• MT VOID, 08/05/22 -- Vol. 41, No. 6, Whole Number 2235

    From evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Sun Aug 7 06:14:01 2022
    THE MT VOID
    08/05/22 -- Vol. 41, No. 6, Whole Number 2235

    Co-Editor: Mark Leeper, mleeper@optonline.net
    Co-Editor: Evelyn Leeper, eleeper@optonline.net
    Sending Address: evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com
    All material is the opinion of the author and is copyrighted by the
    author unless otherwise noted.
    All comments sent or posted will be assumed authorized for
    inclusion unless otherwise noted.

    To subscribe or unsubscribe, send mail to eleeper@optonline.net
    The latest issue is at <http://www.leepers.us/mtvoid/latest.htm>.
    An index with links to the issues of the MT VOID since 1986 is at <http://leepers.us/mtvoid/back_issues.htm>.

    Topics:
    Six Lost Worlds: The Dramatic Adaptations of Sir Arthur
    Conan Doyle's Novel (Part 3) (film comments
    by Mark R. Leeper)
    OPERATION MINCEMEAT (letter of comment by Joseph T. Major)
    Racist, Sexist Robots (letter of comment by Gary McGath)
    This Week's Reading (NEEDLE) (book comments
    by Evelyn C. Leeper)

    ===================================================================

    TOPIC: Six Lost Worlds: The Dramatic Adaptations of Sir Arthur
    Conan Doyle's Novel (Part 3) (film comments by Mark R. Leeper)

    [continued from last week]

    THE LOST WORLD (1992)

    The 1992 version of THE LOST WORLD, a Canadian production directed
    by Timothy Bond (who previously directed episodes for the
    television series "Star Trek: The Next Generation" and "War of the
    Worlds") and written and co-produced by Harry Alan Towers. The
    film is shot in Zimbabwe and apparently was made together or in
    tandem with a sequel, RETURN TO THE LOST WORLD. To accommodate
    this location the plateau is moved from South America to Africa.
    The transplant gives the story a sort of H. Rider Haggard feel that
    would be okay, but it is not Doyle.

    Towers's script starts reasonably faithful to the Doyle but quickly
    shows its loyalties are more to sending (condescending) politically
    correct messages than to the text by Doyle. Male chauvinists
    everywhere are given a come-uppance by a strong female on the
    expedition. Because the script is already being written on a
    juvenile level, a boy is added to the expedition to give children
    someone to identify with.

    As in the book, Malone (Edward McCormack) passes himself off to
    Challenger (John Rhys-Davies) as a scientist, but he does not have
    the knowledge to maintain the ruse. Malone is, incidentally, made
    a Canadian to give the Canadian audience a one of their own to care
    about. Challenger attacks Malone, the police intervene, and Malone
    endears himself to Challenger by choosing not to press charges.
    The forming of the expedition is pretty much like in the manner of
    the novel though they end up with woman reporter Jenny Nielson
    (Tamara Gorksu) and a twelve-ish boy Jim (Darren Peter Mercer).
    The character of Roxton has been eliminated and there is no
    equivalent. As in the book but few film versions it is decided
    that it is Summerlee (David Warner) who will lead the expedition
    and Challenger will remain behind. Not to worry, Rhys-Davies is
    too big a star to not be included in the expedition.

    More invented characters come along. On the way the expedition is
    joined by a female Noble Savage in a revealing two-piece outfit.
    She is Malu (Nathania Stanford) and can be counted on to have
    politically correct thinking as everybody raised in the bush would
    have. Also along is the nasty Gomez (Geza Kovacs). One more piece
    that harks from the book--in the end the expedition brings back to
    London a pterodactyl, though the story of the pterodactyl is
    somewhat different from Doyle's tale.

    The reporter Jenny Nielson appears inspired by the real person
    Nellie Bly. She is a slightly aggressive feminist. On the other
    hand John Rhys-Davies makes a passable Challenger in stature and
    temperament. He is, after his earliest scenes and though he feuds
    with Summerlee, less strident and more boyishly likable than in the
    Doyle.

    The choice to do the film in a didactic and juvenile fashion that
    makes it a very bad disappointment after a start that is at least
    decent. The dinosaurs were rubbery and cute with rough edges
    rounded off and so was the writing. The script looks for every
    politically correct lesson that can be wrung from the plot. Doyle,
    of course, had no women on the expedition. The first two film
    versions each had one woman along. This version has two attractive
    women and a plucky youngster. Things are going downhill.

    I will not say much about the sequel, RETURN TO THE LOST WORLD. It
    is not an adaptation of the Doyle, but only inspired by it. The
    story involves European entrepreneurs who want to exploit the
    petroleum in the no longer lost world and the team returns to the
    plateau to protect it. It is not the most original or engaging
    story and did not really need this particular prehistoric land to
    tell its story. The sequel certainly underscored that Maple White
    Land was a noble and wondrous world that needed to be preserved.
    The 1998 version had a very different attitude toward Maple White's
    mysterious land.

    THE LOST WORLD (1998)
    a.k.a. SIR ARTHUR CONAN DOYLE'S THE LOST WORLD

    Six years after the Canadian production of THE LOST WORLD, the
    story was again adapted in the United States with some unusual
    variations. Even the title was modified. Following the films BRAM
    STOKER'S DRACULA and MARY SHELLEY'S FRANKENSTEIN, it became popular
    to include the original author's name in the title of films based
    on classics. It somehow promised that the content fidelity to the
    original work. BRAM STOKER'S DRACULA added a love interest for
    Dracula that Bram Stoker would not have recognized, and MARY
    SHELLEY'S FRANKENSTEIN had Victor bringing his bride back from the
    dead in precisely the way that the character in the book did not.
    Still, it was popular for a while to put the author's name in the
    title. Hence in two years we have two different films titled SIR
    ARTHUR CONAN DOYLE'S THE LOST WORLD. This is the first. To make
    things even more confusing the two versions each has the same actor
    playing Summerlee. It must take a lot of explanation on his resume
    that these really are different films. This film proves its
    loyalty (or lack thereof) to the original text by starting in
    Mongolia, of all places.

    The 1998 film opens with Maple White finding a pterodactyl egg and
    paying for it with his life. He lives long enough to pass his
    notebook and other interesting evidence to his traveling companion
    and partner G. E. Challenger (Patrick Bergin, who does not look
    anything like Doyle's Challenger). When Challenger returns to
    London with his claims that dinosaurs exist, showing notebooks as
    his evidence, as usual in adaptations he is met with skepticism and
    is offered the means for an expedition. Amanda White (Jayne
    Heitmeyer) recognizes her father's notebooks and insists on being
    part of the expedition. Mr. Summerlee is ambivalent about being
    asked to go on the expedition, but after a moment agrees. Unique
    in this version, Summerlee is actually a fairly decent and
    interesting character and one the audience cares for. Michael
    Sinelnikoff makes a very acceptable if not highly memorable
    Summerlee. He does such a good job that in the unrelated
    production the following year he repeated the role, though that
    part was not as well written. He is, I believe, the only actor to
    repeat a role in two unconnected productions of THE LOST WORLD. He
    also plays the role in the "Lost World" television series, of which
    I will say more later. John Roxton (David Nerman) is demoted from
    being the book's English lord to being an obnoxious American hunter
    who later proves to be of villainous intent. Arthur (!) Malone the
    reporter also joins the expedition played by an unmemorable Julian
    Casey. Bergin's Challenger gets along neither with Summerlee nor
    Roxton, though the audience likes Roxton considerably less.

    Using several conveyances of the period, which seems to be the
    1930s or so, the crew makes its way to Mongolia and the plateau out
    of time. The final step involves a helium balloon to ascend the
    plateau as a sort of getaway after the team has just rescued Ms.
    White. In the best traditions of KING KONG she had been kidnapped
    by natives and stretched out on a rack. Having just been rescued
    and ascending to a land of vicious dinosaurs, Amanda White
    literally found herself between a rack and a hard place. And a
    hard place, the plateau is. The travelers find their land of dinosaurs--particularly vicious dinosaurs--and two warring tribes.
    One of the tribes are Neanderthals one more modern. In the end of
    an uncomfortable stay only Challenger and White make it out alive,
    though Malone is left behind on plateau like an Edgar Rice
    Burroughs hero.

    We initially see a "brontosaurus" with some features that are wrong
    for the animal. Perhaps some effect artist tried to get creative.
    However, it turns out that the inaccuracy is a feature, not a bug.
    With hundreds of millions of years of evolution. it appears
    dinosaurs have diverged from those in the fossil record. Other
    adaptations have implied that once you got to know this plateau it
    was a groovy place to be. Perhaps one of the best touches of this
    version is that definitely is NOT the case in this adaptation.
    This is probably the goriest adaptation, and the plateau is a
    painful and dangerous place to be. Perhaps inspired by JURASSIC
    PARK this film has the meanest and most nasty dinosaurs of any
    version. The dinosaur effects seem to be in large part digital,
    though perhaps some mechanical effects were used also.

    Making up a little for deficiencies in the writing the film has a
    terrific look. The art direction by Sylvain Gingras has an antique
    Indiana Jones tone. Several interesting vehicles are used to bring
    the explorers to Maple White land, especially a sort of half-track
    bus. While the transplantation from a South American jungle to
    snowy Mongolia seems all wrong, it is not a bad setting for an
    adventure story. It is reminiscent RKO setting their SHE (1935) in
    Tibet rather than Africa.

    In the end, with Malone marooned in Maple White Land as a sort of
    Robinson Crusoe with dinosaurs, it is expected his adventures might
    continue. No sequel was made. However, someone in Canada had a
    very similar idea. Why not have a TV series set on the plateau?
    So nearly at the same time Canadian producers made their own
    version of the story, but handled it as a TV pilot and sold an
    entire TV series on the premise.

    [continued next week]

    [-mrl]

    ===================================================================

    TOPIC: OPERATION MINCEMEAT (letter of comment by Joseph T. Major)

    In response to Evelyn's comments on OPERATION MINCEMEAT in the
    07/29/22 issue of the MT VOID, Joseph T. Major writes:

    I have both Macintyre's OPERATION MINCEMEAT and Montagu's THE MAN
    WHO NEVER WAS. I also have the book which provoked the writing of
    THE MAN WHO NEVER WAS.

    Duff Cooper (Viscount Norwich, husband of the famous society figure
    Lady Diana Cooper, and father of the historian John Julius Norwich)
    knew something about Operation MINCEMEAT, and wrote a novel about a
    British officer who "served his country in death" by having his
    body dropped off the Spanish coast with a briefcase of forged
    documents, OPERATION HEARTBREAK.

    Instead of prosecuting Cooper for violating the Official Secrets
    Act, the intelligence establishment decided to get out a carefully
    edited version of the story. [-jtm]

    ===================================================================

    TOPIC: Racist, Sexist Robots (letter of comment by Gary McGath)

    In response to a news article commenting on robots being racist and
    sexist in the 07/29/22 issue of the MT VOID, Gary McGath writes:

    The flaw was inherent in the experiment. The software (calling it
    a "virtual robot" just adds clickbait) was used to identify
    personal characteristics based on facial appearance. How could it
    not engage in some kind of stereotyping?

    The only thing it can do is go by statistics. In the United
    States, black people more often have menial jobs than whites do,
    black crime rates are higher, and women are more often homemakers
    (though the correlation is less than it used to be). This doesn't
    mean you should assume someone is a criminal or has a low-paying
    job based on appearance, but that was exactly what the software was
    directed to do. [-gmg]

    Evelyn responds:

    One is reminded of the "South pacific" song "You've Got to Be
    Carefully Taught", the key lyric being:

    You've got to be taught to be afraid
    Of people whose eyes are oddly made,
    And people whose skin is a diff'rent shade,
    You've got to be carefully taught.

    [-ecl]

    ===================================================================

    TOPIC: This Week's Reading (book comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)

    Our film-and-book group did THE HIDDEN as its film, and NEEDLE by
    Hal Clement (Avon, ISBN 0-380-44263-9) as the accompanying novel.
    (The film is chosen first, and then an appropriate book is chosen
    to go with it. Often the book is the basis of the film, but not
    always.) NEEDLE was written in 1950 and, boy, does its age show.
    And "boy" is the operative word here. There is a female school
    nurse, and Bob's mother, and maybe a female teacher, but this is
    definitely a boy's book. And a boy's book of the "Tom
    Swift"/"Hardy Boys" type, where somehow the (fifteen-year-old boys
    have all sorts of unsupervised time, and get to do all sorts of
    dangerous things, and seem totally independent of any adult
    supervision unless it is needed to give them something to get
    around. (In fairness, "Nancy Drew" books were the same.) I guess
    things were like that back then (whenever the "then" was that
    Clement was writing about, even though it was supposedly set in the
    near future). If one reads ROCKET BOYS by Homer Hickham, Jr., one
    sees the same independence: the boys in that build and fire rockets
    miles from home, as well as pull up and sell abandoned rails and
    other activities that would be more than highly questionable today.

    And the setting of NEEDLE is equally unbelievable: a small South
    Seas island (my estimate from the information is about five square
    miles) with lots of construction materials and enough children to
    provide Bob with at least three friends his same age, as well as
    enough to have quite a few other children in the island's school.
    (Oddly, though, none of the teenagers seem to have any noticeable
    siblings.) Most of the people live in about thirty houses, so
    figure maybe fifty houses total, or a couple of hundred people.
    Even if the company only took young married couples (and given that
    all the jobs seem to be held by the men, why would the company take
    on all those extra people?), the demographics are all wrong.

    (And while we're at it, why is Bob attending a private school
    literally halfway around the world from his home?)

    Yeah, I know--that's not the point of the story. But it creates a
    problem with accepting the premises. But somehow it's easier to
    accept an amorphous alien that inhabits its host's body that the
    human society Clement has describe. [-ecl]

    ===================================================================

    Mark Leeper
    mleeper@optonline.net


    Get thee glass eyes;
    And like a scurvy politician, seem
    To see the things thou dost not.
    --Shakespeare
    [King Lear, Act IV,
    Scene 6]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gary McGath@21:1/5 to eleeper@optonline.net on Sun Aug 7 16:46:55 2022
    On 8/7/22 9:14 AM, eleeper@optonline.net wrote:
    Six years after the Canadian production of THE LOST WORLD, the
    story was again adapted in the United States with some unusual
    variations. Even the title was modified. Following the films BRAM
    STOKER'S DRACULA and MARY SHELLEY'S FRANKENSTEIN, it became popular
    to include the original author's name in the title of films based
    on classics. It somehow promised that the content fidelity to the
    original work. BRAM STOKER'S DRACULA added a love interest for
    Dracula that Bram Stoker would not have recognized, and MARY
    SHELLEY'S FRANKENSTEIN had Victor bringing his bride back from the
    dead in precisely the way that the character in the book did not.
    Still, it was popular for a while to put the author's name in the
    title. Hence in two years we have two different films titled SIR
    ARTHUR CONAN DOYLE'S THE LOST WORLD.

    Some people were so annoyed with the changes Peter Jackson made to Lord
    of the Rings that they said it should be called "J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord
    of the Rings."

    --
    Gary McGath http://www.mcgath.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)