• big lebowski laborious

    From gggg gggg@21:1/5 to brigit bardot brigade on Mon Sep 6 12:00:45 2021
    On Monday, July 26, 2004 at 7:25:01 PM UTC-7, brigit bardot brigade wrote:
    what is this? marijuanoir?
    i love the coen's o brother where art thou. i respect barton fink and
    fargo though don't much like them. i grudginly like man who wasn't
    there; it was derivative but it really had a core.
    anyway, what's most irritating about coens is the first sense i get
    from their movies is they've seen ALOT of movies. coens are more postmodernist interior decorators than real artists. sometimes they
    do it astonishingly well or with genuine brilliance but more often
    than not, they strike me as tim burton for the arthouse crowd.
    o brother was an exception because its primary sources of inspiration
    were music, discarded junkpile of forgotten americana, and whatnot.
    it fed on the past but it wasn't cinema cannibalizing cinema.
    like tarantino, coens are always mixing everything, like filmmaking is
    like shaking up a cocktail drink. hardly surprising that jeff bridges
    keeps mixing drinks in the movie. though set in contemporary times,
    you have a mix-n-match of 30s style screwball comedy, 40s style noir,
    70s style counterculture, and 90s style slickness. sometimes it's the
    styles, sometimes the characterizations or the plots, or genre
    convetions that are being jumbled together; the only constant is the inconstant. so a polish-catholic is a jew. and he confuses vietnam
    with everything. a rich guy is really not so rich. the kidnapped
    woman wasn't kidnapped. criminals are really disgrunted rock
    musicians. etc, etc. but not surprisingly, juliann moore showed her
    skanky buff again. someone stop this woman.
    well, this sort of thing would be funny for a 10 min skit. as a 2 hr
    movie, it's tiresome. try stretching any SNL parody skit into a movie
    and you get the point. i don't mind a 2 hr comedy, but a movie where
    nothing holds together and everything exists only to be sent up?
    flush it. and it's not like Airplane which was consistently zany.
    coens give us a character who's reasonably realistic and genuinely
    likable so when the world around him is just a cheap carnival act that
    grows dumber, more ludicrous, and staler by the minute, what's the
    point?
    it had some laughs. and the musical numbers were clever but, again,
    too derivative. okay, so coens have seen all the noirs. they've seen
    all the musicals and etc etc etc. I DON'T CARE. show me something i
    haven't seen before. is that too much to ask?
    no, as after lebowski, they made their greatest movie, a real
    masterpiece with o brother where art thou?
    we need REAL originality. no more postmodernischtick please.

    https://newrepublic.com/article/147341/film-critics-blind-big-lebowskis-brilliance

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)