Eight states offer all students,
regardless of household income,
free school meals - and more
states are trending in the
direction. But while people across
the country move to feed school
children, congressional Republicans
are looking to stop the cause.
The budget - co-signed by more
than 170 House Republicans - calls
to eliminate "the Community
Eligibility Provision (CEP) from
the School Lunch Program." The CEP,
the Republicans note, "allows
certain schools to provide free
school lunches regardless of the
individual eligibility of each
student."
https://theintercept.com/2024/03/21/house-republicans-ban-universal-scho >ol-lunches/
Eight states offer all students,
regardless of household income,
free school meals - and more
states are trending in the
direction. But while people across
the country move to feed school
children, congressional Republicans
are looking to stop the cause.
The budget - co-signed by more
than 170 House Republicans - calls
to eliminate "the Community
Eligibility Provision (CEP) from
the School Lunch Program." The CEP,
the Republicans note, "allows
certain schools to provide free
school lunches regardless of the
individual eligibility of each
student."
https://theintercept.com/2024/03/21/house-republicans-ban-universal-sch
o ol-lunches/
I'm surprised they haven't passed laws prohibiting children from
attending school because an educated citizen won't vote for them.
Most say they'd better hand some tax cuts over to rich people or
they'll move to Saudi Arabia where they're are no taxes.
Donald Trump still king of the ‘poorly educated’
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/sep/29/donald-trump-still-kin
g- poorly-educated/
Voice of Authority <privatemail@protonmail.com> wrote in news:utkl9s$33g89$1@dont-email.me:
Eight states offer all students,
regardless of household income,
free school meals - and more
states are trending in the
direction. But while people across
the country move to feed school
children, congressional Republicans
are looking to stop the cause.
The budget - co-signed by more
than 170 House Republicans - calls
to eliminate "the Community
Eligibility Provision (CEP) from
the School Lunch Program." The CEP,
the Republicans note, "allows
certain schools to provide free
school lunches regardless of the
individual eligibility of each
student."
https://theintercept.com/2024/03/21/house-republicans-ban-universal-sch
o ol-lunches/
I'm surprised they haven't passed laws prohibiting children from
attending school because an educated citizen won't vote for them.
Most say they'd better hand some tax cuts over to rich people or
they'll move to Saudi Arabia where they're are no taxes.
Donald Trump still king of the ?poorly educated?
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/sep/29/donald-trump-still-kin
g- poorly-educated/
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public Schools of
any ability to actually educate, fund those private schools that indoctrinate.
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public Schools of
any ability to actually educate, fund those private schools that indoctrinate.
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public
Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private
schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a dress
and make up.
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public Schools of
any ability to actually educate, fund those private schools that
indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a dress
and make up.
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public
Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private
schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a dress
and make up.
On 22 Mar 2024, GEO <George@Foo.invalid> posted some news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public
Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private
schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a dress
and make up.
Ain't that the truth? Especially in Oregon.
On 22 Mar 2024, GEO <George@Foo.invalid> posted some news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public
Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private
schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a dress
and make up.
Ain't that the truth? Especially in Oregon.
lloyd <lloyd@demon.net> wrote in news:utl8jt$3avdt$2@news.mixmin.net:
On 22 Mar 2024, GEO <George@Foo.invalid> posted some news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public
Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private
schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a dress
and make up.
Ain't that the truth? Especially in Oregon.
Just another pervert chimes in.
GEO <George@Foo.invalid> wrote in news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public
Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private
schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a dress
and make up.
More conservaturd propaganda. And you're obsessed with other people's sex. Don't be following people into the restroom.
lloyd <lloyd@demon.net> wrote in news:utl8jt$3avdt$2@news.mixmin.net:
On 22 Mar 2024, GEO <George@Foo.invalid> posted some news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public
Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private
schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a dress
and make up.
Ain't that the truth? Especially in Oregon.
School vouchers be like:
'I don't like the public parks, so I want my kid to go to the Country Club
to play - and I want the Public Parks to pay for it.' 'oh! and I want my property taxes reduced by not paying for those public parks.'
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO <George@Foo.invalid> wrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a dress
and make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
In article <utlg6s$3d8um$3@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
lloyd <lloyd@demon.net> wrote in news:utl8jt$3avdt$2@news.mixmin.net:
On 22 Mar 2024, GEO <George@Foo.invalid> posted some
news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public
Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private
schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a
dress and make up.
Ain't that the truth? Especially in Oregon.
School vouchers be like:
'I don't like the public parks, so I want my kid to go to the Country
Club to play - and I want the Public Parks to pay for it.' 'oh! and
I want my property taxes reduced by not paying for those public
parks.'
Who said that? Why did they take trade classes out of the schools?
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>, governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO <George@Foo.invalid>
wrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a dress
and make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let him home
school. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be women.
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO <George@Foo.invalid>
wrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a dress
and make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let him home
school. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools you went to
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so fragile?
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public
Schools of any ability to actually educate,...
... fund those private schools that indoctrinate.
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:65fedd22$0$6400 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utlfnn$3d8um$2@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
lloyd <lloyd@demon.net> wrote in news:utl8jt$3avdt$2@news.mixmin.net:
On 22 Mar 2024, GEO <George@Foo.invalid> posted some
news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public
Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private
schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a dress
and make up.
Ain't that the truth? Especially in Oregon.
Just another pervert chimes in.
We don't allow men into womens restrooms.
How do you know they are a "man"? You going to check in everyone's underware? And why just those using the womens restrooms?
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:65feddae$0$6401$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utlg6s$3d8um$3@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
lloyd <lloyd@demon.net> wrote in news:utl8jt$3avdt$2@news.mixmin.net:
On 22 Mar 2024, GEO <George@Foo.invalid> posted some
news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public
Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private
schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a
dress and make up.
Ain't that the truth? Especially in Oregon.
School vouchers be like:
'I don't like the public parks, so I want my kid to go to the Country
Club to play - and I want the Public Parks to pay for it.' 'oh! and
I want my property taxes reduced by not paying for those public
parks.'
Who said that? Why did they take trade classes out of the schools?
What part of "School vouchers be like:" did you not understand?
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>, governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO <George@Foo.invalid>
wrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a dress
and make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let him home
school. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools you went to
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so fragile?
In article <utlg6s$3d8um$3@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
lloyd <lloyd@demon.net> wrote in news:utl8jt$3avdt$2@news.mixmin.net:
On 22 Mar 2024, GEO <George@Foo.invalid> posted some
news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public
Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private
schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a dress
and make up.
Ain't that the truth? Especially in Oregon.
School vouchers be like:
'I don't like the public parks, so I want my kid to go to the Country Club >> to play - and I want the Public Parks to pay for it.' 'oh! and I want my
property taxes reduced by not paying for those public parks.'
Who said that? Why did they take trade classes out of the schools?
In news:utkqo8$34tj5$3@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public
Schools of any ability to actually educate,...
That ship sailed long ago. How do vouchers make any difference?
... fund those private schools that indoctrinate.
As if government schools don't.
In article <utmptc$3mj2s$1@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:65fedd22$0$6400
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utlfnn$3d8um$2@dont-email.me>,
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
lloyd <lloyd@demon.net> wrote in
news:utl8jt$3avdt$2@news.mixmin.net:
On 22 Mar 2024, GEO <George@Foo.invalid> posted some
news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public
Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private
schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they
teach is that if you are male you are female and you need to
wear a dress and make up.
Ain't that the truth? Especially in Oregon.
Just another pervert chimes in.
We don't allow men into womens restrooms.
How do you know they are a "man"? You going to check in everyone's
underware? And why just those using the womens restrooms?
Nice spin. You have nothing. Planet Fitness tried that and lost big.
In article <utmpuu$3mj2s$2@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says..._spamblock@baxcode.com
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddae$0$6401$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utlg6s$3d8um$3@dont-email.me>, bax02
@news.mixmin.net:says...
lloyd <lloyd@demon.net> wrote in news:utl8jt$3avdt$2
teach
On 22 Mar 2024, GEO <George@Foo.invalid> posted some
news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public
Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private
schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they
Countryis that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a
dress and make up.
Ain't that the truth? Especially in Oregon.
School vouchers be like:
'I don't like the public parks, so I want my kid to go to the
andClub to play - and I want the Public Parks to pay for it.' 'oh!
I want my property taxes reduced by not paying for those public
parks.'
Who said that? Why did they take trade classes out of the schools?
What part of "School vouchers be like:" did you not understand?
Why didn't you answer the question?
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...dress
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO <George@Foo.invalid>
wrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a
toand make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let him home
school. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools you went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so fragile?
A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
On 3/23/2024 7:48 AM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <utlg6s$3d8um$3@dont-email.me>,We should take the federal government out of schools. According to
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
lloyd <lloyd@demon.net> wrote in
news:utl8jt$3avdt$2@news.mixmin.net:
On 22 Mar 2024, GEO <George@Foo.invalid> posted some
news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public
Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private
schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a
dress and make up.
Ain't that the truth? Especially in Oregon.
School vouchers be like:
'I don't like the public parks, so I want my kid to go to the
Country Club to play - and I want the Public Parks to pay for it.'
'oh! and I want my property taxes reduced by not paying for those
public parks.'
Who said that? Why did they take trade classes out of the schools?
the Constitution it doesn't belong there.
"max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in news:utmqo3$3mrti$2@dont-email.me:
In news:utkqo8$34tj5$3@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public
Schools of any ability to actually educate,...
That ship sailed long ago. How do vouchers make any difference?
... fund those private schools that indoctrinate.
As if government schools don't.
You know god-damned well that's a lie
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:65ff0c88$0$4188 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmpuu$3mj2s$2@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says..._spamblock@baxcode.com
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddae$0$6401$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utlg6s$3d8um$3@dont-email.me>, bax02
@news.mixmin.net:says...
lloyd <lloyd@demon.net> wrote in news:utl8jt$3avdt$2
teach
On 22 Mar 2024, GEO <George@Foo.invalid> posted some
news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public
Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private
schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they
Countryis that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a
dress and make up.
Ain't that the truth? Especially in Oregon.
School vouchers be like:
'I don't like the public parks, so I want my kid to go to the
andClub to play - and I want the Public Parks to pay for it.' 'oh!
I want my property taxes reduced by not paying for those public
parks.'
Who said that? Why did they take trade classes out of the schools?
What part of "School vouchers be like:" did you not understand?
Why didn't you answer the question?
What?! Are you trying to change the subject? Asking about Trade classe? Trade Classes are now in Community Colleges - the High Schools have been stripped of funding.
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:65ff0cb0$1$4195 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...dress
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO <George@Foo.invalid>
wrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a
toand make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let him home
school. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools you went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so fragile?
A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger roles have
swapped for thousands of years.
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:65ff0cb0$1$4195 >$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.comdress
says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO <George@Foo.invalid>
wrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a
toand make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let him home
school. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools you went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so fragile?
A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger roles have
swapped for thousands of years.
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote in
news:VuGLN.723169$p%Mb.330709@fx15.iad:
On 3/23/2024 7:48 AM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <utlg6s$3d8um$3@dont-email.me>,We should take the federal government out of schools. According to
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
lloyd <lloyd@demon.net> wrote in
news:utl8jt$3avdt$2@news.mixmin.net:
On 22 Mar 2024, GEO <George@Foo.invalid> posted some
news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public
Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private
schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they teach >>>>>> is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a
dress and make up.
Ain't that the truth? Especially in Oregon.
School vouchers be like:
'I don't like the public parks, so I want my kid to go to the
Country Club to play - and I want the Public Parks to pay for it.'
'oh! and I want my property taxes reduced by not paying for those
public parks.'
Who said that? Why did they take trade classes out of the schools?
the Constitution it doesn't belong there.
Where in the Constitution does it say anything about schools?
On Sat, 23 Mar 2024 13:57:42 -0600, Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote:
We should take the federal government out of schools. According to
the Constitution it doesn't belong there.
Where does the Constitution forbid the Federal Government from participating in Education?
How many states would gladly give up all Federal education money in order to comply with
your version of the C?
Swill
On Sat, 23 Mar 2024 13:57:42 -0600, Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote:
We should take the federal government out of schools. According to
the Constitution it doesn't belong there.
Where does the Constitution forbid the Federal Government from participating in Education?
How many states would gladly give up all Federal education money in order to comply with
your version of the C?
Swill
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:_spamblock@baxcode.com
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:65ff0cb0$1$4195 >>$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02
<George@Foo.invalid>says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO
teachwrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they
homedressis that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a
and make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let him
toschool. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools you went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so fragile?
A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger roles have >>swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >news:49200jta9t047a6e3su01h8o4fc69t1s4f@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxter_spamblock@baxcode.com
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:65ff0cb0$1$4195 >>>$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02
<George@Foo.invalid>says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO
teachwrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they
homeis that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a >>>dress
and make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let him
school. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools you went >>>to
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so fragile?
A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger roles have >>>swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Surgery has advanced in those millenia. But think about it - back then, 3 >sexes = male, female, castrati
That wasn't a government decision.
That said, you're correct. To little attention is paid to the basics in early grades. One
and two should be about reading and arithmetic. If you can get them into third grade with
high reading skills and solid understanding of number basic, you can rapidly accelerate
them through the rest of the grade levels.
Teach them to read!
"max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in news:utmqo3$3mrti$2@dont-email.me:
In news:utkqo8$34tj5$3@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public
Schools of any ability to actually educate,...
That ship sailed long ago. How do vouchers make any difference?
... fund those private schools that indoctrinate.
As if government schools don't.
You know god-damned well that's a lie
On Sat, 23 Mar 2024 07:57:00 -0700, "max headroom" wrote:
In news:utkqo8$34tj5$3@dont-email.me, Baxter typed:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public
Schools of any ability to actually educate,...
That ship sailed long ago. How do vouchers make any difference?
... fund those private schools that indoctrinate.
As if government schools don't.
Really? What religion do they indoctrinate in?
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in news:49200jta9t047a6e3su01h8o4fc69t1s4f@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
_spamblock@baxcode.comSkeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:65ff0cb0$1$4195 >>$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02
<George@Foo.invalid>says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO
teachwrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they
homeis that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a >>dress
and make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let him
school. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools you went >>to
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so fragile?
A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger roles have >>swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Surgery has advanced in those millenia. But think about it - back then, 3 sexes = male, female, castrati
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 15:42:13 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>news:49200jta9t047a6e3su01h8o4fc69t1s4f@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxter_spamblock@baxcode.com
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:65ff0cb0$1$4195 >>>>$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02
<George@Foo.invalid>says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO
teachwrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they
homeis that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a >>>>dress
and make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let him
toschool. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be
women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools you
went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so fragile?
A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger roles
have swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Surgery has advanced in those millenia. But think about it - back
then, 3 sexes = male, female, castrati
So, I guess you understand that cutting off a man's genitals doesn't
change him into a woman. Of course if he does it voluntarily, it does
turn him into a freak, well, no, actually, he's a freak simply because
he considers doing it.
On Sat, 23 Mar 2024 04:34:38 -0400, Governor Swill
<governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
That wasn't a government decision.
That said, you're correct. To little attention is paid to the basics
in early grades. One and two should be about reading and arithmetic.
If you can get them into third grade with high reading skills and
solid understanding of number basic, you can rapidly accelerate them >>through the rest of the grade levels.
Teach them to read!
I was reading confidently when I entered grade 1. The main problem I
had was that being tall I was placed at the back of the classroom and
my teacher noticed early on that (a) I could read, (b) I was VERY good
at verbal questions but challenged on written questions (e.g. on the blackboard).
Fortunately for me my teacher diagnosed my problem and called my
mother telling her that her son needed an eye exam and probably
glasses. These days I might be diagnosed as "gifted / learning
disabled" and prescribed all sorts of medications to solve my problem.
Since we were on the north shore we had to go downtown to the
optometrist and the day I got my glasses on the way home I asked my
mother what those things were in the water. She was shocked as she
only realized then that I had never seen the ships passing through the narrows before... needless to say after that I had a very successful
grade 1 and the rest of my elementary days.
Thank you Mrs. James!
In news:uto3ka$96f$1@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
"max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in
news:utmqo3$3mrti$2@dont-email.me:
In news:utkqo8$34tj5$3@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public
Schools of any ability to actually educate,...
That ship sailed long ago. How do vouchers make any difference?
... fund those private schools that indoctrinate.
As if government schools don't.
You know god-damned well that's a lie
Wrong again, Leroy.
In news:pu900jpq12i6q3nm5bgd7jgeusnr92kh95@4ax.com, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> typed:
On Sat, 23 Mar 2024 07:57:00 -0700, "max headroom" wrote:
In news:utkqo8$34tj5$3@dont-email.me, Baxter typed:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public
Schools of any ability to actually educate,...
That ship sailed long ago. How do vouchers make any difference?
... fund those private schools that indoctrinate.
As if government schools don't.
Really? What religion do they indoctrinate in?
Verb
indoctrinate (third-person singular simple present indoctrinates,
present participle indoctrinating, simple past and past participle
indoctrinated)
1.. To teach with a biased, one-sided or uncritical ideology; to
brainwash.
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/indoctrinate
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >news:i6j00j1h6g8hk37v90j8psaj4ijr8fhgip@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 15:42:13 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>news:49200jta9t047a6e3su01h8o4fc69t1s4f@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:65ff0cb0$1$4195 >>>>>$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02 >>>_spamblock@baxcode.comto
says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO >>><George@Foo.invalid>
wrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they >>>teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a >>>>>dress
and make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let him >>>home
school. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be
women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools you
went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so fragile?
A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger roles
have swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Surgery has advanced in those millenia. But think about it - back
then, 3 sexes = male, female, castrati
So, I guess you understand that cutting off a man's genitals doesn't
change him into a woman. Of course if he does it voluntarily, it does
turn him into a freak, well, no, actually, he's a freak simply because
he considers doing it.
What part of "3 sexes" did you not understand?
In article <utphkk$eikh$1@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:49200jta9t047a6e3su01h8o4fc69t1s4f@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxter_spamblock@baxcode.com
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:65ff0cb0$1$4195
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02
<George@Foo.invalid>says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO
teachwrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they
homedressis that if you are male you are female and you need to wear
a
and make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let him
toschool. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be
women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools you
went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so fragile?
A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger roles
have swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Surgery has advanced in those millenia. But think about it - back
then, 3 sexes = male, female, castrati
What advance? You sew a dick on a woman, she's still a woman. Drill a
hole in the guy that just lost his dick and he's still a man.
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:23:21 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:a
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>news:i6j00j1h6g8hk37v90j8psaj4ijr8fhgip@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 15:42:13 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>news:49200jta9t047a6e3su01h8o4fc69t1s4f@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:65ff0cb0$1$4195 >>>>>>$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02 >>>>_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO >>>><George@Foo.invalid>
wrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they >>>>teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear
doesdress
toand make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let him >>>>home
school. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be
women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools you >>>>>>>> went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so fragile? >>>>>>>A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger roles >>>>>>have swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Surgery has advanced in those millenia. But think about it - back
then, 3 sexes = male, female, castrati
So, I guess you understand that cutting off a man's genitals doesn't
change him into a woman. Of course if he does it voluntarily, it
becauseturn him into a freak, well, no, actually, he's a freak simply
he considers doing it.
What part of "3 sexes" did you not understand?
4... Male, female, ????, and freak..
In article <utphkk$eikh$1@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:49200jta9t047a6e3su01h8o4fc69t1s4f@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxter_spamblock@baxcode.com
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:65ff0cb0$1$4195
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02
<George@Foo.invalid>says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO
teachwrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they
homedressis that if you are male you are female and you need to wear
a
and make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let him
toschool. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be
women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools you
went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so fragile?
A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger roles
have swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Surgery has advanced in those millenia. But think about it - back
then, 3 sexes = male, female, castrati
What advance? You sew a dick on a woman, she's still a woman. Drill a
hole in the guy that just lost his dick and he's still a man.
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in >news:66006d63$0$876051$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utphkk$eikh$1@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:49200jta9t047a6e3su01h8o4fc69t1s4f@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxter_spamblock@baxcode.com
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:65ff0cb0$1$4195
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02
<George@Foo.invalid>says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO
teachwrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they
homedressis that if you are male you are female and you need to wear
a
and make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let him
toschool. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be
women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools you
went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so fragile?
A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger roles
have swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Surgery has advanced in those millenia. But think about it - back
then, 3 sexes = male, female, castrati
What advance? You sew a dick on a woman, she's still a woman. Drill a
hole in the guy that just lost his dick and he's still a man.
Genetic sex and psycological gender don't always match.
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >news:hpv00jd0fh55t224bn3q6282oba4608kba@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:23:21 -0000 (UTC), Baxtera
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>news:i6j00j1h6g8hk37v90j8psaj4ijr8fhgip@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 15:42:13 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>news:49200jta9t047a6e3su01h8o4fc69t1s4f@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:65ff0cb0$1$4195 >>>>>>>$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02 >>>>>_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO >>>>><George@Foo.invalid>
wrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they >>>>>teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear
doesdress
toand make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let him >>>>>home
school. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be
women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools you >>>>>>>>> went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so fragile? >>>>>>>>A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger roles >>>>>>>have swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Surgery has advanced in those millenia. But think about it - back >>>>>then, 3 sexes = male, female, castrati
So, I guess you understand that cutting off a man's genitals doesn't
change him into a woman. Of course if he does it voluntarily, it
becauseturn him into a freak, well, no, actually, he's a freak simply
he considers doing it.
What part of "3 sexes" did you not understand?
4... Male, female, ????, and freak..
So you think all castrati were "freaks"?!!
think so. Often they had important jobs - like singers (opera. choir),
haram guards/attendants, etc
==========
Over the millennia since, they have performed a wide variety of functions
in many different cultures: courtiers or equivalent domestics, for
espionage or clandestine operations, castrato singers, concubines or
sexual partners, religious specialists, soldiers, royal guards,
government officials, and guardians of women or harem servants.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castrato
In article <utphkk$eikh$1@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:49200jta9t047a6e3su01h8o4fc69t1s4f@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxter_spamblock@baxcode.com
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:65ff0cb0$1$4195
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02
<George@Foo.invalid>says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO
teachwrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they
homedressis that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a
and make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let him
school. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be women. >>>>>>>
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools you went >>>> to
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so fragile?
A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger roles have
swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Surgery has advanced in those millenia. But think about it - back then, 3
sexes = male, female, castrati
What advance? You sew a dick on a woman, she's still a woman. Drill a
hole in the guy that just lost his dick and he's still a man.
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in >news:66006d63$0$876051$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utphkk$eikh$1@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:49200jta9t047a6e3su01h8o4fc69t1s4f@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxter_spamblock@baxcode.com
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:65ff0cb0$1$4195
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02
<George@Foo.invalid>says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO
teachwrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they
homedressis that if you are male you are female and you need to wear
a
and make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let him
toschool. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be
women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools you
went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so fragile?
A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger roles
have swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Surgery has advanced in those millenia. But think about it - back
then, 3 sexes = male, female, castrati
What advance? You sew a dick on a woman, she's still a woman. Drill a
hole in the guy that just lost his dick and he's still a man.
And what about those born with both dick and vagina? Or neither dick nor >vagina?
Mother Nature is not a bigot like you.
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:23:21 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >news:i6j00j1h6g8hk37v90j8psaj4ijr8fhgip@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 15:42:13 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>news:49200jta9t047a6e3su01h8o4fc69t1s4f@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:65ff0cb0$1$4195 >>>>>$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02 >>>_spamblock@baxcode.comto
says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO >>><George@Foo.invalid>
wrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they >>>teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a >>>>>dress
and make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let him >>>home
school. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be
women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools you >>>>>>> went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so fragile? >>>>>>A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger roles >>>>>have swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Surgery has advanced in those millenia. But think about it - back
then, 3 sexes = male, female, castrati
So, I guess you understand that cutting off a man's genitals doesn't
change him into a woman. Of course if he does it voluntarily, it does
turn him into a freak, well, no, actually, he's a freak simply because
he considers doing it.
What part of "3 sexes" did you not understand?
4... Male, female, ????, and freak..
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:66006d63$0$876051$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utphkk$eikh$1@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:49200jta9t047a6e3su01h8o4fc69t1s4f@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxter_spamblock@baxcode.com
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:65ff0cb0$1$4195
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02
<George@Foo.invalid>says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO
teachwrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they
homedressis that if you are male you are female and you need to wear
a
and make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let him
toschool. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be
women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools you
went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so fragile?
A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger roles
have swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Surgery has advanced in those millenia. But think about it - back
then, 3 sexes = male, female, castrati
What advance? You sew a dick on a woman, she's still a woman. Drill a
hole in the guy that just lost his dick and he's still a man.
Genetic sex and psycological gender don't always match.
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:66006d63$0$876051$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utphkk$eikh$1@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:49200jta9t047a6e3su01h8o4fc69t1s4f@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxter_spamblock@baxcode.com
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:65ff0cb0$1$4195
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02
<George@Foo.invalid>says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO
teachwrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they
homedressis that if you are male you are female and you need to wear
a
and make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let him
toschool. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be
women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools you
went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so fragile?
A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger roles
have swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Surgery has advanced in those millenia. But think about it - back
then, 3 sexes = male, female, castrati
What advance? You sew a dick on a woman, she's still a woman. Drill a
hole in the guy that just lost his dick and he's still a man.
And what about those born with both dick and vagina? Or neither dick nor vagina?
Mother Nature is not a bigot like you.
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in news:i6j00j1h6g8hk37v90j8psaj4ijr8fhgip@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 15:42:13 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:49200jta9t047a6e3su01h8o4fc69t1s4f@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxter_spamblock@baxcode.com
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:65ff0cb0$1$4195
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02
<George@Foo.invalid>says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO
teachwrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they
homedressis that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a
and make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let him
toschool. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be
women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools you
went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so fragile?
A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger roles
have swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Surgery has advanced in those millenia. But think about it - back
then, 3 sexes = male, female, castrati
So, I guess you understand that cutting off a man's genitals doesn't
change him into a woman. Of course if he does it voluntarily, it does
turn him into a freak, well, no, actually, he's a freak simply because
he considers doing it.
What part of "3 sexes" did you not understand?
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:66006d63$0$876051$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utphkk$eikh$1@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:49200jta9t047a6e3su01h8o4fc69t1s4f@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxter_spamblock@baxcode.com
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:65ff0cb0$1$4195
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02
<George@Foo.invalid>says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO
teachwrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they
homedressis that if you are male you are female and you need to wear >>>>>>>>>> a
and make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let him
toschool. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be
women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools you
went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so fragile?
A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger roles
have swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Surgery has advanced in those millenia. But think about it - back
then, 3 sexes = male, female, castrati
What advance? You sew a dick on a woman, she's still a woman. Drill a
hole in the guy that just lost his dick and he's still a man.
And what about those born with both dick and vagina? Or neither dick nor vagina?
Mother Nature is not a bigot like you.
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:37:49 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:hpv00jd0fh55t224bn3q6282oba4608kba@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:23:21 -0000 (UTC), Baxtera
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:i6j00j1h6g8hk37v90j8psaj4ijr8fhgip@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 15:42:13 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:49200jta9t047a6e3su01h8o4fc69t1s4f@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxter_spamblock@baxcode.com
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:65ff0cb0$1$4195 >>>>>>>> $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02
<George@Foo.invalid>says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>, >>>>>>>>>>> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO
wrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they >>>>>> teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear
doesdress
toand make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let him >>>>>> home
school. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be >>>>>>>>>>> women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools you >>>>>>>>>> went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so fragile? >>>>>>>>>A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger roles >>>>>>>> have swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Surgery has advanced in those millenia. But think about it - back
then, 3 sexes = male, female, castrati
So, I guess you understand that cutting off a man's genitals doesn't >>>>> change him into a woman. Of course if he does it voluntarily, it
becauseturn him into a freak, well, no, actually, he's a freak simply
he considers doing it.
What part of "3 sexes" did you not understand?
4... Male, female, ????, and freak..
So you think all castrati were "freaks"?!!
Can't you read? I said he's a freak if he does it voluntarily.
Otherwise, he's a victim.
In article <utpv3e$hrdc$5@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:66006d63$0$876051$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utphkk$eikh$1@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:49200jta9t047a6e3su01h8o4fc69t1s4f@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxter_spamblock@baxcode.com
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:65ff0cb0$1$4195 >>>>>> $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02
<George@Foo.invalid>says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO
teachwrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they
homedressis that if you are male you are female and you need to wear >>>>>>>>>>> a
and make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let him
toschool. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be
women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools you >>>>>>>> went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so fragile? >>>>>>>A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger roles
have swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Surgery has advanced in those millenia. But think about it - back
then, 3 sexes = male, female, castrati
What advance? You sew a dick on a woman, she's still a woman. Drill a
hole in the guy that just lost his dick and he's still a man.
Genetic sex and psycological gender don't always match.
That's the point.
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 07:08:42 -0400, Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:02:54 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote in
news:VuGLN.723169$p%Mb.330709@fx15.iad:
On 3/23/2024 7:48 AM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <utlg6s$3d8um$3@dont-email.me>,We should take the federal government out of schools. According to
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
lloyd <lloyd@demon.net> wrote in
news:utl8jt$3avdt$2@news.mixmin.net:
On 22 Mar 2024, GEO <George@Foo.invalid> posted some
news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public >>>>>>>>> Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private >>>>>>>>> schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they teach >>>>>>>> is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a
dress and make up.
Ain't that the truth? Especially in Oregon.
School vouchers be like:
'I don't like the public parks, so I want my kid to go to the
Country Club to play - and I want the Public Parks to pay for it.' >>>>>> 'oh! and I want my property taxes reduced by not paying for those
public parks.'
Who said that? Why did they take trade classes out of the schools?
the Constitution it doesn't belong there.
Where in the Constitution does it say anything about schools?
Nowhere, Dummy, that's the point
Then there's no reason for the Federal government to not participate in schools since
isn't forbidden.
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:31:58 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:they
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in >>news:66006d63$0$876051$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utphkk$eikh$1@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:49200jta9t047a6e3su01h8o4fc69t1s4f@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxter_spamblock@baxcode.com
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:65ff0cb0$1$4195
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02
<George@Foo.invalid>says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO
wrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing
himteach
dressis that if you are male you are female and you need to wear
a
and make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let
fragile?home
toschool. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be
women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools you
went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so
A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger roles
have swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Surgery has advanced in those millenia. But think about it - back
then, 3 sexes = male, female, castrati
What advance? You sew a dick on a woman, she's still a woman. Drill a
hole in the guy that just lost his dick and he's still a man.
Genetic sex and psycological gender don't always match.
Only one way to detirmine sex/gender... penis vs vagina.
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:40:30 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in >>news:66006d63$0$876051$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utphkk$eikh$1@dont-email.me>,
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:49200jta9t047a6e3su01h8o4fc69t1s4f@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxter_spamblock@baxcode.com
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65ff0cb0$1$4195 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02
<George@Foo.invalid>says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO
teachwrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing
they
homedressis that if you are male you are female and you need to
wear a
and make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let
him
toschool. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be
women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools
you went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so
fragile?
A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger roles
have swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Surgery has advanced in those millenia. But think about it - back
then, 3 sexes = male, female, castrati
What advance? You sew a dick on a woman, she's still a woman. Drill
a hole in the guy that just lost his dick and he's still a man.
And what about those born with both dick and vagina? Or neither dick
nor vagina?
Same as people with two heads.....
Mother Nature is not a bigot like you.
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:37:49 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>news:hpv00jd0fh55t224bn3q6282oba4608kba@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:23:21 -0000 (UTC), Baxtera
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>news:i6j00j1h6g8hk37v90j8psaj4ijr8fhgip@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 15:42:13 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>news:49200jta9t047a6e3su01h8o4fc69t1s4f@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxterteach
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>news:65ff0cb0$1$4195 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02 >>>>>>_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>, >>>>>>>>>> > governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO >>>>>><George@Foo.invalid>
wrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing >>>>>>>>>> >> >they
is that if you are male you are female and you need to >>>>>>>>>> >> >wear
doeshomedress
and make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let >>>>>>>>>> > him
toschool. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be >>>>>>>>>> > women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools >>>>>>>>>> you went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so
fragile?
A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger roles >>>>>>>>have swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Surgery has advanced in those millenia. But think about it - back >>>>>>then, 3 sexes = male, female, castrati
So, I guess you understand that cutting off a man's genitals
doesn't change him into a woman. Of course if he does it
voluntarily, it
becauseturn him into a freak, well, no, actually, he's a freak simply
he considers doing it.
What part of "3 sexes" did you not understand?
4... Male, female, ????, and freak..
So you think all castrati were "freaks"?!!
Can't you read? I said he's a freak if he does it voluntarily.
Otherwise, he's a victim.
The people at the time didn't
think so. Often they had important jobs - like singers (opera.
choir), haram guards/attendants, etc
==========
Over the millennia since, they have performed a wide variety of
functions in many different cultures: courtiers or equivalent
domestics, for espionage or clandestine operations, castrato singers, >>concubines or sexual partners, religious specialists, soldiers, royal >>guards, government officials, and guardians of women or harem
servants.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castrato
Contrary to the oft-heard mantra, gender is NOT a social construct.
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in news:j4010jhrpf5bu0o791lo9lhf27krttsb6p@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:31:58 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
theySkeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in >>news:66006d63$0$876051$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utphkk$eikh$1@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:49200jta9t047a6e3su01h8o4fc69t1s4f@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxter_spamblock@baxcode.com
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:65ff0cb0$1$4195 >>>> >>$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02
<George@Foo.invalid>says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO
wrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing
himteach
dressis that if you are male you are female and you need to wear >>>> >>>> >> >a
and make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let
fragile?home
toschool. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be
women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools you >>>> >>>> went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so
A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger roles
have swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Surgery has advanced in those millenia. But think about it - back
then, 3 sexes = male, female, castrati
What advance? You sew a dick on a woman, she's still a woman. Drill a
hole in the guy that just lost his dick and he's still a man.
Genetic sex and psycological gender don't always match.
Only one way to detirmine sex/gender... penis vs vagina.
Sex and gender are not the same thing. And there are hermaphrodites.
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 07:08:42 -0400, Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:02:54 -0000 (UTC), Baxter ><bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote in >>news:VuGLN.723169$p%Mb.330709@fx15.iad:
On 3/23/2024 7:48 AM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <utlg6s$3d8um$3@dont-email.me>,We should take the federal government out of schools. According to
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
lloyd <lloyd@demon.net> wrote in
news:utl8jt$3avdt$2@news.mixmin.net:
On 22 Mar 2024, GEO <George@Foo.invalid> posted some
news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public >>>>>>>> Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private >>>>>>>> schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they teach >>>>>>> is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a
dress and make up.
Ain't that the truth? Especially in Oregon.
School vouchers be like:
'I don't like the public parks, so I want my kid to go to the
Country Club to play - and I want the Public Parks to pay for it.' >>>>> 'oh! and I want my property taxes reduced by not paying for those
public parks.'
Who said that? Why did they take trade classes out of the schools?
the Constitution it doesn't belong there.
Where in the Constitution does it say anything about schools?
Nowhere, Dummy, that's the point
Then there's no reason for the Federal government to not participate in schools since
isn't forbidden.
Swill
In article <94n10j1rm6md8mr1iepq47o18klapaj4o8@4ax.com>, governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 07:08:42 -0400, Blue Lives Matter
<Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:02:54 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote in
news:VuGLN.723169$p%Mb.330709@fx15.iad:
On 3/23/2024 7:48 AM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <utlg6s$3d8um$3@dont-email.me>,We should take the federal government out of schools. According to
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
lloyd <lloyd@demon.net> wrote in
news:utl8jt$3avdt$2@news.mixmin.net:
On 22 Mar 2024, GEO <George@Foo.invalid> posted some
news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public >>>>>>>>>> Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private >>>>>>>>>> schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they teach >>>>>>>>> is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a >>>>>>>>> dress and make up.
Ain't that the truth? Especially in Oregon.
School vouchers be like:
'I don't like the public parks, so I want my kid to go to the
Country Club to play - and I want the Public Parks to pay for it.' >>>>>>> 'oh! and I want my property taxes reduced by not paying for those >>>>>>> public parks.'
Who said that? Why did they take trade classes out of the schools? >>>>>>
the Constitution it doesn't belong there.
Where in the Constitution does it say anything about schools?
Nowhere, Dummy, that's the point
Then there's no reason for the Federal government to not participate in schools since
isn't forbidden.
Swill
That's why I pulled my son from public school.
On 3/24/2024 7:08 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 07:08:42 -0400, Blue Lives Matter
<Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:02:54 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote in
news:VuGLN.723169$p%Mb.330709@fx15.iad:
On 3/23/2024 7:48 AM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <utlg6s$3d8um$3@dont-email.me>,We should take the federal government out of schools. According to
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
lloyd <lloyd@demon.net> wrote in
news:utl8jt$3avdt$2@news.mixmin.net:
On 22 Mar 2024, GEO <George@Foo.invalid> posted some
news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public >>>>>>>>>> Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private >>>>>>>>>> schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they teach >>>>>>>>> is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a >>>>>>>>> dress and make up.
Ain't that the truth? Especially in Oregon.
School vouchers be like:
'I don't like the public parks, so I want my kid to go to the
Country Club to play - and I want the Public Parks to pay for it.' >>>>>>> 'oh! and I want my property taxes reduced by not paying for those >>>>>>> public parks.'
Who said that? Why did they take trade classes out of the schools? >>>>>>
the Constitution it doesn't belong there.
Where in the Constitution does it say anything about schools?
Nowhere, Dummy, that's the point
Then there's no reason for the Federal government to not participate in schools since
isn't forbidden.
That's not the way federalism works. Congressional legislation must be >authorized by a power delineated in Article I (as well as not prohibited
by something like the First Amendment).
In this case, funding schools is authorized by the Taxing Clause in
Article I.
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >news:j4010jhrpf5bu0o791lo9lhf27krttsb6p@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:31:58 -0000 (UTC), Baxterthey
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in >>>news:66006d63$0$876051$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utphkk$eikh$1@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:49200jta9t047a6e3su01h8o4fc69t1s4f@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxter_spamblock@baxcode.com
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:65ff0cb0$1$4195 >>>>> >>$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02
<George@Foo.invalid>says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO
wrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing
himteach
dressis that if you are male you are female and you need to wear >>>>> >>>> >> >a
and make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let
fragile?home
toschool. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be
women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools you >>>>> >>>> went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so
A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger roles
have swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Surgery has advanced in those millenia. But think about it - back
then, 3 sexes = male, female, castrati
What advance? You sew a dick on a woman, she's still a woman. Drill a
hole in the guy that just lost his dick and he's still a man.
Genetic sex and psycological gender don't always match.
Only one way to detirmine sex/gender... penis vs vagina.
Sex and gender are not the same thing.
And there are hermaphrodites.
On 3/24/2024 1:48 PM, Blue Lives Matter wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:37:49 -0000 (UTC), BaxterRegardless, castrati is not a third sex.
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:hpv00jd0fh55t224bn3q6282oba4608kba@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:23:21 -0000 (UTC), Baxtera
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:i6j00j1h6g8hk37v90j8psaj4ijr8fhgip@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 15:42:13 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>> news:49200jta9t047a6e3su01h8o4fc69t1s4f@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxter_spamblock@baxcode.com
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:65ff0cb0$1$4195 >>>>>>>>> $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02
<George@Foo.invalid>says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>, >>>>>>>>>>>> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO
wrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they >>>>>>> teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear
doesdress
toand make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let him >>>>>>> home
school. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be >>>>>>>>>>>> women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools you >>>>>>>>>>> went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so fragile? >>>>>>>>>>A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger roles >>>>>>>>> have swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Surgery has advanced in those millenia. But think about it - back >>>>>>> then, 3 sexes = male, female, castrati
So, I guess you understand that cutting off a man's genitals doesn't >>>>>> change him into a woman. Of course if he does it voluntarily, it
becauseturn him into a freak, well, no, actually, he's a freak simply
he considers doing it.
What part of "3 sexes" did you not understand?
4... Male, female, ????, and freak..
So you think all castrati were "freaks"?!!
Can't you read? I said he's a freak if he does it voluntarily.
Otherwise, he's a victim.
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote in
news:Qj4MN.586185$c3Ea.372389@fx10.iad:
Contrary to the oft-heard mantra, gender is NOT a social construct.
==============
Gender refers to the characteristics of women, men, girls and boys that are >socially constructed. This includes norms, behaviours and roles associated >with being a woman, man, girl or boy, as well as relationships with each >other. As a social construct, gender varies from society to society and can >change over time.
https://www.who.int/health-topics/gender
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >news:vb010jlp0j41i6vk6fniqamv4gdb5316ed@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:37:49 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>news:hpv00jd0fh55t224bn3q6282oba4608kba@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:23:21 -0000 (UTC), Baxtera
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>news:i6j00j1h6g8hk37v90j8psaj4ijr8fhgip@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 15:42:13 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>>news:49200jta9t047a6e3su01h8o4fc69t1s4f@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxterteach
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>>news:65ff0cb0$1$4195 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02 >>>>>>>_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>, >>>>>>>>>>> > governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO >>>>>>><George@Foo.invalid>
wrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing >>>>>>>>>>> >> >they
is that if you are male you are female and you need to >>>>>>>>>>> >> >wear
doeshomedress
and make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let >>>>>>>>>>> > him
toschool. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be >>>>>>>>>>> > women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools >>>>>>>>>>> you went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so
fragile?
A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger roles >>>>>>>>>have swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Surgery has advanced in those millenia. But think about it - back >>>>>>>then, 3 sexes = male, female, castrati
So, I guess you understand that cutting off a man's genitals
doesn't change him into a woman. Of course if he does it
voluntarily, it
turn him into a freak, well, no, actually, he's a freak simply >>>because
he considers doing it.
What part of "3 sexes" did you not understand?
4... Male, female, ????, and freak..
So you think all castrati were "freaks"?!!
Can't you read? I said he's a freak if he does it voluntarily.
Otherwise, he's a victim.
Maybe in this culture, but not necessarily in every culture.
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >news:3u010jlv5095e1unstftm83hkajov9ar20@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:40:30 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in >>>news:66006d63$0$876051$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utphkk$eikh$1@dont-email.me>,
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:49200jta9t047a6e3su01h8o4fc69t1s4f@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxter_spamblock@baxcode.com
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65ff0cb0$1$4195 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02
<George@Foo.invalid>says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO
teachwrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing
they
homedressis that if you are male you are female and you need to
wear a
and make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let
him
toschool. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be
women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools
you went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so
fragile?
A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger roles
have swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Surgery has advanced in those millenia. But think about it - back
then, 3 sexes = male, female, castrati
What advance? You sew a dick on a woman, she's still a woman. Drill
a hole in the guy that just lost his dick and he's still a man.
And what about those born with both dick and vagina? Or neither dick
nor vagina?
Same as people with two heads.....
Nope
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abby_and_Brittany_Hensel
Far more people with both dick and vagina.
Mother Nature is not a bigot like you.
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 08:53:39 -0400, Yak <yak@inbox.com> wrote:
On 3/24/2024 8:46 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Sat, 23 Mar 2024 13:57:42 -0600, Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote:
We should take the federal government out of schools. According to
the Constitution it doesn't belong there.
Where does the Constitution forbid the Federal Government from participating in Education?
Oh dear God, another one who thinks govt is free to do as it wishes
unless it's forbidden by the constitution.
That's because it is, dummy. If the Constitution doesn't expressly forbid it, government
can do it.
How many states would gladly give up all Federal education money in order to comply with
your version of the C?
<noticing how you ignored this part>
Swill
Voice of Authority <privatemail@protonmail.com> wrote in news:utkl9s$33g89$1@dont-email.me:
Eight states offer all students,
regardless of household income,
free school meals - and more
states are trending in the
direction. But while people across
the country move to feed school
children, congressional Republicans
are looking to stop the cause.
The budget - co-signed by more
than 170 House Republicans - calls
to eliminate "the Community
Eligibility Provision (CEP) from
the School Lunch Program." The CEP,
the Republicans note, "allows
certain schools to provide free
school lunches regardless of the
individual eligibility of each
student."
https://theintercept.com/2024/03/21/house-republicans-ban-universal-sch
o ol-lunches/
I'm surprised they haven't passed laws prohibiting children from
attending school because an educated citizen won't vote for them.
Most say they'd better hand some tax cuts over to rich people or
they'll move to Saudi Arabia where they're are no taxes.
Donald Trump still king of the 'poorly educated'
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/sep/29/donald-trump-still-kin
g- poorly-educated/
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public Schools of
any ability to actually educate, fund those private schools that indoctrinate.
lloyd <lloyd@demon.net> wrote in news:utl8jt$3avdt$2@news.mixmin.net:
On 22 Mar 2024, GEO <George@Foo.invalid> posted some
news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public
Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private
schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a dress
and make up.
Ain't that the truth? Especially in Oregon.
School vouchers be like:
'I don't like the public parks, so I want my kid to go to the Country Club
to play - and I want the Public Parks to pay for it.' 'oh! and I want my property taxes reduced by not paying for those public parks.'
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:65feddae$0$6401$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utlg6s$3d8um$3@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...
lloyd <lloyd@demon.net> wrote in news:utl8jt$3avdt$2@news.mixmin.net:
On 22 Mar 2024, GEO <George@Foo.invalid> posted some
news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public
Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private
schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a
dress and make up.
Ain't that the truth? Especially in Oregon.
School vouchers be like:
'I don't like the public parks, so I want my kid to go to the Country
Club to play - and I want the Public Parks to pay for it.' 'oh! and
I want my property taxes reduced by not paying for those public
parks.'
Who said that? Why did they take trade classes out of the schools?
What part of "School vouchers be like:" did you not understand?
In article <utmpuu$3mj2s$2@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddae$0$6401$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utlg6s$3d8um$3@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...
lloyd <lloyd@demon.net> wrote in news:utl8jt$3avdt$2@news.mixmin.net:
On 22 Mar 2024, GEO <George@Foo.invalid> posted some
news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public
Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private
schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a
dress and make up.
Ain't that the truth? Especially in Oregon.
School vouchers be like:
'I don't like the public parks, so I want my kid to go to the Country
Club to play - and I want the Public Parks to pay for it.' 'oh! and
I want my property taxes reduced by not paying for those public
parks.'
Who said that? Why did they take trade classes out of the schools?
What part of "School vouchers be like:" did you not understand?
Why didn't you answer the question?
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:65ff0c88$0$4188 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmpuu$3mj2s$2@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddae$0$6401$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utlg6s$3d8um$3@dont-email.me>, bax02
@news.mixmin.net:says...
lloyd <lloyd@demon.net> wrote in news:utl8jt$3avdt$2
teach
On 22 Mar 2024, GEO <George@Foo.invalid> posted some
news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public
Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private
schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they
Countryis that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a
dress and make up.
Ain't that the truth? Especially in Oregon.
School vouchers be like:
'I don't like the public parks, so I want my kid to go to the
andClub to play - and I want the Public Parks to pay for it.' 'oh!
I want my property taxes reduced by not paying for those public
parks.'
Who said that? Why did they take trade classes out of the schools?
What part of "School vouchers be like:" did you not understand?
Why didn't you answer the question?
What?! Are you trying to change the subject? Asking about Trade classe? Trade Classes are now in Community Colleges - the High Schools have been stripped of funding.
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote in
news:VuGLN.723169$p%Mb.330709@fx15.iad:
On 3/23/2024 7:48 AM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <utlg6s$3d8um$3@dont-email.me>,We should take the federal government out of schools. According to
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
lloyd <lloyd@demon.net> wrote in
news:utl8jt$3avdt$2@news.mixmin.net:
On 22 Mar 2024, GEO <George@Foo.invalid> posted some
news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public
Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private
schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they teach >>>>>> is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a
dress and make up.
Ain't that the truth? Especially in Oregon.
School vouchers be like:
'I don't like the public parks, so I want my kid to go to the
Country Club to play - and I want the Public Parks to pay for it.'
'oh! and I want my property taxes reduced by not paying for those
public parks.'
Who said that? Why did they take trade classes out of the schools?
the Constitution it doesn't belong there.
Where in the Constitution does it say anything about schools?
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:02:54 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote in
news:VuGLN.723169$p%Mb.330709@fx15.iad:
On 3/23/2024 7:48 AM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <utlg6s$3d8um$3@dont-email.me>,We should take the federal government out of schools. According to
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
lloyd <lloyd@demon.net> wrote in
news:utl8jt$3avdt$2@news.mixmin.net:
On 22 Mar 2024, GEO <George@Foo.invalid> posted some
news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public >>>>>>>> Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private >>>>>>>> schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they teach >>>>>>> is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a
dress and make up.
Ain't that the truth? Especially in Oregon.
School vouchers be like:
'I don't like the public parks, so I want my kid to go to the
Country Club to play - and I want the Public Parks to pay for it.'
'oh! and I want my property taxes reduced by not paying for those
public parks.'
Who said that? Why did they take trade classes out of the schools?
the Constitution it doesn't belong there.
Where in the Constitution does it say anything about schools?
Nowhere, Dummy, that's the point
In article <94n10j1rm6md8mr1iepq47o18klapaj4o8@4ax.com>, governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 07:08:42 -0400, Blue Lives Matter
<Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:02:54 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote in
news:VuGLN.723169$p%Mb.330709@fx15.iad:
On 3/23/2024 7:48 AM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <utlg6s$3d8um$3@dont-email.me>,We should take the federal government out of schools. According to
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
lloyd <lloyd@demon.net> wrote in
news:utl8jt$3avdt$2@news.mixmin.net:
On 22 Mar 2024, GEO <George@Foo.invalid> posted some
news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public
Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private
schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they
teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a
dress and make up.
Ain't that the truth? Especially in Oregon.
School vouchers be like:
'I don't like the public parks, so I want my kid to go to the
Country Club to play - and I want the Public Parks to pay for it.'
'oh! and I want my property taxes reduced by not paying for those
public parks.'
Who said that? Why did they take trade classes out of the schools?
the Constitution it doesn't belong there.
Where in the Constitution does it say anything about schools?
Nowhere, Dummy, that's the point
Then there's no reason for the Federal government to not participate in
schools since
isn't forbidden.
Swill
That's why I pulled my son from public school.
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:17:28 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 3/24/2024 7:08 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 07:08:42 -0400, Blue Lives Matter
<Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:02:54 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote in
news:VuGLN.723169$p%Mb.330709@fx15.iad:
On 3/23/2024 7:48 AM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <utlg6s$3d8um$3@dont-email.me>,We should take the federal government out of schools. According to >>>>>> the Constitution it doesn't belong there.
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
lloyd <lloyd@demon.net> wrote in
news:utl8jt$3avdt$2@news.mixmin.net:
On 22 Mar 2024, GEO <George@Foo.invalid> posted some
news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public >>>>>>>>>>> Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private >>>>>>>>>>> schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they >>>>>>>>>> teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a >>>>>>>>>> dress and make up.
Ain't that the truth? Especially in Oregon.
School vouchers be like:
'I don't like the public parks, so I want my kid to go to the
Country Club to play - and I want the Public Parks to pay for it.' >>>>>>>> 'oh! and I want my property taxes reduced by not paying for those >>>>>>>> public parks.'
Who said that? Why did they take trade classes out of the schools? >>>>>>>
Where in the Constitution does it say anything about schools?
Nowhere, Dummy, that's the point
Then there's no reason for the Federal government to not participate in
schools since
isn't forbidden.
That's not the way federalism works. Congressional legislation must be >>authorized by a power delineated in Article I (as well as not prohibited
by something like the First Amendment).
In this case, funding schools is authorized by the Taxing Clause in
Article I.
On 3/24/2024 8:46 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Sat, 23 Mar 2024 13:57:42 -0600, Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote:
We should take the federal government out of schools. According to
the Constitution it doesn't belong there.
Where does the Constitution forbid the Federal Government from
participating in Education?
Oh dear God, another one who thinks govt is free to do as it wishes unless it's forbidden by the constitution.
How many states would gladly give up all Federal education money in order
to comply with
your version of the C?
In article <o0800j14ctedjkbv7kk9cf7n9s0alna57h@4ax.com>, governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Sat, 23 Mar 2024 13:57:42 -0600, Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote:
We should take the federal government out of schools. According to
the Constitution it doesn't belong there.
Where does the Constitution forbid the Federal Government from
participating in Education?
How many states would gladly give up all Federal education money in order
to comply with
your version of the C?
Like black male? Do it our way or lose the funding?
GEO <George@Foo.invalid> wrote in news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public
Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private
schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a dress
and make up.
More conservaturd propaganda.
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:65ff0cb0$1$4195 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.comdress
says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO <George@Foo.invalid>
wrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a
toand make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let him home
school. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools you went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so fragile?
A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger roles have
swapped for thousands of years.
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in news:49200jta9t047a6e3su01h8o4fc69t1s4f@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxter_spamblock@baxcode.com
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:65ff0cb0$1$4195 >>>$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02
<George@Foo.invalid>says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO
teachwrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they
homeis that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a >>>dress
and make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let him
school. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools you went >>>to
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so fragile?
A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger roles have >>>swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Surgery has advanced in those millenia.
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in news:i6j00j1h6g8hk37v90j8psaj4ijr8fhgip@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 15:42:13 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>news:49200jta9t047a6e3su01h8o4fc69t1s4f@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:65ff0cb0$1$4195 >>>>>$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02 >>>_spamblock@baxcode.comto
says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO >>><George@Foo.invalid>
wrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they >>>teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a >>>>>dress
and make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let him >>>home
school. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be
women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools you
went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so fragile?
A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger roles
have swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Surgery has advanced in those millenia. But think about it - back
then, 3 sexes = male, female, castrati
So, I guess you understand that cutting off a man's genitals doesn't
change him into a woman. Of course if he does it voluntarily, it does
turn him into a freak, well, no, actually, he's a freak simply because
he considers doing it.
What part of "3 sexes" did you not understand?
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in news:hpv00jd0fh55t224bn3q6282oba4608kba@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:23:21 -0000 (UTC), Baxtera
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>news:i6j00j1h6g8hk37v90j8psaj4ijr8fhgip@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 15:42:13 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>news:49200jta9t047a6e3su01h8o4fc69t1s4f@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:65ff0cb0$1$4195 >>>>>>>$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02 >>>>>_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO >>>>><George@Foo.invalid>
wrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they >>>>>teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear
doesdress
toand make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let him >>>>>home
school. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be
women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools you >>>>>>>>> went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so fragile? >>>>>>>>A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger roles >>>>>>>have swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Surgery has advanced in those millenia. But think about it - back >>>>>then, 3 sexes = male, female, castrati
So, I guess you understand that cutting off a man's genitals doesn't
change him into a woman. Of course if he does it voluntarily, it
becauseturn him into a freak, well, no, actually, he's a freak simply
he considers doing it.
What part of "3 sexes" did you not understand?
4... Male, female, ????, and freak..
So you think all castrati were "freaks"?!!
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 03:17:29 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>news:vb010jlp0j41i6vk6fniqamv4gdb5316ed@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:37:49 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>news:hpv00jd0fh55t224bn3q6282oba4608kba@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:23:21 -0000 (UTC), Baxtera
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>news:i6j00j1h6g8hk37v90j8psaj4ijr8fhgip@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 15:42:13 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>>>news:49200jta9t047a6e3su01h8o4fc69t1s4f@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxterteach
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>news:65ff0cb0$1$4195 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02 >>>>>>>>_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>, >>>>>>>>>>>> > governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO >>>>>>>><George@Foo.invalid>
wrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >they
is that if you are male you are female and you need to >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >wear
doeshomedress
and make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let >>>>>>>>>>>> > him
toschool. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be >>>>>>>>>>>> > women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools >>>>>>>>>>>> you went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so >>>>>>>>>>>> fragile?
A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger roles >>>>>>>>>>have swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Surgery has advanced in those millenia. But think about it - back >>>>>>>>then, 3 sexes = male, female, castrati
So, I guess you understand that cutting off a man's genitals
doesn't change him into a woman. Of course if he does it
voluntarily, it
turn him into a freak, well, no, actually, he's a freak simply >>>>because
he considers doing it.
What part of "3 sexes" did you not understand?
4... Male, female, ????, and freak..
So you think all castrati were "freaks"?!!
Can't you read? I said he's a freak if he does it voluntarily.
Otherwise, he's a victim.
Maybe in this culture, but not necessarily in every culture.
Oh I know there are strange cultures with strange beliefs. Some
cultures believe that people should put societal well being ahead of
their individual well being. That's one I never understood.
In article <utpvec$hrdc$6@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:hpv00jd0fh55t224bn3q6282oba4608kba@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:23:21 -0000 (UTC), Baxtera
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:i6j00j1h6g8hk37v90j8psaj4ijr8fhgip@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 15:42:13 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:49200jta9t047a6e3su01h8o4fc69t1s4f@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxter_spamblock@baxcode.com
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:65ff0cb0$1$4195
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02
<George@Foo.invalid>says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO
teachwrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they
is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear
doeshomedress
and make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let him
toschool. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be
women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools you
went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so fragile?
A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger roles
have swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Surgery has advanced in those millenia. But think about it - back
then, 3 sexes = male, female, castrati
So, I guess you understand that cutting off a man's genitals doesn't
change him into a woman. Of course if he does it voluntarily, it
becauseturn him into a freak, well, no, actually, he's a freak simply
he considers doing it.
What part of "3 sexes" did you not understand?
4... Male, female, ????, and freak..
So you think all castrati were "freaks"?!! The people at the time didn't
think so. Often they had important jobs - like singers (opera. choir),
haram guards/attendants, etc
==========
Over the millennia since, they have performed a wide variety of functions
in many different cultures: courtiers or equivalent domestics, for
espionage or clandestine operations, castrato singers, concubines or
sexual partners, religious specialists, soldiers, royal guards,
government officials, and guardians of women or harem servants.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castrato
Maybe you should look what year it is.
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:66006d63$0$876051$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utphkk$eikh$1@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:49200jta9t047a6e3su01h8o4fc69t1s4f@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxter_spamblock@baxcode.com
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:65ff0cb0$1$4195
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02
<George@Foo.invalid>says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO
teachwrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they
homedressis that if you are male you are female and you need to wear
a
and make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let him
toschool. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be
women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools you
went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so fragile?
A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger roles
have swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Surgery has advanced in those millenia. But think about it - back
then, 3 sexes = male, female, castrati
What advance? You sew a dick on a woman, she's still a woman. Drill a
hole in the guy that just lost his dick and he's still a man.
Genetic sex and psycological gender don't always match.
"max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in news:utmqo3$3mrti$2@dont-email.me:
In news:utkqo8$34tj5$3@dont-email.me, BaxterYou know god-damned well that's a lie
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public
Schools of any ability to actually educate,...
That ship sailed long ago. How do vouchers make any difference?
... fund those private schools that indoctrinate.
As if government schools don't.
"max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in news:utpq3c$gn8a$2@dont-email.me:
In news:uto3ka$96f$1@dont-email.me, BaxterHooNoo?!! Reading, 'Riting and 'Rithmatic are "indoctrination".
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
"max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in
news:utmqo3$3mrti$2@dont-email.me:
In news:utkqo8$34tj5$3@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public
Schools of any ability to actually educate,...
That ship sailed long ago. How do vouchers make any difference?
... fund those private schools that indoctrinate.
As if government schools don't.
You know god-damned well that's a lie
Wrong again, Leroy.
"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message news:65ff0c88$0$4188$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
In article <utmpuu$3mj2s$2@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddae$0$6401$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utlg6s$3d8um$3@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com >> > says...
lloyd <lloyd@demon.net> wrote in news:utl8jt$3avdt$2@news.mixmin.net: >> >>
On 22 Mar 2024, GEO <George@Foo.invalid> posted some
news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public
Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private
schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they teach >> >> >> is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a
dress and make up.
Ain't that the truth? Especially in Oregon.
School vouchers be like:
'I don't like the public parks, so I want my kid to go to the Country >> >> Club to play - and I want the Public Parks to pay for it.' 'oh! and
I want my property taxes reduced by not paying for those public
parks.'
Who said that? Why did they take trade classes out of the schools?
What part of "School vouchers be like:" did you not understand?
Why didn't you answer the question?
Because any answer he could provide would destroy his own argument?
"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message news:66008d14$0$2187650$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
In article <utpvec$hrdc$6@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:hpv00jd0fh55t224bn3q6282oba4608kba@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:23:21 -0000 (UTC), Baxterdoes
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:i6j00j1h6g8hk37v90j8psaj4ijr8fhgip@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 15:42:13 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:49200jta9t047a6e3su01h8o4fc69t1s4f@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxter_spamblock@baxcode.com
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:65ff0cb0$1$4195 >> >>>>>>$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02
<George@Foo.invalid>says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO
dresswrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they >> >>>>teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear >> a
toand make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let him >> >>>>home
school. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be
women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools you >> >>>>>>>> went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so fragile? >> >>>>>>>A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger roles
have swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Surgery has advanced in those millenia. But think about it - back
then, 3 sexes = male, female, castrati
So, I guess you understand that cutting off a man's genitals doesn't >> >>> change him into a woman. Of course if he does it voluntarily, it
becauseturn him into a freak, well, no, actually, he's a freak simply
he considers doing it.
What part of "3 sexes" did you not understand?
4... Male, female, ????, and freak..
So you think all castrati were "freaks"?!! The people at the time didn't >> think so. Often they had important jobs - like singers (opera. choir),
haram guards/attendants, etc
==========
Over the millennia since, they have performed a wide variety of functions >> in many different cultures: courtiers or equivalent domestics, for
espionage or clandestine operations, castrato singers, concubines or
sexual partners, religious specialists, soldiers, royal guards,
government officials, and guardians of women or harem servants.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castrato
Maybe you should look what year it is.
I suggest that we castrate Baxter just so he can demonstrate it's normalcy.
I mean as an advocate.... he should be all for it.
Right?
In article <94n10j1rm6md8mr1iepq47o18klapaj4o8@4ax.com>, governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 07:08:42 -0400, Blue Lives Matter
<Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:02:54 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote in
news:VuGLN.723169$p%Mb.330709@fx15.iad:
On 3/23/2024 7:48 AM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <utlg6s$3d8um$3@dont-email.me>,We should take the federal government out of schools. According
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
lloyd <lloyd@demon.net> wrote in
news:utl8jt$3avdt$2@news.mixmin.net:
On 22 Mar 2024, GEO <George@Foo.invalid> posted some
news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the
Public Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund
those private schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they
teach is that if you are male you are female and you need to
wear a dress and make up.
Ain't that the truth? Especially in Oregon.
School vouchers be like:
'I don't like the public parks, so I want my kid to go to the
Country Club to play - and I want the Public Parks to pay for
it.' 'oh! and I want my property taxes reduced by not paying
for those public parks.'
Who said that? Why did they take trade classes out of the
schools?
to the Constitution it doesn't belong there.
Where in the Constitution does it say anything about schools?
Nowhere, Dummy, that's the point
Then there's no reason for the Federal government to not participate
in schools since isn't forbidden.
Swill
That's why I pulled my son from public school.
In article <utqq8f$rpit$1@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:j4010jhrpf5bu0o791lo9lhf27krttsb6p@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:31:58 -0000 (UTC), Baxterthey
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:66006d63$0$876051$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utphkk$eikh$1@dont-email.me>,
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:49200jta9t047a6e3su01h8o4fc69t1s4f@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxter_spamblock@baxcode.com
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65ff0cb0$1$4195 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02
<George@Foo.invalid>says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO
wrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing
himteach
dressis that if you are male you are female and you need to
wear a
and make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and
let
fragile?home
toschool. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be
women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools
you went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so
A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger
roles have swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Surgery has advanced in those millenia. But think about it -
back then, 3 sexes = male, female, castrati
What advance? You sew a dick on a woman, she's still a woman.
Drill a hole in the guy that just lost his dick and he's still a
man.
Genetic sex and psycological gender don't always match.
Only one way to detirmine sex/gender... penis vs vagina.
Sex and gender are not the same thing. And there are hermaphrodites.
That still doesn't allow a faggot to use the girls room.
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:21:38 -0600, Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote:
On 3/24/2024 1:48 PM, Blue Lives Matter wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:37:49 -0000 (UTC), BaxterRegardless, castrati is not a third sex.
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:hpv00jd0fh55t224bn3q6282oba4608kba@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:23:21 -0000 (UTC), Baxtera
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:i6j00j1h6g8hk37v90j8psaj4ijr8fhgip@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 15:42:13 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote
in news:49200jta9t047a6e3su01h8o4fc69t1s4f@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxter_spamblock@baxcode.com
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65ff0cb0$1$4195 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02
<George@Foo.invalid>says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>, >>>>>>>>>>>>> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO
teachwrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they
is that if you are male you are female and you need to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wear
doeshomedress
and make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let >>>>>>>>>>>>> him
toschool. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be >>>>>>>>>>>>> women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools >>>>>>>>>>>> you went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so >>>>>>>>>>>> fragile?
A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger >>>>>>>>>> roles have swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Surgery has advanced in those millenia. But think about it -
back then, 3 sexes = male, female, castrati
So, I guess you understand that cutting off a man's genitals
doesn't change him into a woman. Of course if he does it
voluntarily, it
becauseturn him into a freak, well, no, actually, he's a freak simply
he considers doing it.
What part of "3 sexes" did you not understand?
4... Male, female, ????, and freak..
So you think all castrati were "freaks"?!!
Can't you read? I said he's a freak if he does it voluntarily.
Otherwise, he's a victim.
I know, I'm just having fun with the leftyloons.
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 03:15:28 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>news:j4010jhrpf5bu0o791lo9lhf27krttsb6p@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:31:58 -0000 (UTC), Baxterthey
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in >>>>news:66006d63$0$876051$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utphkk$eikh$1@dont-email.me>,
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:49200jta9t047a6e3su01h8o4fc69t1s4f@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxter_spamblock@baxcode.com
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65ff0cb0$1$4195 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02
<George@Foo.invalid>says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO
wrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing
himteach
dressis that if you are male you are female and you need to
wear a
and make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let
fragile?home
toschool. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be
women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools
you went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so
A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger
roles have swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Surgery has advanced in those millenia. But think about it - back
then, 3 sexes = male, female, castrati
What advance? You sew a dick on a woman, she's still a woman.
Drill a hole in the guy that just lost his dick and he's still a
man.
Genetic sex and psycological gender don't always match.
Only one way to detirmine sex/gender... penis vs vagina.
Sex and gender are not the same thing.
Yes they are....
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 03:17:29 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:roles
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>news:vb010jlp0j41i6vk6fniqamv4gdb5316ed@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:37:49 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>news:hpv00jd0fh55t224bn3q6282oba4608kba@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:23:21 -0000 (UTC), Baxtera
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>news:i6j00j1h6g8hk37v90j8psaj4ijr8fhgip@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 15:42:13 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>>>news:49200jta9t047a6e3su01h8o4fc69t1s4f@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxterteach
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>news:65ff0cb0$1$4195 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02 >>>>>>>>_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>, >>>>>>>>>>>> > governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO >>>>>>>><George@Foo.invalid>
wrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >they
is that if you are male you are female and you need to >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >wear
homedress
and make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let >>>>>>>>>>>> > him
toschool. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be >>>>>>>>>>>> > women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools >>>>>>>>>>>> you went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so >>>>>>>>>>>> fragile?
A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger
doeshave swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Surgery has advanced in those millenia. But think about it - back >>>>>>>>then, 3 sexes = male, female, castrati
So, I guess you understand that cutting off a man's genitals
doesn't change him into a woman. Of course if he does it
voluntarily, it
turn him into a freak, well, no, actually, he's a freak simply >>>>because
he considers doing it.
What part of "3 sexes" did you not understand?
4... Male, female, ????, and freak..
So you think all castrati were "freaks"?!!
Can't you read? I said he's a freak if he does it voluntarily.
Otherwise, he's a victim.
Maybe in this culture, but not necessarily in every culture.
Oh I know there are strange cultures with strange beliefs. Some
cultures believe that people should put societal well being ahead of
their individual well being. That's one I never understood.
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 03:20:02 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>news:3u010jlv5095e1unstftm83hkajov9ar20@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:40:30 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in >>>>news:66006d63$0$876051$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utphkk$eikh$1@dont-email.me>,
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:49200jta9t047a6e3su01h8o4fc69t1s4f@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxter_spamblock@baxcode.com
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65ff0cb0$1$4195 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02
<George@Foo.invalid>says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO
teachwrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing
they
homedressis that if you are male you are female and you need to
wear a
and make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let
him
toschool. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be
women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools
you went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so
fragile?
A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger roles >>>>>> >>have swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Surgery has advanced in those millenia. But think about it - back
then, 3 sexes = male, female, castrati
What advance? You sew a dick on a woman, she's still a woman. Drill
a hole in the guy that just lost his dick and he's still a man.
And what about those born with both dick and vagina? Or neither dick >>>>nor vagina?
Same as people with two heads.....
Nope
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abby_and_Brittany_Hensel
Far more people with both dick and vagina.
So, how many?
Where in the Constitution does it say anything about schools?
Nowhere, Dummy, that's the point
Then there's no reason for the Federal government to not participate
in schools since
isn't forbidden.
That's not the way federalism works. Congressional legislation must be
authorized by a power delineated in Article I (as well as not prohibited >>> by something like the First Amendment).
In this case, funding schools is authorized by the Taxing Clause in
Article I.
Sorry, but I don't see anything in Article I that gives the federal government any power to collect or spend money on education other than
some specific militia education. If you're going to hang your hat on
that.. then I expect every shoot to teach schooling and have a rifle range.
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:660120fc$0$876045$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <94n10j1rm6md8mr1iepq47o18klapaj4o8@4ax.com>, governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 07:08:42 -0400, Blue Lives Matter
<Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:02:54 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote in
news:VuGLN.723169$p%Mb.330709@fx15.iad:
On 3/23/2024 7:48 AM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <utlg6s$3d8um$3@dont-email.me>,We should take the federal government out of schools. According
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
lloyd <lloyd@demon.net> wrote in
news:utl8jt$3avdt$2@news.mixmin.net:
On 22 Mar 2024, GEO <George@Foo.invalid> posted some
news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the
Public Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund
those private schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they
teach is that if you are male you are female and you need to
wear a dress and make up.
Ain't that the truth? Especially in Oregon.
School vouchers be like:
'I don't like the public parks, so I want my kid to go to the
Country Club to play - and I want the Public Parks to pay for
it.' 'oh! and I want my property taxes reduced by not paying
for those public parks.'
Who said that? Why did they take trade classes out of the
schools?
to the Constitution it doesn't belong there.
Where in the Constitution does it say anything about schools?
Nowhere, Dummy, that's the point
Then there's no reason for the Federal government to not participate
in schools since isn't forbidden.
Swill
That's why I pulled my son from public school.
Yeah, you didn't want your kid to associate with "those kids".
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in news:dof20jlqbqhmq7qum9ai8een2832h5g75k@4ax.com:
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 03:15:28 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>news:j4010jhrpf5bu0o791lo9lhf27krttsb6p@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:31:58 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in >>>>news:66006d63$0$876051$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utphkk$eikh$1@dont-email.me>,
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>> news:49200jta9t047a6e3su01h8o4fc69t1s4f@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxter_spamblock@baxcode.com
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65ff0cb0$1$4195 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02
<George@Foo.invalid>says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO
teachwrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing >>they
homedressis that if you are male you are female and you need to
wear a
and make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let >>him
toschool. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be >>>>>> >>>> > women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools >>>>>> >>>> you went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so >>fragile?
A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger
roles have swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Surgery has advanced in those millenia. But think about it - back >>>>>> then, 3 sexes = male, female, castrati
What advance? You sew a dick on a woman, she's still a woman.
Drill a hole in the guy that just lost his dick and he's still a
man.
Genetic sex and psycological gender don't always match.
Only one way to detirmine sex/gender... penis vs vagina.
Sex and gender are not the same thing.
Yes they are....
No they are not.
===========
Sex is usually categorized as female or male but there is variation in
the biological attributes that comprise sex and how those attributes are expressed. Gender refers to the socially constructed roles, behaviours, expressions and identities of girls, women, boys, men, and gender diverse people.
https://cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/48642.html
=============
What do we mean by sex and gender? Aren?t these terms interchangeable? Perhaps at some point in time they were used as synonyms, but this is no longer true in science.
https://medicine.yale.edu/news-article/what-do-we-mean-by-sex-and-gender/
============
You're just a fucking, nuckle-dragging, anti-science reactionary.
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in news:sgf20jpmrdo4r6723unoen0mhv136kojno@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:21:38 -0600, Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote:
On 3/24/2024 1:48 PM, Blue Lives Matter wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:37:49 -0000 (UTC), BaxterRegardless, castrati is not a third sex.
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:hpv00jd0fh55t224bn3q6282oba4608kba@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:23:21 -0000 (UTC), Baxtera
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>> news:i6j00j1h6g8hk37v90j8psaj4ijr8fhgip@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 15:42:13 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote >>>>>>>> in news:49200jta9t047a6e3su01h8o4fc69t1s4f@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxter_spamblock@baxcode.com
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65ff0cb0$1$4195 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02
<George@Foo.invalid>says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>, >>>>>>>>>>>>> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO
teachwrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they
is that if you are male you are female and you need to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wear
doeshomedress
and make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let >>>>>>>>>>>>> him
toschool. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be >>>>>>>>>>>>> women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools >>>>>>>>>>>> you went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so >>>>>>>>>>>> fragile?
A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger >>>>>>>>>> roles have swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Surgery has advanced in those millenia. But think about it - >>>>>>>> back then, 3 sexes = male, female, castrati
So, I guess you understand that cutting off a man's genitals
doesn't change him into a woman. Of course if he does it
voluntarily, it
becauseturn him into a freak, well, no, actually, he's a freak simply
he considers doing it.
What part of "3 sexes" did you not understand?
4... Male, female, ????, and freak..
So you think all castrati were "freaks"?!!
Can't you read? I said he's a freak if he does it voluntarily.
Otherwise, he's a victim.
It's not a sex - it's a gender
I know, I'm just having fun with the leftyloons.
No, you're just flinging your shit at the walls like a monkey.
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >news:sgf20jpmrdo4r6723unoen0mhv136kojno@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:21:38 -0600, Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote:
On 3/24/2024 1:48 PM, Blue Lives Matter wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:37:49 -0000 (UTC), BaxterRegardless, castrati is not a third sex.
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:hpv00jd0fh55t224bn3q6282oba4608kba@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:23:21 -0000 (UTC), Baxtera
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>> news:i6j00j1h6g8hk37v90j8psaj4ijr8fhgip@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 15:42:13 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote >>>>>>>>> in news:49200jta9t047a6e3su01h8o4fc69t1s4f@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxter_spamblock@baxcode.com
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65ff0cb0$1$4195 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02
<George@Foo.invalid>says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO
teachwrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they
is that if you are male you are female and you need to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wear
doeshomedress
and make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let >>>>>>>>>>>>>> him
toschool. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be >>>>>>>>>>>>>> women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools >>>>>>>>>>>>> you went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so >>>>>>>>>>>>> fragile?
A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger >>>>>>>>>>> roles have swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Surgery has advanced in those millenia. But think about it - >>>>>>>>> back then, 3 sexes = male, female, castrati
So, I guess you understand that cutting off a man's genitals
doesn't change him into a woman. Of course if he does it
voluntarily, it
becauseturn him into a freak, well, no, actually, he's a freak simply
he considers doing it.
What part of "3 sexes" did you not understand?
4... Male, female, ????, and freak..
So you think all castrati were "freaks"?!!
Can't you read? I said he's a freak if he does it voluntarily.
Otherwise, he's a victim.
It's not a sex - it's a gender
I know, I'm just having fun with the leftyloons.No, you're just flinging your shit at the walls like a monkey.
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >news:dof20jlqbqhmq7qum9ai8een2832h5g75k@4ax.com:
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 03:15:28 -0000 (UTC), BaxterNo they are not.
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>news:j4010jhrpf5bu0o791lo9lhf27krttsb6p@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:31:58 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in >>>>>news:66006d63$0$876051$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utphkk$eikh$1@dont-email.me>,
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>> news:49200jta9t047a6e3su01h8o4fc69t1s4f@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxter_spamblock@baxcode.com
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65ff0cb0$1$4195 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02
<George@Foo.invalid>says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO
teachwrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing >>>they
homedressis that if you are male you are female and you need to
wear a
and make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let >>>him
toschool. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be >>>>>>> >>>> > women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools >>>>>>> >>>> you went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so >>>fragile?
A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger
roles have swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Surgery has advanced in those millenia. But think about it - back >>>>>>> then, 3 sexes = male, female, castrati
What advance? You sew a dick on a woman, she's still a woman.
Drill a hole in the guy that just lost his dick and he's still a
man.
Genetic sex and psycological gender don't always match.
Only one way to detirmine sex/gender... penis vs vagina.
Sex and gender are not the same thing.
Yes they are....
===========
Sex is usually categorized as female or male but there is variation in
the biological attributes that comprise sex and how those attributes are >expressed. Gender refers to the socially constructed roles, behaviours, >expressions and identities of girls, women, boys, men, and gender diverse >people.
https://cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/48642.html
=============
What do we mean by sex and gender? Aren’t these terms interchangeable? >Perhaps at some point in time they were used as synonyms, but this is no >longer true in science.
https://medicine.yale.edu/news-article/what-do-we-mean-by-sex-and-gender/
============
You're just a fucking, nuckle-dragging, anti-science reactionary.
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >news:9ii20jdiu4nlvqi92tmne4prcj52vef4ei@4ax.com:
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 03:20:02 -0000 (UTC), BaxterDoesn't matter how many - that they exist disproves your binary 'dick OR >vagina'.
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>news:3u010jlv5095e1unstftm83hkajov9ar20@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:40:30 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in >>>>>news:66006d63$0$876051$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utphkk$eikh$1@dont-email.me>,
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>> news:49200jta9t047a6e3su01h8o4fc69t1s4f@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxter_spamblock@baxcode.com
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65ff0cb0$1$4195 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02
<George@Foo.invalid>says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO
teachwrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing >>>>>>> >>>> >> >they
homedressis that if you are male you are female and you need to
wear a
and make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let >>>>>>> >>>> > him
toschool. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be >>>>>>> >>>> > women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools >>>>>>> >>>> you went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so
fragile?
A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger roles >>>>>>> >>have swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Surgery has advanced in those millenia. But think about it - back >>>>>>> then, 3 sexes = male, female, castrati
What advance? You sew a dick on a woman, she's still a woman. Drill >>>>>> a hole in the guy that just lost his dick and he's still a man.
And what about those born with both dick and vagina? Or neither dick >>>>>nor vagina?
Same as people with two heads.....
Nope
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abby_and_Brittany_Hensel
Far more people with both dick and vagina.
So, how many?
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >news:7ci20jd8jkc9d6m5g9hk1sv4cjl08pevv9@4ax.com:
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 03:17:29 -0000 (UTC), Baxterroles
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>news:vb010jlp0j41i6vk6fniqamv4gdb5316ed@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:37:49 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>news:hpv00jd0fh55t224bn3q6282oba4608kba@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:23:21 -0000 (UTC), Baxtera
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>>news:i6j00j1h6g8hk37v90j8psaj4ijr8fhgip@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 15:42:13 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>>>>news:49200jta9t047a6e3su01h8o4fc69t1s4f@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxterteach
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>news:65ff0cb0$1$4195 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02 >>>>>>>>>_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>, >>>>>>>>>>>>> > governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO >>>>>>>>><George@Foo.invalid>
wrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >they
is that if you are male you are female and you need to >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >wear
homedress
and make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let >>>>>>>>>>>>> > him
toschool. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be >>>>>>>>>>>>> > women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools >>>>>>>>>>>>> you went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so >>>>>>>>>>>>> fragile?
A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger
doeshave swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Surgery has advanced in those millenia. But think about it - back >>>>>>>>>then, 3 sexes = male, female, castrati
So, I guess you understand that cutting off a man's genitals
doesn't change him into a woman. Of course if he does it
voluntarily, it
turn him into a freak, well, no, actually, he's a freak simply >>>>>because
he considers doing it.
What part of "3 sexes" did you not understand?
4... Male, female, ????, and freak..
So you think all castrati were "freaks"?!!
Can't you read? I said he's a freak if he does it voluntarily.
Otherwise, he's a victim.
Maybe in this culture, but not necessarily in every culture.
Oh I know there are strange cultures with strange beliefs. Some
cultures believe that people should put societal well being ahead of
their individual well being. That's one I never understood.
Spock: "the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few".
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:660120fc$0$876045$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <94n10j1rm6md8mr1iepq47o18klapaj4o8@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 07:08:42 -0400, Blue Lives Matter
<Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:02:54 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote in
news:VuGLN.723169$p%Mb.330709@fx15.iad:
On 3/23/2024 7:48 AM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <utlg6s$3d8um$3@dont-email.me>,We should take the federal government out of schools. According
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
lloyd <lloyd@demon.net> wrote in
news:utl8jt$3avdt$2@news.mixmin.net:
On 22 Mar 2024, GEO <George@Foo.invalid> posted some
news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the
Public Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund
those private schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they
teach is that if you are male you are female and you need to
wear a dress and make up.
Ain't that the truth? Especially in Oregon.
School vouchers be like:
'I don't like the public parks, so I want my kid to go to the
Country Club to play - and I want the Public Parks to pay for
it.' 'oh! and I want my property taxes reduced by not paying
for those public parks.'
Who said that? Why did they take trade classes out of the
schools?
to the Constitution it doesn't belong there.
Where in the Constitution does it say anything about schools?
Nowhere, Dummy, that's the point
Then there's no reason for the Federal government to not participate
in schools since isn't forbidden.
Swill
That's why I pulled my son from public school.
Yeah, you didn't want your kid to associate with "those kids".
In article <uts30m$154gj$1@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:660120fc$0$876045$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <94n10j1rm6md8mr1iepq47o18klapaj4o8@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 07:08:42 -0400, Blue Lives Matter
<Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:02:54 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote in
news:VuGLN.723169$p%Mb.330709@fx15.iad:
On 3/23/2024 7:48 AM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <utlg6s$3d8um$3@dont-email.me>,We should take the federal government out of schools. According
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
lloyd <lloyd@demon.net> wrote in
news:utl8jt$3avdt$2@news.mixmin.net:
On 22 Mar 2024, GEO <George@Foo.invalid> posted some
news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the
Public Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund
those private schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they
teach is that if you are male you are female and you need to
wear a dress and make up.
Ain't that the truth? Especially in Oregon.
School vouchers be like:
'I don't like the public parks, so I want my kid to go to the
Country Club to play - and I want the Public Parks to pay for
it.' 'oh! and I want my property taxes reduced by not paying
for those public parks.'
Who said that? Why did they take trade classes out of the
schools?
to the Constitution it doesn't belong there.
Where in the Constitution does it say anything about schools?
Nowhere, Dummy, that's the point
Then there's no reason for the Federal government to not participate
in schools since isn't forbidden.
Swill
That's why I pulled my son from public school.
Yeah, you didn't want your kid to associate with "those kids".
There goes your well trained liberalism again. What do the other kids
have to do with it?
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in news:sgf20jpmrdo4r6723unoen0mhv136kojno@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:21:38 -0600, Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote:
On 3/24/2024 1:48 PM, Blue Lives Matter wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:37:49 -0000 (UTC), BaxterRegardless, castrati is not a third sex.
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:hpv00jd0fh55t224bn3q6282oba4608kba@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:23:21 -0000 (UTC), Baxtera
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>> news:i6j00j1h6g8hk37v90j8psaj4ijr8fhgip@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 15:42:13 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote >>>>>>>>> in news:49200jta9t047a6e3su01h8o4fc69t1s4f@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxter_spamblock@baxcode.com
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65ff0cb0$1$4195 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02
<George@Foo.invalid>says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO
teachwrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they
is that if you are male you are female and you need to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wear
doeshomedress
and make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let >>>>>>>>>>>>>> him
toschool. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be >>>>>>>>>>>>>> women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools >>>>>>>>>>>>> you went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so >>>>>>>>>>>>> fragile?
A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger >>>>>>>>>>> roles have swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Surgery has advanced in those millenia. But think about it - >>>>>>>>> back then, 3 sexes = male, female, castrati
So, I guess you understand that cutting off a man's genitals
doesn't change him into a woman. Of course if he does it
voluntarily, it
becauseturn him into a freak, well, no, actually, he's a freak simply
he considers doing it.
What part of "3 sexes" did you not understand?
4... Male, female, ????, and freak..
So you think all castrati were "freaks"?!!
Can't you read? I said he's a freak if he does it voluntarily.
Otherwise, he's a victim.
It's not a sex - it's a gender
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in news:dof20jlqbqhmq7qum9ai8een2832h5g75k@4ax.com:
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 03:15:28 -0000 (UTC), BaxterNo they are not.
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>news:j4010jhrpf5bu0o791lo9lhf27krttsb6p@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:31:58 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in >>>>>news:66006d63$0$876051$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utphkk$eikh$1@dont-email.me>,
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>> news:49200jta9t047a6e3su01h8o4fc69t1s4f@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxter_spamblock@baxcode.com
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65ff0cb0$1$4195 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02
<George@Foo.invalid>says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO
teachwrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing >>>they
homedressis that if you are male you are female and you need to
wear a
and make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let >>>him
toschool. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be >>>>>>> >>>> > women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools >>>>>>> >>>> you went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so >>>fragile?
A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger
roles have swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Surgery has advanced in those millenia. But think about it - back >>>>>>> then, 3 sexes = male, female, castrati
What advance? You sew a dick on a woman, she's still a woman.
Drill a hole in the guy that just lost his dick and he's still a
man.
Genetic sex and psycological gender don't always match.
Only one way to detirmine sex/gender... penis vs vagina.
Sex and gender are not the same thing.
Yes they are....
===========
Sex is usually categorized as female or male but there is variation in
the biological attributes that comprise sex and how those attributes are expressed. Gender refers to the socially constructed roles, behaviours, expressions and identities of girls, women, boys, men, and gender diverse people.
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in news:7ci20jd8jkc9d6m5g9hk1sv4cjl08pevv9@4ax.com:
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 03:17:29 -0000 (UTC), Baxterroles
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>news:vb010jlp0j41i6vk6fniqamv4gdb5316ed@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:37:49 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>news:hpv00jd0fh55t224bn3q6282oba4608kba@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:23:21 -0000 (UTC), Baxtera
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>>news:i6j00j1h6g8hk37v90j8psaj4ijr8fhgip@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 15:42:13 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>>>>news:49200jta9t047a6e3su01h8o4fc69t1s4f@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxterteach
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>news:65ff0cb0$1$4195 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02 >>>>>>>>>_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>, >>>>>>>>>>>>> > governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO >>>>>>>>><George@Foo.invalid>
wrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >they
is that if you are male you are female and you need to >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >wear
homedress
and make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let >>>>>>>>>>>>> > him
toschool. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be >>>>>>>>>>>>> > women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools >>>>>>>>>>>>> you went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so >>>>>>>>>>>>> fragile?
A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger
doeshave swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Surgery has advanced in those millenia. But think about it - back >>>>>>>>>then, 3 sexes = male, female, castrati
So, I guess you understand that cutting off a man's genitals
doesn't change him into a woman. Of course if he does it
voluntarily, it
turn him into a freak, well, no, actually, he's a freak simply >>>>>because
he considers doing it.
What part of "3 sexes" did you not understand?
4... Male, female, ????, and freak..
So you think all castrati were "freaks"?!!
Can't you read? I said he's a freak if he does it voluntarily.
Otherwise, he's a victim.
Maybe in this culture, but not necessarily in every culture.
Oh I know there are strange cultures with strange beliefs. Some
cultures believe that people should put societal well being ahead of
their individual well being. That's one I never understood.
Spock: "the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few".
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in news:9ii20jdiu4nlvqi92tmne4prcj52vef4ei@4ax.com:
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 03:20:02 -0000 (UTC), BaxterDoesn't matter how many - that they exist disproves your binary 'dick OR vagina'.
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>news:3u010jlv5095e1unstftm83hkajov9ar20@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:40:30 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in >>>>>news:66006d63$0$876051$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utphkk$eikh$1@dont-email.me>,
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>> news:49200jta9t047a6e3su01h8o4fc69t1s4f@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxter_spamblock@baxcode.com
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65ff0cb0$1$4195 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02
<George@Foo.invalid>says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO
teachwrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing >>>>>>> >>>> >> >they
homedressis that if you are male you are female and you need to
wear a
and make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let >>>>>>> >>>> > him
toschool. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be >>>>>>> >>>> > women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools >>>>>>> >>>> you went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so
fragile?
A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger roles >>>>>>> >>have swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Surgery has advanced in those millenia. But think about it - back >>>>>>> then, 3 sexes = male, female, castrati
What advance? You sew a dick on a woman, she's still a woman. Drill >>>>>> a hole in the guy that just lost his dick and he's still a man.
And what about those born with both dick and vagina? Or neither dick >>>>>nor vagina?
Same as people with two heads.....
Nope
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abby_and_Brittany_Hensel
Far more people with both dick and vagina.
So, how many?
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 14:53:31 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >news:sgf20jpmrdo4r6723unoen0mhv136kojno@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:21:38 -0600, Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote:
On 3/24/2024 1:48 PM, Blue Lives Matter wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:37:49 -0000 (UTC), BaxterRegardless, castrati is not a third sex.
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:hpv00jd0fh55t224bn3q6282oba4608kba@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:23:21 -0000 (UTC), Baxtera
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>> news:i6j00j1h6g8hk37v90j8psaj4ijr8fhgip@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 15:42:13 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote >>>>>>>>> in news:49200jta9t047a6e3su01h8o4fc69t1s4f@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxter_spamblock@baxcode.com
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65ff0cb0$1$4195 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02
<George@Foo.invalid>says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO
teachwrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they
is that if you are male you are female and you need to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wear
doeshomedress
and make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let >>>>>>>>>>>>>> him
toschool. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be >>>>>>>>>>>>>> women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools >>>>>>>>>>>>> you went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so >>>>>>>>>>>>> fragile?
A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger >>>>>>>>>>> roles have swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Surgery has advanced in those millenia. But think about it - >>>>>>>>> back then, 3 sexes = male, female, castrati
So, I guess you understand that cutting off a man's genitals >>>>>>>> doesn't change him into a woman. Of course if he does it
voluntarily, it
becauseturn him into a freak, well, no, actually, he's a freak simply
he considers doing it.
What part of "3 sexes" did you not understand?
4... Male, female, ????, and freak..
So you think all castrati were "freaks"?!!
Can't you read? I said he's a freak if he does it voluntarily.
Otherwise, he's a victim.
It's not a sex - it's a gender
It's neither...
I know, I'm just having fun with the leftyloons.No, you're just flinging your shit at the walls like a monkey.
Speaking of shit. I notice that Budwieser got shit on, and now Planet Fitness.
"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message news:660197bd$0$2077926$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
In article <uts30m$154gj$1@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:660120fc$0$876045$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <94n10j1rm6md8mr1iepq47o18klapaj4o8@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 07:08:42 -0400, Blue Lives Matter
<Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:02:54 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote in
news:VuGLN.723169$p%Mb.330709@fx15.iad:
On 3/23/2024 7:48 AM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <utlg6s$3d8um$3@dont-email.me>,We should take the federal government out of schools. According
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
lloyd <lloyd@demon.net> wrote in
news:utl8jt$3avdt$2@news.mixmin.net:
On 22 Mar 2024, GEO <George@Foo.invalid> posted some
news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the
Public Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund
those private schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they
teach is that if you are male you are female and you need to
wear a dress and make up.
Ain't that the truth? Especially in Oregon.
School vouchers be like:
'I don't like the public parks, so I want my kid to go to the
Country Club to play - and I want the Public Parks to pay for
it.' 'oh! and I want my property taxes reduced by not paying
for those public parks.'
Who said that? Why did they take trade classes out of the
schools?
to the Constitution it doesn't belong there.
Where in the Constitution does it say anything about schools?
Nowhere, Dummy, that's the point
Then there's no reason for the Federal government to not participate
in schools since isn't forbidden.
Swill
That's why I pulled my son from public school.
Yeah, you didn't want your kid to associate with "those kids".
There goes your well trained liberalism again. What do the other kids
have to do with it?
Haven't you realized.. doesn't matter how stupid it is.. with Democrats it's all about conformity.
If the other kids are jumping off a bridge... then you're suppose to do the same.
I mean they can't have anyone thinking for themselves, can they?
People might get this crazy notion that they know how to run their own
lives.
"max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in news:utpq3e$gn8a$3@dont-email.me:
In news:pu900jpq12i6q3nm5bgd7jgeusnr92kh95@4ax.com, Governor Swill
<governor.swill@gmail.com> typed:
On Sat, 23 Mar 2024 07:57:00 -0700, "max headroom" wrote:
In news:utkqo8$34tj5$3@dont-email.me, Baxter typed:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public
Schools of any ability to actually educate,...
That ship sailed long ago. How do vouchers make any difference?
... fund those private schools that indoctrinate.
As if government schools don't.
Really? What religion do they indoctrinate in?
Verb
indoctrinate (third-person singular simple present indoctrinates,
present participle indoctrinating, simple past and past
participle indoctrinated)
1.. To teach with a biased, one-sided or uncritical ideology; to
brainwash.
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/indoctrinate
Notice Max HeadFullOfShit doesn't even hint at what ideology he thinks
they are "brainwashing" in. ...
"max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in news:utpq3c$gn8a$2@dont-email.me:
In news:uto3ka$96f$1@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
"max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in
news:utmqo3$3mrti$2@dont-email.me:
In news:utkqo8$34tj5$3@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public
Schools of any ability to actually educate,...
That ship sailed long ago. How do vouchers make any difference?
... fund those private schools that indoctrinate.
As if government schools don't.
You know god-damned well that's a lie
Wrong again, Leroy.
HooNoo?!! Reading, 'Riting and 'Rithmatic are "indoctrination". ...
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 07:08:42 -0400, Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:02:54 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote in
news:VuGLN.723169$p%Mb.330709@fx15.iad:
On 3/23/2024 7:48 AM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <utlg6s$3d8um$3@dont-email.me>,We should take the federal government out of schools. According to
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
lloyd <lloyd@demon.net> wrote in
news:utl8jt$3avdt$2@news.mixmin.net:
On 22 Mar 2024, GEO <George@Foo.invalid> posted some
news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public >>>>>>>>> Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private >>>>>>>>> schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they teach >>>>>>>> is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a
dress and make up.
Ain't that the truth? Especially in Oregon.
School vouchers be like:
'I don't like the public parks, so I want my kid to go to the
Country Club to play - and I want the Public Parks to pay for it.' >>>>>> 'oh! and I want my property taxes reduced by not paying for those
public parks.'
Who said that? Why did they take trade classes out of the schools?
the Constitution it doesn't belong there.
Where in the Constitution does it say anything about schools?
Nowhere, Dummy, that's the point
Then there's no reason for the Federal government to not participate in schools since
isn't forbidden.
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 08:53:39 -0400, Yak <yak@inbox.com> wrote:
On 3/24/2024 8:46 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Sat, 23 Mar 2024 13:57:42 -0600, Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote:
We should take the federal government out of schools. According to
the Constitution it doesn't belong there.
Where does the Constitution forbid the Federal Government from participating in Education?
Oh dear God, another one who thinks govt is free to do as it wishes
unless it's forbidden by the constitution.
That's because it is, dummy. If the Constitution doesn't expressly forbid it, government
can do it.
funding schools is authorized by the Taxing Clause in Article I.
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in news:j4010jhrpf5bu0o791lo9lhf27krttsb6p@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:31:58 -0000 (UTC), Baxterthey
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:66006d63$0$876051$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utphkk$eikh$1@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:49200jta9t047a6e3su01h8o4fc69t1s4f@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxter_spamblock@baxcode.com
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:65ff0cb0$1$4195 >>>>>>> $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02
<George@Foo.invalid>says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO
wrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing
himteach
dressis that if you are male you are female and you need to wear >>>>>>>>>>>> a
and make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let
fragile?home
toschool. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be
women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools you >>>>>>>>> went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so
A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger roles >>>>>>> have swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Surgery has advanced in those millenia. But think about it - back
then, 3 sexes = male, female, castrati
What advance? You sew a dick on a woman, she's still a woman. Drill a
hole in the guy that just lost his dick and he's still a man.
Genetic sex and psycological gender don't always match.
Only one way to detirmine sex/gender... penis vs vagina.
Sex and gender are not the same thing.
And there are hermaphrodites.
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in news:3u010jlv5095e1unstftm83hkajov9ar20@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:40:30 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:66006d63$0$876051$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utphkk$eikh$1@dont-email.me>,
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:49200jta9t047a6e3su01h8o4fc69t1s4f@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxter_spamblock@baxcode.com
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65ff0cb0$1$4195 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02
<George@Foo.invalid>says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO
teachwrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing >>>>>>>>>>>> they
homedressis that if you are male you are female and you need to >>>>>>>>>>>> wear a
and make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let >>>>>>>>>> him
toschool. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be
women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools
you went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so
fragile?
A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger roles >>>>>>> have swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Surgery has advanced in those millenia. But think about it - back
then, 3 sexes = male, female, castrati
What advance? You sew a dick on a woman, she's still a woman. Drill
a hole in the guy that just lost his dick and he's still a man.
And what about those born with both dick and vagina? Or neither dick
nor vagina?
Same as people with two heads.....
Nope
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abby_and_Brittany_Hensel
Far more people with both dick and vagina.
On 3/24/2024 8:17 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
I'm sorry to learn you're that retarded.
funding schools is authorized by the Taxing Clause in Article I.
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote:
Contrary to the oft-heard mantra, gender is NOT a social construct.
==============
Gender refers to the characteristics of women, men, girls and boys that are socially constructed. This includes norms, behaviours and roles associated with being a woman, man, girl or boy, as well as relationships with each other. As a social construct, gender varies from society to society and can change over time.
https://www.who.int/health-topics/gender
On 3/24/2024 7:08 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 07:08:42 -0400, Blue Lives Matter
<Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:02:54 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote in
news:VuGLN.723169$p%Mb.330709@fx15.iad:
On 3/23/2024 7:48 AM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <utlg6s$3d8um$3@dont-email.me>,We should take the federal government out of schools. According to >>>>> the Constitution it doesn't belong there.
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
lloyd <lloyd@demon.net> wrote in
news:utl8jt$3avdt$2@news.mixmin.net:
On 22 Mar 2024, GEO <George@Foo.invalid> posted some
news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public >>>>>>>>>> Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private >>>>>>>>>> schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they teach >>>>>>>>> is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a >>>>>>>>> dress and make up.
Ain't that the truth? Especially in Oregon.
School vouchers be like:
'I don't like the public parks, so I want my kid to go to the
Country Club to play - and I want the Public Parks to pay for it.' >>>>>>> 'oh! and I want my property taxes reduced by not paying for those >>>>>>> public parks.'
Who said that? Why did they take trade classes out of the schools? >>>>>>
Where in the Constitution does it say anything about schools?
Nowhere, Dummy, that's the point
Then there's no reason for the Federal government to not participate in
schools since isn't forbidden.
That's not the way federalism works. Congressional legislation must be authorized by a power delineated in Article I (as well as not prohibited by something like the First Amendment).
In this case, funding schools is authorized by the Taxing Clause in Article I.
On 3/24/2024 7:17 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/24/2024 7:08 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 07:08:42 -0400, Blue Lives Matter
<Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:02:54 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote in
news:VuGLN.723169$p%Mb.330709@fx15.iad:
On 3/23/2024 7:48 AM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <utlg6s$3d8um$3@dont-email.me>,We should take the federal government out of schools. According to >>>>>> the Constitution it doesn't belong there.
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
lloyd <lloyd@demon.net> wrote in
news:utl8jt$3avdt$2@news.mixmin.net:
On 22 Mar 2024, GEO <George@Foo.invalid> posted some
news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public >>>>>>>>>>> Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private >>>>>>>>>>> schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they >>>>>>>>>> teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a >>>>>>>>>> dress and make up.
Ain't that the truth? Especially in Oregon.
School vouchers be like:
'I don't like the public parks, so I want my kid to go to the
Country Club to play - and I want the Public Parks to pay for it.' >>>>>>>> 'oh! and I want my property taxes reduced by not paying for those >>>>>>>> public parks.'
Who said that? Why did they take trade classes out of the schools? >>>>>>>
Where in the Constitution does it say anything about schools?
Nowhere, Dummy, that's the point
Then there's no reason for the Federal government to not participate
in schools since isn't forbidden.
That's not the way federalism works. Congressional legislation must be
authorized by a power delineated in Article I (as well as not
prohibited by something like the First Amendment).
In this case, funding schools is authorized by the Taxing Clause in
Article I.
Funding schools is not anything for the general welfare.
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in news:9ii20jdiu4nlvqi92tmne4prcj52vef4ei@4ax.com:
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 03:20:02 -0000 (UTC), BaxterDoesn't matter how many - that they exist disproves your
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:3u010jlv5095e1unstftm83hkajov9ar20@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 19:40:30 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:66006d63$0$876051$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utphkk$eikh$1@dont-email.me>,
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>> news:49200jta9t047a6e3su01h8o4fc69t1s4f@4ax.com:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:01:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxter_spamblock@baxcode.com
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65ff0cb0$1$4195 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utmq31$3mj2s$3@dont-email.me>, bax02
<George@Foo.invalid>says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:65feddeb$0$6403$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <kr4tvi9dnnjtkgg9n2oqf29alhmp1jjj85@4ax.com>, >>>>>>>>>>>> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:03:57 -0000 (UTC), GEO
teachwrote:
You really think public schools educate? The only thing >>>>>>>>>>>>>> they
homedressis that if you are male you are female and you need to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wear a
and make up.
Your bag doesn't match your shoes.
Swill
He's right. I took my son out in his freshman year and let >>>>>>>>>>>> him
toschool. He's doing just fine and doesn't think men can be >>>>>>>>>>>> women.
You think sexual orientation can be taught? Did the schools >>>>>>>>>>> you went
teach you to be a "man"? Is your sexual orientation so
fragile?
A dick = a man
A pussy = a woman
Pretty simple really.
You're a simpleton. A bigotted hateful one at that. Genger roles >>>>>>>>> have swapped for thousands of years.
Roles swap maybe, not genitals.
Surgery has advanced in those millenia. But think about it - back >>>>>>> then, 3 sexes = male, female, castrati
What advance? You sew a dick on a woman, she's still a woman. Drill >>>>>> a hole in the guy that just lost his dick and he's still a man.
And what about those born with both dick and vagina? Or neither dick >>>>> nor vagina?
Same as people with two heads.....
Nope
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abby_and_Brittany_Hensel
Far more people with both dick and vagina.
So, how many?
binary 'dick OR vagina'.
On 3/24/2024 7:17 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
In this case, funding schools is authorized by the Taxing Clause in
Article I.
Funding schools is not anything for the general welfare.
A baby born with only two fingers doesn't mean it's normal to only
have two fingers.
On 3/24/2024 9:30 PM, Baxter wrote:
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote:That's only a recent hijacking and redefinition of the term.
Contrary to the oft-heard mantra, gender is NOT a social construct.
==============
Gender refers to the characteristics of women, men, girls and boys
that are socially constructed. This includes norms, behaviours and
roles associated with being a woman, man, girl or boy, as well as
relationships with each other. As a social construct, gender varies
from society to society and can change over time.
https://www.who.int/health-topics/gender
It's historically false and even today is inaccurate and
incomplete at best.
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote:
A baby born with only two fingers doesn't mean it's normal to only
have two fingers.
A baby born with only two fingers doesn't make it non-human, or deserving
of your hatred.
On 3/25/2024 4:33 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
On 3/24/2024 8:17 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
I'm sorry to learn you're that retarded.
funding schools is authorized by the Taxing Clause in Article I.
Me and the Supreme Court.
"The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts
and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common defense and
general welfare of the United States."
SCOTUS has long established a broad Congressional power to spend for the >"general welfare." See United States v. Butler (1936), Helvering v.
Davis (1937), South Dakota v. Dole (1987).
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >news:ffb30jphkvfdf82rk1jtt5cs5f9ia9pnlo@4ax.com:
A baby born with only two fingers doesn't mean it's normal to only
have two fingers.
A baby born with only two fingers doesn't make it non-human, or deserving
of your hatred.
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in news:ffb30jphkvfdf82rk1jtt5cs5f9ia9pnlo@4ax.com:
A baby born with only two fingers doesn't mean it's normal to only
have two fingers.
A baby born with only two fingers doesn't make it non-human, or deserving
of your hatred.
Mike Colangelo <air@vatican_.con> wrote in news:u0oMN.131590$Vrtf.67161@fx39.iad:
On 3/24/2024 7:17 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
In this case, funding schools is authorized by the Taxing Clause in
Article I.
Funding schools is not anything for the general welfare.
You have no conception of what Education is.
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote in
news:Q_nMN.686852$xHn7.303646@fx14.iad:
On 3/24/2024 9:30 PM, Baxter wrote:
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote:That's only a recent hijacking and redefinition of the term.
Contrary to the oft-heard mantra, gender is NOT a social construct.
==============
Gender refers to the characteristics of women, men, girls and boys
that are socially constructed. This includes norms, behaviours and
roles associated with being a woman, man, girl or boy, as well as
relationships with each other. As a social construct, gender varies
from society to society and can change over time.
https://www.who.int/health-topics/gender
It's historically false and even today is inaccurate and
incomplete at best.
Knowledge about conception is recent too.
I'll take the word of science
over your throwback superstious hatred.
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in news:ffb30jphkvfdf82rk1jtt5cs5f9ia9pnlo@4ax.com:
A baby born with only two fingers doesn't mean it's normal to only
have two fingers.
A baby born with only two fingers doesn't make it non-human, or deserving
of your hatred.
On 3/25/2024 4:45 PM, Mike Colangelo wrote:
On 3/24/2024 7:17 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/24/2024 7:08 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 07:08:42 -0400, Blue Lives Matter
<Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:02:54 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote in
news:VuGLN.723169$p%Mb.330709@fx15.iad:
On 3/23/2024 7:48 AM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <utlg6s$3d8um$3@dont-email.me>,We should take the federal government out of schools. According to >>>>>>> the Constitution it doesn't belong there.
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
lloyd <lloyd@demon.net> wrote in
news:utl8jt$3avdt$2@news.mixmin.net:
On 22 Mar 2024, GEO <George@Foo.invalid> posted some
news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public >>>>>>>>>>>> Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private >>>>>>>>>>>> schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they teach >>>>>>>>>>> is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a >>>>>>>>>>> dress and make up.
Ain't that the truth? Especially in Oregon.
School vouchers be like:
'I don't like the public parks, so I want my kid to go to the >>>>>>>>> Country Club to play - and I want the Public Parks to pay for it.' >>>>>>>>> 'oh! and I want my property taxes reduced by not paying for those >>>>>>>>> public parks.'
Who said that? Why did they take trade classes out of the schools? >>>>>>>>
Where in the Constitution does it say anything about schools?
Nowhere, Dummy, that's the point
Then there's no reason for the Federal government to not participate in >>>> schools since isn't forbidden.
That's not the way federalism works. Congressional legislation must be
authorized by a power delineated in Article I (as well as not prohibited by >>> something like the First Amendment).
In this case, funding schools is authorized by the Taxing Clause in Article I.
Funding schools is not anything for the general welfare.
From South Dakota v. Dole (1987):
"In considering whether a particular expenditure is intended to serve general public purposes, courts should defer substantially to the judgment of Congress.
Helvering v. Davis, supra, at 301 U. S. 640, 301 U. S. 645. {Footnote 2}: The level of deference to the congressional decision is such that the Court has more
recently questioned whether "general welfare" is a judicially enforceable restriction at all.
In article <uttctu$1err8$1@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:ffb30jphkvfdf82rk1jtt5cs5f9ia9pnlo@4ax.com:
A baby born with only two fingers doesn't mean it's normal to only
have two fingers.
A baby born with only two fingers doesn't make it non-human, or
deserving of your hatred.
What hatred? It's still not normal.
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:6602df98$0$2130800$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <uttctu$1err8$1@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:ffb30jphkvfdf82rk1jtt5cs5f9ia9pnlo@4ax.com:
A baby born with only two fingers doesn't mean it's normal to only
have two fingers.
A baby born with only two fingers doesn't make it non-human, or
deserving of your hatred.
What hatred? It's still not normal.
Can't let them use the same bathrooms, sit at the same lunch counters, etc.
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message news:uttd51$1err8$3@dont-email.me...
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote in
news:Q_nMN.686852$xHn7.303646@fx14.iad:
On 3/24/2024 9:30 PM, Baxter wrote:
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote:That's only a recent hijacking and redefinition of the term.
Contrary to the oft-heard mantra, gender is NOT a social construct.
==============
Gender refers to the characteristics of women, men, girls and boys
that are socially constructed. This includes norms, behaviours and
roles associated with being a woman, man, girl or boy, as well as
relationships with each other. As a social construct, gender varies
from society to society and can change over time.
https://www.who.int/health-topics/gender
It's historically false and even today is inaccurate and
incomplete at best.
Knowledge about conception is recent too.
Bullshit.. we've understood the reasons for thousands of years if not
longer.
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 16:42:09 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 3/25/2024 4:33 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
On 3/24/2024 8:17 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
I'm sorry to learn you're that retarded.
funding schools is authorized by the Taxing Clause in Article I.
Me and the Supreme Court.
"The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts
and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common defense and
general welfare of the United States."
SCOTUS has long established a broad Congressional power to spend for the
"general welfare." See United States v. Butler (1936), Helvering v.
Davis (1937), South Dakota v. Dole (1987).
Nothing about schools..
On 3/25/2024 4:52 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/25/2024 4:45 PM, Mike Colangelo wrote:
On 3/24/2024 7:17 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/24/2024 7:08 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 07:08:42 -0400, Blue Lives Matter
<Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:02:54 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote in
news:VuGLN.723169$p%Mb.330709@fx15.iad:
On 3/23/2024 7:48 AM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <utlg6s$3d8um$3@dont-email.me>,We should take the federal government out of schools. According to >>>>>>>> the Constitution it doesn't belong there.
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
lloyd <lloyd@demon.net> wrote in
news:utl8jt$3avdt$2@news.mixmin.net:
On 22 Mar 2024, GEO <George@Foo.invalid> posted some
news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public >>>>>>>>>>>>> Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private >>>>>>>>>>>>> schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they >>>>>>>>>>>> teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a >>>>>>>>>>>> dress and make up.
Ain't that the truth? Especially in Oregon.
School vouchers be like:
'I don't like the public parks, so I want my kid to go to the >>>>>>>>>> Country Club to play - and I want the Public Parks to pay for >>>>>>>>>> it.'
'oh! and I want my property taxes reduced by not paying for those >>>>>>>>>> public parks.'
Who said that? Why did they take trade classes out of the schools? >>>>>>>>>
Where in the Constitution does it say anything about schools?
Nowhere, Dummy, that's the point
Then there's no reason for the Federal government to not
participate in schools since isn't forbidden.
That's not the way federalism works. Congressional legislation must
be authorized by a power delineated in Article I (as well as not
prohibited by something like the First Amendment).
In this case, funding schools is authorized by the Taxing Clause in
Article I.
Funding schools is not anything for the general welfare.
 From South Dakota v. Dole (1987):
"In considering whether a particular expenditure is intended to serve
general public purposes, courts should defer substantially to the
judgment of Congress. Helvering v. Davis, supra, at 301 U. S. 640, 301
U. S. 645. {Footnote 2}: The level of deference to the congressional
decision is such that the Court has more recently questioned whether
"general welfare" is a judicially enforceable restriction at all.
So let's just pretend it's not in the Constitution at all.
"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in news:utuc7f $1pkpm$3@dont-email.me:
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message news:uttd51$1err8$3@dont-email.me...
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote in
news:Q_nMN.686852$xHn7.303646@fx14.iad:
On 3/24/2024 9:30 PM, Baxter wrote:
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote:That's only a recent hijacking and redefinition of the term.
==============Contrary to the oft-heard mantra, gender is NOT a social construct. >>>>
Gender refers to the characteristics of women, men, girls and boys
that are socially constructed. This includes norms, behaviours and
roles associated with being a woman, man, girl or boy, as well as
relationships with each other. As a social construct, gender varies
from society to society and can change over time.
https://www.who.int/health-topics/gender
It's historically false and even today is inaccurate and
incomplete at best.
Knowledge about conception is recent too.
Bullshit.. we've understood the reasons for thousands of years if not longer.
Bullshit yourself.
============
Why It Took Scientists So Long to Figure Out Where Babies Come From
Human conception was still basically a total mystery until as recently as 1875.
https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/discovery-where-babies-come-from
============
Until 1875, no one in the world knew where babies come from. Ordinary
people didn?t know, and neither did the scientists who helped shape the modern world. Leonardo da Vinci didn?t know, Galileo didn?t know, Isaac Newton didn?t know.
They knew, that is, that men and women have sex and as a result,
sometimes, babies, but they did not know how those babies are created.
They did not know that women produce eggs, and when they finally
discovered sperm cells, they did not know that those wriggly tadpoles had anything to do with babies and pregnancy. (The leading theory was that
they were parasites, perhaps related to the newly discovered mini-
creatures that swam in drops of pond water. This was Newton?s view.)
https://observer.com/2017/06/the-story-of-the-quest-to-discover-where- babies-come-from-family-history-reproduction-sex/
=================
So your "Personhood at point of conception" is recent and has NOT been
around for "thousands of years"
On 3/26/2024 7:45 AM, Mike Colangelo wrote:
On 3/25/2024 4:52 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/25/2024 4:45 PM, Mike Colangelo wrote:
On 3/24/2024 7:17 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/24/2024 7:08 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 07:08:42 -0400, Blue Lives Matter
<Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:02:54 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote in
news:VuGLN.723169$p%Mb.330709@fx15.iad:
On 3/23/2024 7:48 AM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <utlg6s$3d8um$3@dont-email.me>,We should take the federal government out of schools.
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
lloyd <lloyd@demon.net> wrote in
news:utl8jt$3avdt$2@news.mixmin.net:
On 22 Mar 2024, GEO <George@Foo.invalid> posted some
news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com>
wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the >>>>>>>>>>>>> Public Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund >>>>>>>>>>>>> those private schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing >>>>>>>>>>>> they teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need to >>>>>>>>>>>> wear a dress and make up.
Ain't that the truth? Especially in Oregon.
School vouchers be like:
'I don't like the public parks, so I want my kid to go to >>>>>>>>>> the Country Club to play - and I want the Public Parks to >>>>>>>>>> pay for it.'
'oh! and I want my property taxes reduced by not paying
for those public parks.'
Who said that? Why did they take trade classes out of the
schools?
According to the Constitution it doesn't belong there.
Where in the Constitution does it say anything about schools?
Nowhere, Dummy, that's the point
Then there's no reason for the Federal government to not
participate in schools since isn't forbidden.
That's not the way federalism works. Congressional legislation
must be authorized by a power delineated in Article I (as well
as not prohibited by something like the First Amendment).
In this case, funding schools is authorized by the Taxing Clause
in Article I.
Funding schools is not anything for the general welfare.
 From South Dakota v. Dole (1987):
"In considering whether a particular expenditure is intended to
serve general public purposes, courts should defer substantially
to the judgment of Congress. Helvering v. Davis, supra, at 301 U.
S. 640, 301 U. S. 645. {Footnote 2}: The level of deference to the
congressional decision is such that the Court has more recently
questioned whether "general welfare" is a judicially enforceable
restriction at all.
So let's just pretend it's not in the Constitution at all.
Leaving the footnote aside, The Court argues it is following the Constitution. But Congress makes the determination of whether funding
serves general public purposes, except when it is irrational to
believe it is.
It is rational to believe funding education promotes general public
purposes by providing for a better educated public.
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 08:21:41 -0700
Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 3/26/2024 7:45 AM, Mike Colangelo wrote:
On 3/25/2024 4:52 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/25/2024 4:45 PM, Mike Colangelo wrote:
On 3/24/2024 7:17 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/24/2024 7:08 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 07:08:42 -0400, Blue Lives Matter
<Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:02:54 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote in
news:VuGLN.723169$p%Mb.330709@fx15.iad:
On 3/23/2024 7:48 AM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <utlg6s$3d8um$3@dont-email.me>,We should take the federal government out of schools.
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
lloyd <lloyd@demon.net> wrote in
news:utl8jt$3avdt$2@news.mixmin.net:
On 22 Mar 2024, GEO <George@Foo.invalid> posted some >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Public Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those private schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing >>>>>>>>>>>>>> they teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wear a dress and make up.
Ain't that the truth? Especially in Oregon.
School vouchers be like:
'I don't like the public parks, so I want my kid to go to >>>>>>>>>>>> the Country Club to play - and I want the Public Parks to >>>>>>>>>>>> pay for it.'
'oh! and I want my property taxes reduced by not paying >>>>>>>>>>>> for those public parks.'
Who said that? Why did they take trade classes out of the >>>>>>>>>>> schools?
According to the Constitution it doesn't belong there.
Where in the Constitution does it say anything about schools? >>>>>>>>>
Nowhere, Dummy, that's the point
Then there's no reason for the Federal government to not
participate in schools since isn't forbidden.
That's not the way federalism works. Congressional legislation
must be authorized by a power delineated in Article I (as well
as not prohibited by something like the First Amendment).
In this case, funding schools is authorized by the Taxing Clause
in Article I.
Funding schools is not anything for the general welfare.
 From South Dakota v. Dole (1987):
"In considering whether a particular expenditure is intended to
serve general public purposes, courts should defer substantially
to the judgment of Congress. Helvering v. Davis, supra, at 301 U.
S. 640, 301 U. S. 645. {Footnote 2}: The level of deference to the
congressional decision is such that the Court has more recently
questioned whether "general welfare" is a judicially enforceable
restriction at all.
So let's just pretend it's not in the Constitution at all.
Leaving the footnote aside, The Court argues it is following the
Constitution. But Congress makes the determination of whether funding
serves general public purposes, except when it is irrational to
believe it is.
It is rational to believe funding education promotes general public
purposes by providing for a better educated public.
The public is not better educated. Just the opposite.
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 08:21:41 -0700
Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 3/26/2024 7:45 AM, Mike Colangelo wrote:
On 3/25/2024 4:52 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/25/2024 4:45 PM, Mike Colangelo wrote:
On 3/24/2024 7:17 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/24/2024 7:08 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 07:08:42 -0400, Blue Lives Matter
<Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:02:54 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote in
news:VuGLN.723169$p%Mb.330709@fx15.iad:
On 3/23/2024 7:48 AM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <utlg6s$3d8um$3@dont-email.me>,We should take the federal government out of schools.
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
lloyd <lloyd@demon.net> wrote in
news:utl8jt$3avdt$2@news.mixmin.net:
On 22 Mar 2024, GEO <George@Foo.invalid> posted some >>>>>>>>>>> news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the >>>>>>>>>>>>> Public Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund >>>>>>>>>>>>> those private schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing >>>>>>>>>>>> they teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need to >>>>>>>>>>>> wear a dress and make up.
Ain't that the truth? Especially in Oregon.
School vouchers be like:
'I don't like the public parks, so I want my kid to go to >>>>>>>>>> the Country Club to play - and I want the Public Parks to >>>>>>>>>> pay for it.'
'oh! and I want my property taxes reduced by not paying >>>>>>>>>> for those public parks.'
Who said that? Why did they take trade classes out of the >>>>>>>>> schools?
According to the Constitution it doesn't belong there.
Where in the Constitution does it say anything about schools? >>>>>>>
Nowhere, Dummy, that's the point
Then there's no reason for the Federal government to not
participate in schools since isn't forbidden.
That's not the way federalism works. Congressional legislation
must be authorized by a power delineated in Article I (as well
as not prohibited by something like the First Amendment).
In this case, funding schools is authorized by the Taxing Clause
in Article I.
Funding schools is not anything for the general welfare.
From South Dakota v. Dole (1987):
"In considering whether a particular expenditure is intended to
serve general public purposes, courts should defer substantially
to the judgment of Congress. Helvering v. Davis, supra, at 301 U.
S. 640, 301 U. S. 645. {Footnote 2}: The level of deference to the
congressional decision is such that the Court has more recently
questioned whether "general welfare" is a judicially enforceable
restriction at all.
So let's just pretend it's not in the Constitution at all.
Leaving the footnote aside, The Court argues it is following the Constitution. But Congress makes the determination of whether funding serves general public purposes, except when it is irrational to
believe it is.
It is rational to believe funding education promotes general public purposes by providing for a better educated public.
The public is not better educated. Just the opposite.
In article <20240326103610.568220c7@JA>, johnny@invalid.net says...
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 08:21:41 -0700
Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 3/26/2024 7:45 AM, Mike Colangelo wrote:
On 3/25/2024 4:52 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/25/2024 4:45 PM, Mike Colangelo wrote:
On 3/24/2024 7:17 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/24/2024 7:08 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 07:08:42 -0400, Blue Lives Matter
<Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:02:54 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote in
news:VuGLN.723169$p%Mb.330709@fx15.iad:
On 3/23/2024 7:48 AM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <utlg6s$3d8um$3@dont-email.me>,We should take the federal government out of schools.
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
lloyd <lloyd@demon.net> wrote in
news:utl8jt$3avdt$2@news.mixmin.net:
On 22 Mar 2024, GEO <George@Foo.invalid> posted some >>>>>>>>>>> news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip >>>>>>>>>>>>> the Public Schools of any ability to actually
educate, fund those private schools that
indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only >>>>>>>>>>>> thing they teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need >>>>>>>>>>>> to wear a dress and make up.
Ain't that the truth? Especially in Oregon.
School vouchers be like:
'I don't like the public parks, so I want my kid to go >>>>>>>>>> to the Country Club to play - and I want the Public
Parks to pay for it.'
'oh! and I want my property taxes reduced by not paying >>>>>>>>>> for those public parks.'
Who said that? Why did they take trade classes out of
the schools?
According to the Constitution it doesn't belong there.
Where in the Constitution does it say anything about
schools?
Nowhere, Dummy, that's the point
Then there's no reason for the Federal government to not
participate in schools since isn't forbidden.
That's not the way federalism works. Congressional
legislation must be authorized by a power delineated in
Article I (as well as not prohibited by something like the
First Amendment).
In this case, funding schools is authorized by the Taxing
Clause in Article I.
Funding schools is not anything for the general welfare.
 From South Dakota v. Dole (1987):
"In considering whether a particular expenditure is intended to
serve general public purposes, courts should defer
substantially to the judgment of Congress. Helvering v. Davis,
supra, at 301 U. S. 640, 301 U. S. 645. {Footnote 2}: The
level of deference to the congressional decision is such that
the Court has more recently questioned whether "general
welfare" is a judicially enforceable restriction at all.
So let's just pretend it's not in the Constitution at all.
Leaving the footnote aside, The Court argues it is following the Constitution. But Congress makes the determination of whether
funding serves general public purposes, except when it is
irrational to believe it is.
It is rational to believe funding education promotes general
public purposes by providing for a better educated public.
The public is not better educated. Just the opposite.
You spelled indoctrinated wrong.
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 10:15:58 -0600
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
In article <20240326103610.568220c7@JA>, johnny@invalid.net says...
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 08:21:41 -0700
Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 3/26/2024 7:45 AM, Mike Colangelo wrote:
On 3/25/2024 4:52 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/25/2024 4:45 PM, Mike Colangelo wrote:
On 3/24/2024 7:17 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/24/2024 7:08 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 07:08:42 -0400, Blue Lives Matter
<Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:02:54 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote in
news:VuGLN.723169$p%Mb.330709@fx15.iad:
On 3/23/2024 7:48 AM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <utlg6s$3d8um$3@dont-email.me>,We should take the federal government out of schools.
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
lloyd <lloyd@demon.net> wrote in
news:utl8jt$3avdt$2@news.mixmin.net:
On 22 Mar 2024, GEO <George@Foo.invalid> posted some >>>>>>>>>>> news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip >>>>>>>>>>>>> the Public Schools of any ability to actually >>>>>>>>>>>>> educate, fund those private schools that
indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only >>>>>>>>>>>> thing they teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need >>>>>>>>>>>> to wear a dress and make up.
Ain't that the truth? Especially in Oregon.
School vouchers be like:
'I don't like the public parks, so I want my kid to go >>>>>>>>>> to the Country Club to play - and I want the Public >>>>>>>>>> Parks to pay for it.'
'oh! and I want my property taxes reduced by not paying >>>>>>>>>> for those public parks.'
Who said that? Why did they take trade classes out of >>>>>>>>> the schools?
According to the Constitution it doesn't belong there. >>>>>>>>
Where in the Constitution does it say anything about
schools?
Nowhere, Dummy, that's the point
Then there's no reason for the Federal government to not
participate in schools since isn't forbidden.
That's not the way federalism works. Congressional
legislation must be authorized by a power delineated in
Article I (as well as not prohibited by something like the
First Amendment).
In this case, funding schools is authorized by the Taxing
Clause in Article I.
Funding schools is not anything for the general welfare.
From South Dakota v. Dole (1987):
"In considering whether a particular expenditure is intended to
serve general public purposes, courts should defer
substantially to the judgment of Congress. Helvering v. Davis,
supra, at 301 U. S. 640, 301 U. S. 645. {Footnote 2}: The
level of deference to the congressional decision is such that
the Court has more recently questioned whether "general
welfare" is a judicially enforceable restriction at all.
So let's just pretend it's not in the Constitution at all.
Leaving the footnote aside, The Court argues it is following the Constitution. But Congress makes the determination of whether
funding serves general public purposes, except when it is
irrational to believe it is.
It is rational to believe funding education promotes general
public purposes by providing for a better educated public.
The public is not better educated. Just the opposite.
You spelled indoctrinated wrong.
You are correct, diversity equity and inclusion doesn't educate
students, it indoctrinates them.
On 3/26/2024 7:45 AM, Mike Colangelo wrote:
On 3/25/2024 4:52 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/25/2024 4:45 PM, Mike Colangelo wrote:
On 3/24/2024 7:17 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/24/2024 7:08 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 07:08:42 -0400, Blue Lives Matter
<Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:02:54 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote in
news:VuGLN.723169$p%Mb.330709@fx15.iad:
On 3/23/2024 7:48 AM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <utlg6s$3d8um$3@dont-email.me>,We should take the federal government out of schools. According to >>>>>>>>> the Constitution it doesn't belong there.
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
lloyd <lloyd@demon.net> wrote in
news:utl8jt$3avdt$2@news.mixmin.net:
On 22 Mar 2024, GEO <George@Foo.invalid> posted some
news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private >>>>>>>>>>>>>> schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a >>>>>>>>>>>>> dress and make up.
Ain't that the truth? Especially in Oregon.
School vouchers be like:
'I don't like the public parks, so I want my kid to go to the >>>>>>>>>>> Country Club to play - and I want the Public Parks to pay for it.' >>>>>>>>>>> 'oh! and I want my property taxes reduced by not paying for those >>>>>>>>>>> public parks.'
Who said that? Why did they take trade classes out of the schools? >>>>>>>>>>
Where in the Constitution does it say anything about schools?
Nowhere, Dummy, that's the point
Then there's no reason for the Federal government to not participate in >>>>>> schools since isn't forbidden.
That's not the way federalism works. Congressional legislation must be >>>>> authorized by a power delineated in Article I (as well as not prohibited by
something like the First Amendment).
In this case, funding schools is authorized by the Taxing Clause in Article I.
Funding schools is not anything for the general welfare.
 From South Dakota v. Dole (1987):
"In considering whether a particular expenditure is intended to serve general
public purposes, courts should defer substantially to the judgment of
Congress. Helvering v. Davis, supra, at 301 U. S. 640, 301 U. S. 645.
{Footnote 2}: The level of deference to the congressional decision is such >>> that the Court has more recently questioned whether "general welfare" is a >>> judicially enforceable restriction at all.
So let's just pretend it's not in the Constitution at all.
Leaving the footnote aside, The Court argues it is following the Constitution.
In article <utuoj2$1sbs5$2@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
news:utuc7f $1pkpm$3@dont-email.me:
Bullshit yourself.
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:uttd51$1err8$3@dont-email.me...
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote in
news:Q_nMN.686852$xHn7.303646@fx14.iad:
On 3/24/2024 9:30 PM, Baxter wrote:
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote:That's only a recent hijacking and redefinition of the term.
Contrary to the oft-heard mantra, gender is NOT a social
construct.
==============
Gender refers to the characteristics of women, men, girls and
boys that are socially constructed. This includes norms,
behaviours and roles associated with being a woman, man, girl or
boy, as well as relationships with each other. As a social
construct, gender varies from society to society and can change
over time.
https://www.who.int/health-topics/gender
It's historically false and even today is inaccurate and
incomplete at best.
Knowledge about conception is recent too.
Bullshit.. we've understood the reasons for thousands of years if
not longer.
============
Why It Took Scientists So Long to Figure Out Where Babies Come From
Human conception was still basically a total mystery until as
recently as 1875.
https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/discovery-where-babies-come-from
============
Until 1875, no one in the world knew where babies come from. Ordinary
people didn?t know, and neither did the scientists who helped shape
the modern world. Leonardo da Vinci didn?t know, Galileo didn?t know,
Isaac Newton didn?t know.
They knew, that is, that men and women have sex and as a result,
sometimes, babies, but they did not know how those babies are
created. They did not know that women produce eggs, and when they
finally discovered sperm cells, they did not know that those wriggly
tadpoles had anything to do with babies and pregnancy. (The leading
theory was that they were parasites, perhaps related to the newly
discovered mini- creatures that swam in drops of pond water. This was
Newton?s view.)
https://observer.com/2017/06/the-story-of-the-quest-to-discover-where-
babies-come-from-family-history-reproduction-sex/
=================
So your "Personhood at point of conception" is recent and has NOT
been around for "thousands of years"
You are just trolling.
On 3/26/2024 1:24 AM, Blue Lives Matter wrote:
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 16:42:09 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 3/25/2024 4:33 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
On 3/24/2024 8:17 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
I'm sorry to learn you're that retarded.
funding schools is authorized by the Taxing Clause in Article I.
Me and the Supreme Court.
"The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes, duties,
imposts and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common
defense and general welfare of the United States."
SCOTUS has long established a broad Congressional power to spend for
the "general welfare." See United States v. Butler (1936), Helvering
v. Davis (1937), South Dakota v. Dole (1987).
Nothing about schools..
... or Social Security. But, the Court said in Butler no specific
mention is required.
Madison's position was specific mentions were required. Hamilton said
it wasn't. In Butler, the Court accepted Hamilton's view, and that
remains the law today.
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 08:21:41 -0700
Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 3/26/2024 7:45 AM, Mike Colangelo wrote:
On 3/25/2024 4:52 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/25/2024 4:45 PM, Mike Colangelo wrote:
On 3/24/2024 7:17 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/24/2024 7:08 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 07:08:42 -0400, Blue Lives Matter
<Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:02:54 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote in
news:VuGLN.723169$p%Mb.330709@fx15.iad:
On 3/23/2024 7:48 AM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <utlg6s$3d8um$3@dont-email.me>,We should take the federal government out of schools.
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
lloyd <lloyd@demon.net> wrote in
news:utl8jt$3avdt$2@news.mixmin.net:
On 22 Mar 2024, GEO <George@Foo.invalid> posted some
news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com>
wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the
Public Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund
those private schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing
they teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need to
wear a dress and make up.
Ain't that the truth? Especially in Oregon.
School vouchers be like:
'I don't like the public parks, so I want my kid to go to
the Country Club to play - and I want the Public Parks to
pay for it.'
'oh! and I want my property taxes reduced by not paying
for those public parks.'
Who said that? Why did they take trade classes out of the
schools?
According to the Constitution it doesn't belong there.
Where in the Constitution does it say anything about schools?
Nowhere, Dummy, that's the point
Then there's no reason for the Federal government to not
participate in schools since isn't forbidden.
That's not the way federalism works. Congressional legislation
must be authorized by a power delineated in Article I (as well
as not prohibited by something like the First Amendment).
In this case, funding schools is authorized by the Taxing Clause
in Article I.
Funding schools is not anything for the general welfare.
 From South Dakota v. Dole (1987):
"In considering whether a particular expenditure is intended to
serve general public purposes, courts should defer substantially
to the judgment of Congress. Helvering v. Davis, supra, at 301 U.
S. 640, 301 U. S. 645. {Footnote 2}: The level of deference to the
congressional decision is such that the Court has more recently
questioned whether "general welfare" is a judicially enforceable
restriction at all.
So let's just pretend it's not in the Constitution at all.
Leaving the footnote aside, The Court argues it is following the
Constitution. But Congress makes the determination of whether funding
serves general public purposes, except when it is irrational to
believe it is.
It is rational to believe funding education promotes general public
purposes by providing for a better educated public.
The public is not better educated. Just the opposite.
In article <20240326103610.568220c7@JA>, johnny@invalid.net says...the
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 08:21:41 -0700
Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 3/26/2024 7:45 AM, Mike Colangelo wrote:
On 3/25/2024 4:52 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/25/2024 4:45 PM, Mike Colangelo wrote:
On 3/24/2024 7:17 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/24/2024 7:08 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 07:08:42 -0400, Blue Lives Matter
<Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:02:54 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote in
news:VuGLN.723169$p%Mb.330709@fx15.iad:
On 3/23/2024 7:48 AM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <utlg6s$3d8um$3@dont-email.me>,
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
lloyd <lloyd@demon.net> wrote in
news:utl8jt$3avdt$2@news.mixmin.net:
On 22 Mar 2024, GEO <George@Foo.invalid> posted some
news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com>
wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip
fundPublic Schools of any ability to actually educate,
schools?We should take the federal government out of schools.those private schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing
they teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need to
wear a dress and make up.
Ain't that the truth? Especially in Oregon.
School vouchers be like:
'I don't like the public parks, so I want my kid to go to
the Country Club to play - and I want the Public Parks to
pay for it.'
'oh! and I want my property taxes reduced by not paying
for those public parks.'
Who said that? Why did they take trade classes out of the
schools?
According to the Constitution it doesn't belong there.
Where in the Constitution does it say anything about
Clause
Nowhere, Dummy, that's the point
Then there's no reason for the Federal government to not
participate in schools since isn't forbidden.
That's not the way federalism works. Congressional legislation
must be authorized by a power delineated in Article I (as well
as not prohibited by something like the First Amendment).
In this case, funding schools is authorized by the Taxing
thein Article I.
Funding schools is not anything for the general welfare.
From South Dakota v. Dole (1987):
"In considering whether a particular expenditure is intended to
serve general public purposes, courts should defer substantially
to the judgment of Congress. Helvering v. Davis, supra, at 301 U.
S. 640, 301 U. S. 645. {Footnote 2}: The level of deference to
fundingcongressional decision is such that the Court has more recently
questioned whether "general welfare" is a judicially enforceable
restriction at all.
So let's just pretend it's not in the Constitution at all.
Leaving the footnote aside, The Court argues it is following the
Constitution. But Congress makes the determination of whether
serves general public purposes, except when it is irrational to
believe it is.
It is rational to believe funding education promotes general public
purposes by providing for a better educated public.
The public is not better educated. Just the opposite.
You spelled indoctrinated wrong.
On 3/26/2024 8:21 AM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/26/2024 7:45 AM, Mike Colangelo wrote:
On 3/25/2024 4:52 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/25/2024 4:45 PM, Mike Colangelo wrote:
On 3/24/2024 7:17 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/24/2024 7:08 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 07:08:42 -0400, Blue Lives Matter
<Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:02:54 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote inNowhere, Dummy, that's the point
news:VuGLN.723169$p%Mb.330709@fx15.iad:
On 3/23/2024 7:48 AM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <utlg6s$3d8um$3@dont-email.me>,We should take the federal government out of schools.Â
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
lloyd <lloyd@demon.net> wrote in
news:utl8jt$3avdt$2@news.mixmin.net:
On 22 Mar 2024, GEO <George@Foo.invalid> posted some >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Public Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those private schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing >>>>>>>>>>>>>> they teach is that if you are male you are female and you >>>>>>>>>>>>>> need to wear a dress and make up.
Ain't that the truth? Especially in Oregon.
School vouchers be like:
'I don't like the public parks, so I want my kid to go to >>>>>>>>>>>> the Country Club to play - and I want the Public Parks to >>>>>>>>>>>> pay for it.' 'oh! and I want my property taxes reduced by >>>>>>>>>>>> not paying for those public parks.'
Who said that? Why did they take trade classes out of the >>>>>>>>>>> schools?
According to the Constitution it doesn't belong there.
Where in the Constitution does it say anything about schools? >>>>>>>>
Then there's no reason for the Federal government to not
participate in schools since isn't forbidden.
That's not the way federalism works. Congressional legislation
must be authorized by a power delineated in Article I (as well as
not prohibited by something like the First Amendment).
In this case, funding schools is authorized by the Taxing Clause
in Article I.
Funding schools is not anything for the general welfare.
 From South Dakota v. Dole (1987):
"In considering whether a particular expenditure is intended to
serve general public purposes, courts should defer substantially to
the judgment of Congress. Helvering v. Davis, supra, at 301 U. S.
640, 301 U. S. 645. {Footnote 2}: The level of deference to the
congressional decision is such that the Court has more recently
questioned whether "general welfare" is a judicially enforceable
restriction at all.
So let's just pretend it's not in the Constitution at all.
Leaving the footnote aside, The Court argues it is following the
Constitution.
That argument can only be made by slimy sophists. The framers
definitely did not anticipate or want the federal government to be
doing the bulk of what it currently does.
On 3/26/2024 1:24 AM, Blue Lives Matter wrote:
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 16:42:09 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 3/25/2024 4:33 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
On 3/24/2024 8:17 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
I'm sorry to learn you're that retarded.
funding schools is authorized by the Taxing Clause in Article I.
Me and the Supreme Court.
"The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts >>> and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common defense and
general welfare of the United States."
SCOTUS has long established a broad Congressional power to spend for the >>> "general welfare." See United States v. Butler (1936), Helvering v.
Davis (1937), South Dakota v. Dole (1987).
Nothing about schools..
... or Social Security. But, the Court said in Butler no specific
mention is required.
Madison's position was specific mentions were required. Hamilton said it >wasn't. In Butler, the Court accepted Hamilton's view, and that remains
the law today.
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:6602e9c1$0$2077923$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utuoj2$1sbs5$2@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
news:utuc7f $1pkpm$3@dont-email.me:
Bullshit yourself.
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:uttd51$1err8$3@dont-email.me...
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote in
news:Q_nMN.686852$xHn7.303646@fx14.iad:
On 3/24/2024 9:30 PM, Baxter wrote:
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote:That's only a recent hijacking and redefinition of the term.
Contrary to the oft-heard mantra, gender is NOT a social
construct.
==============
Gender refers to the characteristics of women, men, girls and
boys that are socially constructed. This includes norms,
behaviours and roles associated with being a woman, man, girl or
boy, as well as relationships with each other. As a social
construct, gender varies from society to society and can change
over time.
https://www.who.int/health-topics/gender
It's historically false and even today is inaccurate and
incomplete at best.
Knowledge about conception is recent too.
Bullshit.. we've understood the reasons for thousands of years if
not longer.
============
Why It Took Scientists So Long to Figure Out Where Babies Come From
Human conception was still basically a total mystery until as
recently as 1875.
https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/discovery-where-babies-come-from
============
Until 1875, no one in the world knew where babies come from. Ordinary
people didn?t know, and neither did the scientists who helped shape
the modern world. Leonardo da Vinci didn?t know, Galileo didn?t know,
Isaac Newton didn?t know.
They knew, that is, that men and women have sex and as a result,
sometimes, babies, but they did not know how those babies are
created. They did not know that women produce eggs, and when they
finally discovered sperm cells, they did not know that those wriggly
tadpoles had anything to do with babies and pregnancy. (The leading
theory was that they were parasites, perhaps related to the newly
discovered mini- creatures that swam in drops of pond water. This was
Newton?s view.)
https://observer.com/2017/06/the-story-of-the-quest-to-discover-where-
babies-come-from-family-history-reproduction-sex/
=================
So your "Personhood at point of conception" is recent and has NOT
been around for "thousands of years"
You are just trolling.
IOW, you hate science and history.
Mike Colangelo <air@vatican_.con> wrote in news:MbEMN.105038$_a1e.20201@fx16.iad:
On 3/26/2024 8:21 AM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/26/2024 7:45 AM, Mike Colangelo wrote:
On 3/25/2024 4:52 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/25/2024 4:45 PM, Mike Colangelo wrote:
On 3/24/2024 7:17 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/24/2024 7:08 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 07:08:42 -0400, Blue Lives Matter
<Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:02:54 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote inNowhere, Dummy, that's the point
news:VuGLN.723169$p%Mb.330709@fx15.iad:
On 3/23/2024 7:48 AM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <utlg6s$3d8um$3@dont-email.me>,We should take the federal government out of schools.Â
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
lloyd <lloyd@demon.net> wrote in
news:utl8jt$3avdt$2@news.mixmin.net:
On 22 Mar 2024, GEO <George@Foo.invalid> posted some >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Public Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those private schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing >>>>>>>>>>>>>> they teach is that if you are male you are female and you >>>>>>>>>>>>>> need to wear a dress and make up.
Ain't that the truth? Especially in Oregon.
School vouchers be like:
'I don't like the public parks, so I want my kid to go to >>>>>>>>>>>> the Country Club to play - and I want the Public Parks to >>>>>>>>>>>> pay for it.' 'oh! and I want my property taxes reduced by >>>>>>>>>>>> not paying for those public parks.'
Who said that? Why did they take trade classes out of the >>>>>>>>>>> schools?
According to the Constitution it doesn't belong there.
Where in the Constitution does it say anything about schools? >>>>>>>>
Then there's no reason for the Federal government to not
participate in schools since isn't forbidden.
That's not the way federalism works. Congressional legislation
must be authorized by a power delineated in Article I (as well as >>>>>> not prohibited by something like the First Amendment).
In this case, funding schools is authorized by the Taxing Clause >>>>>> in Article I.
Funding schools is not anything for the general welfare.
 From South Dakota v. Dole (1987):
"In considering whether a particular expenditure is intended to
serve general public purposes, courts should defer substantially to
the judgment of Congress. Helvering v. Davis, supra, at 301 U. S.
640, 301 U. S. 645. {Footnote 2}: The level of deference to the
congressional decision is such that the Court has more recently
questioned whether "general welfare" is a judicially enforceable
restriction at all.
So let's just pretend it's not in the Constitution at all.
Leaving the footnote aside, The Court argues it is following the
Constitution.
That argument can only be made by slimy sophists. The framers
definitely did not anticipate or want the federal government to be
doing the bulk of what it currently does.
The frimers of the Constitution had no inkling of things to come.
There's this thing called "progress" that you absolutely hate.
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote:
On 3/24/2024 9:30 PM, Baxter wrote:Knowledge about conception is recent too.
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote:That's only a recent hijacking and redefinition of the term.
==============Contrary to the oft-heard mantra, gender is NOT a social construct.
Gender refers to the characteristics of women, men, girls and boys
that are socially constructed. This includes norms, behaviours and
roles associated with being a woman, man, girl or boy, as well as
relationships with each other. As a social construct, gender varies
from society to society and can change over time.
https://www.who.int/health-topics/gender
It's historically false and even today is inaccurate and
incomplete at best.
Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote in >news:utup64$1srn1$1@dont-email.me:
On 3/26/2024 1:24 AM, Blue Lives Matter wrote:
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 16:42:09 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 3/25/2024 4:33 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
On 3/24/2024 8:17 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
I'm sorry to learn you're that retarded.
funding schools is authorized by the Taxing Clause in Article I.
Me and the Supreme Court.
"The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes, duties,
imposts and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common
defense and general welfare of the United States."
SCOTUS has long established a broad Congressional power to spend for
the "general welfare." See United States v. Butler (1936), Helvering
v. Davis (1937), South Dakota v. Dole (1987).
Nothing about schools..
... or Social Security. But, the Court said in Butler no specific
mention is required.
Madison's position was specific mentions were required. Hamilton said
it wasn't. In Butler, the Court accepted Hamilton's view, and that
remains the law today.
There were a lot of things not dreampt of when the Constitution was
written. Perhaps you'd like to have NO interstate highways? Or air
travel? Or a host of other things we take for granted?
On 3/25/2024 8:50 PM, Baxter wrote:
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote:
On 3/24/2024 9:30 PM, Baxter wrote:Knowledge about conception is recent too.
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote:That's only a recent hijacking and redefinition of the term.
==============Contrary to the oft-heard mantra, gender is NOT a social construct.
Gender refers to the characteristics of women, men, girls and boys
that are socially constructed. This includes norms, behaviours and
roles associated with being a woman, man, girl or boy, as well as
relationships with each other. As a social construct, gender varies
from society to society and can change over time.
https://www.who.int/health-topics/gender
It's historically false and even today is inaccurate and
incomplete at best.
Only if recent means since the dawn of history.
In article <utvbhf$2ba3d$2@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:6602e9c1$0$2077923$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utuoj2$1sbs5$2@dont-email.me>,
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
news:utuc7f $1pkpm$3@dont-email.me:
Bullshit yourself.
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:uttd51$1err8$3@dont-email.me...
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote in
news:Q_nMN.686852$xHn7.303646@fx14.iad:
On 3/24/2024 9:30 PM, Baxter wrote:
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote:That's only a recent hijacking and redefinition of the term.
Contrary to the oft-heard mantra, gender is NOT a social
construct.
==============
Gender refers to the characteristics of women, men, girls and
boys that are socially constructed. This includes norms,
behaviours and roles associated with being a woman, man, girl
or boy, as well as relationships with each other. As a social
construct, gender varies from society to society and can
change over time.
https://www.who.int/health-topics/gender
It's historically false and even today is inaccurate and
incomplete at best.
Knowledge about conception is recent too.
Bullshit.. we've understood the reasons for thousands of years
if not longer.
============
Why It Took Scientists So Long to Figure Out Where Babies Come
From
Human conception was still basically a total mystery until as
recently as 1875.
https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/discovery-where-babies-come-f
rom
============
Until 1875, no one in the world knew where babies come from.
Ordinary people didn?t know, and neither did the scientists who
helped shape the modern world. Leonardo da Vinci didn?t know,
Galileo didn?t know, Isaac Newton didn?t know.
They knew, that is, that men and women have sex and as a result,
sometimes, babies, but they did not know how those babies are
created. They did not know that women produce eggs, and when they
finally discovered sperm cells, they did not know that those
wriggly tadpoles had anything to do with babies and pregnancy.
(The leading theory was that they were parasites, perhaps related
to the newly discovered mini- creatures that swam in drops of pond
water. This was Newton?s view.)
https://observer.com/2017/06/the-story-of-the-quest-to-discover-whe
re- babies-come-from-family-history-reproduction-sex/
=================
So your "Personhood at point of conception" is recent and has NOT
been around for "thousands of years"
You are just trolling.
IOW, you hate science and history.
Did I say that?
Why know I didn't. But you did. Why do your type
always assume?
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 20:33:51 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:for
Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote in >>news:utup64$1srn1$1@dont-email.me:
On 3/26/2024 1:24 AM, Blue Lives Matter wrote:
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 16:42:09 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 3/25/2024 4:33 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
On 3/24/2024 8:17 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
I'm sorry to learn you're that retarded.
funding schools is authorized by the Taxing Clause in Article I. >>>>>>>
Me and the Supreme Court.
"The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes, duties,
imposts and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common
defense and general welfare of the United States."
SCOTUS has long established a broad Congressional power to spend
Helveringthe "general welfare." See United States v. Butler (1936),
v. Davis (1937), South Dakota v. Dole (1987).
Nothing about schools..
... or Social Security. But, the Court said in Butler no specific
mention is required.
Madison's position was specific mentions were required. Hamilton said
it wasn't. In Butler, the Court accepted Hamilton's view, and that
remains the law today.
There were a lot of things not dreampt of when the Constitution was >>written. Perhaps you'd like to have NO interstate highways? Or air >>travel? Or a host of other things we take for granted?
Yeah, but schools existed back when they wrote the Constitution and
the founders did not give the Feds power to control them.
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 20:33:51 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
There were a lot of things not dreampt of when the Constitution was >>written. Perhaps you'd like to have NO interstate highways? Or air >>travel? Or a host of other things we take for granted?
Yeah, but schools existed back when they wrote the Constitution and
the founders did not give the Feds power to control them.
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote in news:fkIMN.127072$6ePe.65484@fx42.iad:
On 3/25/2024 8:50 PM, Baxter wrote:
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote:
On 3/24/2024 9:30 PM, Baxter wrote:
Gender refers to the characteristics of women, men, girls and boys
that are socially constructed. This includes norms, behaviours and
roles associated with being a woman, man, girl or boy, as well as
relationships with each other. As a social construct, gender
varies from society to society and can change over time.
https://www.who.int/health-topics/gender
That's only a recent hijacking and redefinition of the term.
It's historically false and even today is inaccurate and
incomplete at best.
Knowledge about conception is recent too.
Only if recent means since the dawn of history.
So History began in the lates 1700's?!! It wasn't until 1776 that
they found out that sperm were involved in reporduction. ...
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >news:c4l60jt0tjujc84ib1ghjri5m1610v0lvp@4ax.com:
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 20:33:51 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
There were a lot of things not dreampt of when the Constitution was >>>written. Perhaps you'd like to have NO interstate highways? Or air >>>travel? Or a host of other things we take for granted?
Yeah, but schools existed back when they wrote the Constitution and
the founders did not give the Feds power to control them.
==============
As George Washington ended his term as the first president of the United >States, he left with a few parting words. Washington’s Farewell Address
of 1796 delineated many of the recommendations Washington had for the
future of his country. Amongst these suggestions was a public education >system. Washington instructed American leaders to “promote… institutions
for the general diffusion of knowledge. In proportion as the structure of
a government gives force to public opinion, it is essential that public >opinion should be enlightened.” Washington saw the importance of
educating the American public as a means to grow the country
economically, but also to create a well-informed populace to participate
in America’s newly founded democracy.
https://ushistoryscene.com/article/rise-of-public-education/
"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in news:utuc7f $1pkpm$3@dont-email.me:
Bullshit yourself.
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:uttd51$1err8$3@dont-email.me...
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote in
news:Q_nMN.686852$xHn7.303646@fx14.iad:
On 3/24/2024 9:30 PM, Baxter wrote:
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote:That's only a recent hijacking and redefinition of the term.
==============Contrary to the oft-heard mantra, gender is NOT a social construct. >>>>>
Gender refers to the characteristics of women, men, girls and boys
that are socially constructed. This includes norms, behaviours and
roles associated with being a woman, man, girl or boy, as well as
relationships with each other. As a social construct, gender varies
from society to society and can change over time.
https://www.who.int/health-topics/gender
It's historically false and even today is inaccurate and
incomplete at best.
Knowledge about conception is recent too.
Bullshit.. we've understood the reasons for thousands of years if not
longer.
============
Why It Took Scientists So Long to Figure Out Where Babies Come From
Human conception was still basically a total mystery until as recently as 1875.
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:6602e9c1$0$2077923$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utuoj2$1sbs5$2@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...
"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
news:utuc7f $1pkpm$3@dont-email.me:
Bullshit yourself.
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:uttd51$1err8$3@dont-email.me...
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote in
news:Q_nMN.686852$xHn7.303646@fx14.iad:
On 3/24/2024 9:30 PM, Baxter wrote:
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote:That's only a recent hijacking and redefinition of the term.
Contrary to the oft-heard mantra, gender is NOT a social
construct.
==============
Gender refers to the characteristics of women, men, girls and
boys that are socially constructed. This includes norms,
behaviours and roles associated with being a woman, man, girl or
boy, as well as relationships with each other. As a social
construct, gender varies from society to society and can change
over time.
https://www.who.int/health-topics/gender
It's historically false and even today is inaccurate and
incomplete at best.
Knowledge about conception is recent too.
Bullshit.. we've understood the reasons for thousands of years if
not longer.
============
Why It Took Scientists So Long to Figure Out Where Babies Come From
Human conception was still basically a total mystery until as
recently as 1875.
https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/discovery-where-babies-come-from
============
Until 1875, no one in the world knew where babies come from. Ordinary
people didn?t know, and neither did the scientists who helped shape
the modern world. Leonardo da Vinci didn?t know, Galileo didn?t know,
Isaac Newton didn?t know.
They knew, that is, that men and women have sex and as a result,
sometimes, babies, but they did not know how those babies are
created. They did not know that women produce eggs, and when they
finally discovered sperm cells, they did not know that those wriggly
tadpoles had anything to do with babies and pregnancy. (The leading
theory was that they were parasites, perhaps related to the newly
discovered mini- creatures that swam in drops of pond water. This was
Newton?s view.)
https://observer.com/2017/06/the-story-of-the-quest-to-discover-where-
babies-come-from-family-history-reproduction-sex/
=================
So your "Personhood at point of conception" is recent and has NOT
been around for "thousands of years"
You are just trolling.
IOW, you hate science and history.
In article <utvbhf$2ba3d$2@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:6602e9c1$0$2077923$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utuoj2$1sbs5$2@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...
"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
news:utuc7f $1pkpm$3@dont-email.me:
Bullshit yourself.
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:uttd51$1err8$3@dont-email.me...
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote in
news:Q_nMN.686852$xHn7.303646@fx14.iad:
On 3/24/2024 9:30 PM, Baxter wrote:
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote:That's only a recent hijacking and redefinition of the term.
Contrary to the oft-heard mantra, gender is NOT a social
construct.
==============
Gender refers to the characteristics of women, men, girls and
boys that are socially constructed. This includes norms,
behaviours and roles associated with being a woman, man, girl or
boy, as well as relationships with each other. As a social
construct, gender varies from society to society and can change
over time.
https://www.who.int/health-topics/gender
It's historically false and even today is inaccurate and
incomplete at best.
Knowledge about conception is recent too.
Bullshit.. we've understood the reasons for thousands of years if
not longer.
============
Why It Took Scientists So Long to Figure Out Where Babies Come From
Human conception was still basically a total mystery until as
recently as 1875.
https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/discovery-where-babies-come-from
============
Until 1875, no one in the world knew where babies come from. Ordinary
people didn?t know, and neither did the scientists who helped shape
the modern world. Leonardo da Vinci didn?t know, Galileo didn?t know,
Isaac Newton didn?t know.
They knew, that is, that men and women have sex and as a result,
sometimes, babies, but they did not know how those babies are
created. They did not know that women produce eggs, and when they
finally discovered sperm cells, they did not know that those wriggly
tadpoles had anything to do with babies and pregnancy. (The leading
theory was that they were parasites, perhaps related to the newly
discovered mini- creatures that swam in drops of pond water. This was
Newton?s view.)
https://observer.com/2017/06/the-story-of-the-quest-to-discover-where-
babies-come-from-family-history-reproduction-sex/
=================
So your "Personhood at point of conception" is recent and has NOT
been around for "thousands of years"
You are just trolling.
IOW, you hate science and history.
Did I say that? Why know I didn't. But you did. Why do your type always assume?
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:6602df98$0$2130800$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <uttctu$1err8$1@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:ffb30jphkvfdf82rk1jtt5cs5f9ia9pnlo@4ax.com:
A baby born with only two fingers doesn't mean it's normal to only
have two fingers.
A baby born with only two fingers doesn't make it non-human, or
deserving of your hatred.
What hatred? It's still not normal.
Can't let them use the same bathrooms, sit at the same lunch counters,
etc.
In article <utuni8$1sbs5$1@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:6602df98$0$2130800$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <uttctu$1err8$1@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:ffb30jphkvfdf82rk1jtt5cs5f9ia9pnlo@4ax.com:
A baby born with only two fingers doesn't mean it's normal to only
have two fingers.
A baby born with only two fingers doesn't make it non-human, or
deserving of your hatred.
What hatred? It's still not normal.
Can't let them use the same bathrooms, sit at the same lunch counters,
etc.
A 2 fingered girl can use the womans bathroom and sit where ever she
wants. What's your point?
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:6602f4bf$0$3158697 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <20240326103610.568220c7@JA>, johnny@invalid.net says...the
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 08:21:41 -0700
Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 3/26/2024 7:45 AM, Mike Colangelo wrote:
On 3/25/2024 4:52 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/25/2024 4:45 PM, Mike Colangelo wrote:
On 3/24/2024 7:17 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/24/2024 7:08 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 07:08:42 -0400, Blue Lives Matter
<Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:02:54 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote in
news:VuGLN.723169$p%Mb.330709@fx15.iad:
On 3/23/2024 7:48 AM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <utlg6s$3d8um$3@dont-email.me>,
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
lloyd <lloyd@demon.net> wrote in
news:utl8jt$3avdt$2@news.mixmin.net:
On 22 Mar 2024, GEO <George@Foo.invalid> posted some
news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com>
wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip
fundPublic Schools of any ability to actually educate,
schools?We should take the federal government out of schools.those private schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing
they teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need to
wear a dress and make up.
Ain't that the truth? Especially in Oregon.
School vouchers be like:
'I don't like the public parks, so I want my kid to go to
the Country Club to play - and I want the Public Parks to
pay for it.'
'oh! and I want my property taxes reduced by not paying
for those public parks.'
Who said that? Why did they take trade classes out of the
schools?
According to the Constitution it doesn't belong there.
Where in the Constitution does it say anything about
Clause
Nowhere, Dummy, that's the point
Then there's no reason for the Federal government to not
participate in schools since isn't forbidden.
That's not the way federalism works. Congressional legislation
must be authorized by a power delineated in Article I (as well
as not prohibited by something like the First Amendment).
In this case, funding schools is authorized by the Taxing
thein Article I.
Funding schools is not anything for the general welfare.
From South Dakota v. Dole (1987):
"In considering whether a particular expenditure is intended to
serve general public purposes, courts should defer substantially
to the judgment of Congress. Helvering v. Davis, supra, at 301 U.
S. 640, 301 U. S. 645. {Footnote 2}: The level of deference to
fundingcongressional decision is such that the Court has more recently
questioned whether "general welfare" is a judicially enforceable
restriction at all.
So let's just pretend it's not in the Constitution at all.
Leaving the footnote aside, The Court argues it is following the
Constitution. But Congress makes the determination of whether
serves general public purposes, except when it is irrational to
believe it is.
It is rational to believe funding education promotes general public
purposes by providing for a better educated public.
The public is not better educated. Just the opposite.
You spelled indoctrinated wrong.
Go ahead, show us how schools indocrinate - do explain just how those materials taught indoctrinate.
Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote in news:utup64$1srn1$1@dont-email.me:
On 3/26/2024 1:24 AM, Blue Lives Matter wrote:
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 16:42:09 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 3/25/2024 4:33 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
On 3/24/2024 8:17 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
I'm sorry to learn you're that retarded.
funding schools is authorized by the Taxing Clause in Article I.
Me and the Supreme Court.
"The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes, duties,
imposts and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common
defense and general welfare of the United States."
SCOTUS has long established a broad Congressional power to spend for
the "general welfare." See United States v. Butler (1936), Helvering
v. Davis (1937), South Dakota v. Dole (1987).
Nothing about schools..
... or Social Security. But, the Court said in Butler no specific
mention is required.
Madison's position was specific mentions were required. Hamilton said
it wasn't. In Butler, the Court accepted Hamilton's view, and that
remains the law today.
There were a lot of things not dreampt of when the Constitution was
written. Perhaps you'd like to have NO interstate highways? Or air
travel? Or a host of other things we take for granted?
Johnny <johnny@invalid.net> wrote in news:20240326103610.568220c7@JA:
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 08:21:41 -0700Go ahead, support your claim. But do note that failures like your own glorous self do not disprove the benefit.
Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 3/26/2024 7:45 AM, Mike Colangelo wrote:
On 3/25/2024 4:52 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/25/2024 4:45 PM, Mike Colangelo wrote:
On 3/24/2024 7:17 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/24/2024 7:08 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 07:08:42 -0400, Blue Lives Matter
<Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:02:54 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote in
news:VuGLN.723169$p%Mb.330709@fx15.iad:
On 3/23/2024 7:48 AM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <utlg6s$3d8um$3@dont-email.me>,We should take the federal government out of schools.
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
lloyd <lloyd@demon.net> wrote in
news:utl8jt$3avdt$2@news.mixmin.net:
On 22 Mar 2024, GEO <George@Foo.invalid> posted some
news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com>
wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the
Public Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund
those private schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing
they teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need to
wear a dress and make up.
Ain't that the truth? Especially in Oregon.
School vouchers be like:
'I don't like the public parks, so I want my kid to go to
the Country Club to play - and I want the Public Parks to
pay for it.'
'oh! and I want my property taxes reduced by not paying
for those public parks.'
Who said that? Why did they take trade classes out of the
schools?
According to the Constitution it doesn't belong there.
Where in the Constitution does it say anything about schools?
Nowhere, Dummy, that's the point
Then there's no reason for the Federal government to not
participate in schools since isn't forbidden.
That's not the way federalism works. Congressional legislation
must be authorized by a power delineated in Article I (as well
as not prohibited by something like the First Amendment).
In this case, funding schools is authorized by the Taxing Clause
in Article I.
Funding schools is not anything for the general welfare.
 From South Dakota v. Dole (1987):
"In considering whether a particular expenditure is intended to
serve general public purposes, courts should defer substantially
to the judgment of Congress. Helvering v. Davis, supra, at 301 U.
S. 640, 301 U. S. 645. {Footnote 2}: The level of deference to the
congressional decision is such that the Court has more recently
questioned whether "general welfare" is a judicially enforceable
restriction at all.
So let's just pretend it's not in the Constitution at all.
Leaving the footnote aside, The Court argues it is following the
Constitution. But Congress makes the determination of whether funding
serves general public purposes, except when it is irrational to
believe it is.
It is rational to believe funding education promotes general public
purposes by providing for a better educated public.
The public is not better educated. Just the opposite.
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in news:c4l60jt0tjujc84ib1ghjri5m1610v0lvp@4ax.com:
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 20:33:51 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
There were a lot of things not dreampt of when the Constitution was >>>written. Perhaps you'd like to have NO interstate highways? Or air >>>travel? Or a host of other things we take for granted?
Yeah, but schools existed back when they wrote the Constitution and
the founders did not give the Feds power to control them.
==============
As George Washington ended his term as the first president of the United States, he left with a few parting words. Washington's Farewell Address
of 1796 delineated many of the recommendations Washington had for the
future of his country. Amongst these suggestions was a public education system. Washington instructed American leaders to "promote. institutions
for the general diffusion of knowledge. In proportion as the structure of
a government gives force to public opinion, it is essential that public opinion should be enlightened." Washington saw the importance of
educating the American public as a means to grow the country
economically, but also to create a well-informed populace to participate
in America's newly founded democracy.
https://ushistoryscene.com/article/rise-of-public-education/
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in news:c4l60jt0tjujc84ib1ghjri5m1610v0lvp@4ax.com:
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 20:33:51 -0000 (UTC), Baxterfor
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote in >>>news:utup64$1srn1$1@dont-email.me:
On 3/26/2024 1:24 AM, Blue Lives Matter wrote:
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 16:42:09 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 3/25/2024 4:33 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
On 3/24/2024 8:17 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
I'm sorry to learn you're that retarded.
funding schools is authorized by the Taxing Clause in Article I. >>>>>>>>
Me and the Supreme Court.
"The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes, duties,
imposts and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common
defense and general welfare of the United States."
SCOTUS has long established a broad Congressional power to spend
Helveringthe "general welfare." See United States v. Butler (1936),
v. Davis (1937), South Dakota v. Dole (1987).
Nothing about schools..
... or Social Security. But, the Court said in Butler no specific
mention is required.
Madison's position was specific mentions were required. Hamilton said
it wasn't. In Butler, the Court accepted Hamilton's view, and that
remains the law today.
There were a lot of things not dreampt of when the Constitution was >>>written. Perhaps you'd like to have NO interstate highways? Or air >>>travel? Or a host of other things we take for granted?
Yeah, but schools existed back when they wrote the Constitution and
the founders did not give the Feds power to control them.
At that time, there was a hodge-podge of schools - with only a fraction
of the populace being educated at all. And it became evident that such a system wasn't working. Then the State governments got involved, and
finally the Federal government. Why? Because it's to everyone's benefit that all kids receive the same quality/etc of education. And we're still working on that today.
Mike Colangelo <air@vatican_.con> wrote in news:MbEMN.105038$_a1e.20201@fx16.iad:
On 3/26/2024 8:21 AM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/26/2024 7:45 AM, Mike Colangelo wrote:
On 3/25/2024 4:52 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/25/2024 4:45 PM, Mike Colangelo wrote:
On 3/24/2024 7:17 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/24/2024 7:08 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 07:08:42 -0400, Blue Lives Matter
<Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:02:54 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote inNowhere, Dummy, that's the point
news:VuGLN.723169$p%Mb.330709@fx15.iad:
On 3/23/2024 7:48 AM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <utlg6s$3d8um$3@dont-email.me>,We should take the federal government out of schools.Â
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
lloyd <lloyd@demon.net> wrote in
news:utl8jt$3avdt$2@news.mixmin.net:
On 22 Mar 2024, GEO <George@Foo.invalid> posted some >>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Public Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those private schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they teach is that if you are male you are female and you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> need to wear a dress and make up.
Ain't that the truth? Especially in Oregon.
School vouchers be like:
'I don't like the public parks, so I want my kid to go to >>>>>>>>>>>>> the Country Club to play - and I want the Public Parks to >>>>>>>>>>>>> pay for it.' 'oh! and I want my property taxes reduced by >>>>>>>>>>>>> not paying for those public parks.'
Who said that? Why did they take trade classes out of the >>>>>>>>>>>> schools?
According to the Constitution it doesn't belong there.
Where in the Constitution does it say anything about schools? >>>>>>>>>
Then there's no reason for the Federal government to not
participate in schools since isn't forbidden.
That's not the way federalism works. Congressional legislation
must be authorized by a power delineated in Article I (as well as >>>>>>> not prohibited by something like the First Amendment).
In this case, funding schools is authorized by the Taxing Clause >>>>>>> in Article I.
Funding schools is not anything for the general welfare.
 From South Dakota v. Dole (1987):
"In considering whether a particular expenditure is intended to
serve general public purposes, courts should defer substantially to
the judgment of Congress. Helvering v. Davis, supra, at 301 U. S.
640, 301 U. S. 645. {Footnote 2}: The level of deference to the
congressional decision is such that the Court has more recently
questioned whether "general welfare" is a judicially enforceable
restriction at all.
So let's just pretend it's not in the Constitution at all.
Leaving the footnote aside, The Court argues it is following the
Constitution.
That argument can only be made by slimy sophists. The framers
definitely did not anticipate or want the federal government to be
doing the bulk of what it currently does.
The frimers of the Constitution had no inkling of things to come.
There's this thing called "progress" that you absolutely hate.
In article <utvbr5$2ba3d$5@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Mike Colangelo <air@vatican_.con> wrote in
news:MbEMN.105038$_a1e.20201@fx16.iad:
On 3/26/2024 8:21 AM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/26/2024 7:45 AM, Mike Colangelo wrote:
On 3/25/2024 4:52 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/25/2024 4:45 PM, Mike Colangelo wrote:
On 3/24/2024 7:17 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/24/2024 7:08 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 07:08:42 -0400, Blue Lives Matter
<Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:02:54 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote in
news:VuGLN.723169$p%Mb.330709@fx15.iad:
On 3/23/2024 7:48 AM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <utlg6s$3d8um$3@dont-email.me>,We should take the federal government out of schools.Â
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
lloyd <lloyd@demon.net> wrote in
news:utl8jt$3avdt$2@news.mixmin.net:
On 22 Mar 2024, GEO <George@Foo.invalid> posted some
news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com>
wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the
Public Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund
those private schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing
they teach is that if you are male you are female and you
need to wear a dress and make up.
Ain't that the truth? Especially in Oregon.
School vouchers be like:
'I don't like the public parks, so I want my kid to go to
the Country Club to play - and I want the Public Parks to
pay for it.' 'oh! and I want my property taxes reduced by
not paying for those public parks.'
Who said that? Why did they take trade classes out of the
schools?
According to the Constitution it doesn't belong there.
Where in the Constitution does it say anything about schools?
Nowhere, Dummy, that's the point
Then there's no reason for the Federal government to not
participate in schools since isn't forbidden.
That's not the way federalism works. Congressional legislation
must be authorized by a power delineated in Article I (as well as
not prohibited by something like the First Amendment).
In this case, funding schools is authorized by the Taxing Clause
in Article I.
Funding schools is not anything for the general welfare.
 From South Dakota v. Dole (1987):
"In considering whether a particular expenditure is intended to
serve general public purposes, courts should defer substantially to
the judgment of Congress. Helvering v. Davis, supra, at 301 U. S.
640, 301 U. S. 645. {Footnote 2}: The level of deference to the
congressional decision is such that the Court has more recently
questioned whether "general welfare" is a judicially enforceable
restriction at all.
So let's just pretend it's not in the Constitution at all.
Leaving the footnote aside, The Court argues it is following the
Constitution.
That argument can only be made by slimy sophists. The framers
definitely did not anticipate or want the federal government to be
doing the bulk of what it currently does.
The frimers of the Constitution had no inkling of things to come.
There's this thing called "progress" that you absolutely hate.
Assuming again?
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 08:21:33 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 3/26/2024 1:24 AM, Blue Lives Matter wrote:
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 16:42:09 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 3/25/2024 4:33 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
On 3/24/2024 8:17 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
I'm sorry to learn you're that retarded.
funding schools is authorized by the Taxing Clause in Article I.
Me and the Supreme Court.
"The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes, duties,
imposts
and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common defense and
general welfare of the United States."
SCOTUS has long established a broad Congressional power to spend for
the
"general welfare." See United States v. Butler (1936), Helvering v.
Davis (1937), South Dakota v. Dole (1987).
Nothing about schools..
... or Social Security. But, the Court said in Butler no specific
mention is required.
So you believe the federals have free rein. Why am I not surprised...
Madison's position was specific mentions were required. Hamilton said it >>wasn't. In Butler, the Court accepted Hamilton's view, and that remains
the law today.
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote in news:fkIMN.127072$6ePe.65484
@fx42.iad:
On 3/25/2024 8:50 PM, Baxter wrote:
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote:Only if recent means since the dawn of history.
On 3/24/2024 9:30 PM, Baxter wrote:Knowledge about conception is recent too.
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote:That's only a recent hijacking and redefinition of the term.
Gender refers to the characteristics of women, men, girls and boysContrary to the oft-heard mantra, gender is NOT a social construct. >>>>> ==============
that are socially constructed. This includes norms, behaviours and
roles associated with being a woman, man, girl or boy, as well as
relationships with each other. As a social construct, gender varies
from society to society and can change over time.
https://www.who.int/health-topics/gender
It's historically false and even today is inaccurate and
incomplete at best.
So History began in the lates 1700's?!! It wasn't until 1776 that they
found out that sperm were involved in reporduction. And another 100
years after that before they figured out the sperm fertilzed the egg.
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:66034aa1$0$3158691$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utvbhf$2ba3d$2@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:6602e9c1$0$2077923$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <utuoj2$1sbs5$2@dont-email.me>,
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
news:utuc7f $1pkpm$3@dont-email.me:
Bullshit yourself.
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:uttd51$1err8$3@dont-email.me...
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote in
news:Q_nMN.686852$xHn7.303646@fx14.iad:
On 3/24/2024 9:30 PM, Baxter wrote:
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote:That's only a recent hijacking and redefinition of the term.
Contrary to the oft-heard mantra, gender is NOT a social
construct.
==============
Gender refers to the characteristics of women, men, girls and
boys that are socially constructed. This includes norms,
behaviours and roles associated with being a woman, man, girl
or boy, as well as relationships with each other. As a social
construct, gender varies from society to society and can
change over time.
https://www.who.int/health-topics/gender
It's historically false and even today is inaccurate and
incomplete at best.
Knowledge about conception is recent too.
Bullshit.. we've understood the reasons for thousands of years
if not longer.
============
Why It Took Scientists So Long to Figure Out Where Babies Come
From
Human conception was still basically a total mystery until as
recently as 1875.
https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/discovery-where-babies-come-f
rom
============
Until 1875, no one in the world knew where babies come from.
Ordinary people didn?t know, and neither did the scientists who
helped shape the modern world. Leonardo da Vinci didn?t know,
Galileo didn?t know, Isaac Newton didn?t know.
They knew, that is, that men and women have sex and as a result,
sometimes, babies, but they did not know how those babies are
created. They did not know that women produce eggs, and when they
finally discovered sperm cells, they did not know that those
wriggly tadpoles had anything to do with babies and pregnancy.
(The leading theory was that they were parasites, perhaps related
to the newly discovered mini- creatures that swam in drops of pond
water. This was Newton?s view.)
https://observer.com/2017/06/the-story-of-the-quest-to-discover-whe
re- babies-come-from-family-history-reproduction-sex/
=================
So your "Personhood at point of conception" is recent and has NOT
been around for "thousands of years"
You are just trolling.
IOW, you hate science and history.
Did I say that?
Yeah - when you said "trolling". I present science and history and you
call it "trolling"
Why know I didn't. But you did. Why do your type
always assume?
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 02:31:53 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>news:c4l60jt0tjujc84ib1ghjri5m1610v0lvp@4ax.com:
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 20:33:51 -0000 (UTC), Baxterfor
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote in >>>>news:utup64$1srn1$1@dont-email.me:
On 3/26/2024 1:24 AM, Blue Lives Matter wrote:
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 16:42:09 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 3/25/2024 4:33 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
On 3/24/2024 8:17 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
I'm sorry to learn you're that retarded.
funding schools is authorized by the Taxing Clause in Article >>>>>>>>> I.
Me and the Supreme Court.
"The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes, duties, >>>>>>> imposts and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common >>>>>>> defense and general welfare of the United States."
SCOTUS has long established a broad Congressional power to spend
Helveringthe "general welfare." See United States v. Butler (1936),
v. Davis (1937), South Dakota v. Dole (1987).
Nothing about schools..
... or Social Security. But, the Court said in Butler no specific
mention is required.
Madison's position was specific mentions were required. Hamilton
said it wasn't. In Butler, the Court accepted Hamilton's view, and
that remains the law today.
There were a lot of things not dreampt of when the Constitution was >>>>written. Perhaps you'd like to have NO interstate highways? Or air >>>>travel? Or a host of other things we take for granted?
Yeah, but schools existed back when they wrote the Constitution and
the founders did not give the Feds power to control them.
At that time, there was a hodge-podge of schools - with only a
fraction of the populace being educated at all. And it became evident
that such a system wasn't working.
At least, in your addled brain....
Then the State governments got involved,
AS they should...
and
finally the Federal government.
Even though they had no Constitutional power to do so...
Why? Because it's to everyone's benefit
that all kids receive the same quality/etc of education.
Not exactly, it should be about recieving a high quality education,
not just the same....
And we're still
working on that today.
Indeed..
https://thehill.com/opinion/education/579750-many-of-americas-black-you ths-cannot-read-or-do-math-and-that-imperils-us/
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >news:ris70j5f05ip8h4ptc0eru3340if39j5vs@4ax.com:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 02:31:53 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>news:c4l60jt0tjujc84ib1ghjri5m1610v0lvp@4ax.com:
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 20:33:51 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote in >>>>>news:utup64$1srn1$1@dont-email.me:
On 3/26/2024 1:24 AM, Blue Lives Matter wrote:
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 16:42:09 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 3/25/2024 4:33 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
On 3/24/2024 8:17 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
I'm sorry to learn you're that retarded.
funding schools is authorized by the Taxing Clause in Article >>>>>>>>>> I.
Me and the Supreme Court.
"The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes, duties, >>>>>>>> imposts and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common >>>>>>>> defense and general welfare of the United States."
SCOTUS has long established a broad Congressional power to spend >>>for
the "general welfare." See United States v. Butler (1936), >>>Helvering
v. Davis (1937), South Dakota v. Dole (1987).
Nothing about schools..
... or Social Security. But, the Court said in Butler no specific
mention is required.
Madison's position was specific mentions were required. Hamilton
said it wasn't. In Butler, the Court accepted Hamilton's view, and >>>>>> that remains the law today.
There were a lot of things not dreampt of when the Constitution was >>>>>written. Perhaps you'd like to have NO interstate highways? Or air >>>>>travel? Or a host of other things we take for granted?
Yeah, but schools existed back when they wrote the Constitution and
the founders did not give the Feds power to control them.
At that time, there was a hodge-podge of schools - with only a
fraction of the populace being educated at all. And it became evident >>>that such a system wasn't working.
At least, in your addled brain....
Read your history.
Then the State governments got involved,
AS they should...
Strange - you say State big government should get involved but not National >government!
and
finally the Federal government.
Even though they had no Constitutional power to do so...
So each State should have completely separate educational systems? And you don't see
a problem?
Why? Because it's to everyone's benefit
that all kids receive the same quality/etc of education.
Not exactly, it should be about recieving a high quality education,
not just the same....
What?!! You want 50 different versions of History?
50 different versions of how to
do math? 50 different versions of Grammer?
And we're still
working on that today.
Indeed..
Florida is teaching a different history. And Texas a still different one too.
https://thehill.com/opinion/education/579750-many-of-americas-black-youLocal education has failed them.
ths-cannot-read-or-do-math-and-that-imperils-us/
That article is a call for MORE involvement of the
Federal government - not less.
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote:
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 20:33:51 -0000 (UTC), Baxter wrote:
There were a lot of things not dreampt of when the Constitution was
written. Perhaps you'd like to have NO interstate highways? Or air
travel? Or a host of other things we take for granted?
Yeah, but schools existed back when they wrote the Constitution and
the founders did not give the Feds power to control them.
==============
As George Washington ended his term as the first president of the United States, he left with a few parting words. Washington’s Farewell Address
of 1796 delineated many of the recommendations Washington had for the
future of his country. Amongst these suggestions was a public education system. Washington instructed American leaders to “promote… institutions for the general diffusion of knowledge. In proportion as the structure of
a government gives force to public opinion, it is essential that public opinion should be enlightened.†Washington saw the importance of
educating the American public as a means to grow the country
economically, but also to create a well-informed populace to participate
in America’s newly founded democracy.
https://ushistoryscene.com/article/rise-of-public-education/
AS they should...
Strange - you say State big government should get involved but not National government!
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in news:ris70j5f05ip8h4ptc0eru3340if39j5vs@4ax.com:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 02:31:53 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:c4l60jt0tjujc84ib1ghjri5m1610v0lvp@4ax.com:
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 20:33:51 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote in
news:utup64$1srn1$1@dont-email.me:
On 3/26/2024 1:24 AM, Blue Lives Matter wrote:
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 16:42:09 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 3/25/2024 4:33 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
On 3/24/2024 8:17 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
funding schools is authorized by the Taxing Clause in Article I.
I'm sorry to learn you're that retarded.
Me and the Supreme Court.
"The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes,
duties, imposts and excises, to pay the debts and provide for
the common defense and general welfare of the United States."
SCOTUS has long established a broad Congressional power to spend for >>>>>>>> the "general welfare." See United States v. Butler (1936), Helvering >>>>>>>> v. Davis (1937), South Dakota v. Dole (1987).
Nothing about schools..
... or Social Security. But, the Court said in Butler no specific
mention is required.
Madison's position was specific mentions were required. Hamilton
said it wasn't. In Butler, the Court accepted Hamilton's view,
and that remains the law today.
There were a lot of things not dreampt of when the Constitution
was written. Perhaps you'd like to have NO interstate highways?
Or air travel? Or a host of other things we take for granted?
Yeah, but schools existed back when they wrote the Constitution and
the founders did not give the Feds power to control them.
At that time, there was a hodge-podge of schools - with only a
fraction of the populace being educated at all. And it became
evident that such a system wasn't working.
At least, in your addled brain....
Read your history.
Then the State governments got involved,
AS they should...
Strange - you say State big government should get involved but not
National government!
and finally the Federal government.
Even though they had no Constitutional power to do so...
So each State should have completely separate educational systems?
And you don't see a problem?
Why? Because it's to everyone's benefit
that all kids receive the same quality/etc of education.
Not exactly, it should be about recieving a high quality education,
not just the same....
What?!! You want 50 different versions of History? 50 different
versions of how to do math? 50 different versions of Grammer?
And we're still working on that today.
Indeed..
Florida is teaching a different history. And Texas a still different
one too.
In news:uu1c4j$2t8t5$2@dont-email.me, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> >typed:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:ris70j5f05ip8h4ptc0eru3340if39j5vs@4ax.com:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 02:31:53 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:c4l60jt0tjujc84ib1ghjri5m1610v0lvp@4ax.com:
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 20:33:51 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote in
news:utup64$1srn1$1@dont-email.me:
On 3/26/2024 1:24 AM, Blue Lives Matter wrote:
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 16:42:09 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 3/25/2024 4:33 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
On 3/24/2024 8:17 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
funding schools is authorized by the Taxing Clause in Article I.
I'm sorry to learn you're that retarded.
Me and the Supreme Court.
"The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes,
duties, imposts and excises, to pay the debts and provide for >>>>>>>>> the common defense and general welfare of the United States."
SCOTUS has long established a broad Congressional power to spend for >>>>>>>>> the "general welfare." See United States v. Butler (1936), Helvering >>>>>>>>> v. Davis (1937), South Dakota v. Dole (1987).
Nothing about schools..
... or Social Security. But, the Court said in Butler no specific >>>>>>> mention is required.
Madison's position was specific mentions were required. Hamilton >>>>>>> said it wasn't. In Butler, the Court accepted Hamilton's view,
and that remains the law today.
There were a lot of things not dreampt of when the Constitution
was written. Perhaps you'd like to have NO interstate highways?
Or air travel? Or a host of other things we take for granted?
Yeah, but schools existed back when they wrote the Constitution and
the founders did not give the Feds power to control them.
At that time, there was a hodge-podge of schools - with only a
fraction of the populace being educated at all. And it became
evident that such a system wasn't working.
At least, in your addled brain....
Read your history.
Have you read the Federalist Papers? Easy reading, right? Just zip right through
them....
"The Federalist Papers is a collection of 85 articles and essays written by >Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay under the collective pseudonym >"Publius" to promote the ratification of the Constitution of the United States.
The collection was commonly known as The Federalist until the name The >Federalist Papers emerged in the twentieth century.
"The first seventy-seven of these essays were published serially in the >Independent Journal, the New York Packet, and The Daily Advertiser between >October 1787 and April 1788... The last eight papers (Nos. 78-85) were >republished in the New York newspapers between June 14 and August 16, 1788.
"The authors of The Federalist intended to influence the voters to ratify the >Constitution...."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federalist_papers
In other words, they were written for the common man to comprehend and >contemplate.
Many high school seniors would struggle to make it through one today.
Then the State governments got involved,
AS they should...
Strange - you say State big government should get involved but not
National government!
Which is more responsive to its residents?
and finally the Federal government.
Even though they had no Constitutional power to do so...
So each State should have completely separate educational systems?
And you don't see a problem?
That's a feature, not a bug.
Why? Because it's to everyone's benefit
that all kids receive the same quality/etc of education.
Not exactly, it should be about recieving a high quality education,
not just the same....
What?!! You want 50 different versions of History? 50 different
versions of how to do math? 50 different versions of Grammer?
May the best version win!
And we're still working on that today.
Indeed..
Florida is teaching a different history. And Texas a still different
one too.
Teaching a different history or teaching history differently?
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 11:39:17 -0700, "max headroom"
<maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote:
In news:uu1c4j$2t8t5$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Florida is teaching a different history. And Texas a still
different one too.
Teaching a different history or teaching history differently?
Good golly, miss Molly, teaching a different version of history than
what the federal government wants taught?
Slap your little fingers with a ruler.
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 14:57:23 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>news:ris70j5f05ip8h4ptc0eru3340if39j5vs@4ax.com:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 02:31:53 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>news:c4l60jt0tjujc84ib1ghjri5m1610v0lvp@4ax.com:
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 20:33:51 -0000 (UTC), Baxterfor
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote in >>>>>>news:utup64$1srn1$1@dont-email.me:
On 3/26/2024 1:24 AM, Blue Lives Matter wrote:
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 16:42:09 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 3/25/2024 4:33 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
On 3/24/2024 8:17 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
I'm sorry to learn you're that retarded.
funding schools is authorized by the Taxing Clause in
Article I.
Me and the Supreme Court.
"The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes,
duties, imposts and excises, to pay the debts and provide for >>>>>>>>> the common defense and general welfare of the United States." >>>>>>>>>
SCOTUS has long established a broad Congressional power to
spend
the "general welfare." See United States v. Butler (1936), >>>>Helvering
v. Davis (1937), South Dakota v. Dole (1987).
Nothing about schools..
... or Social Security. But, the Court said in Butler no
specific mention is required.
Madison's position was specific mentions were required. Hamilton >>>>>>> said it wasn't. In Butler, the Court accepted Hamilton's view,
and that remains the law today.
There were a lot of things not dreampt of when the Constitution
was written. Perhaps you'd like to have NO interstate highways?
Or air travel? Or a host of other things we take for granted?
Yeah, but schools existed back when they wrote the Constitution
and the founders did not give the Feds power to control them.
At that time, there was a hodge-podge of schools - with only a
fraction of the populace being educated at all. And it became
evident that such a system wasn't working.
At least, in your addled brain....
Read your history.
No surprise that you can't back up your claim.
Then the State governments got involved,
AS they should...
Strange - you say State big government should get involved but not
National government!
Absolutely, because the states have a legal right to do so.
and
finally the Federal government.
Even though they had no Constitutional power to do so...
So each State should have completely separate educational systems? And
you don't see a problem?
No. What problems do YOU see?
Why? Because it's to everyone's benefit
that all kids receive the same quality/etc of education.
Not exactly, it should be about recieving a high quality education,
not just the same....
What?!! You want 50 different versions of History?
That happens already, Dumbass.
50 different versions of how to
do math? 50 different versions of Grammer?
And we're still
working on that today.
Indeed..
Florida is teaching a different history. And Texas a still different
one too.
Many Universities teach different versions of history...
https://thehill.com/opinion/education/579750-many-of-americas-black-yLocal education has failed them.
ou ths-cannot-read-or-do-math-and-that-imperils-us/
*Public* local education has failed....
That article is a call for MORE involvement of the
Federal government - not less.
The public school system has gone steaduly downhill since the feds got involved
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in news:gp190j1k98rf5ttbm7pehv8p072qir1sjb@4ax.com:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 11:39:17 -0700, "max headroom"
<maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote:
In news:uu1c4j$2t8t5$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Florida is teaching a different history. And Texas a still
different one too.
Teaching a different history or teaching history differently?
Florida is teaching a different, inaccurate version of history
Good golly, miss Molly, teaching a different version of history than
what the federal government wants taught?
Slap your little fingers with a ruler.
The goal is an accurate history - not revisionist propaganda.
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >news:gp190j1k98rf5ttbm7pehv8p072qir1sjb@4ax.com:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 11:39:17 -0700, "max headroom"
<maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote:
In news:uu1c4j$2t8t5$2@dont-email.me, Baxter >>><bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Florida is teaching a different history. And Texas a still
different one too.
Teaching a different history or teaching history differently?
Florida is teaching a different, inaccurate version of history
Good golly, miss Molly, teaching a different version of history thanThe goal is an accurate history - not revisionist propaganda.
what the federal government wants taught?
Slap your little fingers with a ruler.
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >news:qnd80jp04ebeequ4f2jeo7tareo2fpdbpm@4ax.com:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 14:57:23 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>news:ris70j5f05ip8h4ptc0eru3340if39j5vs@4ax.com:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 02:31:53 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>news:c4l60jt0tjujc84ib1ghjri5m1610v0lvp@4ax.com:
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 20:33:51 -0000 (UTC), Baxterfor
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote in >>>>>>>news:utup64$1srn1$1@dont-email.me:
On 3/26/2024 1:24 AM, Blue Lives Matter wrote:
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 16:42:09 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 3/25/2024 4:33 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
On 3/24/2024 8:17 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
I'm sorry to learn you're that retarded.
funding schools is authorized by the Taxing Clause in
Article I.
Me and the Supreme Court.
"The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes,
duties, imposts and excises, to pay the debts and provide for >>>>>>>>>> the common defense and general welfare of the United States." >>>>>>>>>>
SCOTUS has long established a broad Congressional power to >>>>>>>>>> spend
the "general welfare." See United States v. Butler (1936), >>>>>Helvering
v. Davis (1937), South Dakota v. Dole (1987).
Nothing about schools..
... or Social Security. But, the Court said in Butler no
specific mention is required.
Madison's position was specific mentions were required. Hamilton >>>>>>>> said it wasn't. In Butler, the Court accepted Hamilton's view, >>>>>>>> and that remains the law today.
There were a lot of things not dreampt of when the Constitution >>>>>>>was written. Perhaps you'd like to have NO interstate highways? >>>>>>>Or air travel? Or a host of other things we take for granted?
Yeah, but schools existed back when they wrote the Constitution
and the founders did not give the Feds power to control them.
At that time, there was a hodge-podge of schools - with only a >>>>>fraction of the populace being educated at all. And it became
evident that such a system wasn't working.
At least, in your addled brain....
Read your history.
No surprise that you can't back up your claim.
IOW, your fingers are broken.
Start with: https://www.history.com/news/13-colonies-school
Then the State governments got involved,
AS they should...
Strange - you say State big government should get involved but not >>>National government!
Absolutely, because the states have a legal right to do so.
You got anything to back up that claim? Like reference specific State >Constitution passages? And ALL States?
and
finally the Federal government.
Even though they had no Constitutional power to do so...
So each State should have completely separate educational systems? And >>>you don't see a problem?
No. What problems do YOU see?
I see an uneducated public. I see citizens of one State unable to
understand citizens of other States. How can you have an Informed Public
if every State is teaching their kids entirely different
subjects,history, methods, etc.?
Why? Because it's to everyone's benefit
that all kids receive the same quality/etc of education.
Not exactly, it should be about recieving a high quality education,
not just the same....
What?!! You want 50 different versions of History?
That happens already, Dumbass.
No, while we do have some different versions of history being taught, we >don't have 50 different versions. And clearly it would be to our benefit
to have ONE version of history (subject to review/new findings).
50 different versions of how to
do math? 50 different versions of Grammer?
And we're still
working on that today.
Indeed..
Florida is teaching a different history. And Texas a still different
one too.
Many Universities teach different versions of history...
Go ahead, give examples.
https://thehill.com/opinion/education/579750-many-of-americas-black-yLocal education has failed them.
ou ths-cannot-read-or-do-math-and-that-imperils-us/
*Public* local education has failed....
You conservaturds have certainly been trying to kill it for a long time.
Nope.That article is a call for MORE involvement of the
Federal government - not less.
The public school system has gone steaduly downhill since the feds got
involved
On 3/27/2024 3:14 PM, Blue Lives Matter wrote:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 21:32:46 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:qnd80jp04ebeequ4f2jeo7tareo2fpdbpm@4ax.com:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 14:57:23 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
{snip}
Strange - you say State big government should get involved but not
National government!
Absolutely, because the states have a legal right to do so.
You got anything to back up that claim? Like reference specific State
Constitution passages? And ALL States?
I was talking about the legal rights specified in the 10th Amendment.
Again, SCOTUS has said the feds have a very broad power to spend on the >general welfare, and that almost certainly includes education.
Of course you (and Johnny, Skeeter, Scout and Rudy) disagree with
SCOTUS. But, they have the last say on how to interpret the 10th Amendment.
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 21:32:46 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:qnd80jp04ebeequ4f2jeo7tareo2fpdbpm@4ax.com:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 14:57:23 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Strange - you say State big government should get involved but not
National government!
Absolutely, because the states have a legal right to do so.
You got anything to back up that claim? Like reference specific State
Constitution passages? And ALL States?
I was talking about the legal rights specified in the 10th Amendment.
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 15:31:09 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
Again, SCOTUS has said the feds have a very broad power to spend on the
general welfare, and that almost certainly includes education.
According to you, anyway....
Of course you (and Johnny, Skeeter, Scout and Rudy) disagree with
SCOTUS. But, they have the last say on how to interpret the 10th Amendment.
...and I have the freedom to say they are wrong to allow the Feds to interfere with education.
On 3/27/2024 3:38 PM, Blue Lives Matter wrote:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 15:31:09 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
{snip}
Again, SCOTUS has said the feds have a very broad power to spend on the
general welfare, and that almost certainly includes education.
According to you, anyway....
Of course you (and Johnny, Skeeter, Scout and Rudy) disagree with...and I have the freedom to say they are wrong to allow the Feds to
SCOTUS. But, they have the last say on how to interpret the 10th Amendment. >>
interfere with education.
How about Social Security? Does that violate the 10th Amendment in your >opinion?
In news:uu1c4j$2t8t5$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Strange - you say State big government should get involved but not
National government!
Which is more responsive to its residents?
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message >news:utlfma$3d8um$1@dont-email.me...
GEO <George@Foo.invalid> wrote in news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public
Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private
schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a dress
and make up.
More conservaturd propaganda.
So, schools are NOT encouraging transgenderism?
Even going to far as to keep parents ignorant of what their child is doing
in school?
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 15:42:30 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 3/27/2024 3:38 PM, Blue Lives Matter wrote:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 15:31:09 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
{snip}
Again, SCOTUS has said the feds have a very broad power to spend on the >>>> general welfare, and that almost certainly includes education.
According to you, anyway....
Of course you (and Johnny, Skeeter, Scout and Rudy) disagree with
SCOTUS. But, they have the last say on how to interpret the 10th Amendment.
...and I have the freedom to say they are wrong to allow the Feds to
interfere with education.
How about Social Security? Does that violate the 10th Amendment in your
opinion?
I don't know. I never gave it any thought.
In article <uu1c4j$2t8t5$2@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
AS they should...
Strange - you say State big government should get involved but not National >> government!
Tell us the difference.
BTW, I'm also not going to vote for anyone who be believes we should
let the federal government decide what news we can or can't see/hear.
Fact is that I don't trust the federal for much of anything these
days.
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 21:32:46 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Start with: https://www.history.com/news/13-colonies-school
I'm not interested in what some guy I never heard of named named Dave
Roos wrote
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 15:31:09 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 3/27/2024 3:14 PM, Blue Lives Matter wrote:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 21:32:46 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:qnd80jp04ebeequ4f2jeo7tareo2fpdbpm@4ax.com:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 14:57:23 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
{snip}
Strange - you say State big government should get involved but
not National government!
Absolutely, because the states have a legal right to do so.
You got anything to back up that claim? Like reference specific
State Constitution passages? And ALL States?
I was talking about the legal rights specified in the 10th
Amendment.
Again, SCOTUS has said the feds have a very broad power to spend on
the general welfare, and that almost certainly includes education.
According to you, anyway....
Of course you (and Johnny, Skeeter, Scout and Rudy) disagree with
SCOTUS. But, they have the last say on how to interpret the 10th
Amendment.
...and I have the freedom to say they are wrong to allow the Feds to interfere with education.
FWIW, I remember disagreeing with their decison on Roe vs Wade.
On 3/27/2024 11:42 AM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <uu1c4j$2t8t5$2@dont-email.me>,Go do some studying on nationalism in the USA and how the states
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
AS they should...
Strange - you say State big government should get involved but not
National government!
Tell us the difference.
created a federal government of limited powers, reserving to
themselves those governmental powers the states did not delegate
to the central government.
On 3/27/2024 3:44 PM, Blue Lives Matter wrote:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 15:42:30 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 3/27/2024 3:38 PM, Blue Lives Matter wrote:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 15:31:09 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
{snip}
Again, SCOTUS has said the feds have a very broad power to spend on the >>>>> general welfare, and that almost certainly includes education.
According to you, anyway....
Of course you (and Johnny, Skeeter, Scout and Rudy) disagree with
SCOTUS. But, they have the last say on how to interpret the 10th Amendment.
...and I have the freedom to say they are wrong to allow the Feds to
interfere with education.
How about Social Security? Does that violate the 10th Amendment in your
opinion?
I don't know. I never gave it any thought.
It's an important case to test whether funding education violates the 10th Amendment.
As I understand your argument, federal funding of education is prohibited by the
10th Amendment because the Constitution does not explicitly grant the federal government the power to fund education.
If we accept your argument, then it would seem to follow that Social Security -
which is also not explicitly authorized by the Constitution must also violate the 10th Amendment.
On 3/27/2024 3:38 PM, Blue Lives Matter wrote:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 15:31:09 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
{snip}
Again, SCOTUS has said the feds have a very broad power to spend on the
general welfare, and that almost certainly includes education.
According to you, anyway....
Of course you (and Johnny, Skeeter, Scout and Rudy) disagree with...and I have the freedom to say they are wrong to allow the Feds to
SCOTUS. But, they have the last say on how to interpret the 10th Amendment. >>
interfere with education.
How about Social Security? Does that violate the 10th Amendment in your opinion?
On 2024-03-27 18:39:17 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu1c4j$2t8t5$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Strange - you say State big government should get involved but not
National government!
Which is more responsive to its residents?
In my state they're more responsive to outside special interest groups
backed by billionaires like the Kochs, like those who crammed a school voucher with public funding program down their throats on the threat
of throwing a lot of money into campaigns to primary them.
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 08:03:27 -0400, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:utlfma$3d8um$1@dont-email.me...
GEO <George@Foo.invalid> wrote in news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public
Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private
schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a dress
and make up.
More conservaturd propaganda.
So, schools are NOT encouraging transgenderism?
Even going to far as to keep parents ignorant of what their child is
doing in school?
No schools are not encouraging cross dressing. They just believe in
freedom for the student to express themselves. Should the school
forbid kids from singing the star spangled banner, if they want to?
No, it's a free country. Only about 0.5% of the population is into
cross dressing.
Relax.
In news:uu285g$348lv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-27 18:39:17 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu1c4j$2t8t5$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Strange - you say State big government should get involved but not
National government!
Which is more responsive to its residents?
In my state they're more responsive to outside special interest groups
backed by billionaires like the Kochs, like those who crammed a school
voucher with public funding program down their throats on the threat
of throwing a lot of money into campaigns to primary them.
Wow, public funding-- funds taken from the public
and used to pay for
schooling. Is that a problem?
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >news:nn590jlng5a2mspus759345k0efg68og9i@4ax.com:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 21:32:46 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Start with: https://www.history.com/news/13-colonies-school
I'm not interested in what some guy I never heard of named named Dave
Roos wrote
You got your religion and you're not open to facts.
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >news:l0590j1l2vs80i1mtb1e45t1a7ssdmm6ja@4ax.com:
BTW, I'm also not going to vote for anyone who be believes we should
let the federal government decide what news we can or can't see/hear.
Fact is that I don't trust the federal for much of anything these
days.
===========
History of Federal involvement in Education
The Supreme Court’s 1954 Brown v. Board of Education decision mandated
the desegregation of public schools and gave the executive branch a legal >precedent for enforcing equal access to education.
The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) of 1965 was a key part
of Lyndon Johnson’s War on Poverty and has set the basic terms of the
federal government’s involvement in education ever since. Rather than >mandating direct federal oversight of schools, ESEA offered states
funding for education programs on a conditional basis. In other words,
states could receive federal funding provided they met the requirements >outlined in certain sections, or titles, of the act. Every major
education initiative since then has been about recalibrating the balance >first struck by ESEA. Until 1980, the program was reauthorized every
three years, each time with more specific guidelines about how federal
funds were to be used.
https://capta.org/role-of-federal-government-in-education/
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >news:tp790jpnmvt1ns41ttbddeq81pf0n64jtl@4ax.com:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 15:31:09 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 3/27/2024 3:14 PM, Blue Lives Matter wrote:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 21:32:46 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:qnd80jp04ebeequ4f2jeo7tareo2fpdbpm@4ax.com:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 14:57:23 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
{snip}
Strange - you say State big government should get involved but
not National government!
Absolutely, because the states have a legal right to do so.
You got anything to back up that claim? Like reference specific
State Constitution passages? And ALL States?
I was talking about the legal rights specified in the 10th
Amendment.
Again, SCOTUS has said the feds have a very broad power to spend on
the general welfare, and that almost certainly includes education.
According to you, anyway....
Of course you (and Johnny, Skeeter, Scout and Rudy) disagree with
SCOTUS. But, they have the last say on how to interpret the 10th >>>Amendment.
...and I have the freedom to say they are wrong to allow the Feds to
interfere with education.
FWIW, I remember disagreeing with their decison on Roe vs Wade.
=============
History of Federal involvement in Education
The Supreme Court’s 1954 Brown v. Board of Education decision mandated
the desegregation of public schools and gave the executive branch a legal >precedent for enforcing equal access to education.
The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) of 1965 was a key part
of Lyndon Johnson’s War on Poverty and has set the basic terms of the
federal government’s involvement in education ever since. Rather than >mandating direct federal oversight of schools, ESEA offered states
funding for education programs on a conditional basis. In other words,
states could receive federal funding provided they met the requirements >outlined in certain sections, or titles, of the act. Every major
education initiative since then has been about recalibrating the balance >first struck by ESEA. Until 1980, the program was reauthorized every
three years, each time with more specific guidelines about how federal
funds were to be used.
https://capta.org/role-of-federal-government-in-education/
On 3/27/2024 3:44 PM, Blue Lives Matter wrote:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 15:42:30 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 3/27/2024 3:38 PM, Blue Lives Matter wrote:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 15:31:09 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
{snip}
Again, SCOTUS has said the feds have a very broad power to spend on the >>>>> general welfare, and that almost certainly includes education.
According to you, anyway....
Of course you (and Johnny, Skeeter, Scout and Rudy) disagree with
SCOTUS. But, they have the last say on how to interpret the 10th Amendment.
...and I have the freedom to say they are wrong to allow the Feds to
interfere with education.
How about Social Security? Does that violate the 10th Amendment in your
opinion?
I don't know. I never gave it any thought.
It's an important case to test whether funding education violates the
10th Amendment.
As I understand your argument, federal funding of education is
prohibited by the 10th Amendment because the Constitution does not
explicitly grant the federal government the power to fund education.
If we accept your argument, then it would seem to follow that Social
Security - which is also not explicitly authorized by the Constitution
must also violate the 10th Amendment.
Right?
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 11:39:17 -0700, "max headroom"
<maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote:
In news:uu1c4j$2t8t5$2@dont-email.me, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> >>typed:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:ris70j5f05ip8h4ptc0eru3340if39j5vs@4ax.com:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 02:31:53 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:c4l60jt0tjujc84ib1ghjri5m1610v0lvp@4ax.com:
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 20:33:51 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote in
news:utup64$1srn1$1@dont-email.me:
On 3/26/2024 1:24 AM, Blue Lives Matter wrote:
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 16:42:09 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 3/25/2024 4:33 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
On 3/24/2024 8:17 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
funding schools is authorized by the Taxing Clause in Article >>>>>>>>>>>> I.
I'm sorry to learn you're that retarded.
Me and the Supreme Court.
"The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes,
duties, imposts and excises, to pay the debts and provide for >>>>>>>>>> the common defense and general welfare of the United States."
SCOTUS has long established a broad Congressional power to spend >>>>>>>>>> for
the "general welfare." See United States v. Butler (1936), >>>>>>>>>> Helvering
v. Davis (1937), South Dakota v. Dole (1987).
Nothing about schools..
... or Social Security. But, the Court said in Butler no specific >>>>>>>> mention is required.
Madison's position was specific mentions were required. Hamilton >>>>>>>> said it wasn't. In Butler, the Court accepted Hamilton's view, >>>>>>>> and that remains the law today.
There were a lot of things not dreampt of when the Constitution
was written. Perhaps you'd like to have NO interstate highways? >>>>>>> Or air travel? Or a host of other things we take for granted?
Yeah, but schools existed back when they wrote the Constitution and >>>>>> the founders did not give the Feds power to control them.
At that time, there was a hodge-podge of schools - with only a
fraction of the populace being educated at all. And it became
evident that such a system wasn't working.
At least, in your addled brain....
Read your history.
Have you read the Federalist Papers? Easy reading, right? Just zip right >>through
them....
"The Federalist Papers is a collection of 85 articles and essays written
by
Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay under the collective >>pseudonym
"Publius" to promote the ratification of the Constitution of the United >>States.
The collection was commonly known as The Federalist until the name The >>Federalist Papers emerged in the twentieth century.
"The first seventy-seven of these essays were published serially in the >>Independent Journal, the New York Packet, and The Daily Advertiser between >>October 1787 and April 1788... The last eight papers (Nos. 78-85) were >>republished in the New York newspapers between June 14 and August 16,
1788.
"The authors of The Federalist intended to influence the voters to ratify >>the
Constitution...."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federalist_papers
In other words, they were written for the common man to comprehend and >>contemplate.
Many high school seniors would struggle to make it through one today.
Then the State governments got involved,
AS they should...
Strange - you say State big government should get involved but not
National government!
Which is more responsive to its residents?
and finally the Federal government.
Even though they had no Constitutional power to do so...
So each State should have completely separate educational systems?
And you don't see a problem?
That's a feature, not a bug.
Why? Because it's to everyone's benefit
that all kids receive the same quality/etc of education.
Not exactly, it should be about recieving a high quality education,
not just the same....
What?!! You want 50 different versions of History? 50 different
versions of how to do math? 50 different versions of Grammer?
May the best version win!
And we're still working on that today.
Indeed..
Florida is teaching a different history. And Texas a still different
one too.
Teaching a different history or teaching history differently?
Good golly, miss Molly, teaching a different version of history than
what the federal government wants taught?
Slap your little fingers with a ruler.
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in news:gp190j1k98rf5ttbm7pehv8p072qir1sjb@4ax.com:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 11:39:17 -0700, "max headroom"
<maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote:
In news:uu1c4j$2t8t5$2@dont-email.me, Baxter >>><bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Florida is teaching a different history. And Texas a still
different one too.
Teaching a different history or teaching history differently?
Florida is teaching a different, inaccurate version of history
Good golly, miss Molly, teaching a different version of history thanThe goal is an accurate history - not revisionist propaganda.
what the federal government wants taught?
Slap your little fingers with a ruler.
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 08:03:27 -0400, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message >>news:utlfma$3d8um$1@dont-email.me...
GEO <George@Foo.invalid> wrote in news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public
Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private
schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a dress
and make up.
More conservaturd propaganda.
So, schools are NOT encouraging transgenderism?
Even going to far as to keep parents ignorant of what their child is doing >>in school?
No schools are not encouraging cross dressing.
They just believe in
freedom for the student to express themselves.
Should the school forbid
kids from singing the star spangled banner, if they want to? No, it's a
free country. Only about 0.5% of the population is into cross dressing.
On 2024-03-28 04:22:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu285g$348lv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-27 18:39:17 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu1c4j$2t8t5$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Strange - you say State big government should get involved but not
National government!
Which is more responsive to its residents?
In my state they're more responsive to outside special interest
groups backed by billionaires like the Kochs, like those who
crammed a school voucher with public funding program down their
throats on the threat of throwing a lot of money into campaigns to
primary them.
Wow, public funding-- funds taken from the public
schools
and used to pay for
private
schooling. Is that a problem?
It is to a lot of people, there's only so much money to go around
especially in a state that ranks 45th in education spending.
If you want to send your kids to a private school or homeschool
yourself do it on your own dime.
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:50:19 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>news:nn590jlng5a2mspus759345k0efg68og9i@4ax.com:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 21:32:46 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Start with: https://www.history.com/news/13-colonies-school
I'm not interested in what some guy I never heard of named named Dave
Roos wrote
You got your religion and you're not open to facts.
<LOL> What religion do you imagine me to have?
In news:l6jmq0Fg85hU1@mid.individual.net, Sam <samt@samt.invalid>typed:
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 08:03:27 -0400, "Scout"
<me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:utlfma$3d8um$1@dont-email.me...
GEO <George@Foo.invalid> wrote in news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public
Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private
schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a dress
and make up.
More conservaturd propaganda.
So, schools are NOT encouraging transgenderism?
Even going to far as to keep parents ignorant of what their child is
doing in school?
No schools are not encouraging cross dressing. They just believe in
freedom for the student to express themselves. Should the school
forbid kids from singing the star spangled banner, if they want to?
No, it's a free country. Only about 0.5% of the population is into
cross dressing.
Relax.
He wrote "transgenderism," not "transvestism."
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 16:12:51 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 3/27/2024 3:44 PM, Blue Lives Matter wrote:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 15:42:30 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 3/27/2024 3:38 PM, Blue Lives Matter wrote:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 15:31:09 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
{snip}
Again, SCOTUS has said the feds have a very broad power to spend on the >>>>>> general welfare, and that almost certainly includes education.
According to you, anyway....
Of course you (and Johnny, Skeeter, Scout and Rudy) disagree with
SCOTUS. But, they have the last say on how to interpret the 10th Amendment.
...and I have the freedom to say they are wrong to allow the Feds to >>>>> interfere with education.
How about Social Security? Does that violate the 10th Amendment in your >>>> opinion?
I don't know. I never gave it any thought.
It's an important case to test whether funding education violates the
10th Amendment.
As I understand your argument, federal funding of education is
prohibited by the 10th Amendment because the Constitution does not
explicitly grant the federal government the power to fund education.
If we accept your argument, then it would seem to follow that Social
Security - which is also not explicitly authorized by the Constitution
must also violate the 10th Amendment.
Coiuld be...
Right?
I'm not really interested in that issue.
"max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in news:uu2urh$3crn7$3 @dont-email.me:
In news:l6jmq0Fg85hU1@mid.individual.net, Sam <samt@samt.invalid> typed:
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 08:03:27 -0400, "Scout"
<me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:utlfma$3d8um$1@dont-email.me...
GEO <George@Foo.invalid> wrote in
news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public
Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private
schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they
teach is that if you are male you are female and you need to
wear a dress and make up.
More conservaturd propaganda.
So, schools are NOT encouraging transgenderism?
Even going to far as to keep parents ignorant of what their child
is doing in school?
No schools are not encouraging cross dressing. They just believe in
freedom for the student to express themselves. Should the school
forbid kids from singing the star spangled banner, if they want to?
No, it's a free country. Only about 0.5% of the population is into
cross dressing.
Relax.
He wrote "transgenderism," not "transvestism."
So? No schools are encouraging transgenderism either. That's a
medical issue with the kid and their parents.
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >news:q36a0jt85thsahmftu9q1jc76s7omjtpjt@4ax.com:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:50:19 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>news:nn590jlng5a2mspus759345k0efg68og9i@4ax.com:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 21:32:46 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Start with: https://www.history.com/news/13-colonies-school
I'm not interested in what some guy I never heard of named named Dave
Roos wrote
You got your religion and you're not open to facts.
<LOL> What religion do you imagine me to have?
MAGA
On 3/28/2024 12:22 AM, Blue Lives Matter wrote:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 16:12:51 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 3/27/2024 3:44 PM, Blue Lives Matter wrote:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 15:42:30 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 3/27/2024 3:38 PM, Blue Lives Matter wrote:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 15:31:09 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
{snip}
Again, SCOTUS has said the feds have a very broad power to spend on the >>>>>>> general welfare, and that almost certainly includes education.
According to you, anyway....
Of course you (and Johnny, Skeeter, Scout and Rudy) disagree with >>>>>>> SCOTUS. But, they have the last say on how to interpret the 10th Amendment.
...and I have the freedom to say they are wrong to allow the Feds to >>>>>> interfere with education.
How about Social Security? Does that violate the 10th Amendment in your >>>>> opinion?
I don't know. I never gave it any thought.
It's an important case to test whether funding education violates the
10th Amendment.
As I understand your argument, federal funding of education is
prohibited by the 10th Amendment because the Constitution does not
explicitly grant the federal government the power to fund education.
If we accept your argument, then it would seem to follow that Social
Security - which is also not explicitly authorized by the Constitution
must also violate the 10th Amendment.
Coiuld be...
Right?
I'm not really interested in that issue.
That is, "I'm not really interested in the logical consequences of my >arguments. I'm a troll."
In news:uu30t4$3d7la$1@dont-email.me, super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-28 04:22:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu285g$348lv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-27 18:39:17 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu1c4j$2t8t5$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Strange - you say State big government should get involved but not >>>>>> National government!
Which is more responsive to its residents?
In my state they're more responsive to outside special interest
groups backed by billionaires like the Kochs, like those who
crammed a school voucher with public funding program down their
throats on the threat of throwing a lot of money into campaigns to
primary them.
Wow, public funding-- funds taken from the public
schools
Public schools don't generate funds, they consume funds... which come from taxpayers.
and used to pay for
private
schooling. Is that a problem?
It is to a lot of people, there's only so much money to go around
especially in a state that ranks 45th in education spending.
Shouldn't they be spending those precious taxpayer moneys in the best
manner
possible?
If you want to send your kids to a private school or homeschool
yourself do it on your own dime.
How about the government letting me keep the portion of my taxes that are spent
on government schools so I can fund a better choice?
Aren't you pro-choice?
Don't you want your kids to have the best education available?
"max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in news:uu2urh$3crn7$3 @dont-email.me:
In news:l6jmq0Fg85hU1@mid.individual.net, Sam <samt@samt.invalid>typed:
So? No schools are encouraging transgenderism either. That's a medical issue with the kid and their parents.
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 08:03:27 -0400, "Scout"
<me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:utlfma$3d8um$1@dont-email.me...
GEO <George@Foo.invalid> wrote in news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me: >>>>>> On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public
Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private
schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they teach >>>>>> is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a dress >>>>>> and make up.
More conservaturd propaganda.
So, schools are NOT encouraging transgenderism?
Even going to far as to keep parents ignorant of what their child is
doing in school?
No schools are not encouraging cross dressing. They just believe in
freedom for the student to express themselves. Should the school
forbid kids from singing the star spangled banner, if they want to?
No, it's a free country. Only about 0.5% of the population is into
cross dressing.
Relax.
He wrote "transgenderism," not "transvestism."
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in news:q36a0jt85thsahmftu9q1jc76s7omjtpjt@4ax.com:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:50:19 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>news:nn590jlng5a2mspus759345k0efg68og9i@4ax.com:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 21:32:46 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Start with: https://www.history.com/news/13-colonies-school
I'm not interested in what some guy I never heard of named named Dave
Roos wrote
You got your religion and you're not open to facts.
<LOL> What religion do you imagine me to have?
MAGA
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 14:50:59 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>news:q36a0jt85thsahmftu9q1jc76s7omjtpjt@4ax.com:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:50:19 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>news:nn590jlng5a2mspus759345k0efg68og9i@4ax.com:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 21:32:46 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Start with: https://www.history.com/news/13-colonies-school
I'm not interested in what some guy I never heard of named named Dave >>>>> Roos wrote
You got your religion and you're not open to facts.
<LOL> What religion do you imagine me to have?
MAGA
Do you not want to make America great again?
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message news:uu4030$3kps7$2@dont-email.me...
On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried — and *failed* — to bullshit:
In news:l6jmq0Fg85hU1@mid.individual.net, Sam <samt@samt.invalid>typed:
So? No schools are encouraging transgenderism either. That's a medical >> issue with the kid and their parents.
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 08:03:27 -0400, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper, lied:
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:utlfma$3d8um$1@dont-email.me...
GEO <George@Foo.invalid> wrote in news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me: >>>>>>> On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public >>>>>>>> Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private >>>>>>>> schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they teach >>>>>>> is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a dress >>>>>>> and make up.
More conservaturd propaganda.
So, schools are NOT encouraging transgenderism?
Even going to far as to keep parents ignorant of what their child is >>>>> doing in school?
No schools are not encouraging cross dressing. They just believe in
freedom for the student to express themselves. Should the school
forbid kids from singing the star spangled banner, if they want to?
No, it's a free country. Only about 0.5% of the population is into
cross dressing.
Relax.
He wrote "transgenderism," not "transvestism."
Cites [sic] already provided show otherwise.
On 3/28/2024 9:57 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper, lied:
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message news:uu4030$3kps7$2@dont-email.me...
On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried ? and *failed* ? to bullshit:
In news:l6jmq0Fg85hU1@mid.individual.net, Sam <samt@samt.invalid>typed:
So? No schools are encouraging transgenderism either. That's a medical >> issue with the kid and their parents.
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 08:03:27 -0400, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper, lied:
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:utlfma$3d8um$1@dont-email.me...
GEO <George@Foo.invalid> wrote in news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me: >>>>>>> On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public >>>>>>>> Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private >>>>>>>> schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they teach >>>>>>> is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a dress >>>>>>> and make up.
More conservaturd propaganda.
So, schools are NOT encouraging transgenderism?
Even going to far as to keep parents ignorant of what their child is >>>>> doing in school?
No schools are not encouraging cross dressing. They just believe in
freedom for the student to express themselves. Should the school
forbid kids from singing the star spangled banner, if they want to?
No, it's a free country. Only about 0.5% of the population is into
cross dressing.
Relax.
He wrote "transgenderism," not "transvestism."
Cites [sic] already provided show otherwise.
No, they don't, scooter. Neither you nor any of your knuckle-dragging fellow right-wingnuts have produced any citations (not "cites") showing any schools "encouraging" transgenderism. You lied, as usual.
On 3/27/2024 3:44 PM, Blue Lives Matter wrote:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 15:42:30 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 3/27/2024 3:38 PM, Blue Lives Matter wrote:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 15:31:09 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
{snip}
Again, SCOTUS has said the feds have a very broad power to spend on the >>>>> general welfare, and that almost certainly includes education.
According to you, anyway....
Of course you (and Johnny, Skeeter, Scout and Rudy) disagree with
SCOTUS. But, they have the last say on how to interpret the 10th Amendment.
...and I have the freedom to say they are wrong to allow the Feds to
interfere with education.
How about Social Security? Does that violate the 10th Amendment in your
opinion?
I don't know. I never gave it any thought.
It's an important case to test whether funding education violates the
10th Amendment.
As I understand your argument, federal funding of education is
prohibited by the 10th Amendment because the Constitution does not
explicitly grant the federal government the power to fund education.
If we accept your argument, then it would seem to follow that Social
Security - which is also not explicitly authorized by the Constitution
must also violate the 10th Amendment.
Right?
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 16:12:51 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 3/27/2024 3:44 PM, Blue Lives Matter wrote:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 15:42:30 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 3/27/2024 3:38 PM, Blue Lives Matter wrote:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 15:31:09 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
{snip}
Again, SCOTUS has said the feds have a very broad power to spend on the >>>>>> general welfare, and that almost certainly includes education.
According to you, anyway....
Of course you (and Johnny, Skeeter, Scout and Rudy) disagree with
SCOTUS. But, they have the last say on how to interpret the 10th Amendment.
...and I have the freedom to say they are wrong to allow the Feds to >>>>> interfere with education.
How about Social Security? Does that violate the 10th Amendment in your >>>> opinion?
I don't know. I never gave it any thought.
It's an important case to test whether funding education violates the
10th Amendment.
As I understand your argument, federal funding of education is
prohibited by the 10th Amendment because the Constitution does not
explicitly grant the federal government the power to fund education.
If we accept your argument, then it would seem to follow that Social
Security - which is also not explicitly authorized by the Constitution
must also violate the 10th Amendment.
Right?
Social Security and Medicare are funded by federal income taxes. That
makes them legal. Don't worry, when they were created people challenged
under the constitution and the Supreme Court said nonsense because of the 16th Amendment that allows income taxes.
In news:uu30t4$3d7la$1@dont-email.me, super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-28 04:22:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu285g$348lv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-27 18:39:17 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu1c4j$2t8t5$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Strange - you say State big government should get involved but not >>>>>> National government!
Which is more responsive to its residents?
In my state they're more responsive to outside special interest
groups backed by billionaires like the Kochs, like those who
crammed a school voucher with public funding program down their
throats on the threat of throwing a lot of money into campaigns to
primary them.
Wow, public funding-- funds taken from the public
schools
Public schools don't generate funds, they consume funds... which come from taxpayers.
and used to pay for
private
schooling. Is that a problem?
It is to a lot of people, there's only so much money to go around
especially in a state that ranks 45th in education spending.
Shouldn't they be spending those precious taxpayer moneys in the best manner possible?
If you want to send your kids to a private school or homeschool
yourself do it on your own dime.
How about the government letting me keep the portion of my taxes that are spent
on government schools so I can fund a better choice?
Aren't you pro-choice?
Don't you want your kids to have the best education available?
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 14:50:59 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:Dave
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>news:q36a0jt85thsahmftu9q1jc76s7omjtpjt@4ax.com:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:50:19 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>news:nn590jlng5a2mspus759345k0efg68og9i@4ax.com:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 21:32:46 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Start with: https://www.history.com/news/13-colonies-school
I'm not interested in what some guy I never heard of named named
Roos wrote
You got your religion and you're not open to facts.
<LOL> What religion do you imagine me to have?
MAGA
Do you not want to make America great again?
In news:uu4030$3kps7$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
"max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in news:uu2urh$3crn7$3
@dont-email.me:
In news:l6jmq0Fg85hU1@mid.individual.net, Sam <samt@samt.invalid>
typed:
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 08:03:27 -0400, "Scout"
<me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:utlfma$3d8um$1@dont-email.me...
GEO <George@Foo.invalid> wrote in
news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public >>>>>>>> Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private >>>>>>>> schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they
teach is that if you are male you are female and you need to
wear a dress and make up.
More conservaturd propaganda.
So, schools are NOT encouraging transgenderism?
Even going to far as to keep parents ignorant of what their child
is doing in school?
No schools are not encouraging cross dressing. They just believe in
freedom for the student to express themselves. Should the school
forbid kids from singing the star spangled banner, if they want to?
No, it's a free country. Only about 0.5% of the population is into
cross dressing.
Relax.
He wrote "transgenderism," not "transvestism."
So? No schools are encouraging transgenderism either. That's a
medical issue with the kid and their parents.
So why are teachers encouraged to hide it from the parents?
On 3/26/2024 7:45 AM, Mike Colangelo wrote:
On 3/25/2024 4:52 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/25/2024 4:45 PM, Mike Colangelo wrote:
On 3/24/2024 7:17 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/24/2024 7:08 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 07:08:42 -0400, Blue Lives Matter
<Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:02:54 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote in
news:VuGLN.723169$p%Mb.330709@fx15.iad:
On 3/23/2024 7:48 AM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <utlg6s$3d8um$3@dont-email.me>,We should take the federal government out of schools. According to >>>>>>>>> the Constitution it doesn't belong there.
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
lloyd <lloyd@demon.net> wrote in
news:utl8jt$3avdt$2@news.mixmin.net:
On 22 Mar 2024, GEO <George@Foo.invalid> posted some
news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private >>>>>>>>>>>>>> schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a >>>>>>>>>>>>> dress and make up.
Ain't that the truth? Especially in Oregon.
School vouchers be like:
'I don't like the public parks, so I want my kid to go to the >>>>>>>>>>> Country Club to play - and I want the Public Parks to pay for it.' >>>>>>>>>>> 'oh! and I want my property taxes reduced by not paying for those >>>>>>>>>>> public parks.'
Who said that? Why did they take trade classes out of the schools? >>>>>>>>>>
Where in the Constitution does it say anything about schools?
Nowhere, Dummy, that's the point
Then there's no reason for the Federal government to not participate in >>>>>> schools since isn't forbidden.
That's not the way federalism works. Congressional legislation must be >>>>> authorized by a power delineated in Article I (as well as not prohibited by
something like the First Amendment).
In this case, funding schools is authorized by the Taxing Clause in Article I.
Funding schools is not anything for the general welfare.
 From South Dakota v. Dole (1987):
"In considering whether a particular expenditure is intended to serve general
public purposes, courts should defer substantially to the judgment of
Congress. Helvering v. Davis, supra, at 301 U. S. 640, 301 U. S. 645.
{Footnote 2}: The level of deference to the congressional decision is such >>> that the Court has more recently questioned whether "general welfare" is a >>> judicially enforceable restriction at all.
So let's just pretend it's not in the Constitution at all.
Leaving the footnote aside, The Court argues it is following the Constitution.
But Congress makes the determination of whether funding serves general public purposes, except when it is irrational to believe it is.
On 3/26/2024 8:21 AM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
In this case, funding schools is authorized by the Taxing Clause
in Article I.
Funding schools is not anything for the general welfare.
 From South Dakota v. Dole (1987):
"In considering whether a particular expenditure is intended to
serve general public purposes, courts should defer substantially to
the judgment of Congress. Helvering v. Davis, supra, at 301 U. S.
640, 301 U. S. 645. {Footnote 2}: The level of deference to the
congressional decision is such that the Court has more recently
questioned whether "general welfare" is a judicially enforceable
restriction at all.
So let's just pretend it's not in the Constitution at all.
Leaving the footnote aside, The Court argues it is following the
Constitution. But Congress makes the determination of whether funding
serves general public purposes, except when it is irrational to
believe it is.
Who says they do?
Based on what definition of general welfare?
Face the facts: you're an extremist proggie who believes the federal government should be able to do whatever it wants to do,
On 3/28/2024 8:51 PM, Lou Bricano wrote:
On 3/26/2024 8:21 AM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
{snip}
In this case, funding schools is authorized by the Taxing Clause in >>>>>>> Article I.
Funding schools is not anything for the general welfare.
 From South Dakota v. Dole (1987):
"In considering whether a particular expenditure is intended to serve >>>>> general public purposes, courts should defer substantially to the judgment
of Congress. Helvering v. Davis, supra, at 301 U. S. 640, 301 U. S. 645. >>>>> {Footnote 2}: The level of deference to the congressional decision is such
that the Court has more recently questioned whether "general welfare" is a
judicially enforceable restriction at all.
So let's just pretend it's not in the Constitution at all.
Leaving the footnote aside, The Court argues it is following the
Constitution. But Congress makes the determination of whether funding serves
general public purposes, except when it is irrational to believe it is.
Who says they do?
SCOTUS
Based on what definition of general welfare?
Anything that has a rational basis for for helping the people as a whole.
Face the facts: you're an extremist proggie who believes the federal
government should be able to do whatever it wants to do,
I am just stating what the law is.
You just couldn't resist trolling
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >news:fk4b0jd0r0b664g9nahhsi60joolqqhfml@4ax.com:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 14:50:59 -0000 (UTC), BaxterDave
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>news:q36a0jt85thsahmftu9q1jc76s7omjtpjt@4ax.com:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:50:19 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>news:nn590jlng5a2mspus759345k0efg68og9i@4ax.com:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 21:32:46 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Start with: https://www.history.com/news/13-colonies-school
I'm not interested in what some guy I never heard of named named
Roos wrote
You got your religion and you're not open to facts.
<LOL> What religion do you imagine me to have?
MAGA
Do you not want to make America great again?
MAGA is a religion - and your idea of "great" was left in the trashcan of >history long ago.
On 2024-03-28 14:21:31 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu30t4$3d7la$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid>
typed:
On 2024-03-28 04:22:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu285g$348lv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-27 18:39:17 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu1c4j$2t8t5$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Strange - you say State big government should get involved but not >>>>>>> National government!
Which is more responsive to its residents?
In my state they're more responsive to outside special interest
groups backed by billionaires like the Kochs, like those who
crammed a school voucher with public funding program down their
throats on the threat of throwing a lot of money into campaigns to
primary them.
Wow, public funding-- funds taken from the public
schools
Public schools don't generate funds, they consume funds... which come
from
taxpayers.
and used to pay for
private
schooling. Is that a problem?
It is to a lot of people, there's only so much money to go around
especially in a state that ranks 45th in education spending.
Shouldn't they be spending those precious taxpayer moneys in the best
manner
possible?
Sure rob poor Peter to pay rich Paul, the Republican credo. Most of those parents with kids in private schools are already well off.
"max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in news:uu42lb$3lj46$2@dont-email.me:
In news:uu4030$3kps7$2@dont-email.me, BaxterIt's the kids that are hiding, because the parents (like you) are
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
"max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in news:uu2urh$3crn7$3
@dont-email.me:
In news:l6jmq0Fg85hU1@mid.individual.net, Sam <samt@samt.invalid>
typed:
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 08:03:27 -0400, "Scout"
<me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:utlfma$3d8um$1@dont-email.me...
GEO <George@Foo.invalid> wrote in
news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public >>>>>>>>> Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private >>>>>>>>> schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they
teach is that if you are male you are female and you need to
wear a dress and make up.
More conservaturd propaganda.
So, schools are NOT encouraging transgenderism?
Even going to far as to keep parents ignorant of what their child
is doing in school?
No schools are not encouraging cross dressing. They just believe in
freedom for the student to express themselves. Should the school
forbid kids from singing the star spangled banner, if they want to?
No, it's a free country. Only about 0.5% of the population is into
cross dressing.
Relax.
He wrote "transgenderism," not "transvestism."
So? No schools are encouraging transgenderism either. That's a
medical issue with the kid and their parents.
So why are teachers encouraged to hide it from the parents?
abusive.
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in news:fk4b0jd0r0b664g9nahhsi60joolqqhfml@4ax.com:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 14:50:59 -0000 (UTC), BaxterDave
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>news:q36a0jt85thsahmftu9q1jc76s7omjtpjt@4ax.com:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:50:19 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>news:nn590jlng5a2mspus759345k0efg68og9i@4ax.com:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 21:32:46 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Start with: https://www.history.com/news/13-colonies-school
I'm not interested in what some guy I never heard of named named
Roos wrote
You got your religion and you're not open to facts.
<LOL> What religion do you imagine me to have?
MAGA
Do you not want to make America great again?
MAGA is a religion
On 3/28/2024 9:55 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/28/2024 8:51 PM, Lou Bricano wrote:
On 3/26/2024 8:21 AM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
{snip}
In this case, funding schools is authorized by the Taxing Clause >>>>>>>> in Article I.
Funding schools is not anything for the general welfare.
 From South Dakota v. Dole (1987):
"In considering whether a particular expenditure is intended to
serve general public purposes, courts should defer substantially
to the judgment of Congress. Helvering v. Davis, supra, at 301 U.
S. 640, 301 U. S. 645. {Footnote 2}: The level of deference to the >>>>>> congressional decision is such that the Court has more recently
questioned whether "general welfare" is a judicially enforceable
restriction at all.
So let's just pretend it's not in the Constitution at all.
Leaving the footnote aside, The Court argues it is following the
Constitution. But Congress makes the determination of whether
funding serves general public purposes, except when it is irrational
to believe it is.
Who says they do?
SCOTUS
No.
Based on what definition of general welfare?
Anything that has a rational basis for for helping the people as a whole.
Who gets to decide that, and on what authority?
Face the facts: you're an extremist proggie who believes the federal
government should be able to do whatever it wants to do,
I am just stating what the law is.
You're stating what you think the law ought to be, based on your proggie orientation that says you and your fellow proggies, claiming to have
superior vision, should be able to do whatever you want, Constitution be damned.
You just couldn't resist trolling
Not trolling, you slimy Jew sophist. I'm stating the facts. "Good law"
to you is court decisions that allow you and your like-minded proggie statists to get what you want. That's all it means.
On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 02:53:06 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>news:fk4b0jd0r0b664g9nahhsi60joolqqhfml@4ax.com:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 14:50:59 -0000 (UTC), BaxterDave
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>news:q36a0jt85thsahmftu9q1jc76s7omjtpjt@4ax.com:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:50:19 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>news:nn590jlng5a2mspus759345k0efg68og9i@4ax.com:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 21:32:46 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Start with: https://www.history.com/news/13-colonies-school
I'm not interested in what some guy I never heard of named named
Roos wrote
You got your religion and you're not open to facts.
<LOL> What religion do you imagine me to have?
MAGA
Do you not want to make America great again?
MAGA is a religion - and your idea of "great" was left in the trashcan
of history long ago.
You have a right to have that opinion, yet the polling shows that you
are in the minority... where you belong.
On 3/28/2024 10:20 PM, Lou Bricano wrote:
On 3/28/2024 9:55 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/28/2024 8:51 PM, Lou Bricano wrote:
On 3/26/2024 8:21 AM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
{snip}
So let's just pretend it's not in the Constitution at all.In this case, funding schools is authorized by the Taxing Clause in >>>>>>>>> Article I.
Funding schools is not anything for the general welfare.
 From South Dakota v. Dole (1987):
"In considering whether a particular expenditure is intended to serve >>>>>>> general public purposes, courts should defer substantially to the >>>>>>> judgment of Congress. Helvering v. Davis, supra, at 301 U. S. 640, 301 U.
S. 645. {Footnote 2}: The level of deference to the congressional >>>>>>> decision is such that the Court has more recently questioned whether >>>>>>> "general welfare" is a judicially enforceable restriction at all. >>>>>>
Leaving the footnote aside, The Court argues it is following the
Constitution. But Congress makes the determination of whether funding >>>>> serves general public purposes, except when it is irrational to believe it is.
Who says they do?
SCOTUS
No.
Who gets to decide that, and on what authority?Based on what definition of general welfare?
Anything that has a rational basis for for helping the people as a whole. >>
The courts under Article III.
Face the facts: you're an extremist proggie who believes the federal
government should be able to do whatever it wants to do,
I am just stating what the law is.
You're stating what you think the law ought to be, based on your proggie
orientation that says you and your fellow proggies, claiming to have superior
vision, should be able to do whatever you want, Constitution be damned.
You just couldn't resist trolling
Not trolling, you slimy Jew sophist. I'm stating the facts. "Good law" to you
is court decisions that allow you and your like-minded proggie statists to get
what you want. That's all it means.
No. Good law is a description of what SCOTUS has held to be binding precedent.
No. Good law is a description of what SCOTUS has held to be binding precedent. I thought Citizens United was wrongly decided, but it is
good law that limitations on independent expenditures in campaigns are unconstitutional (no matter what I think ought to be the case).
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message news:uu5abj$2csc$1@dont-email.me...$3
"max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in
news:uu42lb$3lj46$2@dont-email.me:
In news:uu4030$3kps7$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
"max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in news:uu2urh$3crn7
in@dont-email.me:
In news:l6jmq0Fg85hU1@mid.individual.net, Sam <samt@samt.invalid>
typed:
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 08:03:27 -0400, "Scout"
<me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:utlfma$3d8um$1@dont-email.me...
GEO <George@Foo.invalid> wrote in
news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public >>>>>>>>>> Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private >>>>>>>>>> schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they >>>>>>>>> teach is that if you are male you are female and you need to >>>>>>>>> wear a dress and make up.
More conservaturd propaganda.
So, schools are NOT encouraging transgenderism?
Even going to far as to keep parents ignorant of what their child >>>>>>> is doing in school?
No schools are not encouraging cross dressing. They just believe
to?freedom for the student to express themselves. Should the school
forbid kids from singing the star spangled banner, if they want
It's the kids that are hiding, because the parents (like you) areNo, it's a free country. Only about 0.5% of the population is into >>>>>> cross dressing.
Relax.
He wrote "transgenderism," not "transvestism."
So? No schools are encouraging transgenderism either. That's a
medical issue with the kid and their parents.
So why are teachers encouraged to hide it from the parents?
abusive.
Assumes facts not in evidence,
and doesn't explain teacher promoting and
encouraging transgenderism behavior.
Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote in news:uu6jou$be9k$1@dont-email.me:
No. Good law is a description of what SCOTUS has held to be bindingCitizens United is bad law - just like Dred Scott was bad law.
precedent. I thought Citizens United was wrongly decided, but it is
good law that limitations on independent expenditures in campaigns are
unconstitutional (no matter what I think ought to be the case).
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >news:istc0jlkbs3u42fk62orvf0hl9ckeiqt9s@4ax.com:
On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 02:53:06 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>news:fk4b0jd0r0b664g9nahhsi60joolqqhfml@4ax.com:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 14:50:59 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>news:q36a0jt85thsahmftu9q1jc76s7omjtpjt@4ax.com:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:50:19 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>>news:nn590jlng5a2mspus759345k0efg68og9i@4ax.com:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 21:32:46 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Start with: https://www.history.com/news/13-colonies-school
I'm not interested in what some guy I never heard of named named >>>Dave
Roos wrote
You got your religion and you're not open to facts.
<LOL> What religion do you imagine me to have?
MAGA
Do you not want to make America great again?
MAGA is a religion - and your idea of "great" was left in the trashcan
of history long ago.
You have a right to have that opinion, yet the polling shows that you
are in the minority... where you belong.
MAGA is in the minority - yet believe themselves to be even more than the >majority.
On 3/29/2024 7:38 AM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/28/2024 10:20 PM, Lou Bricano wrote:
Who gets to decide that, and on what authority?
The courts under Article III.
What specifically in Article III says the courts get to decide the
definition of general welfare?
No. Good law is a description of what SCOTUS has held to be binding
precedent.
No. "Good law" to you is law that gives proggies what they want.
On 3/29/2024 7:55 AM, Lou Bricano wrote:
On 3/29/2024 7:38 AM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/28/2024 10:20 PM, Lou Bricano wrote:
{snip}
Who gets to decide that, and on what authority?
The courts under Article III.
What specifically in Article III says the courts get to decide the definition
of general welfare?
"The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under
this Constitution."
Helvering (to name one example) presented a case of whether Social Security was
constitutional. Under Article III, the courts had jurisdiction to make that determination which required them to decide what spending on the "general welfare" means.
No. Good law is a description of what SCOTUS has held to be binding precedent.
No. "Good law" to you is law that gives proggies what they want.
FFS, you troll. Citizens United - not what I want, but good law.
"max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in news:uu42lb$3lj46$2@dont-email.me:
In news:uu4030$3kps7$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
"max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in news:uu2urh$3crn7$3
@dont-email.me:
In news:l6jmq0Fg85hU1@mid.individual.net, Sam <samt@samt.invalid>
typed:
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 08:03:27 -0400, "Scout"
<me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:utlfma$3d8um$1@dont-email.me...
GEO <George@Foo.invalid> wrote in
news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public >>>>>>>> Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private >>>>>>>> schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they
teach is that if you are male you are female and you need to
wear a dress and make up.
More conservaturd propaganda.
So, schools are NOT encouraging transgenderism?
Even going to far as to keep parents ignorant of what their child
is doing in school?
No schools are not encouraging cross dressing. They just believe in
freedom for the student to express themselves. Should the school
forbid kids from singing the star spangled banner, if they want to?
No, it's a free country. Only about 0.5% of the population is into
cross dressing.
Relax.
He wrote "transgenderism," not "transvestism."
So? No schools are encouraging transgenderism either. That's a
medical issue with the kid and their parents.
So why are teachers encouraged to hide it from the parents?
It's the kids that are hiding, because the parents (like you) are
abusive.
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in news:fk4b0jd0r0b664g9nahhsi60joolqqhfml@4ax.com:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 14:50:59 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
DaveBlue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>news:q36a0jt85thsahmftu9q1jc76s7omjtpjt@4ax.com:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:50:19 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>news:nn590jlng5a2mspus759345k0efg68og9i@4ax.com:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 21:32:46 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Start with: https://www.history.com/news/13-colonies-school
I'm not interested in what some guy I never heard of named named
Roos wrote
You got your religion and you're not open to facts.
<LOL> What religion do you imagine me to have?
MAGA
Do you not want to make America great again?
MAGA is a religion - and your idea of "great" was left in the trashcan of history long ago.
On 3/28/2024 9:55 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/28/2024 8:51 PM, Lou Bricano wrote:
On 3/26/2024 8:21 AM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
{snip}
Who says they do?In this case, funding schools is authorized by the Taxing Clause in >>>>>>> Article I.
Funding schools is not anything for the general welfare.
From South Dakota v. Dole (1987):
"In considering whether a particular expenditure is intended to serve >>>>> general public purposes, courts should defer substantially to the judgment
of Congress. Helvering v. Davis, supra, at 301 U. S. 640, 301 U. S. 645.
{Footnote 2}: The level of deference to the congressional decision is such
that the Court has more recently questioned whether "general welfare" is a
judicially enforceable restriction at all.
So let's just pretend it's not in the Constitution at all.
Leaving the footnote aside, The Court argues it is following the
Constitution. But Congress makes the determination of whether funding serves
general public purposes, except when it is irrational to believe it is. >>
SCOTUS
No.
Based on what definition of general welfare?
Anything that has a rational basis for for helping the people as a whole.
Who gets to decide that, and on what authority?
You will now beg the question again.
Face the facts: you're an extremist proggie who believes the federal
government should be able to do whatever it wants to do,
I am just stating what the law is.
You're stating what you think the law ought to be, based on your proggie orientation that says you and your fellow proggies, claiming to have superior vision, should be able to do whatever you want, Constitution be damned.
You just couldn't resist trolling
Not trolling, you slimy Jew sophist. I'm stating the facts. "Good law" to you is
court decisions that allow you and your like-minded proggie statists to get what
you want. That's all it means.
Constitutionally ungrounded decisions like Roe are "good" in your view. Equally
constitutionally ungrounded decisions like Dobbs are "bad." In both cases, the
judgment has only to do with whether they help or hurt your side. That's all it is.
You're a proggie. You despise the idea of constitutional limitations on the power if they get in the way ? as they always do ? of you and your fellow proggie statists telling the rest of us what to do. You think you have an unchallengeable superior vision of what society should be like and how it should
operate, and you hate the idea that a constitution might prevent you from implementing your agenda. Well, fuck you. That's exactly what a constitution is
supposed to do. Your vision is not objectively superior to that of others, and
you have to play by the rules.
You are not what you pretend to be.
On 3/26/2024 8:21 AM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/26/2024 7:45 AM, Mike Colangelo wrote:
On 3/25/2024 4:52 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/25/2024 4:45 PM, Mike Colangelo wrote:
On 3/24/2024 7:17 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/24/2024 7:08 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 07:08:42 -0400, Blue Lives Matter
<Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:02:54 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote inNowhere, Dummy, that's the point
news:VuGLN.723169$p%Mb.330709@fx15.iad:
On 3/23/2024 7:48 AM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <utlg6s$3d8um$3@dont-email.me>,We should take the federal government out of schools. According to >>>>>>>>> the Constitution it doesn't belong there.
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
lloyd <lloyd@demon.net> wrote in
news:utl8jt$3avdt$2@news.mixmin.net:
On 22 Mar 2024, GEO <George@Foo.invalid> posted some >>>>>>>>>>>> news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private >>>>>>>>>>>>>> schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they teach
is that if you are male you are female and you need to wear a >>>>>>>>>>>>> dress and make up.
Ain't that the truth? Especially in Oregon.
School vouchers be like:
'I don't like the public parks, so I want my kid to go to the >>>>>>>>>>> Country Club to play - and I want the Public Parks to pay for it.'
'oh! and I want my property taxes reduced by not paying for those >>>>>>>>>>> public parks.'
Who said that? Why did they take trade classes out of the schools? >>>>>>>>>>
Where in the Constitution does it say anything about schools? >>>>>>>
Then there's no reason for the Federal government to not participate in
schools since isn't forbidden.
That's not the way federalism works. Congressional legislation must be >>>>> authorized by a power delineated in Article I (as well as not prohibited by
something like the First Amendment).
In this case, funding schools is authorized by the Taxing Clause in Article I.
Funding schools is not anything for the general welfare.
From South Dakota v. Dole (1987):
"In considering whether a particular expenditure is intended to serve general
public purposes, courts should defer substantially to the judgment of
Congress. Helvering v. Davis, supra, at 301 U. S. 640, 301 U. S. 645.
{Footnote 2}: The level of deference to the congressional decision is such
that the Court has more recently questioned whether "general welfare" is a
judicially enforceable restriction at all.
So let's just pretend it's not in the Constitution at all.
Leaving the footnote aside, The Court argues it is following the Constitution.
But Congress makes the determination of whether funding serves general public
purposes, except when it is irrational to believe it is.
Who says they do? Based on what definition of general welfare?
Face the facts: you're an extremist proggie who believes the federal government
should be able to do whatever it wants to do, as long as it coincides with what
you want done. Like father, like son. You despise the very notion that the Constitution should limit what proggies can do when they control the levers of
power. All proggies have always felt this way. You claim to have superior vision
of what is good ? the "Vision of the Anointed," Sowell called it ? and you hate
the idea that a constitution might thwart you from implementing the policies that you feel, without any need to prove, would lead to "progress." Your father
felt the same way. The Constitution is an impediment to achieving what you "know," with your unwarranted and arrogant moral certitude, "ought" to be done.
So any court decision that upholds what you want to be done is "good law," while
one that doesn't is specious.
You're a sophist. You're not just a sophist, but you're a proggie anti-constitutional sophist. You fundamentally don't believe in constitutional
limitations on you proggies achieving what you want to do. You are fundamentally
no different from a Trumpswab.
On 3/29/2024 8:48 AM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/29/2024 7:55 AM, Lou Bricano wrote:
On 3/29/2024 7:38 AM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/28/2024 10:20 PM, Lou Bricano wrote:
{snip}
Who gets to decide that, and on what authority?
The courts under Article III.
What specifically in Article III says the courts get to decide the definition
of general welfare?
"The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under
this Constitution."
That does not give the courts power to *define* general welfare.
Helvering (to name one example) presented a case of whether Social Security was
constitutional. Under Article III, the courts had jurisdiction to make that determination which required them to decide what spending on the "general welfare" means.
The court doesn't get to create definitions of constitutional terms.
No. Good law is a description of what SCOTUS has held to be binding precedent.
No. "Good law" to you is law that gives proggies what they want.
FFS, you troll. Citizens United - not what I want, but good law.
You have fabricated your definition of "good law." You're equivocating on the meaning of "good."
In any case, as a proggie sophist in good standing, you want any interpretation
of "general welfare" that lets you get around any constitutional limitation on
government power. You want to escape any constitutional limitations altogether.
On 3/29/2024 7:38 AM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/28/2024 10:20 PM, Lou Bricano wrote:
On 3/28/2024 9:55 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/28/2024 8:51 PM, Lou Bricano wrote:
On 3/26/2024 8:21 AM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
{snip}
So let's just pretend it's not in the Constitution at all.In this case, funding schools is authorized by the Taxing Clause in >>>>>>>>> Article I.
Funding schools is not anything for the general welfare.
From South Dakota v. Dole (1987):
"In considering whether a particular expenditure is intended to serve >>>>>>> general public purposes, courts should defer substantially to the >>>>>>> judgment of Congress. Helvering v. Davis, supra, at 301 U. S. 640, 301 U.
S. 645. {Footnote 2}: The level of deference to the congressional >>>>>>> decision is such that the Court has more recently questioned whether >>>>>>> "general welfare" is a judicially enforceable restriction at all. >>>>>>
Leaving the footnote aside, The Court argues it is following the
Constitution. But Congress makes the determination of whether funding >>>>> serves general public purposes, except when it is irrational to believe it is.
Who says they do?
SCOTUS
No.
Who gets to decide that, and on what authority?Based on what definition of general welfare?
Anything that has a rational basis for for helping the people as a whole. >>
The courts under Article III.
What specifically in Article III says the courts get to decide the definition of
general welfare?
You know you're beaten. Being a proggie sophist, you just won't stop.
Face the facts: you're an extremist proggie who believes the federal >>>> government should be able to do whatever it wants to do,
I am just stating what the law is.
You're stating what you think the law ought to be, based on your proggie >> orientation that says you and your fellow proggies, claiming to have superior
vision, should be able to do whatever you want, Constitution be damned. >>>
You just couldn't resist trolling
Not trolling, you slimy Jew sophist. I'm stating the facts. "Good law" to you
is court decisions that allow you and your like-minded proggie statists to get
what you want. That's all it means.
No. Good law is a description of what SCOTUS has held to be binding precedent.
No. "Good law" to you is law that gives proggies what they want.
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in news:istc0jlkbs3u42fk62orvf0hl9ckeiqt9s@4ax.com:
On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 02:53:06 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>news:fk4b0jd0r0b664g9nahhsi60joolqqhfml@4ax.com:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 14:50:59 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>news:q36a0jt85thsahmftu9q1jc76s7omjtpjt@4ax.com:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:50:19 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>news:nn590jlng5a2mspus759345k0efg68og9i@4ax.com:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 21:32:46 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Start with: https://www.history.com/news/13-colonies-school
I'm not interested in what some guy I never heard of named named >>Dave
Roos wrote
You got your religion and you're not open to facts.
<LOL> What religion do you imagine me to have?
MAGA
Do you not want to make America great again?
MAGA is a religion - and your idea of "great" was left in the trashcan
of history long ago.
You have a right to have that opinion, yet the polling shows that you
are in the minority... where you belong.
MAGA is in the minority - yet believe themselves to be even more than the majority.
"super70s" <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote in message news:uu559s$3toku$1@dont-email.me...
On 2024-03-28 14:21:31 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu30t4$3d7la$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid>
typed:
On 2024-03-28 04:22:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu285g$348lv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-27 18:39:17 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu1c4j$2t8t5$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Strange - you say State big government should get involved but not >>>>>>> National government!
Which is more responsive to its residents?
In my state they're more responsive to outside special interest
groups backed by billionaires like the Kochs, like those who
crammed a school voucher with public funding program down their
throats on the threat of throwing a lot of money into campaigns to >>>>> primary them.
Wow, public funding-- funds taken from the public
schools
Public schools don't generate funds, they consume funds... which come
from
taxpayers.
and used to pay for
private
schooling. Is that a problem?
It is to a lot of people, there's only so much money to go around
especially in a state that ranks 45th in education spending.
Shouldn't they be spending those precious taxpayer moneys in the best
manner
possible?
Sure rob poor Peter to pay rich Paul, the Republican credo. Most of those parents with kids in private schools are already well off.
So you feel that how you are treated should depend on your level of wealth with poor people having more rights than rich people?
On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 14:51:57 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >news:istc0jlkbs3u42fk62orvf0hl9ckeiqt9s@4ax.com:
On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 02:53:06 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>news:fk4b0jd0r0b664g9nahhsi60joolqqhfml@4ax.com:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 14:50:59 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>news:q36a0jt85thsahmftu9q1jc76s7omjtpjt@4ax.com:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:50:19 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>>news:nn590jlng5a2mspus759345k0efg68og9i@4ax.com:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 21:32:46 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Start with: https://www.history.com/news/13-colonies-school
I'm not interested in what some guy I never heard of named named >>>Dave
Roos wrote
You got your religion and you're not open to facts.
<LOL> What religion do you imagine me to have?
MAGA
Do you not want to make America great again?
MAGA is a religion - and your idea of "great" was left in the trashcan >>>of history long ago.
You have a right to have that opinion, yet the polling shows that you
are in the minority... where you belong.
MAGA is in the minority - yet believe themselves to be even more than the >majority.
I believe you are wrong. I believe the vast majority of US citizens
want to make America great again and the fact that only a small
minority of people think that the country is headed in the right
direction backs that up.
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message news:uu5aei$2csc$2@dont-email.me...
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in news:fk4b0jd0r0b664g9nahhsi60joolqqhfml@4ax.com:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 14:50:59 -0000 (UTC), BaxterDave
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>news:q36a0jt85thsahmftu9q1jc76s7omjtpjt@4ax.com:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:50:19 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>news:nn590jlng5a2mspus759345k0efg68og9i@4ax.com:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 21:32:46 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Start with: https://www.history.com/news/13-colonies-school
I'm not interested in what some guy I never heard of named named
Roos wrote
You got your religion and you're not open to facts.
<LOL> What religion do you imagine me to have?
MAGA
Do you not want to make America great again?
MAGA is a religion
So you're saying you don't want the US to be great?
"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in news:uu68s3 $903c$3@dont-email.me:
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message news:uu5abj$2csc$1@dont-email.me...$3
"max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in
news:uu42lb$3lj46$2@dont-email.me:
In news:uu4030$3kps7$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
"max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in news:uu2urh$3crn7
in@dont-email.me:
In news:l6jmq0Fg85hU1@mid.individual.net, Sam <samt@samt.invalid>
typed:
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 08:03:27 -0400, "Scout"
<me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:utlfma$3d8um$1@dont-email.me...
GEO <George@Foo.invalid> wrote in
news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public >>>>>>>>>> Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private >>>>>>>>>> schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they >>>>>>>>> teach is that if you are male you are female and you need to >>>>>>>>> wear a dress and make up.
More conservaturd propaganda.
So, schools are NOT encouraging transgenderism?
Even going to far as to keep parents ignorant of what their child >>>>>>> is doing in school?
No schools are not encouraging cross dressing. They just believe
to?freedom for the student to express themselves. Should the school >>>>>> forbid kids from singing the star spangled banner, if they want
It's the kids that are hiding, because the parents (like you) areNo, it's a free country. Only about 0.5% of the population is into >>>>>> cross dressing.
Relax.
He wrote "transgenderism," not "transvestism."
So? No schools are encouraging transgenderism either. That's a
medical issue with the kid and their parents.
So why are teachers encouraged to hide it from the parents?
abusive.
Assumes facts not in evidence,
The facts ARE in evidence
and doesn't explain teacher promoting and
encouraging transgenderism behavior.
Teachers/school districts are NOT "promoting and encouraging
transgenderism behavior".
That's all just conservaturd hate propaganda. They only support
transgender students - there is a difference.
On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 14:51:57 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
BlueBitch lied:
On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 02:53:06 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
BlueBitch lied:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 14:50:59 -0000 (UTC), BaxterDave
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
BlueBitch lied:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:50:19 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
BlueBitch lied:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 21:32:46 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
I'm not interested in what some guy I never heard of named named
Start with: https://www.history.com/news/13-colonies-school >>>>>>>>>
Roos wrote
You got your religion and you're not open to facts.
<LOL> What religion do you imagine me to have?
MAGA
Do you not want to make America great again?
MAGA is a religion - and your idea of "great" was left in the trashcan >>>> of history long ago.
You have a right to have that opinion, yet the polling shows that you
are in the minority... where you belong.
MAGA is in the minority - yet believe themselves to be even more than the
majority.
I believe you are wrong.
I believe the vast majority of US citizens
want to make America great again and
On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 02:53:06 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
BlueBitch lied:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 14:50:59 -0000 (UTC), BaxterDave
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
BlueBitch lied:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:50:19 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
BlueBitch lied:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 21:32:46 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Start with: https://www.history.com/news/13-colonies-school
I'm not interested in what some guy I never heard of named named
Roos wrote
You got your religion and you're not open to facts.
<LOL> What religion do you imagine me to have?
MAGA
Do you not want to make America great again?
MAGA is a religion
- and your idea of "great" was left in the trashcan of
history long ago.
You have a right to have that opinion, yet the polling shows that you
are in the minority
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message news:uu5aei$2csc$2@dont-email.me...
BlueBitch lied:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 14:50:59 -0000 (UTC), BaxterDave
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
BlueBitch lied:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:50:19 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
BlueBitch lied:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 21:32:46 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Start with: https://www.history.com/news/13-colonies-school
I'm not interested in what some guy I never heard of named named
Roos wrote
You got your religion and you're not open to facts.
<LOL>Â What religion do you imagine me to have?
MAGA
Do you not want to make America great again?
MAGA is a religion
So you're saying you don't want the US to be great?
In article <uu68s2$903c$2@dont-email.me>, me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net says...
"super70s" <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote in message
news:uu559s$3toku$1@dont-email.me...
On 2024-03-28 14:21:31 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu30t4$3d7la$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid>
typed:
On 2024-03-28 04:22:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu285g$348lv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-27 18:39:17 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu1c4j$2t8t5$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Strange - you say State big government should get involved but not >>>>>>>>> National government!
Which is more responsive to its residents?
In my state they're more responsive to outside special interest
groups backed by billionaires like the Kochs, like those who
crammed a school voucher with public funding program down their
throats on the threat of throwing a lot of money into campaigns to >>>>>>> primary them.
Wow, public funding-- funds taken from the public
schools
Public schools don't generate funds, they consume funds... which come
from taxpayers.
and used to pay for
private
schooling. Is that a problem?
It is to a lot of people, there's only so much money to go around
especially in a state that ranks 45th in education spending.
Shouldn't they be spending those precious taxpayer moneys in the best
manner possible?
Sure rob poor Peter to pay rich Paul, the Republican credo. Most of those >>> parents with kids in private schools are already well off.
So you feel that how you are treated should depend on your level of wealth >> with poor people having more rights than rich people?
I am still trying to figure out what his argument is.
On 3/29/2024 1:12 AM, BlueBitch lied:
On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 02:53:06 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
BlueBitch lied:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 14:50:59 -0000 (UTC), BaxterDave
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
BlueBitch lied:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:50:19 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
BlueBitch lied:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 21:32:46 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Start with: https://www.history.com/news/13-colonies-school
I'm not interested in what some guy I never heard of named named
Roos wrote
You got your religion and you're not open to facts.
<LOL> What religion do you imagine me to have?
MAGA
Do you not want to make America great again?
Trump and MAGA will not do that. They will destroy everything that is and ever
was good about America. They will turn America into Russia or worse.
MAGA is a religion
That's almost correct. MAGA is a cult.
- and your idea of "great" was left in the trashcan of
history long ago.
You have a right to have that opinion, yet the polling shows that you
are in the minority
No, BlueBitch, the polling shows that only a minority of Americans support Trump
and MAGA. 52.5% have an unfavorable opinion of Trump and MAGA, and only 42.6% have a favorable opinion.
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/favorability/donald-trump/
On 3/29/2024 8:32 AM, BlueBitch lied:
On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 14:51:57 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
BlueBitch lied:
On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 02:53:06 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
BlueBitch lied:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 14:50:59 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
BlueBitch lied:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:50:19 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
BlueBitch lied:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 21:32:46 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
I'm not interested in what some guy I never heard of named named >>>> Dave
Start with: https://www.history.com/news/13-colonies-school >>>>>>>>>
Roos wrote
You got your religion and you're not open to facts.
<LOL> What religion do you imagine me to have?
MAGA
Do you not want to make America great again?
MAGA is a religion - and your idea of "great" was left in the trashcan >>>> of history long ago.
You have a right to have that opinion, yet the polling shows that you
are in the minority... where you belong.
MAGA is in the minority - yet believe themselves to be even more than the >> majority.
I believe you are wrong.
No, BlueBitch, he's right.
Trump favorability rating:
Unfavorable: 52.5%
Favorable: 42.6%
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/favorability/donald-trump/
I believe the vast majority of US citizens
want to make America great again and
A majority believe that reelecting Trump won't achieve that, BlueBitch. A majority believe that reelecting Trump will make America *worse*, BlueBitch.
On 3/29/2024 4:25 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper, lied:
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message news:uu5aei$2csc$2@dont-email.me...
BlueBitch lied:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 14:50:59 -0000 (UTC), BaxterDave
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
BlueBitch lied:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:50:19 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
BlueBitch lied:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 21:32:46 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Start with: https://www.history.com/news/13-colonies-school
I'm not interested in what some guy I never heard of named named
Roos wrote
You got your religion and you're not open to facts.
<LOL> What religion do you imagine me to have?
MAGA
Do you not want to make America great again?
The cult of MAGA won't do that, scooter.
MAGA is a religion
It's a toxic cult.
So you're saying you don't want the US to be great?
He's saying that MAGA is a cult that makes America worse, scooter. He's right.
I believe you are wrong. I believe the vast majority of US citizens
want to make America great again
and the fact that only a small
minority of people think that the country is headed in the right
direction backs that up.
In article <t0ENN.116886$_a1e.96613@fx16.iad>, Iron_WhiteSupremacist@Systemic_Treason.KMA says...
He's saying that MAGA is a cult that makes America worse, scooter.
He's right.
He's saying he doesn't want to make America great. It sucks now and he
likes it that way.
On 3/29/2024 8:48 AM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/29/2024 7:55 AM, Lou Bricano wrote:
On 3/29/2024 7:38 AM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/28/2024 10:20 PM, Lou Bricano wrote:
{snip}
Who gets to decide that, and on what authority?
The courts under Article III.
What specifically in Article III says the courts get to decide the
definition of general welfare?
"The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity,
arising under this Constitution."
That does not give the courts power to *define* general welfare.
Helvering (to name one example) presented a case of whether Social
Security was constitutional. Under Article III, the courts had
jurisdiction to make that determination which required them to decide
what spending on the "general welfare" means.
The court doesn't get to create definitions of constitutional terms.
No. Good law is a description of what SCOTUS has held to be binding
precedent.
No. "Good law" to you is law that gives proggies what they want.
FFS, you troll. Citizens United - not what I want, but good law.
You have fabricated your definition of "good law." You're equivocating
on the meaning of "good."
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in >news:6607248f$0$1643532$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <t0ENN.116886$_a1e.96613@fx16.iad>,
Iron_WhiteSupremacist@Systemic_Treason.KMA says...
He's saying that MAGA is a cult that makes America worse, scooter.
He's right.
He's saying he doesn't want to make America great. It sucks now and he
likes it that way.
The problam is the "again" part. For over half of the American population, >it has NEVER BEEN GREAT - so they're looking forward - not back.
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >news:ngnd0jlqiodntsplp6ou15pl36s5hpenja@4ax.com:
I believe you are wrong. I believe the vast majority of US citizens
You live in an echo chamber.
want to make America great again
"Great again"? When was it great for blacks? For women? For LGBTQ?
and the fact that only a small
minority of people think that the country is headed in the right
direction backs that up.
Women, for one, certainly think it's going in the wrong direction.
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:6607248f$0$1643532$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <t0ENN.116886$_a1e.96613@fx16.iad>, Iron_WhiteSupremacist@Systemic_Treason.KMA says...
He's saying that MAGA is a cult that makes America worse, scooter.
He's right.
He's saying he doesn't want to make America great. It sucks now and he likes it that way.
The problam is the "again" part. For over half of the American population, it has NEVER BEEN GREAT - so they're looking forward - not back.
"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in news:uu68s3 $903c$3@dont-email.me:
$3
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:uu5abj$2csc$1@dont-email.me...
"max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in
news:uu42lb$3lj46$2@dont-email.me:
In news:uu4030$3kps7$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
"max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in news:uu2urh$3crn7
in@dont-email.me:
In news:l6jmq0Fg85hU1@mid.individual.net, Sam <samt@samt.invalid>
typed:
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 08:03:27 -0400, "Scout"
<me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:utlfma$3d8um$1@dont-email.me...
GEO <George@Foo.invalid> wrote in
news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public >>>>>>>>>>> Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private >>>>>>>>>>> schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they >>>>>>>>>> teach is that if you are male you are female and you need to >>>>>>>>>> wear a dress and make up.
More conservaturd propaganda.
So, schools are NOT encouraging transgenderism?
Even going to far as to keep parents ignorant of what their child >>>>>>>> is doing in school?
No schools are not encouraging cross dressing. They just believe
to?freedom for the student to express themselves. Should the school >>>>>>> forbid kids from singing the star spangled banner, if they want
It's the kids that are hiding, because the parents (like you) areNo, it's a free country. Only about 0.5% of the population is into >>>>>>> cross dressing.
Relax.
He wrote "transgenderism," not "transvestism."
So? No schools are encouraging transgenderism either. That's a
medical issue with the kid and their parents.
So why are teachers encouraged to hide it from the parents?
abusive.
Assumes facts not in evidence,
The facts ARE in evidence
and doesn't explain teacher promoting and
encouraging transgenderism behavior.
Teachers/school districts are NOT "promoting and encouraging
transgenderism behavior".
That's all just conservaturd hate propaganda. They only support
transgender students - there is a difference.
On 3/29/2024 4:25 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper, lied:
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:uu5aei$2csc$2@dont-email.me...
BlueBitch lied:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 14:50:59 -0000 (UTC), BaxterDave
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
BlueBitch lied:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:50:19 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
BlueBitch lied:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 21:32:46 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Start with: https://www.history.com/news/13-colonies-school
I'm not interested in what some guy I never heard of named named
Roos wrote
You got your religion and you're not open to facts.
<LOL> What religion do you imagine me to have?
MAGA
Do you not want to make America great again?
The cult of MAGA won't do that, scooter.
MAGA is a religion
It's a toxic cult.
So you're saying you don't want the US to be great?
He's saying that MAGA is a cult that makes America worse, scooter. He's right.
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:6607248f$0$1643532$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <t0ENN.116886$_a1e.96613@fx16.iad>,
Iron_WhiteSupremacist@Systemic_Treason.KMA says...
He's saying that MAGA is a cult that makes America worse, scooter.
He's right.
He's saying he doesn't want to make America great. It sucks now and he
likes it that way.
The problam is the "again" part.
For over half of the American population,
it has NEVER BEEN GREAT
- so they're looking forward - not back.
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in news:istc0jlkbs3u42fk62orvf0hl9ckeiqt9s@4ax.com:
On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 02:53:06 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>news:fk4b0jd0r0b664g9nahhsi60joolqqhfml@4ax.com:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 14:50:59 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>news:q36a0jt85thsahmftu9q1jc76s7omjtpjt@4ax.com:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:50:19 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>>news:nn590jlng5a2mspus759345k0efg68og9i@4ax.com:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 21:32:46 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Start with: https://www.history.com/news/13-colonies-school
I'm not interested in what some guy I never heard of named named >>>Dave
Roos wrote
You got your religion and you're not open to facts.
<LOL> What religion do you imagine me to have?
MAGA
Do you not want to make America great again?
MAGA is a religion - and your idea of "great" was left in the trashcan
of history long ago.
You have a right to have that opinion, yet the polling shows that you
are in the minority... where you belong.
MAGA is in the minority
In article <ngnd0jlqiodntsplp6ou15pl36s5hpenja@4ax.com>, Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA says...
On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 14:51:57 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:istc0jlkbs3u42fk62orvf0hl9ckeiqt9s@4ax.com:
On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 02:53:06 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:fk4b0jd0r0b664g9nahhsi60joolqqhfml@4ax.com:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 14:50:59 -0000 (UTC), BaxterDave
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:q36a0jt85thsahmftu9q1jc76s7omjtpjt@4ax.com:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:50:19 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:nn590jlng5a2mspus759345k0efg68og9i@4ax.com:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 21:32:46 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Start with: https://www.history.com/news/13-colonies-school
I'm not interested in what some guy I never heard of named named
Roos wrote
You got your religion and you're not open to facts.
<LOL> What religion do you imagine me to have?
MAGA
Do you not want to make America great again?
MAGA is a religion - and your idea of "great" was left in the trashcan
of history long ago.
You have a right to have that opinion, yet the polling shows that you
are in the minority... where you belong.
MAGA is in the minority - yet believe themselves to be even more than
the
majority.
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/
https://www.realclearpolling.com/latest-polls
I believe you are wrong. I believe the vast majority of US citizens
want to make America great again and the fact that only a small
minority of people think that the country is headed in the right
direction backs that up.
In article <uu68s2$903c$2@dont-email.me>, me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net says...
"super70s" <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote in message
news:uu559s$3toku$1@dont-email.me...
On 2024-03-28 14:21:31 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu30t4$3d7la$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid>
typed:
On 2024-03-28 04:22:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu285g$348lv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-27 18:39:17 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu1c4j$2t8t5$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Strange - you say State big government should get involved but
not
National government!
Which is more responsive to its residents?
In my state they're more responsive to outside special interest
groups backed by billionaires like the Kochs, like those who
crammed a school voucher with public funding program down their
throats on the threat of throwing a lot of money into campaigns to
primary them.
Wow, public funding-- funds taken from the public
schools
Public schools don't generate funds, they consume funds... which come
from
taxpayers.
and used to pay for
private
schooling. Is that a problem?
It is to a lot of people, there's only so much money to go around
especially in a state that ranks 45th in education spending.
Shouldn't they be spending those precious taxpayer moneys in the best
manner
possible?
Sure rob poor Peter to pay rich Paul, the Republican credo. Most of
those
parents with kids in private schools are already well off.
So you feel that how you are treated should depend on your level of
wealth
with poor people having more rights than rich people?
I am still trying to figure out what his argument is.
In article <uu7u3u$ol5i$2@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:6607248f$0$1643532$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <t0ENN.116886$_a1e.96613@fx16.iad>,
Iron_WhiteSupremacist@Systemic_Treason.KMA says...
He's saying that MAGA is a cult that makes America worse, scooter.
He's right.
He's saying he doesn't want to make America great. It sucks now and he
likes it that way.
The problam is the "again" part. For over half of the American population, >> it has NEVER BEEN GREAT - so they're looking forward - not back.
Did you talk to all of them?
On 3/29/2024 9:25 AM, Lou Bricano wrote:
You have fabricated your definition of "good law." You're equivocating
on the meaning of "good."
No, I have always used "good law" to describe binding precedent.
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 02:33:07 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>news:ngnd0jlqiodntsplp6ou15pl36s5hpenja@4ax.com:
I believe you are wrong. I believe the vast majority of US citizens
You live in an echo chamber.
want to make America great again
"Great again"? When was it great for blacks? For women? For LGBTQ?
Great for everyone when Trump was Presodent.
and the fact that only a small
minority of people think that the country is headed in the right
direction backs that up.
Women, for one, certainly think it's going in the wrong direction.
Biden leads a little with all women, but not as much as it used to be.
On 3/29/2024 9:25 AM, Lou Bricano wrote:
On 3/29/2024 8:48 AM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/29/2024 7:55 AM, Lou Bricano wrote:
On 3/29/2024 7:38 AM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 3/28/2024 10:20 PM, Lou Bricano wrote:
{snip}
Who gets to decide that, and on what authority?
The courts under Article III.
What specifically in Article III says the courts get to decide the
definition of general welfare?
"The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising >>> under this Constitution."
That does not give the courts power to *define* general welfare.
They have to put forth some standard for what constitutes "general welfare" in
order to rule on the case presented to them and provide guidance to lower courts
on future cases.
Helvering (to name one example) presented a case of whether Social Security >>> was constitutional. Under Article III, the courts had jurisdiction to make >>> that determination which required them to decide what spending on the
"general welfare" means.
The court doesn't get to create definitions of constitutional terms.
No. Good law is a description of what SCOTUS has held to be binding precedent.
No. "Good law" to you is law that gives proggies what they want.
FFS, you troll. Citizens United - not what I want, but good law.
You have fabricated your definition of "good law." You're equivocating on the
meaning of "good."
No, I have always used "good law" to describe binding precedent.
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message news:uu6l4e$bjij$2@dont-email.me...
"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in news:uu68s3
$903c$3@dont-email.me:
$3
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:uu5abj$2csc$1@dont-email.me...
"max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in
news:uu42lb$3lj46$2@dont-email.me:
In news:uu4030$3kps7$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
"max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in news:uu2urh$3crn7
in@dont-email.me:
In news:l6jmq0Fg85hU1@mid.individual.net, Sam <samt@samt.invalid> >>>>>>> typed:
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 08:03:27 -0400, "Scout"
<me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:utlfma$3d8um$1@dont-email.me...
GEO <George@Foo.invalid> wrote in
news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public >>>>>>>>>>>> Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private >>>>>>>>>>>> schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they >>>>>>>>>>> teach is that if you are male you are female and you need to >>>>>>>>>>> wear a dress and make up.
More conservaturd propaganda.
So, schools are NOT encouraging transgenderism?
Even going to far as to keep parents ignorant of what their child >>>>>>>>> is doing in school?
No schools are not encouraging cross dressing. They just believe
to?freedom for the student to express themselves. Should the school >>>>>>>> forbid kids from singing the star spangled banner, if they want
It's the kids that are hiding, because the parents (like you) areNo, it's a free country. Only about 0.5% of the population is into >>>>>>>> cross dressing.
Relax.
He wrote "transgenderism," not "transvestism."
So? No schools are encouraging transgenderism either. That's a >>>>>> medical issue with the kid and their parents.
So why are teachers encouraged to hide it from the parents?
abusive.
Assumes facts not in evidence,
The facts ARE in evidence
and doesn't explain teacher promoting and
encouraging transgenderism behavior.
Teachers/school districts are NOT "promoting and encouraging
transgenderism behavior".
reports and evidence would suggest otherwise.
That's all just conservaturd hate propaganda. They only support
transgender students - there is a difference.
So in a school, there should be no more than 1 or 2 transgender in 1,000 students. yet advocate teachers seem to have far more than that.
Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote in news:uu8407$pv0q$1@dont- email.me:
On 3/29/2024 9:25 AM, Lou Bricano wrote:
You have fabricated your definition of "good law." You're equivocating
on the meaning of "good."
No, I have always used "good law" to describe binding precedent.
so following Dred Scott precedent is "good law"?!!
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message news:uu6kic$bjij$1@dont-email.me...
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:istc0jlkbs3u42fk62orvf0hl9ckeiqt9s@4ax.com:
On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 02:53:06 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:fk4b0jd0r0b664g9nahhsi60joolqqhfml@4ax.com:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 14:50:59 -0000 (UTC), BaxterDave
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:q36a0jt85thsahmftu9q1jc76s7omjtpjt@4ax.com:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:50:19 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>>> news:nn590jlng5a2mspus759345k0efg68og9i@4ax.com:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 21:32:46 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
I'm not interested in what some guy I never heard of named named
Start with: https://www.history.com/news/13-colonies-school >>>>>>>>>
Roos wrote
You got your religion and you're not open to facts.
<LOL>Â What religion do you imagine me to have?
MAGA
Do you not want to make America great again?
MAGA is a religion - and your idea of "great" was left in the trashcan >>>> of history long ago.
You have a right to have that opinion, yet the polling shows that you
are in the minority...  where you belong.
MAGA is in the minority
Maybe, maybe not,
"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message news:660705ac$0$6335$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
In article <uu68s2$903c$2@dont-email.me>,
me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net says...
"super70s" <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote in message
news:uu559s$3toku$1@dont-email.me...
On 2024-03-28 14:21:31 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu30t4$3d7la$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid>
typed:
On 2024-03-28 04:22:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu285g$348lv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-27 18:39:17 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu1c4j$2t8t5$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Strange - you say State big government should get involved but
not
National government!
Which is more responsive to its residents?
In my state they're more responsive to outside special interest
groups backed by billionaires like the Kochs, like those who
crammed a school voucher with public funding program down their
throats on the threat of throwing a lot of money into campaigns to >>> >>>>> primary them.
Wow, public funding-- funds taken from the public
schools
Public schools don't generate funds, they consume funds... which come >>> >> from
taxpayers.
and used to pay for
private
schooling. Is that a problem?
It is to a lot of people, there's only so much money to go around
especially in a state that ranks 45th in education spending.
Shouldn't they be spending those precious taxpayer moneys in the best >>> >> manner
possible?
Sure rob poor Peter to pay rich Paul, the Republican credo. Most of > those
parents with kids in private schools are already well off.
So you feel that how you are treated should depend on your level of wealth >>> with poor people having more rights than rich people?
I am still *SLURRRPPPP*!
I'm sure *SLURRRPPPP*!
"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message news:6607056f$0$6314$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
In article <ngnd0jlqiodntsplp6ou15pl36s5hpenja@4ax.com>,
Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA says...
On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 14:51:57 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:istc0jlkbs3u42fk62orvf0hl9ckeiqt9s@4ax.com:
On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 02:53:06 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:fk4b0jd0r0b664g9nahhsi60joolqqhfml@4ax.com:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 14:50:59 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:q36a0jt85thsahmftu9q1jc76s7omjtpjt@4ax.com:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:50:19 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:nn590jlng5a2mspus759345k0efg68og9i@4ax.com:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 21:32:46 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Start with: https://www.history.com/news/13-colonies-school
I'm not interested in what some guy I never heard of named named >>> >>>Dave
Roos wrote
You got your religion and you're not open to facts.
<LOL>Â What religion do you imagine me to have?
MAGA
Do you not want to make America great again?
MAGA is a religion - and your idea of "great" was left in the trashcan >>> >>>of history long ago.
You have a right to have that opinion, yet the polling shows that you >>> >> are in the minority...  where you belong.
MAGA is in the minority - yet believe themselves to be even more than >the >>> >majority.
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/
https://www.realclearpolling.com/latest-polls
But let's see what the answer is given the real question:
"Only 23% of Americans think the country is headed in the right direction."
"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message news:660705ac$0$6335$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
In article <uu68s2$903c$2@dont-email.me>,
me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net says...
"super70s" <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote in message
news:uu559s$3toku$1@dont-email.me...
On 2024-03-28 14:21:31 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu30t4$3d7la$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid>
typed:
On 2024-03-28 04:22:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu285g$348lv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-27 18:39:17 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu1c4j$2t8t5$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Strange - you say State big government should get involved but
not
National government!
Which is more responsive to its residents?
In my state they're more responsive to outside special interest
groups backed by billionaires like the Kochs, like those who
crammed a school voucher with public funding program down their
throats on the threat of throwing a lot of money into campaigns to >>> >>>>> primary them.
Wow, public funding-- funds taken from the public
schools
Public schools don't generate funds, they consume funds... which come >>> >> from
taxpayers.
and used to pay for
private
schooling. Is that a problem?
It is to a lot of people, there's only so much money to go around
especially in a state that ranks 45th in education spending.
Shouldn't they be spending those precious taxpayer moneys in the best >>> >> manner
possible?
Sure rob poor Peter to pay rich Paul, the Republican credo. Most of > those
parents with kids in private schools are already well off.
So you feel that how you are treated should depend on your level of wealth >>> with poor people having more rights than rich people?
I am still *SLURRRPPPP*!
I'm sure *SLURRRPPPP*!
"Blue Lives Matter" <Iron_WhiteSupremacist@Systemic_Treason.KMA> wrote in message news:t0ENN.116886$_a1e.96613@fx16.iad...
On 3/29/2024 4:25 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper, lied:
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:uu5aei$2csc$2@dont-email.me...
BlueBitch lied:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 14:50:59 -0000 (UTC), BaxterDave
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
BlueBitch lied:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:50:19 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
BlueBitch lied:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 21:32:46 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
I'm not interested in what some guy I never heard of named named
Start with: https://www.history.com/news/13-colonies-school >>>>>>>>>
Roos wrote
You got your religion and you're not open to facts.
<LOL>Â What religion do you imagine me to have?
MAGA
Do you not want to make America great again?
The cult of MAGA won't do that, scooter.
Well
we certainly know that Democrats won't.
Do you not want to make America great again?
MAGA is a religion
It's a toxic cult.
Says the person who is utterly
So you're saying you don't want the US to be great?
He's saying that MAGA is a cult that makes America worse, scooter. He's right.
If he said Democrats I might believe him.
"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message news:660705ac$0$6335$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
In article <uu68s2$903c$2@dont-email.me>,
me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net says...
"super70s" <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote in message
news:uu559s$3toku$1@dont-email.me...
On 2024-03-28 14:21:31 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu30t4$3d7la$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid>
typed:
On 2024-03-28 04:22:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu285g$348lv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-27 18:39:17 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu1c4j$2t8t5$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Strange - you say State big government should get involved but not >>>>>>>>>> National government!
Which is more responsive to its residents?
In my state they're more responsive to outside special interest >>>>>>>> groups backed by billionaires like the Kochs, like those who
crammed a school voucher with public funding program down their >>>>>>>> throats on the threat of throwing a lot of money into campaigns to >>>>>>>> primary them.
Wow, public funding-- funds taken from the public
schools
Public schools don't generate funds, they consume funds... which come >>>>> from
taxpayers.
and used to pay for
private
schooling. Is that a problem?
It is to a lot of people, there's only so much money to go around
especially in a state that ranks 45th in education spending.
Shouldn't they be spending those precious taxpayer moneys in the best >>>>> manner
possible?
Sure rob poor Peter to pay rich Paul, the Republican credo. Most of those >>>> parents with kids in private schools are already well off.
So you feel that how you are treated should depend on your level of wealth >>> with poor people having more rights than rich people?
I am still trying to figure out what his argument is.
I'm sure he doesn't know either.
"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message news:6607056f$0$6314$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
In article <ngnd0jlqiodntsplp6ou15pl36s5hpenja@4ax.com>,
Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA says...
On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 14:51:57 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:istc0jlkbs3u42fk62orvf0hl9ckeiqt9s@4ax.com:
On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 02:53:06 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:fk4b0jd0r0b664g9nahhsi60joolqqhfml@4ax.com:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 14:50:59 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:q36a0jt85thsahmftu9q1jc76s7omjtpjt@4ax.com:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:50:19 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:nn590jlng5a2mspus759345k0efg68og9i@4ax.com:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 21:32:46 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Start with: https://www.history.com/news/13-colonies-school
I'm not interested in what some guy I never heard of named named >>> >>>Dave
Roos wrote
You got your religion and you're not open to facts.
<LOL>Â What religion do you imagine me to have?
MAGA
Do you not want to make America great again?
MAGA is a religion - and your idea of "great" was left in the trashcan >>> >>>of history long ago.
You have a right to have that opinion, yet the polling shows that you >>> >> are in the minority...  where you belong.
MAGA is in the minority - yet believe themselves to be even more than >the >>> >majority.
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/
https://www.realclearpolling.com/latest-polls
But let's see what the answer is given the real question:
"Only 23% of Americans think the country is headed in the right direction."
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/americans-country-headed-wrong-direction-poll/story?id=104633234
On 3/30/2024 6:45 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper, lied:
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message news:uu6kic$bjij$1@dont-email.me...
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:istc0jlkbs3u42fk62orvf0hl9ckeiqt9s@4ax.com:
On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 02:53:06 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:fk4b0jd0r0b664g9nahhsi60joolqqhfml@4ax.com:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 14:50:59 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>> news:q36a0jt85thsahmftu9q1jc76s7omjtpjt@4ax.com:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:50:19 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>>> news:nn590jlng5a2mspus759345k0efg68og9i@4ax.com:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 21:32:46 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
I'm not interested in what some guy I never heard of named named >>>> Dave
Start with: https://www.history.com/news/13-colonies-school >>>>>>>>>
Roos wrote
You got your religion and you're not open to facts.
<LOL> What religion do you imagine me to have?
MAGA
Do you not want to make America great again?
MAGA is a religion - and your idea of "great" was left in the trashcan >>>> of history long ago.
You have a right to have that opinion, yet the polling shows that you
are in the minority... where you belong.
MAGA is in the minority
Maybe, maybe not,
There is no "maybe" about it, scooter. MAGA, the toxic racist cult founded by the toxic racist wannabe dictator, is in the minority.
On 3/30/2024 6:47 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper, lied:
"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message news:6607056f$0$6314$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
In article <ngnd0jlqiodntsplp6ou15pl36s5hpenja@4ax.com>,
Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA says...
On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 14:51:57 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:istc0jlkbs3u42fk62orvf0hl9ckeiqt9s@4ax.com:
On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 02:53:06 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:fk4b0jd0r0b664g9nahhsi60joolqqhfml@4ax.com:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 14:50:59 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:q36a0jt85thsahmftu9q1jc76s7omjtpjt@4ax.com:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:50:19 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>> >>>>>>>news:nn590jlng5a2mspus759345k0efg68og9i@4ax.com:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 21:32:46 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Start with: https://www.history.com/news/13-colonies-school
I'm not interested in what some guy I never heard of named named >>> >>>Dave
Roos wrote
You got your religion and you're not open to facts.
<LOL> What religion do you imagine me to have?
MAGA
Do you not want to make America great again?
MAGA is a religion - and your idea of "great" was left in the trashcan >>> >>>of history long ago.
You have a right to have that opinion, yet the polling shows that you >>> >> are in the minority... where you belong.
MAGA is in the minority - yet believe themselves to be even more than >the
majority.
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/
https://www.realclearpolling.com/latest-polls
But let's see what the answer is given the real question:
"Only 23% of Americans think the country is headed in the right direction."
That in *no way* means that a majority think the toxic MAGA cult is the right direction. It is *not* the right direction, scooter. It's a regressive cult that
wants to return America to the bad old days.
On 3/30/2024 6:35 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper, lied:
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message news:uu6l4e$bjij$2@dont-email.me...
"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in news:uu68s3 >> $903c$3@dont-email.me:
$3
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:uu5abj$2csc$1@dont-email.me...
"max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in
news:uu42lb$3lj46$2@dont-email.me:
In news:uu4030$3kps7$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
"max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in news:uu2urh$3crn7
in@dont-email.me:
In news:l6jmq0Fg85hU1@mid.individual.net, Sam <samt@samt.invalid> >>>>>>> typed:
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 08:03:27 -0400, "Scout"
<me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:utlfma$3d8um$1@dont-email.me...
GEO <George@Foo.invalid> wrote in
news:utkv8c$36001$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-03-22, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
What do you think School Vouchers are about? Strip the Public >>>>>>>>>>>> Schools of any ability to actually educate, fund those private >>>>>>>>>>>> schools that indoctrinate.
You really think public schools educate? The only thing they >>>>>>>>>>> teach is that if you are male you are female and you need to >>>>>>>>>>> wear a dress and make up.
More conservaturd propaganda.
So, schools are NOT encouraging transgenderism?
Even going to far as to keep parents ignorant of what their child >>>>>>>>> is doing in school?
No schools are not encouraging cross dressing. They just believe
to?freedom for the student to express themselves. Should the school >>>>>>>> forbid kids from singing the star spangled banner, if they want
It's the kids that are hiding, because the parents (like you) areNo, it's a free country. Only about 0.5% of the population is into >>>>>>>> cross dressing.
Relax.
He wrote "transgenderism," not "transvestism."
So? No schools are encouraging transgenderism either. That's a >>>>>> medical issue with the kid and their parents.
So why are teachers encouraged to hide it from the parents?
abusive.
Assumes facts not in evidence,
The facts ARE in evidence
and doesn't explain teacher promoting and
encouraging transgenderism behavior.
Teachers/school districts are NOT "promoting and encouraging
transgenderism behavior".
reports and evidence would suggest otherwise.
Cite them, scooter.
<crickets>
That's all just conservaturd hate propaganda. They only support
transgender students - there is a difference.
So in a school, there should be no more than 1 or 2 transgender in 1,000 students. yet advocate teachers seem to have far more than that.
There are no "advocate teachers," scooter. You made that up.
On 3/30/2024 6:39 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper, lied:
"Blue Lives Matter" <Iron_WhiteSupremacist@Systemic_Treason.KMA> wrote in message news:t0ENN.116886$_a1e.96613@fx16.iad...
On 3/29/2024 4:25 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper, lied:
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:uu5aei$2csc$2@dont-email.me...
BlueBitch lied:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 14:50:59 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
BlueBitch lied:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:50:19 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
BlueBitch lied:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 21:32:46 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
I'm not interested in what some guy I never heard of named named >>>> Dave
Start with: https://www.history.com/news/13-colonies-school >>>>>>>>>
Roos wrote
You got your religion and you're not open to facts.
<LOL> What religion do you imagine me to have?
MAGA
Do you not want to make America great again?
The cult of MAGA won't do that, scooter.
Well
More empty scooter wheeze
"Further..." [empty padding]
"Naturally, ..." [empty padding]
"And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an opponent immediately before fleeing]
"On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never* refuting]
"And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something irrelevant and pointless]
"Heck..." [empty padding]
"Well..." [empty padding]
"After all..." [empty padding]
"In fact..." [empty padding]
"Indeed..." [empty padding}
we certainly know that Democrats won't.
No, scooter. What we know is that Trump and the toxic and racist and xenophobic
MAGA cult won't.
Do you not want to make America great again?
Yes, and I know that MAGA won't do that. MAGA is a regressive and toxic and racist cult.
MAGA is a religion
It's a toxic cult.
Says the person who is utterly
right on everything. Yes.
So you're saying you don't want the US to be great?
He's saying that MAGA is a cult that makes America worse, scooter. He's right.
If he said Democrats I might believe him.
No, bad as the Democrats are, scooter, they are orders of magnitude better than
the toxic racist regressive MAGA cult. They don't stage coups and insurrections,
and they don't call Nazis and KKK "fine people." You and Trump and MAGA do that.
On 3/30/2024 6:47 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper, lied:
"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message news:6607056f$0$6314$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
In article <ngnd0jlqiodntsplp6ou15pl36s5hpenja@4ax.com>,
Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA says...
On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 14:51:57 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:istc0jlkbs3u42fk62orvf0hl9ckeiqt9s@4ax.com:
On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 02:53:06 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:fk4b0jd0r0b664g9nahhsi60joolqqhfml@4ax.com:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 14:50:59 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:q36a0jt85thsahmftu9q1jc76s7omjtpjt@4ax.com:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:50:19 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>> >>>>>>>news:nn590jlng5a2mspus759345k0efg68og9i@4ax.com:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 21:32:46 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Start with: https://www.history.com/news/13-colonies-school
I'm not interested in what some guy I never heard of named named >>> >>>Dave
Roos wrote
You got your religion and you're not open to facts.
<LOL> What religion do you imagine me to have?
MAGA
Do you not want to make America great again?
MAGA is a religion - and your idea of "great" was left in the trashcan >>> >>>of history long ago.
You have a right to have that opinion, yet the polling shows that you >>> >> are in the minority... where you belong.
MAGA is in the minority - yet believe themselves to be even more than >the
majority.
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/
https://www.realclearpolling.com/latest-polls
But let's see what the answer is given the real question:
"Only 23% of Americans think the country is headed in the right direction."
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/americans-country-headed-wrong-direction-poll/story?id=104633234
*Very* interesting that you'd post this four and a half month old poll result,
scooter. Here's what it has to say:
A year before the presidential election, three-quarters of Americans (76%)
believe the country is headed in the wrong direction and the leading
Democratic and Republican candidates are viewed broadly unfavorably,
according to a new ABC News/Ipsos poll. Only 23% of Americans think the
country is headed in the right direction.
Republicans are overwhelmingly negative, with 95% thinking things in this
country are heading in the wrong direction, followed by 76% of independents
and 54% of Democrats, according to the poll.
Among the two candidates most likely to face off again in 2024, one in three
(33%) Americans view President Joe Biden favorably, while former President
Donald Trump is viewed favorably by only 29%, according to the poll.
People might not like Biden much, scooter, but they like Trump *even less* than
they like Biden.
95% of Republiscums/QAnon thinking the country is "headed in the wrong direction" is just a fucking joke. They say that *solely* because a Democrat is
in the White House. It has nothing to do with the *actual* direction in which the country is headed. The real, verified, non-partisan economic metrics all say
that the economy is doing great and is likely to continue doing great ? not guaranteed, but likely. There are plenty of problems in foreign affairs, but when people express satisfaction or dissatisfaction with the direction the country is heading, they seldom mean that based on foreign affairs. They mean domestically, and people have no valid reason to think domestically we're headed
in a wrong direction.
This kind of poll is absurd.
Pollster: "Do you think the country is headed in the right direction?"
MAGA fuckwit: "No."
Pollster: "Why not?"
MAGA fuckwit: "Umm...errr...ahhh...[koff koff]...I dunno."
There's never any followup
On 2024-03-30 13:50:48 +0000, Scout said:
"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
news:660705ac$0$6335$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
In article <uu68s2$903c$2@dont-email.me>,
me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net says...
"super70s" <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote in message
news:uu559s$3toku$1@dont-email.me...
On 2024-03-28 14:21:31 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu30t4$3d7la$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid>
typed:
On 2024-03-28 04:22:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu285g$348lv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-27 18:39:17 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu1c4j$2t8t5$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Strange - you say State big government should get involved but not >>>>>>>>>>> National government!
Which is more responsive to its residents?
In my state they're more responsive to outside special interest >>>>>>>>> groups backed by billionaires like the Kochs, like those who >>>>>>>>> crammed a school voucher with public funding program down their >>>>>>>>> throats on the threat of throwing a lot of money into campaigns to >>>>>>>>> primary them.
Wow, public funding-- funds taken from the public
schools
Public schools don't generate funds, they consume funds... which come >>>>>> from
taxpayers.
and used to pay for
private
schooling. Is that a problem?
It is to a lot of people, there's only so much money to go around >>>>>>> especially in a state that ranks 45th in education spending.
Shouldn't they be spending those precious taxpayer moneys in the best >>>>>> manner
possible?
Sure rob poor Peter to pay rich Paul, the Republican credo. Most of those >>>>> parents with kids in private schools are already well off.
So you feel that how you are treated should depend on your level of wealth >>>> with poor people having more rights than rich people?
I am still trying to figure out what his argument is.
I'm sure he doesn't know either.
When you two finish your circle jerk
here's a story that explains all about it:
REVEALED: Secret recording shows pressure on Republican lawmakers to vote for school vouchers
https://www.newschannel5.com/news/newschannel-5-investigates/revealed/revealed-secret-recording-shows-pressure-on-republican-lawmakers-to-vote-for-school-vouchers
More blacks and Hispanics are supporting Trump.
Trump is ahead.
On 2024-03-28 14:21:31 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu30t4$3d7la$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-28 04:22:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu285g$348lv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-27 18:39:17 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu1c4j$2t8t5$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Strange - you say State big government should get involved but
not National government!
Which is more responsive to its residents?
In my state they're more responsive to outside special interest
groups backed by billionaires like the Kochs, like those who
crammed a school voucher with public funding program down their
throats on the threat of throwing a lot of money into campaigns to
primary them.
Wow, public funding-- funds taken from the public
schools
Public schools don't generate funds, they consume funds... which
come from taxpayers.
and used to pay for
private
schooling. Is that a problem?
It is to a lot of people, there's only so much money to go around
especially in a state that ranks 45th in education spending.
Shouldn't they be spending those precious taxpayer moneys in the
best manner possible?
Sure rob poor Peter to pay rich Paul, the Republican credo....
... Most of those parents with kids in private schools are already well off.
If you want to send your kids to a private school or homeschool
yourself do it on your own dime.
How about the government letting me keep the portion of my taxes
that are spent on government schools so I can fund a better choice?
Aren't you pro-choice?
<laugh> Suddenly the right-wing is "pro-choice" when it comes to
vouchers.
Don't you want your kids to have the best education available?
I want everyone's kids to have the best education available, not just
my own.
Skeeter wrote:
Trump is ahead.
yes, a dickhead
On 3/30/2024 10:06 AM, super70s wrote:
On 2024-03-30 13:50:48 +0000, Scout said:
"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
news:660705ac$0$6335$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
In article <uu68s2$903c$2@dont-email.me>,
me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net says...
"super70s" <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote in message
news:uu559s$3toku$1@dont-email.me...
On 2024-03-28 14:21:31 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu30t4$3d7la$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid>
typed:
On 2024-03-28 04:22:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu285g$348lv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-27 18:39:17 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu1c4j$2t8t5$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Strange - you say State big government should get involved but not
National government!
Which is more responsive to its residents?
In my state they're more responsive to outside special interest >>>>>>>>> groups backed by billionaires like the Kochs, like those who >>>>>>>>> crammed a school voucher with public funding program down their >>>>>>>>> throats on the threat of throwing a lot of money into campaigns to >>>>>>>>> primary them.
Wow, public funding-- funds taken from the public
schools
Public schools don't generate funds, they consume funds... which come >>>>>> from
taxpayers.
and used to pay for
private
schooling. Is that a problem?
It is to a lot of people, there's only so much money to go around >>>>>>> especially in a state that ranks 45th in education spending.
Shouldn't they be spending those precious taxpayer moneys in the best >>>>>> manner
possible?
Sure rob poor Peter to pay rich Paul, the Republican credo. Most of those
parents with kids in private schools are already well off.
So you feel that how you are treated should depend on your level of wealth
with poor people having more rights than rich people?
I am still trying to figure out what his argument is.
I'm sure he doesn't know either.
When you two finish your circle jerk
That's all it ever is when scooter, the drunken Virginia camper, replies to one
of his fellow right-wingnut extremists.
here's a story that explains all about it:
REVEALED: Secret recording shows pressure on Republican lawmakers to vote for
school vouchers
https://www.newschannel5.com/news/newschannel-5-investigates/revealed/revealed-secret-recording-shows-pressure-on-republican-lawmakers-to-vote-for-school-vouchers
In article <17c19d4ef2cee82b$125929$1351842
$60dd6a6a@news.thecubenet.com>, precent@yohoo.not says...
Skeeter wrote:
More blacks and Hispanics are supporting Trump.>
oh great, even more criminals
just you wait
Skeeter wrote:
In article <17c19d4ef2cee82b$125929$1351842
$60dd6a6a@news.thecubenet.com>, precent@yohoo.not says...
Skeeter wrote:
More blacks and Hispanics are supporting Trump.>
oh great, even more criminals
just you wait
too late
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >news:6tff0jhrbovvuu187egshu48m8n8jf5r4f@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 02:33:07 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>news:ngnd0jlqiodntsplp6ou15pl36s5hpenja@4ax.com:
I believe you are wrong. I believe the vast majority of US citizens
You live in an echo chamber.
want to make America great again
"Great again"? When was it great for blacks? For women? For LGBTQ?
Great for everyone when Trump was Presodent.
and the fact that only a small
minority of people think that the country is headed in the right
direction backs that up.
Women, for one, certainly think it's going in the wrong direction.
Biden leads a little with all women, but not as much as it used to be.
Yet somehow tRump has NEVER actually won an election.
On 3/30/2024 7:44 AM, Baxter wrote:
Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote in news:uu8407$pv0q$1@dont-
email.me:
On 3/29/2024 9:25 AM, Lou Bricano wrote:
You have fabricated your definition of "good law." You're equivocating >>>> on the meaning of "good."
No, I have always used "good law" to describe binding precedent.
so following Dred Scott precedent is "good law"?!!
It was good law (binding precedent) until the 13th Amendment. "Good law" doesn't imply the decision was good.
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 14:47:00 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:be.
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>news:6tff0jhrbovvuu187egshu48m8n8jf5r4f@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 02:33:07 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>news:ngnd0jlqiodntsplp6ou15pl36s5hpenja@4ax.com:
I believe you are wrong. I believe the vast majority of US citizens
You live in an echo chamber.
want to make America great again
"Great again"? When was it great for blacks? For women? For LGBTQ?
Great for everyone when Trump was Presodent.
and the fact that only a small
minority of people think that the country is headed in the right
direction backs that up.
Women, for one, certainly think it's going in the wrong direction.
Biden leads a little with all women, but not as much as it used to
Yet somehow tRump has NEVER actually won an election.
<EYEROLL>
In news:uu559s$3toku$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-28 14:21:31 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu30t4$3d7la$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-28 04:22:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu285g$348lv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-27 18:39:17 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu1c4j$2t8t5$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Strange - you say State big government should get involved but >>>>>>>> not National government!
Which is more responsive to its residents?
In my state they're more responsive to outside special interest
groups backed by billionaires like the Kochs, like those who
crammed a school voucher with public funding program down their
throats on the threat of throwing a lot of money into campaigns to >>>>>> primary them.
Wow, public funding-- funds taken from the public
schools
Public schools don't generate funds, they consume funds... which
come from taxpayers.
and used to pay for
private
schooling. Is that a problem?
It is to a lot of people, there's only so much money to go around
especially in a state that ranks 45th in education spending.
Shouldn't they be spending those precious taxpayer moneys in the
best manner possible?
Sure rob poor Peter to pay rich Paul, the Republican credo....
Yet it's the pinkies who want high school grads to pay off the student
loans of college grads.
... Most of those parents with kids in private schools are already well off.
It's the parents of kids in crappy government schools who beg for vouchers.
If you want to send your kids to a private school or homeschool
yourself do it on your own dime.
How about the government letting me keep the portion of my taxes
that are spent on government schools so I can fund a better choice?
[crickets]
Aren't you pro-choice?
<laugh> Suddenly the right-wing is "pro-choice" when it comes to
vouchers.
<laugh> Suddenly the left-wing isn't "pro-choice" when it comes to vouchers.
Don't you want your kids to have the best education available?
I want everyone's kids to have the best education available, not just
my own.
So you're a socialist-- you care less for your own kids than for others'.
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >news:b63h0jdiv9l8vjgojjk8s06dcn93hk8sh1@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 14:47:00 -0000 (UTC), Baxterbe.
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>news:6tff0jhrbovvuu187egshu48m8n8jf5r4f@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 02:33:07 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>news:ngnd0jlqiodntsplp6ou15pl36s5hpenja@4ax.com:
I believe you are wrong. I believe the vast majority of US citizens >>>>>You live in an echo chamber.
want to make America great again
"Great again"? When was it great for blacks? For women? For LGBTQ?
Great for everyone when Trump was Presodent.
and the fact that only a small
minority of people think that the country is headed in the right
direction backs that up.
Women, for one, certainly think it's going in the wrong direction.
Biden leads a little with all women, but not as much as it used to
Yet somehow tRump has NEVER actually won an election.
<EYEROLL>
Yeah, MAGA cultists think tRump won the popular vote.
On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 02:47:37 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:citizens
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>news:b63h0jdiv9l8vjgojjk8s06dcn93hk8sh1@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 14:47:00 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>news:6tff0jhrbovvuu187egshu48m8n8jf5r4f@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 02:33:07 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>news:ngnd0jlqiodntsplp6ou15pl36s5hpenja@4ax.com:
I believe you are wrong. I believe the vast majority of US
LGBTQ?
You live in an echo chamber.
want to make America great again
"Great again"? When was it great for blacks? For women? For
be.
Great for everyone when Trump was Presodent.
and the fact that only a small
minority of people think that the country is headed in the right >>>>>>> direction backs that up.
Women, for one, certainly think it's going in the wrong direction.
Biden leads a little with all women, but not as much as it used to
Yet somehow tRump has NEVER actually won an election.
<EYEROLL>
Yeah, MAGA cultists think tRump won the popular vote.
Amost everyone knows that he won the 2016 election. Those that believe otherwise are morons.
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in news:f0bi0j9qsiuu969l46go3js2ao12jhu5o6@4ax.com:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 02:47:37 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
citizensBlue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>news:b63h0jdiv9l8vjgojjk8s06dcn93hk8sh1@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 14:47:00 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>news:6tff0jhrbovvuu187egshu48m8n8jf5r4f@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 02:33:07 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>news:ngnd0jlqiodntsplp6ou15pl36s5hpenja@4ax.com:
I believe you are wrong. I believe the vast majority of US
LGBTQ?
You live in an echo chamber.
want to make America great again
"Great again"? When was it great for blacks? For women? For
Great for everyone when Trump was Presodent.
Biden leads a little with all women, but not as much as it used to >>be.and the fact that only a small
minority of people think that the country is headed in the right >>>>>>> direction backs that up.
Women, for one, certainly think it's going in the wrong direction. >>>>>
Yet somehow tRump has NEVER actually won an election.
<EYEROLL>
Yeah, MAGA cultists think tRump won the popular vote.
Amost everyone knows that he won the 2016 election. Those that believe otherwise are morons.
He did not win the popular vote in 2016. He got the Electoral College -
NOT the Popular vote
==========
Hillary Clinton (Democrat, Women's Equality, Working Families) 65,853,514 48.18%
Donald J. Trump (Republican, American Independent, Conservative)
62,984,828 46.09%
https://www.fec.gov/resources/cms-
content/documents/federalelections2016.pdf
In article <uuc0as$1s66l$2@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:f0bi0j9qsiuu969l46go3js2ao12jhu5o6@4ax.com:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 02:47:37 -0000 (UTC), Baxtercitizens
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:b63h0jdiv9l8vjgojjk8s06dcn93hk8sh1@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 14:47:00 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:6tff0jhrbovvuu187egshu48m8n8jf5r4f@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 02:33:07 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>>> news:ngnd0jlqiodntsplp6ou15pl36s5hpenja@4ax.com:
I believe you are wrong. I believe the vast majority of US
LGBTQ?
You live in an echo chamber.
want to make America great again
"Great again"? When was it great for blacks? For women? For
be.
Great for everyone when Trump was Presodent.
Biden leads a little with all women, but not as much as it used toand the fact that only a small
minority of people think that the country is headed in the right >>>>>>>>> direction backs that up.
Women, for one, certainly think it's going in the wrong direction. >>>>>>>
Yet somehow tRump has NEVER actually won an election.
<EYEROLL>
Yeah, MAGA cultists think tRump won the popular vote.
Amost everyone knows that he won the 2016 election. Those that believe
otherwise are morons.
He did not win the popular vote in 2016. He got the Electoral College -
NOT the Popular vote
==========
Hillary Clinton (Democrat, Women's Equality, Working Families) 65,853,514
48.18%
Donald J. Trump (Republican, American Independent, Conservative)
62,984,828 46.09%
https://www.fec.gov/resources/cms-
content/documents/federalelections2016.pdf
He won
On 2024-03-30 14:49:27 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu559s$3toku$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-28 14:21:31 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu30t4$3d7la$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-28 04:22:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu285g$348lv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-27 18:39:17 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu1c4j$2t8t5$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Strange - you say State big government should get involved but >>>>>>>>> not National government!
Which is more responsive to its residents?
In my state they're more responsive to outside special interest
groups backed by billionaires like the Kochs, like those who
crammed a school voucher with public funding program down their
throats on the threat of throwing a lot of money into campaigns
to primary them.
Wow, public funding-- funds taken from the public
schools
Public schools don't generate funds, they consume funds... which
come from taxpayers.
and used to pay for
private
schooling. Is that a problem?
It is to a lot of people, there's only so much money to go around
especially in a state that ranks 45th in education spending.
Shouldn't they be spending those precious taxpayer moneys in the
best manner possible?
Sure rob poor Peter to pay rich Paul, the Republican credo....
Yet it's the pinkies who want high school grads to pay off the
student loans of college grads.
... Most of those parents with kids in private schools are already
well off.
It's the parents of kids in crappy government schools who beg for
vouchers.
If you want to send your kids to a private school or homeschool
yourself do it on your own dime.
How about the government letting me keep the portion of my taxes
that are spent on government schools so I can fund a better choice?
[crickets]
If everyone wanted to "keep their portion of their taxes" and spend it
on "better choices" there wouldn't be any highways or police or fire departments or anything else it takes to live in a civilized society.
Also there's no accountability how that public tax money is spent....
... It could be spent on a trip to Vegas or expensive jewelry ...
...instead of your kid's education for all anyone knows (and it probably is).
Is that clear enough for you to understand, Jiminy Cricket?
Aren't you pro-choice?
<laugh> Suddenly the right-wing is "pro-choice" when it comes to
vouchers.
<laugh> Suddenly the left-wing isn't "pro-choice" when it comes to
vouchers.
You have all the "choice" you want to send your kids to private
schools or homeschool them -- just do it on your own dime and not to
the detriment of public schools.
Don't you want your kids to have the best education available?
I want everyone's kids to have the best education available, not
just my own.
So you're a socialist-- you care less for your own kids than for
others'.
And you're a typical self-centered wingnut who has no problem letting billionaires like the Kochs shove their personal ideology down your
throat just because they have the big bucks to do it. And threaten
lawmakers with their jobs if they don't acquiesce.
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in news:f0bi0j9qsiuu969l46go3js2ao12jhu5o6@4ax.com:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 02:47:37 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:b63h0jdiv9l8vjgojjk8s06dcn93hk8sh1@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 14:47:00 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:6tff0jhrbovvuu187egshu48m8n8jf5r4f@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 02:33:07 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>> news:ngnd0jlqiodntsplp6ou15pl36s5hpenja@4ax.com:
I believe you are wrong. I believe the vast majority of US
citizens
You live in an echo chamber.
want to make America great again
"Great again"? When was it great for blacks? For women? For
LGBTQ?
Great for everyone when Trump was Presodent.
and the fact that only a small minority of people think that the >>>>>>>> country is headed in the right direction backs that up.
Women, for one, certainly think it's going in the wrong
direction.
Biden leads a little with all women, but not as much as it used
to be.
Yet somehow tRump has NEVER actually won an election.
<EYEROLL>
Yeah, MAGA cultists think tRump won the popular vote.
Amost everyone knows that he won the 2016 election. Those that
believe otherwise are morons.
He did not win the popular vote in 2016. He got the Electoral
College - NOT the Popular vote
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >news:f0bi0j9qsiuu969l46go3js2ao12jhu5o6@4ax.com:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 02:47:37 -0000 (UTC), Baxtercitizens
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>news:b63h0jdiv9l8vjgojjk8s06dcn93hk8sh1@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 14:47:00 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>news:6tff0jhrbovvuu187egshu48m8n8jf5r4f@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 02:33:07 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>>news:ngnd0jlqiodntsplp6ou15pl36s5hpenja@4ax.com:
I believe you are wrong. I believe the vast majority of US
LGBTQ?
You live in an echo chamber.
want to make America great again
"Great again"? When was it great for blacks? For women? For
Great for everyone when Trump was Presodent.
Biden leads a little with all women, but not as much as it used to >>>be.and the fact that only a small
minority of people think that the country is headed in the right >>>>>>>> direction backs that up.
Women, for one, certainly think it's going in the wrong direction. >>>>>>
Yet somehow tRump has NEVER actually won an election.
<EYEROLL>
Yeah, MAGA cultists think tRump won the popular vote.
Amost everyone knows that he won the 2016 election. Those that believe
otherwise are morons.
He did not win the popular vote in 2016. He got the Electoral College -
NOT the Popular vote
Hillary Clinton (Democrat, Women's Equality, Working Families) 65,853,514 >48.18%
Donald J. Trump (Republican, American Independent, Conservative)
62,984,828 46.09%
https://www.fec.gov/resources/cms-
content/documents/federalelections2016.pdf
In article <uuc0as$1s66l$2@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:f0bi0j9qsiuu969l46go3js2ao12jhu5o6@4ax.com:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 02:47:37 -0000 (UTC), Baxtercitizens
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:b63h0jdiv9l8vjgojjk8s06dcn93hk8sh1@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 14:47:00 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:6tff0jhrbovvuu187egshu48m8n8jf5r4f@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 02:33:07 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote
in news:ngnd0jlqiodntsplp6ou15pl36s5hpenja@4ax.com:
I believe you are wrong. I believe the vast majority of US
LGBTQ?
You live in an echo chamber.
want to make America great again
"Great again"? When was it great for blacks? For women? For
be.
Great for everyone when Trump was Presodent.
and the fact that only a small
minority of people think that the country is headed in the
right direction backs that up.
Women, for one, certainly think it's going in the wrong
direction.
Biden leads a little with all women, but not as much as it used
to
Yet somehow tRump has NEVER actually won an election.
<EYEROLL>
Yeah, MAGA cultists think tRump won the popular vote.
Amost everyone knows that he won the 2016 election. Those that
believe otherwise are morons.
He did not win the popular vote in 2016. He got the Electoral
College - NOT the Popular vote
==========
Hillary Clinton (Democrat, Women's Equality, Working Families)
65,853,514 48.18%
Donald J. Trump (Republican, American Independent, Conservative)
62,984,828 46.09%
https://www.fec.gov/resources/cms-
content/documents/federalelections2016.pdf
He won without cheating.
In news:uuc0as$1s66l$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:f0bi0j9qsiuu969l46go3js2ao12jhu5o6@4ax.com:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 02:47:37 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:b63h0jdiv9l8vjgojjk8s06dcn93hk8sh1@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 14:47:00 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:6tff0jhrbovvuu187egshu48m8n8jf5r4f@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 02:33:07 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote
in news:ngnd0jlqiodntsplp6ou15pl36s5hpenja@4ax.com:
I believe you are wrong. I believe the vast majority of US
citizens
You live in an echo chamber.
want to make America great again
"Great again"? When was it great for blacks? For women? For
LGBTQ?
Great for everyone when Trump was Presodent.
and the fact that only a small minority of people think that >>>>>>>>> the country is headed in the right direction backs that up.
Women, for one, certainly think it's going in the wrong
direction.
Biden leads a little with all women, but not as much as it used
to be.
Yet somehow tRump has NEVER actually won an election.
<EYEROLL>
Yeah, MAGA cultists think tRump won the popular vote.
Amost everyone knows that he won the 2016 election. Those that
believe otherwise are morons.
He did not win the popular vote in 2016. He got the Electoral
College - NOT the Popular vote
And that's what counts.
On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 15:43:24 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>news:f0bi0j9qsiuu969l46go3js2ao12jhu5o6@4ax.com:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 02:47:37 -0000 (UTC), Baxtercitizens
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>news:b63h0jdiv9l8vjgojjk8s06dcn93hk8sh1@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 14:47:00 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>news:6tff0jhrbovvuu187egshu48m8n8jf5r4f@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 02:33:07 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>>>news:ngnd0jlqiodntsplp6ou15pl36s5hpenja@4ax.com:
I believe you are wrong. I believe the vast majority of US
LGBTQ?
You live in an echo chamber.
want to make America great again
"Great again"? When was it great for blacks? For women? For
be.
Great for everyone when Trump was Presodent.
and the fact that only a small
minority of people think that the country is headed in the
right direction backs that up.
Women, for one, certainly think it's going in the wrong >>>>>>>>direction.
Biden leads a little with all women, but not as much as it used
to
Yet somehow tRump has NEVER actually won an election.
<EYEROLL>
Yeah, MAGA cultists think tRump won the popular vote.
Amost everyone knows that he won the 2016 election. Those that
believe otherwise are morons.
He did not win the popular vote in 2016. He got the Electoral
College - NOT the Popular vote
<SNICKER> The popular vote isn't what counts, Dummy, in fact the
popular vote is totally insignificant.
In news:uuc0as$1s66l$2@dont-email.me, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in news:f0bi0j9qsiuu969l46go3js2ao12jhu5o6@4ax.com:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 02:47:37 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:b63h0jdiv9l8vjgojjk8s06dcn93hk8sh1@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 14:47:00 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:6tff0jhrbovvuu187egshu48m8n8jf5r4f@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 02:33:07 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>> news:ngnd0jlqiodntsplp6ou15pl36s5hpenja@4ax.com:
I believe you are wrong. I believe the vast majority of US
citizens
You live in an echo chamber.
want to make America great again
"Great again"? When was it great for blacks? For women? For
LGBTQ?
Great for everyone when Trump was Presodent.
and the fact that only a small minority of people think that the >>>>>>>> country is headed in the right direction backs that up.
Women, for one, certainly think it's going in the wrong
direction.
Biden leads a little with all women, but not as much as it used
to be.
Yet somehow tRump has NEVER actually won an election.
<EYEROLL>
Yeah, MAGA cultists think tRump won the popular vote.
Amost everyone knows that he won the 2016 election. Those that
believe otherwise are morons.
He did not win the popular vote in 2016. He got the Electoral
College - NOT the Popular vote
And that's what counts.
"max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in news:uuc7vu$1u4b4$3@dont-email.me:
In news:uuc0as$1s66l$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:f0bi0j9qsiuu969l46go3js2ao12jhu5o6@4ax.com:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 02:47:37 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:b63h0jdiv9l8vjgojjk8s06dcn93hk8sh1@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 14:47:00 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>> news:6tff0jhrbovvuu187egshu48m8n8jf5r4f@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 02:33:07 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote >>>>>>>> in news:ngnd0jlqiodntsplp6ou15pl36s5hpenja@4ax.com:
I believe you are wrong. I believe the vast majority of US >>>>>>>>> citizens
You live in an echo chamber.
want to make America great again
"Great again"? When was it great for blacks? For women? For >>>>>>>> LGBTQ?
Great for everyone when Trump was Presodent.
and the fact that only a small minority of people think that >>>>>>>>> the country is headed in the right direction backs that up.
Women, for one, certainly think it's going in the wrong
direction.
Biden leads a little with all women, but not as much as it used >>>>>>> to be.
Yet somehow tRump has NEVER actually won an election.
<EYEROLL>
Yeah, MAGA cultists think tRump won the popular vote.
Amost everyone knows that he won the 2016 election. Those that
believe otherwise are morons.
He did not win the popular vote in 2016. He got the Electoral
College - NOT the Popular vote
And that's what counts.
Conservaturds keep claiming they are in the majority but the facts say otherwise.
"max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in news:uuc7vu$1u4b4$3@dont-email.me:
In news:uuc0as$1s66l$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:f0bi0j9qsiuu969l46go3js2ao12jhu5o6@4ax.com:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 02:47:37 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Yeah, MAGA cultists think tRump won the popular vote.
Amost everyone knows that he won the 2016 election. Those that
believe otherwise are morons.
He did not win the popular vote in 2016. He got the Electoral
College - NOT the Popular vote
And that's what counts.
maybe, but the fact remains that tRump lost the popular vote.
"max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in news:uuc7vu$1u4b4$3@dont-email.me:
In news:uuc0as$1s66l$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:f0bi0j9qsiuu969l46go3js2ao12jhu5o6@4ax.com:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 02:47:37 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:b63h0jdiv9l8vjgojjk8s06dcn93hk8sh1@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 14:47:00 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>> news:6tff0jhrbovvuu187egshu48m8n8jf5r4f@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 02:33:07 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote >>>>>>>> in news:ngnd0jlqiodntsplp6ou15pl36s5hpenja@4ax.com:
I believe you are wrong. I believe the vast majority of US >>>>>>>>> citizens
You live in an echo chamber.
want to make America great again
"Great again"? When was it great for blacks? For women? For >>>>>>>> LGBTQ?
Great for everyone when Trump was Presodent.
and the fact that only a small minority of people think that >>>>>>>>> the country is headed in the right direction backs that up.
Women, for one, certainly think it's going in the wrong
direction.
Biden leads a little with all women, but not as much as it used >>>>>>> to be.
Yet somehow tRump has NEVER actually won an election.
<EYEROLL>
Yeah, MAGA cultists think tRump won the popular vote.
Amost everyone knows that he won the 2016 election. Those that
believe otherwise are morons.
He did not win the popular vote in 2016. He got the Electoral
College - NOT the Popular vote
And that's what counts.
maybe, but the fact remains that tRump lost the popular vote.
On 3/31/2024 12:16 PM, On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried ? and
*failed* ? to bullshit:
In news:uucach$1uljv$3@dont-email.me, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried ? and *failed* ? to bullshit:
In news:uuc0as$1s66l$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:f0bi0j9qsiuu969l46go3js2ao12jhu5o6@4ax.com:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 02:47:37 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Yeah, MAGA cultists think tRump won the popular vote.
Amost everyone knows that he won the 2016 election. Those that
believe otherwise are morons.
He did not win the popular vote in 2016. He got the Electoral
College - NOT the Popular vote
And that's what counts.
maybe, but the fact remains that tRump lost the popular vote.
According to the Constitution, you have no say in the selection of a president.
This is a bad and wrong system inflicted on us by the slaveowners. The electoral
college was first and foremost implemented to protect slavery.
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in news:h6aj0jt79lu66hn03bkqeb65uvvse3k3oc@4ax.com:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 15:43:24 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>news:f0bi0j9qsiuu969l46go3js2ao12jhu5o6@4ax.com:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 02:47:37 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>news:b63h0jdiv9l8vjgojjk8s06dcn93hk8sh1@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 14:47:00 -0000 (UTC), Baxterbe.
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>news:6tff0jhrbovvuu187egshu48m8n8jf5r4f@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 02:33:07 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>>>news:ngnd0jlqiodntsplp6ou15pl36s5hpenja@4ax.com:
I believe you are wrong. I believe the vast majority of US >>citizens
You live in an echo chamber.
want to make America great again
"Great again"? When was it great for blacks? For women? For >>LGBTQ?
Great for everyone when Trump was Presodent.
and the fact that only a small
minority of people think that the country is headed in the >>>>>>>>> right direction backs that up.
Women, for one, certainly think it's going in the wrong >>>>>>>>direction.
Biden leads a little with all women, but not as much as it used >>>>>>> to
Yet somehow tRump has NEVER actually won an election.
<EYEROLL>
Yeah, MAGA cultists think tRump won the popular vote.
Amost everyone knows that he won the 2016 election. Those that
believe otherwise are morons.
He did not win the popular vote in 2016. He got the Electoral
College - NOT the Popular vote
<SNICKER> The popular vote isn't what counts, Dummy, in fact the
popular vote is totally insignificant.
Well, it wasn't "totally insignificant" in 2020. And the fact remains
that tRump has NEVER, ever won the popular vote.
In article <jSiON.499598$vFZa.449577@fx13.iad>, "because_\\shitbag \\_was_taken"@gmail.com says...
On 3/31/2024 12:16 PM, On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth
waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried ? and
*failed* ? to bullshit:
In news:uucach$1uljv$3@dont-email.me, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> >>> typed:
On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried ? and *failed* ? to bullshit:
In news:uuc0as$1s66l$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:f0bi0j9qsiuu969l46go3js2ao12jhu5o6@4ax.com:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 02:47:37 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Yeah, MAGA cultists think tRump won the popular vote.
Amost everyone knows that he won the 2016 election. Those that
believe otherwise are morons.
He did not win the popular vote in 2016. He got the Electoral
College - NOT the Popular vote
And that's what counts.
maybe, but the fact remains that tRump lost the popular vote.
According to the Constitution, you have no say in the selection of a president.
This is a bad and wrong system inflicted on us by the slaveowners. The electoral
college was first and foremost implemented to protect slavery.
He still won.
In article <uucach$1uljv$3@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
"max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in
news:uuc7vu$1u4b4$3@dont-email.me:
In news:uuc0as$1s66l$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:f0bi0j9qsiuu969l46go3js2ao12jhu5o6@4ax.com:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 02:47:37 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:b63h0jdiv9l8vjgojjk8s06dcn93hk8sh1@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 14:47:00 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>>> news:6tff0jhrbovvuu187egshu48m8n8jf5r4f@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 02:33:07 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote >>>>>>>>>> in news:ngnd0jlqiodntsplp6ou15pl36s5hpenja@4ax.com:
I believe you are wrong. I believe the vast majority of US >>>>>>>>>>> citizens
You live in an echo chamber.
want to make America great again
"Great again"? When was it great for blacks? For women? For >>>>>>>>>> LGBTQ?
Great for everyone when Trump was Presodent.
and the fact that only a small minority of people think that >>>>>>>>>>> the country is headed in the right direction backs that up.
Women, for one, certainly think it's going in the wrong
direction.
Biden leads a little with all women, but not as much as it used >>>>>>>>> to be.
Yet somehow tRump has NEVER actually won an election.
<EYEROLL>
Yeah, MAGA cultists think tRump won the popular vote.
Amost everyone knows that he won the 2016 election. Those that
believe otherwise are morons.
He did not win the popular vote in 2016. He got the Electoral
College - NOT the Popular vote
And that's what counts.
maybe, but the fact remains that tRump lost the popular vote.
He won and was president.
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:660993c5$3$1258322$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <uuc0as$1s66l$2@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:f0bi0j9qsiuu969l46go3js2ao12jhu5o6@4ax.com:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 02:47:37 -0000 (UTC), Baxtercitizens
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:b63h0jdiv9l8vjgojjk8s06dcn93hk8sh1@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 14:47:00 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:6tff0jhrbovvuu187egshu48m8n8jf5r4f@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 02:33:07 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote
in news:ngnd0jlqiodntsplp6ou15pl36s5hpenja@4ax.com:
I believe you are wrong. I believe the vast majority of US
LGBTQ?
You live in an echo chamber.
want to make America great again
"Great again"? When was it great for blacks? For women? For
be.
Great for everyone when Trump was Presodent.
and the fact that only a small
minority of people think that the country is headed in the
right direction backs that up.
Women, for one, certainly think it's going in the wrong
direction.
Biden leads a little with all women, but not as much as it used
to
Yet somehow tRump has NEVER actually won an election.
<EYEROLL>
Yeah, MAGA cultists think tRump won the popular vote.
Amost everyone knows that he won the 2016 election. Those that
believe otherwise are morons.
He did not win the popular vote in 2016. He got the Electoral
College - NOT the Popular vote
==========
Hillary Clinton (Democrat, Women's Equality, Working Families)
65,853,514 48.18%
Donald J. Trump (Republican, American Independent, Conservative)
62,984,828 46.09%
https://www.fec.gov/resources/cms-
content/documents/federalelections2016.pdf
He won without cheating.
Did I say anything about cheating?
In article <uucach$1uljv$3@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
"max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in
news:uuc7vu$1u4b4$3@dont-email.me:
In news:uuc0as$1s66l$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:f0bi0j9qsiuu969l46go3js2ao12jhu5o6@4ax.com:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 02:47:37 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:b63h0jdiv9l8vjgojjk8s06dcn93hk8sh1@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 14:47:00 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>>> news:6tff0jhrbovvuu187egshu48m8n8jf5r4f@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 02:33:07 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote >>>>>>>>>> in news:ngnd0jlqiodntsplp6ou15pl36s5hpenja@4ax.com:
I believe you are wrong. I believe the vast majority of US >>>>>>>>>>> citizens
You live in an echo chamber.
want to make America great again
"Great again"? When was it great for blacks? For women? For >>>>>>>>>> LGBTQ?
Great for everyone when Trump was Presodent.
and the fact that only a small minority of people think that >>>>>>>>>>> the country is headed in the right direction backs that up.
Women, for one, certainly think it's going in the wrong
direction.
Biden leads a little with all women, but not as much as it used >>>>>>>>> to be.
Yet somehow tRump has NEVER actually won an election.
<EYEROLL>
Yeah, MAGA cultists think tRump won the popular vote.
Amost everyone knows that he won the 2016 election. Those that
believe otherwise are morons.
He did not win the popular vote in 2016. He got the Electoral
College - NOT the Popular vote
And that's what counts.
maybe, but the fact remains that tRump lost the popular vote.
He won
In news:uuapfj$1gufv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-30 14:49:27 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu559s$3toku$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-28 14:21:31 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu30t4$3d7la$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-28 04:22:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu285g$348lv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-27 18:39:17 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu1c4j$2t8t5$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Strange - you say State big government should get involved but >>>>>>>>>> not National government!
Which is more responsive to its residents?
In my state they're more responsive to outside special interest >>>>>>>> groups backed by billionaires like the Kochs, like those who
crammed a school voucher with public funding program down their >>>>>>>> throats on the threat of throwing a lot of money into campaigns >>>>>>>> to primary them.
Wow, public funding-- funds taken from the public
schools
Public schools don't generate funds, they consume funds... which
come from taxpayers.
and used to pay for
private
schooling. Is that a problem?
It is to a lot of people, there's only so much money to go around
especially in a state that ranks 45th in education spending.
Shouldn't they be spending those precious taxpayer moneys in the
best manner possible?
Sure rob poor Peter to pay rich Paul, the Republican credo....
If everyone wanted to "keep their portion of their taxes" and spend it
on "better choices" there wouldn't be any highways or police or fire
departments or anything else it takes to live in a civilized society.
There aren't alternatives to government roads or fire departments;
there *are* alternatives to government schools.
Also there's no accountability how that public tax money is spent....
That's the point-- government schools are inferior to the private sector.
... It could be spent on a trip to Vegas or expensive jewelry ...
Like Fani Willis?
...instead of your kid's education for all anyone knows (and it probably is).
Parent are still responsible for educating their kids.
Is that clear enough for you to understand, Jiminy Cricket?
Yup. You're a statist.
Aren't you pro-choice?
<laugh> Suddenly the right-wing is "pro-choice" when it comes to
vouchers.
<laugh> Suddenly the left-wing isn't "pro-choice" when it comes to
vouchers.
You have all the "choice" you want to send your kids to private
schools or homeschool them -- just do it on your own dime and not to
the detriment of public schools.
I did... but what about the working families whose kids attend crappy
schools because vouchers are unavailable?
Don't you want your kids to have the best education available?
I want everyone's kids to have the best education available, not
just my own.
So you're a socialist-- you care less for your own kids than for
others'.
And you're a typical self-centered wingnut who has no problem letting
billionaires like the Kochs shove their personal ideology down your
throat just because they have the big bucks to do it. And threaten
lawmakers with their jobs if they don't acquiesce.
And you're a typical self-centered wingnut who has no problem letting billionaires like Soros
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >news:h6aj0jt79lu66hn03bkqeb65uvvse3k3oc@4ax.com:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 15:43:24 -0000 (UTC), BaxterWell, it wasn't "totally insignificant" in 2020.
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>news:f0bi0j9qsiuu969l46go3js2ao12jhu5o6@4ax.com:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 02:47:37 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>news:b63h0jdiv9l8vjgojjk8s06dcn93hk8sh1@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 14:47:00 -0000 (UTC), Baxterbe.
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>>news:6tff0jhrbovvuu187egshu48m8n8jf5r4f@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 02:33:07 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>>>>news:ngnd0jlqiodntsplp6ou15pl36s5hpenja@4ax.com:
I believe you are wrong. I believe the vast majority of US >>>citizens
You live in an echo chamber.
want to make America great again
"Great again"? When was it great for blacks? For women? For >>>LGBTQ?
Great for everyone when Trump was Presodent.
and the fact that only a small
minority of people think that the country is headed in the >>>>>>>>>> right direction backs that up.
Women, for one, certainly think it's going in the wrong >>>>>>>>>direction.
Biden leads a little with all women, but not as much as it used >>>>>>>> to
Yet somehow tRump has NEVER actually won an election.
<EYEROLL>
Yeah, MAGA cultists think tRump won the popular vote.
Amost everyone knows that he won the 2016 election. Those that
believe otherwise are morons.
He did not win the popular vote in 2016. He got the Electoral
College - NOT the Popular vote
<SNICKER> The popular vote isn't what counts, Dummy, in fact the
popular vote is totally insignificant.
And the fact remains
that tRump has NEVER, ever won the popular vote.
In article <jSiON.499598$vFZa.449577@fx13.iad>, "because_\\shitbag \\_was_taken"@gmail.com says...
On 3/31/2024 12:16 PM, On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth
waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried ? and
*failed* ? to bullshit:
In news:uucach$1uljv$3@dont-email.me, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> >>> typed:
On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried ? and *failed* ? to bullshit:
In news:uuc0as$1s66l$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:f0bi0j9qsiuu969l46go3js2ao12jhu5o6@4ax.com:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 02:47:37 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Yeah, MAGA cultists think tRump won the popular vote.
Amost everyone knows that he won the 2016 election. Those that
believe otherwise are morons.
He did not win the popular vote in 2016. He got the Electoral
College - NOT the Popular vote
And that's what counts.
maybe, but the fact remains that tRump lost the popular vote.
According to the Constitution, you have no say in the selection of a president.
This is a bad and wrong system inflicted on us by the slaveowners. The electoral
college was first and foremost implemented to protect slavery.
He still won.
On 2024-03-31 16:56:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uuapfj$1gufv$1@dont-email.me, super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-30 14:49:27 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu559s$3toku$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-28 14:21:31 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu30t4$3d7la$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-28 04:22:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu285g$348lv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-27 18:39:17 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu1c4j$2t8t5$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Strange - you say State big government should get involved but >>>>>>>>>>> not National government!
Which is more responsive to its residents?
In my state they're more responsive to outside special interest >>>>>>>>> groups backed by billionaires like the Kochs, like those who >>>>>>>>> crammed a school voucher with public funding program down their >>>>>>>>> throats on the threat of throwing a lot of money into campaigns >>>>>>>>> to primary them.
Wow, public funding-- funds taken from the public
schools
Public schools don't generate funds, they consume funds... which
come from taxpayers.
and used to pay for
private
schooling. Is that a problem?
It is to a lot of people, there's only so much money to go around >>>>>>> especially in a state that ranks 45th in education spending.
Shouldn't they be spending those precious taxpayer moneys in the
best manner possible?
Sure rob poor Peter to pay rich Paul, the Republican credo....
If everyone wanted to "keep their portion of their taxes" and spend it
on "better choices" there wouldn't be any highways or police or fire
departments or anything else it takes to live in a civilized society.
There aren't alternatives to government roads or fire departments; there *are*
alternatives to government schools.
Still doesn't give you the right to take money intended for public schools away.
Also there's no accountability how that public tax money is spent....
That's the point-- government schools are inferior to the private sector.
I was talking about the $7K or whatever amount it is they're doling out to the
private/homeschoolers, dweeb.
... It could be spent on a trip to Vegas or expensive jewelry ...
Like Fani Willis?
? Try to stay on topic, silly goose.
...instead of your kid's education for all anyone knows (and it probably is).
Parent are still responsible for educating their kids.
Is that clear enough for you to understand, Jiminy Cricket?
Yup. You're a statist.
And you're a fascist with no concern for the greater society.
Aren't you pro-choice?
<laugh> Suddenly the right-wing is "pro-choice" when it comes to
vouchers.
<laugh> Suddenly the left-wing isn't "pro-choice" when it comes to
vouchers.
You have all the "choice" you want to send your kids to private
schools or homeschool them -- just do it on your own dime and not to
the detriment of public schools.
I did... but what about the working families whose kids attend crappy schools
because vouchers are unavailable?
What about upper middle class families who get vouchers when they can easily afford to pay for a private education themselves?
On 3/31/2024 2:08 PM, super70s wrote:
On 2024-03-31 16:56:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uuapfj$1gufv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-30 14:49:27 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu559s$3toku$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-28 14:21:31 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu30t4$3d7la$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-28 04:22:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu285g$348lv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-27 18:39:17 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu1c4j$2t8t5$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Strange - you say State big government should get involved but >>>>>>>>>>>> not National government!
Which is more responsive to its residents?
In my state they're more responsive to outside special interest >>>>>>>>>> groups backed by billionaires like the Kochs, like those who >>>>>>>>>> crammed a school voucher with public funding program down their >>>>>>>>>> throats on the threat of throwing a lot of money into campaigns >>>>>>>>>> to primary them.
Wow, public funding-- funds taken from the public
schools
Public schools don't generate funds, they consume funds... which >>>>>>> come from taxpayers.
and used to pay for
private
schooling. Is that a problem?
It is to a lot of people, there's only so much money to go around >>>>>>>> especially in a state that ranks 45th in education spending.
Shouldn't they be spending those precious taxpayer moneys in the >>>>>>> best manner possible?
Sure rob poor Peter to pay rich Paul, the Republican credo....
If everyone wanted to "keep their portion of their taxes" and spend it >>>> on "better choices" there wouldn't be any highways or police or fire
departments or anything else it takes to live in a civilized society.
There aren't alternatives to government roads or fire departments;
there *are* alternatives to government schools.
Still doesn't give you the right to take money intended for public
schools away.
I was talking about the $7K or whatever amount it is they're doling outAlso there's no accountability how that public tax money is spent....
That's the point-- government schools are inferior to the private sector. >>
to the private/homeschoolers, dweeb.
... It could be spent on a trip to Vegas or expensive jewelry ...
Like Fani Willis?
? Try to stay on topic, silly goose.
...instead of your kid's education for all anyone knows (and it probably is).
Parent are still responsible for educating their kids.
Is that clear enough for you to understand, Jiminy Cricket?
Yup. You're a statist.
And you're a fascist with no concern for the greater society.
Not wanting the state to be in the business of owning and operating
schools does not make one a fascist and is not a fascist position. In
fact, fascists probably *want* the government to own and operate
schools, so they can ensure the fascist indoctrination.
Modern states typically give financial assistance to lower income
families for food, housing and medical care, but we don't force them to
buy groceries in government commissaries; don't force them to live in government barracks and dormitories; and don't force them to obtain
medical care from government clinics. We give them vouchers or
electronic benefit cards and let them buy the things they want from the suppliers they choose. School instruction should be no different.
Aren't you pro-choice?
<laugh> Suddenly the right-wing is "pro-choice" when it comes to
vouchers.
<laugh> Suddenly the left-wing isn't "pro-choice" when it comes to
vouchers.
You have all the "choice" you want to send your kids to private
schools or homeschool them -- just do it on your own dime and not to
the detriment of public schools.
I did... but what about the working families whose kids attend crappy
schools because vouchers are unavailable?
What about upper middle class families who get vouchers when they can
easily afford to pay for a private education themselves?
School vouchers are means tested.
On 2024-03-31 16:56:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uuapfj$1gufv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-30 14:49:27 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu559s$3toku$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-28 14:21:31 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu30t4$3d7la$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-28 04:22:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu285g$348lv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-27 18:39:17 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu1c4j$2t8t5$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Strange - you say State big government should get involved >>>>>>>>>>> but not National government!
Which is more responsive to its residents?
In my state they're more responsive to outside special
interest groups backed by billionaires like the Kochs, like
those who crammed a school voucher with public funding
program down their throats on the threat of throwing a lot
of money into campaigns to primary them.
Wow, public funding-- funds taken from the public
schools
Public schools don't generate funds, they consume funds... which
come from taxpayers.
and used to pay for
private
schooling. Is that a problem?
It is to a lot of people, there's only so much money to go
around especially in a state that ranks 45th in education
spending.
Shouldn't they be spending those precious taxpayer moneys in the
best manner possible?
Sure rob poor Peter to pay rich Paul, the Republican credo....
Yet it's the pinkies who want high school grads to pay off the
student loans of college grads.
... Most of those parents with kids in private schools are
already well off.
It's the parents of kids in crappy government schools who beg for
vouchers.
If you want to send your kids to a private school or homeschool
yourself do it on your own dime.
How about the government letting me keep the portion of my taxes
that are spent on government schools so I can fund a better
choice?
If everyone wanted to "keep their portion of their taxes" and
spend it on "better choices" there wouldn't be any highways or
police or fire departments or anything else it takes to live in a
civilized society.
There aren't alternatives to government roads or fire departments;
there *are* alternatives to government schools.
Still doesn't give you the right to take money intended for public
schools away.
Also there's no accountability how that public tax money is
spent....
That's the point-- government schools are inferior to the private
sector.
I was talking about the $7K or whatever amount it is they're doling
out to the private/homeschoolers, dweeb.
... It could be spent on a trip to Vegas or expensive jewelry ...
Like Fani Willis?
? Try to stay on topic, silly goose.
...instead of your kid's education for all anyone knows (and it
probably is).
Parent are still responsible for educating their kids.
Is that clear enough for you to understand, Jiminy Cricket?
Yup. You're a statist.
And you're a fascist with no concern for the greater society.
Aren't you pro-choice?
<laugh> Suddenly the right-wing is "pro-choice" when it comes to
vouchers.
<laugh> Suddenly the left-wing isn't "pro-choice" when it comes to
vouchers.
You have all the "choice" you want to send your kids to private
schools or homeschool them -- just do it on your own dime and not
to the detriment of public schools.
I did... but what about the working families whose kids attend
crappy schools because vouchers are unavailable?
What about upper middle class families who get vouchers when they
can easily afford to pay for a private education themselves?
I thought you wingerdingers were against waste in goverment.
Don't you want your kids to have the best education available?
I want everyone's kids to have the best education available, not
just my own.
So you're a socialist-- you care less for your own kids than for
others'.
And you're a typical self-centered wingnut who has no problem
letting billionaires like the Kochs shove their personal ideology
down your throat just because they have the big bucks to do it.
And threaten lawmakers with their jobs if they don't acquiesce.
And you're a typical self-centered wingnut who has no problem
letting billionaires like Soros shove his personal ideology down
your throat just because he has the big bucks to do it, and
threaten lawmakers with their jobs if they don't acquiesce.
Show me an example of Soros giving money and then threatening
lawmakers if they don't abide by his wishes, asshole.
In article <uucaaq$1uljv$2@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...in
"max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in
news:uuc7vu$1u4b4$3@dont-email.me:
In news:uuc0as$1s66l$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:f0bi0j9qsiuu969l46go3js2ao12jhu5o6@4ax.com:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 02:47:37 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:b63h0jdiv9l8vjgojjk8s06dcn93hk8sh1@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 14:47:00 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote
usednews:6tff0jhrbovvuu187egshu48m8n8jf5r4f@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 02:33:07 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote
in news:ngnd0jlqiodntsplp6ou15pl36s5hpenja@4ax.com:
I believe you are wrong. I believe the vast majority of US
citizens
You live in an echo chamber.
want to make America great again
"Great again"? When was it great for blacks? For women? For
LGBTQ?
Great for everyone when Trump was Presodent.
and the fact that only a small minority of people think that
the country is headed in the right direction backs that up.
Women, for one, certainly think it's going in the wrong
direction.
Biden leads a little with all women, but not as much as it
to be.
Yet somehow tRump has NEVER actually won an election.
<EYEROLL>
Yeah, MAGA cultists think tRump won the popular vote.
Amost everyone knows that he won the 2016 election. Those that
believe otherwise are morons.
He did not win the popular vote in 2016. He got the Electoral
College - NOT the Popular vote
And that's what counts.
Conservaturds keep claiming they are in the majority but the facts say
otherwise.
The polls say they are ahead.
On 31 Mar 2024, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> posted some news:uucaaq$1uljv$2@dont-email.me:
Conservaturds keep claiming they are in the majority but the facts say
otherwise.
This kind of "Conservaturd"?
https://s.abcnews.com/images/US/2020march-washsqpark-gty-ps- 210528_1622207801081_hpMain.jpg
On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 18:36:37 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:in
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>news:h6aj0jt79lu66hn03bkqeb65uvvse3k3oc@4ax.com:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 15:43:24 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>news:f0bi0j9qsiuu969l46go3js2ao12jhu5o6@4ax.com:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 02:47:37 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>news:b63h0jdiv9l8vjgojjk8s06dcn93hk8sh1@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 14:47:00 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>>>news:6tff0jhrbovvuu187egshu48m8n8jf5r4f@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 02:33:07 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote
Well, it wasn't "totally insignificant" in 2020.be.news:ngnd0jlqiodntsplp6ou15pl36s5hpenja@4ax.com:
I believe you are wrong. I believe the vast majority of US >>>>citizens
You live in an echo chamber.
want to make America great again
"Great again"? When was it great for blacks? For women? For >>>>LGBTQ?
Great for everyone when Trump was Presodent.
and the fact that only a small
minority of people think that the country is headed in the >>>>>>>>>>> right direction backs that up.
Women, for one, certainly think it's going in the wrong >>>>>>>>>>direction.
Biden leads a little with all women, but not as much as it used >>>>>>>>> to
Yet somehow tRump has NEVER actually won an election.
<EYEROLL>
Yeah, MAGA cultists think tRump won the popular vote.
Amost everyone knows that he won the 2016 election. Those that
believe otherwise are morons.
He did not win the popular vote in 2016. He got the Electoral
College - NOT the Popular vote
<SNICKER> The popular vote isn't what counts, Dummy, in fact the
popular vote is totally insignificant.
It's totally insignifiant in every Presidential election.
And the fact remains
that tRump has NEVER, ever won the popular vote.
I'm pretty sure that was never his goal, at least not his primary
goal.
On 2024-03-31 23:23:53 +0000, Lou Bricano said:
On 3/31/2024 2:08 PM, super70s wrote:
On 2024-03-31 16:56:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uuapfj$1gufv$1@dont-email.me, super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> >>>> typed:
On 2024-03-30 14:49:27 +0000, max headroom said:There aren't alternatives to government roads or fire departments; there >>>> *are* alternatives to government schools.
In news:uu559s$3toku$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-28 14:21:31 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu30t4$3d7la$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-28 04:22:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu285g$348lv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-27 18:39:17 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu1c4j$2t8t5$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Strange - you say State big government should get involved but >>>>>>>>>>>>> not National government!
Which is more responsive to its residents?
In my state they're more responsive to outside special interest >>>>>>>>>>> groups backed by billionaires like the Kochs, like those who >>>>>>>>>>> crammed a school voucher with public funding program down their >>>>>>>>>>> throats on the threat of throwing a lot of money into campaigns >>>>>>>>>>> to primary them.
Wow, public funding-- funds taken from the public
schools
Public schools don't generate funds, they consume funds... which >>>>>>>> come from taxpayers.
and used to pay for
private
schooling. Is that a problem?
It is to a lot of people, there's only so much money to go around >>>>>>>>> especially in a state that ranks 45th in education spending.
Shouldn't they be spending those precious taxpayer moneys in the >>>>>>>> best manner possible?
Sure rob poor Peter to pay rich Paul, the Republican credo....
If everyone wanted to "keep their portion of their taxes" and spend it >>>>> on "better choices" there wouldn't be any highways or police or fire >>>>> departments or anything else it takes to live in a civilized society. >>>>
Still doesn't give you the right to take money intended for public schools away.
I was talking about the $7K or whatever amount it is they're doling out to >>> the private/homeschoolers, dweeb.Also there's no accountability how that public tax money is spent.... >>>>That's the point-- government schools are inferior to the private sector. >>>
... It could be spent on a trip to Vegas or expensive jewelry ...
Like Fani Willis?
? Try to stay on topic, silly goose.
...instead of your kid's education for all anyone knows (and it probably is).
Parent are still responsible for educating their kids.
Is that clear enough for you to understand, Jiminy Cricket?
Yup. You're a statist.
And you're a fascist with no concern for the greater society.
Not wanting the state to be in the business of owning and operating schools >> does not make one a fascist and is not a fascist position. In fact, fascists >> probably *want* the government to own and operate schools, so they can ensure
the fascist indoctrination.
Modern states typically give financial assistance to lower income families for
food, housing and medical care, but we don't force them to buy groceries in >> government commissaries; don't force them to live in government barracks and >> dormitories; and don't force them to obtain medical care from government
clinics. We give them vouchers or electronic benefit cards and let them buy >> the things they want from the suppliers they choose. School instruction should
be no different.
This voucher program I'm talking about and SNAP benefits are like apples and oranges, the latter doesn't take money away from a food assistance program already in existence.
Aren't you pro-choice?
<laugh> Suddenly the right-wing is "pro-choice" when it comes to >>>>>>> vouchers.
<laugh> Suddenly the left-wing isn't "pro-choice" when it comes to >>>>>> vouchers.
You have all the "choice" you want to send your kids to private
schools or homeschool them -- just do it on your own dime and not to >>>>> the detriment of public schools.
I did... but what about the working families whose kids attend crappy
schools because vouchers are unavailable?
What about upper middle class families who get vouchers when they can easily
afford to pay for a private education themselves?
School vouchers are means tested.
Not in my state.
On 3/31/2024 2:08 PM, super70s wrote:
On 2024-03-31 16:56:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uuapfj$1gufv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-30 14:49:27 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu559s$3toku$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-28 14:21:31 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu30t4$3d7la$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-28 04:22:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu285g$348lv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-27 18:39:17 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu1c4j$2t8t5$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Strange - you say State big government should get involved >>>>>>>>>>>> but not National government!
Which is more responsive to its residents?
In my state they're more responsive to outside special
interest groups backed by billionaires like the Kochs, like >>>>>>>>>> those who crammed a school voucher with public funding
program down their throats on the threat of throwing a lot of >>>>>>>>>> money into campaigns to primary them.
Wow, public funding-- funds taken from the public
schools
Public schools don't generate funds, they consume funds... which >>>>>>> come from taxpayers.
and used to pay for
private
schooling. Is that a problem?
It is to a lot of people, there's only so much money to go
around especially in a state that ranks 45th in education
spending.
Shouldn't they be spending those precious taxpayer moneys in the >>>>>>> best manner possible?
Sure rob poor Peter to pay rich Paul, the Republican credo....
If everyone wanted to "keep their portion of their taxes" and spend
it on "better choices" there wouldn't be any highways or police or
fire departments or anything else it takes to live in a civilized
society.
There aren't alternatives to government roads or fire departments;
there *are* alternatives to government schools.
Still doesn't give you the right to take money intended for public
schools away.
Also there's no accountability how that public tax money is
spent....
That's the point-- government schools are inferior to the private
sector.
I was talking about the $7K or whatever amount it is they're doling
out to the private/homeschoolers, dweeb.
... It could be spent on a trip to Vegas or expensive jewelry ...
Like Fani Willis?
? Try to stay on topic, silly goose.
...instead of your kid's education for all anyone knows (and it
probably is).
Parent are still responsible for educating their kids.
Is that clear enough for you to understand, Jiminy Cricket?
Yup. You're a statist.
And you're a fascist with no concern for the greater society.
Not wanting the state to be in the business of owning and operating
schools does not make one a fascist and is not a fascist position. In
fact, fascists probably *want* the government to own and operate
schools, so they can ensure the fascist indoctrination.
Modern states typically give financial assistance to lower income
families for food, housing and medical care, but we don't force them
to buy groceries in government commissaries; don't force them to live
in government barracks and dormitories; and don't force them to obtain medical care from government clinics. We give them vouchers or
electronic benefit cards and let them buy the things they want from
the suppliers they choose. School instruction should be no different.
Aren't you pro-choice?
<laugh> Suddenly the right-wing is "pro-choice" when it comes to
vouchers.
<laugh> Suddenly the left-wing isn't "pro-choice" when it comes to
vouchers.
You have all the "choice" you want to send your kids to private
schools or homeschool them -- just do it on your own dime and not
to the detriment of public schools.
I did... but what about the working families whose kids attend
crappy schools because vouchers are unavailable?
What about upper middle class families who get vouchers when they can
easily afford to pay for a private education themselves?
School vouchers are means tested.
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >news:c1mj0j5sjimic9jekf3vaivjgaltbdm39q@4ax.com:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 18:36:37 -0000 (UTC), Baxterin
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>news:h6aj0jt79lu66hn03bkqeb65uvvse3k3oc@4ax.com:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 15:43:24 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>news:f0bi0j9qsiuu969l46go3js2ao12jhu5o6@4ax.com:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 02:47:37 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>>news:b63h0jdiv9l8vjgojjk8s06dcn93hk8sh1@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 14:47:00 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>>>>news:6tff0jhrbovvuu187egshu48m8n8jf5r4f@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 02:33:07 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote
Well, it wasn't "totally insignificant" in 2020.be.news:ngnd0jlqiodntsplp6ou15pl36s5hpenja@4ax.com:
I believe you are wrong. I believe the vast majority of US >>>>>citizens
You live in an echo chamber.
want to make America great again
"Great again"? When was it great for blacks? For women? For >>>>>LGBTQ?
Great for everyone when Trump was Presodent.
and the fact that only a small
minority of people think that the country is headed in the >>>>>>>>>>>> right direction backs that up.
Women, for one, certainly think it's going in the wrong >>>>>>>>>>>direction.
Biden leads a little with all women, but not as much as it used >>>>>>>>>> to
Yet somehow tRump has NEVER actually won an election.
<EYEROLL>
Yeah, MAGA cultists think tRump won the popular vote.
Amost everyone knows that he won the 2016 election. Those that
believe otherwise are morons.
He did not win the popular vote in 2016. He got the Electoral >>>>>College - NOT the Popular vote
<SNICKER> The popular vote isn't what counts, Dummy, in fact the
popular vote is totally insignificant.
It's totally insignifiant in every Presidential election.
And the fact remains
that tRump has NEVER, ever won the popular vote.
I'm pretty sure that was never his goal, at least not his primary
goal.
Then you should own up to how he got "elected" and quit claiming you
MAGAts are in the majority.
Skeeter wrote:
More blacks and Hispanics are supporting Trump.
oh great, even more criminals
In article <uu7u3u$ol5i$2@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:6607248f$0$1643532$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <t0ENN.116886$_a1e.96613@fx16.iad>,
Iron_WhiteSupremacist@Systemic_Treason.KMA says...
He's saying that MAGA is a cult that makes America worse, scooter.
He's right.
He's saying he doesn't want to make America great. It sucks now and he
likes it that way.
The problam is the "again" part. For over half of the American
population,
it has NEVER BEEN GREAT - so they're looking forward - not back.
Did you talk to all of them?
On 2024-03-30 13:50:48 +0000, Scout said:
"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
news:660705ac$0$6335$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
In article <uu68s2$903c$2@dont-email.me>,
me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net says...
"super70s" <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote in message
news:uu559s$3toku$1@dont-email.me...
On 2024-03-28 14:21:31 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu30t4$3d7la$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid>
typed:
On 2024-03-28 04:22:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu285g$348lv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-27 18:39:17 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu1c4j$2t8t5$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Strange - you say State big government should get involved but >>>>>>>>>>> not
National government!
Which is more responsive to its residents?
In my state they're more responsive to outside special interest >>>>>>>>> groups backed by billionaires like the Kochs, like those who >>>>>>>>> crammed a school voucher with public funding program down their >>>>>>>>> throats on the threat of throwing a lot of money into campaigns to >>>>>>>>> primary them.
Wow, public funding-- funds taken from the public
schools
Public schools don't generate funds, they consume funds... which come >>>>>> from
taxpayers.
and used to pay for
private
schooling. Is that a problem?
It is to a lot of people, there's only so much money to go around >>>>>>> especially in a state that ranks 45th in education spending.
Shouldn't they be spending those precious taxpayer moneys in the best >>>>>> manner
possible?
Sure rob poor Peter to pay rich Paul, the Republican credo. Most of
those
parents with kids in private schools are already well off.
So you feel that how you are treated should depend on your level of
wealth
with poor people having more rights than rich people?
I am still trying to figure out what his argument is.
I'm sure he doesn't know either.
When you two finish your circle jerk here's a story that explains all
about it:
REVEALED: Secret recording shows pressure on Republican lawmakers to vote
for school vouchers
https://www.newschannel5.com/news/newschannel-5-investigates/revealed/revealed-secret-recording-shows-pressure-on-republican-lawmakers-to-vote-for-school-vouchers
Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote in news:uu8407$pv0q$1@dont- email.me:
On 3/29/2024 9:25 AM, Lou Bricano wrote:
You have fabricated your definition of "good law." You're equivocating
on the meaning of "good."
No, I have always used "good law" to describe binding precedent.
so following Dred Scott precedent is "good law"?!!
I'm sure you can find some precedent for ANY decision made.
Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote in news:uu9c7n$1301c$1@dont- email.me:
On 3/30/2024 7:44 AM, Baxter wrote:Bullshit! It was bad law and required the 13th to fix it.
Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote in news:uu8407$pv0q$1@dont-
email.me:
On 3/29/2024 9:25 AM, Lou Bricano wrote:
You have fabricated your definition of "good law." You're equivocating >>>>> on the meaning of "good."
No, I have always used "good law" to describe binding precedent.
so following Dred Scott precedent is "good law"?!!
It was good law (binding precedent) until the 13th Amendment. "Good law"
doesn't imply the decision was good.
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in news:b63h0jdiv9l8vjgojjk8s06dcn93hk8sh1@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 14:47:00 -0000 (UTC), Baxterbe.
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>news:6tff0jhrbovvuu187egshu48m8n8jf5r4f@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 02:33:07 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>news:ngnd0jlqiodntsplp6ou15pl36s5hpenja@4ax.com:
I believe you are wrong. I believe the vast majority of US citizens >>>>>You live in an echo chamber.
want to make America great again
"Great again"? When was it great for blacks? For women? For LGBTQ?
Great for everyone when Trump was Presodent.
and the fact that only a small
minority of people think that the country is headed in the right
direction backs that up.
Women, for one, certainly think it's going in the wrong direction.
Biden leads a little with all women, but not as much as it used to
Yet somehow tRump has NEVER actually won an election.
<EYEROLL>
Yeah, MAGA cultists think tRump won the popular vote.
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in news:f0bi0j9qsiuu969l46go3js2ao12jhu5o6@4ax.com:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 02:47:37 -0000 (UTC), Baxtercitizens
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>news:b63h0jdiv9l8vjgojjk8s06dcn93hk8sh1@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 14:47:00 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>news:6tff0jhrbovvuu187egshu48m8n8jf5r4f@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 02:33:07 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>>news:ngnd0jlqiodntsplp6ou15pl36s5hpenja@4ax.com:
I believe you are wrong. I believe the vast majority of US
LGBTQ?
You live in an echo chamber.
want to make America great again
"Great again"? When was it great for blacks? For women? For
Great for everyone when Trump was Presodent.
Biden leads a little with all women, but not as much as it used to >>>be.and the fact that only a small
minority of people think that the country is headed in the right >>>>>>>> direction backs that up.
Women, for one, certainly think it's going in the wrong direction. >>>>>>
Yet somehow tRump has NEVER actually won an election.
<EYEROLL>
Yeah, MAGA cultists think tRump won the popular vote.
Amost everyone knows that he won the 2016 election. Those that believe
otherwise are morons.
He did not win the popular vote in 2016. He got the Electoral College -
NOT the Popular vote
"max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in news:uuc7vu$1u4b4$3@dont-email.me:
In news:uuc0as$1s66l$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:f0bi0j9qsiuu969l46go3js2ao12jhu5o6@4ax.com:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 02:47:37 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:b63h0jdiv9l8vjgojjk8s06dcn93hk8sh1@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 14:47:00 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>> news:6tff0jhrbovvuu187egshu48m8n8jf5r4f@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 02:33:07 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote >>>>>>>>> in news:ngnd0jlqiodntsplp6ou15pl36s5hpenja@4ax.com:
I believe you are wrong. I believe the vast majority of US >>>>>>>>>> citizens
You live in an echo chamber.
want to make America great again
"Great again"? When was it great for blacks? For women? For >>>>>>>>> LGBTQ?
Great for everyone when Trump was Presodent.
and the fact that only a small minority of people think that >>>>>>>>>> the country is headed in the right direction backs that up.
Women, for one, certainly think it's going in the wrong
direction.
Biden leads a little with all women, but not as much as it used >>>>>>>> to be.
Yet somehow tRump has NEVER actually won an election.
<EYEROLL>
Yeah, MAGA cultists think tRump won the popular vote.
Amost everyone knows that he won the 2016 election. Those that
believe otherwise are morons.
He did not win the popular vote in 2016. He got the Electoral
College - NOT the Popular vote
And that's what counts.
Conservaturds keep claiming they are in the majority but the facts say otherwise.
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:6609ae01$0$1082217 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <uucaaq$1uljv$2@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.comin
says...
"max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in
news:uuc7vu$1u4b4$3@dont-email.me:
In news:uuc0as$1s66l$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:f0bi0j9qsiuu969l46go3js2ao12jhu5o6@4ax.com:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 02:47:37 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:b63h0jdiv9l8vjgojjk8s06dcn93hk8sh1@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 14:47:00 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote
usednews:6tff0jhrbovvuu187egshu48m8n8jf5r4f@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 02:33:07 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote
in news:ngnd0jlqiodntsplp6ou15pl36s5hpenja@4ax.com:
I believe you are wrong. I believe the vast majority of US
citizens
You live in an echo chamber.
want to make America great again
"Great again"? When was it great for blacks? For women? For
LGBTQ?
Great for everyone when Trump was Presodent.
and the fact that only a small minority of people think that
the country is headed in the right direction backs that up.
Women, for one, certainly think it's going in the wrong
direction.
Biden leads a little with all women, but not as much as it
to be.
Yet somehow tRump has NEVER actually won an election.
<EYEROLL>
Yeah, MAGA cultists think tRump won the popular vote.
Amost everyone knows that he won the 2016 election. Those that
believe otherwise are morons.
He did not win the popular vote in 2016. He got the Electoral
College - NOT the Popular vote
And that's what counts.
Conservaturds keep claiming they are in the majority but the facts say
otherwise.
The polls say they are ahead.
And yet he has never won the Popular vote - regardless of what the polls said.
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in news:h6aj0jt79lu66hn03bkqeb65uvvse3k3oc@4ax.com:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 15:43:24 -0000 (UTC), BaxterWell, it wasn't "totally insignificant" in 2020. And the fact remains
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>news:f0bi0j9qsiuu969l46go3js2ao12jhu5o6@4ax.com:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 02:47:37 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>news:b63h0jdiv9l8vjgojjk8s06dcn93hk8sh1@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 14:47:00 -0000 (UTC), Baxterbe.
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>>news:6tff0jhrbovvuu187egshu48m8n8jf5r4f@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 02:33:07 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>>>>news:ngnd0jlqiodntsplp6ou15pl36s5hpenja@4ax.com:
I believe you are wrong. I believe the vast majority of US >>>citizens
You live in an echo chamber.
want to make America great again
"Great again"? When was it great for blacks? For women? For >>>LGBTQ?
Great for everyone when Trump was Presodent.
and the fact that only a small
minority of people think that the country is headed in the >>>>>>>>>> right direction backs that up.
Women, for one, certainly think it's going in the wrong >>>>>>>>>direction.
Biden leads a little with all women, but not as much as it used >>>>>>>> to
Yet somehow tRump has NEVER actually won an election.
<EYEROLL>
Yeah, MAGA cultists think tRump won the popular vote.
Amost everyone knows that he won the 2016 election. Those that
believe otherwise are morons.
He did not win the popular vote in 2016. He got the Electoral
College - NOT the Popular vote
<SNICKER> The popular vote isn't what counts, Dummy, in fact the
popular vote is totally insignificant.
that tRump has NEVER, ever won the popular vote.
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in news:c1mj0j5sjimic9jekf3vaivjgaltbdm39q@4ax.com:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 18:36:37 -0000 (UTC), Baxterin
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>news:h6aj0jt79lu66hn03bkqeb65uvvse3k3oc@4ax.com:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 15:43:24 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>news:f0bi0j9qsiuu969l46go3js2ao12jhu5o6@4ax.com:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 02:47:37 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>>news:b63h0jdiv9l8vjgojjk8s06dcn93hk8sh1@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 14:47:00 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>>>>news:6tff0jhrbovvuu187egshu48m8n8jf5r4f@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 02:33:07 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote
Well, it wasn't "totally insignificant" in 2020.be.news:ngnd0jlqiodntsplp6ou15pl36s5hpenja@4ax.com:
I believe you are wrong. I believe the vast majority of US >>>>>citizens
You live in an echo chamber.
want to make America great again
"Great again"? When was it great for blacks? For women? For >>>>>LGBTQ?
Great for everyone when Trump was Presodent.
and the fact that only a small
minority of people think that the country is headed in the >>>>>>>>>>>> right direction backs that up.
Women, for one, certainly think it's going in the wrong >>>>>>>>>>>direction.
Biden leads a little with all women, but not as much as it used >>>>>>>>>> to
Yet somehow tRump has NEVER actually won an election.
<EYEROLL>
Yeah, MAGA cultists think tRump won the popular vote.
Amost everyone knows that he won the 2016 election. Those that
believe otherwise are morons.
He did not win the popular vote in 2016. He got the Electoral >>>>>College - NOT the Popular vote
<SNICKER> The popular vote isn't what counts, Dummy, in fact the
popular vote is totally insignificant.
It's totally insignifiant in every Presidential election.
And the fact remains
that tRump has NEVER, ever won the popular vote.
I'm pretty sure that was never his goal, at least not his primary
goal.
Then you should own up to how he got "elected" and quit claiming you
MAGAts are in the majority.
On 2024-03-31 16:56:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uuapfj$1gufv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-30 14:49:27 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu559s$3toku$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-28 14:21:31 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu30t4$3d7la$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-28 04:22:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu285g$348lv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-27 18:39:17 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu1c4j$2t8t5$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Strange - you say State big government should get involved but >>>>>>>>>>> not National government!
Which is more responsive to its residents?
In my state they're more responsive to outside special interest >>>>>>>>> groups backed by billionaires like the Kochs, like those who >>>>>>>>> crammed a school voucher with public funding program down their >>>>>>>>> throats on the threat of throwing a lot of money into campaigns >>>>>>>>> to primary them.
Wow, public funding-- funds taken from the public
schools
Public schools don't generate funds, they consume funds... which
come from taxpayers.
and used to pay for
private
schooling. Is that a problem?
It is to a lot of people, there's only so much money to go around >>>>>>> especially in a state that ranks 45th in education spending.
Shouldn't they be spending those precious taxpayer moneys in the
best manner possible?
Sure rob poor Peter to pay rich Paul, the Republican credo....
If everyone wanted to "keep their portion of their taxes" and spend it
on "better choices" there wouldn't be any highways or police or fire
departments or anything else it takes to live in a civilized society.
There aren't alternatives to government roads or fire departments; there
*are* alternatives to government schools.
Still doesn't give you the right to take money intended for public schools away.
On 2024-03-31 23:23:53 +0000, Lou Bricano said:
On 3/31/2024 2:08 PM, super70s wrote:
On 2024-03-31 16:56:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uuapfj$1gufv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-30 14:49:27 +0000, max headroom said:There aren't alternatives to government roads or fire departments;
In news:uu559s$3toku$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-28 14:21:31 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu30t4$3d7la$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-28 04:22:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu285g$348lv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-27 18:39:17 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu1c4j$2t8t5$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Strange - you say State big government should get involved but >>>>>>>>>>>>> not National government!
Which is more responsive to its residents?
In my state they're more responsive to outside special interest >>>>>>>>>>> groups backed by billionaires like the Kochs, like those who >>>>>>>>>>> crammed a school voucher with public funding program down their >>>>>>>>>>> throats on the threat of throwing a lot of money into campaigns >>>>>>>>>>> to primary them.
Wow, public funding-- funds taken from the public
schools
Public schools don't generate funds, they consume funds... which >>>>>>>> come from taxpayers.
and used to pay for
private
schooling. Is that a problem?
It is to a lot of people, there's only so much money to go around >>>>>>>>> especially in a state that ranks 45th in education spending.
Shouldn't they be spending those precious taxpayer moneys in the >>>>>>>> best manner possible?
Sure rob poor Peter to pay rich Paul, the Republican credo....
If everyone wanted to "keep their portion of their taxes" and spend it >>>>> on "better choices" there wouldn't be any highways or police or fire >>>>> departments or anything else it takes to live in a civilized society. >>>>
there *are* alternatives to government schools.
Still doesn't give you the right to take money intended for public
schools away.
Also there's no accountability how that public tax money is spent.... >>>>That's the point-- government schools are inferior to the private
sector.
I was talking about the $7K or whatever amount it is they're doling out
to the private/homeschoolers, dweeb.
... It could be spent on a trip to Vegas or expensive jewelry ...
Like Fani Willis?
? Try to stay on topic, silly goose.
...instead of your kid's education for all anyone knows (and it
probably is).
Parent are still responsible for educating their kids.
Is that clear enough for you to understand, Jiminy Cricket?
Yup. You're a statist.
And you're a fascist with no concern for the greater society.
Not wanting the state to be in the business of owning and operating
schools does not make one a fascist and is not a fascist position. In
fact, fascists probably *want* the government to own and operate schools,
so they can ensure the fascist indoctrination.
Modern states typically give financial assistance to lower income
families for food, housing and medical care, but we don't force them to
buy groceries in government commissaries; don't force them to live in
government barracks and dormitories; and don't force them to obtain
medical care from government clinics. We give them vouchers or electronic
benefit cards and let them buy the things they want from the suppliers
they choose. School instruction should be no different.
This voucher program I'm talking about and SNAP benefits are like apples
and oranges, the latter doesn't take money away from a food assistance program already in existence.
On 2024-03-31 23:23:53 +0000, Lou Bricano said:
On 3/31/2024 2:08 PM, super70s wrote:
On 2024-03-31 16:56:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uuapfj$1gufv$1@dont-email.me, super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> >>>> typed:
On 2024-03-30 14:49:27 +0000, max headroom said:There aren't alternatives to government roads or fire departments; there >>>> *are* alternatives to government schools.
In news:uu559s$3toku$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-28 14:21:31 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu30t4$3d7la$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-28 04:22:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu285g$348lv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-27 18:39:17 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu1c4j$2t8t5$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Strange - you say State big government should get involved but >>>>>>>>>>>>> not National government!
Which is more responsive to its residents?
In my state they're more responsive to outside special interest >>>>>>>>>>> groups backed by billionaires like the Kochs, like those who >>>>>>>>>>> crammed a school voucher with public funding program down their >>>>>>>>>>> throats on the threat of throwing a lot of money into campaigns >>>>>>>>>>> to primary them.
Wow, public funding-- funds taken from the public
schools
Public schools don't generate funds, they consume funds... which >>>>>>>> come from taxpayers.
and used to pay for
private
schooling. Is that a problem?
It is to a lot of people, there's only so much money to go around >>>>>>>>> especially in a state that ranks 45th in education spending.
Shouldn't they be spending those precious taxpayer moneys in the >>>>>>>> best manner possible?
Sure rob poor Peter to pay rich Paul, the Republican credo....
If everyone wanted to "keep their portion of their taxes" and spend it >>>>> on "better choices" there wouldn't be any highways or police or fire >>>>> departments or anything else it takes to live in a civilized society. >>>>
Still doesn't give you the right to take money intended for public schools away.
I was talking about the $7K or whatever amount it is they're doling out to >>> the private/homeschoolers, dweeb.Also there's no accountability how that public tax money is spent.... >>>>That's the point-- government schools are inferior to the private sector. >>>
... It could be spent on a trip to Vegas or expensive jewelry ...
Like Fani Willis?
? Try to stay on topic, silly goose.
...instead of your kid's education for all anyone knows (and it probably is).
Parent are still responsible for educating their kids.
Is that clear enough for you to understand, Jiminy Cricket?
Yup. You're a statist.
And you're a fascist with no concern for the greater society.
Not wanting the state to be in the business of owning and operating schools >> does not make one a fascist and is not a fascist position. In fact, fascists >> probably *want* the government to own and operate schools, so they can ensure
the fascist indoctrination.
Modern states typically give financial assistance to lower income families for
food, housing and medical care, but we don't force them to buy groceries in >> government commissaries; don't force them to live in government barracks and >> dormitories; and don't force them to obtain medical care from government
clinics. We give them vouchers or electronic benefit cards and let them buy >> the things they want from the suppliers they choose. School instruction should
be no different.
This voucher program I'm talking about and SNAP benefits are like apples and oranges, the latter doesn't take money away from a food assistance program already in existence.
Aren't you pro-choice?
<laugh> Suddenly the right-wing is "pro-choice" when it comes to >>>>>>> vouchers.
<laugh> Suddenly the left-wing isn't "pro-choice" when it comes to >>>>>> vouchers.
You have all the "choice" you want to send your kids to private
schools or homeschool them -- just do it on your own dime and not to >>>>> the detriment of public schools.
I did... but what about the working families whose kids attend crappy
schools because vouchers are unavailable?
What about upper middle class families who get vouchers when they can easily
afford to pay for a private education themselves?
School vouchers are means tested.
Not in my state.
How he got elected was to get the most electoral votes and I never
claimed that MAGA was the majority,
yet Trump appears to be more
popular than Biden.
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >news:th1l0jh9l814cg2mntkb1cl3sr09pce5d2@4ax.com:
How he got elected was to get the most electoral votes and I never
claimed that MAGA was the majority,
Bullshit!
yet Trump appears to be more
popular than Biden.
It would appear that wwy in an echo chamber.
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:6609ae01$0$1082217 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
In article <uucaaq$1uljv$2@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...in
"max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in
news:uuc7vu$1u4b4$3@dont-email.me:
In news:uuc0as$1s66l$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:f0bi0j9qsiuu969l46go3js2ao12jhu5o6@4ax.com:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 02:47:37 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:b63h0jdiv9l8vjgojjk8s06dcn93hk8sh1@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 14:47:00 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote
usednews:6tff0jhrbovvuu187egshu48m8n8jf5r4f@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 02:33:07 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote
in news:ngnd0jlqiodntsplp6ou15pl36s5hpenja@4ax.com:
I believe you are wrong. I believe the vast majority of US
citizens
You live in an echo chamber.
want to make America great again
"Great again"? When was it great for blacks? For women? For
LGBTQ?
Great for everyone when Trump was Presodent.
and the fact that only a small minority of people think that
the country is headed in the right direction backs that up.
Women, for one, certainly think it's going in the wrong
direction.
Biden leads a little with all women, but not as much as it
to be.
Yet somehow tRump has NEVER actually won an election.
<EYEROLL>
Yeah, MAGA cultists think tRump won the popular vote.
Amost everyone knows that he won the 2016 election. Those that
believe otherwise are morons.
He did not win the popular vote in 2016. He got the Electoral
College - NOT the Popular vote
And that's what counts.
Conservaturds keep claiming they are in the majority but the facts say
otherwise.
The polls say they are ahead.
And yet he has never won the Popular vote - regardless of what the polls said.
And anyone who can compare Biden's Easter message with tRump's Easter
message and still vote for tRump is totally immoral and corrupt.
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in news:c1mj0j5sjimic9jekf3vaivjgaltbdm39q@4ax.com:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 18:36:37 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
inBlue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>news:h6aj0jt79lu66hn03bkqeb65uvvse3k3oc@4ax.com:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 15:43:24 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>news:f0bi0j9qsiuu969l46go3js2ao12jhu5o6@4ax.com:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 02:47:37 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>news:b63h0jdiv9l8vjgojjk8s06dcn93hk8sh1@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 14:47:00 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>>>news:6tff0jhrbovvuu187egshu48m8n8jf5r4f@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 02:33:07 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote
Well, it wasn't "totally insignificant" in 2020.be.news:ngnd0jlqiodntsplp6ou15pl36s5hpenja@4ax.com:
I believe you are wrong. I believe the vast majority of US >>>>citizens
You live in an echo chamber.
want to make America great again
"Great again"? When was it great for blacks? For women? For >>>>LGBTQ?
Great for everyone when Trump was Presodent.
and the fact that only a small
minority of people think that the country is headed in the >>>>>>>>>>> right direction backs that up.
Women, for one, certainly think it's going in the wrong >>>>>>>>>>direction.
Biden leads a little with all women, but not as much as it used >>>>>>>>> to
Yet somehow tRump has NEVER actually won an election.
<EYEROLL>
Yeah, MAGA cultists think tRump won the popular vote.
Amost everyone knows that he won the 2016 election. Those that
believe otherwise are morons.
He did not win the popular vote in 2016. He got the Electoral >>>>College - NOT the Popular vote
<SNICKER> The popular vote isn't what counts, Dummy, in fact the
popular vote is totally insignificant.
It's totally insignifiant in every Presidential election.
And the fact remains
that tRump has NEVER, ever won the popular vote.
I'm pretty sure that was never his goal, at least not his primary
goal.
Then you should own up to how he got "elected" and quit claiming you
MAGAts are in the majority.
On Mon, 1 Apr 2024 03:18:20 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >news:c1mj0j5sjimic9jekf3vaivjgaltbdm39q@4ax.com:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 18:36:37 -0000 (UTC), Baxterin
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>news:h6aj0jt79lu66hn03bkqeb65uvvse3k3oc@4ax.com:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 15:43:24 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>news:f0bi0j9qsiuu969l46go3js2ao12jhu5o6@4ax.com:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 02:47:37 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>>news:b63h0jdiv9l8vjgojjk8s06dcn93hk8sh1@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 14:47:00 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>>>>news:6tff0jhrbovvuu187egshu48m8n8jf5r4f@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 02:33:07 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote
Well, it wasn't "totally insignificant" in 2020.be.news:ngnd0jlqiodntsplp6ou15pl36s5hpenja@4ax.com:
I believe you are wrong. I believe the vast majority of US >>>>>citizens
You live in an echo chamber.
want to make America great again
"Great again"? When was it great for blacks? For women? For >>>>>LGBTQ?
Great for everyone when Trump was Presodent.
and the fact that only a small
minority of people think that the country is headed in the >>>>>>>>>>>> right direction backs that up.
Women, for one, certainly think it's going in the wrong >>>>>>>>>>>direction.
Biden leads a little with all women, but not as much as it used >>>>>>>>>> to
Yet somehow tRump has NEVER actually won an election.
<EYEROLL>
Yeah, MAGA cultists think tRump won the popular vote.
Amost everyone knows that he won the 2016 election. Those that
believe otherwise are morons.
He did not win the popular vote in 2016. He got the Electoral >>>>>College - NOT the Popular vote
<SNICKER> The popular vote isn't what counts, Dummy, in fact the
popular vote is totally insignificant.
It's totally insignifiant in every Presidential election.
And the fact remains
that tRump has NEVER, ever won the popular vote.
I'm pretty sure that was never his goal, at least not his primary
goal.
Then you should own up to how he got "elected" and quit claiming you
MAGAts are in the majority.
How he got elected was to get the most electoral votes and I never
claimed that MAGA was the majority, yet Trump appears to be more
popular than Biden.
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message news:uud91s$290b3$3@dont-email.me...
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in news:c1mj0j5sjimic9jekf3vaivjgaltbdm39q@4ax.com:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 18:36:37 -0000 (UTC), Baxterin
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>news:h6aj0jt79lu66hn03bkqeb65uvvse3k3oc@4ax.com:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 15:43:24 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>news:f0bi0j9qsiuu969l46go3js2ao12jhu5o6@4ax.com:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 02:47:37 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>>news:b63h0jdiv9l8vjgojjk8s06dcn93hk8sh1@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 14:47:00 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>>>>news:6tff0jhrbovvuu187egshu48m8n8jf5r4f@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 02:33:07 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote
Well, it wasn't "totally insignificant" in 2020.be.news:ngnd0jlqiodntsplp6ou15pl36s5hpenja@4ax.com:
I believe you are wrong. I believe the vast majority of US >>>>>citizens
You live in an echo chamber.
want to make America great again
"Great again"? When was it great for blacks? For women? For >>>>>LGBTQ?
Great for everyone when Trump was Presodent.
and the fact that only a small
minority of people think that the country is headed in the >>>>>>>>>>>> right direction backs that up.
Women, for one, certainly think it's going in the wrong >>>>>>>>>>>direction.
Biden leads a little with all women, but not as much as it used >>>>>>>>>> to
Yet somehow tRump has NEVER actually won an election.
<EYEROLL>
Yeah, MAGA cultists think tRump won the popular vote.
Amost everyone knows that he won the 2016 election. Those that
believe otherwise are morons.
He did not win the popular vote in 2016. He got the Electoral >>>>>College - NOT the Popular vote
<SNICKER> The popular vote isn't what counts, Dummy, in fact the
popular vote is totally insignificant.
It's totally insignifiant in every Presidential election.
And the fact remains
that tRump has NEVER, ever won the popular vote.
I'm pretty sure that was never his goal, at least not his primary
goal.
Then you should own up to how he got "elected" and quit claiming you
MAGAts are in the majority.
You're the only one that seems to be complaining about how he was
elected....
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message news:uucaaq$1uljv$2@dont-email.me...
"max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in news:uuc7vu$1u4b4$3@dont-email.me:
In news:uuc0as$1s66l$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:f0bi0j9qsiuu969l46go3js2ao12jhu5o6@4ax.com:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 02:47:37 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:b63h0jdiv9l8vjgojjk8s06dcn93hk8sh1@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 14:47:00 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>>> news:6tff0jhrbovvuu187egshu48m8n8jf5r4f@4ax.com:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 02:33:07 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote >>>>>>>>> in news:ngnd0jlqiodntsplp6ou15pl36s5hpenja@4ax.com:
I believe you are wrong. I believe the vast majority of US >>>>>>>>>> citizens
You live in an echo chamber.
want to make America great again
"Great again"? When was it great for blacks? For women? For >>>>>>>>> LGBTQ?
Great for everyone when Trump was Presodent.
and the fact that only a small minority of people think that >>>>>>>>>> the country is headed in the right direction backs that up.
Women, for one, certainly think it's going in the wrong
direction.
Biden leads a little with all women, but not as much as it used >>>>>>>> to be.
Yet somehow tRump has NEVER actually won an election.
<EYEROLL>
Yeah, MAGA cultists think tRump won the popular vote.
Amost everyone knows that he won the 2016 election. Those that
believe otherwise are morons.
He did not win the popular vote in 2016. He got the Electoral
College - NOT the Popular vote
And that's what counts.
Conservaturds keep claiming they are in the majority but the facts say otherwise.
Then it must really suck, that you STILL can't win...
On 3/31/2024 5:29 PM, super70s wrote:
On 2024-03-31 23:23:53 +0000, Lou Bricano said:
On 3/31/2024 2:08 PM, super70s wrote:
On 2024-03-31 16:56:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uuapfj$1gufv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-30 14:49:27 +0000, max headroom said:There aren't alternatives to government roads or fire departments;
In news:uu559s$3toku$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-28 14:21:31 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu30t4$3d7la$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-28 04:22:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu285g$348lv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-27 18:39:17 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu1c4j$2t8t5$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Strange - you say State big government should get involved but >>>>>>>>>>>>>> not National government!
Which is more responsive to its residents?
In my state they're more responsive to outside special interest >>>>>>>>>>>> groups backed by billionaires like the Kochs, like those who >>>>>>>>>>>> crammed a school voucher with public funding program down their >>>>>>>>>>>> throats on the threat of throwing a lot of money into campaigns >>>>>>>>>>>> to primary them.
Wow, public funding-- funds taken from the public
schools
Public schools don't generate funds, they consume funds... which >>>>>>>>> come from taxpayers.
and used to pay for
private
schooling. Is that a problem?
It is to a lot of people, there's only so much money to go around >>>>>>>>>> especially in a state that ranks 45th in education spending.
Shouldn't they be spending those precious taxpayer moneys in the >>>>>>>>> best manner possible?
Sure rob poor Peter to pay rich Paul, the Republican credo....
If everyone wanted to "keep their portion of their taxes" and spend it >>>>>> on "better choices" there wouldn't be any highways or police or fire >>>>>> departments or anything else it takes to live in a civilized society. >>>>>
there *are* alternatives to government schools.
Still doesn't give you the right to take money intended for public
schools away.
I was talking about the $7K or whatever amount it is they're doling out >>>> to the private/homeschoolers, dweeb.Also there's no accountability how that public tax money is spent.... >>>>>That's the point-- government schools are inferior to the private sector. >>>>
... It could be spent on a trip to Vegas or expensive jewelry ...
Like Fani Willis?
? Try to stay on topic, silly goose.
...instead of your kid's education for all anyone knows (and it probably is).
Parent are still responsible for educating their kids.
Is that clear enough for you to understand, Jiminy Cricket?
Yup. You're a statist.
And you're a fascist with no concern for the greater society.
Not wanting the state to be in the business of owning and operating
schools does not make one a fascist and is not a fascist position. In
fact, fascists probably *want* the government to own and operate
schools, so they can ensure the fascist indoctrination.
Modern states typically give financial assistance to lower income
families for food, housing and medical care, but we don't force them to
buy groceries in government commissaries; don't force them to live in
government barracks and dormitories; and don't force them to obtain
medical care from government clinics. We give them vouchers or
electronic benefit cards and let them buy the things they want from the
suppliers they choose. School instruction should be no different.
This voucher program I'm talking about and SNAP benefits are like
apples and oranges, the latter doesn't take money away from a food
assistance program already in existence.
There shouldn't be a public schools program in existence, any more than
there should be government barracks to provide housing to low-income
people or government commissaries where lower income people are forced
to shop for groceries. All public financing of schooling should be
through vouchers.
Aren't you pro-choice?
<laugh> Suddenly the right-wing is "pro-choice" when it comes to >>>>>>>> vouchers.
<laugh> Suddenly the left-wing isn't "pro-choice" when it comes to >>>>>>> vouchers.
You have all the "choice" you want to send your kids to private
schools or homeschool them -- just do it on your own dime and not to >>>>>> the detriment of public schools.
I did... but what about the working families whose kids attend crappy >>>>> schools because vouchers are unavailable?
What about upper middle class families who get vouchers when they can
easily afford to pay for a private education themselves?
School vouchers are means tested.
Not in my state.
Yes, they are.
On 31 Mar 2024, Lou Bricano <lb@cap.con> posted some news:egmON.615206$c3Ea.458041@fx10.iad:
On 3/31/2024 2:08 PM, super70s wrote:
On 2024-03-31 16:56:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uuapfj$1gufv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-30 14:49:27 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu559s$3toku$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-28 14:21:31 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu30t4$3d7la$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-28 04:22:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu285g$348lv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-27 18:39:17 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu1c4j$2t8t5$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Strange - you say State big government should get involved >>>>>>>>>>>>> but not National government!
Which is more responsive to its residents?
In my state they're more responsive to outside special
interest groups backed by billionaires like the Kochs, like >>>>>>>>>>> those who crammed a school voucher with public funding
program down their throats on the threat of throwing a lot of >>>>>>>>>>> money into campaigns to primary them.
Wow, public funding-- funds taken from the public
schools
Public schools don't generate funds, they consume funds... which >>>>>>>> come from taxpayers.
and used to pay for
private
schooling. Is that a problem?
It is to a lot of people, there's only so much money to go
around especially in a state that ranks 45th in education
spending.
Shouldn't they be spending those precious taxpayer moneys in the >>>>>>>> best manner possible?
Sure rob poor Peter to pay rich Paul, the Republican credo....
If everyone wanted to "keep their portion of their taxes" and spend
it on "better choices" there wouldn't be any highways or police or
fire departments or anything else it takes to live in a civilized
society.
There aren't alternatives to government roads or fire departments;
there *are* alternatives to government schools.
Still doesn't give you the right to take money intended for public
schools away.
Also there's no accountability how that public tax money is
spent....
That's the point-- government schools are inferior to the private
sector.
I was talking about the $7K or whatever amount it is they're doling
out to the private/homeschoolers, dweeb.
... It could be spent on a trip to Vegas or expensive jewelry ...
Like Fani Willis?
? Try to stay on topic, silly goose.
...instead of your kid's education for all anyone knows (and it
probably is).
Parent are still responsible for educating their kids.
Is that clear enough for you to understand, Jiminy Cricket?
Yup. You're a statist.
And you're a fascist with no concern for the greater society.
Not wanting the state to be in the business of owning and operating
schools does not make one a fascist and is not a fascist position. In
fact, fascists probably *want* the government to own and operate
schools, so they can ensure the fascist indoctrination.
Like queers are doing in the present era to force acceptance of their
mental illness as "normal". It's not happening.
Modern states typically give financial assistance to lower income
families for food, housing and medical care, but we don't force them
to buy groceries in government commissaries; don't force them to live
in government barracks and dormitories; and don't force them to obtain
medical care from government clinics. We give them vouchers or
electronic benefit cards and let them buy the things they want from
the suppliers they choose. School instruction should be no different.
Remove social activism from schools. It has no place there.
Aren't you pro-choice?
<laugh> Suddenly the right-wing is "pro-choice" when it comes to >>>>>>> vouchers.
<laugh> Suddenly the left-wing isn't "pro-choice" when it comes to >>>>>> vouchers.
You have all the "choice" you want to send your kids to private
schools or homeschool them -- just do it on your own dime and not
to the detriment of public schools.
I did... but what about the working families whose kids attend
crappy schools because vouchers are unavailable?
What about upper middle class families who get vouchers when they can
easily afford to pay for a private education themselves?
School vouchers are means tested.
Unions hate vouchers. It removes the leverage they have to advance their agendas.
On Mon, 1 Apr 2024 15:01:08 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>news:th1l0jh9l814cg2mntkb1cl3sr09pce5d2@4ax.com:
How he got elected was to get the most electoral votes and I never
claimed that MAGA was the majority,
Bullshit!
yet Trump appears to be more
popular than Biden.
It would appear that wwy in an echo chamber.
https://www.realclearpolling.com/polls/president/general/2024/trump-vs-
biden
On 2024-04-01 12:46:31 +0000, Lou Bricano said:
On 3/31/2024 5:29 PM, super70s wrote:
On 2024-03-31 23:23:53 +0000, Lou Bricano said:
On 3/31/2024 2:08 PM, super70s wrote:
On 2024-03-31 16:56:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uuapfj$1gufv$1@dont-email.me, super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid>
typed:
On 2024-03-30 14:49:27 +0000, max headroom said:There aren't alternatives to government roads or fire departments; there >>>>>> *are* alternatives to government schools.
In news:uu559s$3toku$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-28 14:21:31 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu30t4$3d7la$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-28 04:22:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu285g$348lv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-27 18:39:17 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu1c4j$2t8t5$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Strange - you say State big government should get involved but >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not National government!
Which is more responsive to its residents?
In my state they're more responsive to outside special interest >>>>>>>>>>>>> groups backed by billionaires like the Kochs, like those who >>>>>>>>>>>>> crammed a school voucher with public funding program down their >>>>>>>>>>>>> throats on the threat of throwing a lot of money into campaigns >>>>>>>>>>>>> to primary them.
Wow, public funding-- funds taken from the public
schools
Public schools don't generate funds, they consume funds... which >>>>>>>>>> come from taxpayers.
and used to pay for
private
schooling. Is that a problem?
It is to a lot of people, there's only so much money to go around >>>>>>>>>>> especially in a state that ranks 45th in education spending.
Shouldn't they be spending those precious taxpayer moneys in the >>>>>>>>>> best manner possible?
Sure rob poor Peter to pay rich Paul, the Republican credo....
If everyone wanted to "keep their portion of their taxes" and spend it >>>>>>> on "better choices" there wouldn't be any highways or police or fire >>>>>>> departments or anything else it takes to live in a civilized society. >>>>>>
Still doesn't give you the right to take money intended for public schools
away.
Also there's no accountability how that public tax money is spent.... >>>>>>That's the point-- government schools are inferior to the private sector.
I was talking about the $7K or whatever amount it is they're doling out to
the private/homeschoolers, dweeb.
... It could be spent on a trip to Vegas or expensive jewelry ... >>>>>>Like Fani Willis?
? Try to stay on topic, silly goose.
...instead of your kid's education for all anyone knows (and it probably
is).
Parent are still responsible for educating their kids.
Is that clear enough for you to understand, Jiminy Cricket?
Yup. You're a statist.
And you're a fascist with no concern for the greater society.
Not wanting the state to be in the business of owning and operating schools
does not make one a fascist and is not a fascist position. In fact, fascists
probably *want* the government to own and operate schools, so they can >>>> ensure the fascist indoctrination.
Modern states typically give financial assistance to lower income families >>>> for food, housing and medical care, but we don't force them to buy groceries
in government commissaries; don't force them to live in government barracks
and dormitories; and don't force them to obtain medical care from government
clinics. We give them vouchers or electronic benefit cards and let them buy
the things they want from the suppliers they choose. School instruction >>>> should be no different.
This voucher program I'm talking about and SNAP benefits are like apples and
oranges, the latter doesn't take money away from a food assistance program >>> already in existence.
There shouldn't be a public schools program in existence, any more than there
should be government barracks to provide housing to low-income people or
government commissaries where lower income people are forced to shop for
groceries. All public financing of schooling should be through vouchers.
Aren't you pro-choice?
<laugh> Suddenly the right-wing is "pro-choice" when it comes to >>>>>>>>> vouchers.
<laugh> Suddenly the left-wing isn't "pro-choice" when it comes to >>>>>>>> vouchers.
You have all the "choice" you want to send your kids to private
schools or homeschool them -- just do it on your own dime and not to >>>>>>> the detriment of public schools.
I did... but what about the working families whose kids attend crappy >>>>>> schools because vouchers are unavailable?
What about upper middle class families who get vouchers when they can >>>>> easily afford to pay for a private education themselves?
School vouchers are means tested.
Not in my state.
Yes, they are.
No they aren't.
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >news:q0pl0jt93asrnqbn5dfebcesnh45uf4pmh@4ax.com:
On Mon, 1 Apr 2024 15:01:08 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>news:th1l0jh9l814cg2mntkb1cl3sr09pce5d2@4ax.com:
How he got elected was to get the most electoral votes and I never
claimed that MAGA was the majority,
Bullshit!
yet Trump appears to be more
popular than Biden.
It would appear that wwy in an echo chamber.
https://www.realclearpolling.com/polls/president/general/2024/trump-vs-
biden
And the media said Dewey defeted Truman.
MAGA is NOT the Majority,
On 4/1/2024 3:10 PM, super70s wrote:
On 2024-04-01 12:46:31 +0000, Lou Bricano said:
On 3/31/2024 5:29 PM, super70s wrote:
On 2024-03-31 23:23:53 +0000, Lou Bricano said:
On 3/31/2024 2:08 PM, super70s wrote:
On 2024-03-31 16:56:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uuapfj$1gufv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-30 14:49:27 +0000, max headroom said:There aren't alternatives to government roads or fire departments; >>>>>>> there *are* alternatives to government schools.
In news:uu559s$3toku$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-28 14:21:31 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu30t4$3d7la$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-28 04:22:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu285g$348lv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-27 18:39:17 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu1c4j$2t8t5$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Strange - you say State big government should get involved but >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not National government!
Which is more responsive to its residents?
In my state they're more responsive to outside special interest >>>>>>>>>>>>>> groups backed by billionaires like the Kochs, like those who >>>>>>>>>>>>>> crammed a school voucher with public funding program down their >>>>>>>>>>>>>> throats on the threat of throwing a lot of money into campaigns >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to primary them.
Wow, public funding-- funds taken from the public
schools
Public schools don't generate funds, they consume funds... which >>>>>>>>>>> come from taxpayers.
and used to pay for
private
schooling. Is that a problem?
It is to a lot of people, there's only so much money to go around >>>>>>>>>>>> especially in a state that ranks 45th in education spending. >>>>>>>Shouldn't they be spending those precious taxpayer moneys in the >>>>>>>>>>> best manner possible?
If everyone wanted to "keep their portion of their taxes" and spend it >>>>>>>> on "better choices" there wouldn't be any highways or police or fire >>>>>>>> departments or anything else it takes to live in a civilized society. >>>>>>>Sure rob poor Peter to pay rich Paul, the Republican credo.... >>>>>>>
Still doesn't give you the right to take money intended for public >>>>>> schools away.
Also there's no accountability how that public tax money is spent.... >>>>>>>That's the point-- government schools are inferior to the private sector.
I was talking about the $7K or whatever amount it is they're doling out >>>>>> to the private/homeschoolers, dweeb.
... It could be spent on a trip to Vegas or expensive jewelry ... >>>>>>>Like Fani Willis?
? Try to stay on topic, silly goose.
...instead of your kid's education for all anyone knows (and it probably is).
Parent are still responsible for educating their kids.
Is that clear enough for you to understand, Jiminy Cricket?
Yup. You're a statist.
And you're a fascist with no concern for the greater society.
Not wanting the state to be in the business of owning and operating
schools does not make one a fascist and is not a fascist position. In >>>>> fact, fascists probably *want* the government to own and operate
schools, so they can ensure the fascist indoctrination.
Modern states typically give financial assistance to lower income
families for food, housing and medical care, but we don't force them to >>>>> buy groceries in government commissaries; don't force them to live in >>>>> government barracks and dormitories; and don't force them to obtain
medical care from government clinics. We give them vouchers or
electronic benefit cards and let them buy the things they want from the >>>>> suppliers they choose. School instruction should be no different.
This voucher program I'm talking about and SNAP benefits are like
apples and oranges, the latter doesn't take money away from a food
assistance program already in existence.
There shouldn't be a public schools program in existence, any more than
there should be government barracks to provide housing to low-income
people or government commissaries where lower income people are forced
to shop for groceries. All public financing of schooling should be
through vouchers.
Aren't you pro-choice?
<laugh> Suddenly the right-wing is "pro-choice" when it comes to >>>>>>>>>> vouchers.
<laugh> Suddenly the left-wing isn't "pro-choice" when it comes to >>>>>>>>> vouchers.
You have all the "choice" you want to send your kids to private >>>>>>>> schools or homeschool them -- just do it on your own dime and not to >>>>>>>> the detriment of public schools.
I did... but what about the working families whose kids attend crappy >>>>>>> schools because vouchers are unavailable?
What about upper middle class families who get vouchers when they can >>>>>> easily afford to pay for a private education themselves?
School vouchers are means tested.
Not in my state.
Yes, they are.
No they aren't.
Since you won't identify the state so it can be verified, we'll assume
you're lying.
"super70s" <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote in message news:uucjcl$20od1$1@dont-email.me...
On 2024-03-31 16:56:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uuapfj$1gufv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-30 14:49:27 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu559s$3toku$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-28 14:21:31 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu30t4$3d7la$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-28 04:22:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu285g$348lv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-27 18:39:17 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu1c4j$2t8t5$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Strange - you say State big government should get involved but >>>>>>>>>>>> not National government!
Which is more responsive to its residents?
In my state they're more responsive to outside special interest >>>>>>>>>> groups backed by billionaires like the Kochs, like those who >>>>>>>>>> crammed a school voucher with public funding program down their >>>>>>>>>> throats on the threat of throwing a lot of money into campaigns >>>>>>>>>> to primary them.
Wow, public funding-- funds taken from the public
schools
Public schools don't generate funds, they consume funds... which >>>>>>> come from taxpayers.
and used to pay for
private
schooling. Is that a problem?
It is to a lot of people, there's only so much money to go around >>>>>>>> especially in a state that ranks 45th in education spending.
Shouldn't they be spending those precious taxpayer moneys in the >>>>>>> best manner possible?
Sure rob poor Peter to pay rich Paul, the Republican credo....
If everyone wanted to "keep their portion of their taxes" and spend it >>>> on "better choices" there wouldn't be any highways or police or fire
departments or anything else it takes to live in a civilized society.
There aren't alternatives to government roads or fire departments;
there *are* alternatives to government schools.
Still doesn't give you the right to take money intended for public
schools away.
Sure it does. We decide what will be done with our money.
We decided it wasn't fair to deny parents some portion of the money
they were spending on schools they weren't using.
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in news:q0pl0jt93asrnqbn5dfebcesnh45uf4pmh@4ax.com:
On Mon, 1 Apr 2024 15:01:08 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>news:th1l0jh9l814cg2mntkb1cl3sr09pce5d2@4ax.com:
How he got elected was to get the most electoral votes and I never
claimed that MAGA was the majority,
Bullshit!
yet Trump appears to be more
popular than Biden.
It would appear that wwy in an echo chamber.
https://www.realclearpolling.com/polls/president/general/2024/trump-vs-
biden
And the media said Dewey defeted Truman.
MAGA is NOT the Majority,
On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 02:30:13 -0000 (UTC), Baxtervs-
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>news:q0pl0jt93asrnqbn5dfebcesnh45uf4pmh@4ax.com:
On Mon, 1 Apr 2024 15:01:08 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>news:th1l0jh9l814cg2mntkb1cl3sr09pce5d2@4ax.com:
How he got elected was to get the most electoral votes and I never
claimed that MAGA was the majority,
Bullshit!
yet Trump appears to be more
popular than Biden.
It would appear that wwy in an echo chamber.
https://www.realclearpolling.com/polls/president/general/2024/trump-
biden
And the media said Dewey defeted Truman.
MAGA is NOT the Majority,
Perhaps, but neither are the far leftist freaks.
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in news:ca9n0jhbk1ajpgu34p6r455qvet2drqbka@4ax.com:
On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 02:30:13 -0000 (UTC), Baxtervs-
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>news:q0pl0jt93asrnqbn5dfebcesnh45uf4pmh@4ax.com:
On Mon, 1 Apr 2024 15:01:08 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>news:th1l0jh9l814cg2mntkb1cl3sr09pce5d2@4ax.com:
How he got elected was to get the most electoral votes and I never >>>>>> claimed that MAGA was the majority,
Bullshit!
yet Trump appears to be more
popular than Biden.
It would appear that wwy in an echo chamber.
https://www.realclearpolling.com/polls/president/general/2024/trump-
biden
And the media said Dewey defeted Truman.
MAGA is NOT the Majority,
Perhaps, but neither are the far leftist freaks.
How can that be - you reguard anyone to the left of your own glorious
self as a "far leftist freaks"?
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >news:ca9n0jhbk1ajpgu34p6r455qvet2drqbka@4ax.com:
On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 02:30:13 -0000 (UTC), Baxtervs-
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>news:q0pl0jt93asrnqbn5dfebcesnh45uf4pmh@4ax.com:
On Mon, 1 Apr 2024 15:01:08 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>news:th1l0jh9l814cg2mntkb1cl3sr09pce5d2@4ax.com:
How he got elected was to get the most electoral votes and I never >>>>>> claimed that MAGA was the majority,
Bullshit!
yet Trump appears to be more
popular than Biden.
It would appear that wwy in an echo chamber.
https://www.realclearpolling.com/polls/president/general/2024/trump-
biden
And the media said Dewey defeted Truman.
MAGA is NOT the Majority,
Perhaps, but neither are the far leftist freaks.
How can that be - you reguard anyone to the left of your own glorious
self as a "far leftist freaks"?
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in news:ca9n0jhbk1ajpgu34p6r455qvet2drqbka@4ax.com:
On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 02:30:13 -0000 (UTC), Baxtervs-
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>news:q0pl0jt93asrnqbn5dfebcesnh45uf4pmh@4ax.com:
On Mon, 1 Apr 2024 15:01:08 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>news:th1l0jh9l814cg2mntkb1cl3sr09pce5d2@4ax.com:
How he got elected was to get the most electoral votes and I never >>>>>> claimed that MAGA was the majority,
Bullshit!
yet Trump appears to be more
popular than Biden.
It would appear that wwy in an echo chamber.
https://www.realclearpolling.com/polls/president/general/2024/trump-
biden
And the media said Dewey defeted Truman.
MAGA is NOT the Majority,
Perhaps, but neither are the far leftist freaks.
How can that be - you reguard anyone to the left of your own glorious
self as a "far leftist freaks"?
On 2024-04-02 05:03:40 +0000, Lou Bricano said:
On 4/1/2024 3:10 PM, super70s wrote:
On 2024-04-01 12:46:31 +0000, Lou Bricano said:
On 3/31/2024 5:29 PM, super70s wrote:
On 2024-03-31 23:23:53 +0000, Lou Bricano said:
On 3/31/2024 2:08 PM, super70s wrote:
On 2024-03-31 16:56:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uuapfj$1gufv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-30 14:49:27 +0000, max headroom said:There aren't alternatives to government roads or fire departments; there
In news:uu559s$3toku$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-28 14:21:31 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu30t4$3d7la$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-28 04:22:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu285g$348lv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-27 18:39:17 +0000, max headroom said: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In news:uu1c4j$2t8t5$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Strange - you say State big government should get involved but
not National government!
Which is more responsive to its residents?
In my state they're more responsive to outside special interest >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> groups backed by billionaires like the Kochs, like those who >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> crammed a school voucher with public funding program down their >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> throats on the threat of throwing a lot of money into campaigns >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to primary them.
Wow, public funding-- funds taken from the public
schools
Public schools don't generate funds, they consume funds... which >>>>>>>>>>>> come from taxpayers.
and used to pay for
private
schooling. Is that a problem?
It is to a lot of people, there's only so much money to go around >>>>>>>>>>>>> especially in a state that ranks 45th in education spending. >>>>>>>>Shouldn't they be spending those precious taxpayer moneys in the >>>>>>>>>>>> best manner possible?
If everyone wanted to "keep their portion of their taxes" and spend itSure rob poor Peter to pay rich Paul, the Republican credo.... >>>>>>>>
on "better choices" there wouldn't be any highways or police or fire >>>>>>>>> departments or anything else it takes to live in a civilized society. >>>>>>>>
*are* alternatives to government schools.
Still doesn't give you the right to take money intended for public >>>>>>> schools away.
Also there's no accountability how that public tax money is spent.... >>>>>>>>That's the point-- government schools are inferior to the private sector.
I was talking about the $7K or whatever amount it is they're doling out >>>>>>> to the private/homeschoolers, dweeb.
... It could be spent on a trip to Vegas or expensive jewelry ... >>>>>>>>Like Fani Willis?
? Try to stay on topic, silly goose.
...instead of your kid's education for all anyone knows (and it >>>>>>>>> probably is).
Parent are still responsible for educating their kids.
Is that clear enough for you to understand, Jiminy Cricket?
Yup. You're a statist.
And you're a fascist with no concern for the greater society.
Not wanting the state to be in the business of owning and operating >>>>>> schools does not make one a fascist and is not a fascist position. In >>>>>> fact, fascists probably *want* the government to own and operate schools,
so they can ensure the fascist indoctrination.
Modern states typically give financial assistance to lower income families
for food, housing and medical care, but we don't force them to buy >>>>>> groceries in government commissaries; don't force them to live in
government barracks and dormitories; and don't force them to obtain >>>>>> medical care from government clinics. We give them vouchers or electronic
benefit cards and let them buy the things they want from the suppliers >>>>>> they choose. School instruction should be no different.
This voucher program I'm talking about and SNAP benefits are like apples >>>>> and oranges, the latter doesn't take money away from a food assistance >>>>> program already in existence.
There shouldn't be a public schools program in existence, any more than >>>> there should be government barracks to provide housing to low-income people
or government commissaries where lower income people are forced to shop for
groceries. All public financing of schooling should be through vouchers. >>>>
Aren't you pro-choice?
<laugh> Suddenly the right-wing is "pro-choice" when it comes to >>>>>>>>>>> vouchers.
<laugh> Suddenly the left-wing isn't "pro-choice" when it comes to >>>>>>>>>> vouchers.
You have all the "choice" you want to send your kids to private >>>>>>>>> schools or homeschool them -- just do it on your own dime and not to >>>>>>>>> the detriment of public schools.
I did... but what about the working families whose kids attend crappy >>>>>>>> schools because vouchers are unavailable?
What about upper middle class families who get vouchers when they can >>>>>>> easily afford to pay for a private education themselves?
School vouchers are means tested.
Not in my state.
Yes, they are.
No they aren't.
Since you won't identify the state so it can be verified, we'll assume you're
lying.
Since you assume every state is like your own
On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 14:54:55 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >news:ca9n0jhbk1ajpgu34p6r455qvet2drqbka@4ax.com:
On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 02:30:13 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>news:q0pl0jt93asrnqbn5dfebcesnh45uf4pmh@4ax.com:
On Mon, 1 Apr 2024 15:01:08 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in >>>>>news:th1l0jh9l814cg2mntkb1cl3sr09pce5d2@4ax.com:
How he got elected was to get the most electoral votes and I never >>>>>> claimed that MAGA was the majority,
Bullshit!
yet Trump appears to be more
popular than Biden.
It would appear that wwy in an echo chamber.
https://www.realclearpolling.com/polls/president/general/2024/trump- >vs-
biden
And the media said Dewey defeted Truman.
MAGA is NOT the Majority,
Perhaps, but neither are the far leftist freaks.
How can that be - you reguard anyone to the left of your own glorious
self as a "far leftist freaks"?
No, actually, there are people who prefer RFK jr.
On 2024-04-01 01:57:34 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uucjcl$20od1$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-31 16:56:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uuapfj$1gufv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-30 14:49:27 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu559s$3toku$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-28 14:21:31 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu30t4$3d7la$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-28 04:22:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu285g$348lv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-27 18:39:17 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu1c4j$2t8t5$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Strange - you say State big government should get involved >>>>>>>>>>>>> but not National government!
Which is more responsive to its residents?
In my state they're more responsive to outside special
interest groups backed by billionaires like the Kochs, like >>>>>>>>>>> those who crammed a school voucher with public funding
program down their throats on the threat of throwing a lot >>>>>>>>>>> of money into campaigns to primary them.
Wow, public funding-- funds taken from the public
schools
Public schools don't generate funds, they consume funds...
which come from taxpayers.
and used to pay for
private
schooling. Is that a problem?
It is to a lot of people, there's only so much money to go
around especially in a state that ranks 45th in education
spending.
Shouldn't they be spending those precious taxpayer moneys in
the best manner possible?
Sure rob poor Peter to pay rich Paul, the Republican credo....
Yet it's the pinkies who want high school grads to pay off the
student loans of college grads.
I don't happen to be for that myself, Jiminy Cricket.
Although many times students sign up for big college loans without
knowing what they've gotten themselves into, and there's no incentive
for the lenders to explain it to them because they're making out like bandits.
... Most of those parents with kids in private schools are
already well off.
It's the parents of kids in crappy government schools who beg for
vouchers.
Cite, Jiminy Cricket?
No parents were "begging for vouchers" in my state, some outside
special interest group financed by the Kochs just horned their way in
and forced it on the politicians.
REVEALED: Secret recording shows pressure on Republican lawmakers to
vote for school vouchers
https://www.newschannel5.com/news/newschannel-5-investigates/revealed/revealed-secret-recording-shows-pressure-on-republican-lawmakers-to-vote-for-school-vouchers
If you want to send your kids to a private school or homeschool
yourself do it on your own dime.
How about the government letting me keep the portion of my taxes
that are spent on government schools so I can fund a better
choice?
If everyone wanted to "keep their portion of their taxes" and
spend it on "better choices" there wouldn't be any highways or
police or fire departments or anything else it takes to live in a
civilized society.
There aren't alternatives to government roads or fire departments;
there *are* alternatives to government schools.
Still doesn't give you the right to take money intended for public
schools away.
Shouldn't that money go to the best schooling available?
Not at the expense of public schools.
And who are you to say private/homeschooling is automatically better.
Also there's no accountability how that public tax money is
spent....
That's the point-- government schools are inferior to the private
sector.
I was talking about the $7K or whatever amount it is they're doling
out to the private/homeschoolers, dweeb.
That's the point, dweeb--that tax money could be better spent on
non-government schooling.
... It could be spent on a trip to Vegas or expensive jewelry ...
Like Fani Willis?
? Try to stay on topic, silly goose.
You first.
...instead of your kid's education for all anyone knows (and it
probably is).
Parent are still responsible for educating their kids.
Is that clear enough for you to understand, Jiminy Cricket?
Yup. You're a statist.
And you're a fascist with no concern for the greater society.
BWAHAHAHAHAhahahahahahaha... now I'm a fascist because I want better
schools.
No you're a fascist because you don't care if right-wing billionaires
force their personal agendas on you (whether you're too dumb to
realize it or not).
Aren't you pro-choice?
<laugh> Suddenly the right-wing is "pro-choice" when it comes to >>>>>>> vouchers.
<laugh> Suddenly the left-wing isn't "pro-choice" when it comes
to vouchers.
You have all the "choice" you want to send your kids to private
schools or homeschool them -- just do it on your own dime and not
to the detriment of public schools.
I did... but what about the working families whose kids attend
crappy schools because vouchers are unavailable?
What about upper middle class families who get vouchers when they
can easily afford to pay for a private education themselves?
Cite?
I thought you wingerdingers were against waste in goverment.
Like government schools? You bet!
No like doling out money to parents willy-nilly who may or may not use
it to educate their kids.
Don't you want your kids to have the best education available?
I want everyone's kids to have the best education available, not >>>>>>> just my own.
So you're a socialist-- you care less for your own kids than for
others'.
And you're a typical self-centered wingnut who has no problem
letting billionaires like the Kochs shove their personal ideology
down your throat just because they have the big bucks to do it.
And threaten lawmakers with their jobs if they don't acquiesce.
And you're a typical self-centered wingnut who has no problem
letting billionaires like Soros shove his personal ideology down
your throat just because he has the big bucks to do it, and
threaten lawmakers with their jobs if they don't acquiesce.
Show me an example of Soros giving money and then threatening
lawmakers if they don't abide by his wishes, asshole.
How many election campaigns has he financed?
Hell if I know, probably dwarfs the number of campaigns the bevy of right-wing billionaires you're so enamored with are financing these days.
ou reguard anyone to the left of your own glorious
self as a "far leftist freaks"?
MAGA is NOT the Majority,
Bullshit!
In news:uugavg$32jej$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-04-01 01:57:34 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uucjcl$20od1$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-31 16:56:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uuapfj$1gufv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-30 14:49:27 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu559s$3toku$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-28 14:21:31 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu30t4$3d7la$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-28 04:22:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu285g$348lv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-27 18:39:17 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu1c4j$2t8t5$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Strange - you say State big government should get involved >>>>>>>>>>>>>> but not National government!
Which is more responsive to its residents?
In my state they're more responsive to outside special >>>>>>>>>>>> interest groups backed by billionaires like the Kochs, like >>>>>>>>>>>> those who crammed a school voucher with public funding >>>>>>>>>>>> program down their throats on the threat of throwing a lot >>>>>>>>>>>> of money into campaigns to primary them.
Wow, public funding-- funds taken from the public
schools
Public schools don't generate funds, they consume funds...
which come from taxpayers.
and used to pay for
private
schooling. Is that a problem?
It is to a lot of people, there's only so much money to go >>>>>>>>>> around especially in a state that ranks 45th in education
spending.
Shouldn't they be spending those precious taxpayer moneys in >>>>>>>>> the best manner possible?
Sure rob poor Peter to pay rich Paul, the Republican credo....
Yet it's the pinkies who want high school grads to pay off the
student loans of college grads.
I don't happen to be for that myself, Jiminy Cricket.
Although many times students sign up for big college loans without
knowing what they've gotten themselves into, and there's no incentive
for the lenders to explain it to them because they're making out like
bandits.
... Most of those parents with kids in private schools are
already well off.
It's the parents of kids in crappy government schools who beg for >>>>>>> vouchers.
Cite, Jiminy Cricket?
https://nextstepsblog.org/2021/06/national-survey-shows-black-parents-continue-to-support-education-choice/
No parents were "begging for vouchers" in my state, some outside
special interest group financed by the Kochs just horned their way in
and forced it on the politicians.
REVEALED: Secret recording shows pressure on Republican lawmakers to
vote for school vouchers
https://www.newschannel5.com/news/newschannel-5-investigates/revealed/revealed-secret-recording-shows-pressure-on-republican-lawmakers-to-vote-for-school-vouchers
If you want to send your kids to a private school or homeschool >>>>>>>> yourself do it on your own dime.
How about the government letting me keep the portion of my taxes >>>>>>> that are spent on government schools so I can fund a better
choice?
If everyone wanted to "keep their portion of their taxes" and
spend it on "better choices" there wouldn't be any highways or
police or fire departments or anything else it takes to live in a
civilized society.
There aren't alternatives to government roads or fire departments;
there *are* alternatives to government schools.
Still doesn't give you the right to take money intended for public
schools away.
Shouldn't that money go to the best schooling available?
Not at the expense of public schools.
So you'd prefer inferior government schools be funded before superior
private schools. Ok.
And who are you to say private/homeschooling is automatically better.
Who are you to say government schools are adequate?
https://news.gallup.com/poll/1612/education.aspx
Also there's no accountability how that public tax money is
spent....
That's the point-- government schools are inferior to the private
sector.
I was talking about the $7K or whatever amount it is they're doling
out to the private/homeschoolers, dweeb.
That's the point, dweeb--that tax money could be better spent on
non-government schooling.
... It could be spent on a trip to Vegas or expensive jewelry ...
Like Fani Willis?
? Try to stay on topic, silly goose.
You first.
...instead of your kid's education for all anyone knows (and it
probably is).
Parent are still responsible for educating their kids.
Is that clear enough for you to understand, Jiminy Cricket?
Yup. You're a statist.
And you're a fascist with no concern for the greater society.
BWAHAHAHAHAhahahahahahaha... now I'm a fascist because I want better
schools.
No you're a fascist because you don't care if right-wing billionaires
force their personal agendas on you (whether you're too dumb to
realize it or not).
So are you a fascist because you don't care if left-wing billionaires
force their personal agendas on you (whether you're too dumb to realize
it or not), or a national socialist or a Democratic Socialist?
Aren't you pro-choice?
<laugh> Suddenly the right-wing is "pro-choice" when it comes to >>>>>>>> vouchers.
<laugh> Suddenly the left-wing isn't "pro-choice" when it comes
to vouchers.
You have all the "choice" you want to send your kids to private
schools or homeschool them -- just do it on your own dime and not
to the detriment of public schools.
I did... but what about the working families whose kids attend
crappy schools because vouchers are unavailable?
What about upper middle class families who get vouchers when they
can easily afford to pay for a private education themselves?
Cite?
[crickets]
I thought you wingerdingers were against waste in goverment.
Like government schools? You bet!
No like doling out money to parents willy-nilly who may or may not use
it to educate their kids.
So you're unfamjiliar with the definition of 'voucher'. Ok.
Don't you want your kids to have the best education available?
I want everyone's kids to have the best education available, not >>>>>>>> just my own.
So you're a socialist-- you care less for your own kids than for >>>>>>> others'.
And you're a typical self-centered wingnut who has no problem
letting billionaires like the Kochs shove their personal ideology
down your throat just because they have the big bucks to do it.
And threaten lawmakers with their jobs if they don't acquiesce.
And you're a typical self-centered wingnut who has no problem
letting billionaires like Soros shove his personal ideology down
your throat just because he has the big bucks to do it, and
threaten lawmakers with their jobs if they don't acquiesce.
Show me an example of Soros giving money and then threatening
lawmakers if they don't abide by his wishes, asshole.
On 2024-04-05 20:27:47 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uugavg$32jej$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-04-01 01:57:34 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uucjcl$20od1$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-31 16:56:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uuapfj$1gufv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-30 14:49:27 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu559s$3toku$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-28 14:21:31 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu30t4$3d7la$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-28 04:22:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu285g$348lv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-27 18:39:17 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu1c4j$2t8t5$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Strange - you say State big government should get >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> involved but not National government!
Which is more responsive to its residents?
In my state they're more responsive to outside special >>>>>>>>>>>>> interest groups backed by billionaires like the Kochs, >>>>>>>>>>>>> like those who crammed a school voucher with public
funding program down their throats on the threat of
throwing a lot of money into campaigns to primary them.
Wow, public funding-- funds taken from the public
schools
Public schools don't generate funds, they consume funds... >>>>>>>>>> which come from taxpayers.
and used to pay for
private
schooling. Is that a problem?
It is to a lot of people, there's only so much money to go >>>>>>>>>>> around especially in a state that ranks 45th in education >>>>>>>>>>> spending.
Shouldn't they be spending those precious taxpayer moneys in >>>>>>>>>> the best manner possible?
Sure rob poor Peter to pay rich Paul, the Republican credo....
Yet it's the pinkies who want high school grads to pay off the >>>>>>>> student loans of college grads.
I don't happen to be for that myself, Jiminy Cricket.
Although many times students sign up for big college loans without
knowing what they've gotten themselves into, and there's no
incentive for the lenders to explain it to them because they're
making out like bandits.
... Most of those parents with kids in private schools are
already well off.
It's the parents of kids in crappy government schools who beg
for vouchers.
Cite, Jiminy Cricket?
https://nextstepsblog.org/2021/06/national-survey-shows-black-parents-
continue-to-support-education-choice/
No parents were "begging for vouchers" in my state, some outside
special interest group financed by the Kochs just horned their way
in and forced it on the politicians.
REVEALED: Secret recording shows pressure on Republican lawmakers to
vote for school vouchers
https://www.newschannel5.com/news/newschannel-5-investigates/revealed
/revealed-secret-recording-shows-pressure-on-republican-lawmakers-to-
vote-for-school-vouchers
If you want to send your kids to a private school or
homeschool yourself do it on your own dime.
How about the government letting me keep the portion of my
taxes that are spent on government schools so I can fund a
better choice?
If everyone wanted to "keep their portion of their taxes" and
spend it on "better choices" there wouldn't be any highways or
police or fire departments or anything else it takes to live in
a civilized society.
There aren't alternatives to government roads or fire
departments; there *are* alternatives to government schools.
Still doesn't give you the right to take money intended for public
schools away.
Shouldn't that money go to the best schooling available?
Not at the expense of public schools.
So you'd prefer inferior government schools be funded before superior
private schools. Ok.
And who are you to say private/homeschooling is automatically
better.
Who are you to say government schools are adequate?
https://news.gallup.com/poll/1612/education.aspx
Also there's no accountability how that public tax money is
spent....
That's the point-- government schools are inferior to the private
sector.
I was talking about the $7K or whatever amount it is they're
doling out to the private/homeschoolers, dweeb.
That's the point, dweeb--that tax money could be better spent on
non-government schooling.
... It could be spent on a trip to Vegas or expensive jewelry
...
Like Fani Willis?
? Try to stay on topic, silly goose.
You first.
...instead of your kid's education for all anyone knows (and it
probably is).
Parent are still responsible for educating their kids.
Is that clear enough for you to understand, Jiminy Cricket?
Yup. You're a statist.
And you're a fascist with no concern for the greater society.
BWAHAHAHAHAhahahahahahaha... now I'm a fascist because I want
better schools.
No you're a fascist because you don't care if right-wing
billionaires force their personal agendas on you (whether you're too
dumb to realize it or not).
So are you a fascist because you don't care if left-wing billionaires
force their personal agendas on you (whether you're too dumb to
realize it or not), or a national socialist or a Democratic
Socialist?
"Neener neener." Any money from progressive billionaires is going to
slow down the steady march by the American right to a full-blown authoritarian dictatorship.
Aren't you pro-choice?
<laugh> Suddenly the right-wing is "pro-choice" when it comes >>>>>>>>> to vouchers.
<laugh> Suddenly the left-wing isn't "pro-choice" when it comes >>>>>>>> to vouchers.
You have all the "choice" you want to send your kids to private
schools or homeschool them -- just do it on your own dime and
not to the detriment of public schools.
I did... but what about the working families whose kids attend
crappy schools because vouchers are unavailable?
What about upper middle class families who get vouchers when they
can easily afford to pay for a private education themselves?
Cite?
[crickets]
https://apnews.com/article/school-vouchers-scholarships-budget-cost-enr ollment-20a819f087af0cb1ed5a60ec24cc8216
In some states, higher-income families can now use taxpayer money to
cover private school tuition -- and more people than projected are
taking the offer, which might force scrambles to shore up state
budgets.
It's especially an issue in states like Arizona and Iowa, where at
least some families whose children were already in private school can
now take advantage of public funding.
"It busts the budget because it's taking on as a public expense what's previously been a private cost," said Josh Cowen, an education policy professor at Michigan State University.
https://www.propublica.org/article/private-schools-vouchers-parents-ohi o-public-funds
Private Schools, Public Money: School Leaders Are Pushing Parents to
Exploit Voucher Programs
Voucher expansions have unleashed a flood of additional taxpayer
dollars to the benefit of families already enrolled in private
schools. In Ohio, some schools are now "strongly encouraging" parents
to apply for vouchers, regardless of need or income.
For years the [Ohio] program, EdChoice, targeted mostly lower-income
students in struggling school districts. Now it is an entitlement
available to all, with its value decreasing for families with higher
incomes but still providing more than $7,000 annually for high school students in solidly middle-class families and close to $1,000 for ones
in the wealthiest families. Demand for EdChoice vouchers has nearly
doubled this year, at a cost to Ohio taxpayers of several hundred
million additional dollars, the final tally of which won't be known
for months.
...But much of the demand for the expanded voucher programs is in fact
coming from families, many quite affluent, whose children were already attending private schools. In Arizona, the first state to allow any
family to receive public funding for private schools or homeschooling,
the majority of families applying for the money, about $7,000 per
student, were not recently enrolled in public school. In Florida, only
13% of the 123,000 students added to the state's expanded
school-choice program had switched from public school.
Looks like your head is exploded now, Max.
On 2024-04-05 20:27:47 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uugavg$32jej$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-04-01 01:57:34 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uucjcl$20od1$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-31 16:56:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uuapfj$1gufv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-30 14:49:27 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu559s$3toku$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-28 14:21:31 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu30t4$3d7la$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-28 04:22:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu285g$348lv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-27 18:39:17 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu1c4j$2t8t5$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Strange - you say State big government should get involved >>>>>>>>>>>>>> but not National government!
Which is more responsive to its residents?
In my state they're more responsive to outside special >>>>>>>>>>>> interest groups backed by billionaires like the Kochs, like >>>>>>>>>>>> those who crammed a school voucher with public funding >>>>>>>>>>>> program down their throats on the threat of throwing a lot >>>>>>>>>>>> of money into campaigns to primary them.
Wow, public funding-- funds taken from the public
schools
Public schools don't generate funds, they consume funds... >>>>>>>>> which come from taxpayers.
and used to pay for
private
schooling. Is that a problem?
It is to a lot of people, there's only so much money to go >>>>>>>>>> around especially in a state that ranks 45th in education >>>>>>>>>> spending.
Shouldn't they be spending those precious taxpayer moneys in >>>>>>>>> the best manner possible?
Sure rob poor Peter to pay rich Paul, the Republican credo....
Yet it's the pinkies who want high school grads to pay off the >>>>>>> student loans of college grads.
I don't happen to be for that myself, Jiminy Cricket.
Although many times students sign up for big college loans without
knowing what they've gotten themselves into, and there's no incentive
for the lenders to explain it to them because they're making out like
bandits.
... Most of those parents with kids in private schools are
already well off.
It's the parents of kids in crappy government schools who beg for >>>>>>> vouchers.
Cite, Jiminy Cricket?
https://nextstepsblog.org/2021/06/national-survey-shows-black-parents-continue-to-support-education-choice/
No parents were "begging for vouchers" in my state, some outside
special interest group financed by the Kochs just horned their way in
and forced it on the politicians.
REVEALED: Secret recording shows pressure on Republican lawmakers to
vote for school vouchers
https://www.newschannel5.com/news/newschannel-5-investigates/revealed/revealed-secret-recording-shows-pressure-on-republican-lawmakers-to-vote-for-school-vouchers
If you want to send your kids to a private school or homeschool >>>>>>>> yourself do it on your own dime.
How about the government letting me keep the portion of my taxes >>>>>>> that are spent on government schools so I can fund a better
choice?
If everyone wanted to "keep their portion of their taxes" and
spend it on "better choices" there wouldn't be any highways or
police or fire departments or anything else it takes to live in a >>>>>> civilized society.
There aren't alternatives to government roads or fire departments; >>>>> there *are* alternatives to government schools.
Still doesn't give you the right to take money intended for public
schools away.
Shouldn't that money go to the best schooling available?
Not at the expense of public schools.
So you'd prefer inferior government schools be funded before superior private schools. Ok.
And who are you to say private/homeschooling is automatically better.
Who are you to say government schools are adequate?
https://news.gallup.com/poll/1612/education.aspx
Also there's no accountability how that public tax money is
spent....
That's the point-- government schools are inferior to the private
sector.
I was talking about the $7K or whatever amount it is they're doling
out to the private/homeschoolers, dweeb.
That's the point, dweeb--that tax money could be better spent on
non-government schooling.
... It could be spent on a trip to Vegas or expensive jewelry ...
Like Fani Willis?
? Try to stay on topic, silly goose.
You first.
...instead of your kid's education for all anyone knows (and it
probably is).
Parent are still responsible for educating their kids.
Is that clear enough for you to understand, Jiminy Cricket?
Yup. You're a statist.
And you're a fascist with no concern for the greater society.
BWAHAHAHAHAhahahahahahaha... now I'm a fascist because I want better
schools.
No you're a fascist because you don't care if right-wing billionaires
force their personal agendas on you (whether you're too dumb to
realize it or not).
So are you a fascist because you don't care if left-wing billionaires
force their personal agendas on you (whether you're too dumb to realize
it or not), or a national socialist or a Democratic Socialist?
"Neener neener." Any money from progressive billionaires is going to
slow down the steady march by the American right to a full-blown authoritarian dictatorship.
Aren't you pro-choice?
<laugh> Suddenly the right-wing is "pro-choice" when it comes to >>>>>>>> vouchers.
<laugh> Suddenly the left-wing isn't "pro-choice" when it comes >>>>>>> to vouchers.
You have all the "choice" you want to send your kids to private
schools or homeschool them -- just do it on your own dime and not >>>>>> to the detriment of public schools.
I did... but what about the working families whose kids attend
crappy schools because vouchers are unavailable?
What about upper middle class families who get vouchers when they
can easily afford to pay for a private education themselves?
Cite?
[crickets]
https://apnews.com/article/school-vouchers-scholarships-budget-cost-enrollment-20a819f087af0cb1ed5a60ec24cc8216
In some states, higher-income families can now use taxpayer money to
cover private school tuition -- and more people than projected are
taking the offer, which might force scrambles to shore up state budgets.
It's especially an issue in states like Arizona and Iowa, where at
least some families whose children were already in private school can
now take advantage of public funding.
"It busts the budget because it's taking on as a public expense what's previously been a private cost," said Josh Cowen, an education policy professor at Michigan State University.
https://www.propublica.org/article/private-schools-vouchers-parents-ohio-public-funds
Private Schools, Public Money: School Leaders Are Pushing Parents to
Exploit Voucher Programs
Voucher expansions have unleashed a flood of additional taxpayer
dollars to the benefit of families already enrolled in private schools.
In Ohio, some schools are now "strongly encouraging" parents to apply
for vouchers, regardless of need or income.
For years the [Ohio] program, EdChoice, targeted mostly lower-income
students in struggling school districts. Now it is an entitlement
available to all, with its value decreasing for families with higher
incomes but still providing more than $7,000 annually for high school students in solidly middle-class families and close to $1,000 for ones
in the wealthiest families. Demand for EdChoice vouchers has nearly
doubled this year, at a cost to Ohio taxpayers of several hundred
million additional dollars, the final tally of which won't be known for months.
...But much of the demand for the expanded voucher programs is in fact
coming from families, many quite affluent, whose children were already attending private schools. In Arizona, the first state to allow any
family to receive public funding for private schools or homeschooling,
the majority of families applying for the money, about $7,000 per
student, were not recently enrolled in public school. In Florida, only
13% of the 123,000 students added to the state's expanded school-choice program had switched from public school.
Looks like your head is exploded now, Max.
I thought you wingerdingers were against waste in goverment.
Like government schools? You bet!
No like doling out money to parents willy-nilly who may or may not use
it to educate their kids.
So you're unfamjiliar with the definition of 'voucher'. Ok.
No you're a naive dumbass, as we can all see....
"Even in the states with enrollment over projections, it's early enough
in the school year that the situation is still rife with unknowns,
including how many of the families approved for scholarships will use
them, how much that will cost, and what lawmakers will propose to do
about it."
Don't you want your kids to have the best education available?
I want everyone's kids to have the best education available, not >>>>>>>> just my own.
So you're a socialist-- you care less for your own kids than for >>>>>>> others'.
And you're a typical self-centered wingnut who has no problem
letting billionaires like the Kochs shove their personal ideology >>>>>> down your throat just because they have the big bucks to do it.
And threaten lawmakers with their jobs if they don't acquiesce.
And you're a typical self-centered wingnut who has no problem
letting billionaires like Soros shove his personal ideology down
your throat just because he has the big bucks to do it, and
threaten lawmakers with their jobs if they don't acquiesce.
Show me an example of Soros giving money and then threatening
lawmakers if they don't abide by his wishes, asshole.
[crickets]
On 2024-04-05 20:27:47 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uugavg$32jej$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-04-01 01:57:34 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uucjcl$20od1$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-31 16:56:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uuapfj$1gufv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-30 14:49:27 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu559s$3toku$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-28 14:21:31 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu30t4$3d7la$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-28 04:22:03 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu285g$348lv$1@dont-email.me, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> typed:
On 2024-03-27 18:39:17 +0000, max headroom said:
In news:uu1c4j$2t8t5$2@dont-email.me, Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Strange - you say State big government should get >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> involved but not National government!
Which is more responsive to its residents?
In my state they're more responsive to outside special >>>>>>>>>>>>> interest groups backed by billionaires like the Kochs, >>>>>>>>>>>>> like those who crammed a school voucher with public
funding program down their throats on the threat of
throwing a lot of money into campaigns to primary them.
Wow, public funding-- funds taken from the public
schools
Public schools don't generate funds, they consume funds... >>>>>>>>>> which come from taxpayers.
and used to pay for
private
schooling. Is that a problem?
It is to a lot of people, there's only so much money to go >>>>>>>>>>> around especially in a state that ranks 45th in education >>>>>>>>>>> spending.
Shouldn't they be spending those precious taxpayer moneys in >>>>>>>>>> the best manner possible?
Sure rob poor Peter to pay rich Paul, the Republican credo....
Yet it's the pinkies who want high school grads to pay off the >>>>>>>> student loans of college grads.
I don't happen to be for that myself, Jiminy Cricket.
Although many times students sign up for big college loans without
knowing what they've gotten themselves into, and there's no
incentive for the lenders to explain it to them because they're
making out like bandits.
... Most of those parents with kids in private schools are
already well off.
It's the parents of kids in crappy government schools who beg
for vouchers.
Cite, Jiminy Cricket?
https://nextstepsblog.org/2021/06/national-survey-shows-black-parents-continue-to-support-education-choice/
No parents were "begging for vouchers" in my state, some outside
special interest group financed by the Kochs just horned their way
in and forced it on the politicians.
REVEALED: Secret recording shows pressure on Republican lawmakers to
vote for school vouchers
https://www.newschannel5.com/news/newschannel-5-investigates/revealed/revealed-secret-recording-shows-pressure-on-republican-lawmakers-to-vote-for-school-vouchers
If you want to send your kids to a private school or
homeschool yourself do it on your own dime.
How about the government letting me keep the portion of my
taxes that are spent on government schools so I can fund a
better choice?
If everyone wanted to "keep their portion of their taxes" and
spend it on "better choices" there wouldn't be any highways or
police or fire departments or anything else it takes to live in
a civilized society.
There aren't alternatives to government roads or fire
departments; there *are* alternatives to government schools.
Still doesn't give you the right to take money intended for public
schools away.
Shouldn't that money go to the best schooling available?
Not at the expense of public schools.
So you'd prefer inferior government schools be funded before superior
private schools. Ok.
And who are you to say private/homeschooling is automatically
better.
Who are you to say government schools are adequate?
https://news.gallup.com/poll/1612/education.aspx
Also there's no accountability how that public tax money is
spent....
That's the point-- government schools are inferior to the private
sector.
I was talking about the $7K or whatever amount it is they're
doling out to the private/homeschoolers, dweeb.
That's the point, dweeb--that tax money could be better spent on
non-government schooling.
... It could be spent on a trip to Vegas or expensive jewelry...
Like Fani Willis?
? Try to stay on topic, silly goose.
You first.
...instead of your kid's education for all anyone knows (and it
probably is).
Parent are still responsible for educating their kids.
Is that clear enough for you to understand, Jiminy Cricket?
Yup. You're a statist.
And you're a fascist with no concern for the greater society.
BWAHAHAHAHAhahahahahahaha... now I'm a fascist because I want
better schools.
No you're a fascist because you don't care if right-wing
billionaires force their personal agendas on you (whether you're
too dumb to realize it or not).
So are you a fascist because you don't care if left-wing billionaires
force their personal agendas on you (whether you're too dumb to
realize it or not), or a national socialist or a Democratic
Socialist?
"Neener neener." Any money from progressive billionaires is going to
slow down the steady march by the American right to a full-blown authoritarian dictatorship.
Aren't you pro-choice?
<laugh> Suddenly the right-wing is "pro-choice" when it comes >>>>>>>>> to vouchers.
<laugh> Suddenly the left-wing isn't "pro-choice" when it comes >>>>>>>> to vouchers.
You have all the "choice" you want to send your kids to private
schools or homeschool them -- just do it on your own dime and
not to the detriment of public schools.
I did... but what about the working families whose kids attend
crappy schools because vouchers are unavailable?
What about upper middle class families who get vouchers when they
can easily afford to pay for a private education themselves?
https://apnews.com/article/school-vouchers-scholarships-budget-cost-enrollment-20a819f087af0cb1ed5a60ec24cc8216
In some states, higher-income families can now use taxpayer money to
cover private school tuition ...
Private Schools, Public Money: School Leaders Are Pushing Parents to
Exploit Voucher Programs...
Looks like your head is exploded now, Max.
I thought you wingerdingers were against waste in goverment.
Like government schools? You bet!
No like doling out money to parents willy-nilly who may or may not
use it to educate their kids.
So you're unfamjiliar with the definition of 'voucher'. Ok.
No you're a naive dumbass, as we can all see....
"Even in the states with enrollment over projections, it's early
enough in the school year that the situation is still rife with
unknowns, including how many of the families approved for
scholarships will use them, how much that will cost, and what
lawmakers will propose to do about it."
Don't you want your kids to have the best education
available?
I want everyone's kids to have the best education available, >>>>>>>>> not just my own.
So you're a socialist-- you care less for your own kids than
for others'.
And you're a typical self-centered wingnut who has no problem
letting billionaires like the Kochs shove their personal
ideology down your throat just because they have the big bucks
to do it. And threaten lawmakers with their jobs if they don't
acquiesce.
And you're a typical self-centered wingnut who has no problem
letting billionaires like Soros shove his personal ideology down
your throat just because he has the big bucks to do it, and
threaten lawmakers with their jobs if they don't acquiesce.
Show me an example of Soros giving money and then threatening
lawmakers if they don't abide by his wishes, asshole.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 58:08:44 |
| Calls: | 6,712 |
| Files: | 12,243 |
| Messages: | 5,355,629 |