reviewers >>>>>>>>> weren't either. The NRA transformed themselves into a bunch of >>>>>>>>> sick fucks, and Heston was the head asshole before he did us the >>>>>>>>> favor of dying. Fuck you for even thinking that and being in full >>>>>>>>> dipshit mode. I used to hang out with a guy who owned guys and I >>>>>>>>> remember watching this thing they showed kids with a character >>>>>>>>> called Eddie Eagle, teaching kids about gun safety. The NRA had >>>>>>>>> merit then, that was back in the early 90s. Then they reinvented >>>>>>>>> themselves into a lobbying organization so the gun industry could >>>>>>>>> profit by selling more and more guns. They are scum. If you >>>>>>>>> don't get this I feel sorry for you.
I suppose this becomes a matter of how one feels about torture. >>>>>>>
It's not that hard to make a distinction between harassment and
torture. Try harder. I know you know what the words actually >>>>>>> mean so stop fucking around.
The distinction is a matter of degree. What's the same is the motive. >>>>>
And you're claiming that to be what? Because what I'm hearing is
your thoughts are so fucked up and twisted that you think Chuck
Heston's treatment was more heinous than the massacre at Columbine.
Without any material (and, even then, likely dubious) aim, torture and >>>> harassment are merely about delighting in causing someone pain.
So what you're saying is the guy who belongs to the "pull yourself up by >>> the bootstraps" party was in a lot of emotional pain there? Is this
some sort of exercise in disingenuousness? Hell, no gun was pulled from >>> his cold dead hands, why didn't he brandish one at MM? Let me guess: he >>> was just a doddering old fool at that point and just lucked out by being >>> President of the biggest lobbying organization in the history of
Washington. Makes sense.
What I'm saying is that, if there's nothing to gain from torture, you're
left with merely the question of whether to cheer for it.
You won’t know if there’s nothing to gain from torture until you try.
On 2024-04-26 08:30:43 +0000, Ubiquitous said:
super70s@super70s.invalid wrote:
I understand Jesse Watters started his (in)auspicious career doing
"ambushes" for Bill O'Reilly.
Your understanding is wrong.
Well bubba, he certainly DID do ambush interviews for O'Reilly at one
point, whether or not it was the beginning of his career at Fox News or
in broadcasting in general I don't care enough about the sneering worm
to look up.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 65:00:44 |
| Calls: | 6,712 |
| Files: | 12,244 |
| Messages: | 5,356,203 |