• MT VOID, 02/25/22 -- Vol. 40, No. 35, Whole Number 2212

    From evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Sun Feb 27 06:23:21 2022
    THE MT VOID
    Mt. Holz Science Fiction Society
    02/25/22 -- Vol. 40, No. 35, Whole Number 2212

    Co-Editor: Mark Leeper, mleeper@optonline.net
    Co-Editor: Evelyn Leeper, eleeper@optonline.net
    Sending Address: evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com
    All material is the opinion of the author and is copyrighted by the
    author unless otherwise noted.
    All comments sent or posted will be assumed authorized for
    inclusion unless otherwise noted.

    To subscribe or unsubscribe, send mail to eleeper@optonline.net
    The latest issue is at <http://www.leepers.us/mtvoid/latest.htm>.
    An index with links to the issues of the MT VOID since 1986 is at <http://leepers.us/mtvoid/back_issues.htm>.

    Topics:
    Science Fiction (and Other) Discussion Groups, Films,
    Lectures, etc. (NJ)
    My Picks for Turner Classic Movies in March (comments
    by Mark R. Leeper)
    REACHER (Season 1) (television review by Dale Skran)
    Mini Reviews by Evelyn, Part 2 (MUNICH--THE EDGE OF WAR,
    THE LAST DUEL, MRS. HENDERSON PRESENTS (2005), and
    FLORENCE FOSTER JENKINS (2016)) (film reviews
    by Evelyn C. Leeper)
    Holmdel Bell Labs Building (letter of comment
    by David G. Leeper)
    Star Trek Economics, THE PLANETS, and THE END OF ETERNITY
    (letter of comment by John Purcell)
    This Week's Reading (THE DISPOSSESSED) (book comments
    by Evelyn C. Leeper)

    ===================================================================

    TOPIC: Science Fiction (and Other) Discussion Groups, Films,
    Lectures, etc. (NJ)

    Alas, both groups have returned to Zoom meetings, due in part to
    COVID, and in part to unpredictable weather. Movies for the
    Middletown meeting will be ones people can watch on YouTube,
    archive.org, or other free services.

    March 3, 2022 (MTPL), 7PM: UNDER THE SKIN (2014) & novel
    by Michel Faber
    movie: <https://www.hoopladigital.com/title/12454572>
    ebook: <https://www.hoopladigital.com/title/12325827>
    audiobook: <https://www.hoopladigital.com/title/10024296>
    [links are for MTPL card holders only]
    March 24, 2022 (OBPL): TERRA INCOGNITA by Connie Willis,
    containing three novellas: "Uncharted Territory", "Remake",
    and "D.A."
    (The first two are also in FUTURES IMPERFECT, and all are
    available in stand-alone volumes.)

    ===================================================================

    TOPIC: My Picks for Turner Classic Movies in March (comments by
    Mark R. Leeper)

    There have been amazing number of film adaptions of Robert Louis
    Stevenson' s mystery THE STRANGE CASE OF DR JEKYLL AND MR HYDE. It
    is a story that gives a bit of a chill without requiring much
    beyond makeup effects. There is one version that seems preferred
    over all the others. That is the 1931 version starring Frederic
    March doing both title roles: Jekyll and Hyde. It features the use
    of a makeup trick that allows Jekyll to become Hyde on screen (or
    stage) right in front of the audience. His Hyde is a really
    effective and ape-like.

    [THE STRANGE CASE OF DR JEKYLL AND MR HYDE, March 8, 2:15AM]

    March being "31 Days of Oscar" month, there are not a lot of
    science fiction or fantasy films on Turner except for those that
    got nominations for things like visual effects or make-up, or
    marginal films such as HAMLET (1948). (Trivia: A MIDSUMMER'S NIGHT
    DREAM, running on March 7 at 10:30AM, won the Oscar for
    cinematography, and is the only Oscar-winner ever to win on a
    write-in campaign; after it, the Academy prohibited write-in
    votes.) TCM is, however, running the infrequently-seen "The Dot
    and the Line" on March 10, at 6:15AM.

    [-mrl]

    ===================================================================

    TOPIC: REACHER (Season 1) (television review by Dale Skran)

    Amazon has stepped up to the plate and corrected the errors of the
    two Tom Cruise "Reacher" movies by casting Alan Ritchson as Jack
    Reacher. Unlike the fairly short Cruise [5 foot 7 inches],
    Ritchson stands a s full 6 foot 2 inches, and with a little bit of
    movie magic looms over everyone else like the character from the
    book, where Reacher is described as being 6 foot 5 inches. Also,
    Ritchson, whom you may know from his portrayal of the DC superhero
    "Hawk" in TITANS, is totally ripped, bringing more believability to
    the character.

    Unlike the two Cruise films, which condensed and twisted the plots
    almost beyond recognition, REACHER sticks fairly closely to the
    first book, with the addition of a few elements from later books,
    notably the character of Neagley and the scene where Reacher's
    mother is dying of cancer. The final battle in the series is less
    cinematic in terms of how it looks in the book but more Hollywood
    in the way it breaks down into less than realistic one-on-one
    fights between our heroes and the bad guys.

    Overall, though, REACHER is a great adaptation of the first book in
    the series, THE KILLING FLOOR. Some of the things that REACHER
    gets right include:
    - The small-town, backwoods ambience of the books
    - Brutal, realistic, well-choreographed fights that show the kind
    of techniques a really big, strong, well-trained fighter would use
    - Lots of elbow strikes, punches, and head butts, with no fancy
    kicking or jumping. I was particularly pleased to see a large
    number of elbow strikes, which is probably the most powerful move
    available with your upper body, and far more directionally flexible
    than is generally understood.
    - Honestly showing that Reacher has zero interest in a "fair fight."
    - Showing clearly that Reacher is a great detective, on the level
    of Sherlock Holmes or Patrick Jane
    - Communicating that although Reacher may not be steeped in book
    learning, he is almost always the smartest person in the room
    - Highlighting the plain-spoken ex-military man of honor that
    Reacher is in the books
    - A sense of how Reacher is quite different from your typical hero
    as he wanders the byways of rural America, seeking to experience
    firsthand the country he has spent his life fighting for overseas

    Malcom Goodwin [iZombie] plays Oscar Finley, a black Boston cop who
    has moved to Margrave, Georgia for his own reasons, and Willa
    Fitzgerald has a turn as Roscoe Conkin, one of the few honest cops
    in Margrave. Finley and Conklin aid Reacher in his quest to find
    his brother's killer and bring Reacher-style justice to Margrave.
    The three have great chemistry, and I found their interactions
    believable. Goodwin is a very talented actor who is great fun to
    watch.

    This is a violent, cable-style series, is plenty of beefcake and
    some female upper torso nudity, but it is true to the spirit of the
    books in a way that the movies were not. The series length--8
    episodes--is plenty of time to fully adapt the novel w/o weird
    character mergers or gross over-simplifications of the plot.

    As a Jack Reacher adaptation, REACHER is a must-watch for any fan
    of the series. Those who haven't read the books will find that the
    series stands on its own. As a fan of the books, it's hard for me
    to give an objective rating. REACHER is not as good as something
    like THE AMERICANS or BOSCH, but it is not that far below them
    either - a solid +2 on the -4 to +4 scale. With the graphic
    violence and sex, as well as post-torture viewing of bodies,
    REACHER may not be for everyone, and certainly is not for kids.
    [-dls]

    ===================================================================

    TOPIC: Mini Reviews by Evelyn, Part 2 (film reviews by Evelyn
    C. Leeper)

    MUNICH--THE EDGE OF WAR: MUNICH--THE EDGE OF WAR is not science
    fiction, but as a historical drama it veers towards alternate
    history. It is based on the novel by Robert Harris, who is best
    known (to me, anyway) as the author of FATHERLAND, which definitely
    *is* an alternate history. In MUNICH--THE EDGE OF WAR, the biggest
    change is in Neville Chamberlain, who is portrayed, not as being
    taken in by Hitler, but rather working a longer plan to prepare
    Britain (and America) for the war that he knows is inevitably
    coming. The rest is fairly accurate, if at times a bit hard to
    follow, but obviously of interest to those who like historical
    dramas.

    Released on Netflix streaming 01/21/22.

    Film Credits:
    <https://www.imdb.com/title/tt7475578/reference>

    What others are saying: <https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/munich_the_edge_of_war>

    THE LAST DUEL: Ridley Scott is no stranger to historical dramas,
    and so the quality of the visuals of THE LAST DUEL are not
    unexpected. But what we have here is basically RASHOMON, and while
    it is instructive to see how the characters' actions, expressions,
    and intonations are subtly different in each of the three versions,
    it does make for a long film. Fans of Riley Scott and historical
    dramas will want to see it; others should probably skip it. (The
    inquisitor at the trial seems to be a 14th century version of Rep.
    Todd Akin, and that and other aspects emphasize the attitudes
    towards women at that time.)

    Released 10/15/21; available on various streaming services and on
    DVD.

    Film Credits:
    <https://www.imdb.com/title/tt4244994/reference>

    What others are saying:
    <https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/the_last_duel_2021>

    And rather than just another couple of isolated mini-reviews, I
    also have a double feature to recommend: MRS. HENDERSON PRESENTS
    (2005) and FLORENCE FOSTER JENKINS (2016). Both are about music
    and musical theater during World War II, though the types of
    performances are a bit different, both are based on true stories,
    and both are about women. MRS. HENDERSON PRESENTS is about the
    woman who bought the Windmill Theatre in London and used it to
    stage musical revues which eventually included nude tableaux.
    FLORENCE FOSTER JENKINS is about a woman who loved music, supported
    it as a patron in New York, and had absolutely no talent, but never
    realized it.

    [-ecl]

    ===================================================================

    TOPIC: Holmdel Bell Labs Building (letter of comment by David
    G. Leeper)

    In response to Evelyn's pointer in the 02/18/22 issue of the MT
    VOID to a movie trailer featuring the Bell Labs building in Holmdel
    (NJ), David G. Leeper writes:

    That's pretty cool for a nearly 60-year-old building. I still like
    seeing pictures of the interior because it brings back a flood of
    memories! [-dgl]

    ===================================================================

    TOPIC: Star Trek Economics, THE PLANETS, and THE END OF ETERNITY
    (letter of comment by John Purcell)

    In response to comments on Star Trek economics in the 02/11/22 and
    02/18/22 issues of the MT VOID, John Purcell writes:

    Many thanks for the latest installment, and I really must tell you
    how much I enjoyed the back and forth letters between
    correspondents. Both exchanges (re: Star Trek Economics and THE
    TIME MACHINE) made me chuckle, especially Scott Dorsey's timeline
    of CLAMS -> PEOPLE -> CRABS. Definitely amusing. I have yet to
    mutate into a crab as I advance in age, but welcome the eventuality
    of being a qualified curmudgeon in a couple years. As for the Star
    Trek Economics, I completely agree with Gary McGrath's assessment
    of the Ferengi working very hard to appear honest while taking
    advantage of their customers. That always livened up ST:TNG and
    DSN episodes for me. Great characters, those Ferengi.

    In response to Greg Frederick's review of THE PLANETS and Evelyn's
    review of THE END OF ETERNITY in the 02/18/22 issue, John Purcell
    writes:

    As for the books reviewed herein, THE PLANETS is one I would enjoy
    reading and staring at the pretty pictures of our solar system's
    planetary wonders. The price for this book is likely
    astronomical--see what I did there?--but I'm sure it's well worth
    the investment. As for re-reading Asimov's THE END OF ETERNITY,
    Evelyn's conclusion is totally true. A few years back I was on a
    re-reading kick of Asimov's novels of the early 1950s, and pretty
    much didn't care for them as much as I once did. Well, considering
    I was in my mid-teens when I read this book and all the FOUNDATION
    books (as of the late 60s, that is) and the Daneel Olivaw books,
    they definitely do not age well, except for the Olivaw novels.
    Those were still fun to read as detective stories, but the others
    didn't tickle my imagination as they once did. So it goes.

    Thank you again for the issue, and keep the fires burning. [-jp]

    ===================================================================

    TOPIC: This Week's Reading (book comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)

    THE DISPOSSESSED by Ursula K. LeGuin (Harper Voyager, ISBN
    978-0-061-05488-4) postulates that the Odonians on Anarres do not
    use possessive pronouns, particularly in the first person. But
    there are some inconsistencies.

    LeGuin writes, "The singular forms of the possessive pronoun were
    used mostly for emphasis; idiom avoided them. Little children
    might say 'my mother,' but very soon they learned to say 'the
    mother.' Instead of 'my hand hurts,' it was 'the hand hurts me,'
    and so on; to say 'this one is mine and that's yours' in Pravic
    [the artificial language constructed for Anarres], one said , 'I
    use this one and you use that.'"

    But why *would* little children say 'my mother' unless they hear
    not just one person, but everyone around them saying it? And for
    that matter, why would Pravic--an invented language--even have the
    words "my", "mine", and so on?

    There are many uses of "his" in sections told from the main
    (Anarresti) character's point of view. The ones in narrative can
    be passed over, but there are also ones in dialogue, e.g., "He was
    in terrible pain, mostly from his hands." At one point he says
    something is "in my head", though at another he says, "The head is
    heavy." He also refers to "my teacher".

    It's true that some of these are after he has been on Urras a
    while: "He was accustomed to the constant use of the possessive
    pronoun by now, and spoke it without self-consciousness."

    Still, "I will do my own work for a while now!" seems an incredibly propertarian assertion for a lifelong Odonian.

    One problem is that the "possessive" pronoun does not always
    express possession. Another is that they can express possession in
    a non-propertarian sense. For example, "my house" expresses
    possession in a propertarian sense . "My age" does not express
    possession. And "my head" express possession, but in a
    non-propertarian sense. [-ecl]

    ===================================================================

    Mark Leeper
    mleeper@optonline.net


    He seems to have seen better days, as who has not
    Who has seen yesterday?
    --George Gordon, Lord Byron

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul Dormer@21:1/5 to evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com on Sun Feb 27 16:08:00 2022
    In article <cc6a6ef9-f14e-4e8e-8fda-20cbd975385en@googlegroups.com>, evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com () wrote:

    MRS. HENDERSON PRESENTS is about the
    woman who bought the Windmill Theatre in London

    Amusing fact. About the time this film came out, I went on holiday to
    Munich. The German title was "Lady Henderson präsentiert" not Frau
    Henderson which would be how I'd translate it (not that I have much
    German).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gary McGath@21:1/5 to eleeper@optonline.net on Sun Feb 27 16:52:03 2022
    On 2/27/22 9:23 AM, eleeper@optonline.net wrote:

    TOPIC: My Picks for Turner Classic Movies in March (comments by
    Mark R. Leeper)

    There have been amazing number of film adaptions of Robert Louis
    Stevenson' s mystery THE STRANGE CASE OF DR JEKYLL AND MR HYDE. It
    is a story that gives a bit of a chill without requiring much
    beyond makeup effects. There is one version that seems preferred
    over all the others. That is the 1931 version starring Frederic
    March doing both title roles: Jekyll and Hyde. It features the use
    of a makeup trick that allows Jekyll to become Hyde on screen (or
    stage) right in front of the audience. His Hyde is a really
    effective and ape-like.

    I like the 1920 version. John Barrymore did the transformation without
    makeup and without a cut, using just facial expressions and body language.

    In the original story, the identity of Jekyll and Hyde was the shock
    ending. I don't think any movie has ever done it that way. Today it
    would fail to surprise anyone.

    --
    Gary McGath http://www.mcgath.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Peter Trei@21:1/5 to Gary McGath on Mon Feb 28 22:02:26 2022
    On Sunday, February 27, 2022 at 1:52:06 PM UTC-8, Gary McGath wrote:
    On 2/27/22 9:23 AM, ele...@optonline.net wrote:

    TOPIC: My Picks for Turner Classic Movies in March (comments by
    Mark R. Leeper)

    There have been amazing number of film adaptions of Robert Louis
    Stevenson' s mystery THE STRANGE CASE OF DR JEKYLL AND MR HYDE. It
    is a story that gives a bit of a chill without requiring much
    beyond makeup effects. There is one version that seems preferred
    over all the others. That is the 1931 version starring Frederic
    March doing both title roles: Jekyll and Hyde. It features the use
    of a makeup trick that allows Jekyll to become Hyde on screen (or
    stage) right in front of the audience. His Hyde is a really
    effective and ape-like.
    I like the 1920 version. John Barrymore did the transformation without
    makeup and without a cut, using just facial expressions and body language.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B8i0U3nUi8E

    Pt

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dorothy J Heydt@21:1/5 to petertrei@gmail.com on Tue Mar 1 14:22:33 2022
    In article <4c813fc3-34e9-41c8-b51a-8b5e997012c3n@googlegroups.com>,
    Peter Trei <petertrei@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Sunday, February 27, 2022 at 1:52:06 PM UTC-8, Gary McGath wrote:
    On 2/27/22 9:23 AM, ele...@optonline.net wrote:

    TOPIC: My Picks for Turner Classic Movies in March (comments by
    Mark R. Leeper)

    There have been amazing number of film adaptions of Robert Louis
    Stevenson' s mystery THE STRANGE CASE OF DR JEKYLL AND MR HYDE. It
    is a story that gives a bit of a chill without requiring much
    beyond makeup effects. There is one version that seems preferred
    over all the others. That is the 1931 version starring Frederic
    March doing both title roles: Jekyll and Hyde. It features the use
    of a makeup trick that allows Jekyll to become Hyde on screen (or
    stage) right in front of the audience. His Hyde is a really
    effective and ape-like.
    I like the 1920 version. John Barrymore did the transformation without
    makeup and without a cut, using just facial expressions and body language.

    Without makeup or a cut on his face. There's both on the closeup
    of his hand. Hardly necessary.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B8i0U3nUi8E

    --
    Dorothy J. Heydt
    Vallejo, California
    djheydt at gmail dot com
    Www.kithrup.com/~djheydt/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)