On Mar 19, 2024 at 2:35:00 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:

On 3/17/24 4:52 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <ut6vuf$3iqos$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:

On 3/16/24 1:43 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <ut4cba$2ur4t$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:

On 3/15/24 1:30 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <OITIN.11937$_a1e.2838@fx16.iad>,
trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:

That's interesting. If you rob a liquor store you've done something >>>>>>> illegal.

And if you cross the U.S. border without authorization, you've done >>>>>> something illegal.

Do you really need this explained to you?

I don't what the flying fuck "legal status" means though, as
if you've done something "illegal" just by existing in a place. It's >>>>>>> meaningless whereas "undocumented" isn't, and you can be deported for >>>>>>> being undocumented. I get that verbal vomit is all you have to go with >>>>>>> though. "Undocumented bullshit" might be a way to describe what you're >>>>>>> saying.

The United States Code uses the term illegal alien and defines it under >>>>>> U.S. law, Hutt. It doesn't use this 'undocumented' shit or 'pre-citizen'
as Gavin Newsom likes to call them.

Crossing the border to request asylum is perfectly legal.

Only if it's the first country the person comes to and it's done at a >>>> valid port of entry. Crossing five different countries to get to the
U.S., then sneaking across the river in the dead of night and only
requesting asylum when caught is not legal, perfect or otherwise.

Nope.

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Biden administration said on Saturday it was >>>> immediately suspending Trump-era asylum agreements with El Salvador,
Guatemala and Honduras, part of a bid to undo his Republican predecessor's
hardline immigration policies.

Oh, look! Another of those EOs that Biden issued facilitating illegal
alien entry and causing the chaos at the border.

But we're supposed to believe the Effas of the world when they cry it's
"the bill! the bill! the bill!" that's the cause of it all.

The so-called "safe third country" agreements, inked in 2019 by the Trump >>>> administration and the Central American nations, force asylum seekers from
the region to first seek refuge in those countries before applying in the >>>> United States.

So when you said it was 'perfectly legal', you meant Biden had just
legalized the chaos by EO.

Gotcha. That makes it soooo much better. (Although it does highlight how
absolutely full of shit Democrats are when they claim they want a secure
border and then do shit like this which is 100% guaranteed to make it
less secure.)

Good. Now why don't you apologize for lying and insinuating EO's are something illegal, unconstitutional, or even unusual.

I will not because I did not. Although one wonders how Biden countermanded the safe third country requirement of the law with a mere EO, which was
promulgated by Congress pursuant to treaty. Presidents can't change or negate statutes with EOs.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)