BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
no_email@invalid.invalid wrote:disappointment who
In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that Biden can remove razor wire
installed by Texas on the border.
The three liberals on the court were joined by Justices Roberts and Barrett.
John Roberts is a chameleon and Amy Coney Barrett has become a
is a Roberts mini-me.
The Biden administration will likely seize Shelby Park from Texas and >>>> remove any border fences that were installed. (Because the only action >>>> Biden actually takes at the border is to remove any barriers to thousands >>>> flooding across. He'd remove the Rio Grande itself if he could.)
How can there be a "border security deal" with a Biden Administration that
just fought all the way to the Supreme Court to stop border security?
Why hasn't Biden been impeached for the fourth or fifth time?
The Texas National Guard has defied the SCOTUS ruling and installed more
razor wire and barriers at Shelby Park in Eagle Pass, Texas.
The standoff with the TX National Guard is a lose-lose for the Biden White >> House.
Either they send troops down to remove the barriers and wires, showing
America that they'll physically fight other Americans in uniform to make it >> easier for illegals to get in.
Or they let Texas continue to provide the public with visuals of what
actual border security and enforcement looks like.
Yeah? It would have been awfully nice if they'd plucked that drowning
woman and children out of the Rio Grande, since they've taken over
patrols and they were separated by the fence. And they can come to
Chicago to pick up everyone they sent here.
no_email@invalid.invalid wrote:
In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that Biden can remove razor wire >> installed by Texas on the border.
The three liberals on the court were joined by Justices Roberts and Barrett.
John Roberts is a chameleon and Amy Coney Barrett has become a disappointment who
is a Roberts mini-me.
The Biden administration will likely seize Shelby Park from Texas and
remove any border fences that were installed. (Because the only action
Biden actually takes at the border is to remove any barriers to thousands >> flooding across. He'd remove the Rio Grande itself if he could.)
How can there be a "border security deal" with a Biden Administration that >> just fought all the way to the Supreme Court to stop border security?
Why hasn't Biden been impeached for the fourth or fifth time?
BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
And they can come to Chicago to pick up everyone they sent here.
Nope. Y'all talked the sanctuary city talk. Now you have to walk the walk.
That was never my idea. That takes idiotic aldermen and our even more
idiotic voters.
Adam H. Kerman
Texas wasn't there and they kept the federal government out. These
people might still have died but the feds would have tried to rescue
them.
It's neither Texas nor the Fed's responsibility to station life guards
every 50' along the Rio Grand to rescue stupid illegals.
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
Jan 25, 2024 at 12:27:55 PM PST, Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote: >>BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
And they can come to Chicago to pick up everyone they sent here.
Nope. Y'all talked the sanctuary city talk. Now you have to walk the walk.
That was never my idea. That takes idiotic aldermen and our even more >>idiotic voters.
BIDEN in 2007: Biden was asked if he would allow sanctuary cities to exist. >His answer was NO. He said that sanctuary cities turn into dumps and the >only reason they exist is because the Federal government doesn't enforce >the law.
BIDEN in 2020: Illegals make cities safer and the economy better, and ICE >will be instructed to stop arresting illegals, no more deportations.
https://x.com/mazemoore/status/1750363193933766789?s=20
All this proves is that Biden was kidnapped at some point before he ran
for president and reprogrammed with a new personality, hence the policy change. I thought this was already common knowledge.
Jan 25, 2024 at 12:27:55 PM PST, Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote: >>BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
And they can come to Chicago to pick up everyone they sent here.
Nope. Y'all talked the sanctuary city talk. Now you have to walk the walk.
That was never my idea. That takes idiotic aldermen and our even more >>idiotic voters.
BIDEN in 2007: Biden was asked if he would allow sanctuary cities to exist. >His answer was NO. He said that sanctuary cities turn into dumps and the only >reason they exist is because the Federal government doesn't enforce the law.
BIDEN in 2020: Illegals make cities safer and the economy better, and ICE will >be instructed to stop arresting illegals, no more deportations.
https://x.com/mazemoore/status/1750363193933766789?s=20
On Jan 25, 2024 at 12:27:55 PM PST, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:That was never my idea. That takes idiotic aldermen and our even more
And they can come to Chicago to pick up everyone they sent here.
Nope. Y'all talked the sanctuary city talk. Now you have to walk the walk. >>
idiotic voters.
BIDEN in 2007: Biden was asked if he would allow sanctuary cities to exist. His answer was NO. He said that sanctuary cities turn into dumps and the only reason they exist is because the Federal government doesn't enforce the law.
BIDEN in 2020: Illegals make cities safer and the economy better, and ICE will
be instructed to stop arresting illegals, no more deportations.
https://x.com/mazemoore/status/1750363193933766789?s=20
"Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
Jan 25, 2024 at 12:27:55 PM PST, Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote: >>>>BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
And they can come to Chicago to pick up everyone they sent here.
Nope. Y'all talked the sanctuary city talk. Now you have to walk the walk.
That was never my idea. That takes idiotic aldermen and our even more >>>>idiotic voters.
BIDEN in 2007: Biden was asked if he would allow sanctuary cities to exist. >>>His answer was NO. He said that sanctuary cities turn into dumps and the >>>only reason they exist is because the Federal government doesn't enforce >>>the law.
BIDEN in 2020: Illegals make cities safer and the economy better, and ICE >>>will be instructed to stop arresting illegals, no more deportations.
https://x.com/mazemoore/status/1750363193933766789?s=20
All this proves is that Biden was kidnapped at some point before he ran
for president and reprogrammed with a new personality, hence the policy >>change. I thought this was already common knowledge.
Yes, I believe we're at least two years into a DAVE situation at this
point.
On 1/29/2024 2:23 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Jan 25, 2024 at 12:27:55 PM PST, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
And they can come to Chicago to pick up everyone they sent here.
Nope. Y'all talked the sanctuary city talk. Now you have to walk the
walk.
That was never my idea. That takes idiotic aldermen and our even more
idiotic voters.
BIDEN in 2007: Biden was asked if he would allow sanctuary cities to
exist. His answer was NO. He said that sanctuary cities turn into dumps
and the only reason they exist is because the federal government doesn't enforce the law.
BIDEN in 2020: Illegals make cities safer and the economy better, and
ICE will be instructed to stop arresting illegals, no more deportations.
https://x.com/mazemoore/status/1750363193933766789?s=20
Have you kept all your positions from 15 years ago?
No politician keeps them for 15 months...
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
"Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
Jan 25, 2024 at 12:27:55 PM PST, Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote: >>>>BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
And they can come to Chicago to pick up everyone they sent here.
Nope. Y'all talked the sanctuary city talk. Now you have to walk the >>>>>walk.
That was never my idea. That takes idiotic aldermen and our even more >>>>idiotic voters.
BIDEN in 2007: Biden was asked if he would allow sanctuary cities to >>>exist. His answer was NO. He said that sanctuary cities turn into dumps >>>and the only reason they exist is because the Federal government doesn't >>>enforce the law.
BIDEN in 2020: Illegals make cities safer and the economy better, and ICE >>>will be instructed to stop arresting illegals, no more deportations.
https://x.com/mazemoore/status/1750363193933766789?s=20
All this proves is that Biden was kidnapped at some point before he ran >>for president and reprogrammed with a new personality, hence the policy >>change. I thought this was already common knowledge.
Yes, I believe we're at least two years into a DAVE situation at this >point.
Bill Mitchell disliked his dogs, using them as props for photo ops.
Biden's dogs are completely untrained, suggesting that Biden dislikes
his own dogs. More evidence!
I loved the scene in the movie in which Dave brought in Murray Blum
(Charles Grodin), a CPA, to look at the federal government's books and
he declared everything they're doing to be illegal.
In article <TnUtN.85740$m4d.73404@fx43.iad>, moviePig
<pwallace@moviepig.com> wrote:
On 1/29/2024 2:23 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Jan 25, 2024 at 12:27:55 PM PST, ""Adam H. Kerman""
<ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
And they can come to Chicago to pick up everyone they sent
here.
Nope. Y'all talked the sanctuary city talk. Now you have to
walk the walk.
That was never my idea. That takes idiotic aldermen and our
even more idiotic voters.
BIDEN in 2007: Biden was asked if he would allow sanctuary
cities to exist. His answer was NO. He said that sanctuary cities
turn into dumps and the only reason they exist is because the
federal government doesn't enforce the law.
BIDEN in 2020: Illegals make cities safer and the economy
better, and ICE will be instructed to stop arresting illegals, no
more deportations.
https://x.com/mazemoore/status/1750363193933766789?s=20
Have you kept all your positions from 15 years ago?
On the issue of illegal immigration? Absolutely.
No politician keeps them for 15 months...
So was he lying then or is he lying now?
On 1/29/2024 4:54 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <TnUtN.85740$m4d.73404@fx43.iad>, moviePig <pwallace@moviepig.com> wrote:
On 1/29/2024 2:23 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Jan 25, 2024 at 12:27:55 PM PST, ""Adam H. Kerman""
<ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
And they can come to Chicago to pick up everyone they sent
here.
Nope. Y'all talked the sanctuary city talk. Now you have to
walk the walk.
That was never my idea. That takes idiotic aldermen and our
even more idiotic voters.
BIDEN in 2007: Biden was asked if he would allow sanctuary
cities to exist. His answer was NO. He said that sanctuary cities
turn into dumps and the only reason they exist is because the
federal government doesn't enforce the law.
BIDEN in 2020: Illegals make cities safer and the economy
better, and ICE will be instructed to stop arresting illegals, no
more deportations.
https://x.com/mazemoore/status/1750363193933766789?s=20
Have you kept all your positions from 15 years ago?
On the issue of illegal immigration? Absolutely.
When did you abandon "Give us your tired, your poor...", or did you
never have it?
No politician keeps them for 15 months...
So was he lying then or is he lying now?
Not necessarily ...except perhaps to the extent that all politicians are always lying.
moviePig <pwallace@moviepig.com> wrote:
On 1/29/2024 4:54 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
moviePig <pwallace@moviepig.com> wrote:
On 1/29/2024 2:23 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
Jan 25, 2024 at 12:27:55 PM PST, Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com>: >>>>>>BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
And they can come to Chicago to pick up everyone they sent here.
Nope. Y'all talked the sanctuary city talk. Now you have to
walk the walk.
That was never my idea. That takes idiotic aldermen and our
even more idiotic voters.
BIDEN in 2007: Biden was asked if he would allow sanctuary
cities to exist. His answer was NO. He said that sanctuary cities >>>>>turn into dumps and the only reason they exist is because the
federal government doesn't enforce the law.
BIDEN in 2020: Illegals make cities safer and the economy
better, and ICE will be instructed to stop arresting illegals, no >>>>>more deportations.
https://x.com/mazemoore/status/1750363193933766789?s=20
Have you kept all your positions from 15 years ago?
On the issue of illegal immigration? Absolutely.
When did you abandon "Give us your tired, your poor...", or did you
never have it?
I'm not sure why everyone treats that poem as the fundamental law of the >land. Someone jotted down their own thoughts on the Statue of Liberty
and we're all supposed to adopt them as our own as some kind of national >duty?
As for how I feel about it-- I feel that there's an implied caveat that
says, "As long as they stand in line and complete the legal process for >entry" as people were indeed doing back in the day when the statue was >dedicated and the poem appended to it.
I don't see either that poem (or U.S. tradition or policy) as an
endorsement of the idea of millions of people overrunning our borders en >masse without consequence or that the U.S. is not morally allowed to
have borders at all in the first place.
No politician keeps them for 15 months...
So was he lying then or is he lying now?
Not necessarily ...except perhaps to the extent that all politicians are >>always lying.
Well, he made two contradictory and mutually exclusive assertions of
fact. They were not opinions. So either he was lying or spectacularly >misinformed, neither one of which is a quality one generally looks for
in a president.
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Nope. Y'all talked the sanctuary city talk. Now you have to walk the walk. >>>That was never my idea. That takes idiotic aldermen and our even more >>>idiotic voters.
BIDEN in 2007: Biden was asked if he would allow sanctuary cities to exist. >>His answer was NO. He said that sanctuary cities turn into dumps and the only >>reason they exist is because the Federal government doesn't enforce the law. >>
BIDEN in 2020: Illegals make cities safer and the economy better, and ICE will
be instructed to stop arresting illegals, no more deportations.
https://x.com/mazemoore/status/1750363193933766789?s=20
All this proves is that Biden was kidnapped at some point before he ran
for president and reprogrammed with a new personality, hence the policy >change. I thought this was already common knowledge.
In article <up6e6c$349u$1@dont-email.me>,
Nyssa <Nyssa@LogicalInsight.net> wrote:
BTR1701 wrote:
In article <up5spm$53d$1@dont-email.me>,
Nyssa <Nyssa@LogicalInsight.net> wrote:
anim8rfsk wrote:
Nyssa <Nyssa@LogicalInsight.net> wrote:
anim8rfsk wrote:
Nyssa <Nyssa@LogicalInsight.net> wrote:
BTR1701 wrote:
In article <up3j08$3g4ok$1@dont-email.me>,
Nyssa <Nyssa@LogicalInsight.net> wrote:
anim8rfsk wrote:
Nyssa <Nyssa@LogicalInsight.net> wrote:
I don't have a smartphone, so I cant' test it on
one of those, but that sounds like a job for
anim since all of his devices seem to hate him.
If it'll work for his iPhone/iPad, it should be
good for the rest of the rat-ers.
I hear the siren call of ice cream.
[sigh]
Okay, name your flavor. I'll see if I can flag
down a passing drone to send it your way before
your summer begins next week.
Nyssa, who hasn't got any ice cream on hand at the
moment even for herself
I finished off a tub of blueberry cobbler last
night.
Yeah, just rub it in whydontcha.
I have yet to find any kind of blueberry ice cream
around here...unless I make it myself.
I've got almost three cups of blueberries in the
freezer, so I might have to motivate myself to
making some homemade assuming I can find the heavy
cream for less than an extortionary price. (Which is
unlikely considering the monopolistic grocery chain
we're stuck with here.)
Nyssa, who is hoping that anim's choice of ice cream
is something a bit more easy to find
Häagen-Dazs macadamia nut brittleYou have good taste.
Nyssa, who is still looking for rainbow sherbet
Dozens of varieties available here, including nationalYikes! I tend to stick to making Philadelphia style
brands and store brands and giant tubs of the stuff and
hundred dollar bottles of some sort of compound used in
the making of it.
ice creams that don't use eggs. Although I rarely make
my own anymore due to the inflated price of heavy
cream here. And I certainly use no artificial compounds!
Ick!
I only buy from a limited number of national brands
when they're on sale. Most of the other brands "offered"
in the local chain are what I'd consider off-brands
with lots of artificial gunk added.
Stay away from a brand called Blue Ribbon. It's the
worst I've ever had, so of course the local chain
puts it on sale most often. It ain't worth the price
even on sale. Bleah!
Nyssa, who is somewhat of an ice cream snob and will
not accept the lesser offerings
I go to a local place that makes their stuff by hand. They
have all sorts of unique flavors. Hence my blueberry
cobbler.
Lucky you!
Back in the day when I lived in someplace more civilized
than I currently do, there were a couple of local dairies
that made ice cream in limited amounts.
My favorite flavor from one of those was their Apple
Strudel ice cream. Super yum!
Yeah, my place does apple pie ice cream. I alternate that with the
blueberry.
Ben and Jerry's used to have a Blueberry ice cream that
was a seasonal flavor only available in late summer.
Blue Bell down in Texas did a blueberry for about a year, then
discontinued it forever. :-(
On 1/26/24 4:59 AM, trotsky wrote:
On 1/25/24 10:15 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <250120242150038065%nope@noway.com>,
A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
In article
<2057898242.727907511.390933.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>,
anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
ahk@chinet.com wrote:Well, that link is a nightmare. It says I have to get the different
BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
no_email@invalid.invalid wrote:
The Texas National Guard has defied the SCOTUS ruling andIn a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that Biden can
remove razor wire installed by Texas on the border.
The three liberals on the court were joined by Justices Roberts >>>>>>>>>> and Barrett.
John Roberts is a chameleon and Amy Coney Barrett has become a >>>>>>>>> disappointment who is a Roberts mini-me.
The Biden administration will likely seize Shelby Park from >>>>>>>>>> Texas and remove any border fences that were installed.
(Because the only action Biden actually takes at the border is >>>>>>>>>> to remove any barriers to thousands flooding across. He'd
remove the Rio Grande itself if he could.)
How can there be a "border security deal" with a Biden
Administration that just fought all the way to the Supreme >>>>>>>>>> Court to stop border security?
Why hasn't Biden been impeached for the fourth or fifth time? >>>>>>>>
installed more razor wire and barriers at Shelby Park in Eagle >>>>>>>> Pass, Texas.
The standoff with the TX National Guard is a lose-lose for the >>>>>>>> Biden White House.
Either they send troops down to remove the barriers and wires, >>>>>>>> showing America that they'll physically fight other Americans in >>>>>>>> uniform to make it easier for illegals to get in.
Or they let Texas continue to provide the public with visuals of >>>>>>>> what actual border security and enforcement looks like.
Yeah? It would have been awfully nice if they'd plucked that
drowning woman and children out of the Rio Grande, since they've >>>>>>> taken over patrols and they were separated by the fence. And they >>>>>>> can come to Chicago to pick up everyone they sent here.
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/x492d884eb9o1z9diuqof/SanctuaryHypocrites.j
pg
new
dropbox app to view this. It no longer has the option. "continue in
browser" all I can do is go to the Apple Store. Now I've had Dropbox >>>>> forever and I have a professional account and I have the app so I
don't
know what this thing's problem is but there's no way to look at it.
I get Request Access and You Don't Have Access to This Content.
Stop wasting our time, dude.
Why not stop whining and bitching about me and just killfile me? Then
your precious time will never be bothered by me again, because I'll tell >>> you right now, I couldn't care less about your time and will never be
adjusting my posting habits to accommodate it.
Instead of people "killfiling" (read: filtering) you, why not just
stop shitposting?
Mind telling me what the difference would be? Either way, nobody ever
hears from him again.
On 1/25/24 10:28 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Jan 25, 2024 at 6:27:23 PM PST, "anim8rfsk" <anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
ahk@chinet.com wrote:
BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:Yeah? It would have been awfully nice if they'd plucked that
no_email@invalid.invalid wrote:The Texas National Guard has defied the SCOTUS ruling and
In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that Biden canJohn Roberts is a chameleon and Amy Coney Barrett has become a >>>>>>> disappointment
remove razor wire
installed by Texas on the border.
The three liberals on the court were joined by Justices
Roberts and Barrett.
who is a Roberts mini-me.
The Biden administration will likely seize Shelby Park from >>>>>>>> Texas andWhy hasn't Biden been impeached for the fourth or fifth time?
remove any border fences that were installed. (Because the
only action
Biden actually takes at the border is to remove any barriers >>>>>>>> to thousands
flooding across. He'd remove the Rio Grande itself if he could.) >>>>>>>> How can there be a "border security deal" with a Biden
Administration that
just fought all the way to the Supreme Court to stop border >>>>>>>> security?
installed more
razor wire and barriers at Shelby Park in Eagle Pass, Texas.
The standoff with the TX National Guard is a lose-lose for the
Biden White
House.
Either they send troops down to remove the barriers and wires,
showing
America that they'll physically fight other Americans in uniform >>>>>> to make it
easier for illegals to get in.
Or they let Texas continue to provide the public with visuals of >>>>>> what
actual border security and enforcement looks like.
drowning
woman and children out of the Rio Grande, since they've taken over >>>>> patrols and they were separated by the fence. And they can come to >>>>> Chicago to pick up everyone they sent here.
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/x492d884eb9o1z9diuqof/SanctuaryHypocrites.jpg
Well, that link is a nightmare. It says I have to get the different new
dropbox app to view this. It no longer has the option. “continue in
browser“ all I can do is go to the Apple Store. Now I’ve had Dropbox >>> forever and I have a professional account and I have the app so I don’t >>> know what this thing‘s problem is but there’s no way to look at it.
I think this is just another front in the war technology is waging
against
you.
None of the people I've sent that to have had any problem viewing it
in their
browsers.
Nope. Dropbox wants you to login to an account now. As such, their limited usage is getting even more limited.
Sharing files will only be between Dropbox users, and then only if you
want to leave your info behind.
On Jan 25, 2024 at 3:25:01 PM PST, "Ed Stasiak" <edstasiak1067@gmail.com> wrote:
Adam H. Kerman
Texas wasn't there and they kept the federal government out. These
people might still have died but the feds would have tried to rescue
them.
It's neither Texas nor the Fed's responsibility to station life guards
every 50' along the Rio Grand to rescue stupid illegals.
Democrats at the Southern Border if the hordes of illegals would vote Republican once they got in:
https://x.com/AmiriKing/status/1747600601729380712?s=20
On Jan 25, 2024 at 12:27:55 PM PST, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:That was never my idea. That takes idiotic aldermen and our even more
And they can come to Chicago to pick up everyone they sent here.
Nope. Y'all talked the sanctuary city talk. Now you have to walk the walk. >>
idiotic voters.
BIDEN in 2007: Biden was asked if he would allow sanctuary cities to exist. His answer was NO. He said that sanctuary cities turn into dumps and the only reason they exist is because the Federal government doesn't enforce the law.
BIDEN in 2020: Illegals make cities safer and the economy better, and ICE will
be instructed to stop arresting illegals, no more deportations.
https://x.com/mazemoore/status/1750363193933766789?s=20
In article <up8vup$jgmu$3@dont-email.me>,
"Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
Jan 25, 2024 at 12:27:55 PM PST, Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote: >>>> BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
And they can come to Chicago to pick up everyone they sent here.
Nope. Y'all talked the sanctuary city talk. Now you have to walk the walk.
That was never my idea. That takes idiotic aldermen and our even more
idiotic voters.
BIDEN in 2007: Biden was asked if he would allow sanctuary cities to exist. >>> His answer was NO. He said that sanctuary cities turn into dumps and the >>> only reason they exist is because the Federal government doesn't enforce >>> the law.
BIDEN in 2020: Illegals make cities safer and the economy better, and ICE >>> will be instructed to stop arresting illegals, no more deportations.
https://x.com/mazemoore/status/1750363193933766789?s=20
All this proves is that Biden was kidnapped at some point before he ran
for president and reprogrammed with a new personality, hence the policy
change. I thought this was already common knowledge.
Yes, I believe we're at least two years into a DAVE situation at this
point.
In article <TnUtN.85740$m4d.73404@fx43.iad>,
moviePig <pwallace@moviepig.com> wrote:
On 1/29/2024 2:23 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Jan 25, 2024 at 12:27:55 PM PST, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com>
wrote:
BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
And they can come to Chicago to pick up everyone they sent here.
Nope. Y'all talked the sanctuary city talk. Now you have to walk the >>>>> walk.
That was never my idea. That takes idiotic aldermen and our even more
idiotic voters.
BIDEN in 2007: Biden was asked if he would allow sanctuary cities to
exist. His answer was NO. He said that sanctuary cities turn into dumps
and the only reason they exist is because the federal government doesn't >>> enforce the law.
BIDEN in 2020: Illegals make cities safer and the economy better, and
ICE will be instructed to stop arresting illegals, no more deportations. >>>
https://x.com/mazemoore/status/1750363193933766789?s=20
Have you kept all your positions from 15 years ago?
On the issue of illegal immigration? Absolutely.
No politician keeps them for 15 months...
So was he lying then or is he lying now?
On Jan 25, 2024 at 1:30:46 AM PST, "Ubiquitous" <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
no_email@invalid.invalid wrote:
In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that Biden can remove razor wire
installed by Texas on the border.
The three liberals on the court were joined by Justices Roberts and Barrett.
John Roberts is a chameleon and Amy Coney Barrett has become a disappointment
who
is a Roberts mini-me.
The Biden administration will likely seize Shelby Park from Texas and
remove any border fences that were installed. (Because the only action >>> Biden actually takes at the border is to remove any barriers to thousands >>> flooding across. He'd remove the Rio Grande itself if he could.)
How can there be a "border security deal" with a Biden Administration that
just fought all the way to the Supreme Court to stop border security?
Why hasn't Biden been impeached for the fourth or fifth time?
Isn't it interesting that the Left
the world in its quest for a separate state (Palestine, Northern Ireland, Donetsk, Tibet) yet they have fits of outrage any time a U.S. state like Texas
asserts even the smallest amount of autonomy in its own self-interest.
In article <pUVtN.55480$5Hnd.33297@fx03.iad>,
moviePig <pwallace@moviepig.com> wrote:
On 1/29/2024 4:54 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <TnUtN.85740$m4d.73404@fx43.iad>, moviePig
<pwallace@moviepig.com> wrote:
On 1/29/2024 2:23 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Jan 25, 2024 at 12:27:55 PM PST, ""Adam H. Kerman""
<ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
And they can come to Chicago to pick up everyone they sent
here.
Nope. Y'all talked the sanctuary city talk. Now you have to
walk the walk.
That was never my idea. That takes idiotic aldermen and our
even more idiotic voters.
BIDEN in 2007: Biden was asked if he would allow sanctuary
cities to exist. His answer was NO. He said that sanctuary cities
turn into dumps and the only reason they exist is because the
federal government doesn't enforce the law.
BIDEN in 2020: Illegals make cities safer and the economy
better, and ICE will be instructed to stop arresting illegals, no
more deportations.
https://x.com/mazemoore/status/1750363193933766789?s=20
Have you kept all your positions from 15 years ago?
On the issue of illegal immigration? Absolutely.
When did you abandon "Give us your tired, your poor...", or did you
never have it?
I'm not sure why everyone treats that poem
land. Someone jotted down their own thoughts on the Statue of Liberty
and we're all supposed to adopt them as our own as some kind of national duty?
As for how I feel about it-- I feel that there's an implied caveat that
says, "As long as they stand in line and complete the legal process for entry" as people were indeed doing back in the day when the statue was dedicated and the poem appended to it.
I don't see either that poem (or U.S. tradition or policy) as an
endorsement of the idea of millions of people overrunning our borders en masse without consequence or that the U.S. is not morally allowed to
have borders at all in the first place.
No politician keeps them for 15 months...
So was he lying then or is he lying now?
Not necessarily ...except perhaps to the extent that all politicians are
always lying.
Well, he made two contradictory and mutually exclusive assertions of
fact. They were not opinions. So either he was lying or spectacularly misinformed, neither one of which is a quality one generally looks for
in a president.
On 1/29/24 5:37 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <pUVtN.55480$5Hnd.33297@fx03.iad>,
moviePig <pwallace@moviepig.com> wrote:
On 1/29/2024 4:54 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <TnUtN.85740$m4d.73404@fx43.iad>, moviePig
<pwallace@moviepig.com> wrote:
On 1/29/2024 2:23 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Jan 25, 2024 at 12:27:55 PM PST, ""Adam H. Kerman""
<ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
And they can come to Chicago to pick up everyone they sent
here.
Nope. Y'all talked the sanctuary city talk. Now you have to
walk the walk.
That was never my idea. That takes idiotic aldermen and our
even more idiotic voters.
BIDEN in 2007: Biden was asked if he would allow sanctuary
cities to exist. His answer was NO. He said that sanctuary cities
turn into dumps and the only reason they exist is because the
federal government doesn't enforce the law.
BIDEN in 2020: Illegals make cities safer and the economy
better, and ICE will be instructed to stop arresting illegals, no
more deportations.
https://x.com/mazemoore/status/1750363193933766789?s=20
Have you kept all your positions from 15 years ago?
On the issue of illegal immigration? Absolutely.
When did you abandon "Give us your tired, your poor...", or did you
never have it?
I'm not sure why everyone treats that poem
It's an inscription, not a poem. Are you really an American?
On 1/29/24 1:25 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Jan 25, 2024 at 3:25:01 PM PST, "Ed Stasiak" <edstasiak1067@gmail.com> wrote:
Adam H. Kerman
Texas wasn't there and they kept the federal government out. These
people might still have died but the feds would have tried to rescue >>> them.
It's neither Texas nor the Fed's responsibility to station life guards
every 50' along the Rio Grand to rescue stupid illegals.
Democrats at the Southern Border if the hordes of illegals would vote Republican once they got in:
https://x.com/AmiriKing/status/1747600601729380712?s=20
So, again, does this mean you're ridin' Trump train instead of ridin'
with Biden?
Instead of people "killfiling" (read: filtering) you, why not just stop
shitposting?
Mind telling me what the difference would be? Either way, nobody ever
hears from him again.
I still find myself craving Ben & Jerry's "Pulp Addiction".
Milk Chocolate, swirled with Orange Creamsicle and a vein of Orange Liqueur.
On 1/31/24 5:37 AM, trotsky wrote:
On 1/29/24 1:23 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Jan 25, 2024 at 12:27:55 PM PST, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com>
wrote:
BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
And they can come to Chicago to pick up everyone they sent here.
Nope. Y'all talked the sanctuary city talk. Now you have to walk
the walk.
That was never my idea. That takes idiotic aldermen and our even more
idiotic voters.
BIDEN in 2007: Biden was asked if he would allow sanctuary cities to
exist.
His answer was NO. He said that sanctuary cities turn into dumps and
the only
reason they exist is because the Federal government doesn't enforce
the law.
BIDEN in 2020: Illegals make cities safer and the economy better, and
ICE will
be instructed to stop arresting illegals, no more deportations.
https://x.com/mazemoore/status/1750363193933766789?s=20
Wow that sounds heinous. So you're voting for Trump then? Go ahead,
complete the lie.
Of course he is! Liar, fraud, insurrectionist, misogynist, dictator,
con man, rapist... what's Thanny NOT to vote for?
He's his dream candidate.
On 1/31/24 6:03 AM, FPP wrote:
On 1/31/24 5:37 AM, trotsky wrote:
On 1/29/24 1:23 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Jan 25, 2024 at 12:27:55 PM PST, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> >>>> wrote:
BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
And they can come to Chicago to pick up everyone they sent here.
Nope. Y'all talked the sanctuary city talk. Now you have to walk
the walk.
That was never my idea. That takes idiotic aldermen and our even more >>>>> idiotic voters.
BIDEN in 2007: Biden was asked if he would allow sanctuary cities to
exist. His answer was NO. He said that sanctuary cities turn into dumps and
the only reason they exist is because the Federal government doesn't
enforce
the law.
BIDEN in 2020: Illegals make cities safer and the economy better, and >>>> ICE will be instructed to stop arresting illegals, no more deportations. >>>>
https://x.com/mazemoore/status/1750363193933766789?s=20
Wow that sounds heinous. So you're voting for Trump then? Go ahead, >>> complete the lie.
Of course he is! Liar, fraud, insurrectionist, misogynist, dictator,
con man, rapist... what's Thanny NOT to vote for?
He's his dream candidate.
Even more than that, in Twat's case he's a wet dream candidate. He's
ruined a lot of adult diapers that way. A lot of people are saying that.
moviePig <pwallace@moviepig.com> wrote:
On 1/29/2024 4:54 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
moviePig <pwallace@moviepig.com> wrote:
On 1/29/2024 2:23 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
BIDEN in 2007: Biden was asked if he would allow sanctuary
cities to exist. His answer was NO. He said that sanctuary cities
turn into dumps and the only reason they exist is because the
federal government doesn't enforce the law.
BIDEN in 2020: Illegals make cities safer and the economy
better, and ICE will be instructed to stop arresting illegals, no
more deportations.
https://x.com/mazemoore/status/1750363193933766789?s=20
Have you kept all your positions from 15 years ago?
On the issue of illegal immigration? Absolutely.
When did you abandon "Give us your tired, your poor...", or did you
never have it?
I'm not sure why everyone treats that poem as the fundamental law of the >land. Someone jotted down their own thoughts on the Statue of Liberty
and we're all supposed to adopt them as our own as some kind of national >duty?
As for how I feel about it-- I feel that there's an implied caveat that
says, "As long as they stand in line and complete the legal process for >entry" as people were indeed doing back in the day when the statue was >dedicated and the poem appended to it.
I don't see either that poem (or U.S. tradition or policy) as an
endorsement of the idea of millions of people overrunning our borders en >masse without consequence or that the U.S. is not morally allowed to
have borders at all in the first place.
On 2/1/24 12:24 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
No response here, Hutt? Your flapping jowls always have so much to say but here you're silent...
ME: I'm not sure why everyone treats that poem
HUTT: It's an inscription, not a poem. Are you really an American?
ME: "The New Colossus" is a sonnet by American POET Emma Lazarus. She wrote the POEM in 1883 to raise money for the construction of the pedestal for the Statue of Liberty.
In 1903, the POEM was cast onto a bronze plaque and mounted inside the pedestal's lower level.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_Colossus
Are YOU really an American, Hutt?
Dummy has it wrong again. Because he still doesn't understand that
words have meanings... and he's a functional illiterate.
in·scrip·tion > /in?skripSH(?)n/
noun: inscription; plural noun: inscriptions
words inscribed, as on a monument or in a book.
It may also be a poem, but it's ABSOLUTELY an inscription.
On 1/31/24 2:27 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <JtpuN.377128$p%Mb.365614@fx15.iad>,
trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
On 1/29/24 5:37 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <pUVtN.55480$5Hnd.33297@fx03.iad>,
moviePig <pwallace@moviepig.com> wrote:
On 1/29/2024 4:54 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <TnUtN.85740$m4d.73404@fx43.iad>, moviePig
<pwallace@moviepig.com> wrote:
On 1/29/2024 2:23 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Jan 25, 2024 at 12:27:55 PM PST, ""Adam H. Kerman""
<ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
And they can come to Chicago to pick up everyone they sent >>>>>>>>>> here.
Nope. Y'all talked the sanctuary city talk. Now you have to >>>>>>>>> walk the walk.
That was never my idea. That takes idiotic aldermen and our
even more idiotic voters.
BIDEN in 2007: Biden was asked if he would allow sanctuary
cities to exist. His answer was NO. He said that sanctuary cities >>>>>>> turn into dumps and the only reason they exist is because the
federal government doesn't enforce the law.
BIDEN in 2020: Illegals make cities safer and the economy
better, and ICE will be instructed to stop arresting illegals, no >>>>>>> more deportations.
https://x.com/mazemoore/status/1750363193933766789?s=20
Have you kept all your positions from 15 years ago?
On the issue of illegal immigration? Absolutely.
When did you abandon "Give us your tired, your poor...", or did you
never have it?
I'm not sure why everyone treats that poem
It's an inscription, not a poem. Are you really an American?
"The New Colossus" is a sonnet by American poet Emma Lazarus. She wrote
the POEM in 1883 to raise money for the construction of the pedestal for the Statue of Liberty.
In 1903, the POEM was cast onto a bronze plaque and mounted inside the pedestal's lower level.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_Colossus
Are YOU really an American, Hutt?
It's an inscription. Of a poem. Try getting something right.
On 2/1/24 12:24 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Feb 1, 2024 at 3:21:57 AM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
On 1/31/24 6:03 AM, FPP wrote:
On 1/31/24 5:37 AM, trotsky wrote:
On 1/29/24 1:23 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Jan 25, 2024 at 12:27:55 PM PST, ""Adam H. Kerman""
<ahk@chinet.com>
wrote:
BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
And they can come to Chicago to pick up everyone they sent here. >>>>>>>Nope. Y'all talked the sanctuary city talk. Now you have to walk >>>>>>>> the walk.
That was never my idea. That takes idiotic aldermen and our
even more
idiotic voters.
BIDEN in 2007: Biden was asked if he would allow sanctuary
cities to
exist. His answer was NO. He said that sanctuary cities turn
into dumps and
the only reason they exist is because the Federal government
doesn't
enforce
the law.
BIDEN in 2020: Illegals make cities safer and the economy
better, and
ICE will be instructed to stop arresting illegals, no more
deportations.
https://x.com/mazemoore/status/1750363193933766789?s=20
Wow that sounds heinous. So you're voting for Trump then? Go
ahead,
complete the lie.
Of course he is! Liar, fraud, insurrectionist, misogynist, dictator, >>>> con man, rapist... what's Thanny NOT to vote for?
He's his dream candidate.
Even more than that, in Twat's case he's a wet dream candidate. He's
ruined a lot of adult diapers that way. A lot of people are saying
that.
No response here, Hutt? Your flapping jowls always have so much to say
but
here you're silent...
ME: I'm not sure why everyone treats that poem
HUTT: It's an inscription, not a poem. Are you really an American?
ME: "The New Colossus" is a sonnet by American POET Emma Lazarus. She
wrote
the POEM in 1883 to raise money for the construction of the pedestal
for the
Statue of Liberty.
In 1903, the POEM was cast onto a bronze plaque and mounted inside the
pedestal's lower level.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_Colossus
Are YOU really an American, Hutt?
Dummy has it wrong again. Because he still doesn't understand that
words have meanings... and he's a functional illiterate.
in·scrip·tion > /inˈskripSH(ə)n/
noun: inscription; plural noun: inscriptions
words inscribed, as on a monument or in a book.
It may also be a poem, but it's ABSOLUTELY an inscription.
On 1/31/24 2:30 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <LqpuN.377125$p%Mb.242367@fx15.iad>,
trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
On 1/29/24 1:25 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Jan 25, 2024 at 3:25:01 PM PST, "Ed Stasiak"
<edstasiak1067@gmail.com>
wrote:
Adam H. Kerman
Texas wasn't there and they kept the federal government out. These >>>>>> people might still have died but the feds would have tried to >>>>>> rescue
them.
It's neither Texas nor the Fed's responsibility to station life guards >>>>> every 50' along the Rio Grand to rescue stupid illegals.
Democrats at the Southern Border if the hordes of illegals would vote
Republican once they got in:
https://x.com/AmiriKing/status/1747600601729380712?s=20
So, again, does this mean you're ridin' Trump train instead of ridin'
with Biden?
I'm pretty sure I was fairly clear in an earlier thread in which both
you and Effa participated when I said I won't be voting for either of
these two appalling candidates. I will vote for the state and local and
congressional races but I won't vote for president.
Did you get it this time, you smelly behemoth, or do you need me to use
words with less syllables?
Yeah, he's voting for Trump.
On 2/1/24 11:24 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
No response here, Hutt? Your flapping jowls always have so much to say but here you're silent...
ME: I'm not sure why everyone treats that poem
HUTT: It's an inscription, not a poem. Are you really an American?
ME: "The New Colossus" is a sonnet by American POET Emma Lazarus. She wrote the POEM in 1883 to raise money for the construction of the pedestal for the Statue of Liberty.
In 1903, the POEM was cast onto a bronze plaque and mounted inside the pedestal's lower level.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_Colossus
Are YOU really an American, Hutt?
It's a poem inscribed on a statue, what the fuck else do you need to
know?
On Feb 1, 2024 at 3:21:57 AM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
On 1/31/24 6:03 AM, FPP wrote:
On 1/31/24 5:37 AM, trotsky wrote:
On 1/29/24 1:23 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Jan 25, 2024 at 12:27:55 PM PST, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> >>>>> wrote:
BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
And they can come to Chicago to pick up everyone they sent here. >>>>>>Nope. Y'all talked the sanctuary city talk. Now you have to walk >>>>>>> the walk.
That was never my idea. That takes idiotic aldermen and our even more >>>>>> idiotic voters.
BIDEN in 2007: Biden was asked if he would allow sanctuary cities to >>>>> exist. His answer was NO. He said that sanctuary cities turn into dumps and
the only reason they exist is because the Federal government doesn't >>>>> enforce
the law.
BIDEN in 2020: Illegals make cities safer and the economy better, and >>>>> ICE will be instructed to stop arresting illegals, no more deportations.
https://x.com/mazemoore/status/1750363193933766789?s=20
Wow that sounds heinous. So you're voting for Trump then? Go ahead, >>>> complete the lie.
Of course he is! Liar, fraud, insurrectionist, misogynist, dictator, >>> con man, rapist... what's Thanny NOT to vote for?
He's his dream candidate.
Even more than that, in Twat's case he's a wet dream candidate. He's
ruined a lot of adult diapers that way. A lot of people are saying that.
No response here, Hutt? Your flapping jowls always have so much to say but here you're silent...
ME: I'm not sure why everyone treats that poem
HUTT: It's an inscription, not a poem. Are you really an American?
ME: "The New Colossus" is a sonnet by American POET Emma Lazarus. She wrote the POEM in 1883 to raise money for the construction of the pedestal for the Statue of Liberty.
In 1903, the POEM was cast onto a bronze plaque and mounted inside the pedestal's lower level.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_Colossus
Are YOU really an American, Hutt?
On 2/1/24 12:24 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Feb 1, 2024 at 3:21:57 AM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
On 1/31/24 6:03 AM, FPP wrote:
On 1/31/24 5:37 AM, trotsky wrote:
On 1/29/24 1:23 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Jan 25, 2024 at 12:27:55 PM PST, ""Adam H. Kerman""
<ahk@chinet.com>
wrote:
BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
And they can come to Chicago to pick up everyone they sent here. >>>>>>>Nope. Y'all talked the sanctuary city talk. Now you have to walk >>>>>>>> the walk.
That was never my idea. That takes idiotic aldermen and our
even more
idiotic voters.
BIDEN in 2007: Biden was asked if he would allow sanctuary
cities to
exist. His answer was NO. He said that sanctuary cities turn
into dumps and
the only reason they exist is because the Federal government
doesn't
enforce
the law.
BIDEN in 2020: Illegals make cities safer and the economy
better, and
ICE will be instructed to stop arresting illegals, no more
deportations.
https://x.com/mazemoore/status/1750363193933766789?s=20
Wow that sounds heinous. So you're voting for Trump then? Go
ahead,
complete the lie.
Of course he is! Liar, fraud, insurrectionist, misogynist, dictator, >>>> con man, rapist... what's Thanny NOT to vote for?
He's his dream candidate.
Even more than that, in Twat's case he's a wet dream candidate. He's
ruined a lot of adult diapers that way. A lot of people are saying
that.
No response here, Hutt? Your flapping jowls always have so much to say
but
here you're silent...
ME: I'm not sure why everyone treats that poem
HUTT: It's an inscription, not a poem. Are you really an American?
ME: "The New Colossus" is a sonnet by American POET Emma Lazarus. She
wrote
the POEM in 1883 to raise money for the construction of the pedestal
for the
Statue of Liberty.
In 1903, the POEM was cast onto a bronze plaque and mounted inside the
pedestal's lower level.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_Colossus
Are YOU really an American, Hutt?
Dummy has it wrong again. Because he still doesn't understand that
words have meanings... and he's a functional illiterate.
in·scrip·tion > /inˈskripSH(ə)n/
noun: inscription; plural noun: inscriptions
words inscribed, as on a monument or in a book.
It may also be a poem, but it's ABSOLUTELY an inscription.
On 1/31/24 2:30 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <LqpuN.377125$p%Mb.242367@fx15.iad>,
trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
On 1/29/24 1:25 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Jan 25, 2024 at 3:25:01 PM PST, "Ed Stasiak"
<edstasiak1067@gmail.com>
wrote:
Adam H. Kerman
Texas wasn't there and they kept the federal government out. These >>>>>> people might still have died but the feds would have tried to >>>>>> rescue
them.
It's neither Texas nor the Fed's responsibility to station life guards >>>>> every 50' along the Rio Grand to rescue stupid illegals.
Democrats at the Southern Border if the hordes of illegals would vote
Republican once they got in:
https://x.com/AmiriKing/status/1747600601729380712?s=20
So, again, does this mean you're ridin' Trump train instead of ridin'
with Biden?
I'm pretty sure I was fairly clear in an earlier thread in which both
you and Effa participated when I said I won't be voting for either of
these two appalling candidates. I will vote for the state and local and
congressional races but I won't vote for president.
Did you get it this time, you smelly behemoth, or do you need me to use
words with less syllables?
Yeah, he's voting for Trump.
In article <upisos$2kj3u$3@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 1/31/24 2:27 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <JtpuN.377128$p%Mb.365614@fx15.iad>,It's an inscription. Of a poem. Try getting something right.
trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
On 1/29/24 5:37 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <pUVtN.55480$5Hnd.33297@fx03.iad>,
moviePig <pwallace@moviepig.com> wrote:
On 1/29/2024 4:54 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <TnUtN.85740$m4d.73404@fx43.iad>, moviePig
<pwallace@moviepig.com> wrote:
On 1/29/2024 2:23 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Jan 25, 2024 at 12:27:55 PM PST, ""Adam H. Kerman""
<ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
And they can come to Chicago to pick up everyone they sent >>>>>>>>>>>> here.
Nope. Y'all talked the sanctuary city talk. Now you have to >>>>>>>>>>> walk the walk.
That was never my idea. That takes idiotic aldermen and our >>>>>>>>>> even more idiotic voters.
BIDEN in 2007: Biden was asked if he would allow sanctuary
cities to exist. His answer was NO. He said that sanctuary cities >>>>>>>>> turn into dumps and the only reason they exist is because the >>>>>>>>> federal government doesn't enforce the law.
BIDEN in 2020: Illegals make cities safer and the economy
better, and ICE will be instructed to stop arresting illegals, no >>>>>>>>> more deportations.
https://x.com/mazemoore/status/1750363193933766789?s=20
Have you kept all your positions from 15 years ago?
On the issue of illegal immigration? Absolutely.
When did you abandon "Give us your tired, your poor...", or did you >>>>>> never have it?
I'm not sure why everyone treats that poem
It's an inscription, not a poem. Are you really an American?
"The New Colossus" is a sonnet by American poet Emma Lazarus. She wrote
the POEM in 1883 to raise money for the construction of the pedestal for >>> the Statue of Liberty.
In 1903, the POEM was cast onto a bronze plaque and mounted inside the
pedestal's lower level.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_Colossus
Are YOU really an American, Hutt?
Hutt said it's NOT a poem. That's what is being addressed here.
In article <6svvN.287659$q3F7.75911@fx45.iad>,
trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
On 2/1/24 11:24 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
No response here, Hutt? Your flapping jowls always have so much to say but >>> here you're silent...
ME: I'm not sure why everyone treats that poem
HUTT: It's an inscription, not a poem. Are you really an American?
ME: "The New Colossus" is a sonnet by American POET Emma Lazarus. She wrote >>> the POEM in 1883 to raise money for the construction of the pedestal for >>> the Statue of Liberty.
In 1903, the POEM was cast onto a bronze plaque and mounted inside the
pedestal's lower level.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_Colossus
Are YOU really an American, Hutt?
It's a poem inscribed on a statue, what the fuck else do you need to
know?
So when you said, "It's an inscription, not a poem", that meant what?
On Feb 1, 2024 at 3:21:57 AM PST, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
On 1/31/24 6:03 AM, FPP wrote:
On 1/31/24 5:37 AM, trotsky wrote:
On 1/29/24 1:23 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Jan 25, 2024 at 12:27:55 PM PST, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> >>>>> wrote:
BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
And they can come to Chicago to pick up everyone they sent here. >>>>>>Nope. Y'all talked the sanctuary city talk. Now you have to walk >>>>>>> the walk.
That was never my idea. That takes idiotic aldermen and our even more >>>>>> idiotic voters.
BIDEN in 2007: Biden was asked if he would allow sanctuary cities to >>>>> exist. His answer was NO. He said that sanctuary cities turn into dumps and
the only reason they exist is because the Federal government doesn't >>>>> enforce
the law.
BIDEN in 2020: Illegals make cities safer and the economy better, and >>>>> ICE will be instructed to stop arresting illegals, no more deportations.
https://x.com/mazemoore/status/1750363193933766789?s=20
Wow that sounds heinous. So you're voting for Trump then? Go ahead, >>>> complete the lie.
Of course he is! Liar, fraud, insurrectionist, misogynist, dictator, >>> con man, rapist... what's Thanny NOT to vote for?
He's his dream candidate.
Even more than that, in Twat's case he's a wet dream candidate. He's
ruined a lot of adult diapers that way. A lot of people are saying that.
No response here, Hutt? Your flapping jowls always have so much to say but here you're silent...
ME: I'm not sure why everyone treats that poem
HUTT: It's an inscription, not a poem. Are you really an American?
ME: "The New Colossus" is a sonnet by American POET Emma Lazarus. She wrote the POEM in 1883 to raise money for the construction of the pedestal for the Statue of Liberty.
In 1903, the POEM was cast onto a bronze plaque and mounted inside the pedestal's lower level.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_Colossus
Are YOU really an American, Hutt?
On 1/29/2024 4:54 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <TnUtN.85740$m4d.73404@fx43.iad>, moviePig
<pwallace@moviepig.com> wrote:
On 1/29/2024 2:23 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Jan 25, 2024 at 12:27:55 PM PST, ""Adam H. Kerman""
<ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
And they can come to Chicago to pick up everyone they sent here.
Nope. Y'all talked the sanctuary city talk. Now you have to walk
the walk.
That was never my idea. That takes idiotic aldermen and our even
more idiotic voters.
BIDEN in 2007: Biden was asked if he would allow sanctuary
cities to exist. His answer was NO. He said that sanctuary cities
turn into dumps and the only reason they exist is because the
federal government doesn't enforce the law.
BIDEN in 2020: Illegals make cities safer and the economy
better, and ICE will be instructed to stop arresting illegals, no
more deportations.
https://x.com/mazemoore/status/1750363193933766789?s=20
Have you kept all your positions from 15 years ago?
On the issue of illegal immigration? Absolutely.
When did you abandon "Give us your tired, your poor...", or did you
never have it?
...
On 2/3/24 12:33 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <6svvN.287659$q3F7.75911@fx45.iad>,
trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
On 2/1/24 11:24 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
No response here, Hutt? Your flapping jowls always have so much to say >>> but here you're silent...
ME: I'm not sure why everyone treats that poem
HUTT: It's an inscription, not a poem. Are you really an American?
ME: "The New Colossus" is a sonnet by American POET Emma Lazarus. She
wrote the POEM in 1883 to raise money for the construction of the
pedestal for the Statue of Liberty.
In 1903, the POEM was cast onto a bronze plaque and mounted inside the >>> pedestal's lower level.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_Colossus
Are YOU really an American, Hutt?
It's a poem inscribed on a statue, what the fuck else do you need to
know?
So when you said, "It's an inscription, not a poem", that meant what?
It meant an inscription is something you read on a statue and a poem is recited or printed in a book.
In article <6svvN.287659$q3F7.75911@fx45.iad>,
trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
On 2/1/24 11:24 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
No response here, Hutt? Your flapping jowls always have so much to say but >>> here you're silent...
ME: I'm not sure why everyone treats that poem
HUTT: It's an inscription, not a poem. Are you really an American?
ME: "The New Colossus" is a sonnet by American POET Emma Lazarus. She wrote >>> the POEM in 1883 to raise money for the construction of the pedestal for >>> the Statue of Liberty.
In 1903, the POEM was cast onto a bronze plaque and mounted inside the
pedestal's lower level.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_Colossus
Are YOU really an American, Hutt?
It's a poem inscribed on a statue, what the fuck else do you need to
know?
So when you said, "It's an inscription, not a poem", that meant what?
In article <17b0a1e3ad5c4bc1$1518$2154774$cad58068@news.newsdemon.com>,
trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
On 2/3/24 12:33 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <6svvN.287659$q3F7.75911@fx45.iad>,
trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
On 2/1/24 11:24 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
No response here, Hutt? Your flapping jowls always have so much to say >>>>> but here you're silent...
ME: I'm not sure why everyone treats that poem
HUTT: It's an inscription, not a poem. Are you really an American?
ME: "The New Colossus" is a sonnet by American POET Emma Lazarus. She >>>>> wrote the POEM in 1883 to raise money for the construction of the
pedestal for the Statue of Liberty.
In 1903, the POEM was cast onto a bronze plaque and mounted inside the >>>>> pedestal's lower level.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_Colossus
Are YOU really an American, Hutt?
It's a poem inscribed on a statue, what the fuck else do you need to
know?
So when you said, "It's an inscription, not a poem", that meant what?
It meant an inscription is something you read on a statue and a poem is
recited or printed in a book.
So "[It's] not a poem" means it's in a book?
Do you know how language works, Hutt?
On 2/4/24 1:39 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <17b0a1e3ad5c4bc1$1518$2154774$cad58068@news.newsdemon.com>,
trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
On 2/3/24 12:33 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <6svvN.287659$q3F7.75911@fx45.iad>,
trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
On 2/1/24 11:24 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
No response here, Hutt? Your flapping jowls always have so much to say >>>>>> but here you're silent...
ME: I'm not sure why everyone treats that poem
HUTT: It's an inscription, not a poem. Are you really an American? >>>>>>
ME: "The New Colossus" is a sonnet by American POET Emma Lazarus. She >>>>>> wrote the POEM in 1883 to raise money for the construction of the
pedestal for the Statue of Liberty.
In 1903, the POEM was cast onto a bronze plaque and mounted inside the >>>>>> pedestal's lower level.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_Colossus
Are YOU really an American, Hutt?
It's a poem inscribed on a statue, what the fuck else do you need to >>>>> know?
So when you said, "It's an inscription, not a poem", that meant what?
It meant an inscription is something you read on a statue and a poem is
recited or printed in a book.
So "[It's] not a poem" means it's in a book?
Do you know how language works, Hutt?
I do. You don't. Something can be two or more things simultaneously.
trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
On 2/4/24 1:39 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <17b0a1e3ad5c4bc1$1518$2154774$cad58068@news.newsdemon.com>,
trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
On 2/3/24 12:33 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <6svvN.287659$q3F7.75911@fx45.iad>,It meant an inscription is something you read on a statue and a poem is >>>> recited or printed in a book.
trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
On 2/1/24 11:24 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
No response here, Hutt? Your flapping jowls always have so much to say >>>>>>> but here you're silent...
ME: I'm not sure why everyone treats that poem
HUTT: It's an inscription, not a poem. Are you really an American? >>>>>>>
ME: "The New Colossus" is a sonnet by American POET Emma Lazarus. She >>>>>>> wrote the POEM in 1883 to raise money for the construction of the >>>>>>> pedestal for the Statue of Liberty.
In 1903, the POEM was cast onto a bronze plaque and mounted inside the >>>>>>> pedestal's lower level.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_Colossus
Are YOU really an American, Hutt?
It's a poem inscribed on a statue, what the fuck else do you need to >>>>>> know?
So when you said, "It's an inscription, not a poem", that meant what? >>>>
So "[It's] not a poem" means it's in a book?
Do you know how language works, Hutt?
I do. You don't. Something can be two or more things simultaneously.
But it can't be something that it's not.
You said it's NOT a poem. Which apparently means it's found in a book or something equally ridiculous.
On 2/5/24 6:06 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
On 2/4/24 1:39 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <17b0a1e3ad5c4bc1$1518$2154774$cad58068@news.newsdemon.com>, >>> trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
On 2/3/24 12:33 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <6svvN.287659$q3F7.75911@fx45.iad>,It meant an inscription is something you read on a statue and a poem is >>>> recited or printed in a book.
trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
On 2/1/24 11:24 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
No response here, Hutt? Your flapping jowls always have so much to say
but here you're silent...
ME: I'm not sure why everyone treats that poem
HUTT: It's an inscription, not a poem. Are you really an American? >>>>>>>
ME: "The New Colossus" is a sonnet by American POET Emma Lazarus. She >>>>>>> wrote the POEM in 1883 to raise money for the construction of the >>>>>>> pedestal for the Statue of Liberty.
In 1903, the POEM was cast onto a bronze plaque and mounted inside the
pedestal's lower level.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_Colossus
Are YOU really an American, Hutt?
It's a poem inscribed on a statue, what the fuck else do you need to >>>>>> know?
So when you said, "It's an inscription, not a poem", that meant what? >>>>
So "[It's] not a poem" means it's in a book?
Do you know how language works, Hutt?
I do. You don't. Something can be two or more things simultaneously.
But it can't be something that it's not.
You said it's NOT a poem. Which apparently means it's found in a book or something equally ridiculous.
when it becomes an inscription on a statue, the most accurate can correct description is that of a poem.
In article <qPmwN.305846$PuZ9.48130@fx11.iad>,
trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
On 2/5/24 6:06 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
On 2/4/24 1:39 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <17b0a1e3ad5c4bc1$1518$2154774$cad58068@news.newsdemon.com>, >>>>> trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
On 2/3/24 12:33 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <6svvN.287659$q3F7.75911@fx45.iad>,It meant an inscription is something you read on a statue and a poem is >>>>>> recited or printed in a book.
trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
On 2/1/24 11:24 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
No response here, Hutt? Your flapping jowls always have so much to say
but here you're silent...
ME: I'm not sure why everyone treats that poem
HUTT: It's an inscription, not a poem. Are you really an American? >>>>>>>>>
ME: "The New Colossus" is a sonnet by American POET Emma Lazarus. She >>>>>>>>> wrote the POEM in 1883 to raise money for the construction of the >>>>>>>>> pedestal for the Statue of Liberty.
In 1903, the POEM was cast onto a bronze plaque and mounted inside the
pedestal's lower level.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_Colossus
Are YOU really an American, Hutt?
It's a poem inscribed on a statue, what the fuck else do you need to >>>>>>>> know?
So when you said, "It's an inscription, not a poem", that meant what? >>>>>>
So "[It's] not a poem" means it's in a book?
Do you know how language works, Hutt?
I do. You don't. Something can be two or more things simultaneously.
But it can't be something that it's not.
You said it's NOT a poem. Which apparently means it's found in a book or >>> something equally ridiculous.
when it becomes an inscription on a statue, the most accurate can correct
description is that of a poem.
What?
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 78:06:16 |
| Calls: | 6,716 |
| Files: | 12,247 |
| Messages: | 5,357,827 |
