• Megyn Kelly Slams NOW After Women's Organization Throws Support Behind

    From Ubiquitous@21:1/5 to All on Tue Apr 2 04:30:42 2024
    XPost: alt.feminism

    Megyn Kelly slammed NOW (National Organization for Women) when the group
    threw its support behind “trans women in sports,” claiming there was “enough space” for biological women to share.

    The host of “The Megyn Kelly Show” podcast took to X on Monday and wrote,
    “Hey [National NOW] — you don’t stand for us, understand us, care about us or speak for us. Go F yourselves.”

    Kelly’s comments were in response to a post from NOW – that claims to speak
    for women – in which the group blasted an Associated Press article about how more than a dozen “College swimmers, volleyball players” were suing “NCAA
    over transgender policies” and violating their Title IX rights.

    “Repeat after us: Weaponizing womenhood against other women is white supremacist patriarchy at work,” NOW’s post read.

    “Making people believe there isn’t enough space for trans women in sports is white supremacist patriarchy at work,” it added.

    Reading through the comments under the NOW post, a number of people made it clear they didn’t agree that trans-identifying male athletes should be
    allowed to compete against women in sports.

    “I can’t believe I worked here when I was in college. I’m embarrassed for
    you,” one person wrote. “The patriarchy is telling women to sit down and shut up and accept whatever unfairness and invasion of privacy is hurled their
    way.”

    Hey @NationalNOW – you don’t stand for us, understand us, care about
    us or speak for us. Go F yourselves. https://t.co/svQxqFmiEz

    — Megyn Kelly (@megynkelly) April 1, 2024

    Another added, “Repeat after me: Women are Adult Human Females. Men are Adult Human Males. There are only 2 sexes. This is reality.”

    While a third wrote, “No. I don’t repeat lies. Women’s sports were created to carve out space for women where there was none. And now you’re defending the infiltration of that space by men. ‘Making space’ for men means the space disappears. Repeat that.”

    In the lawsuit, the college girls state that the reason they joined the suit
    is “to secure for future generations of women the promise of Title IX that is being denied them and other college women” by the NCAA.

    The NCAA has since responded to the suit in a statement that read, “College sports are the premier stage for women’s sports in America, and while the
    NCAA does not comment on pending litigation, the Association and its members will continue to promote Title IX, make unprecedented investments in women’s sports and ensure fair competition in all NCAA championships.”

    --
    Let's go Brandon!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to Ubiquitous on Tue Apr 2 13:12:39 2024
    XPost: alt.feminism

    In article <uugpm0$35mli$3@dont-email.me>,
    Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:

    Megyn Kelly slammed NOW (National Organization for Women) when the group threw its support behind "trans women in sports", claiming there was "enough space" for biological women to share.

    The host of THE MEGYN KELLY SHOW podcast took to X on Monday and wrote,
    "Hey [National NOW]-- you don't stand for us, understand us, care about us
    or speak for us. Go F yourselves."

    Kelly's comments were in response to a post from NOW-- that claims to speak for women-- in which the group blasted an Associated Press article about how more than a dozen college swimmers, volleyball players were suing the NCAA over transgender policies and violating their Title IX rights.

    "Repeat after us: Weaponizing womenhood against other women is white supremacist patriarchy at work," NOW's post read.

    How how does objecting to troons competing against real women become
    "white supremacy" when both the troons and the real women involved are
    all different races?

    Is this another one of those deals where we just call anything we don't
    like "white supremacy" for dramatic effect?

    And how ridiculous is it to claim that women who object to men shutting
    them out from their own sports are "the patriarchy"?

    Reading through the comments under the NOW post...

    "I can't believe I worked here when I was in college. I'm embarrassed for you," one person wrote. "The patriarchy is telling women to sit down and shut up and accept whatever unfairness and invasion of privacy is hurled their way."

    Exactly.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rhino@21:1/5 to atropos@mac.com on Tue Apr 2 22:27:45 2024
    XPost: alt.feminism

    On Tue, 02 Apr 2024 13:12:39 -0700
    BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

    In article <uugpm0$35mli$3@dont-email.me>,
    Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:

    Megyn Kelly slammed NOW (National Organization for Women) when the
    group threw its support behind "trans women in sports", claiming
    there was "enough space" for biological women to share.

    The host of THE MEGYN KELLY SHOW podcast took to X on Monday and
    wrote, "Hey [National NOW]-- you don't stand for us, understand us,
    care about us or speak for us. Go F yourselves."

    Kelly's comments were in response to a post from NOW-- that claims
    to speak for women-- in which the group blasted an Associated Press
    article about how more than a dozen college swimmers, volleyball
    players were suing the NCAA over transgender policies and violating
    their Title IX rights.

    "Repeat after us: Weaponizing womenhood against other women is
    white supremacist patriarchy at work," NOW's post read.

    How how does objecting to troons competing against real women become
    "white supremacy" when both the troons and the real women involved
    are all different races?

    Is this another one of those deals where we just call anything we
    don't like "white supremacy" for dramatic effect?


    Yup. Just like the Marxists refer to any person, group or idea they
    dislike as "fascist".

    And how ridiculous is it to claim that women who object to men
    shutting them out from their own sports are "the patriarchy"?

    Reading through the comments under the NOW post...

    "I can't believe I worked here when I was in college. I'm
    embarrassed for you," one person wrote. "The patriarchy is telling
    women to sit down and shut up and accept whatever unfairness and
    invasion of privacy is hurled their way."

    Exactly.



    --
    Rhino

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Horny Goat@21:1/5 to All on Wed Apr 3 02:54:54 2024
    XPost: alt.feminism

    On Tue, 02 Apr 2024 04:30:42 -0400, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net>
    wrote:

    Megyn Kelly slammed NOW (National Organization for Women) when the group >threw its support behind “trans women in sports,” claiming there was “enough >space” for biological women to share.

    The host of “The Megyn Kelly Show” podcast took to X on Monday and wrote, >“Hey [National NOW] — you don’t stand for us, understand us, care about us or >speak for us. Go F yourselves.”

    Kelly’s comments were in response to a post from NOW – that claims to speak >for women – in which the group blasted an Associated Press article about how >more than a dozen “College swimmers, volleyball players” were suing “NCAA >over transgender policies” and violating their Title IX rights.

    “Repeat after us: Weaponizing womenhood against other women is white >supremacist patriarchy at work,” NOW’s post read.

    “Making people believe there isn’t enough space for trans women in sports is >white supremacist patriarchy at work,” it added.

    So all this is the fault of white men? Now THAT is a Grand Canyon
    quality leap!

    (Even if you took their view of trans women in sports to be correct)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Horny Goat@21:1/5 to atropos@mac.com on Wed Apr 3 02:57:26 2024
    XPost: alt.feminism

    On Tue, 02 Apr 2024 13:12:39 -0700, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

    How how does objecting to troons competing against real women become
    "white supremacy" when both the troons and the real women involved are
    all different races?

    You are mistaken. It's NOT white supremacy but 'white supremicist
    patriarchy' meaning white women are excluded from their accusations!

    Not the same thing at all. It wouldn't do for NOW to accuse any woman
    of wrongdoing after all...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From super70s@21:1/5 to Rhino on Wed Apr 3 05:13:48 2024
    XPost: alt.feminism

    On 2024-04-03 02:27:45 +0000, Rhino said:

    On Tue, 02 Apr 2024 13:12:39 -0700
    BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

    In article <uugpm0$35mli$3@dont-email.me>,
    Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:

    Megyn Kelly slammed NOW (National Organization for Women) when the
    group threw its support behind "trans women in sports", claiming
    there was "enough space" for biological women to share.

    Megyn Kelly, forever remembered with a handheld camera following her
    cute backside into the 2016 Fox News election results room.

    The host of THE MEGYN KELLY SHOW podcast took to X on Monday and
    wrote, "Hey [National NOW]-- you don't stand for us, understand us,
    care about us or speak for us. Go F yourselves."

    Kelly's comments were in response to a post from NOW-- that claims
    to speak for women-- in which the group blasted an Associated Press
    article about how more than a dozen college swimmers, volleyball
    players were suing the NCAA over transgender policies and violating
    their Title IX rights.

    "Repeat after us: Weaponizing womenhood against other women is
    white supremacist patriarchy at work," NOW's post read.

    How how does objecting to troons competing against real women become
    "white supremacy" when both the troons and the real women involved
    are all different races?

    Is this another one of those deals where we just call anything we
    don't like "white supremacy" for dramatic effect?


    Yup. Just like the Marxists refer to any person, group or idea they
    dislike as "fascist".

    <chortle> Talk about a self-contained statement of hypocrisy.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ubiquitous@21:1/5 to no_offline_contact@example.com on Wed Apr 3 14:02:54 2024
    XPost: alt.feminism

    no_offline_contact@example.com wrote:
    BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
    Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:

    Megyn Kelly slammed NOW (National Organization for Women) when the
    group threw its support behind "trans women in sports", claiming
    there was "enough space" for biological women to share.

    The host of THE MEGYN KELLY SHOW podcast took to X on Monday and
    wrote, "Hey [National NOW]-- you don't stand for us, understand us,
    care about us or speak for us. Go F yourselves."

    Kelly's comments were in response to a post from NOW-- that claims
    to speak for women-- in which the group blasted an Associated Press
    article about how more than a dozen college swimmers, volleyball
    players were suing the NCAA over transgender policies and violating
    their Title IX rights.

    "Repeat after us: Weaponizing womenhood against other women is
    white supremacist patriarchy at work," NOW's post read.

    How how does objecting to troons competing against real women become
    "white supremacy" when both the troons and the real women involved
    are all different races?

    Is this another one of those deals where we just call anything we
    don't like "white supremacy" for dramatic effect?

    Yup. Just like the Marxists refer to any person, group or idea they
    dislike as "fascist".

    Or "Nazi", neither of which terms they understand the meaning.

    --
    Let's go Brandon!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ubiquitous@21:1/5 to super70s@super70s.invalid on Wed Apr 3 14:05:13 2024
    XPost: alt.feminism

    In article <uuja4s$3rve3$1@dont-email.me>, super70s@super70s.invalid wrote:
    On 2024-04-03 02:27:45 +0000, Rhino said:
    On Tue, 02 Apr 2024 13:12:39 -0700
    BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
    Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:

    Megyn Kelly slammed NOW (National Organization for Women) when the
    group threw its support behind "trans women in sports", claiming
    there was "enough space" for biological women to share.

    Megyn Kelly, forever remembered with a handheld camera following her
    cute backside into the 2016 Fox News election results room.

    Adhominem noted. Get back to us when you have a real argument to make.

    The host of THE MEGYN KELLY SHOW podcast took to X on Monday and
    wrote, "Hey [National NOW]-- you don't stand for us, understand us,
    care about us or speak for us. Go F yourselves."

    Kelly's comments were in response to a post from NOW-- that claims
    to speak for women-- in which the group blasted an Associated Press
    article about how more than a dozen college swimmers, volleyball
    players were suing the NCAA over transgender policies and violating
    their Title IX rights.

    "Repeat after us: Weaponizing womenhood against other women is
    white supremacist patriarchy at work," NOW's post read.

    How how does objecting to troons competing against real women become
    "white supremacy" when both the troons and the real women involved
    are all different races?

    Is this another one of those deals where we just call anything we
    don't like "white supremacy" for dramatic effect?

    Yup. Just like the Marxists refer to any person, group or idea they
    dislike as "fascist".

    <chortle> Talk about a self-contained statement of hypocrisy.

    Projection noted. Get back to us when you have a real argument to make.

    --
    Let's go Brandon!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ubiquitous@21:1/5 to lcraver@home.ca on Wed Apr 3 14:06:54 2024
    XPost: alt.feminism

    lcraver@home.ca wrote:
    Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:

    Megyn Kelly slammed NOW (National Organization for Women) when the group >>threw its support behind “trans women in sports,” claiming there was >>“enough space” for biological women to share.

    The host of “The Megyn Kelly Show” podcast took to X on Monday and wrote, >>“Hey [National NOW] — you don’t stand for us, understand us, care about us >>or speak for us. Go F yourselves.”

    Kelly’s comments were in response to a post from NOW – that claims to speak >>for women – in which the group blasted an Associated Press article about >>how more than a dozen “College swimmers, volleyball players” were suing >>“NCAA over transgender policies” and violating their Title IX rights.

    “Repeat after us: Weaponizing womenhood against other women is white >>supremacist patriarchy at work,” NOW’s post read.

    “Making people believe there isn’t enough space for trans women in sports >>is white supremacist patriarchy at work,” it added.

    So all this is the fault of white men? Now THAT is a Grand Canyon
    quality leap!

    Aren't all these cross-dressing cheaters white men?

    --
    Let's go Brandon!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)