• MT VOID, 12/23/22 -- Vol. 41, No. 26, Whole Number 2255

    From evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Sun Dec 25 21:22:51 2022
    THE MT VOID
    12/23/22 -- Vol. 41, No. 26, Whole Number 2255

    Co-Editor: Mark Leeper, mleeper@optonline.net
    Co-Editor: Evelyn Leeper, eleeper@optonline.net
    Sending Address: evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com
    All material is the opinion of the author and is copyrighted by the
    author unless otherwise noted.
    All comments sent or posted will be assumed authorized for
    inclusion unless otherwise noted.

    To subscribe or unsubscribe, send mail to eleeper@optonline.net
    The latest issue is at <http://www.leepers.us/mtvoid/latest.htm>.
    An index with links to the issues of the MT VOID since 1986 is at <http://leepers.us/mtvoid/back_issues.htm>.

    Topics:
    Boy, Did I Screw the Pooch! (comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)
    Mini Reviews, Part 8 (FOUR SAMOSAS, CATHERINE CALLED BIRDY,
    HONK FOR JESUS. SAVE YOUR SOUL) (film reviews
    by Mark R. Leeper and Evelyn C. Leeper)
    THE EPIC OF GILGAMESH (letter of comment by Fred Lerner
    and Sam Long))
    Baggage (letters of comment by Hal Heydt and Jeff Jonas)
    GUILLERMO DEL TORO'S PINOCCHIO (letter of comment
    by Gary McGath)
    DC LEAGUE OF SUPER-PETS (letter of comment by Jay E. Morris)
    This Week's Reading (THE BOOK OF BOOKS) (book comments
    by Evelyn C. Leeper)

    ===================================================================

    TOPIC: Boy, Did I Screw the Pooch! (comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)

    I seem to have mis-attributed several comments in the last issue
    (12/16/22). Damn you, cut and paste!

    Anyway, I have reprinted them in this issue with the correct
    attributions, with apologies to Gary McGath, Jay E. Morris, and
    Scott Dorsey. [-ecl]

    ===================================================================

    TOPIC: Mini Reviews, Part 8 (film reviews by Mark R. Leeper and
    Evelyn C. Leeper)

    This is the eighth batch of mini-reviews, all comedies set in
    different cultures.

    FOUR SAMOSAS: FOUR SAMOSAS starts with the odd image of four
    Indians running around in contemporary Indian clothing, but also
    clearly in disguise. It proceeds to a battle of insults, a satire
    on Bollywood productions, and many take-offs on heist films with a
    far larger budget. (Its budget was $300,000, which these days is
    basically nothing.) But it is also as funny as many action
    comedies which have much larger budgets, and definitely worth
    watching.

    Released on streaming 2 December 2022. Rating: +2 (-4 to +4) or
    7/10

    Film Credits:
    <https://www.imdb.com/title/tt15327014/reference>

    What others are saying:
    <https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/four_samosas>

    CATHERINE CALLED BIRDY: CATHERINE CALLED BIRDY takes a medieval
    setting and populates it with modern people. Well, that is not
    quite fair. But while the attitudes of most of the people around
    Birdy are (mostly) accurate to the period, Birdy's own attitudes an
    actions are modern, and the language everyone speaks is definitely
    modern. (They're not using slang like "hashtag" or "women's lib",
    but there are no "thee"s or "thou"s, no "Yield, you varlet!") And
    the director went for color-blind casting, which makes it look more
    modern or urban or something. The whole idea is that the
    screenwriter uses the film to draw a connection between our modern
    life and the medieval life in the castle. The only problem is that
    the attitudes of some of the people are modernized in order to
    produce the desired ending. Still, it's amusing enough for its
    comedic elements.

    Released 23 September 2022. Rating: +2 (-4 to +4) or 7/10

    Film Credits: <https://www.imdb.com/title/tt11727866/reference>

    What others are saying: <https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/catherine_called_birdy>

    HONK FOR JESUS. SAVE YOUR SOUL: HONK FOR JESUS. SAVE YOUR SOUL is
    billed as a "mockumentary" about a fallen pastor of a megachurch
    and his attempt to get his congregation back. The "humor" is that
    the pastor and his wife ("First Lady") are not repentant (big
    surprise!) but concerned about their image, position, and money.
    One major stumbling block is that it is not a true
    mockumentary--there are scenes that clearly could not have been
    filmed by the documentary crew (e.g., scenes of the couple in bad),
    and other scenes that are shot from multiple angles, or even show
    the filming crew in the shot. Another is that HONK FOR JESUS SAVE
    YOUR SOUL does not really go anywhere; it just sort of peters out.

    Released 02 September 2022. Rating: low +2 (-4 to +4) or 7/10

    Film Credits:
    <https://www.imdb.com/title/tt12655436/reference>

    What others are saying: <https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/honk_for_jesus_save_your_soul>

    [-mrl/ecl]

    ===================================================================

    TOPIC: THE EPIC OF GILGAMESH (letters of comment by Fred Lerner and
    Sam Long)

    In response to Evelyn's comments on THE EPIC OF GILGAMESH in the
    12/16/22 issue of the MT VOID, Fred Lerner writes:

    You wrote about the Epic of Gilgamesh. My favorite version is that
    offered by John Myers Myers, who summarises it in the form of a
    six-stanza drinking song ("Orpheus' Song" in SILVERLOCK). [-fl]

    And Sam Long writes:

    Whenever I run across a reference to Gilgamesh, I can't help but be
    reminded of Jimmy Durante's popular song "Inka Dinka Doo". [-sl]

    ===================================================================

    TOPIC: Baggage (letters of comment by Hal Heydt and Jeff Jonas)

    In response to Peter Trei's comments on baggage in the 12/09/22
    issue of the MT VOID, Hal Heydt writes:

    [Peter Trei writes,] "Does your 'baggage' rejoice in the name
    Hilda, by any chance?" [-pt]

    Shades of Flanders & Swann description of their tour of Canada.
    "Coming back, he had 120 lbs. of excess baggage.In the end, he had
    to leave her behind." [-hh]

    And Jeff Jonas adds:

    There's a "Twilight Zone" episode with that punchline: a prisoner
    on a far away asteroid cannot take his robot companion back home.
    [-jj]

    Evelyn notes:

    Its title is "The Lonely". [-ecl]

    <P><A NAME=rights><B>What Are Your Passenger Rights in
    Space?</B></A> (letter of comment by Hal Heydt):

    In response to <A HREF=VOID1202.htm#rights>Scott Dorsey's comments
    on baggage</A> in the 12/02/22 issue of the MT VOID, Hal Heydt
    writes:

    Shades of Flanders & Swann description of their tour of Canada.
    "Coming back, he had 120 lbs. of excess baggage. In the end, he
    had to leave her behind." [-hh]

    ===================================================================

    TOPIC: GUILLERMO DEL TORO'S PINOCCHIO (letter of comment by Gary
    McGath)

    In response to Mark and Evelyn's review of GUILLERMO DEL TORO'S
    PINOCCHIO in the 12/09/22 issue of the MT VOID, Gary McGath writes:

    Given the massive-sounding changes, they should have called it
    "Carlo Collodi's Pinocchio," in the spirit of "Mary Shelley's
    Frankenstein" and "Bram Stoker's Dracula." [-sd]

    ===================================================================

    TOPIC: DC LEAGUE OF SUPER-PETS (letter of comment by Jay E. Morris)

    In response to Mark and Evelyn's review of DC LEAGUE OF SUPER-PETS
    in the 12/09/22 issue of the MT VOID, Jay R. Morris writes:

    It's a DC project, not Marvel, and in the MCU the Deadpool movies
    did receive R ratings. [-jem]

    Evelyn responds:

    Mea maxima culpa. I wrote that in what was either a brain fart or
    a senior moment. But then again, I don't know which characters are
    in which universe anyway (even if the title does give it away). :-)
    [-ecl]

    ===================================================================

    TOPIC: This Week's Reading (book comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)

    THE BOOK OF BOOKS by Jessica Allen (Black Dog & Leventhal, ISBN 978-0-316-41755-6) is the companion book to the PBS series "The
    Great American Read". As such it is more designed as a
    "read-once", or even a "just-flip-through-once", book rather than
    an on-going reference (unless you count using the list of books as
    a reading "bucket list." So I will give comments on a couple of
    individual articles, rather than trying to review the book as a
    whole.

    Allen lists ten "famous first lines". I'm clearly not as well-read
    as I thought: I recognized only four of them.

    In the write-up about Mark Twain for THE ADVENTURES OF TOM SAWYER,
    Allen doesn't even mention his role in getting General Ulysses S.
    Grant's memoirs, though he does cover Twain's financial troubles.
    (And why TOM SAWYER instead of HUCKLEBERRY FINN?)

    Of James Patterson, Allen says, "Patterson has had more than 50
    'New York Times' bestsellers, a world record. So he doesn't just
    write fast, he writes well." Maybe, but the "New York Times" best
    seller list reports popularity, not quality. Erich Segal's LOVE
    STORY was on the list for 41 weeks, and is not considered a paragon
    of quality.

    In the description of Agatha Christie's AND THEN THERE WERE NONE,
    Allen gives the original title of the book, TEN LITTLE N*****S",
    explaining that Was how the rhyme was known at the time, but does
    not mention the interim title, TEN LITTLE INDIANS.

    Prince Edward Island in Canada is known for two things, potatoes
    and ANNE OF GREEN GABLES. The former does not draw nearly as many
    tourists as the latter.

    In contrast to the large numbers of novels by some writers (such as
    Agatha Christie or James Patterson, we have others, such as J. D.
    Salinger or Margaret Mitchell, who had but a single novel to their
    name. (Mitchell was killed in a car accident relatively early, but
    had already decided that she could never match the success of GONE
    WITH THE WIND and determined never to write another book. And John
    Kennedy Toole committed suicide when he couldn't manage to sell his
    first novel, A CONFEDERACY OF DUNCES. Salinger continued to write,
    just not novels.)

    Of THE CURIOUS INCIDENT OF THE DOG IN THE NIGHT-TIME, Allen writes,
    that author Mark Haddon is "demonstrating sensitivity toward those
    with mental and physical disorders." The protagonist is
    universally accepted as being autistic (or "being on the spectrum",
    if you prefer), yet Allen never uses either term, and there is much
    debate about whether autism is a disorder or disability.

    Allen claims that by the conclusion of Isaac Asimov's complete
    "Foundation" series, "he was widely recognized as perhaps the
    greatest sci-fi writer ever to pick up a pen." Hardly, and it's
    statements such as this that made this book irritating.

    Since this is a 2018 book, the chapter on THE GREAT GATSBY has no
    mention of Nghi Vo's THE CHOSEN AND THE BEAUTIFUL.

    And the decision to print some pages with white print on blue
    background means this is aimed at the "Wired" generation rather
    than people with vision problems. [-ecl]

    ===================================================================

    Mark Leeper
    mleeper@optonline.net


    We all declare for liberty, but in using the same word
    we do not all mean the same thing.
    --Abraham Lincoln

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gary McGath@21:1/5 to eleeper@optonline.net on Mon Dec 26 15:16:21 2022
    On 12/26/22 12:22 AM, eleeper@optonline.net wrote:
    CATHERINE CALLED BIRDY: CATHERINE CALLED BIRDY takes a medieval
    setting and populates it with modern people. Well, that is not
    quite fair. But while the attitudes of most of the people around
    Birdy are (mostly) accurate to the period, Birdy's own attitudes an
    actions are modern, and the language everyone speaks is definitely
    modern. (They're not using slang like "hashtag" or "women's lib",
    but there are no "thee"s or "thou"s, no "Yield, you varlet!") And
    the director went for color-blind casting, which makes it look more
    modern or urban or something. The whole idea is that the
    screenwriter uses the film to draw a connection between our modern
    life and the medieval life in the castle. The only problem is that
    the attitudes of some of the people are modernized in order to
    produce the desired ending. Still, it's amusing enough for its
    comedic elements.

    All I've seen of Birdy is the trailer, so I can't comment knowledgeably
    on it, but I think modernized grammar is entirely acceptable and often preferable in portraying the Middle Ages. Getting it right is hard and
    is apt to confuse people. If the setting is before 1066, the Anglo-Saxon
    people spoke then is effectively a foreign language. "Translating" the
    dialogue into modern English avoids a lot of problems.

    Avoiding modern word imagery is more important when trying to immerse
    the reader or viewer. A character in the trailer talks about a pox
    "going around." This feels like a modern way of thinking about a
    disease. Immersion seems to be the last thing the creators had in mind,
    so the anachronism may have been intentional. A serious treatment might
    talk about a pox "descending on" or "sweeping through" the area.
    --
    Gary McGath http://www.mcgath.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)