• MT VOID, 11/24/23 -- Vol. 42, No. 21, Whole Number 2303

    From evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Sun Nov 26 07:06:15 2023
    THE MT VOID
    11/24/23 -- Vol. 42, No. 21, Whole Number 2303

    Co-Editor: Mark Leeper, mleeper@optonline.net
    Co-Editor: Evelyn Leeper, eleeper@optonline.net
    Sending Address: evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com
    All material is the opinion of the author and is copyrighted by the
    author unless otherwise noted.
    All comments sent or posted will be assumed authorized for
    inclusion unless otherwise noted.

    To subscribe or unsubscribe, send mail to eleeper@optonline.net
    The latest issue is at <http://www.leepers.us/mtvoid/latest.htm>.
    An index with links to the issues of the MT VOID since 1986 is at <http://leepers.us/mtvoid/back_issues.htm>.

    Topics:
    Middletown (NJ) Public Library Science Fiction Discussion
    Group
    Mark's Picks for Turner Classic Movies in December
    (comments by Mark R. Leeper)
    Completist Actors (comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)
    THE GLASS BOX by J. Michael Straczynski (book review
    by Joe Karpierz)
    Science News (comments by Greg Frederick)
    This Week's Reading (Greek dramatists)
    (book comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)

    ===================================================================

    TOPIC: Middletown (NJ) Public Library Science Fiction Discussion
    Group

    The only local meetings left are in Middletown, and they are
    in-person. The best way to get the latest information is to be on
    the mailing list for it.

    Dec 7, 2023, SLEEPER (1973) & novel "The Sleeper Awakes"
    by H. G. Wells
    <https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/12163>
    Jan 4, 2024 ARRIVAL (2016) & "Story of Your Life" by Ted Chiang
    <https://tinyurl.com/Chiang-StoryOfLife>

    ===================================================================

    TOPIC: Mark's Picks for Turner Classic Movies in November (comments
    by Mark R. Leeper)

    A DOG OF FLANDERS is the best little-known film of the month. Here
    is what I said back in 2009:

    CAPSULE: A rare but truly fine family film has finally made it to
    DVD. A Flemish boy is held back from his dream of becoming an
    artist by his extreme poverty. But then he makes two friends. He
    finds a dog, beaten and abandoned, and adopts the dog even less
    fortunate than him. But more important is the relationship he
    forms with the artist in town who tries to teach the boy the
    meaning of being an artist. The story has been adapted to silent
    films and to Japanese anime, but a standout performance by Theodore
    Bikel makes this the best of the three sound and live-action
    adaptations. This film is a personal favorite of mine. Rating:
    +3 (-4 to +4) or 9/10

    One of the great double features of my youth was 20th Century Fox's
    pairing of JOURNEY TO THE CENTER OF THE EARTH with James B. Clark's
    A DOG OF FLANDERS. I came away liking the co-feature as much as
    the film I had gone to see. (Okay, almost as much, but I was a
    *real* science fiction fan.) Over the years I have looked several
    times to find it on video. It was available only on a rare VHS
    tape. Finally it has been released to DVD, digitally re-mastered,
    and I could not be more pleased.

    So why would a film that outwardly looks like it is just a boy-and-
    his-dog story set in Belgium be such a find? First of all, the dog
    story is just a sub-plot. The film is more about the struggles of
    an impoverished boy to dedicate his life to creating art. But
    there is something more about it that is very unusual. It is
    honest in a way that very few family films ever are. Life is very
    hard for its main character and the film does not pull its punches.

    This film is not sugarcoated. (Admittedly the ending is not as
    grim as the ending of the book.) There are themes in this film of
    cruelty, of loss, but also of love and of the redemptive power of
    art. Does that sound like a lot to put into a single film, a
    family film? It is there and it all works.

    Nello Daas (played by David Ladd, son of Alan Ladd) lives with his
    grandfather (Donald Crisp), the town milk deliveryman in a Belgian
    town. Nello's one obsession is art. He is fascinated by the local
    painter Piet van Gelder (played by the wonderful Theodore Bikel).
    The boy has tried doing his own art using what little he has--
    iodine and charcoal, which are far from ideal materials. Nello
    knows that there is supposed to be a magnificent painting in the
    local cathedral, a work of Peter Paul Rubens, but the painting is
    behind a curtain and the cathedral charges a franc to see the
    painting. Grandfather knows how unlikely it is that Nello could be
    a successful artist and has planned a very different career for his
    grandson. One day Nello and his grandfather find a dog that had
    pulled a cart, but is now collapsed from overwork and mistreatment.

    Nello adopts the dog in spite of the fact that he and his
    grandfather barely have enough food to keep themselves alive. But
    the heart of the film is in the relationship that Nello forms with
    the self-doubting artist van Gelder.

    This is a classic and one of the best family films every made. It
    is moving and says a very great deal about life and about art.
    Some major changes were made from the original story, but it does
    not tell children that life is never hard. I rate the 1960 version
    of A DOG OF FLANDERS a +3 on the -4 to +4 scale or 9/10.

    Though never said, the town is really the City of Antwerp and the
    cathedral is the Cathedral of Our Lady. The great Rubens painting
    the boy wants to see is Rubens's The Elevation of the Cross:

    <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Peter_Paul_Rubens_068.jpg>

    We see the actual city, cathedral, and painting in the film.

    The title dog, named in the film Patrasche, is played by Spike, who
    also played the title role in OLD YELLER. The screenplay was
    written by Ted Sherdeman who co-wrote the screenplay for another
    famous animal film, THEM!

    Film Credits: <http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0052745>

    [A DOG OF FLANDERS (1935), Tuesday, December 12, 6:00 AM]

    [-mrl]

    And some comments on some other films:

    CLOUDS OVER EUROPE (1939): Also known as Q PLANES, it involves
    experimental aircraft. Mark wrote in 2016: "Okay, you 1960s spy
    film fans, TCM is running something like a James Bond film crossed
    with a 1960s Avengers story. (I am talking about the Avengers
    John Steed and Emma Peel, not Marvel Comics.) 1939's CLOUDS OVER
    EUROPE, a.k.a. Q PLANES, looks like it bears the same relation to
    James Bond films that FORBIDDEN PLANET bears to "Star Trek"."

    TEVYA (1939): The original non-musical version of Sholem Aleichem's
    stories of Tevya the Dairyman, later made into FIDDLER ON THE ROOF.
    It was thought lost until 1978.

    FLIPPER (1963) and FLIPPER'S NEW ADVENTURE (1964): Perhaps
    marginally science fiction.

    NETWORK (1976): This seems more and more like reality these days.

    TOPPER (1937): Based on a Thorne Smith novel. These days drunk
    driving is not usually a subject for comedy.

    THE GREAT RUPERT (1950): An early George Pal "Puppetoons" film.

    LADY IN THE LAKE (1947): In keeping with my Raymond Chandler
    reviews, I'll mention this one, shot entirely from the point of
    view of Philip Marlowe.

    SEANCE ON A WET AFTERNOON (1964): Remade in 2000 by Kiyoshi
    Kurosawa as SEANCE.

    [-ecl]

    Other films of interest include:

    FRIDAY, December 1
    2:30 PM Arsenic and Old Lace (1944)

    SATURDAY, December 2
    4:30 PM A Christmas Carol (1938)

    MONDAY, December 4
    8:00 PM Cabin in the Sky (1943)

    WEDNESDAY, December 6
    7:30 AM Clouds over Europe (1939)

    FRIDAY, December 8
    9:00 AM Blithe Spirit (1945)

    SATURDAY, December 9
    2:00 PM The Night of the Hunter (1955)
    11:15 PM Tevya (1939)

    SUNDAY, December 10
    2:30 AM Chimes at Midnight (1967)
    1:45 PM The Man Who Knew Too Much (1956)
    10:00 PM Bananas (1971)

    TUESDAY, December 12
    9:00 AM Flipper (1963)
    10:45 AM Flipper's New Adventure (1964)

    WEDNESDAY, December 13
    8:00 PM Network (1976)

    THURSDAY, December 14
    2:30 AM Altered States (1980)
    4:30 AM Z Channel: A Magnificent Obsession (2004)
    12:00 PM Sinbad the Sailor (1947)
    2:15 PM Treasure Island (1934)

    FRIDAY, December 15
    11:45 AM On Borrowed Time (1939)

    SATURDAY, December 16
    12:00 AM Topper (1937)
    2:00 AM Suspicion (1941)
    4:00 AM North by Northwest (1959)
    11:30 AM Star in the Night (1945)

    SATURDAY, December 16
    8:00 AM Alias St. Nick (1935)
    8:00 PM The Great Train Robbery (1979)

    SUNDAY, December 17
    1:30 PM King of Kings (1961)

    MONDAY, December 18
    1:15 AM Ben-Hur: A Tale of the Christ (1925)

    MONDAY, December 18
    5:00 PM The Great Rupert (1950)
    6:45 PM A Christmas Carol (1938)

    TUESDAY, December 19
    2:00 AM The Curse of the Cat People (1944)
    5:45 AM Star in the Night (1945)

    THURSDAY, December 21
    1:30 AM Lady in the Lake (1947)

    THURSDAY, December 21
    8:30 AM The Curse of the Cat People (1944)
    10:00 AM The Rocking Horse Winner (1949)

    FRIDAY, December 22
    4:30 AM Beyond Tomorrow (1940)
    2:00 PM A Carol for Another Christmas (1964)
    5:30 PM The Lion in Winter (1968)

    SUNDAY, December 24
    7:30 AM Beyond Tomorrow (1940)
    9:00 AM The Great Rupert (1950)
    11:45 PM A Christmas Carol (1938)

    MONDAY, December 25
    8:00 PM Vertigo (1958)
    10:15 PM Rear Window (1954)

    TUESDAY, December 26
    12:15 AM The Man Who Knew Too Much (1956)
    2:30 AM Rope (1948)
    4:00 AM Strangers on a Train (1951)

    WEDNESDAY, December 27
    8:00 AM East of Eden (1955)
    10:00 AM Cat on a Hot Tin Roof (1958)
    12:00 PM Dial M for Murder (1954)
    5:45 PM A Streetcar Named Desire (1951)
    11:00 PM The Body Disappears (1941)

    THURSDAY, December 28
    12:30 AM The Invisible Boy (1957)
    3:45 PM Wait Until Dark (1967)
    5:45 PM Seance on a Wet Afternoon (1964)

    FRIDAY, December 29
    4:15 AM Blow-Up (1966)
    8:00 AM The Most Dangerous Game (1932)
    9:30 AM Rudyard Kipling's Jungle Book (1942)

    SATURDAY, December 30
    2:00 PM Five Million Years to Earth (1968)
    4:00 PM The Birds (1963)

    ===================================================================

    TOPIC: Completist Actors (comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)

    Yes, David Suchet played Hercule Poirot in all the Agatha Christie
    "Poirot" stories (with a bit of fudging on the stories from THE
    LABOURS OF HERCULES). But Clive Merrison played Sherlock Holmes in
    all 64 of the Doyle stories, as well as another 16 original
    stories. The fact that Poirot was on television, and the Holmes on
    the radio probably had something to do with this. However,
    Merrison was also in a Sherlock Holmes adaptation on television, as Bartholomew Sholto in the 1983 British "The Sign of Four".
    (Michael Williams played Watson in all the radio Doyle stories as
    well, though not in the original ones that followed.) [-ecl]

    ===================================================================

    TOPIC: THE GLASS BOX by J. Michael Straczynski (copyright 2024
    (January 9,2024), Blackstone Publishing, 350p., ISBN-13:
    979-8212007795 (hardcover edition), ASIN: B0CD9PJNNY (Kindle
    edition)) (book review by Joe Karpierz)

    The Wikipedia entry for J. Michael Straczynski says that he is a
    film maker and a comic book writer. While he is certainly a film
    maker, and a good one at that, I feel that comic book writer is too
    limiting a term. He has written for a significant amount of
    television series and movies, as well as the aforementioned comic
    books. In fact, I would say that he is an "writer", with many
    credits to his name. JMS, as he is known (and I will refer to him
    here as that since it's a lot easier than typing out Straczynski),
    is probably best known for writing *92* of the 110 episodes of the
    science fiction television show "Babylon 5". But I would suggest
    that even though he is mainly known for writing genre works, he has
    a talent for writing books that are not genre, such as the novel
    TOGETHER WE WILL GO and the autobiography BECOMING SUPERMAN. His
    latest novel is THE GLASS BOX, and while it may be marketed as
    science fiction, I don't think it's sf at all. In fact, I'm not
    convinced that it's completely fiction.

    Riley Diaz is a resistance fighter, raised by her parents to
    question authority and not be quiet about it. You might almost call
    her a professional protester. She works with an organized group of
    protesters who know what they're getting into every time they step
    out on the front line. If they are not careful, they will be
    arrested even if their protests are lawful. She views the
    government as something that is not to be trusted, and the
    government has pretty much earned that lack of trust. The powers
    that be are cracking down on the freedoms that all citizens have
    become accustomed to, but especially the freedom to gather
    peacefully in public. And this rankles Diaz and her colleagues to
    no end.

    At the latest protest, Diaz is arrested and taken to one of the
    many American Renewal Centers (ARCs) for what amounts to mandatory reeducation. And getting into an ARC was part of the plan, as the
    idea was to get inside and find out exactly what is going on at the
    shadowy ARCs. What she didn't count on was not being able to get
    out once she was in there. The "patients", if you will, are
    incarcerated for six months, and, based on a points system that no
    one but the people who run the ARCs knows, could be let out early
    or detained for a longer period of time. Diaz, the freedom fighter
    that she is, doesn't give in to the system. She resists the
    authorities there, and her fellow patients don't trust her very
    much. In fact, with all of them wishing to get out and at the same
    time facing a "if one of you does something bad, you're all going
    to suffer" situation, they shun Diaz at first. Slowly but surely,
    by her actions, her fellow inmates (lets call them what they really
    are) begin to trust her and work with her to fight the system and
    hopefully eventually find a way out. Diaz also finds an unlikely
    ally in the form of a character nicknamed Frankenstein. She is the
    only person there able to break through to him, and they form a
    bond that is touching and heartfelt. As you might expect,
    Frankenstein becomes important to the plan for breaking out of the
    ARC Diaz is in.

    What's frightening about THE GLASS BOX is that it's easy to see
    that this sort of thing could happen today. A government that is
    interested in staying in power, invoking a decades old law, and
    doing everything it can to put down and silence protesters, is
    something that should terrify everyone, whether here in the U.S. or
    anywhere around the world. THE GLASS BOX portrays a very real and
    scary scenario, where it takes courage, persistence, and valor to
    fight back and beat the system. I found myself rooting for Diaz as
    the novel went on, as it became clear that there were very sinister
    things going on all the way up to the top.

    THE GLASS BOX is a thriller, a great read, and a frightening and
    thought provoking look at what a government could become if it is
    not held in check. I feel as if JMS was writing with some
    insider's knowledge, and he does a terrific job from beginning to
    end in the novel. While he may have made his name in other areas
    of entertainment, such as television, movies, and comic books, I
    believe that he is growing stronger as a novel writer. I eagerly
    look forward to his next novel. [-jak]

    ===================================================================

    TOPIC: Science News (comments by Greg Frederick)

    The supermassive black hole of M87--also known as M87*--has a mass
    equal to around 6.5 billion suns. It especially came to the
    public's attention in 2019 when an image of M87*, captured by the
    Event Horizon Telescope (EHT)

    Two years after the release of the image of the supermassive black
    hole in M87, in 2021, the EHT Collaboration released a second
    stunning look. The newer image showed, for the very first time,
    polarized light around a black hole. (Polarized light has a
    different orientation and brightness than unpolarized light.) The
    2021 data also revealed the direction of oscillating (vibrating)
    electric fields, providing the first hint that magnetic fields
    around M87* are strong and ordered.

    See the image at
    <https://www.space.com/first-black-hole-image-polarized-m87>

    SpaceX had it's second test launch yesterday; all 33 booster
    engines did fire continuously and the hot stage separation was
    really good but yes the booster blew up and the Starship was
    eventually lost…..some successes but new problems too. But with
    each launch they learn and improve the rocket.

    SpaceX’s gargantuan deep-space rocket system, Starship, safely
    lifted off Saturday morning but ended prematurely with an explosion
    and a loss of signal:

    "The Super Heavy booster and Starship spacecraft successfully
    separated after liftoff, as the Starship lit up its engines and
    pushed away. That process ended up destroying the Super Heavy
    booster, which erupted into a ball of flames over the Gulf of
    Mexico. But the Starship spacecraft was able to briefly continue
    its journey.

    The Starship system made it much farther into flight than the first
    attempt in April. The rocket and spacecraft lifted off the
    launchpad at 8 a.m. ET, with the Super Heavy booster igniting all
    33 of its Raptor engines. Even during ground tests, SpaceX has had
    a hard time getting all of those engines, clustered together at the
    base of the rocket, to power on consistently at the same time."

    More at
    <https://www.yahoo.com/news/spacex-loses-rocket-spacecraft-over- 142845952.html>. [-gf]

    ===================================================================

    TOPIC: This Week's Reading (book comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)

    On a recent podcast discussing THE FROGS by Aristophanes, one of
    the podcasters asked the others if any of them had read any of the
    other dramatists named in THE FROGS besides Aeschylus, Sophocles,
    and Euripides. I noted that if they had, they should alert the
    media, because those three are the only ancient Greek tragedians
    who have any plays that have survived intact.

    I have been reading a couple of books about ancient historians and
    histories, and discovered that what we have of Ammianus and of
    Tacitus' ANNALS are each due to the survival of a single
    manuscript--well, in Tacitus' case, two non-overlapping
    manuscripts, and we still lost some of his work. Those manuscripts
    can join that of BEOWULF in the "sole survivor" category. So it
    isn't that surprising that Greek dramatists as a whole fared worse.
    Of three hundred or so known tragedies, only about thirty have
    survived intact. And all are by the "Big Three".

    Why? First, Attic Greek (500 B.C.E. - 300 B.C.E.) never had the
    audience Latin did, or even Koine Greek (300 B.C.E. - 600 C.E.).
    Second, at the time, manuscripts of plays were not distributed as
    widely as works of history, philosophy, or science. And later
    copyists added works of theology to what they were prioritizing.
    The copyists were busy copying Plato and Aristotle, and the New
    Testament, and Herodotus and Thucydides (with a side of Xenophon),
    and why copy pagan dramas anyway? So one could conclude that
    (e.g.) the seven surviving Sophocles plays were the best (by some
    metric) of the hundred and twenty that he wrote. Again, I don't
    think any of the thirty surviving plays had only a sole surviving
    manuscript (at least I've never heard this).

    (All this is my theory; I could be totally off.)

    Oh, and of the comedies, the only ones surviving are all by
    Aristophanes.

    What if 2300 years from now, all that remains of 20th century
    English-language drama are seven plays of Andrew Lloyd Webber
    (words only, no music), six plays of Tennessee Williams, and
    eighteen plays of Eugene O'Neill? [-ecl]

    ===================================================================

    Mark Leeper
    mleeper@optonline.net


    There's nothing wrong with being shallow as long as
    you're insightful about it.
    --Dennis Miller

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)