Another Story from scoop,Swarbrick and most of her colleagues don't care about the birds or about the planet in general. They are marxists bent on running the world hidden behind a false green image. They would wear their jackboots in public if they could do so without giving the game away.
https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO2403/S00159/kill-the-birds-faster-swarbrick-shows-contempt-for-famers.htm
The connection here is that in Europe the farmers have been staging >demostrations in several countries about the proposed controls, no more >fertilizer.
The Greens are starting along the road to divide and rule between the farmers >and the
city folks. Farmers are killing birds so farmers are bad people, then we
ramp things up a notch. History shows us how it is done.
Another Story from scoop,
https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO2403/S00159/kill-the-birds-faster-swarbrick-shows-contempt-for-famers.htm
The connection here is that in Europe the farmers have been staging >demostrations in several countries about the proposed controls, no more >fertilizer.
The Greens are starting along the road to divide and rule between the farmers and the
city folks. Farmers are killing birds so farmers are bad people, then we
ramp things up a notch. History shows us how it is done.
On 21 Mar 2024 22:09:17 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:You are infantile if you think that changing the subject so slyly and deliberately will be do any good.
Another Story from scoop,
https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO2403/S00159/kill-the-birds-faster-swarbrick-shows-contempt-for-famers.htm
The connection here is that in Europe the farmers have been staging >>demostrations in several countries about the proposed controls, no more >>fertilizer.
The Greens are starting along the road to divide and rule between the farmers >>and the
city folks. Farmers are killing birds so farmers are bad people, then we >>ramp things up a notch. History shows us how it is done.
Political party press releases are sometimes more speculation than
substance. Another one from the same day:
https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA2403/S00091/minister-confirms-labours-reduced-ruc-rate-for-phevs.htm
which points out that National were going off track, but were given an >opportunity to get slightly less off track - then this release: >https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA2403/S00086/minister-confirms-reduced-ruc-rate-for-phevs.htm
pretends that National were looking to be corrected, but also
indicates they still don't really understand the science - they
identify that charges should be based on distance and weight (missing >emissions this time!), but even then they didn't get it right - some
of the all electric vehicles are much heavier than others - road user
charges should be more variable than they were prepared to go, still
the final result is not as bad as if National had not been shamed into >recognising they were off track . . .
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:No change of subject - I think it is good that National (and it was
On 21 Mar 2024 22:09:17 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:You are infantile if you think that changing the subject so slyly and >deliberately will be do any good.
Another Story from scoop,
https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO2403/S00159/kill-the-birds-faster-swarbrick-shows-contempt-for-famers.htm
The connection here is that in Europe the farmers have been staging >>>demostrations in several countries about the proposed controls, no more >>>fertilizer.
The Greens are starting along the road to divide and rule between the farmers
and the
city folks. Farmers are killing birds so farmers are bad people, then we >>>ramp things up a notch. History shows us how it is done.
Political party press releases are sometimes more speculation than >>substance. Another one from the same day:
which points out that National were going off track, but were given an >>opportunity to get slightly less off track - then this release: >>https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA2403/S00086/minister-confirms-reduced-ruc-rate-for-phevs.htmhttps://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA2403/S00091/minister-confirms-labours-reduced-ruc-rate-for-phevs.htm
pretends that National were looking to be corrected, but also
indicates they still don't really understand the science - they
identify that charges should be based on distance and weight (missing >>emissions this time!), but even then they didn't get it right - some
of the all electric vehicles are much heavier than others - road user >>charges should be more variable than they were prepared to go, still
the final result is not as bad as if National had not been shamed into >>recognising they were off track . . .
I think you are deranged or sociopathic, probably the latter.
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 04:12:41 -0000 (UTC), TonyComplete change of subject. Start a new thread.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:No change of subject - I think it is good that National (and it was
On 21 Mar 2024 22:09:17 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:You are infantile if you think that changing the subject so slyly and >>deliberately will be do any good.
Another Story from scoop,
https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO2403/S00159/kill-the-birds-faster-swarbrick-shows-contempt-for-famers.htm
The connection here is that in Europe the farmers have been staging >>>>demostrations in several countries about the proposed controls, no more >>>>fertilizer.
The Greens are starting along the road to divide and rule between the >>>>farmers
and the
city folks. Farmers are killing birds so farmers are bad people, then we >>>>ramp things up a notch. History shows us how it is done.
Political party press releases are sometimes more speculation than >>>substance. Another one from the same day:
which points out that National were going off track, but were given an >>>opportunity to get slightly less off track - then this release: >>>https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA2403/S00086/minister-confirms-reduced-ruc-rate-for-phevs.htmhttps://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA2403/S00091/minister-confirms-labours-reduced-ruc-rate-for-phevs.htm
pretends that National were looking to be corrected, but also
indicates they still don't really understand the science - they
identify that charges should be based on distance and weight (missing >>>emissions this time!), but even then they didn't get it right - some
of the all electric vehicles are much heavier than others - road user >>>charges should be more variable than they were prepared to go, still
the final result is not as bad as if National had not been shamed into >>>recognising they were off track . . .
I think you are deranged or sociopathic, probably the latter.
National this time rather than one of the other Government Parties)
was willing to accept that what they proposed could be improved and
accepted a change put forward from Labour.
There was of course no contempt for famers, as ACT claimed in theirI don't expect that either - you on the other hand do not have a thought in your head that is not driven by your party.
press release, and no attempt to take away property rights, or to
separate farmers from other people. Still they are a small party and
feel they need to make a lot of noise and make up conflicts that do
not exist just to be noticed. On that premise however, I guess you are >probably closer to ACT than to National, Tony - but there is no need
for you to be ashamed of that - just don't expect he majority of the >population to agree with you . . .
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 123:07:14 |
| Calls: | 6,662 |
| Files: | 12,212 |
| Messages: | 5,334,693 |