THE MT VOID
Mt. Holz Science Fiction Society
10/08/21 -- Vol. 40, No. 15, Whole Number 2192
Co-Editor: Mark Leeper,
mleeper@optonline.net
Co-Editor: Evelyn Leeper,
eleeper@optonline.net
Sending Address:
evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com
All material is the opinion of the author and is copyrighted by the
author unless otherwise noted.
All comments sent or posted will be assumed authorized for
inclusion unless otherwise noted.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, send mail to
eleeper@optonline.net
The latest issue is at <
http://www.leepers.us/mtvoid/latest.htm>.
An index with links to the issues of the MT VOID since 1986 is at <
http://leepers.us/mtvoid/back_issues.htm>.
Topics:
THE FLY (1958) (film comments by Mark R. Leeper)
TCM's October Promotion Email
The "Living Dead" Saga (letter of comment
by Dorothy J. Heydt)
FORBIDDEN PLANET (letter of comment by Dorothy J. Heydt)
This Week's Reading (Hugo Award novelettes finalists)
(book comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)
===================================================================
TOPIC: THE FLY (1958) (film comments by Mark R. Leeper)
Two weeks ago I made THE FLY (1958) my pick for November, but did
not say very much about it. Let me say some more this week.
THE FLY (1958) is a film that surprised even its producers. They
knew the story was a little silly and expected only a modest return
on the film from a mostly young audience. Even the film's name
stars, Vincent Price and Herbert Marshall, could not take THE FLY
seriously. The audience, on the other hand, found that there was
much to respond to in the film. THE FLY cost $350,000 to make and
grossed $3,000,000 on its release, considerably outstripping any
expectation. Based on results of this film 20th Century Fox went
on to make several other science fiction films. I would contend
that the reason this film had the impact that it did is that it
really is very much an archetypal story, an "Oedipus Rex" for the
scientific age. It is the story of a man who has just about
anything a man could want and loses it all in a moment of hubris.
Helene and Andre Delambre, the major characters, have a warm and
loving relationship and they love life. Andre himself just follows
his curiosity as his profession, and that provides enough so they
live very well. And in one moment of pride and carelessness it was
all turned into horror. It is interesting to note that this is a
film with no human--or even non-human--villains. Essentially,
everybody wants the best for everybody else. It is basically
people after a disastrous mistake struggling to put things right
again. It is most unusual to have a horror film in which there is
no ill-will. People even are doing what they see as acting in
young Philippe's best interest when they so brazenly lie to him.
Today candor seems a little more in vogue.
The film was directed by Kurt Neumann, who counted among his films
several low-budget Tarzan movies, ROCKETSHIP X-M, and more recently
(for Fox) SHE DEVIL and KRONOS. With the possible exception of
KRONOS, there is not much there to suggest that he could have been
responsible for how well THE FLY resonated with audiences. More
likely it is the mythic elements from the story. THE FLY is based
on a short story by George Langelaan that appeared in Playboy
magazine.
The original story took place in France, but here it was moved to
Montreal to explain the French names while placing it in an
environment that the audience could identify with. The plot starts
almost immediately with a strange mystery. Andre and Helene
Delambre (Al Hedison and Patricia Owens) seemed to be in love as
much as any married couple could be. Andre and his brother
Francois owned an extremely successful electronics research and
development company. Things seemed perfect for them and it. But
in the first moments of the plot the idyllic life of the Delambres
is over. The night watchman at Delambre Freres has found Helene
over the dead body of Andre. It seems he was killed in a factory
press. What makes this all seem even stranger is that Andre should
have known the press was coming down if it was. He would have had
to have been a most cooperative victim in his own murder. What is
more, Helene did not know how to operate the press. That just
does not make any kind of sense.
Francois is called almost immediately by Helene and he in turn
calls in Inspector Charas of the Surete to do the police work.
Helene admits to the killing, but refuses to give answer certain
questions so that the action still just does not add up. Helene is
free with some information, but other questions she insists that
she cannot answer. The one hole in this behavior is that she
seems to have developed a fixation on seeing flies--any fly that
can be caught. Francois finds out that Helene is looking for a
particular fly with a white head. In an attempt to find out what
really happened, he bluffs to Helene that he has the fly and
convinces her that he will destroy the fly as she wants if she will
explain why and how she killed Andre. She begins to tell her
story.
In the flashback story Andre unveils to her the device that has
occupied much of his time recently. He has developed a matter
transmission machine. It disintegrates solid objects placed in a
transmission booth, transmits the matter to a receiving booth and
reintegrates the object. In demonstrating the machine it generally
works, but has occasional malfunctions--not surprisingly for a new
piece of technology. At first the machine creates a mirror image
of the object being transmitted. Then for an unknown reason it
fails to reintegrate just when the family cat Dandello is sent.
But eventually it seems to be reliable, transmitting a guinea pig
and allowing her to reintegrate. The machine seems to work and
Andre invites Francois to see the machine in action. But instead
of meeting his brother he leaves a note that he cannot see
Francois. At about the same time Philippe finds a white-headed
fly, but Helene makes him let it go. Andre refuses to leave the
lab or be seen. That night he passes another note out of the lab
saying he has had a problem. It seems he wants Helene to look for
a particular fly with a white head. She is allowed into the lab,
but Andre has a cloth over his head and his hand in his pocket.
When Helene tells Andre that she made Philippe release a fly with
the white head Andre is shocked enough to take what should be his
left hand out of his pocket, but instead of a hand there is a sort
of black claw. Andre can eat only liquids which he seems to
noisily slurp. It seems that Andre transmitted himself with a fly
in the box with him and the two had their atoms mixed. Now he
needs the fly to untangle the two. The next day Helene and
Philippe search for the white-headed fly. They succeed only in
unknowingly letting the very fly they want get out the window.
Andre loses heart when the fly is not found and finds he is losing
control of his head and hand. He knows he needs the fly to
unscramble the atoms but he allows himself to cooperate with
Helene. He transmits himself one more time in the absurd belief
that it will do some good. Helene, ever the optimist, pulls the
cloth from his head and finds herself looking at a human-sized fly
head. (Note: in the story it is a cat head with fly eyes, a side
effect of the loss of Dandello.) Andre sees Helene's screaming
face through compound eyes in one of the most horrific scenes of
any film ever. Helene faints and Andre trying to control his body
lays her out on a couch in safety. The horror gives way to tragedy
as Andre tries to kiss Helene and realizes that he is no longer
physically capable of kissing or caressing her. In angry
frustration he destroys his laboratory and burns his notes.
Pulling the cloth back over his head he writes on the blackboard
asking Helene for help in destroying himself. More and more the
fly hand seems to be following orders of its own, his last humanity
is being lost. Andre takes Helene to the room with the press and
with her help he manages to commit suicide, being crushed in the
press to destroy all evidence of what happened to him.
Back in the present Francois and Inspector Charas cannot believe
the story. The inspector is going to have Helene arrested. He
returns with a warrant for murder against her. Helene is expecting
that having told the story her trouble are over and remains
confident until she finds out that Francois did not have the white-
headed fly. Helene is terrified that Philippe will see her being
arrested and asks Francois to take him away. Francois and Philippe
make small talk and Philippe, not realizing the significance, says
that he has seen the fly in a web. Francois is dumb-struck and
runs to Charas insisting that he come and see. Charas follows
reluctantly and is shocked to see a human-headed fly in the web
just as a spider attacks it. Charas takes a rock and destroys the
spider and the fly. Then, admitting to as much of a murder as
Helene has committed, he and Francois concoct a story to cover up
Helene's crime.
The only really familiar actors in the film at the time were
Vincent Price and Herbert Marshall. Both thought the film
hilarious, particularly the scene of the fly in the web, and
luckily they were relegated to what were actually very secondary
parts. Patricia Owens is really the main character and deserved
top billing with secondary credit going to Al "David" Hedison.
Ironically and luckily both give better performances than Price.
David Hedison went on to co-star in THE LOST WORLD and then to have
a long run on television in VOYAGE TO THE BOTTOM OF THE SEA, all
for 20th Century Fox.
There is genuine suspense in the film's mystery. Helene's actions
seem to be so out of character for her. Every conventional
explanation has a good reason why it does not explain the facts.
Andre had to have, at some level, cooperated with Helene, even if
only to the extent to show Helene how to run the press. Yet Andre
should have been able to commit suicide by himself had he wanted.
Clearly they both must have suddenly wanted Andre dead. And that
seems to make no sense. Then James Clavell adapted the George
Langelaan story into a screenplay. Clavell is, of course, known
best for a series of best-selling novels set in the Far East
including SHOGUN. Clavell also wrote the screenplay for THE SATAN
BUG, taking some liberties with the original story. In this case,
however, he maintained the original story very accurately. In so
many other films, even the remake, the transformed human is
dangerous and kills. While Andre is transformed, he never becomes
a monster, in spite of being a horrifying sight. Andre loses his
features and toward the end he loses control of himself, but he
never loses his humanity. Kurt Neumann seems to have risen to
match his script with high production values. The film has the
very good look of a careful and high-quality production. It was
shot in wide-screen and Technicolor.
Sadly, even with its classical tragic story this film also has its
moments that are all too easily mocked. Conservation of matter
would indicate that the fly's head on Andre's should be the size of
a fly's head. Similarly with the human head on the fly's body, you
should barely see the fly parts. The concept of the projection is
different from the concept in the remake. The 1958 version has
essentially a projector that moves atom for atom. It may distort
the image at the far end--like reversing it--but it should not just
switch selected parts. The remake has the device analyzing DNA and
essentially cloning it. I would say that this is a more absurd
approach to matter transmission. The simple fact is that humans
play host to many small life forms from eyelash mites to a variety
of organisms internally. There are many forms of DNA the machine
could pick to reproduce. Adding a fly just adds one more. And why
does it reproduce things like fingernails? That is non-living
matter and cannot be reproduced from DNA. It has been mentioned
that Helene disposes of her husband in the time-honored tradition
of disposing of flies, she squashes it in what is essentially a big
swatter.
Not all of Neumann's touches work. When the night watchman sees
the dead body his mouth drops open in an exaggerated scream, but
instead we hear the ringing of a phone. Hitchcock could have made
the scene work, but it really does not here. Neumann overuses the
sound of a fly's buzzing in the background; it becomes tiresome.
For the sound of the electronic equipment, a rhythmic cello-string
is used, borrowing an effect from THE WAR OF THE WORLDS. The one
unfortunate aspect of the script is that nobody asks the really
interesting questions. What happens when you can transmit people
across borders? Is the transmitted human really the same person or
just a replica? For at least some serious questions you must see
THE CURSE OF THE FLY and David Cronenberg's semi-remake. The fly's
head on Andre is quite well done and not made huge, as it was in
the sequel THE RETURN OF THE FLY. There was no good way to give a
fly a human head and little daub of white paint on the head is not
convincing. It is surprising in the scene where Helene and
Philippe are trying to capture what really is the right fly, they
were not saying the fly's head was white--an important detail and
one they would look for.
This is for me one of the milestones of the Fifties science fiction
film, and I give it a +3 on the -4 to +4 scale. [-mrl]
===================================================================
TOPIC: TCM's October Promotion Email
Join ACTOR Mario Cantone and TCM host Ben Mankiewicz EACH SUNDAY
EVENING IN OCTOBER for thrills, chills and some laughs along the
way. From creepy kids to terrifying family hauntings, there is
nothing more classic than scares and screams at Halloween.
SUNDAY, OCTOBER 3 Creature Features
8:00 PM The Birds (1963)
10:15 PM Little Shop of Horrors (1986)
Sunday, October 10 Creepy Kids
8:00 PM The Bad Seed (1956)
10:15 PM It's Alive (1974)
Sunday, October 17 Family Hauntings
8:00 PM Poltergeist (1982)
10:00 PM Burnt Offerings (1976)
Sunday, October 24 Bette and Joan Horror
8:00 PM What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? (1962)
10:30 PM Strait-Jacket (1964)
Sunday, October 31 Slashers
8:00 PM Psycho (1960)
10:00 PM Blow Out (1981)
Then spend Halloween with TCM with our Happy Halloween Marathon!
32 Movies Starting October 29 at 8 p.m. through October 31
[-tcm]
===================================================================
TOPIC: The "Living Dead" Saga (letter of comment by Dorothy
J. Heydt)
In response to Mark's comments on the "Living Dead" saga in the
10/01/21 issue of the MT VOID, Dorothy J. Heydt writes:
Magnificent prose saved to disk. Bravo! [-djh]
===================================================================
TOPIC: FORBIDDEN PLANET (letter of comment by Dorothy J. Heydt)
In response to Kip William's comments on a "Forbidden Planet" 45rpm
disc in the 10/01/21 issue of the MT VOID, Dorothy J. Heydt writes:
I had one of those 45s once: it was actually performed by Louis and
Bebe Barron on their electronic instruments, and was not bad. I
did a solo modern dance to it for some occasion or other in junior
college and got a lot of applause. (Never mind that I forgot my
carefully prepared choreography halfway through and had to
improvise. Ah, youth ... mine and my audience's.) [-djh]
===================================================================
TOPIC: This Week's Reading (book comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)
Well, I've finally caught up with my Hugo reading; this week I'll
comment on the novelettes.
"Burn, or the Episodic Life of Sam Wells as a Super", A. T.
Greenblatt (Uncanny Magazine, May/June 2020): Sam Wells wants to
join the other superheroes, but his super-power is that he can set
himself on fire, which hardly seems useful. On the other hand, he
is also an accountant... An interesting twist on the super-hero
genre.
"Helicopter Story", Isabel Fall (Clarkesworld, January 2020): This
generated a lot of controversy when it was first published under
the title "I Sexually Identify as an Attack Helicopter", with so
much vituperation directed at Fall personally that she asked to
have the story taken down, and basically disappeared from social
media for a while. Whether the title change has resolved these
issues is not clear (I suspect not entirely), Fall did accept the
nomination, so some sort of toning down has probably been achieved.
That said, I'm not sure I get *why* this was nominated for a Hugo.
Yes, it examines gender roles in a new way; contrast this with such
earlier works as THE SHIP WHO SANG or ROBOCOP, which ignore gender
issues altogether. Maybe (as I often fall back on) I'm not the
target audience, or maybe I'm just an old fart who is out of touch
with the world today, but it didn't ring the Hugo bell for me.
"The Inaccessibility of Heaven", Aliette de Bodard (Uncanny
Magazine, July/August 2020): This is a crime story set among the
Fallen, that is, the fallen angels after a rebellion in Heaven,
though the world itself it not quite ours. On the other hand, if
Heaven and the fallen angels and all that were real, maybe our
world *would* look like this. An interesting world-building
exercise.
"Monster", Naomi Kritzer (Clarkesworld, January 2020): **SEMI-
SPOILER** This is another "super-powers" story, though quite
different from Greenblatt's "Burn". Kritzer uses a series of
flashbacks within her "current" narrative to slowly reveal the
situation to which the main character is reacting. It becomes
obvious halfway through what is going on, and the resolution has a
touch of "pulling a rabbit out of a hat." It's an okay story, but
nothing great.
"The Pill", Meg Elison (from Big Girl, (PM Press)): The basic
premise is a pill that lets fat people lose all their excess weight
with no real effort (though there is some pain), but it kills ten
percent of the people who take it. It is all about body image,
body shame, and basically the same lookism that Ted Chiang
addresses in his "Liking What You See", but with the action being
initiated by the "target" rather than the "observers". Elison also
ups the ante by bringing in effects due to the change being real
rather than merely apparent. Insurers and those who pay the
insurers--hence most corporations--pressure fat people to take the
pill. When enough people have taken it, finding clothing, or
furniture, or anything, that will accommodate fat people becomes
increasingly difficult. But there are other, less predictable,
effects as well. A thoughtful, and well-thought-out, look at the
social effects of a technological change.
"Two Truths and a Lie", Sarah Pinsker (Tor.com): This explores the
boundaries between truths and lies and what happens when that
boundary blurs. I felt a little out of touch, though, when Pinsker
talks about the games Truth or Dare, or Two Truths an a Lie, she is
talking about things after my time. Truth or Dare has been around
since 1712 (supposedly), but only really caught on after Madonna
popularized it in 1991. I have no idea when Two Truths and a Lie
came along.
Ranking: "The Pill", "The Inaccessibility of Heaven", "Burn, or the
Episodic Life of Sam Wells as a Super", "Monster", no award,
"Helicopter Story", "Two Truths and a Lie"
[-ecl]
===================================================================
Mark Leeper
mleeper@optonline.net
I like long walks, especially when they are taken
by people who annoy me.
--Noel Coward
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)