https://www.1news.co.nz/2024/03/28/climate-scientist-jim-salinger-named-new-zealander-of-the-year/
He has been an outstanding advocate for recognition of his work on
climate change and taking responsibility for our environment - this is
a well-deserved honour.
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 14:02:27 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>You have given no evidence of fraud or fraudulent behaviour from
wrote:
https://www.1news.co.nz/2024/03/28/climate-scientist-jim-salinger-named-new-zealander-of-the-year/
He has been an outstanding advocate for recognition of his work on
climate change and taking responsibility for our environment - this is
a well-deserved honour.
Salinger is as fraudulent as man made climate change.
Bill.
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 18:54:47 +1300, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:You have never provided any proof that climate change is caused by man, you are deliberately trying to mislead again.
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 14:02:27 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>wrote:You have given no evidence of fraud or fraudulent behaviour from
https://www.1news.co.nz/2024/03/28/climate-scientist-jim-salinger-named-new-zealander-of-the-year/
He has been an outstanding advocate for recognition of his work on >>>climate change and taking responsibility for our environment - this is
a well-deserved honour.
Salinger is as fraudulent as man made climate change.
Bill.
either, so while technically I believe you are correct (neither are at
all fraudulent), you appear to be deliberately trying to mislead.
Climate change is of course real;Yes it is and you are a deliberate deceiver. The claim that Bill made is that man made climate change is fraudulent. You of course and without any compunction changed the message by removing the man made reference. Shame on you, you nasty devious politically indoctranted fool.
and is incapable of being fraudulent
- the issue of contention is the extent to which humans are
exacerbating climate change (for the worse) and the extent to which
those changes can now be mitigated. As for Jim Salinger, not everyone
has always agreed with him, but many have and I am not aware of any
claims that he has been fraudulent.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Which does not give any evidence of fraud or fraudulent behaviour. You
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 18:54:47 +1300, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:You have never provided any proof that climate change is caused by man, you are
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 14:02:27 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>wrote:You have given no evidence of fraud or fraudulent behaviour from
https://www.1news.co.nz/2024/03/28/climate-scientist-jim-salinger-named-new-zealander-of-the-year/
He has been an outstanding advocate for recognition of his work on >>>>climate change and taking responsibility for our environment - this is >>>>a well-deserved honour.
Salinger is as fraudulent as man made climate change.
Bill.
either, so while technically I believe you are correct (neither are at
all fraudulent), you appear to be deliberately trying to mislead.
deliberately trying to mislead again.
Yes it is and you are a deliberate deceiver. The claim that Bill made is that >man made climate change is fraudulent. You of course and without any >compunction changed the message by removing the man made reference. Shame on >you, you nasty devious politically indoctranted fool.
Climate change is of course real;
and is incapable of being fraudulent
- the issue of contention is the extent to which humans are
exacerbating climate change (for the worse) and the extent to which
those changes can now be mitigated. As for Jim Salinger, not everyone
has always agreed with him, but many have and I am not aware of any
claims that he has been fraudulent.
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 21:16:05 -0000 (UTC), TonyI accused nobody of fraud. If you want to talk to Bill then address him not me.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Which does not give any evidence of fraud or fraudulent behaviour. You
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 18:54:47 +1300, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:You have never provided any proof that climate change is caused by man, you >>are
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 14:02:27 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>>wrote:You have given no evidence of fraud or fraudulent behaviour from
https://www.1news.co.nz/2024/03/28/climate-scientist-jim-salinger-named-new-zealander-of-the-year/
He has been an outstanding advocate for recognition of his work on >>>>>climate change and taking responsibility for our environment - this is >>>>>a well-deserved honour.
Salinger is as fraudulent as man made climate change.
Bill.
either, so while technically I believe you are correct (neither are at >>>all fraudulent), you appear to be deliberately trying to mislead.
deliberately trying to mislead again.
should admit you were wrong and apologise.
As far as asking proof from me, I have told you on a number ofMost is due to nature and nobody has demonstrated otherwise.
occasions that I do not believe that man has caused all climate change
- some is due to nature - including earthquakes, meteorites, and
existing weather patterns etc.
However try putting "is climate change caused by man" into your search
engine and read what it says . . .
No it is you that in this thread specifically and in many others deliberately misinform and deliberately twist what others say - you are sick.Yes it is and you are a deliberate deceiver. The claim that Bill made is that >>man made climate change is fraudulent. You of course and without any >>compunction changed the message by removing the man made reference. Shame on >>you, you nasty devious politically indoctranted fool.
Climate change is of course real;
and is incapable of being fraudulent
- the issue of contention is the extent to which humans are
exacerbating climate change (for the worse) and the extent to which
those changes can now be mitigated. As for Jim Salinger, not everyone
has always agreed with him, but many have and I am not aware of any >>>claims that he has been fraudulent.
Since you insist on analysing bits of a sentence as if they are
complete, you consistently misunderstand longer sentences - try
getting someone else to explain it to you - your deliberate distortion
and mis-representation of posts of others is starting to appear
deliberate rather than just a deficiency in your understanding.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Agreed. And Salinger is no expert anyway. He just prints a heap of stuff and gets noticed.
https://www.1news.co.nz/2024/03/28/climate-scientist-jim-salinger-named-new-zealander-of-the-year/
He has been an outstanding advocate for recognition of his work on
climate change and taking responsibility for our environment - this is
a well-deserved honour.
Sorry New Zealander of the year lost all credibility last year when
that gave that gay, women hating import that worked for the
Herald who I believe now works for the labor Party.
https://www.1news.co.nz/2024/03/28/climate-scientist-jim-salinger-named-new-zealander-of-the-year/
He has been an outstanding advocate for recognition of his work on
climate change and taking responsibility for our environment - this is
a well-deserved honour.
Mutley <mutley2000@hotmail.com> wrote:That could apply to you on nz.general, Tony, but it is not clear just
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Agreed. And Salinger is no expert anyway. He just prints a heap of stuff and >gets noticed.
https://www.1news.co.nz/2024/03/28/climate-scientist-jim-salinger-named-new-zealander-of-the-year/
He has been an outstanding advocate for recognition of his work on >>>climate change and taking responsibility for our environment - this is
a well-deserved honour.
Sorry New Zealander of the year lost all credibility last year when
that gave that gay, women hating import that worked for the
Herald who I believe now works for the labor Party.
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 23:57:48 -0000 (UTC), TonyIt is clear to everybody that matters.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Mutley <mutley2000@hotmail.com> wrote:That could apply to you on nz.general, Tony, but it is not clear just
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Agreed. And Salinger is no expert anyway. He just prints a heap of stuff and >>gets noticed.
https://www.1news.co.nz/2024/03/28/climate-scientist-jim-salinger-named-new-zealander-of-the-year/
He has been an outstanding advocate for recognition of his work on >>>>climate change and taking responsibility for our environment - this is >>>>a well-deserved honour.
Sorry New Zealander of the year lost all credibility last year when
that gave that gay, women hating import that worked for the
Herald who I believe now works for the labor Party.
who you and Mutley are slagging as a gay, women hating import - Rangi >Matamua, or tipene O'Regan, or Siouxsie Wiles, or . . .?
I am sorry if you feel you never get noticed, Tony; I do try to cheerOh you poor wee dear. Have you changed your gender again? Don't worry, we are broad minded here.
you up a bit, but nz.general does not really measure up to New
Zealander of the Year, does it.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 109:35:44 |
| Calls: | 6,662 |
| Files: | 12,209 |
| Messages: | 5,335,713 |