• Question for British fans

    From Keith F. Lynch@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 20 00:41:08 2023
    I know what a libertarian is, but what is a "right-libertarian"?
    The latter term was used by a British person. Thanks.
    --
    Keith F. Lynch - http://keithlynch.net/
    Please see http://keithlynch.net/email.html before emailing me.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Dallman@21:1/5 to Lynch on Fri Jan 20 02:40:00 2023
    In article <tqcnv4$jld$1@reader2.panix.com>, kfl@KeithLynch.net (Keith F. Lynch) wrote:

    I know what a libertarian is, but what is a "right-libertarian"?
    The latter term was used by a British person. Thanks.

    In British usage, there are left-libertarians and right-libertarians.

    Right-libertarians are somewhat like US libertarians, but tend to feel
    they have a right to do whatever they like on social class grounds.

    Left-libertarians are much less interested in the rather absolute view of property and economic freedom that seems common with right- libertarians. They're much more interested in freedom of speech, thought and identity.

    --
    John Dallman
    "This isn't a supernova problem. It's a pointy-haired boss problem."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Kerr-Mudd, John@21:1/5 to Keith F. Lynch on Fri Jan 20 10:30:09 2023
    On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 00:41:08 -0000 (UTC)
    "Keith F. Lynch" <kfl@KeithLynch.net> wrote:

    I know what a libertarian is, but what is a "right-libertarian"?
    The latter term was used by a British person. Thanks.

    My usenet feed must be slow, this has only just cropped up here despite it
    been discussed for the past week on uae.

    --
    Bah, and indeed Humbug.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gary McGath@21:1/5 to John Dallman on Fri Jan 20 09:12:14 2023
    On 1/19/23 9:40 PM, John Dallman wrote:
    In article <tqcnv4$jld$1@reader2.panix.com>, kfl@KeithLynch.net (Keith F. Lynch) wrote:

    I know what a libertarian is, but what is a "right-libertarian"?
    The latter term was used by a British person. Thanks.

    In British usage, there are left-libertarians and right-libertarians.

    Right-libertarians are somewhat like US libertarians, but tend to feel
    they have a right to do whatever they like on social class grounds.

    Left-libertarians are much less interested in the rather absolute view of property and economic freedom that seems common with right- libertarians. They're much more interested in freedom of speech, thought and identity.

    The terms have also shown up in US discussion. They're indicators more
    of style and alliances than of content. In the US, left libertarians are
    more likely to stress civil liberties issues and form alliances with left-leaning organizations like the ACLU. Right libertarians stress
    economic issues; the Mises Institute is a prime example.

    --
    Gary McGath http://www.mcgath.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Keith F. Lynch@21:1/5 to John on Fri Jan 20 15:57:57 2023
    Kerr-Mudd, John <admin@127.0.0.1> wrote:
    My usenet feed must be slow, this has only just cropped up here
    despite it been discussed for the past week on uae.

    No, I started a new thread, as I wanted a second opinion.
    --
    Keith F. Lynch - http://keithlynch.net/
    Please see http://keithlynch.net/email.html before emailing me.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tim Merrigan@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 20 13:53:11 2023
    On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 09:12:14 -0500, Gary McGath <garym@mcgath.com>
    wrote:

    On 1/19/23 9:40 PM, John Dallman wrote:
    In article <tqcnv4$jld$1@reader2.panix.com>, kfl@KeithLynch.net (Keith F.
    Lynch) wrote:

    I know what a libertarian is, but what is a "right-libertarian"?
    The latter term was used by a British person. Thanks.

    In British usage, there are left-libertarians and right-libertarians.

    Right-libertarians are somewhat like US libertarians, but tend to feel
    they have a right to do whatever they like on social class grounds.

    Left-libertarians are much less interested in the rather absolute view of
    property and economic freedom that seems common with right- libertarians.
    They're much more interested in freedom of speech, thought and identity.

    The terms have also shown up in US discussion. They're indicators more
    of style and alliances than of content. In the US, left libertarians are
    more likely to stress civil liberties issues and form alliances with >left-leaning organizations like the ACLU. Right libertarians stress
    economic issues; the Mises Institute is a prime example.


    Not British, born and raised in SoCal.

    I was originally drawn to the libertarian movement (even the LP for a
    while) by the civil liberties planks of their platform, then chased
    away by the propertarian planks.

    Since 1980, after Reagan implemented some Libertarian planks, I
    identified as socialist.
    --

    Qualified immunity = virtual impunity.

    Tim Merrigan

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Keith F. Lynch@21:1/5 to Tim Merrigan on Sat Jan 21 18:09:09 2023
    Tim Merrigan <tppm@ca.rr.com> wrote:
    Not British, born and raised in SoCal.

    I was originally drawn to the libertarian movement (even the LP
    for a while) by the civil liberties planks of their platform,
    then chased away by the propertarian planks.

    What's wrong with the right to property? Most people trade much of
    their life for stuff, hence don't want it taken away.

    To me, the central libertarian idea is that everything is okay
    if it's between consenting adults, whether it's in a bedroom, a
    boardroom, or anywhere else. I don't see libertarianism as left or
    right, but as being orthogonal to that political axis. The opposite
    of libertarianism is authoritarianism, which is also neither left
    nor right.

    Since 1980, after Reagan implemented some Libertarian planks, I
    identified as socialist.

    So you're an authoritarian? Not all authoritarian governments are
    socialist, but all socialist governments are authoritarian.
    --
    Keith F. Lynch - http://keithlynch.net/
    Please see http://keithlynch.net/email.html before emailing me.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jay E. Morris@21:1/5 to Keith F. Lynch on Sat Jan 21 16:14:16 2023
    On 1/19/2023 6:41 PM, Keith F. Lynch wrote:
    I know what a libertarian is, but what is a "right-libertarian"?
    The latter term was used by a British person. Thanks.

    From what I've been reading it seems there is no pure libertarian, it's right-, left-, and other flavors.

    Right-libertarian from Wiki.

    Right-libertarianism, also known as libertarian capitalism or right-wing libertarianism, is a libertarian political philosophy that supports
    capitalist property rights and defends market distribution of natural
    resources and private property. The term right-libertarianism is used to distinguish this class of views on the nature of property and capital
    from left-libertarianism, a type of libertarianism that combines
    self-ownership with an egalitarian approach to natural resources. In
    contrast to socialist libertarianism, right-libertarianism supports
    free-market capitalism, Like most forms of libertarianism, it supports
    civil liberties, especially natural law, negative rights, the
    non-aggression principle, and a major reversal of the modern welfare state.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-libertarianism

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gary McGath@21:1/5 to Jay E. Morris on Sun Jan 22 09:31:48 2023
    On 1/21/23 5:14 PM, Jay E. Morris wrote:
    On 1/19/2023 6:41 PM, Keith F. Lynch wrote:
    I know what a libertarian is, but what is a "right-libertarian"?
    The latter term was used by a British person.  Thanks.

    From what I've been reading it seems there is no pure libertarian, it's right-, left-, and other flavors.

    Right-libertarian from Wiki.

    Right-libertarianism, also known as libertarian capitalism or right-wing libertarianism, is a libertarian political philosophy that supports capitalist property rights and defends market distribution of natural resources and private property. The term right-libertarianism is used to distinguish this class of views on the nature of property and capital
    from left-libertarianism, a type of libertarianism that combines self-ownership with an egalitarian approach to natural resources. In
    contrast to socialist libertarianism, right-libertarianism supports free-market capitalism, Like most forms of libertarianism, it supports
    civil liberties, especially natural law, negative rights, the
    non-aggression principle, and a major reversal of the modern welfare state.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-libertarianism

    Whatever Wikipedia might say, "socialist libertarianism" is an
    incoherent concept. Without property rights, your existence is at the
    mercy of the allocating authority, be it a workers' collective or a
    central government. "Self-ownership" is meaningless without any right to
    keep what you produce.
    --
    Gary McGath http://www.mcgath.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Charles Packer@21:1/5 to Gary McGath on Tue Jan 24 07:59:50 2023
    On Sun, 22 Jan 2023 09:31:48 -0500, Gary McGath wrote:

    On 1/21/23 5:14 PM, Jay E. Morris wrote:
    On 1/19/2023 6:41 PM, Keith F. Lynch wrote:
    I know what a libertarian is, but what is a "right-libertarian"?
    The latter term was used by a British person.  Thanks.

    From what I've been reading it seems there is no pure libertarian,
    it's
    right-, left-, and other flavors.

    Right-libertarian from Wiki.

    Right-libertarianism, also known as libertarian capitalism or
    right-wing libertarianism, is a libertarian political philosophy that
    supports capitalist property rights and defends market distribution of
    natural resources and private property. The term right-libertarianism
    is used to distinguish this class of views on the nature of property
    and capital from left-libertarianism, a type of libertarianism that
    combines self-ownership with an egalitarian approach to natural
    resources. In contrast to socialist libertarianism,
    right-libertarianism supports free-market capitalism, Like most forms
    of libertarianism, it supports civil liberties, especially natural law,
    negative rights, the non-aggression principle, and a major reversal of
    the modern welfare state.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-libertarianism

    Whatever Wikipedia might say, "socialist libertarianism" is an
    incoherent concept. Without property rights, your existence is at the
    mercy of the allocating authority, be it a workers' collective or a
    central government. "Self-ownership" is meaningless without any right to
    keep what you produce.


    One could go further and elevate the idea of ownership to being the
    central concept of liberalism. The social contract can be seen as
    a proprietary affair, with the vote representing a share of
    ownership of the collective. Historically, the joint stock
    company was invented around the time of the Mayflower Compact.
    If government were seen as an enterprise in which every citizen
    has a proprietary interest, political divisiveness would be
    converted into a rational process of finding optimal solutions
    for making government run smoothly. This is analogous to all
    shareholders wanting a company to operate so as to maximize
    return on investment.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Kevrob@21:1/5 to Gary McGath on Fri Jan 27 18:17:45 2023
    On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 9:31:51 AM UTC-5, Gary McGath wrote:
    On 1/21/23 5:14 PM, Jay E. Morris wrote:
    On 1/19/2023 6:41 PM, Keith F. Lynch wrote:
    I know what a libertarian is, but what is a "right-libertarian"?
    The latter term was used by a British person. Thanks.

    From what I've been reading it seems there is no pure libertarian, it's right-, left-, and other flavors.

    Right-libertarian from Wiki.

    Right-libertarianism, also known as libertarian capitalism or right-wing libertarianism, is a libertarian political philosophy that supports capitalist property rights and defends market distribution of natural resources and private property. The term right-libertarianism is used to distinguish this class of views on the nature of property and capital
    from left-libertarianism, a type of libertarianism that combines self-ownership with an egalitarian approach to natural resources. In contrast to socialist libertarianism, right-libertarianism supports free-market capitalism, Like most forms of libertarianism, it supports civil liberties, especially natural law, negative rights, the non-aggression principle, and a major reversal of the modern welfare state.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-libertarianism
    Whatever Wikipedia might say, "socialist libertarianism" is an
    incoherent concept. Without property rights, your existence is at the
    mercy of the allocating authority, be it a workers' collective or a
    central government. "Self-ownership" is meaningless without any right to
    keep what you produce.
    --
    Gary McGath http://www.mcgath.com

    After the European revolutions of 1848, anarchists {who modern libertarians might denote as "left anarchists," to distinguish them from "propertarian anarchists") used the libertarian label, because the Old Regimes' polizei would bang up anybody explicitly espousing anarchism.

    An appreciation of the tangled roots of anarchism, socialism and libertarianism....

    https://www.libertarianism.org/columns/anarchism-libertarianism-two-sides-same-coin

    ...for anyone with the time to read it.

    --
    Kevin R

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Peter Trei@21:1/5 to Charles Packer on Sat Jan 28 13:35:58 2023
    On Tuesday, January 24, 2023 at 2:59:53 AM UTC-5, Charles Packer wrote:
    On Sun, 22 Jan 2023 09:31:48 -0500, Gary McGath wrote:

    On 1/21/23 5:14 PM, Jay E. Morris wrote:
    On 1/19/2023 6:41 PM, Keith F. Lynch wrote:
    I know what a libertarian is, but what is a "right-libertarian"?
    The latter term was used by a British person. Thanks.

    From what I've been reading it seems there is no pure libertarian,
    it's
    right-, left-, and other flavors.

    Right-libertarian from Wiki.

    Right-libertarianism, also known as libertarian capitalism or
    right-wing libertarianism, is a libertarian political philosophy that
    supports capitalist property rights and defends market distribution of
    natural resources and private property. The term right-libertarianism
    is used to distinguish this class of views on the nature of property
    and capital from left-libertarianism, a type of libertarianism that
    combines self-ownership with an egalitarian approach to natural
    resources. In contrast to socialist libertarianism,
    right-libertarianism supports free-market capitalism, Like most forms
    of libertarianism, it supports civil liberties, especially natural law,
    negative rights, the non-aggression principle, and a major reversal of
    the modern welfare state.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-libertarianism

    Whatever Wikipedia might say, "socialist libertarianism" is an
    incoherent concept. Without property rights, your existence is at the
    mercy of the allocating authority, be it a workers' collective or a
    central government. "Self-ownership" is meaningless without any right to keep what you produce.
    One could go further and elevate the idea of ownership to being the
    central concept of liberalism. The social contract can be seen as
    a proprietary affair, with the vote representing a share of
    ownership of the collective. Historically, the joint stock
    company was invented around the time of the Mayflower Compact.
    If government were seen as an enterprise in which every citizen
    has a proprietary interest, political divisiveness would be
    converted into a rational process of finding optimal solutions
    for making government run smoothly. This is analogous to all
    shareholders wanting a company to operate so as to maximize
    return on investment.

    You've never run into an "activist shareholder", I take it.

    Not everyone regards financial ROI as the sole goal of a
    joint stock company. Even fewer agree on the goals a nation
    should pursue.

    Pt

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ninapenda Jibini@21:1/5 to Peter Trei on Sun Jan 29 00:44:25 2023
    Peter Trei <petertrei@gmail.com> wrote in news:180e62b7-cdfc-4bdf-9a51-1d37489b8a0dn@googlegroups.com:

    On Tuesday, January 24, 2023 at 2:59:53 AM UTC-5, Charles Packer
    wrote:
    On Sun, 22 Jan 2023 09:31:48 -0500, Gary McGath wrote:

    On 1/21/23 5:14 PM, Jay E. Morris wrote:
    On 1/19/2023 6:41 PM, Keith F. Lynch wrote:
    I know what a libertarian is, but what is a
    "right-libertarian"? The latter term was used by a British
    person. Thanks.

    From what I've been reading it seems there is no pure
    libertarian, it's
    right-, left-, and other flavors.

    Right-libertarian from Wiki.

    Right-libertarianism, also known as libertarian capitalism
    or right-wing libertarianism, is a libertarian political
    philosophy that supports capitalist property rights and
    defends market distribution of natural resources and private
    property. The term right-libertarianism is used to
    distinguish this class of views on the nature of property
    and capital from left-libertarianism, a type of
    libertarianism that combines self-ownership with an
    egalitarian approach to natural resources. In contrast to
    socialist libertarianism, right-libertarianism supports
    free-market capitalism, Like most forms of libertarianism,
    it supports civil liberties, especially natural law,
    negative rights, the non-aggression principle, and a major
    reversal of the modern welfare state.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-libertarianism

    Whatever Wikipedia might say, "socialist libertarianism" is
    an incoherent concept. Without property rights, your
    existence is at the mercy of the allocating authority, be it
    a workers' collective or a central government.
    "Self-ownership" is meaningless without any right to keep
    what you produce.
    One could go further and elevate the idea of ownership to being
    the central concept of liberalism. The social contract can be
    seen as a proprietary affair, with the vote representing a
    share of ownership of the collective. Historically, the joint
    stock company was invented around the time of the Mayflower
    Compact. If government were seen as an enterprise in which
    every citizen has a proprietary interest, political
    divisiveness would be converted into a rational process of
    finding optimal solutions for making government run smoothly.
    This is analogous to all shareholders wanting a company to
    operate so as to maximize return on investment.

    You've never run into an "activist shareholder", I take it.

    The other term for it is "minnority shareholder." Or "*very*
    minority shareholder." It's rare they have any real pull, other
    than convincing other shareholders to go along.

    --
    Terry Austin

    Proof that Alan Baker is a liar and a fool, and even stupider than
    Lynn:
    https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/sw-border-migration


    "Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
    -- David Bilek

    Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gary R. Schmidt@21:1/5 to Ninapenda Jibini on Sun Jan 29 21:32:12 2023
    On 29/01/2023 11:44, Ninapenda Jibini wrote:
    Peter Trei <petertrei@gmail.com> wrote in news:180e62b7-cdfc-4bdf-9a51-1d37489b8a0dn@googlegroups.com:

    On Tuesday, January 24, 2023 at 2:59:53 AM UTC-5, Charles Packer
    wrote:
    On Sun, 22 Jan 2023 09:31:48 -0500, Gary McGath wrote:

    On 1/21/23 5:14 PM, Jay E. Morris wrote:
    On 1/19/2023 6:41 PM, Keith F. Lynch wrote:
    I know what a libertarian is, but what is a
    "right-libertarian"? The latter term was used by a British
    person. Thanks.

    From what I've been reading it seems there is no pure
    libertarian, it's
    right-, left-, and other flavors.

    Right-libertarian from Wiki.

    Right-libertarianism, also known as libertarian capitalism
    or right-wing libertarianism, is a libertarian political
    philosophy that supports capitalist property rights and
    defends market distribution of natural resources and private
    property. The term right-libertarianism is used to
    distinguish this class of views on the nature of property
    and capital from left-libertarianism, a type of
    libertarianism that combines self-ownership with an
    egalitarian approach to natural resources. In contrast to
    socialist libertarianism, right-libertarianism supports
    free-market capitalism, Like most forms of libertarianism,
    it supports civil liberties, especially natural law,
    negative rights, the non-aggression principle, and a major
    reversal of the modern welfare state.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-libertarianism

    Whatever Wikipedia might say, "socialist libertarianism" is
    an incoherent concept. Without property rights, your
    existence is at the mercy of the allocating authority, be it
    a workers' collective or a central government.
    "Self-ownership" is meaningless without any right to keep
    what you produce.
    One could go further and elevate the idea of ownership to being
    the central concept of liberalism. The social contract can be
    seen as a proprietary affair, with the vote representing a
    share of ownership of the collective. Historically, the joint
    stock company was invented around the time of the Mayflower
    Compact. If government were seen as an enterprise in which
    every citizen has a proprietary interest, political
    divisiveness would be converted into a rational process of
    finding optimal solutions for making government run smoothly.
    This is analogous to all shareholders wanting a company to
    operate so as to maximize return on investment.

    You've never run into an "activist shareholder", I take it.

    The other term for it is "minnority shareholder." Or "*very*
    minority shareholder." It's rare they have any real pull, other
    than convincing other shareholders to go along.

    Here in Oz they're having quite an effect at getting the mobs that Superannuation Funds[1] like to invest in to change their behaviour.

    Cheers,
    Gary B-)

    1 - Like a Pension Fund in the USA, but often across industries, not
    just union- or whatever-controlled. And everyone in Oz who works has to
    be a member of a super fund, so they play with very, very large sums of
    money.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ninapenda Jibini@21:1/5 to Gary R. Schmidt on Sun Jan 29 18:06:34 2023
    "Gary R. Schmidt" <grschmidt@acm.org> wrote in news:aiuhaj-m1i.ln1@paranoia.mcleod-schmidt.id.au:

    On 29/01/2023 11:44, Ninapenda Jibini wrote:
    Peter Trei <petertrei@gmail.com> wrote in
    news:180e62b7-cdfc-4bdf-9a51-1d37489b8a0dn@googlegroups.com:

    On Tuesday, January 24, 2023 at 2:59:53 AM UTC-5, Charles
    Packer wrote:
    On Sun, 22 Jan 2023 09:31:48 -0500, Gary McGath wrote:

    On 1/21/23 5:14 PM, Jay E. Morris wrote:
    On 1/19/2023 6:41 PM, Keith F. Lynch wrote:
    I know what a libertarian is, but what is a
    "right-libertarian"? The latter term was used by a British
    person. Thanks.

    From what I've been reading it seems there is no pure
    libertarian, it's
    right-, left-, and other flavors.

    Right-libertarian from Wiki.

    Right-libertarianism, also known as libertarian capitalism
    or right-wing libertarianism, is a libertarian political
    philosophy that supports capitalist property rights and
    defends market distribution of natural resources and
    private property. The term right-libertarianism is used to
    distinguish this class of views on the nature of property
    and capital from left-libertarianism, a type of
    libertarianism that combines self-ownership with an
    egalitarian approach to natural resources. In contrast to
    socialist libertarianism, right-libertarianism supports
    free-market capitalism, Like most forms of libertarianism,
    it supports civil liberties, especially natural law,
    negative rights, the non-aggression principle, and a major
    reversal of the modern welfare state.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-libertarianism

    Whatever Wikipedia might say, "socialist libertarianism" is
    an incoherent concept. Without property rights, your
    existence is at the mercy of the allocating authority, be it
    a workers' collective or a central government.
    "Self-ownership" is meaningless without any right to keep
    what you produce.
    One could go further and elevate the idea of ownership to
    being the central concept of liberalism. The social contract
    can be seen as a proprietary affair, with the vote
    representing a share of ownership of the collective.
    Historically, the joint stock company was invented around the
    time of the Mayflower Compact. If government were seen as an
    enterprise in which every citizen has a proprietary interest,
    political divisiveness would be converted into a rational
    process of finding optimal solutions for making government
    run smoothly. This is analogous to all shareholders wanting a
    company to operate so as to maximize return on investment.

    You've never run into an "activist shareholder", I take it.

    The other term for it is "minnority shareholder." Or "*very*
    minority shareholder." It's rare they have any real pull, other
    than convincing other shareholders to go along.

    Here in Oz they're having quite an effect at getting the mobs
    that Superannuation Funds[1] like to invest in to change their
    behaviour.

    Cheers,
    Gary B-)

    1 - Like a Pension Fund in the USA, but often across industries,
    not just union- or whatever-controlled. And everyone in Oz who
    works has to be a member of a super fund, so they play with
    very, very large sums of money.

    Yeah, some of them are very skilled at the one thing they can do.

    --
    Terry Austin

    Proof that Alan Baker is a liar and a fool, and even stupider than
    Lynn:
    https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/sw-border-migration


    "Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
    -- David Bilek

    Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)