• Perverting the Course of Justice

    From Calvin Henry-Cotnam@21:1/5 to All on Thu Nov 11 16:29:58 2021
    There has been a number of times on Corrie where someone was either
    threatened with being charged with Perverting the Course of Justice,
    or actually has been.

    It wasn't that long ago when Gary was found with the 'weapon' used
    on Adam and confessed to it. When it came out that Faye was really
    responsible, the charges against Gary were revised to Perverting the
    Course of Justice and he was quickly found guilty of that. While his
    record likely meant that he would get a custodial sentence, it seemed
    to me there was an air of "well, we already have him in custody so
    we'll just keep him in under new charges".

    I'm over-simplifying Gary's story, but I bring it up to demonstrate
    an example of Corrie's constabulatory jumping to charge someone with
    Perverting the Course of Justice at the drop of a hat.

    This brings me to my main question: So what about Stefan Brent (Corey's father)?

    When Cory and Stefan were "delivered" to the police, there was NOTHING
    shown of Stefan being charged with Perverting the Course of Justice,
    even though the police mentioned the false testimony of Eli Higginson
    (and his father Christian) was being recanted.

    I don't know UK law that well, but does helping Corey to leave the
    country to escape justice involve this charge, or is there another
    charge like aiding and abetting a fugitive that applies?

    While I was pleased to see Corey going to prison and losing his football career, I *REALLY* want to see that smug bastard Stefan go to prison.

    I want to see "Mr Untouchable" go to prison, where he sure will become
    very touchable. ;-)

    Come on Corrie writers - if you still watch this newsgroup, please have
    Stefan Brent do some prison time. We don't need to see the trial, or
    even him being interviewed by police. Just a mention between other
    characters about him getting whatever sentenece would be appreciated!

    --
    Calvin Henry-Cotnam
    "Unusual or extreme reactions to events caused by negligence
    are imaginable, but not reasonably foreseeable"
    - Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin, May 2008

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From kat@21:1/5 to Calvin Henry-Cotnam on Thu Nov 11 23:00:19 2021
    On 11/11/2021 21:29, Calvin Henry-Cotnam wrote:
    There has been a number of times on Corrie where someone was either threatened with being charged with Perverting the Course of Justice,
    or actually has been.

    It wasn't that long ago when Gary was found with the 'weapon' used
    on Adam and confessed to it. When it came out that Faye was really responsible, the charges against Gary were revised to Perverting the
    Course of Justice and he was quickly found guilty of that. While his
    record likely meant that he would get a custodial sentence, it seemed
    to me there was an air of "well, we already have him in custody so
    we'll just keep him in under new charges".

    I'm over-simplifying Gary's story, but I bring it up to demonstrate
    an example of Corrie's constabulatory jumping to charge someone with Perverting the Course of Justice at the drop of a hat.

    This brings me to my main question: So what about Stefan Brent (Corey's father)?

    When Cory and Stefan were "delivered" to the police, there was NOTHING
    shown of Stefan being charged with Perverting the Course of Justice,
    even though the police mentioned the false testimony of Eli Higginson
    (and his father Christian) was being recanted.

    I don't know UK law that well, but does helping Corey to leave the
    country to escape justice involve this charge, or is there another
    charge like aiding and abetting a fugitive that applies?

    "assisting others to evade arrest for a significant period of time" is an example of an act which may constitute the offence of perverting the course of justice

    But apparently there is a General Charging Practice which has to decide among other things,
    "was motivated by misplaced loyalty to a relative/friend or was part of a concerted effort to avoid, pervert, or defeat justice" and if it was planned and
    stuff like that.

    https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/public-justice-offences-incorporating-charging-standard

    He might have got away with it as "somewhat spontaneous, looking out for his son", but of course, he also arranged for Eli to lie in the first trial, that was definitely perversion, and planned. Though I suppose he could insist he believed Corey innocent at the time!

    And I think Eli must have come clean later, after the arrest, so maybe he will still get done. Eli also perverted justice, but he's a kid, his dad presumably applied some pressure to him.



    While I was pleased to see Corey going to prison and losing his football career, I *REALLY* want to see that smug bastard Stefan go to prison.

    I want to see "Mr Untouchable" go to prison, where he sure will become
    very touchable. ;-)

    Come on Corrie writers - if you still watch this newsgroup, please have Stefan Brent do some prison time. We don't need to see the trial, or
    even him being interviewed by police. Just a mention between other
    characters about him getting whatever sentenece would be appreciated!



    --
    kat
    >^..^<

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Calvin Henry-Cotnam@21:1/5 to All on Fri Nov 12 08:49:10 2021
    kat (littlelionne@hotmail.com) said...

    He might have got away with it as "somewhat spontaneous, looking out for
    his son", but of course, he also arranged for Eli to lie in the first
    trial, that was definitely perversion, and planned. Though I suppose he >could insist he believed Corey innocent at the time!

    I find it dubious that really believing in someone's innocence is a justification for breaking the law. Stefan basically tampered with a
    witness.

    And I think Eli must have come clean later, after the arrest, so maybe
    he will still get done. Eli also perverted justice, but he's a kid, his
    dad presumably applied some pressure to him.

    Eli's dad accepted a job that he would not otherwise been offered, and
    perhaps may not have had the qualifications enough for anyone to call
    him in for an interview if he had applied.

    Doing so and pressuring Eli to give false testimony seems to be in the
    same basket as witness tampering.

    --
    Calvin Henry-Cotnam
    "Unusual or extreme reactions to events caused by negligence
    are imaginable, but not reasonably foreseeable"
    - Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin, May 2008

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From kat@21:1/5 to Calvin Henry-Cotnam on Fri Nov 12 21:06:36 2021
    On 12/11/2021 13:49, Calvin Henry-Cotnam wrote:
    kat (littlelionne@hotmail.com) said...

    He might have got away with it as "somewhat spontaneous, looking out for
    his son", but of course, he also arranged for Eli to lie in the first
    trial, that was definitely perversion, and planned. Though I suppose he
    could insist he believed Corey innocent at the time!

    I find it dubious that really believing in someone's innocence is a justification for breaking the law. Stefan basically tampered with a
    witness.

    He can suggest it at trial, defence, or mitigation, see if he gets believed. We,
    of course, wouldn't. :-)

    And I think Eli must have come clean later, after the arrest, so maybe
    he will still get done. Eli also perverted justice, but he's a kid, his
    dad presumably applied some pressure to him.

    Eli's dad accepted a job that he would not otherwise been offered, and perhaps may not have had the qualifications enough for anyone to call
    him in for an interview if he had applied.

    Doing so and pressuring Eli to give false testimony seems to be in the
    same basket as witness tampering.


    It is, but it is Stefan and Eli's dad who are guilty. I was setting out the defence for Eli, who is also guilty but I suspect would only be cautioned at most due to that pressure.

    --
    kat
    >^..^<

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Calvin Henry-Cotnam@21:1/5 to All on Sat Nov 13 01:30:37 2021
    kat (littlelionne@hotmail.com) said...
    On 12/11/2021 13:49, Calvin Henry-Cotnam wrote:
    kat (littlelionne@hotmail.com) said...

    He might have got away with it as "somewhat spontaneous, looking out for >>> his son", but of course, he also arranged for Eli to lie in the first
    trial, that was definitely perversion, and planned. Though I suppose he >>> could insist he believed Corey innocent at the time!

    I find it dubious that really believing in someone's innocence is a
    justification for breaking the law. Stefan basically tampered with a
    witness.

    He can suggest it at trial, defence, or mitigation, see if he gets
    believed. We, of course, wouldn't. :-)

    True. I suspect that this would not, or at least should not, be a
    consideration when it comes to determining guilt. Though I could see
    it making a difference when it comes to sentencing.


    And I think Eli must have come clean later, after the arrest, so maybe
    he will still get done. Eli also perverted justice, but he's a kid, his
    dad presumably applied some pressure to him.

    Eli's dad accepted a job that he would not otherwise been offered, and
    perhaps may not have had the qualifications enough for anyone to call
    him in for an interview if he had applied.

    Doing so and pressuring Eli to give false testimony seems to be in the
    same basket as witness tampering.


    It is, but it is Stefan and Eli's dad who are guilty. I was setting out the >defence for Eli, who is also guilty but I suspect would only be cautioned at >most due to that pressure.

    Yes, I suspect Eli could receive a caution, or perhaps a non-custodial sentence. The real culprits, where quid pro quo was involved, are Eli's
    father and Stefan.

    --
    Calvin Henry-Cotnam
    "Unusual or extreme reactions to events caused by negligence
    are imaginable, but not reasonably foreseeable"
    - Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin, May 2008

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From kat@21:1/5 to Calvin Henry-Cotnam on Mon Nov 15 09:11:01 2021
    On 13/11/2021 06:30, Calvin Henry-Cotnam wrote:
    kat (littlelionne@hotmail.com) said...
    On 12/11/2021 13:49, Calvin Henry-Cotnam wrote:
    kat (littlelionne@hotmail.com) said...

    He might have got away with it as "somewhat spontaneous, looking out for >>>> his son", but of course, he also arranged for Eli to lie in the first
    trial, that was definitely perversion, and planned. Though I suppose he >>>> could insist he believed Corey innocent at the time!

    I find it dubious that really believing in someone's innocence is a
    justification for breaking the law. Stefan basically tampered with a
    witness.

    He can suggest it at trial, defence, or mitigation, see if he gets
    believed. We, of course, wouldn't. :-)

    True. I suspect that this would not, or at least should not, be a consideration when it comes to determining guilt. Though I could see
    it making a difference when it comes to sentencing.

    Yes. In that link I provided before there are a number of points regarding the assessment of the conduct ( where there is a Public Justic offence) and if there should be a charge at all. Public intersest factors might suggest not. but when they do go ahead the same considerations will apply when sentence is being considered.



    And I think Eli must have come clean later, after the arrest, so maybe >>>> he will still get done. Eli also perverted justice, but he's a kid, his >>>> dad presumably applied some pressure to him.

    Eli's dad accepted a job that he would not otherwise been offered, and
    perhaps may not have had the qualifications enough for anyone to call
    him in for an interview if he had applied.

    Doing so and pressuring Eli to give false testimony seems to be in the
    same basket as witness tampering.


    It is, but it is Stefan and Eli's dad who are guilty. I was setting out the >> defence for Eli, who is also guilty but I suspect would only be cautioned at >> most due to that pressure.

    Yes, I suspect Eli could receive a caution, or perhaps a non-custodial sentence. The real culprits, where quid pro quo was involved, are Eli's father and Stefan.


    Looking closer at that link it is firstly Stefan who is to blame, in the original trial. Under perverting the course of justice comes "persuading, or attempting to persuade, by intimidation, harm or otherwise, a witness not to give evidence, to alter his evidence or to give false evidence". Eli also by "agreeing to give false evidence" but Eli's actual offence is perjury. But it isn't really in the public interest to come down hard on him, he was intimidated.

    It would be good if there was, at some point, a passing reference to something about Stefan at least getting some sort of sentence.



    --
    kat
    >^..^<

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Calvin Henry-Cotnam@21:1/5 to All on Thu Nov 18 09:04:27 2021
    kat (littlelionne@hotmail.com) said...

    It would be good if there was, at some point, a passing reference to >something about Stefan at least getting some sort of sentence.

    That's what I'm hoping for.

    We don't need to see his trial, though it would be nice to see the
    justice system smack away his smug smile when he learns he can't buy
    his way out. ;-)

    --
    Calvin Henry-Cotnam
    "Unusual or extreme reactions to events caused by negligence
    are imaginable, but not reasonably foreseeable"
    - Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin, May 2008

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From kat@21:1/5 to Calvin Henry-Cotnam on Fri Nov 19 11:13:48 2021
    On 18/11/2021 14:04, Calvin Henry-Cotnam wrote:
    kat (littlelionne@hotmail.com) said...

    It would be good if there was, at some point, a passing reference to
    something about Stefan at least getting some sort of sentence.

    That's what I'm hoping for.

    We don't need to see his trial, though it would be nice to see the
    justice system smack away his smug smile when he learns he can't buy
    his way out. ;-)



    Oh yes, it really would!


    --
    kat
    >^..^<

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From capricorn40@21:1/5 to Calvin Henry-Cotnam on Mon Nov 29 01:24:30 2021
    On Thursday, November 11, 2021 at 9:30:01 PM UTC, Calvin Henry-Cotnam wrote:
    There has been a number of times on Corrie where someone was either threatened with being charged with Perverting the Course of Justice,
    or actually has been.

    I don't know UK law that well, but does helping Corey to leave the
    country to escape justice involve this charge, or is there another
    charge like aiding and abetting a fugitive that applies?


    If you want to read a real live example, look at the case of girlfriend of Ian Huntley, Maxine Carr:

    https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/5557736/maxine-carr-ian-huntley-soham-murders/ She didn't know he meandered those girls, but she gave a statement saying he was somewhere he wasn't.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From kat@21:1/5 to All on Mon Nov 29 10:05:14 2021
    On 29/11/2021 09:27, capricorn40 wrote:
    On Monday, November 29, 2021 at 9:24:31 AM UTC, capricorn40 wrote:
    On Thursday, November 11, 2021 at 9:30:01 PM UTC, Calvin Henry-Cotnam wrote: >>> There has been a number of times on Corrie where someone was either
    threatened with being charged with Perverting the Course of Justice,
    or actually has been.

    I don't know UK law that well, but does helping Corey to leave the
    country to escape justice involve this charge, or is there another
    charge like aiding and abetting a fugitive that applies?


    If you want to read a real live example, look at the case of girlfriend of Ian Huntley, Maxine Carr:

    https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/5557736/maxine-carr-ian-huntley-soham-murders/ >> She didn't know he meandered those girls, but she gave a statement saying he was somewhere he wasn't.
    Jezz, murdered, not meandered. (stupid autocorrect)


    I do love auto-correct.:-)

    Maxine is an interesting comparison. An adult as opposed to Eli the child, but certainly under a strong influence from Huntley. Of course, had they been married she could only be compelled to give any evidence against him in very limited circumstances, and she certainly wouldn't be the first woman to cover for her man.

    "look love, they are asking where people were, you know I was just <insert excuse> so say I was here, yeah? "

    I wonder if she knew what he had done when she originally did? So long ago now
    I forget what I read at the time.


    --
    kat
    >^..^<

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From capricorn40@21:1/5 to All on Mon Nov 29 01:27:05 2021
    On Monday, November 29, 2021 at 9:24:31 AM UTC, capricorn40 wrote:
    On Thursday, November 11, 2021 at 9:30:01 PM UTC, Calvin Henry-Cotnam wrote:
    There has been a number of times on Corrie where someone was either threatened with being charged with Perverting the Course of Justice,
    or actually has been.

    I don't know UK law that well, but does helping Corey to leave the
    country to escape justice involve this charge, or is there another
    charge like aiding and abetting a fugitive that applies?


    If you want to read a real live example, look at the case of girlfriend of Ian Huntley, Maxine Carr:

    https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/5557736/maxine-carr-ian-huntley-soham-murders/ She didn't know he meandered those girls, but she gave a statement saying he was somewhere he wasn't.
    Jezz, murdered, not meandered. (stupid autocorrect)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From capricorn40@21:1/5 to kat on Thu Dec 16 06:38:27 2021
    On Monday, November 29, 2021 at 10:05:19 AM UTC, kat wrote:
    On 29/11/2021 09:27, capricorn40 wrote:
    On Monday, November 29, 2021 at 9:24:31 AM UTC, capricorn40 wrote:
    On Thursday, November 11, 2021 at 9:30:01 PM UTC, Calvin Henry-Cotnam wrote:
    There has been a number of times on Corrie where someone was either
    threatened with being charged with Perverting the Course of Justice,
    or actually has been.

    I don't know UK law that well, but does helping Corey to leave the
    country to escape justice involve this charge, or is there another
    charge like aiding and abetting a fugitive that applies?


    If you want to read a real live example, look at the case of girlfriend of Ian Huntley, Maxine Carr:

    https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/5557736/maxine-carr-ian-huntley-soham-murders/
    She didn't know he meandered those girls, but she gave a statement saying he was somewhere he wasn't.
    Jezz, murdered, not meandered. (stupid autocorrect)

    I do love auto-correct.:-)

    Maxine is an interesting comparison. An adult as opposed to Eli the child, but
    certainly under a strong influence from Huntley. Of course, had they been married she could only be compelled to give any evidence against him in very limited circumstances, and she certainly wouldn't be the first woman to cover
    for her man.

    "look love, they are asking where people were, you know I was just <insert excuse> so say I was here, yeah? "

    I wonder if she knew what he had done when she originally did? So long ago now
    I forget what I read at the time.


    --
    kat
    ^..^<
    She claims she had no clue. He was accused of molesting a teen girl before further south, but was acquitted. So according to her, he asked her to cover for him because this had happened before but given the history of the acquittal she believed he was
    innocent.
    Later information was given that she actually suspected the girls were in the home, but sided to lie to the police.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)