Allowing full convention attendance without a WSFS membership strikes me
as falling under the letter of this rule, but not the intent. I'm no
expert on this, and there are people here who understand WSFS operations
much better than I do. Could someone give an informed opinion on this?
The Helsinki folks wanted the same sort of thing, but they approached it in
a MUCH better way by giving a "first worldcon" discount. This brings in more people who wouldn't otherwise have gone to worldcon, but at the same time
it does nothing to set up a line between different classes of attendees.
It is possible that the Chengdu folks took the route they did rather than
the route taken in Helsinki because they didn't want a huge flush of new people voting on the Hugos. On the other hand, that happened after Helsinki and it was a good thing on the whole.
On 4/1/22 9:35 AM, Scott Dorsey wrote:
The Helsinki folks wanted the same sort of thing, but they approached it in >> a MUCH better way by giving a "first worldcon" discount. This brings in more
people who wouldn't otherwise have gone to worldcon, but at the same time
it does nothing to set up a line between different classes of attendees.
It is possible that the Chengdu folks took the route they did rather than
the route taken in Helsinki because they didn't want a huge flush of new
people voting on the Hugos. On the other hand, that happened after Helsinki >> and it was a good thing on the whole.
According to everyone's predictions, the large majority of the
attendance at the 2023 Worldcon will be Chinese who have never attended
a Worldcon before. Maybe the concom wanted to avoid having them dominate
the Hugo voting.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 399 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 70:29:15 |
Calls: | 8,356 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 13,159 |
Messages: | 5,895,048 |