THE MT VOID
Mt. Holz Science Fiction Society
12/03/21 -- Vol. 40, No. 23, Whole Number 2200
Co-Editor: Mark Leeper,
mleeper@optonline.net
Co-Editor: Evelyn Leeper,
eleeper@optonline.net
Sending Address:
evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com
All material is the opinion of the author and is copyrighted by the
author unless otherwise noted.
All comments sent or posted will be assumed authorized for
inclusion unless otherwise noted.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, send mail to
eleeper@optonline.net
The latest issue is at <
http://www.leepers.us/mtvoid/latest.htm>.
An index with links to the issues of the MT VOID since 1986 is at <
http://leepers.us/mtvoid/back_issues.htm>.
Topics:
Milestones
THE DYBBUK (1938) (film review by Mark R. Leeper)
THE RELENTLESS MOON by Mary Robinette Kowal (audiobook review
by Joe Karpierz
MONKEY BUSINESS (letter of comment by Kevin R)
This Week's Reading (THE LAST PAGAN) (book comments
by Evelyn C. Leeper)
===================================================================
TOPIC: Milestones
Today we hit another milestone, with issue #2200.
===================================================================
TOPIC: THE DYBBUK (1938) (film review by Mark R. Leeper)
[This review was first published in 1989. THE DYBBUK is running on
TCM December 5, at 8:00 PM.]
CAPSULE: Paydirt! A Yiddish film made in Poland in 1938 turns out
to be a little-known gem. The film lacks a lot of what we might
consider high production values, but besides being an unintentional
artifact of the culture of Eastern European Jewry wiped out in the
Holocaust, it also turns out to be a haunting horror film that
deserves to be seen by all fans of 1920s and 1930s horror films.
At least one sequence, a grotesque dance, ranks this film up with
some of the best of German Expressionism. Rating: +3 (-4 to +4).
Watching the 1938 Polish-made Yiddish film THE DYBBUK, one is only
too aware that the film is flawed. Much of the acting is
exaggerated as it would be in a silent film. Some of the
photography seems poor, as well as some of the editing. At least
once the film cuts from a quiet scene to a loud scene and the
sudden sound causes the audience to jump. It is true, however,
that in retrospect most of the faults seem hard to remember. The
strongest memories of the film are beautiful images, some haunting
and horrifying. And while taken individually many of the scenes
were less effective for me than they may have been for THE DYBBUK's
intended audience, this is a great mystical horror film, perhaps
one of the better horror films of the 1930s.
[Spoilers follow, though as with a Shakespeare play, one does not
see THE DYBBUK for plot surprises.]
Sender and Nisn have been very close friends since their student
days. Now they see each other only on holidays. To cement the
bond of their friendship they vow that if their respective first
children--each expected soon--are of opposite sexes then they will
arrange a marriage of the two children. Sure enough, Sender has a
daughter Leyele, though he loses his wife in childbirth. Nisn has a
son, Khonnon, though an accident claims Nisn's life before he can
even see his new son or conclude his arrangement to marry Khonnon
to Leyele.
Years later Khonnon, now a Talmudic scholar, meets Leyele and they
fall in love. Neither knows about the vow they would be married
and Sender does not know whose son Khonnon is. The intense Khonnon
is already considering giving up his study of the Talmud to study
Kabalah, the great book of mystical knowledge and magic. Sender
three times tries to arrange a marriage with a rich but rather
sheepish young man. Twice the plans fail and Khonnon believes his
magic has averted the arrangement. The third time, however, an
agreement is reached. Khonnon calls upon dark forces to help him
but is consumed by his own spell and found dead. The day of
Leyele's marriage--in fact, during the marriage ceremony itself--
Khonnon's spirit returns from the grave as a dybbuk, a possessing
demon, and takes over the body of the woman he was denied. Leyele
is taken to a great and pious Rabbi, now nearing the end of his
life and torn with self-doubts, who alone may have the knowledge to
remove the demon.
If some of this smacks of William Peter Blatty, it should be
remembered that this is a 1938 film based on a pre-World-War-I
play. THE DYBBUK by S. Anski (a pen name for Shloyme Zanvl
Rappoport), along with THE GOLEM by H. Leivick (a pen name for
Leivick Halper), are perhaps the two best remembered (and most
commonly translated) plays of the great Yiddish Theater. While
Yiddish folklore has many dybbuk and golem stories, and the play
THE GOLEM was based on an actual legend ("The Golem of Prague"),
THE DYBBUK was an original story involving a legendary type of
demon. The film retells the story of the play, but remains very
different. Other than plot there is not much of the play carried
over into the film.
All too commonly constraints of budget and even what appears now to
be inappropriate style rob some scenes of their effect. Much of
the acting is exaggerated in ways that might have been more
appropriate to silent film or to the stage. In fact, in some ways
this feels like an entire film done in a style much like the early,
good scenes of the 1931 DRACULA. Director Michal Waszynski could
well be excused on the grounds that he was making the film for a
very different audience. However, just occasionally, a scene will
be really supremely well done. The best sequence of the film is
when Leyele, just before her marriage, is called upon to dance with
the poor of the town, as is traditional. Leyele is reluctant and
the dance turns into a grotesquery culminating with Leyele dancing
with a figure of death. The film is a showcase for Yiddish songs,
cantorial singing, and dancing, both traditional and modern. Much
seems out of place, but this one dance creates one of the most
eerie and effective horror scenes of its decade.
THE DYBBUK stands as more than a good horror film. It is also an
artifact of pre-Holocaust Yiddish film and of Eastern European
Jewish village life. Curiously, for a Yiddish film some of the
stereotypes that appear could be interpreted as being anti-Semitic.
We see a miser with exaggerated Jewish features counting and
recounting his coins. We see what is intended to be a great Rabbi
looking pompous, fat, sloppy, and apparently lazy. Why a Yiddish
film would have such images is open to question. Still, it is a
pity that this film is not better known. It deserves to be thought
of as a major film of its decade. I rate it +3 on the -4 to +4
scale. Congratulations to the National Center for Jewish Film for
restoring this film. [-mrl]
===================================================================
TOPIC: THE RELENTLESS MOON by Mary Robinette Kowal (copyright 2020,
TOR, $17.99, trade paperback, 542pp, ISBN 978-1-250-23696-8,
copyright 2020, Audible Inc., $25.99 audiobook, 17 hours and 35
minutes, ASIN B08B7DXVXC, narrated by Mary Robinette Kowal)
(audiobook review by Joe Karpierz)
THE RELENTLESS MOON is the third book in Mary Robinette Kowal's
Lady Astronaut of Mars series, but it doesn't immediately follow on
to THE FATED SKY, the story of Lady Astronaut Elma York and her
colleagues heading out to Mars (which I reviewed in June of 2021).
Rather, it is a parallel story to that novel, telling the story of
astronaut Nicole Wargin going to the moon while York is headed to
Mars.
Nicole Wargin is married to the governor of Kansas, a man who has
designs on the presidency of the United States. The situation on
Earth, both politically and physically, is dire. The climate is
getting worse, as a result of the meteor strike that set things in
motion back in THE CALCULATING STARS. The political climate is not
much better, if not worse, as there are attempts to sabotage the
space program and derail it from its goal of getting as many people
off the Earth as possible in order to save them before the planet
becomes uninhabitable.
But the space program goes on. Nicole goes to the moon on a
mission, but before she gets there, problems erupt with the lander.
And then there are more problems, and more problems, and ... well,
you get the idea. It's determined that there is indeed a saboteur
in their midst who is trying to act to convince world powers that
they should stop the program and spend the money on earth in order
to help the people who are starving and worse as a result of the
meteor strike.
In reality, Nicole is there to try to root out Icarus, the code
name for the group that is trying to shut down the space program.
We learn a lot about Nicole's background as this plays out. We
learn that she herself was a spy back during the war, and that past
is helping her in her investigation into all the problems that have
been hitting the colony on the moon.
Icarus itself has setbacks, as a polio outbreak in the colony has
caused much of the personnel to get sick, some unable to recover
from the disease. There was supposed to be polio vaccine on the
expedition, but that suppy was hit by the saboteurs as well. The
novel reads like The Perils of Pauline, with one thing happening
after another in a, well, relentless fashion.
Nicole is not the most likeable person in the book. Much is made
of her history of anorexia nervosa, and the condition plays heavily
into the story. On Earth she lives a high class, wealthy situation
as a result of being the wife of a powerful political individual
who has high aspirations. She really is pampered, with all the
trappings of wealth that one would expect from that background. I
bring this up because I find it a bit unsettling that while there
is much talk in the novel of poverty-stricken people who don't have
enough to eat and who live in squalor, the main character has a
totally different lifestyle. I'm not sure what kind of message
Kowal is trying to send with that dichotomy, but it does seem a bit
off to me. There is a lot to unpack in this and other messages
within the book. And while the messages are worthwhile, I did feel
at times that I was being beaten over the head with those messages.
That's not to say that this is not a good book; far from it. It
was engaging and well written, and while we as readers can assume
that things are going to turn out okay, it was well worth my time
to find out how Kowal was going to get there.
Kowal herself narrated the novel as she did with the previous two,
and as usual she did a fine job, which just added to my enjoyment
of the story. There's really not much else I can say about that.
I don't often know what to say about narrators whom I have heard
multiple times. I guess that if the narration was lacking there
would be more to say. Clearly, not in this case.
It will be interesting to see where Kowal takes the story from
here. [-jak]
===================================================================
TOPIC: MONKEY BUSINESS (letter of comment by Kevin R)
In response to Mark's review of MONKEY BUSINESS (1952) in the
11/26/21 issue of the MT VOID, Kevin R writes:
A script using magic might have been mined from Thorne Smith's THE
GLORIOUS POOL, though the studio might not have had access to the
rights. Cary Grant had played a Smith character before, the late
George Kerby, in TOPPER, a favorite of mine. [-kr]
===================================================================
TOPIC: This Week's Reading (book comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)
THE LAST PAGAN: JULIAN THE APOSTATE AND THE DEATH OF THE ANCIENT
WORLD by Adrian Murdoch (Inner Traditions, ISBN 978-1-594-77226-9)
is proof that it is not just science fiction and fantasy books that
get totally inaccurate cover illustrations. In this book, Julian
is described as "dark-haired" and with a "pendulous lower lip that
was hidden behind the bristly beard he wore trimmed to a point."
The cover shows a man with reddish-gold hair, a rather normal-
looking lower lip, and no beard.
But one should not judge a book by its cover, and the contents seem
more true to what knowledge we have of his life and reign. More so
than with many other emperors, our knowledge of Julian suffers from
the problem of the winner writing the history. As the full title
indicates, Julian was a pagan who attempted to restore paganism and
suppress Christianity as part of that process. So when he died and
was replaced by a Christian emperor, it is not surprising that
almost all the historians (mostly Church fathers) wrote negatively
of Julian. Ammoanus and Libanius, who both personally knew Julian,
were both pagans, which does help to counterbalance the writings of
the Church fathers. Murdoch assembles information from as many
sources as possible and offers explanations of policies to which
contemporary historians often attributed wrong reasons, or no
reasons.
This is a book intended for the general reader, and at about 250
pages of text, does not require a major investment of time. Julian
was one of the more unusual emperors, and perhaps of particular
interest with the rise of neo-paganism over the last several
decades. [-ecl]
===================================================================
Mark Leeper
mleeper@optonline.net
[Sir Stafford Cripps] has all the virtues I dislike
and none of the vices I admire.
--Winston Churchill
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)