BLM protesters flooded Western Kentucky University today and surrounded the building where Kyle Rittenhouse was making an appearance.
The biggest question I have is: why is BLM mad at Kyle Rittenhouse?
The dude shot three white guys and has never said anything that can be construed as racist toward blacks.
Is it because he came to Wisconsin to defend businesses from looters? Is it now racist to stand in the way of a black mob when they want to take shit that
doesn't belong to them?
On 3/28/24 12:18 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
BLM protesters flooded Western Kentucky University today and surrounded
the building where Kyle Rittenhouse was making an appearance.
The biggest question I have is: why is BLM mad at Kyle Rittenhouse?
The dude shot three white guys and has never said anything that can be construed as racist toward blacks.
Is it because he came to Wisconsin to defend businesses from looters?
Is it now racist to stand in the way of a black mob when they want to
take shit that doesn't belong to them?
Because BLM ain't racist.
Because BLM ain't racist
Because BLM ain't racist like you.
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26:49 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
Because BLM ain't racist like you.
BLM isn't racist?
HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
On 3/28/2024 2:05 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26:49 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
Because BLM ain't racist like you.
BLM isn't racist?
HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
"Black lives matter" is not an inherently racist sentiment.
On 3/28/2024 2:05 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26:49 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
Because BLM ain't racist like you.
BLM isn't racist?
HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
"Black lives matter" is not an inherently racist sentiment.
On 3/28/2024 2:05 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26:49 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
Because BLM ain't racist like you.
BLM isn't racist?
HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
"Black lives matter" is not an inherently racist sentiment.
On Mar 28, 2024 at 12:47:48 PM PDT, "moviePig" <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 3/28/2024 2:05 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26:49 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
Because BLM ain't racist like you.
BLM isn't racist?
HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
"Black lives matter" is not an inherently racist sentiment.
But the people who run the organization are quite racist indeed.
On Mar 28, 2024 at 12:47:48 PM PDT, "moviePig" <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 3/28/2024 2:05 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26:49 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
Because BLM ain't racist like you.
BLM isn't racist?
HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
"Black lives matter" is not an inherently racist sentiment.
But the people who run the organization are quite racist indeed.
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 15:47:48 -0400
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 3/28/2024 2:05 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26:49 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
Because BLM ain't racist like you.
BLM isn't racist?
HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
"Black lives matter" is not an inherently racist sentiment.
Yes it is. I remember reading about a college president who dared to
say "All Lives Matter" when BLM was protesting about something and she
was soon forced to resign because the sentiment SHE expressed was NOT compatible with what BLM was insisting.
On 3/28/2024 4:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 28, 2024 at 12:47:48 PM PDT, "moviePig" <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 3/28/2024 2:05 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26:49 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
Because BLM ain't racist like you.
BLM isn't racist?
HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
"Black lives matter" is not an inherently racist sentiment.
But the people who run the organization are quite racist indeed.
Presumably, you mean that they believe blacks to be a superior race. I
don't think human nature works that way ...nor is that belief necessary
to the organization's stated aim.
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 3/28/2024 4:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 28, 2024 at 12:47:48 PM PDT, "moviePig" <never@nothere.com> wrote: >>>
On 3/28/2024 2:05 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26:49 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>
Because BLM ain't racist like you.
BLM isn't racist?
HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
"Black lives matter" is not an inherently racist sentiment.
But the people who run the organization are quite racist indeed.
Presumably, you mean that they believe blacks to be a superior race. I
don't think human nature works that way ...nor is that belief necessary
to the organization's stated aim.
Well, at least we agree that all the claims of "white supremacy that we constantly hear about from progs are bullshit.
On 3/28/24 12:18 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
BLM protesters flooded Western Kentucky University today and surrounded the >> building where Kyle Rittenhouse was making an appearance.
The biggest question I have is: why is BLM mad at Kyle Rittenhouse?
The dude shot three white guys and has never said anything that can be
construed as racist toward blacks.
Is it because he came to Wisconsin to defend businesses from looters? Is it >> now racist to stand in the way of a black mob when they want to take shit that
doesn't belong to them?
Because BLM ain't racist like you.
On 3/28/2024 2:05 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26:49 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
Because BLM ain't racist like you.
BLM isn't racist?
HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
"Black lives matter" is not an inherently racist sentiment.
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26:49 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/28/24 12:18 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
BLM protesters flooded Western Kentucky University today and surrounded the >>> building where Kyle Rittenhouse was making an appearance.
The biggest question I have is: why is BLM mad at Kyle Rittenhouse?
The dude shot three white guys and has never said anything that can be
construed as racist toward blacks.
Is it because he came to Wisconsin to defend businesses from looters? Is it >>> now racist to stand in the way of a black mob when they want to take shit that
doesn't belong to them?
Because BLM ain't racist like you.
That's the funniest thing I'll read all day (but not because of why
you think it is).
In article <uu3un9$3kj1o$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 3/28/24 12:18 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
BLM protesters flooded Western Kentucky University today and surroundedBecause BLM ain't racist.
the building where Kyle Rittenhouse was making an appearance.
The biggest question I have is: why is BLM mad at Kyle Rittenhouse?
The dude shot three white guys and has never said anything that can be
construed as racist toward blacks.
Is it because he came to Wisconsin to defend businesses from looters?
Is it now racist to stand in the way of a black mob when they want to
take shit that doesn't belong to them?
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
And who says dour leftists have no sense of humor?
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26:49 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
Because BLM ain't racist like you.
BLM isn't racist?
HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
On 3/28/24 2:04 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <uu3un9$3kj1o$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 3/28/24 12:18 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
BLM protesters flooded Western Kentucky University today and surrounded >>> the building where Kyle Rittenhouse was making an appearance.Because BLM ain't racist.
The biggest question I have is: why is BLM mad at Kyle Rittenhouse?
The dude shot three white guys and has never said anything that can be >>> construed as racist toward blacks.
Is it because he came to Wisconsin to defend businesses from looters?
Is it now racist to stand in the way of a black mob when they want to
take shit that doesn't belong to them?
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
And who says dour leftists have no sense of humor?
Usually you. Guess you're wrong again.
On 3/28/24 6:06 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 3/28/2024 4:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 28, 2024 at 12:47:48 PM PDT, "moviePig" <never@nothere.com> wrote: >>>
On 3/28/2024 2:05 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26:49 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>
Because BLM ain't racist like you.
BLM isn't racist?
HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
"Black lives matter" is not an inherently racist sentiment.
But the people who run the organization are quite racist indeed.
Presumably, you mean that they believe blacks to be a superior race. I
don't think human nature works that way ...nor is that belief necessary
to the organization's stated aim.
Well, at least we agree that all the claims of "white supremacy" that we constantly hear about from progs are bullshit.
Scott followed up to say that the definition of a white nationalist is someone believing "the white race is superior to all other races"
and asked, "Do you believe that white nationalists are racist?"
In article <uu6ij9$b577$7@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 3/28/24 6:06 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 3/28/2024 4:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 28, 2024 at 12:47:48 PM PDT, "moviePig" <never@nothere.com> wrote: >>>>>
On 3/28/2024 2:05 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26:49 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>
Because BLM ain't racist like you.
BLM isn't racist?
HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
"Black lives matter" is not an inherently racist sentiment.
But the people who run the organization are quite racist indeed.
Presumably, you mean that they believe blacks to be a superior race. I >>>> don't think human nature works that way ...nor is that belief necessary >>>> to the organization's stated aim.
Well, at least we agree that all the claims of "white supremacy" that we >>> constantly hear about from progs are bullshit.
Scott followed up to say that the definition of a white nationalist is
someone believing "the white race is superior to all other races"
(1) Mind your attributions, Shit-Shoes. I didn't say what your quote
levels claim I did.
(2) That's not the definition of a white nationalist.
A nationalist is someone who believes in the policy or doctrine of
asserting or giving primacy to the interests of one's own nation viewed
as separate from the interests of other nations or the international community.
A white nationalist is someone who believes all that and is white.
and asked, "Do you believe that white nationalists are racist?"
The answer would be-- like most groups of people-- some are and most
aren't.
Just as black nationalists, taken as a whole, would count a few racists
among their group while most are just people advocating that the
interests of their own country should be the priority.
On Mar 28, 2024 at 12:47:48 PM PDT, "moviePig" <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 3/28/2024 2:05 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26:49 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
Because BLM ain't racist like you.
BLM isn't racist?
HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
"Black lives matter" is not an inherently racist sentiment.
But the people who run the organization are quite racist indeed.
On 3/28/2024 2:05 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26:49 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
Because BLM ain't racist like you.
BLM isn't racist?
HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
"Black lives matter" is not an inherently racist sentiment.
Because BLM ain't racist like you.
That's the funniest thing I'll read all day (but not because of why
you think it is).
On 3/29/2024 2:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <uu6ij9$b577$7@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 3/28/24 6:06 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 3/28/2024 4:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 28, 2024 at 12:47:48 PM PDT, "moviePig" <never@nothere.com> >>>>> wrote:
On 3/28/2024 2:05 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26:49 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>
Because BLM ain't racist like you.
BLM isn't racist?
HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
"Black lives matter" is not an inherently racist sentiment.
But the people who run the organization are quite racist indeed.
Presumably, you mean that they believe blacks to be a superior race. I >>>> don't think human nature works that way ...nor is that belief necessary >>>> to the organization's stated aim.
Well, at least we agree that all the claims of "white supremacy" that we >>> constantly hear about from progs are bullshit.
Scott followed up to say that the definition of a white nationalist is >>> someone believing "the white race is superior to all other races"
(1) Mind your attributions, Shit-Shoes. I didn't say what your quote
levels claim I did.
(2) That's not the definition of a white nationalist.
A nationalist is someone who believes in the policy or doctrine of asserting or giving primacy to the interests of one's own nation viewed
as separate from the interests of other nations or the international community.
A white nationalist is someone who believes all that and is white.
and asked, "Do you believe that white nationalists are racist?"
The answer would be-- like most groups of people-- some are and most aren't.
Just as black nationalists, taken as a whole, would count a few racists among their group while most are just people advocating that the
interests of their own country should be the priority.
What, then, shall we call someone who advocates for a "white nation"?
On 3/29/2024 2:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <uu6ij9$b577$7@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 3/28/24 6:06 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 3/28/2024 4:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 28, 2024 at 12:47:48 PM PDT, "moviePig" <never@nothere.com> >>>>> wrote:
On 3/28/2024 2:05 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26:49 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>
Because BLM ain't racist like you.
BLM isn't racist?
HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
"Black lives matter" is not an inherently racist sentiment.
But the people who run the organization are quite racist indeed.
Presumably, you mean that they believe blacks to be a superior race. I >>>> don't think human nature works that way ...nor is that belief necessary >>>> to the organization's stated aim.
Well, at least we agree that all the claims of "white supremacy" that we >>> constantly hear about from progs are bullshit.
Scott followed up to say that the definition of a white nationalist is >>> someone believing "the white race is superior to all other races"
(1) Mind your attributions, Shit-Shoes. I didn't say what your quote
levels claim I did.
(2) That's not the definition of a white nationalist.
A nationalist is someone who believes in the policy or doctrine of asserting or giving primacy to the interests of one's own nation viewed
as separate from the interests of other nations or the international community.
A white nationalist is someone who believes all that and is white.
and asked, "Do you believe that white nationalists are racist?"
The answer would be-- like most groups of people-- some are and most aren't.
Just as black nationalists, taken as a whole, would count a few racists among their group while most are just people advocating that the
interests of their own country should be the priority.
What, then, shall we call someone who advocates for a "white nation"?
On 3/29/2024 2:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <uu6ij9$b577$7@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 3/28/24 6:06 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 3/28/2024 4:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 28, 2024 at 12:47:48 PM PDT, "moviePig" <never@nothere.com> >>>>>> wrote:
On 3/28/2024 2:05 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26:49 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
Because BLM ain't racist like you.
BLM isn't racist?
HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
"Black lives matter" is not an inherently racist sentiment.
But the people who run the organization are quite racist indeed.
Presumably, you mean that they believe blacks to be a superior race. I >>>>> don't think human nature works that way ...nor is that belief
necessary
to the organization's stated aim.
Well, at least we agree that all the claims of "white supremacy"
that we
constantly hear about from progs are bullshit.
Scott followed up to say that the definition of a white nationalist is >>>> someone believing "the white race is superior to all other races"
(1) Mind your attributions, Shit-Shoes. I didn't say what your quote
levels claim I did.
(2) That's not the definition of a white nationalist.
A nationalist is someone who believes in the policy or doctrine of
asserting or giving primacy to the interests of one's own nation viewed
as separate from the interests of other nations or the international
community.
A white nationalist is someone who believes all that and is white.
and asked, "Do you believe that white nationalists are racist?"
The answer would be-- like most groups of people-- some are and most
aren't.
Just as black nationalists, taken as a whole, would count a few racists
among their group while most are just people advocating that the
interests of their own country should be the priority.
What, then, shall we call someone who advocates for a "white nation"?
In article
<17c15538b804c570$26844$2601257$cad58068@news.newsdemon.com>,
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 3/29/2024 2:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <uu6ij9$b577$7@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 3/28/24 6:06 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 3/28/2024 4:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 28, 2024 at 12:47:48 PM PDT, "moviePig" <never@nothere.com> >>>>>>> wrote:
On 3/28/2024 2:05 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26:49 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>
Because BLM ain't racist like you.
BLM isn't racist?
HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
"Black lives matter" is not an inherently racist sentiment.
But the people who run the organization are quite racist indeed.
Presumably, you mean that they believe blacks to be a superior race. I >>>>>> don't think human nature works that way ...nor is that belief necessary >>>>>> to the organization's stated aim.
Well, at least we agree that all the claims of "white supremacy" that we >>>>> constantly hear about from progs are bullshit.
Scott followed up to say that the definition of a white nationalist is >>>>> someone believing "the white race is superior to all other races"
(1) Mind your attributions, Shit-Shoes. I didn't say what your quote
levels claim I did.
(2) That's not the definition of a white nationalist.
A nationalist is someone who believes in the policy or doctrine of
asserting or giving primacy to the interests of one's own nation viewed
as separate from the interests of other nations or the international
community.
A white nationalist is someone who believes all that and is white.
and asked, "Do you believe that white nationalists are racist?"
The answer would be-- like most groups of people-- some are and most
aren't.
Just as black nationalists, taken as a whole, would count a few racists
among their group while most are just people advocating that the
interests of their own country should be the priority.
What, then, shall we call someone who advocates for a "white nation"?
Are we expected to answer every question you post in triplicate?
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 20:44:13 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
On Mar 28, 2024 at 12:47:48 PM PDT, "moviePig" <never@nothere.com> wrote:Which was the whole point I was trying to make - and apparently my
On 3/28/2024 2:05 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26:49 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>
Because BLM ain't racist like you.
BLM isn't racist?
HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
"Black lives matter" is not an inherently racist sentiment.
But the people who run the organization are quite racist indeed.
attempt to be sensitive wasn't respected.
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 15:47:48 -0400, moviePig <never@nothere.com>
wrote:
On 3/28/2024 2:05 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:Never said it was. Nor did I say BLM urged their people to loot and
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26:49 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
Because BLM ain't racist like you.
BLM isn't racist?
HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
"Black lives matter" is not an inherently racist sentiment.
pillage stores and other buildings - but equally there is no doubt
that many of the "mostly peaceful protesters" did exactly that. And
cited real or imagined grievances as justification for their looting.
If you look at the speeches of BLM leaders they're fairly hardcore
towards anybody who isn't black - and the claim that ONLY whites can
be racist is pure bollocks - no matter your color, if you're treating
people differently by reason of ethnicity, yeah that's racist. All of
us to one extent or another but 90+% of people keep it well checked
and actually DO try to do better.
Which is why I have no time for the 'grievance' types who would rename everything and demolish statues and other meorials. I am particularly appalled by what's going on in London since October 7th particularly
with war memorials and statues. (Though I personally tend to feel a
lot of the "Confederate herore" memorials should have come down
decades ago) Because the bottom line is having laws is fine but what's
in peoples' hearts is more important and peoples' attitudes do change
over time once they realize the effects of attitudes on actions.
On 3/29/2024 4:12 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 15:47:48 -0400, moviePig <never@nothere.com>
wrote:
On 3/28/2024 2:05 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:Never said it was. Nor did I say BLM urged their people to loot and
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26:49 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
Because BLM ain't racist like you.
BLM isn't racist?
HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
"Black lives matter" is not an inherently racist sentiment.
pillage stores and other buildings - but equally there is no doubt
that many of the "mostly peaceful protesters" did exactly that. And
cited real or imagined grievances as justification for their looting.
If you look at the speeches of BLM leaders they're fairly hardcore
towards anybody who isn't black - and the claim that ONLY whites can
be racist is pure bollocks - no matter your color, if you're treating people differently by reason of ethnicity, yeah that's racist. All of
us to one extent or another but 90+% of people keep it well checked
and actually DO try to do better.
Which is why I have no time for the 'grievance' types who would rename everything and demolish statues and other meorials. I am particularly appalled by what's going on in London since October 7th particularly
with war memorials and statues. (Though I personally tend to feel a
lot of the "Confederate herore" memorials should have come down
decades ago) Because the bottom line is having laws is fine but what's
in peoples' hearts is more important and peoples' attitudes do change
over time once they realize the effects of attitudes on actions.
Then that'd make, e.g., busing and affirmative action "racist".
In article
<17c15b50736ea91f$14175$2820980$c4d58e68@news.newsdemon.com>,
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 3/29/2024 4:12 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 15:47:48 -0400, moviePig <never@nothere.com>
wrote:
On 3/28/2024 2:05 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:Never said it was. Nor did I say BLM urged their people to loot and
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26:49 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>
Because BLM ain't racist like you.
BLM isn't racist?
HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
"Black lives matter" is not an inherently racist sentiment.
pillage stores and other buildings - but equally there is no doubt
that many of the "mostly peaceful protesters" did exactly that. And
cited real or imagined grievances as justification for their looting.
If you look at the speeches of BLM leaders they're fairly hardcore
towards anybody who isn't black - and the claim that ONLY whites can
be racist is pure bollocks - no matter your color, if you're treating
people differently by reason of ethnicity, yeah that's racist. All of
us to one extent or another but 90+% of people keep it well checked
and actually DO try to do better.
Which is why I have no time for the 'grievance' types who would rename
everything and demolish statues and other meorials. I am particularly
appalled by what's going on in London since October 7th particularly
with war memorials and statues. (Though I personally tend to feel a
lot of the "Confederate herore" memorials should have come down
decades ago) Because the bottom line is having laws is fine but what's
in peoples' hearts is more important and peoples' attitudes do change
over time once they realize the effects of attitudes on actions.
Then that'd make, e.g., busing and affirmative action "racist".
Now you're getting it!
On 3/28/24 1:04 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <uu3un9$3kj1o$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 3/28/24 12:18 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
BLM protesters flooded Western Kentucky University today and surrounded >>>> the building where Kyle Rittenhouse was making an appearance.Because BLM ain't racist.
The biggest question I have is: why is BLM mad at Kyle Rittenhouse?
The dude shot three white guys and has never said anything that can be >>>> construed as racist toward blacks.
Is it because he came to Wisconsin to defend businesses from looters?
Is it now racist to stand in the way of a black mob when they want to
take shit that doesn't belong to them?
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
And who says dour leftists have no sense of humor?
Wait, so you're claim is because you're a white supremacist to say
"black lives matter" is racist? Do you have ANY IDEA how stupid this
makes you look?
On 3/29/24 6:34 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26:49 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/28/24 12:18 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
BLM protesters flooded Western Kentucky University today and surrounded the
building where Kyle Rittenhouse was making an appearance.
The biggest question I have is: why is BLM mad at Kyle Rittenhouse?
The dude shot three white guys and has never said anything that can be >>>> construed as racist toward blacks.
Is it because he came to Wisconsin to defend businesses from looters? Is it
now racist to stand in the way of a black mob when they want to take shit that
doesn't belong to them?
Because BLM ain't racist like you.
That's the funniest thing I'll read all day (but not because of why
you think it is).
Since when is 6:34 am "all day?" Was it the stupidity talking again?
In article
<17c1554881e6f860$47316$3081049$52d51861@news.newsdemon.com>,
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 3/29/2024 2:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <uu6ij9$b577$7@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 3/28/24 6:06 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 3/28/2024 4:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 28, 2024 at 12:47:48 PM PDT, "moviePig" <never@nothere.com>
wrote:
On 3/28/2024 2:05 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26:49 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>>>>>
Because BLM ain't racist like you.
BLM isn't racist?
HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
"Black lives matter" is not an inherently racist sentiment.
But the people who run the organization are quite racist indeed.
Presumably, you mean that they believe blacks to be a superior race. I >> >>>> don't think human nature works that way ...nor is that belief necessary >> >>>> to the organization's stated aim.
Well, at least we agree that all the claims of "white supremacy" that we >> >>> constantly hear about from progs are bullshit.
Scott followed up to say that the definition of a white nationalist is >> >>> someone believing "the white race is superior to all other races"
(1) Mind your attributions, Shit-Shoes. I didn't say what your quote
levels claim I did.
(2) That's not the definition of a white nationalist.
A nationalist is someone who believes in the policy or doctrine of
asserting or giving primacy to the interests of one's own nation viewed
as separate from the interests of other nations or the international
community.
A white nationalist is someone who believes all that and is white.
and asked, "Do you believe that white nationalists are racist?"
The answer would be-- like most groups of people-- some are and most
aren't.
Just as black nationalists, taken as a whole, would count a few racists
among their group while most are just people advocating that the
interests of their own country should be the priority.
What, then, shall we call someone who advocates for a "white nation"?
The same thing we call someone who praises "the browning of America": a >racist.
On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 13:33:36 -0700, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
In article
<17c1554881e6f860$47316$3081049$52d51861@news.newsdemon.com>,
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 3/29/2024 2:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <uu6ij9$b577$7@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 3/28/24 6:06 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 3/28/2024 4:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 28, 2024 at 12:47:48 PM PDT, "moviePig" <never@nothere.com> >>>>>>>> wrote:Presumably, you mean that they believe blacks to be a superior race. I >>>>>>> don't think human nature works that way ...nor is that belief necessary >>>>>>> to the organization's stated aim.
On 3/28/2024 2:05 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26:49 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>
Because BLM ain't racist like you.
BLM isn't racist?
HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
"Black lives matter" is not an inherently racist sentiment.
But the people who run the organization are quite racist indeed. >>>>>>>
Well, at least we agree that all the claims of "white supremacy" that we >>>>>> constantly hear about from progs are bullshit.
Scott followed up to say that the definition of a white nationalist is >>>>>> someone believing "the white race is superior to all other races"
(1) Mind your attributions, Shit-Shoes. I didn't say what your quote
levels claim I did.
(2) That's not the definition of a white nationalist.
A nationalist is someone who believes in the policy or doctrine of
asserting or giving primacy to the interests of one's own nation viewed >>>> as separate from the interests of other nations or the international
community.
A white nationalist is someone who believes all that and is white.
and asked, "Do you believe that white nationalists are racist?"
The answer would be-- like most groups of people-- some are and most
aren't.
Just as black nationalists, taken as a whole, would count a few racists >>>> among their group while most are just people advocating that the
interests of their own country should be the priority.
What, then, shall we call someone who advocates for a "white nation"?
The same thing we call someone who praises "the browning of America": a
racist.
Don't look for any honesty out him. It would be earth shattering if
he were.
On 3/30/2024 10:32 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 13:33:36 -0700, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
In article
<17c1554881e6f860$47316$3081049$52d51861@news.newsdemon.com>,
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 3/29/2024 2:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <uu6ij9$b577$7@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 3/28/24 6:06 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 3/28/2024 4:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 28, 2024 at 12:47:48 PM PDT, "moviePig" <never@nothere.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote:Presumably, you mean that they believe blacks to be a superior >>>>>>>> race. I
On 3/28/2024 2:05 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:But the people who run the organization are quite racist indeed. >>>>>>>>
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26:49 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
Because BLM ain't racist like you.
BLM isn't racist?
HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
"Black lives matter" is not an inherently racist sentiment. >>>>>>>>>
don't think human nature works that way ...nor is that belief
necessary
to the organization's stated aim.
Well, at least we agree that all the claims of "white supremacy" >>>>>>> that we
constantly hear about from progs are bullshit.
Scott followed up to say that the definition of a white
nationalist is
someone believing "the white race is superior to all other races"
(1) Mind your attributions, Shit-Shoes. I didn't say what your quote >>>>> levels claim I did.
(2) That's not the definition of a white nationalist.
A nationalist is someone who believes in the policy or doctrine of
asserting or giving primacy to the interests of one's own nation
viewed
as separate from the interests of other nations or the international >>>>> community.
A white nationalist is someone who believes all that and is white.
and asked, "Do you believe that white nationalists are racist?"
The answer would be-- like most groups of people-- some are and most >>>>> aren't.
Just as black nationalists, taken as a whole, would count a few
racists
among their group while most are just people advocating that the
interests of their own country should be the priority.
What, then, shall we call someone who advocates for a "white nation"?
The same thing we call someone who praises "the browning of America": a
racist.
Don't look for any honesty out him. It would be earth shattering if
he were.
Do you (honestly) think BTR answered the question (honestly)?
On 3/30/2024 10:32 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 13:33:36 -0700, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
In article
<17c1554881e6f860$47316$3081049$52d51861@news.newsdemon.com>,
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
What, then, shall we call someone who advocates for a "white nation"?
The same thing we call someone who praises "the browning of America": a
racist.
Don't look for any honesty out him. It would be earth shattering if
he were.
Do you (honestly) think BTR answered the question (honestly)?
In article
<17c195517c0b87ac$48982$3384359$c2d58868@news.newsdemon.com>,
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 3/30/2024 10:32 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 13:33:36 -0700, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
In article
<17c1554881e6f860$47316$3081049$52d51861@news.newsdemon.com>,
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
What, then, shall we call someone who advocates for a "white nation"? >>>>The same thing we call someone who praises "the browning of America": a >>>> racist.
Don't look for any honesty out him. It would be earth shattering if
he were.
Do you (honestly) think BTR answered the question (honestly)?
Holy shit. I actually gave you the answer you were looking for and
that's not even good enough.
On 3/30/2024 4:55 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article
<17c195517c0b87ac$48982$3384359$c2d58868@news.newsdemon.com>,
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 3/30/2024 10:32 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 13:33:36 -0700, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
In article
<17c1554881e6f860$47316$3081049$52d51861@news.newsdemon.com>,
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
What, then, shall we call someone who advocates for a "white nation"? >>>>The same thing we call someone who praises "the browning of America": a >>>> racist.
Don't look for any honesty out him. It would be earth shattering if
he were.
Do you (honestly) think BTR answered the question (honestly)?
Holy shit. I actually gave you the answer you were looking for and
that's not even good enough.
The answer I was looking for was "white nationalist". Well, 'looking
for', I dunno...
Wait, so you're claim is because you're a white supremacist to say
"black lives matter" is racist? Do you have ANY IDEA how stupid this
makes you look?
"you're claim"? Do you have ANY IDEA how stupid this makes you look?
What, then, shall we call someone who advocates for a "white nation"?
The same thing we call someone who praises "the browning of America": a >racist.
On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 13:33:36 -0700, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
What, then, shall we call someone who advocates for a "white nation"?
The same thing we call someone who praises "the browning of America": a
racist.
Agreed - though MOST BLM supporters would claim that anyone from an 'oppressed group' CAN'T be racist since they don't have the power to discriminate.
Which is of course a complete crock as most of us know.
ALL of us COULD be racist - most of us try very hard not to be.
Imagine that!
On 4/2/2024 3:50 AM, The Horny Goat wrote:
On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 13:33:36 -0700, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
What, then, shall we call someone who advocates for a "white nation"?
The same thing we call someone who praises "the browning of America": a
racist.
Agreed - though MOST BLM supporters would claim that anyone from an 'oppressed group' CAN'T be racist since they don't have the power to discriminate.
Which is of course a complete crock as most of us know.
ALL of us COULD be racist - most of us try very hard not to be.
Imagine that!
If a society inherits a racist component, as ours has, what measures can address it that can't be (mis)labeled 'racist' by those so inclined?
In article
<17c2979931d751bb$80145$2218499$46d50c60@news.newsdemon.com>,
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 4/2/2024 3:50 AM, The Horny Goat wrote:
On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 13:33:36 -0700, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
What, then, shall we call someone who advocates for a "white nation"? >>>>The same thing we call someone who praises "the browning of America": a >>>> racist.
Agreed - though MOST BLM supporters would claim that anyone from an
'oppressed group' CAN'T be racist since they don't have the power to
discriminate.
Which is of course a complete crock as most of us know.
ALL of us COULD be racist - most of us try very hard not to be.
Imagine that!
If a society inherits a racist component, as ours has, what measures can
address it that can't be (mis)labeled 'racist' by those so inclined?
Your question rests on a false premise with your use of the word 'mislabeled'.
If a society inherits a racist component, as ours has, what measures can >>> address it that can't be (mis)labeled 'racist' by those so inclined?
Your question rests on a false premise with your use of the word
'mislabeled'.
Your best response is to cavil at my parenthetical editorializing?
On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 22:17:03 -0400, moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
If despite the racial progress made both legally and in every otherIf a society inherits a racist component, as ours has, what measures can >>>> address it that can't be (mis)labeled 'racist' by those so inclined?
Your question rests on a false premise with your use of the word
'mislabeled'.
Your best response is to cavil at my parenthetical editorializing?
way is STILL considered racist (and the BLM people DO demonize MLK for advocating equality of opportunity rather than equality of results)
then why persist with legal equality?
Obviously that's a rhetorical question but my point is that the BLM +
company definition of "justice" and "equality" (which is the same as
the DEI definition which is 'equality of results" not opportunity) is positively obscene.
Go back and re-read the ENTIRE "I have a dream" speech and don't just
pay attention to the last minute of it (which is all most of us
remember). If you pay attention to the first half of the speech you'll
see King rips several states quite hard for racism before he gets to
the part about his children that we all remember.
https://www.npr.org/2010/01/18/122701268/i-have-a-dream-speech-in-its-entirety
For my money the first half is at least as important as his inspiring
finale.
On 4/3/2024 5:36 AM, The Horny Goat wrote:
On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 22:17:03 -0400, moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
If despite the racial progress made both legally and in every otherIf a society inherits a racist component, as ours has, what measures can >>>>> address it that can't be (mis)labeled 'racist' by those so inclined?
Your question rests on a false premise with your use of the word
'mislabeled'.
Your best response is to cavil at my parenthetical editorializing?
way is STILL considered racist (and the BLM people DO demonize MLK for
advocating equality of opportunity rather than equality of results)
then why persist with legal equality?
Obviously that's a rhetorical question but my point is that the BLM +
company definition of "justice" and "equality" (which is the same as
the DEI definition which is 'equality of results" not opportunity) is
positively obscene.
Go back and re-read the ENTIRE "I have a dream" speech and don't just
pay attention to the last minute of it (which is all most of us
remember). If you pay attention to the first half of the speech you'll
see King rips several states quite hard for racism before he gets to
the part about his children that we all remember.
https://www.npr.org/2010/01/18/122701268/i-have-a-dream-speech-in-its-entirety
For my money the first half is at least as important as his inspiring
finale.
The rub occurs when "racist" measures are needed to hasten the advent of equal opportunity. E.g., for blacks to be accepted as doctors, a few
have to be coerced into (also coerced) medical schools.
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 4/3/2024 5:36 AM, The Horny Goat wrote:
On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 22:17:03 -0400, moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
If despite the racial progress made both legally and in every otherIf a society inherits a racist component, as ours has, what measures can >>>>>> address it that can't be (mis)labeled 'racist' by those so inclined? >>>>>Your question rests on a false premise with your use of the word
'mislabeled'.
Your best response is to cavil at my parenthetical editorializing?
way is STILL considered racist (and the BLM people DO demonize MLK for
advocating equality of opportunity rather than equality of results)
then why persist with legal equality?
Obviously that's a rhetorical question but my point is that the BLM +
company definition of "justice" and "equality" (which is the same as
the DEI definition which is 'equality of results" not opportunity) is
positively obscene.
Go back and re-read the ENTIRE "I have a dream" speech and don't just
pay attention to the last minute of it (which is all most of us
remember). If you pay attention to the first half of the speech you'll
see King rips several states quite hard for racism before he gets to
the part about his children that we all remember.
https://www.npr.org/2010/01/18/122701268/i-have-a-dream-speech-in-its-entirety
For my money the first half is at least as important as his inspiring
finale.
The rub occurs when "racist" measures are needed to hasten the advent of
equal opportunity. E.g., for blacks to be accepted as doctors, a few
have to be coerced into (also coerced) medical schools.
"It's okay when we're racist because our hearts are with the angels!"
On 4/3/2024 5:25 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 4/3/2024 5:36 AM, The Horny Goat wrote:
On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 22:17:03 -0400, moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote: >>>>
If despite the racial progress made both legally and in every otherIf a society inherits a racist component, as ours has, what measures canYour question rests on a false premise with your use of the word
address it that can't be (mis)labeled 'racist' by those so inclined? >>>>>>
'mislabeled'.
Your best response is to cavil at my parenthetical editorializing?
way is STILL considered racist (and the BLM people DO demonize MLK for >>>> advocating equality of opportunity rather than equality of results)
then why persist with legal equality?
Obviously that's a rhetorical question but my point is that the BLM +
company definition of "justice" and "equality" (which is the same as
the DEI definition which is 'equality of results" not opportunity) is
positively obscene.
Go back and re-read the ENTIRE "I have a dream" speech and don't just
pay attention to the last minute of it (which is all most of us
remember). If you pay attention to the first half of the speech you'll >>>> see King rips several states quite hard for racism before he gets to
the part about his children that we all remember.
https://www.npr.org/2010/01/18/122701268/i-have-a-dream-speech-in-its-entirety
For my money the first half is at least as important as his inspiring
finale.
The rub occurs when "racist" measures are needed to hasten the advent of >>> equal opportunity. E.g., for blacks to be accepted as doctors, a few
have to be coerced into (also coerced) medical schools.
"It's okay when we're racist because our hearts are with the angels!"
Still waiting for something besides your dodge of the question up top...
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 4/3/2024 5:25 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 4/3/2024 5:36 AM, The Horny Goat wrote:
On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 22:17:03 -0400, moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote: >>>>>
If despite the racial progress made both legally and in every otherIf a society inherits a racist component, as ours has, what measures canYour question rests on a false premise with your use of the word >>>>>>> 'mislabeled'.
address it that can't be (mis)labeled 'racist' by those so inclined? >>>>>>>
Your best response is to cavil at my parenthetical editorializing? >>>>>>
way is STILL considered racist (and the BLM people DO demonize MLK for >>>>> advocating equality of opportunity rather than equality of results)
then why persist with legal equality?
Obviously that's a rhetorical question but my point is that the BLM + >>>>> company definition of "justice" and "equality" (which is the same as >>>>> the DEI definition which is 'equality of results" not opportunity) is >>>>> positively obscene.
Go back and re-read the ENTIRE "I have a dream" speech and don't just >>>>> pay attention to the last minute of it (which is all most of us
remember). If you pay attention to the first half of the speech you'll >>>>> see King rips several states quite hard for racism before he gets to >>>>> the part about his children that we all remember.
https://www.npr.org/2010/01/18/122701268/i-have-a-dream-speech-in-its-entirety
For my money the first half is at least as important as his inspiring >>>>> finale.
The rub occurs when "racist" measures are needed to hasten the advent of >>>> equal opportunity. E.g., for blacks to be accepted as doctors, a few
have to be coerced into (also coerced) medical schools.
"It's okay when we're racist because our hearts are with the angels!"
Still waiting for something besides your dodge of the question up top...
I don't see a question mark anywhere in your previous post.
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 4/3/2024 5:25 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 4/3/2024 5:36 AM, The Horny Goat wrote:
On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 22:17:03 -0400, moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote: >>>>>
If despite the racial progress made both legally and in every otherIf a society inherits a racist component, as ours has, what measures canYour question rests on a false premise with your use of the word >>>>>>> 'mislabeled'.
address it that can't be (mis)labeled 'racist' by those so inclined? >>>>>>>
Your best response is to cavil at my parenthetical editorializing? >>>>>>
way is STILL considered racist (and the BLM people DO demonize MLK for >>>>> advocating equality of opportunity rather than equality of results)
then why persist with legal equality?
Obviously that's a rhetorical question but my point is that the BLM + >>>>> company definition of "justice" and "equality" (which is the same as >>>>> the DEI definition which is 'equality of results" not opportunity) is >>>>> positively obscene.
Go back and re-read the ENTIRE "I have a dream" speech and don't just >>>>> pay attention to the last minute of it (which is all most of us
remember). If you pay attention to the first half of the speech you'll >>>>> see King rips several states quite hard for racism before he gets to >>>>> the part about his children that we all remember.
https://www.npr.org/2010/01/18/122701268/i-have-a-dream-speech-in-its-entirety
For my money the first half is at least as important as his inspiring >>>>> finale.
The rub occurs when "racist" measures are needed to hasten the advent of >>>> equal opportunity. E.g., for blacks to be accepted as doctors, a few
have to be coerced into (also coerced) medical schools.
"It's okay when we're racist because our hearts are with the angels!"
Still waiting for something besides your dodge of the question up top...
I don't see a question mark anywhere in your previous post.
On 4/3/2024 7:30 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 4/3/2024 5:25 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 4/3/2024 5:36 AM, The Horny Goat wrote:
On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 22:17:03 -0400, moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote: >>>>>
If despite the racial progress made both legally and in every other >>>>> way is STILL considered racist (and the BLM people DO demonize MLK for >>>>> advocating equality of opportunity rather than equality of results) >>>>> then why persist with legal equality?If a society inherits a racist component, as ours has, what measures >>>>>>>> canYour question rests on a false premise with your use of the word >>>>>>> 'mislabeled'.
address it that can't be (mis)labeled 'racist' by those so inclined? >>>>>>>
Your best response is to cavil at my parenthetical editorializing? >>>>>>
Obviously that's a rhetorical question but my point is that the BLM + >>>>> company definition of "justice" and "equality" (which is the same as >>>>> the DEI definition which is 'equality of results" not opportunity) is >>>>> positively obscene.
Go back and re-read the ENTIRE "I have a dream" speech and don't just >>>>> pay attention to the last minute of it (which is all most of us
remember). If you pay attention to the first half of the speech you'll >>>>> see King rips several states quite hard for racism before he gets to >>>>> the part about his children that we all remember.
https://www.npr.org/2010/01/18/122701268/i-have-a-dream-speech-in-its-en
tirety
For my money the first half is at least as important as his inspiring >>>>> finale.
The rub occurs when "racist" measures are needed to hasten the advent of >>>> equal opportunity. E.g., for blacks to be accepted as doctors, a few >>>> have to be coerced into (also coerced) medical schools.
"It's okay when we're racist because our hearts are with the angels!"
Still waiting for something besides your dodge of the question up top...
I don't see a question mark anywhere in your previous post.
The question atop *this* post...
In article <17c31d1f5509348f$33221$111488$4ed50460@news.newsdemon.com>,
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 4/3/2024 7:30 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 4/3/2024 5:25 PM, BTR1701 wrote:I don't see a question mark anywhere in your previous post.
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:Still waiting for something besides your dodge of the question up top... >>>
On 4/3/2024 5:36 AM, The Horny Goat wrote:
On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 22:17:03 -0400, moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote: >>>>>>>
If despite the racial progress made both legally and in every other >>>>>>> way is STILL considered racist (and the BLM people DO demonize MLK for >>>>>>> advocating equality of opportunity rather than equality of results) >>>>>>> then why persist with legal equality?If a society inherits a racist component, as ours has, what measures >>>>>>>>>> canYour question rests on a false premise with your use of the word >>>>>>>>> 'mislabeled'.
address it that can't be (mis)labeled 'racist' by those so inclined? >>>>>>>>>
Your best response is to cavil at my parenthetical editorializing? >>>>>>>>
Obviously that's a rhetorical question but my point is that the BLM + >>>>>>> company definition of "justice" and "equality" (which is the same as >>>>>>> the DEI definition which is 'equality of results" not opportunity) is >>>>>>> positively obscene.
Go back and re-read the ENTIRE "I have a dream" speech and don't just >>>>>>> pay attention to the last minute of it (which is all most of us
remember). If you pay attention to the first half of the speech you'll >>>>>>> see King rips several states quite hard for racism before he gets to >>>>>>> the part about his children that we all remember.
https://www.npr.org/2010/01/18/122701268/i-have-a-dream-speech-in-its-en
tirety
For my money the first half is at least as important as his inspiring >>>>>>> finale.
The rub occurs when "racist" measures are needed to hasten the advent of >>>>>> equal opportunity. E.g., for blacks to be accepted as doctors, a few >>>>>> have to be coerced into (also coerced) medical schools.
"It's okay when we're racist because our hearts are with the angels!" >>>>
The question atop *this* post...
Why would I be answering a question five levels up? I respond to the immediate post before mine.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 66:47:24 |
| Calls: | 6,712 |
| Files: | 12,244 |
| Messages: | 5,356,315 |