• Republican response by Katie Britt

    From Adam H. Kerman@21:1/5 to All on Fri Mar 8 19:49:10 2024
    I heard a bit of the Republican response to the Biden state of the union address by Katie Britt.

    I found it impossible to believe that someone that young was in the US
    Senate, a place where very very old white dudes go to die. I had to look
    her up to make sure she's not in the Alabama state legislature.

    She looks like a former high school cheerleader, and she looks a good
    decade younger than she actually is. I'm looking for a cheerleading
    picture with her but haven't found it.

    She won the election in 2022, succeeding Richard Shelby. She'd been on
    his political and legislative staff at various times and was rising
    through the ranks of various civic groups and government positions in
    Alabama. US Senator was the first election she ran in.

    She ran against Mo Brooks, six-term House member from Alabama. Brooks
    ran for Senate in lieu of running for another term.

    Both are Trump supporters. Brooks is so conservative, he's a founding
    member of the House Freedom Caucus. Britt is quite a religious
    conservative.

    What's the difference? Britt endorsed Trump's lies about having been
    re-elected in 2020. Brooks would not endorse all of Trump's lies, but he
    did sign an amicus brief in favor of Trump in one of the lawsuits
    contesting the election, Texas v. Pennsylvania. The case went no where
    for Texas's lack of standing. Brooks even endorsed some of the unfounded
    claims of fraud. But by March 2022, Brooks said the law doesn't permit
    him to work to remove Biden in order to install Trump.

    Trump withdrew his endorsement and Brooks could not get elected Senator.

    The Trump loyalty test has no end limit, it seems.

    Britt has got to be the most attractive Senator I've ever seen.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rhino@21:1/5 to Adam H. Kerman on Fri Mar 8 18:48:26 2024
    On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 19:49:10 -0000 (UTC)
    "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

    I heard a bit of the Republican response to the Biden state of the
    union address by Katie Britt.

    I found it impossible to believe that someone that young was in the US Senate, a place where very very old white dudes go to die. I had to
    look her up to make sure she's not in the Alabama state legislature.

    She looks like a former high school cheerleader, and she looks a good
    decade younger than she actually is. I'm looking for a cheerleading
    picture with her but haven't found it.

    Wikipedia says she was indeed a cheerleader in high school.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katie_Britt

    She won the election in 2022, succeeding Richard Shelby. She'd been on
    his political and legislative staff at various times and was rising
    through the ranks of various civic groups and government positions in Alabama. US Senator was the first election she ran in.

    She ran against Mo Brooks, six-term House member from Alabama. Brooks
    ran for Senate in lieu of running for another term.

    Both are Trump supporters. Brooks is so conservative, he's a founding
    member of the House Freedom Caucus. Britt is quite a religious
    conservative.

    What's the difference? Britt endorsed Trump's lies about having been re-elected in 2020. Brooks would not endorse all of Trump's lies, but
    he did sign an amicus brief in favor of Trump in one of the lawsuits contesting the election, Texas v. Pennsylvania. The case went no where
    for Texas's lack of standing. Brooks even endorsed some of the
    unfounded claims of fraud. But by March 2022, Brooks said the law
    doesn't permit him to work to remove Biden in order to install Trump.

    Trump withdrew his endorsement and Brooks could not get elected
    Senator.

    The Trump loyalty test has no end limit, it seems.

    Britt has got to be the most attractive Senator I've ever seen.



    --
    Rhino

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From super70s@21:1/5 to All on Fri Mar 8 19:05:13 2024
    Such gloom and doom. She should've started off with "It was a dark and
    stormy night..."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From super70s@21:1/5 to All on Fri Mar 8 22:32:25 2024
    In article <usgdtq$2079n$5@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 3/8/24 8:05 PM, super70s wrote:
    Such gloom and doom. She should've started off with "It was a dark and stormy night..."



    Somewhere, a High School drama coach is VERY proud.

    She chewed all the scenery in that kitchen, lol.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From trotsky@21:1/5 to FPP on Sat Mar 9 05:48:15 2024
    On 3/8/24 7:27 PM, FPP wrote:
    On 3/8/24 8:05 PM, super70s wrote:
    Such gloom and doom. She should've started off with "It was a dark and
    stormy night..."



    Somewhere, a High School drama coach is VERY proud.


    I just don't know why she
    didn't appear in that kitchen as barefoot and pregnant.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)