In article <usqlg5$hnqa$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 3/12/24 5:56 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <Ubp4av$666q$10@dont-email.me>,
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
President Joe Biden ignited widespread backlash over the weekend after >>>> he apologized for correctly referring to the illegal alien who is
suspected of murdering a young woman in Georgia as "an illegal" because >>>> he did not want to "disrespect" illegal immigrants.
It certainly was appalling to see the president of the United States
apologizing to an illegal alien rapist-murderer for hurting his feelings >>> while not even being able to correctly remember the name of his American >>> victim.
Gosh, I fully understand why using a word would throw you into a full
pearl-clutching incident.
Your insults don't even make any logical sense. I use the word 'illegal'
all the time to refer to those who enter this country contrary to law.
Why would I object to Biden doing it?
No, I'm not the one running for the smelling salts over Biden's use of
the world 'illegal', Shit-Shoes. The Leftist media and grievance groups
are.
Did you hear there's this other guy running for president who wants to
(and you need to be sitting down before you read any further)... but
there's a presidential candidate who wants to release hundreds of
violent criminals back into society. No, Really!!!
Just one of the reasons I'm not voting for president in the upcoming election. I can't stand either one of them.
In article <usqnfm$i5pq$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 3/12/24 7:01 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <usqlg5$hnqa$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 3/12/24 5:56 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <Ubp4av$666q$10@dont-email.me>,
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
President Joe Biden ignited widespread backlash over the weekend after >>>>>> he apologized for correctly referring to the illegal alien who is
suspected of murdering a young woman in Georgia as "an illegal" because >>>>>> he did not want to "disrespect" illegal immigrants.
It certainly was appalling to see the president of the United States >>>>> apologizing to an illegal alien rapist-murderer for hurting his feelings >>>>> while not even being able to correctly remember the name of his American >>>>> victim.
Gosh, I fully understand why using a word would throw you into a full
pearl-clutching incident.
Your insults don't even make any logical sense. I use the word 'illegal' >>> all the time to refer to those who enter this country contrary to law.
Why would I object to Biden doing it?
No, I'm not the one running for the smelling salts over Biden's use of
the world 'illegal', Shit-Shoes. The Leftist media and grievance groups
are.
No, you're running for the smelling salts over the word "undocumented",
which is more accurate.
The hell it is. Illegal alien describes their legal status
clearly than "undocumented" and more to the point, it's how the U.S.
Code refers to them.
But hey, did you know that the 'progressive' grievance groups now claim
that even undocumented is stigmatizing and bigoted? Yep, welcome to the
club, you filthy racist.
Ever the trailblazer, Gavin Newsom rides the curl of the 'progressive'
wave by saying the quiet part out loud, referring to them as
'pre-citizens'. And on not a few occasions, he's simply called them Americans, completely erasing any distinction of citizenship whatsoever.
But only because it doesn't slur a whole group of people, and you don't
have any cover for your racism.
How does illegal alien "slur a whole group of people", Shit-Shoes?
Thrill us with your acumen.
In article <usqnfm$i5pq$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 3/12/24 7:01 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <usqlg5$hnqa$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 3/12/24 5:56 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <Ubp4av$666q$10@dont-email.me>,
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
President Joe Biden ignited widespread backlash over the weekend after >>>>>> he apologized for correctly referring to the illegal alien who is
suspected of murdering a young woman in Georgia as "an illegal" because >>>>>> he did not want to "disrespect" illegal immigrants.
It certainly was appalling to see the president of the United States >>>>> apologizing to an illegal alien rapist-murderer for hurting his feelings >>>>> while not even being able to correctly remember the name of his American >>>>> victim.
Gosh, I fully understand why using a word would throw you into a full
pearl-clutching incident.
Your insults don't even make any logical sense. I use the word 'illegal' >>> all the time to refer to those who enter this country contrary to law.
Why would I object to Biden doing it?
No, I'm not the one running for the smelling salts over Biden's use of
the world 'illegal', Shit-Shoes. The Leftist media and grievance groups
are.
No, you're running for the smelling salts over the word "undocumented",
which is more accurate.
The hell it is. Illegal alien describes their legal status a lot more
clearly than "undocumented" and more to the point, it's how the U.S.
Code refers to them.
But hey, did you know that the 'progressive' grievance groups now claim
that even undocumented is stigmatizing and bigoted? Yep, welcome to the
club, you filthy racist.
Ever the trailblazer, Gavin Newsom rides the curl of the 'progressive'
wave by saying the quiet part out loud, referring to them as
'pre-citizens'. And on not a few occasions, he's simply called them Americans, completely erasing any distinction of citizenship whatsoever.
But only because it doesn't slur a whole group of people, and you don't
have any cover for your racism.
How does illegal alien "slur a whole group of people", Shit-Shoes?
Thrill us with your acumen.
On 3/15/24 1:30 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <OITIN.11937$_a1e.2838@fx16.iad>,
trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
On 3/12/24 6:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <usqnfm$i5pq$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 3/12/24 7:01 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <usqlg5$hnqa$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote:
On 3/12/24 5:56 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <Ubp4av$666q$10@dont-email.me>,
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
President Joe Biden ignited widespread backlash over the
weekend after
he apologized for correctly referring to the illegal alien who is >>>>>>>>> suspected of murdering a young woman in Georgia as "an illegal" >>>>>>>>> because
he did not want to "disrespect" illegal immigrants.
It certainly was appalling to see the president of the United
States
apologizing to an illegal alien rapist-murderer for hurting his >>>>>>>> feelings
while not even being able to correctly remember the name of his >>>>>>>> American
victim.
Gosh, I fully understand why using a word would throw you into a >>>>>>> full
pearl-clutching incident.
Your insults don't even make any logical sense. I use the word
'illegal'
all the time to refer to those who enter this country contrary to
law.
Why would I object to Biden doing it?
No, I'm not the one running for the smelling salts over Biden's
use of
the world 'illegal', Shit-Shoes. The Leftist media and grievance
groups
are.
No, you're running for the smelling salts over the word
"undocumented",
which is more accurate.
The hell it is. Illegal alien describes their legal status
That's interesting. If you rob a liquor store you've done something
illegal.
And if you cross the U.S. border without authorization, you've done
something illegal.
Do you really need this explained to you?
I don't what the flying fuck "legal status" means though, as
if you've done something "illegal" just by existing in a place. It's
meaningless whereas "undocumented" isn't, and you can be deported for
being undocumented. I get that verbal vomit is all you have to go with
though. "Undocumented bullshit" might be a way to describe what you're
saying.
The United States Code uses the term illegal alien and defines it under
U.S. law, Hutt. It doesn't use this 'undocumented' shit or 'pre-citizen'
as Gavin Newsom likes to call them.
Crossing the border to request asylum is perfectly legal. That's what
the vast majority of people at the border are doing.
Most arriving at the border are requesting asylum. You're fear
mongering isn't working.
In article <ut4cba$2ur4t$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 3/15/24 1:30 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <OITIN.11937$_a1e.2838@fx16.iad>,
trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
On 3/12/24 6:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <usqnfm$i5pq$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
Crossing the border to request asylum is perfectly legal.No, I'm not the one running for the smelling salts over Biden's use of >>>>>>> the world 'illegal', Shit-Shoes. The Leftist media and grievance groups >>>>>>> are.
No, you're running for the smelling salts over the word "undocumented", >>>>>> which is more accurate.
The hell it is. Illegal alien describes their legal status
That's interesting. If you rob a liquor store you've done something
illegal.
And if you cross the U.S. border without authorization, you've done
something illegal.
Do you really need this explained to you?
I don't what the flying fuck "legal status" means though, as
if you've done something "illegal" just by existing in a place. It's
meaningless whereas "undocumented" isn't, and you can be deported for
being undocumented. I get that verbal vomit is all you have to go with >>>> though. "Undocumented bullshit" might be a way to describe what you're >>>> saying.
The United States Code uses the term illegal alien and defines it under
U.S. law, Hutt. It doesn't use this 'undocumented' shit or 'pre-citizen' >>> as Gavin Newsom likes to call them.
Only if it's the first country the person comes to and it's done at a
valid port of entry. Crossing five different countries to get to the
U.S., then sneaking across the river in the dead of night and only
requesting asylum when caught is not legal, perfect or otherwise.
On 3/17/24 3:11 PM, trotsky wrote:
On 3/16/24 12:43 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <ut4cba$2ur4t$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 3/15/24 1:30 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <OITIN.11937$_a1e.2838@fx16.iad>,
trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
On 3/12/24 6:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <usqnfm$i5pq$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote:
Crossing the border to request asylum is perfectly legal.No, I'm not the one running for the smelling salts over Biden's >>>>>>>>> use of
the world 'illegal', Shit-Shoes. The Leftist media and
grievance groups
are.
No, you're running for the smelling salts over the word
"undocumented",
which is more accurate.
The hell it is. Illegal alien describes their legal status
That's interesting. If you rob a liquor store you've done something >>>>>> illegal.
And if you cross the U.S. border without authorization, you've done
something illegal.
Do you really need this explained to you?
I don't what the flying fuck "legal status" means though, as
if you've done something "illegal" just by existing in a place. It's >>>>>> meaningless whereas "undocumented" isn't, and you can be deported for >>>>>> being undocumented. I get that verbal vomit is all you have to go
with
though. "Undocumented bullshit" might be a way to describe what
you're
saying.
The United States Code uses the term illegal alien and defines it
under
U.S. law, Hutt. It doesn't use this 'undocumented' shit or
'pre-citizen'
as Gavin Newsom likes to call them.
Only if it's the first country the person comes to and it's done at a
valid port of entry. Crossing five different countries to get to the
U.S., then sneaking across the river in the dead of night and only
requesting asylum when caught is not legal, perfect or otherwise.
Cite?
It's obviously in the "no sneaking clause", paragraph 2.
On 3/17/24 3:11 PM, trotsky wrote:
On 3/16/24 12:43 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <ut4cba$2ur4t$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 3/15/24 1:30 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <OITIN.11937$_a1e.2838@fx16.iad>,
trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
On 3/12/24 6:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <usqnfm$i5pq$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote:
Crossing the border to request asylum is perfectly legal.No, I'm not the one running for the smelling salts over Biden's >>>>>>>>> use of
the world 'illegal', Shit-Shoes. The Leftist media and
grievance groups
are.
No, you're running for the smelling salts over the word
"undocumented",
which is more accurate.
The hell it is. Illegal alien describes their legal status
That's interesting. If you rob a liquor store you've done something >>>>>> illegal.
And if you cross the U.S. border without authorization, you've done
something illegal.
Do you really need this explained to you?
I don't what the flying fuck "legal status" means though, as
if you've done something "illegal" just by existing in a place. It's >>>>>> meaningless whereas "undocumented" isn't, and you can be deported for >>>>>> being undocumented. I get that verbal vomit is all you have to go
with
though. "Undocumented bullshit" might be a way to describe what
you're
saying.
The United States Code uses the term illegal alien and defines it
under
U.S. law, Hutt. It doesn't use this 'undocumented' shit or
'pre-citizen'
as Gavin Newsom likes to call them.
Only if it's the first country the person comes to and it's done at a
valid port of entry. Crossing five different countries to get to the
U.S., then sneaking across the river in the dead of night and only
requesting asylum when caught is not legal, perfect or otherwise.
Cite?
It's obviously in the "no sneaking clause", paragraph 2.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 58:02:20 |
| Calls: | 6,712 |
| Files: | 12,243 |
| Messages: | 5,355,629 |