In article <uql3i3$3apnk$2@dont-email.me>, Ian J. Ball
<ijball@mac.invalid> wrote:

On 2/15/24 1:30 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:

Explicit sexual content on television shows is so common it's not even shocking anymore.

What idiot wrote this?!

Somebody named Amanda Harding. It's from the Daily Wire.

This isn't even remotely true as sex, and esp. nudity, is generally impossible to find on TV these days, with only the barest of
exceptions...

Ubi stole the article from here:

https://www.dailywire.com/news/sexier-with-clothes-on-the-bear-wins-emmy s-attracts-fans-without-sex-and-nudity

The Daily Wire requires you to create an account in order to read it at
their site. Yeah, stuff that.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 2/15/24 1:30 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:

Explicit sexual content on television shows is so common it's not even shocking anymore.

What idiot wrote this?! This isn't even remotely true as sex, and esp.
nudity, is generally impossible to find on TV these days, with only the
barest of exceptions...

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 05:28:35 -0800, "Ian J. Ball" <ijball@mac.invalid>
wrote:

On 2/15/24 1:30 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:

Explicit sexual content on television shows is so common it's not even
shocking anymore.

What idiot wrote this?! This isn't even remotely true as sex, and esp. >nudity, is generally impossible to find on TV these days, with only the >barest of exceptions...

Maybe they were thinking of the UK where it is much more common than
on USA TV.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Ian J. Ball <ijball@mac.invalid> wrote:

On 2/15/24 1:30 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:

Explicit sexual content on television shows is so common it's not even >>shocking anymore.

What idiot wrote this?! This isn't even remotely true as sex, and esp. >nudity, is generally impossible to find on TV these days, with only the >barest of exceptions...

Gee, it's Ubi the shithead plagarizing again.

Sexier With Clothes On? 'The Bear' Wins Emmys, Attracts Fans Without Sex
And Nudity
By Amanda Harding
The Daily Wire
Feb 14, 2024 https://www.dailywire.com/news/sexier-with-clothes-on-the-bear-wins-emmys-attracts-fans-without-sex-and-nudity

Sex and nudity seems impractical in a working restaurant kitchen.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

In article <uql3i3$3apnk$2@dont-email.me>,
"Ian J. Ball" <ijball@mac.invalid> wrote:

On 2/15/24 1:30 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:

Explicit sexual content on television shows is so common it's not even shocking anymore.

What idiot wrote this?! This isn't even remotely true as sex, and esp. nudity, is generally impossible to find on TV these days, with only the barest of exceptions...

And when it does occur, it's almost always some dude's hairy ass that no
one but Hutt wants to see anyway.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 2/15/24 12:29 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <uql3i3$3apnk$2@dont-email.me>,
"Ian J. Ball" <ijball@mac.invalid> wrote:

On 2/15/24 1:30 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:

Explicit sexual content on television shows is so common it's not even
shocking anymore.

What idiot wrote this?! This isn't even remotely true as sex, and esp.
nudity, is generally impossible to find on TV these days, with only the
barest of exceptions...

And when it does occur, it's almost always some dude's hairy ass that no
one but Hutt wants to see anyway.

I can't say I blame you, your gay online buddies are the only one's that
will listen to this shit. I am glad I reduced you to a babbling troll
again, anyway. BABTA--Be A Babbling Troll Again.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

In article <150220240853220290%nope@noway.com>, nope@noway.com wrote:

Ian J. Ball <ijball@mac.invalid> wrote:

On 2/15/24 1:30 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:

Explicit sexual content on television shows is so common it's not even
shocking anymore.

What idiot wrote this?!

This isn't even remotely true as sex, and esp. nudity, is generally
impossible to find on TV these days, with only the barest of
exceptions...

Ubi stole the article from here:

TROLL-O-METER

5* 6* *7
4* *8
3* *9
2* *10
1* | *stuporous
0* -*- *catatonic
* |\ *comatose
* \ *clinical death
* \ *biological death
* _\/ *demonic apparition
* * *damned for all eternity

The Daily Wire requires you to create an account in order to read it at
their site. Yeah, stuff that.

Or... you read the attributed article I posted that you replied to.

--
Let's go Brandon!

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

In article <uqlg95$3d06a$3@dont-email.me>, ahk@chinet.com wrote:

Ian J. Ball <ijball@mac.invalid> wrote:

On 2/15/24 1:30 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:

Explicit sexual content on television shows is so common it's not even >>>shocking anymore.

What idiot wrote this?! This isn't even remotely true as sex, and esp. >>nudity, is generally impossible to find on TV these days, with only the >>barest of exceptions...

Gee, it's Ubi the shithead plagarizing again.

TROLL-O-METER

5* 6* *7
4* *8
3* *9
2* *10
1* | *stuporous
0* -*- *catatonic
* |\ *comatose
* \ *clinical death
* \ *biological death
* _\/ *demonic apparition
* * *damned for all eternity

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)