• Re: [OT] Gun Company Owns the Libs!

    From Jay E. Morris@21:1/5 to Scott Lurndal on Wed Feb 1 13:06:37 2023
    On 2/1/2023 11:51 AM, Scott Lurndal wrote:
    "Jay E. Morris" <morrisj@epsilon3.comcon> writes:
    On 2/1/2023 9:36 AM, Scott Lurndal wrote:
    I said:
    .....Second, AR-15 platform .22 rifles have been around for a long time. >>> Which statement felt disingenuous to me at the time. The vast
    majority of the public identifies a '.22' rifle with the .22LR (or short) >>> round.

    Other than the diameter of the slug, there is very little in common
    between the .223 and the .22LR, or the weapons that use them.

    Maybe it was. The public also thinks of the .223 (or 5.56) as some huge,
    instantaneous death dealing round, not the light-weight it is in
    reality. (Which is why the Army is switching to the 6.8mm.}

    In several states the .223 can't be use for large game.

    In the county that I grew up in, rifles weren't allowed for
    hunting any large game (other than varmints); the deer and bear
    hunters used 12 or 16g deer slugs. The restrictions were
    primary for hunter safety due to the terrain and other factors.

    I believe that those restrictions have been relaxed or removed
    subsequently as the state has slid further to the right and
    the heston era NRA moved away from a hunters organization to
    a bunch of crazy fuckers.



    Transplanted Texan, grew up in rural Indiana, and it was much the same
    there. Shoutgun slug only for the same reason and because we didn't
    generally have miles of open land for the miss to land on. You would
    think that heavily forested land would count. Now, pistol caliber rifles
    are now allowed, of which (talking to friends) .44 mag lever action
    seems to be most popular, then .357. I doubt anyone is using .38 or 9mm.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jay E. Morris@21:1/5 to All on Wed Feb 1 13:42:28 2023
    Sorry about that. Somehow flipped my .written reply to .fandom

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tim Merrigan@21:1/5 to morrisj@epsilon3.comcon on Wed Feb 1 14:51:20 2023
    On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 13:06:37 -0600, "Jay E. Morris"
    <morrisj@epsilon3.comcon> wrote:

    On 2/1/2023 11:51 AM, Scott Lurndal wrote:
    "Jay E. Morris" <morrisj@epsilon3.comcon> writes:
    On 2/1/2023 9:36 AM, Scott Lurndal wrote:
    I said:
    .....Second, AR-15 platform .22 rifles have been around for a long time. >>>> Which statement felt disingenuous to me at the time. The vast
    majority of the public identifies a '.22' rifle with the .22LR (or short) >>>> round.

    Other than the diameter of the slug, there is very little in common
    between the .223 and the .22LR, or the weapons that use them.

    Maybe it was. The public also thinks of the .223 (or 5.56) as some huge, >>> instantaneous death dealing round, not the light-weight it is in
    reality. (Which is why the Army is switching to the 6.8mm.}

    In several states the .223 can't be use for large game.

    In the county that I grew up in, rifles weren't allowed for
    hunting any large game (other than varmints); the deer and bear
    hunters used 12 or 16g deer slugs. The restrictions were
    primary for hunter safety due to the terrain and other factors.

    I believe that those restrictions have been relaxed or removed
    subsequently as the state has slid further to the right and
    the heston era NRA moved away from a hunters organization to
    a bunch of crazy fuckers.



    Transplanted Texan, grew up in rural Indiana, and it was much the same
    there. Shoutgun slug only for the same reason and because we didn't
    generally have miles of open land for the miss to land on. You would
    think that heavily forested land would count. Now, pistol caliber rifles
    are now allowed, of which (talking to friends) .44 mag lever action
    seems to be most popular, then .357. I doubt anyone is using .38 or 9mm.

    My father was a regular hunter, and tended to use a 30.06 or a 30 30,
    either bolt or lever action. Usually converted WWII and earlier
    military rifles. Note: This was in California, most hunting areas
    are mountainous. I never heard of anyone using shotgun slugs (AKA
    canons) for hunting, shotguns, with shot, are reserved for birds (and
    skeet).
    --

    Qualified immunity = virtual impunity.

    Tim Merrigan

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jay E. Morris@21:1/5 to Tim Merrigan on Wed Feb 1 17:21:14 2023
    On 2/1/2023 4:51 PM, Tim Merrigan wrote:
    On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 13:06:37 -0600, "Jay E. Morris"
    <morrisj@epsilon3.comcon> wrote:

    On 2/1/2023 11:51 AM, Scott Lurndal wrote:
    "Jay E. Morris" <morrisj@epsilon3.comcon> writes:
    On 2/1/2023 9:36 AM, Scott Lurndal wrote:
    I said:
    .....Second, AR-15 platform .22 rifles have been around for a long time. >>>>> Which statement felt disingenuous to me at the time. The vast
    majority of the public identifies a '.22' rifle with the .22LR (or short) >>>>> round.

    Other than the diameter of the slug, there is very little in common
    between the .223 and the .22LR, or the weapons that use them.

    Maybe it was. The public also thinks of the .223 (or 5.56) as some huge, >>>> instantaneous death dealing round, not the light-weight it is in
    reality. (Which is why the Army is switching to the 6.8mm.}

    In several states the .223 can't be use for large game.

    In the county that I grew up in, rifles weren't allowed for
    hunting any large game (other than varmints); the deer and bear
    hunters used 12 or 16g deer slugs. The restrictions were
    primary for hunter safety due to the terrain and other factors.

    I believe that those restrictions have been relaxed or removed
    subsequently as the state has slid further to the right and
    the heston era NRA moved away from a hunters organization to
    a bunch of crazy fuckers.



    Transplanted Texan, grew up in rural Indiana, and it was much the same
    there. Shoutgun slug only for the same reason and because we didn't
    generally have miles of open land for the miss to land on. You would
    think that heavily forested land would count. Now, pistol caliber rifles
    are now allowed, of which (talking to friends) .44 mag lever action
    seems to be most popular, then .357. I doubt anyone is using .38 or 9mm.

    My father was a regular hunter, and tended to use a 30.06 or a 30 30,
    either bolt or lever action. Usually converted WWII and earlier
    military rifles. Note: This was in California, most hunting areas
    are mountainous. I never heard of anyone using shotgun slugs (AKA
    canons) for hunting, shotguns, with shot, are reserved for birds (and
    skeet).

    Common in areas without a lot of wide open spaces or very large piles of
    dirt and stone to stop high-power rifle rounds. As I said above, it was required in Indiana until 2017. And I just got word back that the pistol caliber is only for public land. Private land is anything above .243/6mm.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shotgun_slug

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)