https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/after-nex-benedicts-death-lgbtq-oklahomans-vow-to-not-let-the-hate-take-over
After Nex Benedict’s death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to ‘not let the hate take over’
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans. This non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died from his injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the country from
this but only one political party will have the balls to talk about it.
On Feb 26, 2024 at 1:05:42 AM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/after-nex-benedicts-death-lgbtq-oklahomans-vow-to-not-let-the-hate-take-over
After Nex Benedict’s death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to ‘not let the hate >> take over’
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans. This
non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died from his
injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the country from
this but only one political party will have the balls to talk about it.
Oh, Hutt, where were you when a high school girl in Loudoun County, VA was violently raped in her high school restroom by a troon boy wearing dress because leftists thought it was a good idea to let boys into girls' restrooms?
(And then the high school admin tried to cover it up and had the girl's father
arrested for trying to expose the whole vile incident at a school board meeting.)
You don't seem to care about kids being violently attacked by other kids if you can't point one of your grotesque claws at it and screech "Republicans!"
On 2/26/2024 1:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Feb 26, 2024 at 1:05:42 AM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com>
wrote:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/after-nex-benedicts-death-lgbtq-oklahomans-vow-to-not-let-the-hate-take-over
After Nex Benedict’s death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to ‘not let the
hate take over’
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans.
This non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died
from his injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the
country from this but only one political party will have the balls
to talk about it.
Oh, Hutt, where were you when a high school girl in Loudoun County,
VA was violently raped in her high school restroom by a troon boy
wearing dress because leftists thought it was a good idea to let
boys into girls' restrooms? (And then the high school admin tried
to cover it up and had the girl's father arrested for trying to
expose the whole vile incident at a school board meeting.)
You don't seem to care about kids being violently attacked by other
kids if you can't point one of your grotesque claws at it and
screech "Republicans!"
Rape-prevention should in no way depend on keeping restrooms
segregated.
On 2/26/2024 1:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Feb 26, 2024 at 1:05:42 AM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans. This
non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died from his
injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the country from
this but only one political party will have the balls to talk about it.
Oh, Hutt, where were you when a high school girl in Loudoun County, VA was >> violently raped in her high school restroom by a troon boy wearing dress
because leftists thought it was a good idea to let boys into girls'
restrooms?
(And then the high school admin tried to cover it up and had the girl's
father arrested for trying to expose the whole vile incident at a school
board meeting.)
You don't seem to care about kids being violently attacked by other kids
if you can't point one of your grotesque claws at it and screech
"Republicans!"
Rape-prevention should in no way depend on keeping restrooms segregated.
After Nex Benedict's death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to ‘not let the hate
take over’
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans.
On 2/26/2024 1:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Feb 26, 2024 at 1:05:42 AM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/after-nex-benedicts-death-lgbtq-oklahomans-vow-to-not-let-the-hate-take-over
After Nex Benedict’s death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to ‘not let the hate >>> take over’
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans. This
non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died from his
injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the country from
this but only one political party will have the balls to talk about it.
Oh, Hutt, where were you when a high school girl in Loudoun County, VA
was
violently raped in her high school restroom by a troon boy wearing dress
because leftists thought it was a good idea to let boys into girls'
restrooms?
(And then the high school admin tried to cover it up and had the
girl's father
arrested for trying to expose the whole vile incident at a school board
meeting.)
You don't seem to care about kids being violently attacked by other
kids if
you can't point one of your grotesque claws at it and screech
"Republicans!"
Rape-prevention should in no way depend on keeping restrooms segregated.
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 14:22:07 -0500
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/26/2024 1:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:What's YOUR plan to keep men dressed as women from sexually assaulting
On Feb 26, 2024 at 1:05:42 AM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com>
wrote:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/after-nex-benedicts-death-lgbtq-oklahomans-vow-to-not-let-the-hate-take-over
After Nex Benedict’s death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to ‘not let the
hate take over’
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans.
This non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died
from his injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the
country from this but only one political party will have the balls
to talk about it.
Oh, Hutt, where were you when a high school girl in Loudoun County,
VA was violently raped in her high school restroom by a troon boy
wearing dress because leftists thought it was a good idea to let
boys into girls' restrooms? (And then the high school admin tried
to cover it up and had the girl's father arrested for trying to
expose the whole vile incident at a school board meeting.)
You don't seem to care about kids being violently attacked by other
kids if you can't point one of your grotesque claws at it and
screech "Republicans!"
Rape-prevention should in no way depend on keeping restrooms
segregated.
women? A pinky swear from the man that he'll never use his dick in a non-consensual way? Security guards between the real women and the pretend-women? Or the usual leftist way: pretend it'll never happen,
then deny that it happened when it does?
On 2/26/2024 10:56 PM, Rhino wrote:
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 14:22:07 -0500
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/26/2024 1:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:What's YOUR plan to keep men dressed as women from sexually assaulting
On Feb 26, 2024 at 1:05:42 AM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com>
wrote:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/after-nex-benedicts-death-lgbtq-oklahomans-vow-to-not-let-the-hate-take-over
After Nex Benedict’s death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to ‘not let the >>>>> hate take over’
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans.
This non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died
from his injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the
country from this but only one political party will have the balls
to talk about it.
Oh, Hutt, where were you when a high school girl in Loudoun County,
VA was violently raped in her high school restroom by a troon boy
wearing dress because leftists thought it was a good idea to let
boys into girls' restrooms? (And then the high school admin tried
to cover it up and had the girl's father arrested for trying to
expose the whole vile incident at a school board meeting.)
You don't seem to care about kids being violently attacked by other
kids if you can't point one of your grotesque claws at it and
screech "Republicans!"
Rape-prevention should in no way depend on keeping restrooms
segregated.
women? A pinky swear from the man that he'll never use his dick in a
non-consensual way? Security guards between the real women and the
pretend-women? Or the usual leftist way: pretend it'll never happen,
then deny that it happened when it does?
*MY* plan might first determine whether transvestite men are actually
*less* likely to be rapists than the male population as a whole.
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/26/2024 10:56 PM, Rhino wrote:
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 14:22:07 -0500
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/26/2024 1:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:What's YOUR plan to keep men dressed as women from sexually assaulting
On Feb 26, 2024 at 1:05:42 AM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com>
wrote:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/after-nex-benedicts-death-lgbtq-oklahomans-vow-to-not-let-the-hate-take-over
After Nex Benedict’s death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to ‘not let the >>>>>> hate take over’
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans.
This non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died
from his injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the
country from this but only one political party will have the balls >>>>>> to talk about it.
Oh, Hutt, where were you when a high school girl in Loudoun County,
VA was violently raped in her high school restroom by a troon boy
wearing dress because leftists thought it was a good idea to let
boys into girls' restrooms? (And then the high school admin tried
to cover it up and had the girl's father arrested for trying to
expose the whole vile incident at a school board meeting.)
You don't seem to care about kids being violently attacked by other
kids if you can't point one of your grotesque claws at it and
screech "Republicans!"
Rape-prevention should in no way depend on keeping restrooms
segregated.
women? A pinky swear from the man that he'll never use his dick in a
non-consensual way? Security guards between the real women and the
pretend-women? Or the usual leftist way: pretend it'll never happen,
then deny that it happened when it does?
*MY* plan might first determine whether transvestite men are actually
*less* likely to be rapists than the male population as a whole.
If the chance is anything, but zero, they shouldn’t be in the women’s restroom.
On 2/27/2024 3:59 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/26/2024 10:56 PM, Rhino wrote:
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 14:22:07 -0500
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/26/2024 1:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:What's YOUR plan to keep men dressed as women from sexually assaulting >>> women? A pinky swear from the man that he'll never use his dick in a
On Feb 26, 2024 at 1:05:42 AM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com>
wrote:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/after-nex-benedicts-death-lgbtq-okl
ahomans-vow-to-not-let-the-hate-take-over
After Nex Benedict’s death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to ‘not let the >>>>>> hate take over’
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans.
This non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died >>>>>> from his injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the >>>>>> country from this but only one political party will have the balls >>>>>> to talk about it.
Oh, Hutt, where were you when a high school girl in Loudoun County, >>>>> VA was violently raped in her high school restroom by a troon boy
wearing dress because leftists thought it was a good idea to let
boys into girls' restrooms? (And then the high school admin tried
to cover it up and had the girl's father arrested for trying to
expose the whole vile incident at a school board meeting.)
You don't seem to care about kids being violently attacked by other >>>>> kids if you can't point one of your grotesque claws at it and
screech "Republicans!"
Rape-prevention should in no way depend on keeping restrooms
segregated.
non-consensual way? Security guards between the real women and the
pretend-women? Or the usual leftist way: pretend it'll never happen,
then deny that it happened when it does?
*MY* plan might first determine whether transvestite men are actually
*less* likely to be rapists than the male population as a whole.
If the chance is anything, but zero, they shouldn’t be in the women’s restroom.
Afaik, there's *no* (adult) group for whom the chance is zero. The
point is that, if you have limited resources to apply towards rape-prevention, targeting male transvestites might not be your first
option.
In article
<17b7d5437485e1df$26069$2757267$c4d58e68@news.newsdemon.com>,
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/27/2024 3:59 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/26/2024 10:56 PM, Rhino wrote:
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 14:22:07 -0500
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/26/2024 1:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:What's YOUR plan to keep men dressed as women from sexually assaulting >>>>> women? A pinky swear from the man that he'll never use his dick in a >>>>> non-consensual way? Security guards between the real women and the
On Feb 26, 2024 at 1:05:42 AM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> >>>>>>> wrote:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/after-nex-benedicts-death-lgbtq-okl
ahomans-vow-to-not-let-the-hate-take-over
After Nex Benedict’s death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to ‘not let the >>>>>>>> hate take over’
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans. >>>>>>>> This non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died >>>>>>>> from his injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the >>>>>>>> country from this but only one political party will have the balls >>>>>>>> to talk about it.
Oh, Hutt, where were you when a high school girl in Loudoun County, >>>>>>> VA was violently raped in her high school restroom by a troon boy >>>>>>> wearing dress because leftists thought it was a good idea to let >>>>>>> boys into girls' restrooms? (And then the high school admin tried >>>>>>> to cover it up and had the girl's father arrested for trying to
expose the whole vile incident at a school board meeting.)
You don't seem to care about kids being violently attacked by other >>>>>>> kids if you can't point one of your grotesque claws at it and
screech "Republicans!"
Rape-prevention should in no way depend on keeping restrooms
segregated.
pretend-women? Or the usual leftist way: pretend it'll never happen, >>>>> then deny that it happened when it does?
*MY* plan might first determine whether transvestite men are actually
*less* likely to be rapists than the male population as a whole.
If the chance is anything, but zero, they shouldn’t be in the women’s >>> restroom.
Afaik, there's *no* (adult) group for whom the chance is zero. The
point is that, if you have limited resources to apply towards
rape-prevention, targeting male transvestites might not be your first
option.
No one had to target anyone. They could have just left it like it was
since we invented public restrooms.
On 2/27/2024 5:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article
<17b7d5437485e1df$26069$2757267$c4d58e68@news.newsdemon.com>,
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/27/2024 3:59 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/26/2024 10:56 PM, Rhino wrote:
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 14:22:07 -0500
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/26/2024 1:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:What's YOUR plan to keep men dressed as women from sexually assaulting >>>>> women? A pinky swear from the man that he'll never use his dick in a >>>>> non-consensual way? Security guards between the real women and the >>>>> pretend-women? Or the usual leftist way: pretend it'll never happen, >>>>> then deny that it happened when it does?
On Feb 26, 2024 at 1:05:42 AM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> >>>>>>> wrote:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/after-nex-benedicts-death-lgbtq-o
kl
ahomans-vow-to-not-let-the-hate-take-over
After Nex Benedict’s death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to ‘not let the
hate take over’
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans. >>>>>>>> This non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died >>>>>>>> from his injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the >>>>>>>> country from this but only one political party will have the balls >>>>>>>> to talk about it.
Oh, Hutt, where were you when a high school girl in Loudoun County, >>>>>>> VA was violently raped in her high school restroom by a troon boy >>>>>>> wearing dress because leftists thought it was a good idea to let >>>>>>> boys into girls' restrooms? (And then the high school admin tried >>>>>>> to cover it up and had the girl's father arrested for trying to >>>>>>> expose the whole vile incident at a school board meeting.)
You don't seem to care about kids being violently attacked by other >>>>>>> kids if you can't point one of your grotesque claws at it and
screech "Republicans!"
Rape-prevention should in no way depend on keeping restrooms
segregated.
*MY* plan might first determine whether transvestite men are actually >>>> *less* likely to be rapists than the male population as a whole.
If the chance is anything, but zero, they shouldn’t be in the women’s >>> restroom.
Afaik, there's *no* (adult) group for whom the chance is zero. The
point is that, if you have limited resources to apply towards
rape-prevention, targeting male transvestites might not be your first
option.
No one had to target anyone. They could have just left it like it was
since we invented public restrooms.
Then make that argument, without crying "Rape!".
In article
<17b7dd6b665e79cf$44014$2730048$52d51861@news.newsdemon.com>,
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/27/2024 5:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article
<17b7d5437485e1df$26069$2757267$c4d58e68@news.newsdemon.com>,
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/27/2024 3:59 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/26/2024 10:56 PM, Rhino wrote:
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 14:22:07 -0500
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/26/2024 1:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:What's YOUR plan to keep men dressed as women from sexually assaulting >>>>>>> women? A pinky swear from the man that he'll never use his dick in a >>>>>>> non-consensual way? Security guards between the real women and the >>>>>>> pretend-women? Or the usual leftist way: pretend it'll never happen, >>>>>>> then deny that it happened when it does?
On Feb 26, 2024 at 1:05:42 AM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/after-nex-benedicts-death-lgbtq-o
kl
ahomans-vow-to-not-let-the-hate-take-over
After Nex Benedict’s death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to ‘not let the
hate take over’
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans. >>>>>>>>>> This non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died >>>>>>>>>> from his injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the >>>>>>>>>> country from this but only one political party will have the balls >>>>>>>>>> to talk about it.
Oh, Hutt, where were you when a high school girl in Loudoun County, >>>>>>>>> VA was violently raped in her high school restroom by a troon boy >>>>>>>>> wearing dress because leftists thought it was a good idea to let >>>>>>>>> boys into girls' restrooms? (And then the high school admin tried >>>>>>>>> to cover it up and had the girl's father arrested for trying to >>>>>>>>> expose the whole vile incident at a school board meeting.)
You don't seem to care about kids being violently attacked by other >>>>>>>>> kids if you can't point one of your grotesque claws at it and >>>>>>>>> screech "Republicans!"
Rape-prevention should in no way depend on keeping restrooms
segregated.
*MY* plan might first determine whether transvestite men are actually >>>>>> *less* likely to be rapists than the male population as a whole.
If the chance is anything, but zero, they shouldn’t be in the women’s >>>>> restroom.
Afaik, there's *no* (adult) group for whom the chance is zero. The
point is that, if you have limited resources to apply towards
rape-prevention, targeting male transvestites might not be your first
option.
No one had to target anyone. They could have just left it like it was
since we invented public restrooms.
Then make that argument, without crying "Rape!".
But... there was a rape.
On 2/26/2024 10:56 PM, Rhino wrote:
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 14:22:07 -0500
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/26/2024 1:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:What's YOUR plan to keep men dressed as women from sexually
On Feb 26, 2024 at 1:05:42 AM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com>
wrote:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/after-nex-benedicts-death-lgbtq-oklahomans-vow-to-not-let-the-hate-take-over
After Nex Benedict’s death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to ‘not let the >>>> hate take over’
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans.
This non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died
from his injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the
country from this but only one political party will have the
balls to talk about it.
Oh, Hutt, where were you when a high school girl in Loudoun
County, VA was violently raped in her high school restroom by a
troon boy wearing dress because leftists thought it was a good
idea to let boys into girls' restrooms? (And then the high school
admin tried to cover it up and had the girl's father arrested for
trying to expose the whole vile incident at a school board
meeting.)
You don't seem to care about kids being violently attacked by
other kids if you can't point one of your grotesque claws at it
and screech "Republicans!"
Rape-prevention should in no way depend on keeping restrooms
segregated.
assaulting women? A pinky swear from the man that he'll never use
his dick in a non-consensual way? Security guards between the real
women and the pretend-women? Or the usual leftist way: pretend
it'll never happen, then deny that it happened when it does?
*MY* plan might first determine whether transvestite men are actually
*less* likely to be rapists than the male population as a whole.
In article
<17b7dd6b665e79cf$44014$2730048$52d51861@news.newsdemon.com>,
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/27/2024 5:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article
<17b7d5437485e1df$26069$2757267$c4d58e68@news.newsdemon.com>,
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/27/2024 3:59 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/26/2024 10:56 PM, Rhino wrote:
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 14:22:07 -0500
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/26/2024 1:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:What's YOUR plan to keep men dressed as women from sexually assaulting >>>>>>> women? A pinky swear from the man that he'll never use his dick in a >>>>>>> non-consensual way? Security guards between the real women and the >>>>>>> pretend-women? Or the usual leftist way: pretend it'll never happen, >>>>>>> then deny that it happened when it does?
On Feb 26, 2024 at 1:05:42 AM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/after-nex-benedicts-death-lgbtq-o
kl
ahomans-vow-to-not-let-the-hate-take-over
After Nex Benedict’s death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to ‘not let the
hate take over’
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans. >>>>>>>>>> This non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died >>>>>>>>>> from his injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the >>>>>>>>>> country from this but only one political party will have the balls >>>>>>>>>> to talk about it.
Oh, Hutt, where were you when a high school girl in Loudoun County, >>>>>>>>> VA was violently raped in her high school restroom by a troon boy >>>>>>>>> wearing dress because leftists thought it was a good idea to let >>>>>>>>> boys into girls' restrooms? (And then the high school admin tried >>>>>>>>> to cover it up and had the girl's father arrested for trying to >>>>>>>>> expose the whole vile incident at a school board meeting.)
You don't seem to care about kids being violently attacked by other >>>>>>>>> kids if you can't point one of your grotesque claws at it and >>>>>>>>> screech "Republicans!"
Rape-prevention should in no way depend on keeping restrooms
segregated.
*MY* plan might first determine whether transvestite men are actually >>>>>> *less* likely to be rapists than the male population as a whole.
If the chance is anything, but zero, they shouldn’t be in the women’s >>>>> restroom.
Afaik, there's *no* (adult) group for whom the chance is zero. The
point is that, if you have limited resources to apply towards
rape-prevention, targeting male transvestites might not be your first
option.
No one had to target anyone. They could have just left it like it was
since we invented public restrooms.
Then make that argument, without crying "Rape!".
But... there was a rape.
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 14:37:32 -0500
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/26/2024 10:56 PM, Rhino wrote:I see. Play some statistical games and "prove" that they're harmless
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 14:22:07 -0500
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/26/2024 1:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:What's YOUR plan to keep men dressed as women from sexually
On Feb 26, 2024 at 1:05:42 AM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com>
wrote:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/after-nex-benedicts-death-lgbtq-oklahomans-vow-to-not-let-the-hate-take-over
After Nex Benedict’s death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to ‘not let the >>>>>> hate take over’
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans.
This non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died
from his injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the
country from this but only one political party will have the
balls to talk about it.
Oh, Hutt, where were you when a high school girl in Loudoun
County, VA was violently raped in her high school restroom by a
troon boy wearing dress because leftists thought it was a good
idea to let boys into girls' restrooms? (And then the high school
admin tried to cover it up and had the girl's father arrested for
trying to expose the whole vile incident at a school board
meeting.)
You don't seem to care about kids being violently attacked by
other kids if you can't point one of your grotesque claws at it
and screech "Republicans!"
Rape-prevention should in no way depend on keeping restrooms
segregated.
assaulting women? A pinky swear from the man that he'll never use
his dick in a non-consensual way? Security guards between the real
women and the pretend-women? Or the usual leftist way: pretend
it'll never happen, then deny that it happened when it does?
*MY* plan might first determine whether transvestite men are actually
*less* likely to be rapists than the male population as a whole.
(or at least more harmless) than straight men, then argue that no
special precautions need to be taken. After all, we know very
well that statistics are NEVER abused. Awesome solution.... </sarc>
On 2/26/2024 2:22 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 2/26/2024 1:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Feb 26, 2024 at 1:05:42 AM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans. ThisOh, Hutt, where were you when a high school girl in Loudoun County, VA
non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died from his
injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the country from
this but only one political party will have the balls to talk about it. >>>
was violently raped in her high school restroom by a troon boy wearing
dress because leftists thought it was a good idea to let boys into girls' >>> restrooms?
(And then the high school admin tried to cover it up and had the
girl's father arrested for trying to expose the whole vile incident at a >>> school board meeting.)
You don't seem to care about kids being violently attacked by other
kids if you can't point one of your grotesque claws at it and screech
"Republicans!"
Rape-prevention should in no way depend on keeping restrooms segregated.
*MY* plan might first determine whether transvestite men are actually
*less* likely to be rapists than the male population as a whole.
On 2/27/2024 10:36 PM, Rhino wrote:
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 14:37:32 -0500
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/26/2024 10:56 PM, Rhino wrote:I see. Play some statistical games and "prove" that they're harmless
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 14:22:07 -0500
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/26/2024 1:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:What's YOUR plan to keep men dressed as women from sexually
On Feb 26, 2024 at 1:05:42 AM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com>
wrote:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/after-nex-benedicts-death-lgbtq-okl
ahomans-vow-to-not-let-the-hate-take-over
After Nex Benedict's death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to 'not let the >>>>>> hate take over'
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans.
This non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died >>>>>> from his injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the >>>>>> country from this but only one political party will have the
balls to talk about it.
Oh, Hutt, where were you when a high school girl in Loudoun
County, VA was violently raped in her high school restroom by a
troon boy wearing dress because leftists thought it was a good
idea to let boys into girls' restrooms? (And then the high school
admin tried to cover it up and had the girl's father arrested for
trying to expose the whole vile incident at a school board
meeting.)
You don't seem to care about kids being violently attacked by
other kids if you can't point one of your grotesque claws at it
and screech "Republicans!"
Rape-prevention should in no way depend on keeping restrooms
segregated.
assaulting women? A pinky swear from the man that he'll never use
his dick in a non-consensual way? Security guards between the real
women and the pretend-women? Or the usual leftist way: pretend
it'll never happen, then deny that it happened when it does?
*MY* plan might first determine whether transvestite men are actually
*less* likely to be rapists than the male population as a whole.
(or at least more harmless) than straight men, then argue that no
special precautions need to be taken. After all, we know very
well that statistics are NEVER abused. Awesome solution.... </sarc>
Sometimes we collect facts to make a better informed decision, and not
merely to contradict a fact-free supposition. Personally, I would've
thought it common sense that men who dress as women would be especially *repelled* by male hyper-aggression, but maybe you know better.
On 2/27/2024 7:37 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article
<17b7dd6b665e79cf$44014$2730048$52d51861@news.newsdemon.com>,
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/27/2024 5:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article
<17b7d5437485e1df$26069$2757267$c4d58e68@news.newsdemon.com>,
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/27/2024 3:59 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/26/2024 10:56 PM, Rhino wrote:If the chance is anything, but zero, they shouldn't be in the women's >>>>> restroom.
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 14:22:07 -0500
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/26/2024 1:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:What's YOUR plan to keep men dressed as women from sexually
On Feb 26, 2024 at 1:05:42 AM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/after-nex-benedicts-death-lgbtq
-o
kl
ahomans-vow-to-not-let-the-hate-take-over
After Nex Benedict’s death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to ‘not let the
hate take over’
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans. >>>>>>>>>> This non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died >>>>>>>>>> from his injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the >>>>>>>>>> country from this but only one political party will have the balls >>>>>>>>>> to talk about it.
Oh, Hutt, where were you when a high school girl in Loudoun County, >>>>>>>>> VA was violently raped in her high school restroom by a troon boy >>>>>>>>> wearing dress because leftists thought it was a good idea to let >>>>>>>>> boys into girls' restrooms? (And then the high school admin tried >>>>>>>>> to cover it up and had the girl's father arrested for trying to >>>>>>>>> expose the whole vile incident at a school board meeting.) >>>>>>>>>
You don't seem to care about kids being violently attacked by other >>>>>>>>> kids if you can't point one of your grotesque claws at it and >>>>>>>>> screech "Republicans!"
Rape-prevention should in no way depend on keeping restrooms >>>>>>>> segregated.
assaulting
women? A pinky swear from the man that he'll never use his dick in a >>>>>>> non-consensual way? Security guards between the real women and the >>>>>>> pretend-women? Or the usual leftist way: pretend it'll never happen, >>>>>>> then deny that it happened when it does?
*MY* plan might first determine whether transvestite men are actually >>>>>> *less* likely to be rapists than the male population as a whole. >>>>>>
Afaik, there's *no* (adult) group for whom the chance is zero. The
point is that, if you have limited resources to apply towards
rape-prevention, targeting male transvestites might not be your first >>>> option.
No one had to target anyone. They could have just left it like it was
since we invented public restrooms.
Then make that argument, without crying "Rape!".
But... there was a rape.
I'd be willing to bet that the vast, vast majority of restroom rapes
(and there seem to be plenty) don't involve transvestitism. Seizing on
one that does seems somewhere between odd and deliberately misleading.
In article <17b7ea21d814d87c$23$762855$cd54664@news.newsdemon.com>,
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/27/2024 7:37 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article
<17b7dd6b665e79cf$44014$2730048$52d51861@news.newsdemon.com>,
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/27/2024 5:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article
<17b7d5437485e1df$26069$2757267$c4d58e68@news.newsdemon.com>,
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/27/2024 3:59 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/26/2024 10:56 PM, Rhino wrote:If the chance is anything, but zero, they shouldn't be in the women's >>>>>>> restroom.
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 14:22:07 -0500
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/26/2024 1:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:What's YOUR plan to keep men dressed as women from sexually
On Feb 26, 2024 at 1:05:42 AM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/after-nex-benedicts-death-lgbtq
-o
kl
ahomans-vow-to-not-let-the-hate-take-over
After Nex Benedict’s death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to ‘not let the
hate take over’
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans. >>>>>>>>>>>> This non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died >>>>>>>>>>>> from his injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the >>>>>>>>>>>> country from this but only one political party will have the balls >>>>>>>>>>>> to talk about it.
Oh, Hutt, where were you when a high school girl in Loudoun County, >>>>>>>>>>> VA was violently raped in her high school restroom by a troon boy >>>>>>>>>>> wearing dress because leftists thought it was a good idea to let >>>>>>>>>>> boys into girls' restrooms? (And then the high school admin tried >>>>>>>>>>> to cover it up and had the girl's father arrested for trying to >>>>>>>>>>> expose the whole vile incident at a school board meeting.) >>>>>>>>>>>
You don't seem to care about kids being violently attacked by other >>>>>>>>>>> kids if you can't point one of your grotesque claws at it and >>>>>>>>>>> screech "Republicans!"
Rape-prevention should in no way depend on keeping restrooms >>>>>>>>>> segregated.
assaulting
women? A pinky swear from the man that he'll never use his dick in a >>>>>>>>> non-consensual way? Security guards between the real women and the >>>>>>>>> pretend-women? Or the usual leftist way: pretend it'll never happen, >>>>>>>>> then deny that it happened when it does?
*MY* plan might first determine whether transvestite men are actually >>>>>>>> *less* likely to be rapists than the male population as a whole. >>>>>>>>
Afaik, there's *no* (adult) group for whom the chance is zero. The >>>>>> point is that, if you have limited resources to apply towards
rape-prevention, targeting male transvestites might not be your first >>>>>> option.
No one had to target anyone. They could have just left it like it was >>>>> since we invented public restrooms.
Then make that argument, without crying "Rape!".
But... there was a rape.
I'd be willing to bet that the vast, vast majority of restroom rapes
(and there seem to be plenty) don't involve transvestitism. Seizing on
one that does seems somewhere between odd and deliberately misleading.
But... the only reason this rape happened was because the boy put on a
dress and all the female students were told that boys in dresses are now allowed to be in your restrooms, changing rooms, locker rooms, and
showers, your rights to privacy be damned.
So during normal times, if a boy walked into the girl's restroom he
would immediately have been reported and staff summoned to deal with it.
Now, reporting him gets the reportee punished for lack of ideological
purity and undermining the Agenda.
This rape happened because of the school's troon policy. Period.
In article
<17b7eb15f2ae48b8$40248$1496314$4cd50660@news.newsdemon.com>,
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/27/2024 10:36 PM, Rhino wrote:
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 14:37:32 -0500
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/26/2024 10:56 PM, Rhino wrote:I see. Play some statistical games and "prove" that they're harmless
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 14:22:07 -0500
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/26/2024 1:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:What's YOUR plan to keep men dressed as women from sexually
On Feb 26, 2024 at 1:05:42 AM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> >>>>>>> wrote:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/after-nex-benedicts-death-lgbtq-okl
ahomans-vow-to-not-let-the-hate-take-over
After Nex Benedict's death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to 'not let the >>>>>>>> hate take over'
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans. >>>>>>>> This non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died >>>>>>>> from his injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the >>>>>>>> country from this but only one political party will have the
balls to talk about it.
Oh, Hutt, where were you when a high school girl in Loudoun
County, VA was violently raped in her high school restroom by a
troon boy wearing dress because leftists thought it was a good
idea to let boys into girls' restrooms? (And then the high school >>>>>>> admin tried to cover it up and had the girl's father arrested for >>>>>>> trying to expose the whole vile incident at a school board
meeting.)
You don't seem to care about kids being violently attacked by
other kids if you can't point one of your grotesque claws at it
and screech "Republicans!"
Rape-prevention should in no way depend on keeping restrooms
segregated.
assaulting women? A pinky swear from the man that he'll never use
his dick in a non-consensual way? Security guards between the real
women and the pretend-women? Or the usual leftist way: pretend
it'll never happen, then deny that it happened when it does?
*MY* plan might first determine whether transvestite men are actually
*less* likely to be rapists than the male population as a whole.
(or at least more harmless) than straight men, then argue that no
special precautions need to be taken. After all, we know very
well that statistics are NEVER abused. Awesome solution.... </sarc>
Sometimes we collect facts to make a better informed decision, and not
merely to contradict a fact-free supposition. Personally, I would've
thought it common sense that men who dress as women would be especially
*repelled* by male hyper-aggression, but maybe you know better.
Or maybe some men are gaming this idiotic system that has emerged and
are just pretending to be troons to gain access to women's spaces or,
for example, to be sent to a women's prison where they have a captive
group of victims to prey upon and don't have to worry so much about
their own safety as they would in a men's prison.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/after-nex-benedicts-death-lgbtq-oklahomans-vow-to-not-let-the-hate-take-over
After Nex Benedict’s death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to 'not let the hate
take over'
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans. This non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died from his injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the country from
this but only one political party will have the balls to talk about it. Cowardice, ignorance, and no balls, that sums up the Republican side of
the equation.
On 2/28/24 11:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
After Nex Benedict’s death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to 'not let the hate >>> take over'
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans. This
non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died from his
injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the country from
this but only one political party will have the balls to talk about it.
Cowardice, ignorance, and no balls, that sums up the Republican side of
the equation.
Another demographic you're curiously unconcerned about Hutt...
In the last week alone, illegal aliens have been arrested for:
--Murdering a college student in Georgia
--Murdering a 2-year-old boy in Maryland
--Raping a minor in Virginia
--Raping a minor at knifepoint in Louisiana
--Shooting three DC police officers
But that's all down to Joe Biden's border policies. No Republicans to
blame so Hutt doesn't care.
Again, Thanny the Liar strikes!
On 2/27/2024 7:37 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/27/2024 5:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/27/2024 3:59 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/26/2024 10:56 PM, Rhino wrote:
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 14:22:07 -0500
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/26/2024 1:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
"trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
What's YOUR plan to keep men dressed as women from sexuallyAnother low point in American history courtesy of Republicans. >>>>>>>>>>> This non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died >>>>>>>>>>> from his injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the >>>>>>>>>>> country from this but only one political party will have the >>>>>>>>>>> balls to talk about it.
Oh, Hutt, where were you when a high school girl in Loudoun >>>>>>>>>> County, VA was violently raped in her high school restroom by a >>>>>>>>>> troon boy wearing dress because leftists thought it was a good >>>>>>>>>> idea to let boys into girls' restrooms? (And then the high school >>>>>>>>>> admin tried to cover it up and had the girl's father arrested for >>>>>>>>>> trying to expose the whole vile incident at a school board >>>>>>>>>> meeting.)
You don't seem to care about kids being violently attacked by >>>>>>>>>> other kids if you can't point one of your grotesque claws at it >>>>>>>>>> and screech "Republicans!"
Rape-prevention should in no way depend on keeping restrooms >>>>>>>>> segregated.
assaulting women? A pinky swear from the man that he'll never use >>>>>>>> his dick in a non-consensual way? Security guards between the real >>>>>>>> women and the pretend-women? Or the usual leftist way: pretend it'll >>>>>>>> never happen, then deny that it happened when it does?
*MY* plan might first determine whether transvestite men are actually >>>>>>> *less* likely to be rapists than the male population as a whole. >>>>>>>
If the chance is anything, but zero, they shouldn't be in the women's >>>>>> restroom.
Afaik, there's *no* (adult) group for whom the chance is zero. The
point is that, if you have limited resources to apply towards
rape-prevention, targeting male transvestites might not be your first >>>>> option.
No one had to target anyone. They could have just left it like it was
since we invented public restrooms.
Then make that argument, without crying "Rape!".
But... there was a rape.
I'd be willing to bet that the vast, vast majority of restroom rapes
(and there seem to be plenty) don't involve transvestitism. Seizing on
one that does seems somewhere between odd and deliberately misleading.
On Feb 26, 2024 at 1:05:42 AM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:Make you wonder what last week's top-five rap sheet would look like for
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/after-nex-benedicts-death-lgbtq-oklahomans-vow-to-not-let-the-hate-take-over
After Nex Benedict’s death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to 'not let the hate
take over'
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans. This
non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died from his
injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the country from
this but only one political party will have the balls to talk about it.
Cowardice, ignorance, and no balls, that sums up the Republican side of
the equation.
Another demographic you're curiously unconcerned about Hutt...
In the last week alone, illegal aliens have been arrested for:
--Murdering a college student in Georgia
--Murdering a 2-year-old boy in Maryland
--Raping a minor in Virginia
--Raping a minor at knifepoint in Louisiana
--Shooting three DC police officers
But that's all down to Joe Biden's border policies. No Republicans to blame so
Hutt doesn't care.
On 2/28/2024 11:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Feb 26, 2024 at 1:05:42 AM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/after-nex-benedicts-death-lgbtq-oklahom
ans-vow-to-not-let-the-hate-take-over
After Nex Benedictีs death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to 'not let the hate >> take over'
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans. This
non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died from his
injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the country from
this but only one political party will have the balls to talk about it.
Cowardice, ignorance, and no balls, that sums up the Republican side of
the equation.
Another demographic you're curiously unconcerned about Hutt...
In the last week alone, illegal aliens have been arrested for:
--Murdering a college student in Georgia
--Murdering a 2-year-old boy in Maryland
--Raping a minor in Virginia
--Raping a minor at knifepoint in Louisiana
--Shooting three DC police officers
But that's all down to Joe Biden's border policies. No Republicans to blame so Hutt doesn't care.
Make you wonder what last week's top-five rap sheet would look like for
any other demographic. Well, maybe not Rhodes scholars...
On 2/28/2024 2:19 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article
<17b7eb15f2ae48b8$40248$1496314$4cd50660@news.newsdemon.com>,
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/27/2024 10:36 PM, Rhino wrote:
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 14:37:32 -0500
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/26/2024 10:56 PM, Rhino wrote:I see. Play some statistical games and "prove" that they're harmless
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 14:22:07 -0500
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/26/2024 1:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:What's YOUR plan to keep men dressed as women from sexually
On Feb 26, 2024 at 1:05:42 AM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> >>>>>>> wrote:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/after-nex-benedicts-death-lgbtq-o
kl
ahomans-vow-to-not-let-the-hate-take-over
After Nex Benedict's death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to 'not let the >>>>>>>> hate take over'
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans. >>>>>>>> This non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died >>>>>>>> from his injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the >>>>>>>> country from this but only one political party will have the >>>>>>>> balls to talk about it.
Oh, Hutt, where were you when a high school girl in Loudoun
County, VA was violently raped in her high school restroom by a >>>>>>> troon boy wearing dress because leftists thought it was a good >>>>>>> idea to let boys into girls' restrooms? (And then the high school >>>>>>> admin tried to cover it up and had the girl's father arrested for >>>>>>> trying to expose the whole vile incident at a school board
meeting.)
You don't seem to care about kids being violently attacked by
other kids if you can't point one of your grotesque claws at it >>>>>>> and screech "Republicans!"
Rape-prevention should in no way depend on keeping restrooms
segregated.
assaulting women? A pinky swear from the man that he'll never use
his dick in a non-consensual way? Security guards between the real >>>>> women and the pretend-women? Or the usual leftist way: pretend
it'll never happen, then deny that it happened when it does?
*MY* plan might first determine whether transvestite men are actually >>>> *less* likely to be rapists than the male population as a whole.
(or at least more harmless) than straight men, then argue that no
special precautions need to be taken. After all, we know very
well that statistics are NEVER abused. Awesome solution.... </sarc>
Sometimes we collect facts to make a better informed decision, and not
merely to contradict a fact-free supposition. Personally, I would've
thought it common sense that men who dress as women would be especially
*repelled* by male hyper-aggression, but maybe you know better.
Or maybe some men are gaming this idiotic system that has emerged and
are just pretending to be troons to gain access to women's spaces or,
for example, to be sent to a women's prison where they have a captive
group of victims to prey upon and don't have to worry so much about
their own safety as they would in a men's prison.
Well, yeah, there'll never be a social "system" that no one is "gaming".
On 2/29/24 1:36 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article
<17b8668d2dfab92e$44068$2730048$52d51861@news.newsdemon.com>,
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/28/2024 11:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Feb 26, 2024 at 1:05:42 AM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> wrote: >>>>
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/after-nex-benedicts-death-lgbtq-oklahom
ans-vow-to-not-let-the-hate-take-over
After Nex Benedictีs death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to 'not let the hate >>>>> take over'
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans. This
non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died from his >>>>> injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the country from
this but only one political party will have the balls to talk about it. >>>>> Cowardice, ignorance, and no balls, that sums up the Republican side of >>>>> the equation.
Another demographic you're curiously unconcerned about Hutt...
In the last week alone, illegal aliens have been arrested for:
--Murdering a college student in Georgia
--Murdering a 2-year-old boy in Maryland
--Raping a minor in Virginia
--Raping a minor at knifepoint in Louisiana
--Shooting three DC police officers
But that's all down to Joe Biden's border policies. No Republicans to blame
so Hutt doesn't care.
Make you wonder what last week's top-five rap sheet would look like for
any other demographic. Well, maybe not Rhodes scholars...
Doesn't matter. As you note, we have plenty of our own criminals to deal
with. There's no reason to be importing them from other countries en
masse.
It's no secret that Venezuela and El Salvador are taking advantage of
Biden's border insanity by throwing open their prisons and letting their
worst out on the condition that they leave the country and go to
America. And of course we let them in without vetting them at all,
because our government is either deeply stupid or deeply corrupt.
Nigeria, all the way over in Africa, is doing the same and facilitating
the travel of their murderers and rapists to Mexico so they can mule
themselves north and culturally enrich our cities.
As Trump said once upon a time at the base of an escalator, "They're not
sending their best."
Is that the same Trump who's a rapist?
And the same Trump who owes half a billion dollars in fines?
And is it the same Trump who has 91 felony charges pending?
In 4 jurisdictions, both state and federal?
He's your go-to guy for spotting criminals? Wonder why?
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/26/2024 10:56 PM, Rhino wrote:
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 14:22:07 -0500
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/26/2024 1:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:What's YOUR plan to keep men dressed as women from sexually assaulting
On Feb 26, 2024 at 1:05:42 AM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com>
wrote:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/after-nex-benedicts-death-lgbtq-oklahomans-vow-to-not-let-the-hate-take-over
After Nex Benedict’s death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to ‘not let the >>>>>> hate take over’
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans.
This non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died
from his injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the
country from this but only one political party will have the balls >>>>>> to talk about it.
Oh, Hutt, where were you when a high school girl in Loudoun County,
VA was violently raped in her high school restroom by a troon boy
wearing dress because leftists thought it was a good idea to let
boys into girls' restrooms? (And then the high school admin tried
to cover it up and had the girl's father arrested for trying to
expose the whole vile incident at a school board meeting.)
You don't seem to care about kids being violently attacked by other
kids if you can't point one of your grotesque claws at it and
screech "Republicans!"
Rape-prevention should in no way depend on keeping restrooms
segregated.
women? A pinky swear from the man that he'll never use his dick in a
non-consensual way? Security guards between the real women and the
pretend-women? Or the usual leftist way: pretend it'll never happen,
then deny that it happened when it does?
*MY* plan might first determine whether transvestite men are actually
*less* likely to be rapists than the male population as a whole.
If the chance is anything, but zero, they shouldn’t be in the women’s restroom.
In article
<17b7d5437485e1df$26069$2757267$c4d58e68@news.newsdemon.com>,
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/27/2024 3:59 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/26/2024 10:56 PM, Rhino wrote:
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 14:22:07 -0500
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/26/2024 1:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:What's YOUR plan to keep men dressed as women from sexually assaulting >>>>> women? A pinky swear from the man that he'll never use his dick in a >>>>> non-consensual way? Security guards between the real women and the
On Feb 26, 2024 at 1:05:42 AM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> >>>>>>> wrote:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/after-nex-benedicts-death-lgbtq-okl
ahomans-vow-to-not-let-the-hate-take-over
After Nex Benedict’s death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to ‘not let the >>>>>>>> hate take over’
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans. >>>>>>>> This non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died >>>>>>>> from his injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the >>>>>>>> country from this but only one political party will have the balls >>>>>>>> to talk about it.
Oh, Hutt, where were you when a high school girl in Loudoun County, >>>>>>> VA was violently raped in her high school restroom by a troon boy >>>>>>> wearing dress because leftists thought it was a good idea to let >>>>>>> boys into girls' restrooms? (And then the high school admin tried >>>>>>> to cover it up and had the girl's father arrested for trying to
expose the whole vile incident at a school board meeting.)
You don't seem to care about kids being violently attacked by other >>>>>>> kids if you can't point one of your grotesque claws at it and
screech "Republicans!"
Rape-prevention should in no way depend on keeping restrooms
segregated.
pretend-women? Or the usual leftist way: pretend it'll never happen, >>>>> then deny that it happened when it does?
*MY* plan might first determine whether transvestite men are actually
*less* likely to be rapists than the male population as a whole.
If the chance is anything, but zero, they shouldn’t be in the women’s >>> restroom.
Afaik, there's *no* (adult) group for whom the chance is zero. The
point is that, if you have limited resources to apply towards
rape-prevention, targeting male transvestites might not be your first
option.
No one had to target anyone. They could have just left it like it was
since we invented public restrooms.
In article
<17b7eb15f2ae48b8$40248$1496314$4cd50660@news.newsdemon.com>,
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/27/2024 10:36 PM, Rhino wrote:
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 14:37:32 -0500
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/26/2024 10:56 PM, Rhino wrote:I see. Play some statistical games and "prove" that they're harmless
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 14:22:07 -0500
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/26/2024 1:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:What's YOUR plan to keep men dressed as women from sexually
On Feb 26, 2024 at 1:05:42 AM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> >>>>>>> wrote:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/after-nex-benedicts-death-lgbtq-okl
ahomans-vow-to-not-let-the-hate-take-over
After Nex Benedict's death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to 'not let the >>>>>>>> hate take over'
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans. >>>>>>>> This non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died >>>>>>>> from his injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the >>>>>>>> country from this but only one political party will have the
balls to talk about it.
Oh, Hutt, where were you when a high school girl in Loudoun
County, VA was violently raped in her high school restroom by a
troon boy wearing dress because leftists thought it was a good
idea to let boys into girls' restrooms? (And then the high school >>>>>>> admin tried to cover it up and had the girl's father arrested for >>>>>>> trying to expose the whole vile incident at a school board
meeting.)
You don't seem to care about kids being violently attacked by
other kids if you can't point one of your grotesque claws at it
and screech "Republicans!"
Rape-prevention should in no way depend on keeping restrooms
segregated.
assaulting women? A pinky swear from the man that he'll never use
his dick in a non-consensual way? Security guards between the real
women and the pretend-women? Or the usual leftist way: pretend
it'll never happen, then deny that it happened when it does?
*MY* plan might first determine whether transvestite men are actually
*less* likely to be rapists than the male population as a whole.
(or at least more harmless) than straight men, then argue that no
special precautions need to be taken. After all, we know very
well that statistics are NEVER abused. Awesome solution.... </sarc>
Sometimes we collect facts to make a better informed decision, and not
merely to contradict a fact-free supposition. Personally, I would've
thought it common sense that men who dress as women would be especially
*repelled* by male hyper-aggression, but maybe you know better.
Or maybe some men are gaming this idiotic system that has emerged and
are just pretending to be troons to gain access to women's spaces or,
for example, to be sent to a women's prison where they have a captive
group of victims to prey upon and don't have to worry so much about
their own safety as they would in a men's prison.
In article <17b7ea21d814d87c$23$762855$cd54664@news.newsdemon.com>,
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/27/2024 7:37 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article
<17b7dd6b665e79cf$44014$2730048$52d51861@news.newsdemon.com>,
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/27/2024 5:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article
<17b7d5437485e1df$26069$2757267$c4d58e68@news.newsdemon.com>,
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/27/2024 3:59 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/26/2024 10:56 PM, Rhino wrote:If the chance is anything, but zero, they shouldn't be in the women's >>>>>>> restroom.
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 14:22:07 -0500
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/26/2024 1:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:What's YOUR plan to keep men dressed as women from sexually
On Feb 26, 2024 at 1:05:42 AM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/after-nex-benedicts-death-lgbtq
-o
kl
ahomans-vow-to-not-let-the-hate-take-over
After Nex Benedict’s death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to ‘not let the
hate take over’
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans. >>>>>>>>>>>> This non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died >>>>>>>>>>>> from his injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the >>>>>>>>>>>> country from this but only one political party will have the balls >>>>>>>>>>>> to talk about it.
Oh, Hutt, where were you when a high school girl in Loudoun County, >>>>>>>>>>> VA was violently raped in her high school restroom by a troon boy >>>>>>>>>>> wearing dress because leftists thought it was a good idea to let >>>>>>>>>>> boys into girls' restrooms? (And then the high school admin tried >>>>>>>>>>> to cover it up and had the girl's father arrested for trying to >>>>>>>>>>> expose the whole vile incident at a school board meeting.) >>>>>>>>>>>
You don't seem to care about kids being violently attacked by other >>>>>>>>>>> kids if you can't point one of your grotesque claws at it and >>>>>>>>>>> screech "Republicans!"
Rape-prevention should in no way depend on keeping restrooms >>>>>>>>>> segregated.
assaulting
women? A pinky swear from the man that he'll never use his dick in a >>>>>>>>> non-consensual way? Security guards between the real women and the >>>>>>>>> pretend-women? Or the usual leftist way: pretend it'll never happen, >>>>>>>>> then deny that it happened when it does?
*MY* plan might first determine whether transvestite men are actually >>>>>>>> *less* likely to be rapists than the male population as a whole. >>>>>>>>
Afaik, there's *no* (adult) group for whom the chance is zero. The >>>>>> point is that, if you have limited resources to apply towards
rape-prevention, targeting male transvestites might not be your first >>>>>> option.
No one had to target anyone. They could have just left it like it was >>>>> since we invented public restrooms.
Then make that argument, without crying "Rape!".
But... there was a rape.
I'd be willing to bet that the vast, vast majority of restroom rapes
(and there seem to be plenty) don't involve transvestitism. Seizing on
one that does seems somewhere between odd and deliberately misleading.
But... the only reason this rape happened was because the boy put on a
dress and all the female students were told that boys in dresses are now allowed to be in your restrooms, changing rooms, locker rooms, and
showers, your rights to privacy be damned.
So during normal times,
would immediately have been reported
Now, reporting him gets the reportee punished for lack of ideological
purity and undermining the Agenda.
This rape happened because of the school's troon policy. Period.
On Feb 26, 2024 at 1:05:42 AM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/after-nex-benedicts-death-lgbtq-oklahomans-vow-to-not-let-the-hate-take-over
After Nex Benedict’s death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to 'not let the hate
take over'
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans. This
non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died from his
injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the country from
this but only one political party will have the balls to talk about it.
Cowardice, ignorance, and no balls, that sums up the Republican side of
the equation.
Another demographic you're curiously unconcerned about Hutt...
In the last week alone, illegal aliens have been arrested for:
--Murdering a college student in Georgia
--Murdering a 2-year-old boy in Maryland
--Raping a minor in Virginia
--Raping a minor at knifepoint in Louisiana
--Shooting three DC police officers
But that's all down to Joe Biden's border policies. No Republicans to blame so
Hutt doesn't care.
In article
<17b8668d2dfab92e$44068$2730048$52d51861@news.newsdemon.com>,
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/28/2024 11:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Feb 26, 2024 at 1:05:42 AM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/after-nex-benedicts-death-lgbtq-oklahom
ans-vow-to-not-let-the-hate-take-over
After Nex Benedictีs death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to 'not let the hate >>>> take over'
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans. This
non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died from his
injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the country from
this but only one political party will have the balls to talk about it. >>>> Cowardice, ignorance, and no balls, that sums up the Republican side of >>>> the equation.
Another demographic you're curiously unconcerned about Hutt...
In the last week alone, illegal aliens have been arrested for:
--Murdering a college student in Georgia
--Murdering a 2-year-old boy in Maryland
--Raping a minor in Virginia
--Raping a minor at knifepoint in Louisiana
--Shooting three DC police officers
But that's all down to Joe Biden's border policies. No Republicans to blame >>> so Hutt doesn't care.
Make you wonder what last week's top-five rap sheet would look like for
any other demographic. Well, maybe not Rhodes scholars...
Doesn't matter. As you note, we have plenty of our own criminals to deal with. There's no reason to be importing them from other countries en
masse.
FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2/29/24 12:46 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 2/28/2024 11:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote:Biden and the Dems HAVE a border solution, and it has enough votes to
On Feb 26, 2024 at 1:05:42 AM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> wrote: >>>>Make you wonder what last week's top-five rap sheet would look like for
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/after-nex-benedicts-death-lgbtq-oklahomans-vow-to-not-let-the-hate-take-over
After Nex Benedict’s death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to 'not let the hate >>>>> take over'
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans. This >>>>> non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died from his >>>>> injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the country from
this but only one political party will have the balls to talk about it. >>>>> Cowardice, ignorance, and no balls, that sums up the Republican side of >>>>> the equation.
Another demographic you're curiously unconcerned about Hutt...
In the last week alone, illegal aliens have been arrested for:
--Murdering a college student in Georgia
--Murdering a 2-year-old boy in Maryland
--Raping a minor in Virginia
--Raping a minor at knifepoint in Louisiana
--Shooting three DC police officers
But that's all down to Joe Biden's border policies. No Republicans to
blame so
Hutt doesn't care.
any other demographic. Well, maybe not Rhodes scholars...
pass both houses.
That bill will allow 3000-5000 illegals per day to continue to flow
unvetted into America. That's not a 'solution', that's merely codifying the chaos into law and it was rightly rejected.
Republicans don't want a border solution, they want an issue to run on.
And after three years of an absolute Dem-induced free-for-all at the border
FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2/29/24 1:36 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article
<17b8668d2dfab92e$44068$2730048$52d51861@news.newsdemon.com>,
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/28/2024 11:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Feb 26, 2024 at 1:05:42 AM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> wrote: >>>>>
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/after-nex-benedicts-death-lgbtq-oklahom
ans-vow-to-not-let-the-hate-take-over
After Nex Benedictีs death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to 'not let the hate >>>>>> take over'
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans. This >>>>>> non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died from his >>>>>> injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the country from >>>>>> this but only one political party will have the balls to talk about it. >>>>>> Cowardice, ignorance, and no balls, that sums up the Republican side of >>>>>> the equation.
Another demographic you're curiously unconcerned about Hutt...
In the last week alone, illegal aliens have been arrested for:
--Murdering a college student in Georgia
--Murdering a 2-year-old boy in Maryland
--Raping a minor in Virginia
--Raping a minor at knifepoint in Louisiana
--Shooting three DC police officers
But that's all down to Joe Biden's border policies. No Republicans to blame
so Hutt doesn't care.
Make you wonder what last week's top-five rap sheet would look like for >>>> any other demographic. Well, maybe not Rhodes scholars...
Doesn't matter. As you note, we have plenty of our own criminals to deal >>> with. There's no reason to be importing them from other countries en
masse.
It's no secret that Venezuela and El Salvador are taking advantage of
Biden's border insanity by throwing open their prisons and letting their >>> worst out on the condition that they leave the country and go to
America. And of course we let them in without vetting them at all,
because our government is either deeply stupid or deeply corrupt.
Nigeria, all the way over in Africa, is doing the same and facilitating
the travel of their murderers and rapists to Mexico so they can mule
themselves north and culturally enrich our cities.
As Trump said once upon a time at the base of an escalator, "They're not >>> sending their best."
Is that the same Trump who's a rapist?
And the same Trump who owes half a billion dollars in fines?
And is it the same Trump who has 91 felony charges pending?
In 4 jurisdictions, both state and federal?
He's your go-to guy for spotting criminals? Wonder why?
Notice how Effa completely avoids the issue in favor of calling Trump
names.
El Salvador hasn't tried to hide the fact that it's emptying its prisons
and dumping thousands of extremely vile criminals into America for us to
deal with and that it's a direct result of Biden's open borders policies.
Trying to defend Biden and justify his obvious malfeasant and
near-traitorous dereliction of duty is way too difficult-- pretty much impossible-- so Effa just calls Trump a bunch of names instead and hopes
you don't notice that he has nothing to say in defense of Dem policies that are getting Americans killed.
On 2/27/24 10:36 PM, Rhino wrote:
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 14:37:32 -0500
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/26/2024 10:56 PM, Rhino wrote:I see. Play some statistical games and "prove" that they're harmless
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 14:22:07 -0500
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/26/2024 1:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:What's YOUR plan to keep men dressed as women from sexually
On Feb 26, 2024 at 1:05:42 AM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com>
wrote:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/after-nex-benedicts-death-lgbtq-oklahomans-vow-to-not-let-the-hate-take-over
After Nex Benedict’s death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to ‘not let the >>>>>>> hate take over’
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans.
This non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died >>>>>>> from his injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the >>>>>>> country from this but only one political party will have the
balls to talk about it.
Oh, Hutt, where were you when a high school girl in Loudoun
County, VA was violently raped in her high school restroom by a
troon boy wearing dress because leftists thought it was a good
idea to let boys into girls' restrooms? (And then the high school
admin tried to cover it up and had the girl's father arrested for
trying to expose the whole vile incident at a school board
meeting.)
You don't seem to care about kids being violently attacked by
other kids if you can't point one of your grotesque claws at it
and screech "Republicans!"
Rape-prevention should in no way depend on keeping restrooms
segregated.
assaulting women? A pinky swear from the man that he'll never use
his dick in a non-consensual way? Security guards between the real
women and the pretend-women? Or the usual leftist way: pretend
it'll never happen, then deny that it happened when it does?
*MY* plan might first determine whether transvestite men are actually
*less* likely to be rapists than the male population as a whole.
(or at least more harmless) than straight men, then argue that no
special precautions need to be taken. After all, we know very
well that statistics are NEVER abused. Awesome solution.... </sarc>
By "statistical games" you mean math and statistics right? Sometimes statistics are pretty damned clear.
On 2/28/24 11:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Feb 26, 2024 at 1:05:42 AM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/after-nex-benedicts-death-lgbtq-oklahomans-vow-to-not-let-the-hate-take-over
After Nex Benedict’s death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to 'not let the hate >>> take over'
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans. This
non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died from his
injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the country from
this but only one political party will have the balls to talk about it.
Cowardice, ignorance, and no balls, that sums up the Republican side of
the equation.
Another demographic you're curiously unconcerned about Hutt...
In the last week alone, illegal aliens have been arrested for:
--Murdering a college student in Georgia
--Murdering a 2-year-old boy in Maryland
--Raping a minor in Virginia
--Raping a minor at knifepoint in Louisiana
--Shooting three DC police officers
But that's all down to Joe Biden's border policies. No Republicans to
blame so
Hutt doesn't care.
Again, Thanny the Liar strikes!
Nevermind that violent crime rates, especially for homicide in large
cities, have fallen sharply during Biden’s presidency, after a surge
during the pandemic. Trump, as he often did during his presidency, is
using anecdotal evidence to make an emotional case against
undocumented immigrants.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/02/29/truth-about-illegal-immigration-crime/
On 2/29/24 1:36 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article
<17b8668d2dfab92e$44068$2730048$52d51861@news.newsdemon.com>,
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/28/2024 11:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Feb 26, 2024 at 1:05:42 AM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> wrote: >>>>
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/after-nex-benedicts-death-lgbtq-oklahom
ans-vow-to-not-let-the-hate-take-over
After Nex Benedictีs death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to 'not let the hate >>>>> take over'
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans. This
non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died from his >>>>> injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the country from
this but only one political party will have the balls to talk about
it.
Cowardice, ignorance, and no balls, that sums up the Republican
side of
the equation.
Another demographic you're curiously unconcerned about Hutt...
In the last week alone, illegal aliens have been arrested for:
--Murdering a college student in Georgia
--Murdering a 2-year-old boy in Maryland
--Raping a minor in Virginia
--Raping a minor at knifepoint in Louisiana
--Shooting three DC police officers
But that's all down to Joe Biden's border policies. No Republicans
to blame
so Hutt doesn't care.
Make you wonder what last week's top-five rap sheet would look like for
any other demographic. Well, maybe not Rhodes scholars...
Doesn't matter. As you note, we have plenty of our own criminals to deal
with. There's no reason to be importing them from other countries en
masse.
It's no secret that Venezuela and El Salvador are taking advantage of
Biden's border insanity by throwing open their prisons and letting their
worst out on the condition that they leave the country and go to
America. And of course we let them in without vetting them at all,
because our government is either deeply stupid or deeply corrupt.
Nigeria, all the way over in Africa, is doing the same and facilitating
the travel of their murderers and rapists to Mexico so they can mule
themselves north and culturally enrich our cities.
As Trump said once upon a time at the base of an escalator, "They're not
sending their best."
Is that the same Trump who's a rapist?
And the same Trump who owes half a billion dollars in fines?
And is it the same Trump who has 91 felony charges pending?
In 4 jurisdictions, both state and federal?
He's your go-to guy for spotting criminals? Wonder why?
On 2/28/24 1:24 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <17b7ea21d814d87c$23$762855$cd54664@news.newsdemon.com>,
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/27/2024 7:37 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article
<17b7dd6b665e79cf$44014$2730048$52d51861@news.newsdemon.com>,
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/27/2024 5:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article
<17b7d5437485e1df$26069$2757267$c4d58e68@news.newsdemon.com>,
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/27/2024 3:59 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/26/2024 10:56 PM, Rhino wrote:
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 14:22:07 -0500
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/26/2024 1:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Feb 26, 2024 at 1:05:42 AM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/after-nex-benedicts-death-lgbtq
-oklahomans-vow-to-not-let-the-hate-take-over
After Nex Benedict's death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to 'not let the
hate take over'
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans. >>>>>>>>>>>>> This non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died
from his injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the >>>>>>>>>>>>> country from this but only one political party will have the balls
to talk about it.
Oh, Hutt, where were you when a high school girl in Loudoun County,
VA was violently raped in her high school restroom by a troon boy >>>>>>>>>>>> wearing dress because leftists thought it was a good idea to let >>>>>>>>>>>> boys into girls' restrooms? (And then the high school admin tried >>>>>>>>>>>> to cover it up and had the girl's father arrested for trying to >>>>>>>>>>>> expose the whole vile incident at a school board meeting.) >>>>>>>>>>>>
You don't seem to care about kids being violently attacked by other
kids if you can't point one of your grotesque claws at it and >>>>>>>>>>>> screech "Republicans!"
Then make that argument, without crying "Rape!".
But... there was a rape.
I'd be willing to bet that the vast, vast majority of restroom rapes
(and there seem to be plenty) don't involve transvestitism. Seizing on >>> one that does seems somewhere between odd and deliberately misleading.
But... the only reason this rape happened was because the boy put on a
dress and all the female students were told that boys in dresses are now
allowed to be in your restrooms, changing rooms, locker rooms, and
showers, your rights to privacy be damned.
And yet a representative sampling of one still isn't statistically significant.
On Feb 26, 2024 at 1:05:42 AM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/after-nex-benedicts-death-lgbtq-oklahomans-vow-to-not-let-the-hate-take-over
After Nex Benedict’s death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to 'not let the hate
take over'
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans. This
non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died from his
injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the country from
this but only one political party will have the balls to talk about it.
Cowardice, ignorance, and no balls, that sums up the Republican side of
the equation.
Another demographic you're curiously unconcerned about Hutt...
In the last week alone, illegal aliens have been arrested for:
--Murdering a college student in Georgia
--Murdering a 2-year-old boy in Maryland
--Raping a minor in Virginia
--Raping a minor at knifepoint in Louisiana
--Shooting three DC police officers
But that's all down to Joe Biden's border policies. No Republicans to blame so
Hutt doesn't care.
I'd be willing to bet that the vast, vast majority of restroom rapes
(and there seem to be plenty) don't involve transvestitism. Seizing on
one that does seems somewhere between odd and deliberately misleading.
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 14:37:32 -0500, moviePig <never@nothere.com>
wrote:
*MY* plan might first determine whether transvestite men are actually
*less* likely to be rapists than the male population as a whole.
Surely it's completely obvious that one is too many....
*MY* plan might first determine whether transvestite men are actually
*less* likely to be rapists than the male population as a whole.
"trotsky" wrote:
On 2/28/24 11:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
After Nex Benedict’s death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to 'not let the hate >>>> take over'
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans. This
non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died from his
injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the country from
this but only one political party will have the balls to talk about it. >>>> Cowardice, ignorance, and no balls, that sums up the Republican side of >>>> the equation.
Another demographic you're curiously unconcerned about Hutt...
In the last week alone, illegal aliens have been arrested for:
--Murdering a college student in Georgia
--Murdering a 2-year-old boy in Maryland
--Raping a minor in Virginia
--Raping a minor at knifepoint in Louisiana
--Shooting three DC police officers
But that's all down to Joe Biden's border policies. No Republicans to
blame so Hutt doesn't care.
Again, Thanny the Liar strikes!
Ad hominem noted. Get back to us when you have a real argument to make.
--
Let's go Brandon!
On Mar 1, 2024 at 1:22:56 PM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
On 2/28/24 1:24 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
But... the only reason this rape happened was because the boy put on a
dress and all the female students were told that boys in dresses are now >>> allowed to be in your restrooms, changing rooms, locker rooms, and
showers, your rights to privacy be damned.
And yet a representative sampling of one still isn't statistically
significant.
Weird you seemed to have forgotten about that when you posted about Nex >Benedict, Hutt.
You post about one anecdotal incident and it's supposed to have far-reaching >implications. I post one in response and you vomit out your usual "a >representative sampling of one still isn't statistically significant" tripe.
Double standards. If you didn't have them, you'd have no standards at all.
On 3/1/24 4:33 PM, trotsky wrote:
On 3/1/24 12:39 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2/29/24 1:36 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article
<17b8668d2dfab92e$44068$2730048$52d51861@news.newsdemon.com>,
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/28/2024 11:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Feb 26, 2024 at 1:05:42 AM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> >>>>>>> wrote:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/after-nex-benedicts-death-lgbtq-oklahom
ans-vow-to-not-let-the-hate-take-over
After Nex Benedictีs death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to 'not let the >>>>>>>> hate
take over'
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans. This >>>>>>>> non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died
from his
injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the country from >>>>>>>> this but only one political party will have the balls to talk
about it.
Cowardice, ignorance, and no balls, that sums up the Republican >>>>>>>> side of
the equation.
Another demographic you're curiously unconcerned about Hutt...
In the last week alone, illegal aliens have been arrested for:
--Murdering a college student in Georgia
--Murdering a 2-year-old boy in Maryland
--Raping a minor in Virginia
--Raping a minor at knifepoint in Louisiana
--Shooting three DC police officers
But that's all down to Joe Biden's border policies. No
Republicans to blame
so Hutt doesn't care.
Make you wonder what last week's top-five rap sheet would look
like for
any other demographic. Well, maybe not Rhodes scholars...
Doesn't matter. As you note, we have plenty of our own criminals to
deal
with. There's no reason to be importing them from other countries en >>>>> masse.
It's no secret that Venezuela and El Salvador are taking advantage of >>>>> Biden's border insanity by throwing open their prisons and letting
their
worst out on the condition that they leave the country and go to
America. And of course we let them in without vetting them at all,
because our government is either deeply stupid or deeply corrupt.
Nigeria, all the way over in Africa, is doing the same and
facilitating
the travel of their murderers and rapists to Mexico so they can mule >>>>> themselves north and culturally enrich our cities.
As Trump said once upon a time at the base of an escalator,
"They're not
sending their best."
Is that the same Trump who's a rapist?
And the same Trump who owes half a billion dollars in fines?
And is it the same Trump who has 91 felony charges pending?
In 4 jurisdictions, both state and federal?
He's your go-to guy for spotting criminals? Wonder why?
Notice how Effa completely avoids the issue in favor of calling Trump
names.
OH FOR FUCK'S SAKE ARE YOU REALLY CALLING HIM OUT FOR CHANGING THE
NARRATIVE YOU STUPID COCKSUCKING MOTHEFUCKING HYPOCRITE?
El Salvador hasn't tried to hide the fact that it's emptying its prisons >>> and dumping thousands of extremely vile criminals into America for us to >>> deal with and that it's a direct result of Biden's open borders
policies.
Trying to defend Biden and justify his obvious malfeasant and
near-traitorous dereliction of duty is way too difficult-- pretty much
impossible-- so Effa just calls Trump a bunch of names instead and hopes >>> you don't notice that he has nothing to say in defense of Dem
policies that
are getting Americans killed.
FUCK OFF OATH KEEPER TROON.
Now, now... you'll hurt his feelings if you call the fucking snowflake a name.
On 3/1/24 1:39 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2/29/24 12:46 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 2/28/2024 11:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote:Biden and the Dems HAVE a border solution, and it has enough votes to
On Feb 26, 2024 at 1:05:42 AM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com>Make you wonder what last week's top-five rap sheet would look like for >>>> any other demographic. Well, maybe not Rhodes scholars...
wrote:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/after-nex-benedicts-death-lgbtq-oklahomans-vow-to-not-let-the-hate-take-over
After Nex Benedict’s death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to 'not let the >>>>>> hate
take over'
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans. This >>>>>> non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died from his >>>>>> injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the country from >>>>>> this but only one political party will have the balls to talk
about it.
Cowardice, ignorance, and no balls, that sums up the Republican
side of
the equation.
Another demographic you're curiously unconcerned about Hutt...
In the last week alone, illegal aliens have been arrested for:
--Murdering a college student in Georgia
--Murdering a 2-year-old boy in Maryland
--Raping a minor in Virginia
--Raping a minor at knifepoint in Louisiana
--Shooting three DC police officers
But that's all down to Joe Biden's border policies. No Republicans to >>>>> blame so
Hutt doesn't care.
pass both houses.
That bill will allow 3000-5000 illegals per day to continue to flow
unvetted into America. That's not a 'solution', that's merely
codifying the
chaos into law and it was rightly rejected.
Republicans don't want a border solution, they want an issue to run on.
And after three years of an absolute Dem-induced free-for-all at the
border
where more illegals than the population of Wisconsin were allowed to
enter
unchecked and unvetted, Dems suddenly decide to pretend they want to do
something about it so that issue isn't available for Republicans to use
against them.
But even their 'solution' is no solution at all. Just more of the same
but
now the free-for-all would be legalized.
THIS WAS A REPUBLICAN SOLUTION, MORON.
Republicans themselves said this is the most far reaching bill, and
includes everything they've been asking for for 20 years.
On 3/1/24 5:08 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 1, 2024 at 1:22:56 PM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
On 2/28/24 1:24 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <17b7ea21d814d87c$23$762855$cd54664@news.newsdemon.com>,
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/27/2024 7:37 PM, BTR1701 wrote:But... the only reason this rape happened was because the boy put on a >>>> dress and all the female students were told that boys in dresses are now >>>> allowed to be in your restrooms, changing rooms, locker rooms, and
In article
<17b7dd6b665e79cf$44014$2730048$52d51861@news.newsdemon.com>,
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/27/2024 5:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article
<17b7d5437485e1df$26069$2757267$c4d58e68@news.newsdemon.com>,
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/27/2024 3:59 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/26/2024 10:56 PM, Rhino wrote:
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 14:22:07 -0500
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/26/2024 1:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Feb 26, 2024 at 1:05:42 AM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/after-nex-benedicts-death-lgbtq
-oklahomans-vow-to-not-let-the-hate-take-over
After Nex Benedict's death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to 'not let the
hate take over'
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died
from his injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the
country from this but only one political party will have the balls
to talk about it.
Oh, Hutt, where were you when a high school girl in Loudoun County,
VA was violently raped in her high school restroom by a troon boy
wearing dress because leftists thought it was a good idea to let >>>>>>>>>>>>>> boys into girls' restrooms? (And then the high school admin tried
to cover it up and had the girl's father arrested for trying to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> expose the whole vile incident at a school board meeting.) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You don't seem to care about kids being violently attacked by other
kids if you can't point one of your grotesque claws at it and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> screech "Republicans!"
Then make that argument, without crying "Rape!".
But... there was a rape.
I'd be willing to bet that the vast, vast majority of restroom rapes >>>>> (and there seem to be plenty) don't involve transvestitism. Seizing on >>>>> one that does seems somewhere between odd and deliberately misleading. >>>>
showers, your rights to privacy be damned.
And yet a representative sampling of one still isn't statistically
significant.
Weird you seemed to have forgotten about that when you posted about Nex
Benedict, Hutt.
You post about one anecdotal incident and it's supposed to have far-reaching >> implications. I post one in response and you vomit out your usual "a
representative sampling of one still isn't statistically significant" tripe. >>
Double standards. If you didn't have them, you'd have no standards at all.
But you have no problem singling out one illegal who committed a murder, right?
Because it isn't anecdotal when you do it.
FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
BTR1701 wrote:
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/28/2024 11:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Feb 26, 2024 at 1:05:42 AM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
After Nex Benedictีs death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to 'not let the >>>>>> hate take over'
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans. This >>>>>> non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died from his >>>>>> injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the country from >>>>>> this but only one political party will have the balls to talk about >>>>>> it. Cowardice, ignorance, and no balls, that sums up the Republican >>>>>> side of the equation.
Another demographic you're curiously unconcerned about Hutt...
In the last week alone, illegal aliens have been arrested for:
--Murdering a college student in Georgia
--Murdering a 2-year-old boy in Maryland
--Raping a minor in Virginia
--Raping a minor at knifepoint in Louisiana
--Shooting three DC police officers
But that's all down to Joe Biden's border policies. No Republicans to >>>>> blame so Hutt doesn't care.
Make you wonder what last week's top-five rap sheet would look like for >>>> any other demographic. Well, maybe not Rhodes scholars...
Doesn't matter. As you note, we have plenty of our own criminals to deal >>> with. There's no reason to be importing them from other countries en
masse.
It's no secret that Venezuela and El Salvador are taking advantage of
Biden's border insanity by throwing open their prisons and letting their >>> worst out on the condition that they leave the country and go to
America. And of course we let them in without vetting them at all,
because our government is either deeply stupid or deeply corrupt.
Nigeria, all the way over in Africa, is doing the same and facilitating
the travel of their murderers and rapists to Mexico so they can mule
themselves north and culturally enrich our cities.
As Trump said once upon a time at the base of an escalator, "They're not >>> sending their best."
Is that the same Trump who's a rapist?
And the same Trump who owes half a billion dollars in fines?
And is it the same Trump who has 91 felony charges pending?
In 4 jurisdictions, both state and federal?
He's your go-to guy for spotting criminals? Wonder why?
Notice how Effa completely avoids the issue in favor of calling Trump
names.
On 3/1/24 12:39 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
Someone pretending to be FPP wrote:
On 2/29/24 1:36 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
It's no secret that Venezuela and El Salvador are taking advantage of
Biden's border insanity by throwing open their prisons and letting their >>>> worst out on the condition that they leave the country and go to
America. And of course we let them in without vetting them at all,
because our government is either deeply stupid or deeply corrupt.
Nigeria, all the way over in Africa, is doing the same and facilitating >>>> the travel of their murderers and rapists to Mexico so they can mule
themselves north and culturally enrich our cities.
As Trump said once upon a time at the base of an escalator, "They're not >>>> sending their best."
Is that the same Trump who's a rapist?
And the same Trump who owes half a billion dollars in fines?
And is it the same Trump who has 91 felony charges pending?
In 4 jurisdictions, both state and federal?
He's your go-to guy for spotting criminals? Wonder why?
Notice how Effa completely avoids the issue in favor of calling Trump
names.
OH FOR FUCK'S SAKE ARE YOU REALLY CALLING HIM OUT FOR CHANGING THE
NARRATIVE YOU STUPID COCKSUCKING MOTHEFUCKING HYPOCRITE?
On 3/1/24 1:39 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:THIS WAS A REPUBLICAN SOLUTION, MORON.
On 2/29/24 12:46 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 2/28/2024 11:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote:Biden and the Dems HAVE a border solution, and it has enough votes to
On Feb 26, 2024 at 1:05:42 AM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> wrote: >>>>>Make you wonder what last week's top-five rap sheet would look like for >>>> any other demographic. Well, maybe not Rhodes scholars...
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/after-nex-benedicts-death-lgbtq-oklahomans-vow-to-not-let-the-hate-take-over
After Nex Benedict’s death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to 'not let the hate
take over'
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans. This >>>>>> non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died from his >>>>>> injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the country from >>>>>> this but only one political party will have the balls to talk about it. >>>>>> Cowardice, ignorance, and no balls, that sums up the Republican side of >>>>>> the equation.
Another demographic you're curiously unconcerned about Hutt...
In the last week alone, illegal aliens have been arrested for:
--Murdering a college student in Georgia
--Murdering a 2-year-old boy in Maryland
--Raping a minor in Virginia
--Raping a minor at knifepoint in Louisiana
--Shooting three DC police officers
But that's all down to Joe Biden's border policies. No Republicans to >>>>> blame so
Hutt doesn't care.
pass both houses.
That bill will allow 3000-5000 illegals per day to continue to flow
unvetted into America. That's not a 'solution', that's merely codifying the >> chaos into law and it was rightly rejected.
Republicans don't want a border solution, they want an issue to run on.
And after three years of an absolute Dem-induced free-for-all at the border >> where more illegals than the population of Wisconsin were allowed to enter >> unchecked and unvetted, Dems suddenly decide to pretend they want to do
something about it so that issue isn't available for Republicans to use
against them.
But even their 'solution' is no solution at all. Just more of the same but >> now the free-for-all would be legalized.
Republicans themselves said this is the most far reaching bill, and
includes everything they've been asking for for 20 years.
FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/1/24 5:08 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 1, 2024 at 1:22:56 PM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
On 2/28/24 1:24 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <17b7ea21d814d87c$23$762855$cd54664@news.newsdemon.com>,
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/27/2024 7:37 PM, BTR1701 wrote:But... the only reason this rape happened was because the boy put on a >>>>> dress and all the female students were told that boys in dresses are now >>>>> allowed to be in your restrooms, changing rooms, locker rooms, and
In article
<17b7dd6b665e79cf$44014$2730048$52d51861@news.newsdemon.com>,
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/27/2024 5:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article
<17b7d5437485e1df$26069$2757267$c4d58e68@news.newsdemon.com>, >>>>>>>>> moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/27/2024 3:59 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/26/2024 10:56 PM, Rhino wrote:
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 14:22:07 -0500
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 2/26/2024 1:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Feb 26, 2024 at 1:05:42 AM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com>
wrote:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/after-nex-benedicts-death-lgbtq
-oklahomans-vow-to-not-let-the-hate-take-over
After Nex Benedict's death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to 'not let the
hate take over'
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died
from his injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the
country from this but only one political party will have the balls
to talk about it.
Oh, Hutt, where were you when a high school girl in Loudoun County,
VA was violently raped in her high school restroom by a troon boy
wearing dress because leftists thought it was a good idea to let
boys into girls' restrooms? (And then the high school admin tried
to cover it up and had the girl's father arrested for trying to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expose the whole vile incident at a school board meeting.) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You don't seem to care about kids being violently attacked by other
kids if you can't point one of your grotesque claws at it and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> screech "Republicans!"
Then make that argument, without crying "Rape!".
But... there was a rape.
I'd be willing to bet that the vast, vast majority of restroom rapes >>>>>> (and there seem to be plenty) don't involve transvestitism. Seizing on >>>>>> one that does seems somewhere between odd and deliberately misleading. >>>>>
showers, your rights to privacy be damned.
And yet a representative sampling of one still isn't statistically
significant.
Weird you seemed to have forgotten about that when you posted about Nex
Benedict, Hutt.
You post about one anecdotal incident and it's supposed to have far-reaching
implications. I post one in response and you vomit out your usual "a
representative sampling of one still isn't statistically significant" tripe.
Double standards. If you didn't have them, you'd have no standards at all. >>
But you have no problem singling out one illegal who committed a murder,
right?
Because it isn't anecdotal when you do it.
I'm not the one complaining about it, dimwit. Your remora Hutt is while
doing the exact thing he's complaining about. He's the hypocrite here, not me.
FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/1/24 1:39 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2/29/24 12:46 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 2/28/2024 11:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote:Biden and the Dems HAVE a border solution, and it has enough votes to
On Feb 26, 2024 at 1:05:42 AM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> wrote: >>>>>>Make you wonder what last week's top-five rap sheet would look like for >>>>> any other demographic. Well, maybe not Rhodes scholars...
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/after-nex-benedicts-death-lgbtq-oklahomans-vow-to-not-let-the-hate-take-over
After Nex Benedict’s death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to 'not let the hate
take over'
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans. This >>>>>>> non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died from his >>>>>>> injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the country from >>>>>>> this but only one political party will have the balls to talk about it. >>>>>>> Cowardice, ignorance, and no balls, that sums up the Republican side of >>>>>>> the equation.
Another demographic you're curiously unconcerned about Hutt...
In the last week alone, illegal aliens have been arrested for:
--Murdering a college student in Georgia
--Murdering a 2-year-old boy in Maryland
--Raping a minor in Virginia
--Raping a minor at knifepoint in Louisiana
--Shooting three DC police officers
But that's all down to Joe Biden's border policies. No Republicans to >>>>>> blame so
Hutt doesn't care.
pass both houses.
That bill will allow 3000-5000 illegals per day to continue to flow
unvetted into America. That's not a 'solution', that's merely codifying the >>> chaos into law and it was rightly rejected.
And after three years of an absolute Dem-induced free-for-all at the border >>> where more illegals than the population of Wisconsin were allowed to enter >>> unchecked and unvetted, Dems suddenly decide to pretend they want to do
Republicans don't want a border solution, they want an issue to run on. >>>
something about it so that issue isn't available for Republicans to use
against them.
But even their 'solution' is no solution at all. Just more of the same but >>> now the free-for-all would be legalized.
THIS WAS A REPUBLICAN SOLUTION, MORON.
Republicans themselves said this is the most far reaching bill, and
includes everything they've been asking for for 20 years.
And those Republicans are lying just as much as the Dems are if they're saying this bill actually secured the border and stops the firehose of illegal aliens.
On Mar 4, 2024 at 5:56:21 AM PST, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/1/24 1:39 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:THIS WAS A REPUBLICAN SOLUTION, MORON.
On 2/29/24 12:46 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 2/28/2024 11:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote:Biden and the Dems HAVE a border solution, and it has enough votes to >>>> pass both houses.
On Feb 26, 2024 at 1:05:42 AM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:Make you wonder what last week's top-five rap sheet would look like for >>>>> any other demographic. Well, maybe not Rhodes scholars...
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/after-nex-benedicts-death-lgbtq-oklahomans-vow-to-not-let-the-hate-take-over
After Nex Benedict’s death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to 'not let the hate
take over'
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans. This >>>>>>> non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died from his >>>>>>> injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the country from >>>>>>> this but only one political party will have the balls to talk about it.
Cowardice, ignorance, and no balls, that sums up the Republican side of
the equation.
Another demographic you're curiously unconcerned about Hutt...
In the last week alone, illegal aliens have been arrested for:
--Murdering a college student in Georgia
--Murdering a 2-year-old boy in Maryland
--Raping a minor in Virginia
--Raping a minor at knifepoint in Louisiana
--Shooting three DC police officers
But that's all down to Joe Biden's border policies. No Republicans to >>>>>> blame so
Hutt doesn't care.
That bill will allow 3000-5000 illegals per day to continue to flow
unvetted into America. That's not a 'solution', that's merely codifying the
chaos into law and it was rightly rejected.
And after three years of an absolute Dem-induced free-for-all at the border
Republicans don't want a border solution, they want an issue to run on. >>>
where more illegals than the population of Wisconsin were allowed to enter
unchecked and unvetted, Dems suddenly decide to pretend they want to do >>> something about it so that issue isn't available for Republicans to use >>> against them.
But even their 'solution' is no solution at all. Just more of the same but
now the free-for-all would be legalized.
Republicans themselves said this is the most far reaching bill, and
includes everything they've been asking for for 20 years.
The week Biden took office, he issued 94 executive orders to open the border and stand down enforcement of immigration law.
Until Biden rescinds those EOs, any claims he makes that he wants to address illegal immigration are nothing but lies.
On Mar 1, 2024 at 10:08:34 PM PST, atropos@mac.com wrote:
On Mar 1, 2024 at 1:22:56 PM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
On 2/28/24 1:24 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
But... the only reason this rape happened was because the boy put on a >>>> dress and all the female students were told that boys in dresses are now >>>> allowed to be in your restrooms, changing rooms, locker rooms, and
showers, your rights to privacy be damned.
And yet a representative sampling of one still isn't statistically
significant.
Weird you seemed to have forgotten about that when you posted about Nex
Benedict, Hutt.
You post about one anecdotal incident and it's supposed to have far-reaching >> implications. I post one in response and you vomit out your usual "a
representative sampling of one still isn't statistically significant" tripe. >>
Double standards. If you didn't have them, you'd have no standards at all.
And "trotsky" has suddenly broken his compulsion to post a followup to everything you post to RAT-U....
gmsingh@email.com wrote:
On 3/1/24 12:39 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
Someone pretending to be FPP wrote:
On 2/29/24 1:36 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
It's no secret that Venezuela and El Salvador are taking advantage of >>>>> Biden's border insanity by throwing open their prisons and letting their >>>>> worst out on the condition that they leave the country and go to
America. And of course we let them in without vetting them at all,
because our government is either deeply stupid or deeply corrupt.
Nigeria, all the way over in Africa, is doing the same and facilitating >>>>> the travel of their murderers and rapists to Mexico so they can mule >>>>> themselves north and culturally enrich our cities.
As Trump said once upon a time at the base of an escalator, "They're not >>>>> sending their best."
Is that the same Trump who's a rapist?
And the same Trump who owes half a billion dollars in fines?
And is it the same Trump who has 91 felony charges pending?
In 4 jurisdictions, both state and federal?
He's your go-to guy for spotting criminals? Wonder why?
Notice how Effa completely avoids the issue in favor of calling Trump
names.
OH FOR FUCK'S SAKE ARE YOU REALLY CALLING HIM OUT FOR CHANGING THE
NARRATIVE YOU STUPID COCKSUCKING MOTHEFUCKING HYPOCRITE?
Looks like "trotsky" forgot whoich account he is posting from again.
Perhaps you shouldn't post followups before regaining your compuser, boyo.
On 3/4/24 3:30 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:
On Mar 1, 2024 at 10:08:34 PM PST, atropos@mac.com wrote:
On Mar 1, 2024 at 1:22:56 PM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
On 2/28/24 1:24 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
But... the only reason this rape happened was because the boy put >>>>> on a
dress and all the female students were told that boys in dresses
are now
allowed to be in your restrooms, changing rooms, locker rooms, and >>>>> showers, your rights to privacy be damned.
And yet a representative sampling of one still isn't statistically
significant.
Weird you seemed to have forgotten about that when you posted about Nex
Benedict, Hutt.
You post about one anecdotal incident and it's supposed to have
far-reaching
implications. I post one in response and you vomit out your usual "a
representative sampling of one still isn't statistically significant"
tripe.
Double standards. If you didn't have them, you'd have no standards at
all.
And "trotsky" has suddenly broken his compulsion to post a followup to
everything you post to RAT-U....
Fucked in the head as ever Pubie. Is that why I have the most posts in
this thread?
FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/1/24 1:39 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2/29/24 12:46 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 2/28/2024 11:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote:Biden and the Dems HAVE a border solution, and it has enough votes to
On Feb 26, 2024 at 1:05:42 AM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> wrote: >>>>>>Make you wonder what last week's top-five rap sheet would look like for >>>>> any other demographic. Well, maybe not Rhodes scholars...
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/after-nex-benedicts-death-lgbtq-oklahomans-vow-to-not-let-the-hate-take-over
After Nex Benedict’s death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to 'not let the hate
take over'
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans. This >>>>>>> non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died from his >>>>>>> injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the country from >>>>>>> this but only one political party will have the balls to talk about it. >>>>>>> Cowardice, ignorance, and no balls, that sums up the Republican side of >>>>>>> the equation.
Another demographic you're curiously unconcerned about Hutt...
In the last week alone, illegal aliens have been arrested for:
--Murdering a college student in Georgia
--Murdering a 2-year-old boy in Maryland
--Raping a minor in Virginia
--Raping a minor at knifepoint in Louisiana
--Shooting three DC police officers
But that's all down to Joe Biden's border policies. No Republicans to >>>>>> blame so
Hutt doesn't care.
pass both houses.
That bill will allow 3000-5000 illegals per day to continue to flow
unvetted into America. That's not a 'solution', that's merely codifying the >>> chaos into law and it was rightly rejected.
And after three years of an absolute Dem-induced free-for-all at the border >>> where more illegals than the population of Wisconsin were allowed to enter >>> unchecked and unvetted, Dems suddenly decide to pretend they want to do
Republicans don't want a border solution, they want an issue to run on. >>>
something about it so that issue isn't available for Republicans to use
against them.
But even their 'solution' is no solution at all. Just more of the same but >>> now the free-for-all would be legalized.
THIS WAS A REPUBLICAN SOLUTION, MORON.
Republicans themselves said this is the most far reaching bill, and
includes everything they've been asking for for 20 years.
And those Republicans are lying just as much as the Dems are if they're saying this bill actually secured the border and stops the firehose of illegal aliens.
On 3/4/24 1:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 4, 2024 at 5:56:21 AM PST, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
Republicans themselves said this is the most far reaching bill, and
includes everything they've been asking for for 20 years.
The week Biden took office, he issued 94 executive orders to open the border and stand down enforcement of immigration law.
Until Biden rescinds those EOs, any claims he makes that he wants to address illegal immigration are nothing but lies.
So answer his question. What was in the bill that was bad?
The Republicans got most of what they wanted and that still wasn't
good enough
On 3/4/24 3:30 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:
On Mar 1, 2024 at 10:08:34 PM PST, atropos@mac.com wrote:
On Mar 1, 2024 at 1:22:56 PM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
On 2/28/24 1:24 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
And "trotsky" has suddenly broken his compulsion to post a followup toBut... the only reason this rape happened was because the boy put on a >>>>> dress and all the female students were told that boys in dresses are now >>>>> allowed to be in your restrooms, changing rooms, locker rooms, and
showers, your rights to privacy be damned.
And yet a representative sampling of one still isn't statistically
significant.
Weird you seemed to have forgotten about that when you posted about Nex
Benedict, Hutt.
You post about one anecdotal incident and it's supposed to have far-reaching
implications. I post one in response and you vomit out your usual "a
representative sampling of one still isn't statistically significant" tripe.
Double standards. If you didn't have them, you'd have no standards at all. >>
everything you post to RAT-U....
Is that why I have the most posts in this thread?
On Mar 4, 2024 at 5:56:21 AM PST, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/1/24 1:39 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:THIS WAS A REPUBLICAN SOLUTION, MORON.
On 2/29/24 12:46 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 2/28/2024 11:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote:Biden and the Dems HAVE a border solution, and it has enough votes to >>>> pass both houses.
On Feb 26, 2024 at 1:05:42 AM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:Make you wonder what last week's top-five rap sheet would look like for >>>>> any other demographic. Well, maybe not Rhodes scholars...
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/after-nex-benedicts-death-lgbtq-oklahomans-vow-to-not-let-the-hate-take-over
After Nex Benedict’s death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to 'not let the hate
take over'
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans. This >>>>>>> non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died from his >>>>>>> injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the country from >>>>>>> this but only one political party will have the balls to talk about it.
Cowardice, ignorance, and no balls, that sums up the Republican side of
the equation.
Another demographic you're curiously unconcerned about Hutt...
In the last week alone, illegal aliens have been arrested for:
--Murdering a college student in Georgia
--Murdering a 2-year-old boy in Maryland
--Raping a minor in Virginia
--Raping a minor at knifepoint in Louisiana
--Shooting three DC police officers
But that's all down to Joe Biden's border policies. No Republicans to >>>>>> blame so
Hutt doesn't care.
That bill will allow 3000-5000 illegals per day to continue to flow
unvetted into America. That's not a 'solution', that's merely codifying the
chaos into law and it was rightly rejected.
And after three years of an absolute Dem-induced free-for-all at the border
Republicans don't want a border solution, they want an issue to run on. >>>
where more illegals than the population of Wisconsin were allowed to enter
unchecked and unvetted, Dems suddenly decide to pretend they want to do >>> something about it so that issue isn't available for Republicans to use >>> against them.
But even their 'solution' is no solution at all. Just more of the same but
now the free-for-all would be legalized.
Republicans themselves said this is the most far reaching bill, and
includes everything they've been asking for for 20 years.
The week Biden took office, he issued 94 executive orders to open the border and stand down enforcement of immigration law.
Until Biden rescinds those EOs, any claims he makes that he wants to address illegal immigration are nothing but lies.
In article <usa2h0$g16c$5@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 3/4/24 1:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 4, 2024 at 5:56:21 AM PST, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
Republicans themselves said this is the most far reaching bill, and
includes everything they've been asking for for 20 years.
The week Biden took office, he issued 94 executive orders to open the
border and stand down enforcement of immigration law.
Until Biden rescinds those EOs, any claims he makes that he wants to
address illegal immigration are nothing but lies.
So answer his question. What was in the bill that was bad?
I already did an in-depth analysis of this abomination several weeks
ago,
Trump as per usual. Why should I do it all again just for you to ignore
it again?
Oh, hell, hope springs eternal and it's easy to copy and paste so here
goes:
The Republicans got most of what they wanted and that still wasn't
good enough
Of course it wasn't good enough. And I don't know who you're referring
to specifically by 'the Republicans' but anyone who isn't a RINO got
next to nothing from this bill with regard to border security. And
that's being generous.
Even as hundreds of thousands of illegals stream across the border every month, including thousands of gang members recently kicked out of prison
in places like El Salvador, looking for a friendlier place to commit
their crimes, this 'border deal' would have done absolutely nothing to
secure the border.
First, it's important to emphasize that no 'border deal' is necessary in
the first place. Under existing law, including the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, the president of the United States has the
authority to turn every single illegal alien away at the border if he determines it's necessary to safeguard the country, to include refugees. There is no requirement that we entertain millions of fraudulent asylum claims-- or even legitimate asylum claims, as rare as those may be.
There is no legal requirement that we allow a single non-citizen into
this country. Period.
All that's necessary to secure the border is for the president of the
United States to start doing his damn job and enforcing the law, to
start using the power that he *already* legitimately and
constitutionally has. It doesn't need to be complicated. We just need to start enforcing existing laws as they stand.
But if the White House actually adopted this simple and straightforward solution, two things would happen:
(1) The Democrat Party would lose out on millions of future loyal voters
once the next stage of their plan is implemented: the 'path to
citizenship' for all the illegals we let in and who now will be
described as leading an 'unfair' twilight existence in our society which
can only be solved by making them citizens. Democrats' longstanding
plans for demographic replacement at the polls would be stymied.
(2) Congress would miss out on a chance to launder hundreds of millions
of dollars and Congress never misses out on an opportunity like that.
So here we are.
The bill proposed in the Senate would allocate another $60 billion
dollars in military aid to Ukraine and $14 billion to Israel. (We
already give Israel billions every year-- what have they been doing with that? Where has that money gone that we need to dump $14 billion more on their doorstep?) That's a grand total of $74 billion going to secure the borders of other countries. By comparison, the bill only allocates $20 billion for U.S. border security.
So to restate for the slow kids in the back of the room: Our leaders are proposing to spend roughly 400% more on securing the borders of two
other foreign countries than they are on securing the border of our own country.
And it gets worse. Because even the money that's supposedly going for
our border security will actually in practice only facilitate the entry
of millions of more illegal aliens into the U.S. Specifically, the bill allocates $2.3 billion for something called "refugee and entry
assistance activities" by giving "grants or contracts to qualified organizations and non-profit entities to provide culturally and linguistically appropriate services, including housing, medical, and
legal assistance and ease management assistance". (Ease management assistance? WTF? Why am I paying for that?) So that's more than two
billion dollars to the left-wing 'non-profit' organizations that exist principally to find ways to sneak as many illegals into this country as possible.
By doing so, this bill actually creates more incentives for illegals to
come here in the first place.
One of the highlights of the bill is that it requires the Executive
Branch to close the border on an emergency basis if the number of
illegal entries exceeds 5000 in one week or 8500 in one day.
Except the bill also gives Joe Biden the authority to waive this
emergency requirement at any time at his discretion. So of course it
will never be enforced. He and DHS Secretary Mayorkas could effectively
just ignore this entire section of the law if it were passed.
The bill also doesn't count unaccompanied minors from countries other
than Mexico and Canada toward the totals necessary for border closings.
In other words, a significant percentage of illegals from Haiti, Cuba, Honduras, Pakistan, China, etc. simply don't count. We could have 20,000
of those show up in one day and it wouldn't count.
And on top of that, the bill doesn't *actually* close the border, even
if this fraudulent 5000-illegal threshold is reached. Per one of the
bill's co-authors, Senator Chris Murphy: "The bill contains a
requirement that the president funnel asylum claims to the land ports of entry when more than 5000 people cross in a day. The border never closes
but claims must be processed at the ports."
So basically even if these arbitrary numbers are reached, the border
never closes. The illegals are just re-directed to processing centers
where they are then let into the country. It's a complete scam by
design. And a scam that's designed to last for a long time, given the
bill's 3-year sunset provision. The idea being that if Trump does get re-elected, he'd be bound by the terms of this deal and couldn't do
crazy things like ACTUALLY shut down the border and stop this
never-ending firehose of illegals.
In one key respect, this bill would actually *lessen* the
already-minimal standards for allowing illegals into the country. Right
now, people applying for asylum need to show "a significant possibility
that they can establish a credible fear of persecution on the basis of
race, national origin, political beliefs, etc." Not a high standard. It doesn't require them to provide any actual evidence of their claims.
Just make a claim, which they've been coached to say and which they've rehearsed, and then get into the country. But this border bill would
lower that standard even further, if that's possible, from a
"significant" possibility of persecution to merely a "reasonable"
possibility of persecution. And reasonable is just another way of saying 'plausible'. In other words, it's a bar that anyone from anywhere can
clear. There's no way that anyone claiming asylum will ever get turned
away if that's the standard.
The bill is an abomination that makes the border *less* secure than it already is, which is a remarkable feat that few, if any, people imagined
was even possible.
Thank god the House Republicans said the bill was dead on arrival. But
it doesn't begin to explain why Senate Republicans thought there was
anything here that could possibly be considered good for America.
It's as if the Senate is made up of politicians who despise their own citizens and whose top priority is the safety of foreigners in other countries thousands of miles from their own shores. And they know it.
When you confront them on why they've utterly failed at the border, they don't even try and justify their behavior. They just call you a racist
for even asking the question. There's no political calculation that
would explain their support for this nonsense. The American people,
Democrats and Republicans alike are overwhelmingly upset about what's
going on at the border. There's no support for it.
Polls clearly show that no one's buying the idea that we need a nearly
$100 billion giveaway to Ukraine and Israel in order to do something as
basic as enforcing the law here in America.
Nobody seriously thinks that it's appropriate to pay foreign countries
vast sums of money to secure their borders while we allocate a fraction
of that money to open up our own borders even more. Most Americans want
our leaders to prioritize our country before other countries. It is not
an unreasonable thing for us to want.
On 3/5/24 5:33 AM, trotsky wrote:
On 3/4/24 3:30 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:
On Mar 1, 2024 at 10:08:34 PM PST, atropos@mac.com wrote:
On Mar 1, 2024 at 1:22:56 PM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> wrote: >>>>> On 2/28/24 1:24 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
But... the only reason this rape happened was because the boy
put on a
dress and all the female students were told that boys in dresses >>>>>> are now
allowed to be in your restrooms, changing rooms, locker rooms, and >>>>>> showers, your rights to privacy be damned.
And yet a representative sampling of one still isn't statistically
significant.
Weird you seemed to have forgotten about that when you posted about Nex >>>> Benedict, Hutt.
You post about one anecdotal incident and it's supposed to have
far-reaching
implications. I post one in response and you vomit out your usual "a
representative sampling of one still isn't statistically
significant" tripe.
Double standards. If you didn't have them, you'd have no standards
at all.
And "trotsky" has suddenly broken his compulsion to post a followup to
everything you post to RAT-U....
Fucked in the head as ever Pubie. Is that why I have the most posts
in this thread?
Fuck, how is he still alive?
On 3/2/2024 2:16 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 14:37:32 -0500, moviePig <never@nothere.com>
wrote:
*MY* plan might first determine whether transvestite men are actually
*less* likely to be rapists than the male population as a whole.
Surely it's completely obvious that one is too many....
One in ten, yes. One in ten million, we should be so lucky...
On 3/6/24 12:45 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <usa2h0$g16c$5@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 3/4/24 1:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 4, 2024 at 5:56:21 AM PST, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
Republicans themselves said this is the most far reaching bill, and
includes everything they've been asking for for 20 years.
The week Biden took office, he issued 94 executive orders to open the
border and stand down enforcement of immigration law.
Until Biden rescinds those EOs, any claims he makes that he wants to
address illegal immigration are nothing but lies.
So answer his question. What was in the bill that was bad?
I already did an in-depth analysis of this abomination several weeks
ago, which you completely ignored and only responded to by insulting
Trump as per usual. Why should I do it all again just for you to ignore
it again?
Oh, hell, hope springs eternal and it's easy to copy and paste so here goes:
The Republicans got most of what they wanted and that still wasn't
good enough
Of course it wasn't good enough. And I don't know who you're referring
to specifically by 'the Republicans' but anyone who isn't a RINO got
next to nothing from this bill with regard to border security. And
that's being generous.
Even as hundreds of thousands of illegals stream across the border every month, including thousands of gang members recently kicked out of prison
in places like El Salvador, looking for a friendlier place to commit
their crimes, this 'border deal' would have done absolutely nothing to secure the border.
First, it's important to emphasize that no 'border deal' is necessary in the first place. Under existing law, including the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, the president of the United States has the authority to turn every single illegal alien away at the border if he determines it's necessary to safeguard the country, to include refugees. There is no requirement that we entertain millions of fraudulent asylum claims-- or even legitimate asylum claims, as rare as those may be.
There is no legal requirement that we allow a single non-citizen into
this country. Period.
All that's necessary to secure the border is for the president of the United States to start doing his damn job and enforcing the law, to
start using the power that he *already* legitimately and
constitutionally has. It doesn't need to be complicated. We just need to start enforcing existing laws as they stand.
But if the White House actually adopted this simple and straightforward solution, two things would happen:
(1) The Democrat Party would lose out on millions of future loyal voters once the next stage of their plan is implemented: the 'path to
citizenship' for all the illegals we let in and who now will be
described as leading an 'unfair' twilight existence in our society which can only be solved by making them citizens. Democrats' longstanding
plans for demographic replacement at the polls would be stymied.
(2) Congress would miss out on a chance to launder hundreds of millions
of dollars and Congress never misses out on an opportunity like that.
So here we are.
The bill proposed in the Senate would allocate another $60 billion
dollars in military aid to Ukraine and $14 billion to Israel. (We
already give Israel billions every year-- what have they been doing with that? Where has that money gone that we need to dump $14 billion more on their doorstep?) That's a grand total of $74 billion going to secure the borders of other countries. By comparison, the bill only allocates $20 billion for U.S. border security.
So to restate for the slow kids in the back of the room: Our leaders are proposing to spend roughly 400% more on securing the borders of two
other foreign countries than they are on securing the border of our own country.
And it gets worse. Because even the money that's supposedly going for
our border security will actually in practice only facilitate the entry
of millions of more illegal aliens into the U.S. Specifically, the bill allocates $2.3 billion for something called "refugee and entry
assistance activities" by giving "grants or contracts to qualified organizations and non-profit entities to provide culturally and linguistically appropriate services, including housing, medical, and
legal assistance and ease management assistance". (Ease management assistance? WTF? Why am I paying for that?) So that's more than two
billion dollars to the left-wing 'non-profit' organizations that exist principally to find ways to sneak as many illegals into this country as possible.
By doing so, this bill actually creates more incentives for illegals to come here in the first place.
One of the highlights of the bill is that it requires the Executive
Branch to close the border on an emergency basis if the number of
illegal entries exceeds 5000 in one week or 8500 in one day.
Except the bill also gives Joe Biden the authority to waive this
emergency requirement at any time at his discretion. So of course it
will never be enforced. He and DHS Secretary Mayorkas could effectively just ignore this entire section of the law if it were passed.
The bill also doesn't count unaccompanied minors from countries other
than Mexico and Canada toward the totals necessary for border closings.
In other words, a significant percentage of illegals from Haiti, Cuba, Honduras, Pakistan, China, etc. simply don't count. We could have 20,000
of those show up in one day and it wouldn't count.
And on top of that, the bill doesn't *actually* close the border, even
if this fraudulent 5000-illegal threshold is reached. Per one of the
bill's co-authors, Senator Chris Murphy: "The bill contains a
requirement that the president funnel asylum claims to the land ports of entry when more than 5000 people cross in a day. The border never closes but claims must be processed at the ports."
So basically even if these arbitrary numbers are reached, the border
never closes. The illegals are just re-directed to processing centers
where they are then let into the country. It's a complete scam by
design. And a scam that's designed to last for a long time, given the bill's 3-year sunset provision. The idea being that if Trump does get re-elected, he'd be bound by the terms of this deal and couldn't do
crazy things like ACTUALLY shut down the border and stop this
never-ending firehose of illegals.
In one key respect, this bill would actually *lessen* the
already-minimal standards for allowing illegals into the country. Right now, people applying for asylum need to show "a significant possibility that they can establish a credible fear of persecution on the basis of race, national origin, political beliefs, etc." Not a high standard. It doesn't require them to provide any actual evidence of their claims.
Just make a claim, which they've been coached to say and which they've rehearsed, and then get into the country. But this border bill would
lower that standard even further, if that's possible, from a
"significant" possibility of persecution to merely a "reasonable" possibility of persecution. And reasonable is just another way of saying 'plausible'. In other words, it's a bar that anyone from anywhere can clear. There's no way that anyone claiming asylum will ever get turned
away if that's the standard.
The bill is an abomination that makes the border *less* secure than it already is, which is a remarkable feat that few, if any, people imagined was even possible.
Thank god the House Republicans said the bill was dead on arrival. But
it doesn't begin to explain why Senate Republicans thought there was anything here that could possibly be considered good for America.
It's as if the Senate is made up of politicians who despise their own citizens and whose top priority is the safety of foreigners in other countries thousands of miles from their own shores. And they know it.
When you confront them on why they've utterly failed at the border, they don't even try and justify their behavior. They just call you a racist
for even asking the question. There's no political calculation that
would explain their support for this nonsense. The American people, Democrats and Republicans alike are overwhelmingly upset about what's
going on at the border. There's no support for it.
Polls clearly show that no one's buying the idea that we need a nearly
$100 billion giveaway to Ukraine and Israel in order to do something as basic as enforcing the law here in America.
Nobody seriously thinks that it's appropriate to pay foreign countries
vast sums of money to secure their borders while we allocate a fraction
of that money to open up our own borders even more. Most Americans want
our leaders to prioritize our country before other countries. It is not
an unreasonable thing for us to want.
Who wouldn't have given ANY amount of money to defeat Hitler in WWII if
it meant no American lives would have been lost?
On 3/6/24 10:49 AM, moviePig wrote:
On 3/4/2024 11:43 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/1/24 1:39 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2/29/24 12:46 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 2/28/2024 11:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote:Biden and the Dems HAVE a border solution, and it has enough votes to >>>>>> pass both houses.
On Feb 26, 2024 at 1:05:42 AM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> >>>>>>>> wrote:Make you wonder what last week's top-five rap sheet would look
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/after-nex-benedicts-death-lgbtq-oklahomans-vow-to-not-let-the-hate-take-over
After Nex Benedict’s death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to 'not let >>>>>>>>> the hate
take over'
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans. >>>>>>>>> This
non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died >>>>>>>>> from his
injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the country >>>>>>>>> from
this but only one political party will have the balls to talk >>>>>>>>> about it.
Cowardice, ignorance, and no balls, that sums up the Republican >>>>>>>>> side of
the equation.
Another demographic you're curiously unconcerned about Hutt... >>>>>>>>
In the last week alone, illegal aliens have been arrested for: >>>>>>>>
--Murdering a college student in Georgia
--Murdering a 2-year-old boy in Maryland
--Raping a minor in Virginia
--Raping a minor at knifepoint in Louisiana
--Shooting three DC police officers
But that's all down to Joe Biden's border policies. No
Republicans to
blame so
Hutt doesn't care.
like for
any other demographic. Well, maybe not Rhodes scholars...
That bill will allow 3000-5000 illegals per day to continue to flow
unvetted into America. That's not a 'solution', that's merely
codifying the
chaos into law and it was rightly rejected.
Republicans don't want a border solution, they want an issue to
run on.
And after three years of an absolute Dem-induced free-for-all at
the border
where more illegals than the population of Wisconsin were allowed
to enter
unchecked and unvetted, Dems suddenly decide to pretend they want
to do
something about it so that issue isn't available for Republicans to
use
against them.
But even their 'solution' is no solution at all. Just more of the
same but
now the free-for-all would be legalized.
THIS WAS A REPUBLICAN SOLUTION, MORON.
Republicans themselves said this is the most far reaching bill, and
includes everything they've been asking for for 20 years.
And those Republicans are lying just as much as the Dems are if they're
saying this bill actually secured the border and stops the firehose of
illegal aliens.
The only clear lie here would be pretending that the bill was scuttled
for any reason other than Trump's yearning for a campaign issue.
Some of the MOST conservative Republicans crafted this bill. Then they voted against it when told to. Yes, by Trump.
Republicans won't pass ANYTHING because they don't have any other issues
to run on.
It's just THAT simple.
In article <usgbfr$1vp6f$4@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 3/6/24 12:45 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <usa2h0$g16c$5@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 3/4/24 1:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 4, 2024 at 5:56:21 AM PST, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
Republicans themselves said this is the most far reaching bill, and >>>>>> includes everything they've been asking for for 20 years.
The week Biden took office, he issued 94 executive orders to open the >>>>> border and stand down enforcement of immigration law.
Until Biden rescinds those EOs, any claims he makes that he wants to >>>>> address illegal immigration are nothing but lies.
So answer his question. What was in the bill that was bad?
I already did an in-depth analysis of this abomination several weeks
ago, which you completely ignored and only responded to by insulting
Trump as per usual. Why should I do it all again just for you to ignore
it again?
Oh, hell, hope springs eternal and it's easy to copy and paste so here
goes:
The Republicans got most of what they wanted and that still wasn't
good enough
Of course it wasn't good enough. And I don't know who you're referring
to specifically by 'the Republicans' but anyone who isn't a RINO got
next to nothing from this bill with regard to border security. And
that's being generous.
Even as hundreds of thousands of illegals stream across the border every >>> month, including thousands of gang members recently kicked out of prison >>> in places like El Salvador, looking for a friendlier place to commit
their crimes, this 'border deal' would have done absolutely nothing to
secure the border.
First, it's important to emphasize that no 'border deal' is necessary in >>> the first place. Under existing law, including the Immigration and
Nationality Act of 1952, the president of the United States has the
authority to turn every single illegal alien away at the border if he
determines it's necessary to safeguard the country, to include refugees. >>> There is no requirement that we entertain millions of fraudulent asylum
claims-- or even legitimate asylum claims, as rare as those may be.
There is no legal requirement that we allow a single non-citizen into
this country. Period.
All that's necessary to secure the border is for the president of the
United States to start doing his damn job and enforcing the law, to
start using the power that he *already* legitimately and
constitutionally has. It doesn't need to be complicated. We just need to >>> start enforcing existing laws as they stand.
But if the White House actually adopted this simple and straightforward
solution, two things would happen:
(1) The Democrat Party would lose out on millions of future loyal voters >>> once the next stage of their plan is implemented: the 'path to
citizenship' for all the illegals we let in and who now will be
described as leading an 'unfair' twilight existence in our society which >>> can only be solved by making them citizens. Democrats' longstanding
plans for demographic replacement at the polls would be stymied.
(2) Congress would miss out on a chance to launder hundreds of millions
of dollars and Congress never misses out on an opportunity like that.
So here we are.
The bill proposed in the Senate would allocate another $60 billion
dollars in military aid to Ukraine and $14 billion to Israel. (We
already give Israel billions every year-- what have they been doing with >>> that? Where has that money gone that we need to dump $14 billion more on >>> their doorstep?) That's a grand total of $74 billion going to secure the >>> borders of other countries. By comparison, the bill only allocates $20
billion for U.S. border security.
So to restate for the slow kids in the back of the room: Our leaders are >>> proposing to spend roughly 400% more on securing the borders of two
other foreign countries than they are on securing the border of our own
country.
And it gets worse. Because even the money that's supposedly going for
our border security will actually in practice only facilitate the entry
of millions of more illegal aliens into the U.S. Specifically, the bill
allocates $2.3 billion for something called "refugee and entry
assistance activities" by giving "grants or contracts to qualified
organizations and non-profit entities to provide culturally and
linguistically appropriate services, including housing, medical, and
legal assistance and ease management assistance". (Ease management
assistance? WTF? Why am I paying for that?) So that's more than two
billion dollars to the left-wing 'non-profit' organizations that exist
principally to find ways to sneak as many illegals into this country as
possible.
By doing so, this bill actually creates more incentives for illegals to
come here in the first place.
One of the highlights of the bill is that it requires the Executive
Branch to close the border on an emergency basis if the number of
illegal entries exceeds 5000 in one week or 8500 in one day.
Except the bill also gives Joe Biden the authority to waive this
emergency requirement at any time at his discretion. So of course it
will never be enforced. He and DHS Secretary Mayorkas could effectively
just ignore this entire section of the law if it were passed.
The bill also doesn't count unaccompanied minors from countries other
than Mexico and Canada toward the totals necessary for border closings.
In other words, a significant percentage of illegals from Haiti, Cuba,
Honduras, Pakistan, China, etc. simply don't count. We could have 20,000 >>> of those show up in one day and it wouldn't count.
And on top of that, the bill doesn't *actually* close the border, even
if this fraudulent 5000-illegal threshold is reached. Per one of the
bill's co-authors, Senator Chris Murphy: "The bill contains a
requirement that the president funnel asylum claims to the land ports of >>> entry when more than 5000 people cross in a day. The border never closes >>> but claims must be processed at the ports."
So basically even if these arbitrary numbers are reached, the border
never closes. The illegals are just re-directed to processing centers
where they are then let into the country. It's a complete scam by
design. And a scam that's designed to last for a long time, given the
bill's 3-year sunset provision. The idea being that if Trump does get
re-elected, he'd be bound by the terms of this deal and couldn't do
crazy things like ACTUALLY shut down the border and stop this
never-ending firehose of illegals.
In one key respect, this bill would actually *lessen* the
already-minimal standards for allowing illegals into the country. Right
now, people applying for asylum need to show "a significant possibility
that they can establish a credible fear of persecution on the basis of
race, national origin, political beliefs, etc." Not a high standard. It
doesn't require them to provide any actual evidence of their claims.
Just make a claim, which they've been coached to say and which they've
rehearsed, and then get into the country. But this border bill would
lower that standard even further, if that's possible, from a
"significant" possibility of persecution to merely a "reasonable"
possibility of persecution. And reasonable is just another way of saying >>> 'plausible'. In other words, it's a bar that anyone from anywhere can
clear. There's no way that anyone claiming asylum will ever get turned
away if that's the standard.
The bill is an abomination that makes the border *less* secure than it
already is, which is a remarkable feat that few, if any, people imagined >>> was even possible.
Thank god the House Republicans said the bill was dead on arrival. But
it doesn't begin to explain why Senate Republicans thought there was
anything here that could possibly be considered good for America.
It's as if the Senate is made up of politicians who despise their own
citizens and whose top priority is the safety of foreigners in other
countries thousands of miles from their own shores. And they know it.
When you confront them on why they've utterly failed at the border, they >>> don't even try and justify their behavior. They just call you a racist
for even asking the question. There's no political calculation that
would explain their support for this nonsense. The American people,
Democrats and Republicans alike are overwhelmingly upset about what's
going on at the border. There's no support for it.
Polls clearly show that no one's buying the idea that we need a nearly
$100 billion giveaway to Ukraine and Israel in order to do something as
basic as enforcing the law here in America.
Nobody seriously thinks that it's appropriate to pay foreign countries
vast sums of money to secure their borders while we allocate a fraction
of that money to open up our own borders even more. Most Americans want
our leaders to prioritize our country before other countries. It is not
an unreasonable thing for us to want.
Who wouldn't have given ANY amount of money to defeat Hitler in WWII if
it meant no American lives would have been lost?
What sort of a moron thinks paying Hitler would have been necessary
before we could enforce our own laws here in America?
Oh, and notice how Effa, after demanding I tell him *again* what was in
the bipartisan bill that was bad for America doesn't bother responding
to any of it. Again.
Two weeks from now he'll be back to demanding I tell him what's bad
about the 'bipartisan border bill' again.
On 3/5/24 5:33 AM, trotsky wrote:
On 3/4/24 3:30 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:
On Mar 1, 2024 at 10:08:34 PM PST, atropos@mac.com wrote:
On Mar 1, 2024 at 1:22:56 PM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> wrote: >>>>> On 2/28/24 1:24 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
But... the only reason this rape happened was because the boy
put on a
dress and all the female students were told that boys in dresses >>>>>> are now
allowed to be in your restrooms, changing rooms, locker rooms, and >>>>>> showers, your rights to privacy be damned.
And yet a representative sampling of one still isn't statistically
significant.
Weird you seemed to have forgotten about that when you posted about Nex >>>> Benedict, Hutt.
You post about one anecdotal incident and it's supposed to have
far-reaching
implications. I post one in response and you vomit out your usual "a
representative sampling of one still isn't statistically
significant" tripe.
Double standards. If you didn't have them, you'd have no standards
at all.
And "trotsky" has suddenly broken his compulsion to post a followup to
everything you post to RAT-U....
Fucked in the head as ever Pubie. Is that why I have the most posts
in this thread?
Fuck, how is he still alive?
On 3/8/24 8:40 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <usgbfr$1vp6f$4@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 3/6/24 12:45 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <usa2h0$g16c$5@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 3/4/24 1:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 4, 2024 at 5:56:21 AM PST, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>
Republicans themselves said this is the most far reaching bill, and >>>>>>> includes everything they've been asking for for 20 years.
The week Biden took office, he issued 94 executive orders to open the >>>>>> border and stand down enforcement of immigration law.
Until Biden rescinds those EOs, any claims he makes that he wants to >>>>>> address illegal immigration are nothing but lies.
So answer his question. What was in the bill that was bad?
I already did an in-depth analysis of this abomination several weeks >>>> ago, which you completely ignored and only responded to by insulting >>>> Trump as per usual. Why should I do it all again just for you to ignore >>>> it again?
Oh, hell, hope springs eternal and it's easy to copy and paste so here >>>> goes:
The Republicans got most of what they wanted and that still wasn't >>>>> good enough
Of course it wasn't good enough. And I don't know who you're referring >>>> to specifically by 'the Republicans' but anyone who isn't a RINO got >>>> next to nothing from this bill with regard to border security. And
that's being generous.
Even as hundreds of thousands of illegals stream across the border
every
month, including thousands of gang members recently kicked out of
prison
in places like El Salvador, looking for a friendlier place to commit >>>> their crimes, this 'border deal' would have done absolutely nothing to >>>> secure the border.
First, it's important to emphasize that no 'border deal' is
necessary in
the first place. Under existing law, including the Immigration and
Nationality Act of 1952, the president of the United States has the
authority to turn every single illegal alien away at the border if he >>>> determines it's necessary to safeguard the country, to include
refugees.
There is no requirement that we entertain millions of fraudulent asylum >>>> claims-- or even legitimate asylum claims, as rare as those may be.
There is no legal requirement that we allow a single non-citizen into >>>> this country. Period.
All that's necessary to secure the border is for the president of the >>>> United States to start doing his damn job and enforcing the law, to
start using the power that he *already* legitimately and
constitutionally has. It doesn't need to be complicated. We just
need to
start enforcing existing laws as they stand.
But if the White House actually adopted this simple and straightforward >>>> solution, two things would happen:
(1) The Democrat Party would lose out on millions of future loyal
voters
once the next stage of their plan is implemented: the 'path to
citizenship' for all the illegals we let in and who now will be
described as leading an 'unfair' twilight existence in our society
which
can only be solved by making them citizens. Democrats' longstanding
plans for demographic replacement at the polls would be stymied.
(2) Congress would miss out on a chance to launder hundreds of millions >>>> of dollars and Congress never misses out on an opportunity like that. >>>>
So here we are.
The bill proposed in the Senate would allocate another $60 billion
dollars in military aid to Ukraine and $14 billion to Israel. (We
already give Israel billions every year-- what have they been doing
with
that? Where has that money gone that we need to dump $14 billion
more on
their doorstep?) That's a grand total of $74 billion going to secure >>>> the
borders of other countries. By comparison, the bill only allocates $20 >>>> billion for U.S. border security.
So to restate for the slow kids in the back of the room: Our leaders >>>> are
proposing to spend roughly 400% more on securing the borders of two
other foreign countries than they are on securing the border of our own >>>> country.
And it gets worse. Because even the money that's supposedly going for >>>> our border security will actually in practice only facilitate the entry >>>> of millions of more illegal aliens into the U.S. Specifically, the bill >>>> allocates $2.3 billion for something called "refugee and entry
assistance activities" by giving "grants or contracts to qualified
organizations and non-profit entities to provide culturally and
linguistically appropriate services, including housing, medical, and >>>> legal assistance and ease management assistance". (Ease management
assistance? WTF? Why am I paying for that?) So that's more than two
billion dollars to the left-wing 'non-profit' organizations that exist >>>> principally to find ways to sneak as many illegals into this country as >>>> possible.
By doing so, this bill actually creates more incentives for illegals to >>>> come here in the first place.
One of the highlights of the bill is that it requires the Executive
Branch to close the border on an emergency basis if the number of
illegal entries exceeds 5000 in one week or 8500 in one day.
Except the bill also gives Joe Biden the authority to waive this
emergency requirement at any time at his discretion. So of course it >>>> will never be enforced. He and DHS Secretary Mayorkas could effectively >>>> just ignore this entire section of the law if it were passed.
The bill also doesn't count unaccompanied minors from countries other >>>> than Mexico and Canada toward the totals necessary for border closings. >>>> In other words, a significant percentage of illegals from Haiti, Cuba, >>>> Honduras, Pakistan, China, etc. simply don't count. We could have
20,000
of those show up in one day and it wouldn't count.
And on top of that, the bill doesn't *actually* close the border, even >>>> if this fraudulent 5000-illegal threshold is reached. Per one of the >>>> bill's co-authors, Senator Chris Murphy: "The bill contains a
requirement that the president funnel asylum claims to the land
ports of
entry when more than 5000 people cross in a day. The border never
closes
but claims must be processed at the ports."
So basically even if these arbitrary numbers are reached, the border >>>> never closes. The illegals are just re-directed to processing centers >>>> where they are then let into the country. It's a complete scam by
design. And a scam that's designed to last for a long time, given the >>>> bill's 3-year sunset provision. The idea being that if Trump does get >>>> re-elected, he'd be bound by the terms of this deal and couldn't do
crazy things like ACTUALLY shut down the border and stop this
never-ending firehose of illegals.
In one key respect, this bill would actually *lessen* the
already-minimal standards for allowing illegals into the country. Right >>>> now, people applying for asylum need to show "a significant possibility >>>> that they can establish a credible fear of persecution on the basis of >>>> race, national origin, political beliefs, etc." Not a high standard. It >>>> doesn't require them to provide any actual evidence of their claims. >>>> Just make a claim, which they've been coached to say and which they've >>>> rehearsed, and then get into the country. But this border bill would >>>> lower that standard even further, if that's possible, from a
"significant" possibility of persecution to merely a "reasonable"
possibility of persecution. And reasonable is just another way of
saying
'plausible'. In other words, it's a bar that anyone from anywhere can >>>> clear. There's no way that anyone claiming asylum will ever get turned >>>> away if that's the standard.
The bill is an abomination that makes the border *less* secure than it >>>> already is, which is a remarkable feat that few, if any, people
imagined
was even possible.
Thank god the House Republicans said the bill was dead on arrival. But >>>> it doesn't begin to explain why Senate Republicans thought there was >>>> anything here that could possibly be considered good for America.
It's as if the Senate is made up of politicians who despise their own >>>> citizens and whose top priority is the safety of foreigners in other >>>> countries thousands of miles from their own shores. And they know it. >>>>
When you confront them on why they've utterly failed at the border,
they
don't even try and justify their behavior. They just call you a racist >>>> for even asking the question. There's no political calculation that
would explain their support for this nonsense. The American people,
Democrats and Republicans alike are overwhelmingly upset about what's >>>> going on at the border. There's no support for it.
Polls clearly show that no one's buying the idea that we need a nearly >>>> $100 billion giveaway to Ukraine and Israel in order to do something as >>>> basic as enforcing the law here in America.
Nobody seriously thinks that it's appropriate to pay foreign countries >>>> vast sums of money to secure their borders while we allocate a fraction >>>> of that money to open up our own borders even more. Most Americans want >>>> our leaders to prioritize our country before other countries. It is not >>>> an unreasonable thing for us to want.
Who wouldn't have given ANY amount of money to defeat Hitler in WWII if >>> it meant no American lives would have been lost?
What sort of a moron thinks paying Hitler would have been necessary
before we could enforce our own laws here in America?
Oh, and notice how Effa, after demanding I tell him *again* what was in
the bipartisan bill that was bad for America doesn't bother responding
to any of it. Again.
Two weeks from now he'll be back to demanding I tell him what's bad
about the 'bipartisan border bill' again.
They don't like their own bill because Donald Trump TOLD them not to
like it.
On 3/8/24 9:40 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <usgbfr$1vp6f$4@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 3/6/24 12:45 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <usa2h0$g16c$5@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 3/4/24 1:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 4, 2024 at 5:56:21 AM PST, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote: >>>
Republicans themselves said this is the most far reaching bill, and >>>>>> includes everything they've been asking for for 20 years.
The week Biden took office, he issued 94 executive orders to open the >>>>> border and stand down enforcement of immigration law.
Until Biden rescinds those EOs, any claims he makes that he wants to >>>>> address illegal immigration are nothing but lies.
So answer his question. What was in the bill that was bad?
I already did an in-depth analysis of this abomination several weeks
ago, which you completely ignored and only responded to by insulting
Trump as per usual. Why should I do it all again just for you to ignore >>> it again?
Oh, hell, hope springs eternal and it's easy to copy and paste so here >>> goes:
The Republicans got most of what they wanted and that still wasn't
good enough
Of course it wasn't good enough. And I don't know who you're referring >>> to specifically by 'the Republicans' but anyone who isn't a RINO got
next to nothing from this bill with regard to border security. And
that's being generous.
Even as hundreds of thousands of illegals stream across the border every >>> month, including thousands of gang members recently kicked out of prison >>> in places like El Salvador, looking for a friendlier place to commit
their crimes, this 'border deal' would have done absolutely nothing to >>> secure the border.
First, it's important to emphasize that no 'border deal' is necessary in >>> the first place. Under existing law, including the Immigration and
Nationality Act of 1952, the president of the United States has the
authority to turn every single illegal alien away at the border if he
determines it's necessary to safeguard the country, to include refugees. >>> There is no requirement that we entertain millions of fraudulent asylum >>> claims-- or even legitimate asylum claims, as rare as those may be.
There is no legal requirement that we allow a single non-citizen into
this country. Period.
All that's necessary to secure the border is for the president of the
United States to start doing his damn job and enforcing the law, to
start using the power that he *already* legitimately and
constitutionally has. It doesn't need to be complicated. We just need to >>> start enforcing existing laws as they stand.
But if the White House actually adopted this simple and straightforward >>> solution, two things would happen:
(1) The Democrat Party would lose out on millions of future loyal voters >>> once the next stage of their plan is implemented: the 'path to
citizenship' for all the illegals we let in and who now will be
described as leading an 'unfair' twilight existence in our society which >>> can only be solved by making them citizens. Democrats' longstanding
plans for demographic replacement at the polls would be stymied.
(2) Congress would miss out on a chance to launder hundreds of millions >>> of dollars and Congress never misses out on an opportunity like that.
So here we are.
The bill proposed in the Senate would allocate another $60 billion
dollars in military aid to Ukraine and $14 billion to Israel. (We
already give Israel billions every year-- what have they been doing with >>> that? Where has that money gone that we need to dump $14 billion more on >>> their doorstep?) That's a grand total of $74 billion going to secure the >>> borders of other countries. By comparison, the bill only allocates $20 >>> billion for U.S. border security.
So to restate for the slow kids in the back of the room: Our leaders are >>> proposing to spend roughly 400% more on securing the borders of two
other foreign countries than they are on securing the border of our own >>> country.
And it gets worse. Because even the money that's supposedly going for
our border security will actually in practice only facilitate the entry >>> of millions of more illegal aliens into the U.S. Specifically, the bill >>> allocates $2.3 billion for something called "refugee and entry
assistance activities" by giving "grants or contracts to qualified
organizations and non-profit entities to provide culturally and
linguistically appropriate services, including housing, medical, and
legal assistance and ease management assistance". (Ease management
assistance? WTF? Why am I paying for that?) So that's more than two
billion dollars to the left-wing 'non-profit' organizations that exist >>> principally to find ways to sneak as many illegals into this country as >>> possible.
By doing so, this bill actually creates more incentives for illegals to >>> come here in the first place.
One of the highlights of the bill is that it requires the Executive
Branch to close the border on an emergency basis if the number of
illegal entries exceeds 5000 in one week or 8500 in one day.
Except the bill also gives Joe Biden the authority to waive this
emergency requirement at any time at his discretion. So of course it
will never be enforced. He and DHS Secretary Mayorkas could effectively >>> just ignore this entire section of the law if it were passed.
The bill also doesn't count unaccompanied minors from countries other
than Mexico and Canada toward the totals necessary for border closings. >>> In other words, a significant percentage of illegals from Haiti, Cuba, >>> Honduras, Pakistan, China, etc. simply don't count. We could have 20,000 >>> of those show up in one day and it wouldn't count.
And on top of that, the bill doesn't *actually* close the border, even >>> if this fraudulent 5000-illegal threshold is reached. Per one of the
bill's co-authors, Senator Chris Murphy: "The bill contains a
requirement that the president funnel asylum claims to the land ports of >>> entry when more than 5000 people cross in a day. The border never closes >>> but claims must be processed at the ports."
So basically even if these arbitrary numbers are reached, the border
never closes. The illegals are just re-directed to processing centers
where they are then let into the country. It's a complete scam by
design. And a scam that's designed to last for a long time, given the
bill's 3-year sunset provision. The idea being that if Trump does get
re-elected, he'd be bound by the terms of this deal and couldn't do
crazy things like ACTUALLY shut down the border and stop this
never-ending firehose of illegals.
In one key respect, this bill would actually *lessen* the
already-minimal standards for allowing illegals into the country. Right >>> now, people applying for asylum need to show "a significant possibility >>> that they can establish a credible fear of persecution on the basis of >>> race, national origin, political beliefs, etc." Not a high standard. It >>> doesn't require them to provide any actual evidence of their claims.
Just make a claim, which they've been coached to say and which they've >>> rehearsed, and then get into the country. But this border bill would
lower that standard even further, if that's possible, from a
"significant" possibility of persecution to merely a "reasonable"
possibility of persecution. And reasonable is just another way of saying >>> 'plausible'. In other words, it's a bar that anyone from anywhere can
clear. There's no way that anyone claiming asylum will ever get turned >>> away if that's the standard.
The bill is an abomination that makes the border *less* secure than it >>> already is, which is a remarkable feat that few, if any, people imagined >>> was even possible.
Thank god the House Republicans said the bill was dead on arrival. But >>> it doesn't begin to explain why Senate Republicans thought there was
anything here that could possibly be considered good for America.
It's as if the Senate is made up of politicians who despise their own
citizens and whose top priority is the safety of foreigners in other
countries thousands of miles from their own shores. And they know it.
When you confront them on why they've utterly failed at the border, they >>> don't even try and justify their behavior. They just call you a racist >>> for even asking the question. There's no political calculation that
would explain their support for this nonsense. The American people,
Democrats and Republicans alike are overwhelmingly upset about what's
going on at the border. There's no support for it.
Polls clearly show that no one's buying the idea that we need a nearly >>> $100 billion giveaway to Ukraine and Israel in order to do something as >>> basic as enforcing the law here in America.
Nobody seriously thinks that it's appropriate to pay foreign countries >>> vast sums of money to secure their borders while we allocate a fraction >>> of that money to open up our own borders even more. Most Americans want >>> our leaders to prioritize our country before other countries. It is not >>> an unreasonable thing for us to want.
Who wouldn't have given ANY amount of money to defeat Hitler in WWII if
it meant no American lives would have been lost?
What sort of a moron thinks paying Hitler would have been necessary
before we could enforce our own laws here in America?
Oh, and notice how Effa, after demanding I tell him *again* what was in
the bipartisan bill that was bad for America doesn't bother responding
to any of it. Again.
Two weeks from now he'll be back to demanding I tell him what's bad
about the 'bipartisan border bill' again.
Because your excuses are BULLSHIT.
YOU fuckers crafted the fucking bill. If it blows, it blows because
YOU fuckers made it blow.
You asked for what you wanted. Dems said yes.
In article <uskdb8$300lk$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 3/8/24 8:40 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <usgbfr$1vp6f$4@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 3/6/24 12:45 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <usa2h0$g16c$5@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote:
On 3/4/24 1:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 4, 2024 at 5:56:21 AM PST, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>
Republicans themselves said this is the most far reaching bill, and >>>>>>>>> includes everything they've been asking for for 20 years.
The week Biden took office, he issued 94 executive orders to open the >>>>>>>> border and stand down enforcement of immigration law.
Until Biden rescinds those EOs, any claims he makes that he wants to >>>>>>>> address illegal immigration are nothing but lies.
So answer his question. What was in the bill that was bad?
I already did an in-depth analysis of this abomination several weeks >>>>>> ago, which you completely ignored and only responded to by insulting >>>>>> Trump as per usual. Why should I do it all again just for you to ignore >>>>>> it again?
Oh, hell, hope springs eternal and it's easy to copy and paste so here >>>>>> goes:
The Republicans got most of what they wanted and that still wasn't >>>>>>> good enough
Of course it wasn't good enough. And I don't know who you're referring >>>>>> to specifically by 'the Republicans' but anyone who isn't a RINO got >>>>>> next to nothing from this bill with regard to border security. And >>>>>> that's being generous.
Even as hundreds of thousands of illegals stream across the border >>>>>> every
month, including thousands of gang members recently kicked out of
prison
in places like El Salvador, looking for a friendlier place to commit >>>>>> their crimes, this 'border deal' would have done absolutely nothing to >>>>>> secure the border.
First, it's important to emphasize that no 'border deal' is
necessary in
the first place. Under existing law, including the Immigration and >>>>>> Nationality Act of 1952, the president of the United States has the >>>>>> authority to turn every single illegal alien away at the border if he >>>>>> determines it's necessary to safeguard the country, to include
refugees.
There is no requirement that we entertain millions of fraudulent asylum >>>>>> claims-- or even legitimate asylum claims, as rare as those may be. >>>>>>
There is no legal requirement that we allow a single non-citizen into >>>>>> this country. Period.
All that's necessary to secure the border is for the president of the >>>>>> United States to start doing his damn job and enforcing the law, to >>>>>> start using the power that he *already* legitimately and
constitutionally has. It doesn't need to be complicated. We just
need to
start enforcing existing laws as they stand.
But if the White House actually adopted this simple and straightforward >>>>>> solution, two things would happen:
(1) The Democrat Party would lose out on millions of future loyal
voters
once the next stage of their plan is implemented: the 'path to
citizenship' for all the illegals we let in and who now will be
described as leading an 'unfair' twilight existence in our society >>>>>> which
can only be solved by making them citizens. Democrats' longstanding >>>>>> plans for demographic replacement at the polls would be stymied.
(2) Congress would miss out on a chance to launder hundreds of millions >>>>>> of dollars and Congress never misses out on an opportunity like that. >>>>>>
So here we are.
The bill proposed in the Senate would allocate another $60 billion >>>>>> dollars in military aid to Ukraine and $14 billion to Israel. (We
already give Israel billions every year-- what have they been doing >>>>>> with
that? Where has that money gone that we need to dump $14 billion
more on
their doorstep?) That's a grand total of $74 billion going to secure >>>>>> the
borders of other countries. By comparison, the bill only allocates $20 >>>>>> billion for U.S. border security.
So to restate for the slow kids in the back of the room: Our leaders >>>>>> are
proposing to spend roughly 400% more on securing the borders of two >>>>>> other foreign countries than they are on securing the border of our own >>>>>> country.
And it gets worse. Because even the money that's supposedly going for >>>>>> our border security will actually in practice only facilitate the entry >>>>>> of millions of more illegal aliens into the U.S. Specifically, the bill >>>>>> allocates $2.3 billion for something called "refugee and entry
assistance activities" by giving "grants or contracts to qualified >>>>>> organizations and non-profit entities to provide culturally and
linguistically appropriate services, including housing, medical, and >>>>>> legal assistance and ease management assistance". (Ease management >>>>>> assistance? WTF? Why am I paying for that?) So that's more than two >>>>>> billion dollars to the left-wing 'non-profit' organizations that exist >>>>>> principally to find ways to sneak as many illegals into this country as >>>>>> possible.
By doing so, this bill actually creates more incentives for illegals to >>>>>> come here in the first place.
One of the highlights of the bill is that it requires the Executive >>>>>> Branch to close the border on an emergency basis if the number of
illegal entries exceeds 5000 in one week or 8500 in one day.
Except the bill also gives Joe Biden the authority to waive this
emergency requirement at any time at his discretion. So of course it >>>>>> will never be enforced. He and DHS Secretary Mayorkas could effectively >>>>>> just ignore this entire section of the law if it were passed.
The bill also doesn't count unaccompanied minors from countries other >>>>>> than Mexico and Canada toward the totals necessary for border closings. >>>>>> In other words, a significant percentage of illegals from Haiti, Cuba, >>>>>> Honduras, Pakistan, China, etc. simply don't count. We could have
20,000
of those show up in one day and it wouldn't count.
And on top of that, the bill doesn't *actually* close the border, even >>>>>> if this fraudulent 5000-illegal threshold is reached. Per one of the >>>>>> bill's co-authors, Senator Chris Murphy: "The bill contains a
requirement that the president funnel asylum claims to the land
ports of
entry when more than 5000 people cross in a day. The border never
closes
but claims must be processed at the ports."
So basically even if these arbitrary numbers are reached, the border >>>>>> never closes. The illegals are just re-directed to processing centers >>>>>> where they are then let into the country. It's a complete scam by
design. And a scam that's designed to last for a long time, given the >>>>>> bill's 3-year sunset provision. The idea being that if Trump does get >>>>>> re-elected, he'd be bound by the terms of this deal and couldn't do >>>>>> crazy things like ACTUALLY shut down the border and stop this
never-ending firehose of illegals.
In one key respect, this bill would actually *lessen* the
already-minimal standards for allowing illegals into the country. Right >>>>>> now, people applying for asylum need to show "a significant possibility >>>>>> that they can establish a credible fear of persecution on the basis of >>>>>> race, national origin, political beliefs, etc." Not a high standard. It >>>>>> doesn't require them to provide any actual evidence of their claims. >>>>>> Just make a claim, which they've been coached to say and which they've >>>>>> rehearsed, and then get into the country. But this border bill would >>>>>> lower that standard even further, if that's possible, from a
"significant" possibility of persecution to merely a "reasonable"
possibility of persecution. And reasonable is just another way of
saying
'plausible'. In other words, it's a bar that anyone from anywhere can >>>>>> clear. There's no way that anyone claiming asylum will ever get turned >>>>>> away if that's the standard.
The bill is an abomination that makes the border *less* secure than it >>>>>> already is, which is a remarkable feat that few, if any, people
imagined
was even possible.
Thank god the House Republicans said the bill was dead on arrival. But >>>>>> it doesn't begin to explain why Senate Republicans thought there was >>>>>> anything here that could possibly be considered good for America.
It's as if the Senate is made up of politicians who despise their own >>>>>> citizens and whose top priority is the safety of foreigners in other >>>>>> countries thousands of miles from their own shores. And they know it. >>>>>>
When you confront them on why they've utterly failed at the border, >>>>>> they
don't even try and justify their behavior. They just call you a racist >>>>>> for even asking the question. There's no political calculation that >>>>>> would explain their support for this nonsense. The American people, >>>>>> Democrats and Republicans alike are overwhelmingly upset about what's >>>>>> going on at the border. There's no support for it.
Polls clearly show that no one's buying the idea that we need a nearly >>>>>> $100 billion giveaway to Ukraine and Israel in order to do something as >>>>>> basic as enforcing the law here in America.
Nobody seriously thinks that it's appropriate to pay foreign countries >>>>>> vast sums of money to secure their borders while we allocate a fraction >>>>>> of that money to open up our own borders even more. Most Americans want >>>>>> our leaders to prioritize our country before other countries. It is not >>>>>> an unreasonable thing for us to want.
Who wouldn't have given ANY amount of money to defeat Hitler in WWII if >>>>> it meant no American lives would have been lost?
What sort of a moron thinks paying Hitler would have been necessary
before we could enforce our own laws here in America?
Oh, and notice how Effa, after demanding I tell him *again* what was in >>>> the bipartisan bill that was bad for America doesn't bother responding >>>> to any of it. Again.
Two weeks from now he'll be back to demanding I tell him what's bad
about the 'bipartisan border bill' again.
They don't like their own bill because Donald Trump TOLD them not to
like it.
Sure. If it wasn't for Trump giving me orders, I'd *love* the idea of
8000 unvetted illegals per day streaming into the country.
In article <uskd6v$300lk$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 3/8/24 9:40 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <usgbfr$1vp6f$4@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>Because your excuses are BULLSHIT.
wrote:
On 3/6/24 12:45 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <usa2h0$g16c$5@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 3/4/24 1:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 4, 2024 at 5:56:21 AM PST, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>
Republicans themselves said this is the most far reaching bill, and >>>>>>>> includes everything they've been asking for for 20 years.
The week Biden took office, he issued 94 executive orders to open the >>>>>>> border and stand down enforcement of immigration law.
Until Biden rescinds those EOs, any claims he makes that he wants to >>>>>>> address illegal immigration are nothing but lies.
So answer his question. What was in the bill that was bad?
I already did an in-depth analysis of this abomination several weeks >>>>> ago, which you completely ignored and only responded to by insulting >>>>> Trump as per usual. Why should I do it all again just for you to ignore >>>>> it again?
Oh, hell, hope springs eternal and it's easy to copy and paste so here >>>>> goes:
The Republicans got most of what they wanted and that still wasn't >>>>>> good enough
Of course it wasn't good enough. And I don't know who you're referring >>>>> to specifically by 'the Republicans' but anyone who isn't a RINO got >>>>> next to nothing from this bill with regard to border security. And
that's being generous.
Even as hundreds of thousands of illegals stream across the border every >>>>> month, including thousands of gang members recently kicked out of prison >>>>> in places like El Salvador, looking for a friendlier place to commit >>>>> their crimes, this 'border deal' would have done absolutely nothing to >>>>> secure the border.
First, it's important to emphasize that no 'border deal' is necessary in >>>>> the first place. Under existing law, including the Immigration and
Nationality Act of 1952, the president of the United States has the
authority to turn every single illegal alien away at the border if he >>>>> determines it's necessary to safeguard the country, to include refugees. >>>>> There is no requirement that we entertain millions of fraudulent asylum >>>>> claims-- or even legitimate asylum claims, as rare as those may be.
There is no legal requirement that we allow a single non-citizen into >>>>> this country. Period.
All that's necessary to secure the border is for the president of the >>>>> United States to start doing his damn job and enforcing the law, to
start using the power that he *already* legitimately and
constitutionally has. It doesn't need to be complicated. We just need to >>>>> start enforcing existing laws as they stand.
But if the White House actually adopted this simple and straightforward >>>>> solution, two things would happen:
(1) The Democrat Party would lose out on millions of future loyal voters >>>>> once the next stage of their plan is implemented: the 'path to
citizenship' for all the illegals we let in and who now will be
described as leading an 'unfair' twilight existence in our society which >>>>> can only be solved by making them citizens. Democrats' longstanding
plans for demographic replacement at the polls would be stymied.
(2) Congress would miss out on a chance to launder hundreds of millions >>>>> of dollars and Congress never misses out on an opportunity like that. >>>>>
So here we are.
The bill proposed in the Senate would allocate another $60 billion
dollars in military aid to Ukraine and $14 billion to Israel. (We
already give Israel billions every year-- what have they been doing with >>>>> that? Where has that money gone that we need to dump $14 billion more on >>>>> their doorstep?) That's a grand total of $74 billion going to secure the >>>>> borders of other countries. By comparison, the bill only allocates $20 >>>>> billion for U.S. border security.
So to restate for the slow kids in the back of the room: Our leaders are >>>>> proposing to spend roughly 400% more on securing the borders of two
other foreign countries than they are on securing the border of our own >>>>> country.
And it gets worse. Because even the money that's supposedly going for >>>>> our border security will actually in practice only facilitate the entry >>>>> of millions of more illegal aliens into the U.S. Specifically, the bill >>>>> allocates $2.3 billion for something called "refugee and entry
assistance activities" by giving "grants or contracts to qualified
organizations and non-profit entities to provide culturally and
linguistically appropriate services, including housing, medical, and >>>>> legal assistance and ease management assistance". (Ease management
assistance? WTF? Why am I paying for that?) So that's more than two
billion dollars to the left-wing 'non-profit' organizations that exist >>>>> principally to find ways to sneak as many illegals into this country as >>>>> possible.
By doing so, this bill actually creates more incentives for illegals to >>>>> come here in the first place.
One of the highlights of the bill is that it requires the Executive
Branch to close the border on an emergency basis if the number of
illegal entries exceeds 5000 in one week or 8500 in one day.
Except the bill also gives Joe Biden the authority to waive this
emergency requirement at any time at his discretion. So of course it >>>>> will never be enforced. He and DHS Secretary Mayorkas could effectively >>>>> just ignore this entire section of the law if it were passed.
The bill also doesn't count unaccompanied minors from countries other >>>>> than Mexico and Canada toward the totals necessary for border closings. >>>>> In other words, a significant percentage of illegals from Haiti, Cuba, >>>>> Honduras, Pakistan, China, etc. simply don't count. We could have 20,000 >>>>> of those show up in one day and it wouldn't count.
And on top of that, the bill doesn't *actually* close the border, even >>>>> if this fraudulent 5000-illegal threshold is reached. Per one of the >>>>> bill's co-authors, Senator Chris Murphy: "The bill contains a
requirement that the president funnel asylum claims to the land ports of >>>>> entry when more than 5000 people cross in a day. The border never closes >>>>> but claims must be processed at the ports."
So basically even if these arbitrary numbers are reached, the border >>>>> never closes. The illegals are just re-directed to processing centers >>>>> where they are then let into the country. It's a complete scam by
design. And a scam that's designed to last for a long time, given the >>>>> bill's 3-year sunset provision. The idea being that if Trump does get >>>>> re-elected, he'd be bound by the terms of this deal and couldn't do
crazy things like ACTUALLY shut down the border and stop this
never-ending firehose of illegals.
In one key respect, this bill would actually *lessen* the
already-minimal standards for allowing illegals into the country. Right >>>>> now, people applying for asylum need to show "a significant possibility >>>>> that they can establish a credible fear of persecution on the basis of >>>>> race, national origin, political beliefs, etc." Not a high standard. It >>>>> doesn't require them to provide any actual evidence of their claims. >>>>> Just make a claim, which they've been coached to say and which they've >>>>> rehearsed, and then get into the country. But this border bill would >>>>> lower that standard even further, if that's possible, from a
"significant" possibility of persecution to merely a "reasonable"
possibility of persecution. And reasonable is just another way of saying >>>>> 'plausible'. In other words, it's a bar that anyone from anywhere can >>>>> clear. There's no way that anyone claiming asylum will ever get turned >>>>> away if that's the standard.
The bill is an abomination that makes the border *less* secure than it >>>>> already is, which is a remarkable feat that few, if any, people imagined >>>>> was even possible.
Thank god the House Republicans said the bill was dead on arrival. But >>>>> it doesn't begin to explain why Senate Republicans thought there was >>>>> anything here that could possibly be considered good for America.
It's as if the Senate is made up of politicians who despise their own >>>>> citizens and whose top priority is the safety of foreigners in other >>>>> countries thousands of miles from their own shores. And they know it. >>>>>
When you confront them on why they've utterly failed at the border, they >>>>> don't even try and justify their behavior. They just call you a racist >>>>> for even asking the question. There's no political calculation that
would explain their support for this nonsense. The American people,
Democrats and Republicans alike are overwhelmingly upset about what's >>>>> going on at the border. There's no support for it.
Polls clearly show that no one's buying the idea that we need a nearly >>>>> $100 billion giveaway to Ukraine and Israel in order to do something as >>>>> basic as enforcing the law here in America.
Nobody seriously thinks that it's appropriate to pay foreign countries >>>>> vast sums of money to secure their borders while we allocate a fraction >>>>> of that money to open up our own borders even more. Most Americans want >>>>> our leaders to prioritize our country before other countries. It is not >>>>> an unreasonable thing for us to want.
Who wouldn't have given ANY amount of money to defeat Hitler in WWII if >>>> it meant no American lives would have been lost?
What sort of a moron thinks paying Hitler would have been necessary
before we could enforce our own laws here in America?
Oh, and notice how Effa, after demanding I tell him *again* what was in
the bipartisan bill that was bad for America doesn't bother responding
to any of it. Again.
Two weeks from now he'll be back to demanding I tell him what's bad
about the 'bipartisan border bill' again.
Nothing I wrote above is an excuse. It's a description of what's
actually in the bill. You won't address it because you know you can't
defend it.
YOU fuckers crafted the fucking bill. If it blows, it blows because
YOU fuckers made it blow.
Oh, I'm sorry. You seem to be under the impression I've been in
Washington DC lately writing legislation. *I* didn't do anything and
since I'm not a partisan simp like you, I can criticize politicians when
they do stupid shit even when they're on my 'side'.
I don't care who wrote the damn thing or who was bribed to say it's a
good thing when they know it's not. Legalize the flow of millions of
unvetted illegals per year into the country is objectively *not* a good
thing and this Orwellian shit where we pretend the border is secure
merely because we passed a bill to legalize the chaos is the height of absurdity.
You asked for what you wanted. Dems said yes.
No, they didn't or the border would be secure. The Dems sure as shit
didn't give me what *I* wanted.
On 3/10/24 3:01 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <uskd6v$300lk$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 3/8/24 9:40 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <usgbfr$1vp6f$4@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>Because your excuses are BULLSHIT.
wrote:
On 3/6/24 12:45 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <usa2h0$g16c$5@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote:
On 3/4/24 1:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 4, 2024 at 5:56:21 AM PST, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
Republicans themselves said this is the most far reaching bill, >>>>>>>>> and
includes everything they've been asking for for 20 years.
The week Biden took office, he issued 94 executive orders to
open the
border and stand down enforcement of immigration law.
Until Biden rescinds those EOs, any claims he makes that he
wants to
address illegal immigration are nothing but lies.
So answer his question. What was in the bill that was bad?
I already did an in-depth analysis of this abomination several weeks >>>>>> ago, which you completely ignored and only responded to by insulting >>>>>> Trump as per usual. Why should I do it all again just for you to
ignore
it again?
Oh, hell, hope springs eternal and it's easy to copy and paste so
here
goes:
The Republicans got most of what they wanted and that still wasn't >>>>>>> good enough
Of course it wasn't good enough. And I don't know who you're
referring
to specifically by 'the Republicans' but anyone who isn't a RINO got >>>>>> next to nothing from this bill with regard to border security. And >>>>>> that's being generous.
Even as hundreds of thousands of illegals stream across the border >>>>>> every
month, including thousands of gang members recently kicked out of
prison
in places like El Salvador, looking for a friendlier place to commit >>>>>> their crimes, this 'border deal' would have done absolutely
nothing to
secure the border.
First, it's important to emphasize that no 'border deal' is
necessary in
the first place. Under existing law, including the Immigration and >>>>>> Nationality Act of 1952, the president of the United States has the >>>>>> authority to turn every single illegal alien away at the border if he >>>>>> determines it's necessary to safeguard the country, to include
refugees.
There is no requirement that we entertain millions of fraudulent
asylum
claims-- or even legitimate asylum claims, as rare as those may be. >>>>>>
There is no legal requirement that we allow a single non-citizen into >>>>>> this country. Period.
All that's necessary to secure the border is for the president of the >>>>>> United States to start doing his damn job and enforcing the law, to >>>>>> start using the power that he *already* legitimately and
constitutionally has. It doesn't need to be complicated. We just
need to
start enforcing existing laws as they stand.
But if the White House actually adopted this simple and
straightforward
solution, two things would happen:
(1) The Democrat Party would lose out on millions of future loyal
voters
once the next stage of their plan is implemented: the 'path to
citizenship' for all the illegals we let in and who now will be
described as leading an 'unfair' twilight existence in our society >>>>>> which
can only be solved by making them citizens. Democrats' longstanding >>>>>> plans for demographic replacement at the polls would be stymied.
(2) Congress would miss out on a chance to launder hundreds of
millions
of dollars and Congress never misses out on an opportunity like that. >>>>>>
So here we are.
The bill proposed in the Senate would allocate another $60 billion >>>>>> dollars in military aid to Ukraine and $14 billion to Israel. (We
already give Israel billions every year-- what have they been
doing with
that? Where has that money gone that we need to dump $14 billion
more on
their doorstep?) That's a grand total of $74 billion going to
secure the
borders of other countries. By comparison, the bill only allocates >>>>>> $20
billion for U.S. border security.
So to restate for the slow kids in the back of the room: Our
leaders are
proposing to spend roughly 400% more on securing the borders of two >>>>>> other foreign countries than they are on securing the border of
our own
country.
And it gets worse. Because even the money that's supposedly going for >>>>>> our border security will actually in practice only facilitate the
entry
of millions of more illegal aliens into the U.S. Specifically, the >>>>>> bill
allocates $2.3 billion for something called "refugee and entry
assistance activities" by giving "grants or contracts to qualified >>>>>> organizations and non-profit entities to provide culturally and
linguistically appropriate services, including housing, medical, and >>>>>> legal assistance and ease management assistance". (Ease management >>>>>> assistance? WTF? Why am I paying for that?) So that's more than two >>>>>> billion dollars to the left-wing 'non-profit' organizations that
exist
principally to find ways to sneak as many illegals into this
country as
possible.
By doing so, this bill actually creates more incentives for
illegals to
come here in the first place.
One of the highlights of the bill is that it requires the Executive >>>>>> Branch to close the border on an emergency basis if the number of
illegal entries exceeds 5000 in one week or 8500 in one day.
Except the bill also gives Joe Biden the authority to waive this
emergency requirement at any time at his discretion. So of course it >>>>>> will never be enforced. He and DHS Secretary Mayorkas could
effectively
just ignore this entire section of the law if it were passed.
The bill also doesn't count unaccompanied minors from countries other >>>>>> than Mexico and Canada toward the totals necessary for border
closings.
In other words, a significant percentage of illegals from Haiti,
Cuba,
Honduras, Pakistan, China, etc. simply don't count. We could have
20,000
of those show up in one day and it wouldn't count.
And on top of that, the bill doesn't *actually* close the border,
even
if this fraudulent 5000-illegal threshold is reached. Per one of the >>>>>> bill's co-authors, Senator Chris Murphy: "The bill contains a
requirement that the president funnel asylum claims to the land
ports of
entry when more than 5000 people cross in a day. The border never
closes
but claims must be processed at the ports."
So basically even if these arbitrary numbers are reached, the border >>>>>> never closes. The illegals are just re-directed to processing centers >>>>>> where they are then let into the country. It's a complete scam by
design. And a scam that's designed to last for a long time, given the >>>>>> bill's 3-year sunset provision. The idea being that if Trump does get >>>>>> re-elected, he'd be bound by the terms of this deal and couldn't do >>>>>> crazy things like ACTUALLY shut down the border and stop this
never-ending firehose of illegals.
In one key respect, this bill would actually *lessen* the
already-minimal standards for allowing illegals into the country.
Right
now, people applying for asylum need to show "a significant
possibility
that they can establish a credible fear of persecution on the
basis of
race, national origin, political beliefs, etc." Not a high
standard. It
doesn't require them to provide any actual evidence of their claims. >>>>>> Just make a claim, which they've been coached to say and which
they've
rehearsed, and then get into the country. But this border bill would >>>>>> lower that standard even further, if that's possible, from a
"significant" possibility of persecution to merely a "reasonable"
possibility of persecution. And reasonable is just another way of
saying
'plausible'. In other words, it's a bar that anyone from anywhere can >>>>>> clear. There's no way that anyone claiming asylum will ever get
turned
away if that's the standard.
The bill is an abomination that makes the border *less* secure
than it
already is, which is a remarkable feat that few, if any, people
imagined
was even possible.
Thank god the House Republicans said the bill was dead on arrival. >>>>>> But
it doesn't begin to explain why Senate Republicans thought there was >>>>>> anything here that could possibly be considered good for America.
It's as if the Senate is made up of politicians who despise their own >>>>>> citizens and whose top priority is the safety of foreigners in other >>>>>> countries thousands of miles from their own shores. And they know it. >>>>>>
When you confront them on why they've utterly failed at the
border, they
don't even try and justify their behavior. They just call you a
racist
for even asking the question. There's no political calculation that >>>>>> would explain their support for this nonsense. The American people, >>>>>> Democrats and Republicans alike are overwhelmingly upset about what's >>>>>> going on at the border. There's no support for it.
Polls clearly show that no one's buying the idea that we need a
nearly
$100 billion giveaway to Ukraine and Israel in order to do
something as
basic as enforcing the law here in America.
Nobody seriously thinks that it's appropriate to pay foreign
countries
vast sums of money to secure their borders while we allocate a
fraction
of that money to open up our own borders even more. Most Americans >>>>>> want
our leaders to prioritize our country before other countries. It
is not
an unreasonable thing for us to want.
Who wouldn't have given ANY amount of money to defeat Hitler in
WWII if
it meant no American lives would have been lost?
What sort of a moron thinks paying Hitler would have been necessary
before we could enforce our own laws here in America?
Oh, and notice how Effa, after demanding I tell him *again* what was in >>>> the bipartisan bill that was bad for America doesn't bother responding >>>> to any of it. Again.
Two weeks from now he'll be back to demanding I tell him what's bad
about the 'bipartisan border bill' again.
Nothing I wrote above is an excuse. It's a description of what's
actually in the bill. You won't address it because you know you can't
defend it.
YOU fuckers crafted the fucking bill. If it blows, it blows because
YOU fuckers made it blow.
Oh, I'm sorry. You seem to be under the impression I've been in
Washington DC lately writing legislation. *I* didn't do anything and
since I'm not a partisan simp like you, I can criticize politicians when
they do stupid shit even when they're on my 'side'.
I don't care who wrote the damn thing or who was bribed to say it's a
good thing when they know it's not. Legalize the flow of millions of
unvetted illegals per year into the country is objectively *not* a good
thing and this Orwellian shit where we pretend the border is secure
merely because we passed a bill to legalize the chaos is the height of
absurdity.
You asked for what you wanted. Dems said yes.
No, they didn't or the border would be secure. The Dems sure as shit
didn't give me what *I* wanted.
Republicans wrote the bill. YOU clowns WROTE THE BILL.
It's YOUR wishlist.
Then you clowns killed it because you were TOLD to by a Reality TV Show
Host.
How fucking pathetic is that?
On 3/10/24 2:55 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <uskdb8$300lk$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
They don't like their own bill because Donald Trump TOLD them not to
like it.
Sure. If it wasn't for Trump giving me orders, I'd *love* the idea of
8000 unvetted illegals per day streaming into the country.
You're a joke.
What's not funny is that you're right. You WOULD do it if Trump ordered it.
On 3/10/24 3:01 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <uskd6v$300lk$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 3/8/24 9:40 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <usgbfr$1vp6f$4@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>Because your excuses are BULLSHIT.
wrote:
On 3/6/24 12:45 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <usa2h0$g16c$5@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote:
On 3/4/24 1:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 4, 2024 at 5:56:21 AM PST, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>
Republicans themselves said this is the most far reaching bill, and >>>>>>>> includes everything they've been asking for for 20 years.
The week Biden took office, he issued 94 executive orders to open the >>>>>>> border and stand down enforcement of immigration law.
Until Biden rescinds those EOs, any claims he makes that he wants to >>>>>>> address illegal immigration are nothing but lies.
So answer his question. What was in the bill that was bad?
I already did an in-depth analysis of this abomination several weeks >>>>> ago, which you completely ignored and only responded to by insulting >>>>> Trump as per usual. Why should I do it all again just for you to ignore >>>>> it again?
Oh, hell, hope springs eternal and it's easy to copy and paste so here >>>>> goes:
The Republicans got most of what they wanted and that still wasn't >>>>>> good enough
Of course it wasn't good enough. And I don't know who you're referring >>>>> to specifically by 'the Republicans' but anyone who isn't a RINO got >>>>> next to nothing from this bill with regard to border security. And >>>>> that's being generous.
Even as hundreds of thousands of illegals stream across the border every
month, including thousands of gang members recently kicked out of prison
in places like El Salvador, looking for a friendlier place to commit >>>>> their crimes, this 'border deal' would have done absolutely nothing to >>>>> secure the border.
First, it's important to emphasize that no 'border deal' is necessary in
the first place. Under existing law, including the Immigration and >>>>> Nationality Act of 1952, the president of the United States has the >>>>> authority to turn every single illegal alien away at the border if he >>>>> determines it's necessary to safeguard the country, to include refugees.
There is no requirement that we entertain millions of fraudulent asylum >>>>> claims-- or even legitimate asylum claims, as rare as those may be. >>>>>
There is no legal requirement that we allow a single non-citizen into >>>>> this country. Period.
All that's necessary to secure the border is for the president of the >>>>> United States to start doing his damn job and enforcing the law, to >>>>> start using the power that he *already* legitimately and
constitutionally has. It doesn't need to be complicated. We just need to
start enforcing existing laws as they stand.
But if the White House actually adopted this simple and straightforward >>>>> solution, two things would happen:
(1) The Democrat Party would lose out on millions of future loyal voters
once the next stage of their plan is implemented: the 'path to
citizenship' for all the illegals we let in and who now will be
described as leading an 'unfair' twilight existence in our society which
can only be solved by making them citizens. Democrats' longstanding >>>>> plans for demographic replacement at the polls would be stymied.
(2) Congress would miss out on a chance to launder hundreds of millions >>>>> of dollars and Congress never misses out on an opportunity like that. >>>>>
So here we are.
The bill proposed in the Senate would allocate another $60 billion >>>>> dollars in military aid to Ukraine and $14 billion to Israel. (We
already give Israel billions every year-- what have they been doing with
that? Where has that money gone that we need to dump $14 billion more on
their doorstep?) That's a grand total of $74 billion going to secure the
borders of other countries. By comparison, the bill only allocates $20 >>>>> billion for U.S. border security.
So to restate for the slow kids in the back of the room: Our leaders are
proposing to spend roughly 400% more on securing the borders of two >>>>> other foreign countries than they are on securing the border of our own >>>>> country.
And it gets worse. Because even the money that's supposedly going for >>>>> our border security will actually in practice only facilitate the entry >>>>> of millions of more illegal aliens into the U.S. Specifically, the bill >>>>> allocates $2.3 billion for something called "refugee and entry
assistance activities" by giving "grants or contracts to qualified >>>>> organizations and non-profit entities to provide culturally and
linguistically appropriate services, including housing, medical, and >>>>> legal assistance and ease management assistance". (Ease management >>>>> assistance? WTF? Why am I paying for that?) So that's more than two >>>>> billion dollars to the left-wing 'non-profit' organizations that exist >>>>> principally to find ways to sneak as many illegals into this country as >>>>> possible.
By doing so, this bill actually creates more incentives for illegals to >>>>> come here in the first place.
One of the highlights of the bill is that it requires the Executive >>>>> Branch to close the border on an emergency basis if the number of
illegal entries exceeds 5000 in one week or 8500 in one day.
Except the bill also gives Joe Biden the authority to waive this
emergency requirement at any time at his discretion. So of course it >>>>> will never be enforced. He and DHS Secretary Mayorkas could effectively >>>>> just ignore this entire section of the law if it were passed.
The bill also doesn't count unaccompanied minors from countries other >>>>> than Mexico and Canada toward the totals necessary for border closings. >>>>> In other words, a significant percentage of illegals from Haiti, Cuba, >>>>> Honduras, Pakistan, China, etc. simply don't count. We could have 20,000
of those show up in one day and it wouldn't count.
And on top of that, the bill doesn't *actually* close the border, even >>>>> if this fraudulent 5000-illegal threshold is reached. Per one of the >>>>> bill's co-authors, Senator Chris Murphy: "The bill contains a
requirement that the president funnel asylum claims to the land ports of
entry when more than 5000 people cross in a day. The border never closes
but claims must be processed at the ports."
So basically even if these arbitrary numbers are reached, the border >>>>> never closes. The illegals are just re-directed to processing centers >>>>> where they are then let into the country. It's a complete scam by
design. And a scam that's designed to last for a long time, given the >>>>> bill's 3-year sunset provision. The idea being that if Trump does get >>>>> re-elected, he'd be bound by the terms of this deal and couldn't do >>>>> crazy things like ACTUALLY shut down the border and stop this
never-ending firehose of illegals.
In one key respect, this bill would actually *lessen* the
already-minimal standards for allowing illegals into the country. Right >>>>> now, people applying for asylum need to show "a significant possibility >>>>> that they can establish a credible fear of persecution on the basis of >>>>> race, national origin, political beliefs, etc." Not a high standard. It >>>>> doesn't require them to provide any actual evidence of their claims. >>>>> Just make a claim, which they've been coached to say and which they've >>>>> rehearsed, and then get into the country. But this border bill would >>>>> lower that standard even further, if that's possible, from a
"significant" possibility of persecution to merely a "reasonable"
possibility of persecution. And reasonable is just another way of saying
'plausible'. In other words, it's a bar that anyone from anywhere can >>>>> clear. There's no way that anyone claiming asylum will ever get turned >>>>> away if that's the standard.
The bill is an abomination that makes the border *less* secure than it >>>>> already is, which is a remarkable feat that few, if any, people imagined
was even possible.
Thank god the House Republicans said the bill was dead on arrival. But >>>>> it doesn't begin to explain why Senate Republicans thought there was >>>>> anything here that could possibly be considered good for America.
It's as if the Senate is made up of politicians who despise their own >>>>> citizens and whose top priority is the safety of foreigners in other >>>>> countries thousands of miles from their own shores. And they know it. >>>>>
When you confront them on why they've utterly failed at the border, they
don't even try and justify their behavior. They just call you a racist >>>>> for even asking the question. There's no political calculation that >>>>> would explain their support for this nonsense. The American people, >>>>> Democrats and Republicans alike are overwhelmingly upset about what's >>>>> going on at the border. There's no support for it.
Polls clearly show that no one's buying the idea that we need a nearly >>>>> $100 billion giveaway to Ukraine and Israel in order to do something as >>>>> basic as enforcing the law here in America.
Nobody seriously thinks that it's appropriate to pay foreign countries >>>>> vast sums of money to secure their borders while we allocate a fraction >>>>> of that money to open up our own borders even more. Most Americans want >>>>> our leaders to prioritize our country before other countries. It is not >>>>> an unreasonable thing for us to want.
Who wouldn't have given ANY amount of money to defeat Hitler in WWII if >>>> it meant no American lives would have been lost?
What sort of a moron thinks paying Hitler would have been necessary
before we could enforce our own laws here in America?
Oh, and notice how Effa, after demanding I tell him *again* what was in >>> the bipartisan bill that was bad for America doesn't bother responding >>> to any of it. Again.
Two weeks from now he'll be back to demanding I tell him what's bad
about the 'bipartisan border bill' again.
Nothing I wrote above is an excuse. It's a description of what's
actually in the bill. You won't address it because you know you can't defend it.
YOU fuckers crafted the fucking bill. If it blows, it blows because
YOU fuckers made it blow.
Oh, I'm sorry. You seem to be under the impression I've been in
Washington DC lately writing legislation. *I* didn't do anything and
since I'm not a partisan simp like you, I can criticize politicians when they do stupid shit even when they're on my 'side'.
I don't care who wrote the damn thing or who was bribed to say it's a
good thing when they know it's not. Legalize the flow of millions of unvetted illegals per year into the country is objectively *not* a good thing and this Orwellian shit where we pretend the border is secure
merely because we passed a bill to legalize the chaos is the height of absurdity.
You asked for what you wanted. Dems said yes.
No, they didn't or the border would be secure. The Dems sure as shit
didn't give me what *I* wanted.
It's YOUR wishlist.
On 3/11/24 3:10 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <usmtaj$3ju6f$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 3/10/24 3:01 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <uskd6v$300lk$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 3/8/24 9:40 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <usgbfr$1vp6f$4@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote:Because your excuses are BULLSHIT.
On 3/6/24 12:45 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <usa2h0$g16c$5@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> wrote:
On 3/4/24 1:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 4, 2024 at 5:56:21 AM PST, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
Republicans themselves said this is the most far reaching >>>>>>>>>>> bill, andThe week Biden took office, he issued 94 executive orders to >>>>>>>>>> open the
includes everything they've been asking for for 20 years. >>>>>>>>>>
border and stand down enforcement of immigration law.
Until Biden rescinds those EOs, any claims he makes that he >>>>>>>>>> wants to
address illegal immigration are nothing but lies.
So answer his question. What was in the bill that was bad?
I already did an in-depth analysis of this abomination several >>>>>>>> weeks
ago, which you completely ignored and only responded to by
insulting
Trump as per usual. Why should I do it all again just for you to >>>>>>>> ignore
it again?
Oh, hell, hope springs eternal and it's easy to copy and paste >>>>>>>> so here
goes:
The Republicans got most of what they wanted and that still wasn't >>>>>>>>> good enough
Of course it wasn't good enough. And I don't know who you're
referring
to specifically by 'the Republicans' but anyone who isn't a RINO >>>>>>>> got
next to nothing from this bill with regard to border security. And >>>>>>>> that's being generous.
Even as hundreds of thousands of illegals stream across the
border every
month, including thousands of gang members recently kicked out >>>>>>>> of prison
in places like El Salvador, looking for a friendlier place to
commit
their crimes, this 'border deal' would have done absolutely
nothing to
secure the border.
First, it's important to emphasize that no 'border deal' is
necessary in
the first place. Under existing law, including the Immigration and >>>>>>>> Nationality Act of 1952, the president of the United States has the >>>>>>>> authority to turn every single illegal alien away at the border >>>>>>>> if he
determines it's necessary to safeguard the country, to include >>>>>>>> refugees.
There is no requirement that we entertain millions of fraudulent >>>>>>>> asylum
claims-- or even legitimate asylum claims, as rare as those may be. >>>>>>>>
There is no legal requirement that we allow a single non-citizen >>>>>>>> into
this country. Period.
All that's necessary to secure the border is for the president >>>>>>>> of the
United States to start doing his damn job and enforcing the law, to >>>>>>>> start using the power that he *already* legitimately and
constitutionally has. It doesn't need to be complicated. We just >>>>>>>> need to
start enforcing existing laws as they stand.
But if the White House actually adopted this simple and
straightforward
solution, two things would happen:
(1) The Democrat Party would lose out on millions of future
loyal voters
once the next stage of their plan is implemented: the 'path to >>>>>>>> citizenship' for all the illegals we let in and who now will be >>>>>>>> described as leading an 'unfair' twilight existence in our
society which
can only be solved by making them citizens. Democrats' longstanding >>>>>>>> plans for demographic replacement at the polls would be stymied. >>>>>>>>
(2) Congress would miss out on a chance to launder hundreds of >>>>>>>> millions
of dollars and Congress never misses out on an opportunity like >>>>>>>> that.
So here we are.
The bill proposed in the Senate would allocate another $60 billion >>>>>>>> dollars in military aid to Ukraine and $14 billion to Israel. (We >>>>>>>> already give Israel billions every year-- what have they been
doing with
that? Where has that money gone that we need to dump $14 billion >>>>>>>> more on
their doorstep?) That's a grand total of $74 billion going to
secure the
borders of other countries. By comparison, the bill only
allocates $20
billion for U.S. border security.
So to restate for the slow kids in the back of the room: Our
leaders are
proposing to spend roughly 400% more on securing the borders of two >>>>>>>> other foreign countries than they are on securing the border of >>>>>>>> our own
country.
And it gets worse. Because even the money that's supposedly
going for
our border security will actually in practice only facilitate
the entry
of millions of more illegal aliens into the U.S. Specifically, >>>>>>>> the bill
allocates $2.3 billion for something called "refugee and entry >>>>>>>> assistance activities" by giving "grants or contracts to qualified >>>>>>>> organizations and non-profit entities to provide culturally and >>>>>>>> linguistically appropriate services, including housing, medical, >>>>>>>> and
legal assistance and ease management assistance". (Ease management >>>>>>>> assistance? WTF? Why am I paying for that?) So that's more than two >>>>>>>> billion dollars to the left-wing 'non-profit' organizations that >>>>>>>> exist
principally to find ways to sneak as many illegals into this
country as
possible.
By doing so, this bill actually creates more incentives for
illegals to
come here in the first place.
One of the highlights of the bill is that it requires the Executive >>>>>>>> Branch to close the border on an emergency basis if the number of >>>>>>>> illegal entries exceeds 5000 in one week or 8500 in one day.
Except the bill also gives Joe Biden the authority to waive this >>>>>>>> emergency requirement at any time at his discretion. So of
course it
will never be enforced. He and DHS Secretary Mayorkas could
effectively
just ignore this entire section of the law if it were passed.
The bill also doesn't count unaccompanied minors from countries >>>>>>>> other
than Mexico and Canada toward the totals necessary for border
closings.
In other words, a significant percentage of illegals from Haiti, >>>>>>>> Cuba,
Honduras, Pakistan, China, etc. simply don't count. We could
have 20,000
of those show up in one day and it wouldn't count.
And on top of that, the bill doesn't *actually* close the
border, even
if this fraudulent 5000-illegal threshold is reached. Per one of >>>>>>>> the
bill's co-authors, Senator Chris Murphy: "The bill contains a
requirement that the president funnel asylum claims to the land >>>>>>>> ports of
entry when more than 5000 people cross in a day. The border
never closes
but claims must be processed at the ports."
So basically even if these arbitrary numbers are reached, the
border
never closes. The illegals are just re-directed to processing
centers
where they are then let into the country. It's a complete scam by >>>>>>>> design. And a scam that's designed to last for a long time,
given the
bill's 3-year sunset provision. The idea being that if Trump
does get
re-elected, he'd be bound by the terms of this deal and couldn't do >>>>>>>> crazy things like ACTUALLY shut down the border and stop this
never-ending firehose of illegals.
In one key respect, this bill would actually *lessen* the
already-minimal standards for allowing illegals into the
country. Right
now, people applying for asylum need to show "a significant
possibility
that they can establish a credible fear of persecution on the
basis of
race, national origin, political beliefs, etc." Not a high
standard. It
doesn't require them to provide any actual evidence of their
claims.
Just make a claim, which they've been coached to say and which >>>>>>>> they've
rehearsed, and then get into the country. But this border bill >>>>>>>> would
lower that standard even further, if that's possible, from a
"significant" possibility of persecution to merely a "reasonable" >>>>>>>> possibility of persecution. And reasonable is just another way >>>>>>>> of saying
'plausible'. In other words, it's a bar that anyone from
anywhere can
clear. There's no way that anyone claiming asylum will ever get >>>>>>>> turned
away if that's the standard.
The bill is an abomination that makes the border *less* secure >>>>>>>> than it
already is, which is a remarkable feat that few, if any, people >>>>>>>> imagined
was even possible.
Thank god the House Republicans said the bill was dead on
arrival. But
it doesn't begin to explain why Senate Republicans thought there >>>>>>>> was
anything here that could possibly be considered good for America. >>>>>>>>
It's as if the Senate is made up of politicians who despise
their own
citizens and whose top priority is the safety of foreigners in >>>>>>>> other
countries thousands of miles from their own shores. And they
know it.
When you confront them on why they've utterly failed at the
border, they
don't even try and justify their behavior. They just call you a >>>>>>>> racist
for even asking the question. There's no political calculation that >>>>>>>> would explain their support for this nonsense. The American people, >>>>>>>> Democrats and Republicans alike are overwhelmingly upset about >>>>>>>> what's
going on at the border. There's no support for it.
Polls clearly show that no one's buying the idea that we need a >>>>>>>> nearly
$100 billion giveaway to Ukraine and Israel in order to do
something as
basic as enforcing the law here in America.
Nobody seriously thinks that it's appropriate to pay foreign
countries
vast sums of money to secure their borders while we allocate a >>>>>>>> fraction
of that money to open up our own borders even more. Most
Americans want
our leaders to prioritize our country before other countries. It >>>>>>>> is not
an unreasonable thing for us to want.
Who wouldn't have given ANY amount of money to defeat Hitler in
WWII if
it meant no American lives would have been lost?
What sort of a moron thinks paying Hitler would have been necessary >>>>>> before we could enforce our own laws here in America?
Oh, and notice how Effa, after demanding I tell him *again* what
was in
the bipartisan bill that was bad for America doesn't bother
responding
to any of it. Again.
Two weeks from now he'll be back to demanding I tell him what's bad >>>>>> about the 'bipartisan border bill' again.
Nothing I wrote above is an excuse. It's a description of what's
actually in the bill. You won't address it because you know you can't
defend it.
YOU fuckers crafted the fucking bill. If it blows, it blows because
YOU fuckers made it blow.
Oh, I'm sorry. You seem to be under the impression I've been in
Washington DC lately writing legislation. *I* didn't do anything and
since I'm not a partisan simp like you, I can criticize politicians
when
they do stupid shit even when they're on my 'side'.
I don't care who wrote the damn thing or who was bribed to say it's a
good thing when they know it's not. Legalize the flow of millions of
unvetted illegals per year into the country is objectively *not* a good >>>> thing and this Orwellian shit where we pretend the border is secure
merely because we passed a bill to legalize the chaos is the height of >>>> absurdity.
You asked for what you wanted. Dems said yes.
No, they didn't or the border would be secure. The Dems sure as shit
didn't give me what *I* wanted.
It's YOUR wishlist.
It's obviously not my wishlist or I wouldn't be complaining about it.
Simple logic eludes you yet again.
Sure, because every time your side gets caught with their pants down you pretend you're not part of the movement.
Didn't work then, doesn't work now. You're one of those "fellow
travelers" you keep talking about.
Even though you've used that phrase every chance you get, you're trying
to distance yourself from it when it's applied to YOU.
Pot, meet kettle.
On 3/10/24 2:55 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <uskdb8$300lk$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 3/8/24 8:40 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <usgbfr$1vp6f$4@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote:
On 3/6/24 12:45 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <usa2h0$g16c$5@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote:
On 3/4/24 1:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 4, 2024 at 5:56:21 AM PST, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
Republicans themselves said this is the most far reaching
bill, and
includes everything they've been asking for for 20 years.
The week Biden took office, he issued 94 executive orders to >>>>>>>>> open the
border and stand down enforcement of immigration law.
Until Biden rescinds those EOs, any claims he makes that he
wants to
address illegal immigration are nothing but lies.
So answer his question. What was in the bill that was bad?
I already did an in-depth analysis of this abomination several weeks >>>>>>> ago, which you completely ignored and only responded to by insulting >>>>>>> Trump as per usual. Why should I do it all again just for you to >>>>>>> ignore
it again?
Oh, hell, hope springs eternal and it's easy to copy and paste so >>>>>>> here
goes:
The Republicans got most of what they wanted and that still wasn't >>>>>>>> good enough
Of course it wasn't good enough. And I don't know who you're
referring
to specifically by 'the Republicans' but anyone who isn't a RINO got >>>>>>> next to nothing from this bill with regard to border security. And >>>>>>> that's being generous.
Even as hundreds of thousands of illegals stream across the border >>>>>>> every
month, including thousands of gang members recently kicked out of >>>>>>> prison
in places like El Salvador, looking for a friendlier place to commit >>>>>>> their crimes, this 'border deal' would have done absolutely
nothing to
secure the border.
First, it's important to emphasize that no 'border deal' is
necessary in
the first place. Under existing law, including the Immigration and >>>>>>> Nationality Act of 1952, the president of the United States has the >>>>>>> authority to turn every single illegal alien away at the border
if he
determines it's necessary to safeguard the country, to include
refugees.
There is no requirement that we entertain millions of fraudulent >>>>>>> asylum
claims-- or even legitimate asylum claims, as rare as those may be. >>>>>>>
There is no legal requirement that we allow a single non-citizen >>>>>>> into
this country. Period.
All that's necessary to secure the border is for the president of >>>>>>> the
United States to start doing his damn job and enforcing the law, to >>>>>>> start using the power that he *already* legitimately and
constitutionally has. It doesn't need to be complicated. We just >>>>>>> need to
start enforcing existing laws as they stand.
But if the White House actually adopted this simple and
straightforward
solution, two things would happen:
(1) The Democrat Party would lose out on millions of future loyal >>>>>>> voters
once the next stage of their plan is implemented: the 'path to
citizenship' for all the illegals we let in and who now will be
described as leading an 'unfair' twilight existence in our society >>>>>>> which
can only be solved by making them citizens. Democrats' longstanding >>>>>>> plans for demographic replacement at the polls would be stymied. >>>>>>>
(2) Congress would miss out on a chance to launder hundreds of
millions
of dollars and Congress never misses out on an opportunity like
that.
So here we are.
The bill proposed in the Senate would allocate another $60 billion >>>>>>> dollars in military aid to Ukraine and $14 billion to Israel. (We >>>>>>> already give Israel billions every year-- what have they been doing >>>>>>> with
that? Where has that money gone that we need to dump $14 billion >>>>>>> more on
their doorstep?) That's a grand total of $74 billion going to secure >>>>>>> the
borders of other countries. By comparison, the bill only
allocates $20
billion for U.S. border security.
So to restate for the slow kids in the back of the room: Our leaders >>>>>>> are
proposing to spend roughly 400% more on securing the borders of two >>>>>>> other foreign countries than they are on securing the border of
our own
country.
And it gets worse. Because even the money that's supposedly going >>>>>>> for
our border security will actually in practice only facilitate the >>>>>>> entry
of millions of more illegal aliens into the U.S. Specifically,
the bill
allocates $2.3 billion for something called "refugee and entry
assistance activities" by giving "grants or contracts to qualified >>>>>>> organizations and non-profit entities to provide culturally and
linguistically appropriate services, including housing, medical, and >>>>>>> legal assistance and ease management assistance". (Ease management >>>>>>> assistance? WTF? Why am I paying for that?) So that's more than two >>>>>>> billion dollars to the left-wing 'non-profit' organizations that >>>>>>> exist
principally to find ways to sneak as many illegals into this
country as
possible.
By doing so, this bill actually creates more incentives for
illegals to
come here in the first place.
One of the highlights of the bill is that it requires the Executive >>>>>>> Branch to close the border on an emergency basis if the number of >>>>>>> illegal entries exceeds 5000 in one week or 8500 in one day.
Except the bill also gives Joe Biden the authority to waive this >>>>>>> emergency requirement at any time at his discretion. So of course it >>>>>>> will never be enforced. He and DHS Secretary Mayorkas could
effectively
just ignore this entire section of the law if it were passed.
The bill also doesn't count unaccompanied minors from countries
other
than Mexico and Canada toward the totals necessary for border
closings.
In other words, a significant percentage of illegals from Haiti, >>>>>>> Cuba,
Honduras, Pakistan, China, etc. simply don't count. We could have >>>>>>> 20,000
of those show up in one day and it wouldn't count.
And on top of that, the bill doesn't *actually* close the border, >>>>>>> even
if this fraudulent 5000-illegal threshold is reached. Per one of the >>>>>>> bill's co-authors, Senator Chris Murphy: "The bill contains a
requirement that the president funnel asylum claims to the land
ports of
entry when more than 5000 people cross in a day. The border never >>>>>>> closes
but claims must be processed at the ports."
So basically even if these arbitrary numbers are reached, the border >>>>>>> never closes. The illegals are just re-directed to processing
centers
where they are then let into the country. It's a complete scam by >>>>>>> design. And a scam that's designed to last for a long time, given >>>>>>> the
bill's 3-year sunset provision. The idea being that if Trump does >>>>>>> get
re-elected, he'd be bound by the terms of this deal and couldn't do >>>>>>> crazy things like ACTUALLY shut down the border and stop this
never-ending firehose of illegals.
In one key respect, this bill would actually *lessen* the
already-minimal standards for allowing illegals into the country. >>>>>>> Right
now, people applying for asylum need to show "a significant
possibility
that they can establish a credible fear of persecution on the
basis of
race, national origin, political beliefs, etc." Not a high
standard. It
doesn't require them to provide any actual evidence of their claims. >>>>>>> Just make a claim, which they've been coached to say and which
they've
rehearsed, and then get into the country. But this border bill would >>>>>>> lower that standard even further, if that's possible, from a
"significant" possibility of persecution to merely a "reasonable" >>>>>>> possibility of persecution. And reasonable is just another way of >>>>>>> saying
'plausible'. In other words, it's a bar that anyone from anywhere >>>>>>> can
clear. There's no way that anyone claiming asylum will ever get
turned
away if that's the standard.
The bill is an abomination that makes the border *less* secure
than it
already is, which is a remarkable feat that few, if any, people
imagined
was even possible.
Thank god the House Republicans said the bill was dead on
arrival. But
it doesn't begin to explain why Senate Republicans thought there was >>>>>>> anything here that could possibly be considered good for America. >>>>>>>
It's as if the Senate is made up of politicians who despise their >>>>>>> own
citizens and whose top priority is the safety of foreigners in other >>>>>>> countries thousands of miles from their own shores. And they know >>>>>>> it.
When you confront them on why they've utterly failed at the border, >>>>>>> they
don't even try and justify their behavior. They just call you a
racist
for even asking the question. There's no political calculation that >>>>>>> would explain their support for this nonsense. The American people, >>>>>>> Democrats and Republicans alike are overwhelmingly upset about
what's
going on at the border. There's no support for it.
Polls clearly show that no one's buying the idea that we need a
nearly
$100 billion giveaway to Ukraine and Israel in order to do
something as
basic as enforcing the law here in America.
Nobody seriously thinks that it's appropriate to pay foreign
countries
vast sums of money to secure their borders while we allocate a
fraction
of that money to open up our own borders even more. Most
Americans want
our leaders to prioritize our country before other countries. It >>>>>>> is not
an unreasonable thing for us to want.
Who wouldn't have given ANY amount of money to defeat Hitler in
WWII if
it meant no American lives would have been lost?
What sort of a moron thinks paying Hitler would have been necessary
before we could enforce our own laws here in America?
Oh, and notice how Effa, after demanding I tell him *again* what
was in
the bipartisan bill that was bad for America doesn't bother responding >>>>> to any of it. Again.
Two weeks from now he'll be back to demanding I tell him what's bad
about the 'bipartisan border bill' again.
They don't like their own bill because Donald Trump TOLD them not to
like it.
Sure. If it wasn't for Trump giving me orders, I'd *love* the idea of
8000 unvetted illegals per day streaming into the country.
You're a joke.
What's not funny is that you're right. You WOULD do it if Trump ordered
it.
On 3/11/24 3:10 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <usmtaj$3ju6f$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 3/10/24 3:01 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <uskd6v$300lk$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
You asked for what you wanted. Dems said yes.
No, they didn't or the border would be secure. The Dems sure as shit
didn't give me what *I* wanted.
It's YOUR wishlist.
It's obviously not my wishlist or I wouldn't be complaining about it.
Simple logic eludes you yet again.
Sure, because every time your side gets caught with their pants down you pretend you're not part of the movement.
On 3/11/24 3:13 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <usmt6h$3ju6f$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 3/10/24 2:55 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <uskdb8$300lk$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
What's not funny is that you're right. You WOULD do it if Trump ordered it.They don't like their own bill because Donald Trump TOLD them not to >>>> like it.
Sure. If it wasn't for Trump giving me orders, I'd *love* the idea of
8000 unvetted illegals per day streaming into the country.
You're a joke.
Well, that's a lie, but then what else have we come to expect from you?
You'd suck his ass clean if he asked.
On 3/12/24 5:30 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <usp0h8$5qt4$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 3/11/24 3:13 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <usmt6h$3ju6f$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 3/10/24 2:55 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <uskdb8$300lk$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote:
What's not funny is that you're right. You WOULD do it if TrumpThey don't like their own bill because Donald Trump TOLD them not to >>>>>>> like it.
Sure. If it wasn't for Trump giving me orders, I'd *love* the idea of >>>>>> 8000 unvetted illegals per day streaming into the country.
You're a joke.
ordered it.
Well, that's a lie, but then what else have we come to expect from you? >>>>
You'd suck his ass clean if he asked.
Well, that's a lie, but then what else have we come to expect from you?
Sure, taint-breath, sure. Because a guy who takes his marching orders from a rapist would never stoop that low, now would he?
In article <usmt6h$3ju6f$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 3/10/24 2:55 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <uskdb8$300lk$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
What's not funny is that you're right. You WOULD do it if Trump ordered it.They don't like their own bill because Donald Trump TOLD them not to
like it.
Sure. If it wasn't for Trump giving me orders, I'd *love* the idea of
8000 unvetted illegals per day streaming into the country.
You're a joke.
Well, that's a lie, but then what else have we come to expect from you?
In article <usp0lr$5qt4$3@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 3/11/24 3:10 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <usmtaj$3ju6f$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 3/10/24 3:01 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <uskd6v$300lk$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote:
Sure, because every time your side gets caught with their pants down youYou asked for what you wanted. Dems said yes.
No, they didn't or the border would be secure. The Dems sure as shit >>>>> didn't give me what *I* wanted.
It's YOUR wishlist.
It's obviously not my wishlist or I wouldn't be complaining about it.
Simple logic eludes you yet again.
pretend you're not part of the movement.
I didn't even get to vote for a presidential candidate in the March 5
primary because I don't belong to a political party.
You keep lying and saying I'm a registered Republican when I'm factually
not and have a well-documented history of criticizing Republicans for
their stupid shit, this border bill being just the latest dumbass move
on their part.
You lying and pretending I liked the bill (and even personally wrote
some of it?!?) until Trump called me up and told me to stop liking it is
just some weird proto-masturbatory fantasy on your part, Shit-Shoes.
On Feb 26, 2024 at 1:05:42 AM PST, trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/after-nex-benedicts-death-lgbtq-oklahomans-vow-to-not-let-the-hate-take-over
After Nex Benedict's death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to 'not let the hate
take over'
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans. This >>non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died from his >>injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the country from
this but only one political party will have the balls to talk about it.
Oh, Hutt, where were you when a high school girl in Loudoun County, VA was >violently raped in her high school restroom by a troon boy wearing dress >because leftists thought it was a good idea to let boys into girls' restrooms? >(And then the high school admin tried to cover it up and had the girl's father >arrested for trying to expose the whole vile incident at a school board >meeting.)
You don't seem to care about kids being violently attacked by other kids if >you can't point one of your grotesque claws at it and screech "Republicans!"
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
On Feb 26, 2024 at 1:05:42 AM PST, trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/after-nex-benedicts-death-lgbtq-oklahoma
ns-vow-to-not-let-the-hate-take-over
After Nex Benedict's death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to 'not let the hate >>take over'
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans. This >>non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died from his >>injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the country from
this but only one political party will have the balls to talk about it.
Oh, Hutt, where were you when a high school girl in Loudoun County, VA was >violently raped in her high school restroom by a troon boy wearing dress >because leftists thought it was a good idea to let boys into girls' >restrooms? (And then the high school admin tried to cover it up and had
the girl's father arrested for trying to expose the whole vile incident
at a school board meeting.)
You don't seem to care about kids being violently attacked by other kids if >you can't point one of your grotesque claws at it and screech "Republicans!"
Death of nonbinary teen Nex Benedict after school fight is ruled a
suicide, medical examiner says
By SEAN MURPHY
AP
Updated 5:18 PM CDT, March 13, 2024 https://apnews.com/article/nonbinary-student-death-nex-benedict-oklahoma-owass
o-88f403bfd5436a53b636dcc2bc59ebf8
In article <ustef3$17dvd$1@dont-email.me>,
"Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
On Feb 26, 2024 at 1:05:42 AM PST, trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/after-nex-benedicts-death-lgbtq-oklahoma
ns-vow-to-not-let-the-hate-take-over
After Nex Benedict's death, LGBTQ+ Oklahomans vow to 'not let the hate >>>> take over'
Another low point in American history courtesy of Republicans. This
non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died from his
injuries. There should be a warning cry throughout the country from
this but only one political party will have the balls to talk about it.
Oh, Hutt, where were you when a high school girl in Loudoun County, VA was >>> violently raped in her high school restroom by a troon boy wearing dress >>> because leftists thought it was a good idea to let boys into girls'
restrooms? (And then the high school admin tried to cover it up and had
the girl's father arrested for trying to expose the whole vile incident
at a school board meeting.)
You don't seem to care about kids being violently attacked by other kids if >>> you can't point one of your grotesque claws at it and screech "Republicans!"
Death of nonbinary teen Nex Benedict after school fight is ruled a
suicide, medical examiner says
Well, shit. I wonder if we'll be getting an apology from Hutt any time
soon.
By SEAN MURPHY
AP
Updated 5:18 PM CDT, March 13, 2024
https://apnews.com/article/nonbinary-student-death-nex-benedict-oklahoma-owass
o-88f403bfd5436a53b636dcc2bc59ebf8
Media Ran With Claim That 'Nonbinary' Teen Died from 'Brain Trauma' Caused
by Bullies. It Was Actually a Drug Overdose.
A medical examiner has determined that the death of Oklahoma "nonbinary" teenager Nex Benedict, which became a national news story based on media suggestions that the teen died from a beating by bullies, actually died from an intentional drug overdose.
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
Media Ran With Claim That 'Nonbinary' Teen Died from 'Brain Trauma' Caused >> by Bullies. It Was Actually a Drug Overdose.
Not just the media. Trotsky the Hutt, our very own suborbital cockwagon
here on RAT, did as well.
In article <ut1cud$28n2t$2@dont-email.me>,
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
Media Ran With Claim That 'Nonbinary' Teen Died from 'Brain Trauma' Caused >> by Bullies. It Was Actually a Drug Overdose.
Not just the media. Trotsky the Hutt, our very own suborbital cockwagon
here on RAT, did as well.
A medical examiner has determined that the death of Oklahoma "nonbinary"
teenager Nex Benedict, which became a national news story based on media
suggestions that the teen died from a beating by bullies, actually died from >> an intentional drug overdose.
In article <ut1cud$28n2t$2@dont-email.me>,
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
Media Ran With Claim That 'Nonbinary' Teen Died from 'Brain Trauma' Caused >> by Bullies. It Was Actually a Drug Overdose.
Not just the media. Trotsky the Hutt, our very own suborbital cockwagon
here on RAT, did as well.
A medical examiner has determined that the death of Oklahoma "nonbinary"
teenager Nex Benedict, which became a national news story based on media
suggestions that the teen died from a beating by bullies, actually died from >> an intentional drug overdose.
A medical examiner has determined that the death of Oklahoma "nonbinary" teenager Nex Benedict, which became a national news story based on media suggestions that the teen died from a beating by bullies, actually died from an intentional drug overdose.
In a statement, the Owasso Police Department said it waited to release the cause of death until the toxicology report was completed, KJRH reported. That toxicology report indicates that Benedict died by suicide, the result of an overdose of Diphenhydramine and Fluoxetine, or, Benadryl and Prozac.
"From the beginning of this investigation, Owasso Police observed many indications that this death was the result of suicide," the police statement said. "However, investigators did not wish to confirm that information without the final results being presented by the Oklahoma Medical Examiners Office."
The original narrative surrounding Benedict's death was that the teen died as a result of a beating from three girls who had been bullying Benedict and Benedict's friends. Teen Vogue reported
atropos@mac.com wrote:
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
Media Ran With Claim That 'Nonbinary' Teen Died from 'Brain Trauma' Caused >>> by Bullies. It Was Actually a Drug Overdose.
Not just the media. Trotsky the Hutt, our very own suborbital cockwagon
here on RAT, did as well.
One would think these Leftists would eventually learn their lesson, but no...
On 3/17/24 3:30 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:
atropos@mac.com wrote:
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
Media Ran With Claim That 'Nonbinary' Teen Died from 'Brain Trauma'
Caused by Bullies. It Was Actually a Drug Overdose.
Not just the media. Trotsky the Hutt, our very own suborbital cockwagon
here on RAT, did as well.
One would think these Leftists would eventually learn their lesson, but
no...
I learned my lesson,
On 3/17/24 3:08 PM, trotsky wrote:
On 3/17/24 3:30 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:
atropos@mac.com wrote:
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
Media Ran With Claim That 'Nonbinary' Teen Died from 'Brain Trauma'
Caused
by Bullies. It Was Actually a Drug Overdose.
Not just the media. Trotsky the Hutt, our very own suborbital cockwagon >>>> here on RAT, did as well.
One would think these Leftists would eventually learn their lesson,
but no...
I learned my lesson, I stopped reading Teen Vogue. Ubi-Pubie, not so
much.
Ubi and Matt Gaetz, why am I not surprised at the pairing?
This non-binary kid was beaten so severely in school that he died from
his [sic] injuries.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 64:10:27 |
| Calls: | 6,712 |
| Files: | 12,244 |
| Messages: | 5,356,124 |