THE MT VOID
Mt. Holz Science Fiction Society
05/06/22 -- Vol. 40, No. 45, Whole Number 2222
Co-Editor: Mark Leeper,
mleeper@optonline.net
Co-Editor: Evelyn Leeper,
eleeper@optonline.net
Sending Address:
evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com
All material is the opinion of the author and is copyrighted by the
author unless otherwise noted.
All comments sent or posted will be assumed authorized for
inclusion unless otherwise noted.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, send mail to
eleeper@optonline.net
The latest issue is at <
http://www.leepers.us/mtvoid/latest.htm>.
An index with links to the issues of the MT VOID since 1986 is at <
http://leepers.us/mtvoid/back_issues.htm>.
Topics:
Mini Reviews, Part 16 (CRUELLA, JUNGLE CRUISE)
(film reviews by Mark R. Leeper
and Evelyn C. Leeper)
ROME and Historical Figures (letter of comment
by Joseph T. Major)
This Week's Reading (A STUDY IN SCARLET) (book comments
by Evelyn C. Leeper)
===================================================================
TOPIC: Mini Reviews, Part 16 (film reviews by Mark R. Leeper and
Evelyn C. Leeper)
Here is the sixteenth "batch" of (well, two) mini-reviews, films
for the whole family (more or less):
CRUELLA: CRUELLA is a prequel to 101 DALMATIANS (1996), or ONE
HUNDRED AND ONE DALMATIANS (1996), or both. It gives the back
story of Cruella DeVil, but not the back story you expect. It
seems to be following in the genre of story in which everything you
thought you knew turns out to be wrong, and the first one of these
I can recall is Gregory Maguire's novel WICKED. All the acting
seems to be over the top, but it's probably amusing enough for an
undemanding audience.
Released theatrically 05/18/21; available on DVD and on various
streaming services. Rating: +1 (-4 to +4), or 6/10.
Film Credits:
<
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt3228774/reference>
What others are saying:
<
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/cruella>
JUNGLE CRUISE: JUNGLE CRUISE (the movie) was based on "Jungle
Cruise", a Disneyland ride, so we weren't expecting much, and were
definitely pleasantly surprised. (Then again, so was PIRATES OF
THE CARIBBEAN, and that turned out well.) It does add to the story
some supernatural elements apparently not found in Disneyland.
Screenwriters Michael Green, Glenn Ficarra, and John Requa deliver
a script that is actually well written and one that is more fun
than usual. That quality of writing talent is hard to find these
days. The script owes some of its intelligence and humor to THE
AFRICAN QUEEN and ROMANCING THE STONE, as well as THE MUMMY (1999)
and RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARK. But there is nothing wrong with using
classics as inspiration, especially when one expects many in the
audience to get the references. Dwayne Johnson is charming as
Frank Wollf in a Charlie Allnut sort of way; Emily Blunt is a bit
more openly assertive as Lily Houghton than Rose Sayer was. All in
all, this is a fun movie.
Released theatrically 07/20/21; available on Disney+. Rating: +2
(-4 to +4), or 7/10.
Film Credits:
<
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0870154/reference>
What others are saying:
<
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/jungle_cruise>
[-mrl/ecl]
===================================================================
TOPIC: ROME and Historical Figures (letter of comment by Joseph
T. Major)
In response to Evelyn's comments on the HBO series ROME in the
04/29/22 issue of the MT VOID, Joseph T. Major writes:
[Evelyn writes,] "Only HBO's ROME comes close on the historical
figures, but the two main characters are totally fictional." [-ecl]
Not totally.
"In that legion there were two very brave men, centurions, who were
now approaching the first ranks, T. Pullio, and L. Vorenus. These
used to have continual disputes between them which of them should
be preferred, and every year used to contend for promotion with the
utmost animosity. When the fight was going on most vigorously
before the fortifications, Pullio, one of them, says, "Why do you
hesitate, Vorenus? or what [better] opportunity of signalizing your
valor do you seek? This very day shall decide our disputes." When
he had uttered these words, he proceeds beyond the fortifications,
and rushes on that part of the enemy which appeared the thickest.
Nor does Vorenus remain within the rampart, but respecting the high
opinion of all, follows close after. Then, when an inconsiderable
space intervened, Pullio throws his javelin at the enemy, and
pierces one of the multitude who was running up, and while the
latter was wounded and slain, the enemy cover him with their
shields, and all throw their weapons at the other and afford him no
opportunity of retreating. The shield of Pullio is pierced and a
javelin is fastened in his belt. This circumstance turns aside his
scabbard and obstructs his right hand when attempting to draw his
sword: the enemy crowd around him when [thus] embarrassed. His
rival runs up to him and succors him in this emergency.
Immediately the whole host turn from Pullio to him, supposing the
other to be pierced through by the javelin. Vorenus rushes on
briskly with his sword and carries on the combat hand to hand, and
having slain one man, for a short time drove back the rest: while
he urges on too eagerly, slipping into a hollow, he fell. To him,
in his turn, when surrounded, Pullio brings relief; and both having
slain a great number, retreat into the fortifications amid the
highest applause. Fortune so dealt with both in this rivalry and
conflict, that the one competitor was a succor and a safeguard to
the other, nor could it be determined which of the two appeared
worthy of being preferred to the other." [n Bellum Gallicum,
Liber V, XLIV]
Not quite like the two characters, but there were people of the
same name. [-jtm]
Evelyn responds:
HBO may have used two names out of history, but the characters as
shown in the series are just two legionaries with the same names,
but nothing else in common so far as we know. So I think of them
as totally fictional. YMMV. [-ecl]
===================================================================
TOPIC: This Week's Reading (book comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)
I've written comments on several Sherlock Holmes stories, but today
I will tackle the first, A STUDY IN SCARLET by Arthur Conan Doyle.
It is also one of the four novels (as opposed to being a short
story). As I think will be clear, Doyle had not firmed up the back
story for either of his characters. Watson's famously "wandering
wound" doesn't wander in this story, but is not consistent across
all the stories. I will note other changes as well.
Watson begins by saying his health was "irretrievably ruined." He
later adds "I am not strong enough yet to stand much noise or
excitement," and says, "My health forbade me from venturing out
unless the weather was exceptionally genial." Doyle seems to hold
to this in this book, but even just one book later (THE SIGN OF
FOUR) Watson is involved in quite a bit of excitement, and in
future stories he is climbing walls, running across moors, and
constantly being told to bring his service revolver on trips, which
sounds pretty exciting to me.
Stamford says that Holmes had found some nice rooms "which were too
much for his purse." That may have been true then, but from the
start Holmes is spending money right and left, and not always being
reimbursed. For example, he pays the six Baker Street Irregulars a
shilling each the first time they show up and presumably at least
one more each when they find the Aurora.
Anyway, Watson's pension is eleven shillings and sixpence a day, or
a little over four pounds a week. Stangerson and Drebber were
paying a pound a day each for rooms at the Charpentiers', or
fourteen pounds a week. Even if one thinks of the Charpentiers as
running a hotel, while 221B is a long-term rental, it doesn't seem
as if Watson could afford half the rental. (We are never told what
the rental is, but we do know that what Holmes paid in rent would
have paid for the building several times over.)
Jefferson Hope sends someone to 221B Baker Street to get the
wedding ring. Yet he is not the least bit suspicious when Wiggins
asks him to bring his cab to that same address at the end of the
story.
It is beyond coincidence that just when Holmes needs to check if a
pill contains poison, there happens to be a sick dog that needs to
be put out of its misery. (And given the expression on
Stangerson's face, it does not seem like this was a particularly
painless death.) On the other hand, it may explain what happened
to the bull pup Watson mentioned keeping; was it given away because
it couldn't get along with the terrier? (Though how Watson managed
to have a bull pup when he was fresh out of the Army and living in
a hotel on limited funds is never explained either.)
Watson writes, "I might have suspected him of being addicted to the
use of some narcotic, had not the temperance and cleanliness of his
whole life forbidden such a notion." By the start of THE SIGN OF
FOUR, Holmes is explicitly a cocaine user, but it is not clear
whether Doyle intended this when he wrote A STUDY IN SCARLET.
Holmes describes himself as the only consulting detective in the
world. "Here in London we have lots of government detectives and
lots of private ones. When these fellows are at fault, they come
to me, and I manage to put them on the right scent." But this
also does not last long. Although he claims the non-Scotland-Yard
cases are "mostly sent on by private inquiry agencies," it is clear
that he quickly developed a reputation and people would come on
their own. This is especially true when it is not obvious at the
start that there has been a crime. I don't feel like checking
every story, but it appears that almost all the stories in the
first collection, THE ADVENTURES OF SHERLOCK HOLMES--are brought to
him by private individuals acting in their own behalf.)
Holmes complains that Scotland Yard "will pocket all the credit,"
but he certainly manages to become well enough known to get a lot
of future cases on his reputation alone, and in later stories tells
various police detectives that he does not want any credit or
publicity (although it may not take much for him to gain a good
reputation).
Though the relationship between the Mormons and the Masons has been
rocky at times, it is certainly possible that Stangerson would have
a "gold ring with a Masonic device."
The idea that you can judge a person's height by the length of
their stride assumes that the ratio of leg length to overall height
is a constant. It isn't. For example, at one point I wore a pants
leg an inch longer than Mark, yet he was three inches taller than I
was.
Does lightness and transparency of pills really indicate solubility
in water?
Jefferson Hope is also suffering from ill health, yet manages to
engage in a struggle described as a "furious resistance" with at
least three men. His aneurism conveniently waits until he has told
his story and then, apparently, bursts when he is sleeping
peacefully.
Hope said, "I had grown my beard and there was no chance of their
recognising me." Then he says then Enoch Drebber, even drunk, was
able to recognize him.
And keeping the wedding ring as a memento of Lucy seems strange,
since it would be something she hated, not something she treasured.
These obviously are just a few of the items worth noting in the
book. For a more complete annotation, see either William
Baring-Gould's or Leslie Klinger's annotated versions. (There is
also an Oxford annotated version but it is nowhere near as complete
as Baring-Gould or Klinger.) [-ecl]
===================================================================
Mark Leeper
mleeper@optonline.net
Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because fiction
is obliged to stick to possibilities; truth isn't.
--Mark Twain
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)