Now he’s saying Luxon was “misinformed by the media” over his “Nazi >Germany” comments.It is clear that you are opposed to any government that is to the right of Karl Marx and that makes your opinions nonsense.
That’s the kind of thing you discuss behind closed doors, then come out
and present a united front. Airing your dirty linen in public just hurts >confidence in the entire Government.
Right from the beginning of the Coalition, it was clear Peters was the >weakest link.
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
Now he’s saying Luxon was “misinformed by the media? over his “Nazi >>Germany? comments.It is clear that you are opposed to any government that is to the right of Karl
That’s the kind of thing you discuss behind closed doors, then come out >>and present a united front. Airing your dirty linen in public just hurts >>confidence in the entire Government.
Right from the beginning of the Coalition, it was clear Peters was the >>weakest link.
Marx and that makes your opinions nonsense.
Right from the beginning of the Coalition, it was clear Peters was the >weakest link.
Now he’s saying Luxon was “misinformed by the media” over his “Nazi Germany” comments.
That’s the kind of thing you discuss behind closed doors, then come out
and present a united front. Airing your dirty linen in public just hurts confidence in the entire Government.
Right from the beginning of the Coalition, it was clear Peters was the weakest link.
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 05:47:20 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
Now heâs saying Luxon was âmisinformed by the mediaâ? over his âNaziIt is clear that you are opposed to any government that is to the right of Karl
Germanyâ? comments.
Thatâs the kind of thing you discuss behind closed doors, then come out >>>and present a united front. Airing your dirty linen in public just hurts >>>confidence in the entire Government.
Right from the beginning of the Coalition, it was clear Peters was the >>>weakest link.
Marx and that makes your opinions nonsense.
We seem to often have coalition governments these days - not all
Coalitions will to the right of centre or to the left of centre.
Wherever the government lies in that dimension, there will always be a weakest link, and we are unlikely to all agree on who that is. I am
sure you can understand why some National Party supporters would have preferred that it to have been possible to have had less than three
parties in the coalition. Who do you see as the strongest link in the
current coalition, and who the weakest, Tony?
On 2024-03-20, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 05:47:20 -0000 (UTC), TonyThere is no I in team, which is what a coalition is.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
Now he??s saying Luxon was ??misinformed by the media?? over his ??Nazi >>>>Germany?? comments.It is clear that you are opposed to any government that is to the right of Karl
That??s the kind of thing you discuss behind closed doors, then come out >>>>and present a united front. Airing your dirty linen in public just hurts >>>>confidence in the entire Government.
Right from the beginning of the Coalition, it was clear Peters was the >>>>weakest link.
Marx and that makes your opinions nonsense.
We seem to often have coalition governments these days - not all
Coalitions will to the right of centre or to the left of centre.
Wherever the government lies in that dimension, there will always be a
weakest link, and we are unlikely to all agree on who that is. I am
sure you can understand why some National Party supporters would have
preferred that it to have been possible to have had less than three
parties in the coalition. Who do you see as the strongest link in the
current coalition, and who the weakest, Tony?
New Zealand still has not totally got it. MMP is supposed to great a more >balanced reprenstation than FFP and as a Government much more like the >public.
Concentrate on the issues, not the person is a good start.
Now he’s saying Luxon was “misinformed by the media” over his “Nazi Germany” comments.
That’s the kind of thing you discuss behind closed doors, then come out
and present a united front. Airing your dirty linen in public just hurts confidence in the entire Government.
Right from the beginning of the Coalition, it was clear Peters was the weakest link.
New Zealand still has not totally got it. MMP is supposed to great a more >balanced reprenstation than FFP and as a Government much more like the >public.
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 05:47:20 -0000 (UTC), TonyNothing to do with the topic. Start your own thread.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
Now he’s saying Luxon was “misinformed by the media? over his “Nazi >>>Germany? comments.It is clear that you are opposed to any government that is to the right of >>Karl
That’s the kind of thing you discuss behind closed doors, then come out >>>and present a united front. Airing your dirty linen in public just hurts >>>confidence in the entire Government.
Right from the beginning of the Coalition, it was clear Peters was the >>>weakest link.
Marx and that makes your opinions nonsense.
We seem to often have coalition governments these days - not all
Coalitions will to the right of centre or to the left of centre.
Wherever the government lies in that dimension, there will always be a >weakest link, and we are unlikely to all agree on who that is. I am
sure you can understand why some National Party supporters would have >preferred that it to have been possible to have had less than three
parties in the coalition. Who do you see as the strongest link in the
current coalition, and who the weakest, Tony?
Now hes saying Luxon was misinformed by the media over his Nazi
Germany comments.
Thats the kind of thing you discuss behind closed doors, then come out
and present a united front. Airing your dirty linen in public just hurts >confidence in the entire Government.
Right from the beginning of the Coalition, it was clear Peters was the >weakest link.
[Ranty McRantFace]
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 05:47:20 -0000 (UTC), Tony wrote:
There is a term for your reaction to the plain facts I was stating:Since you have deleted what transpired before your abusive post I can only guess that you have paid me the compliment of being correct and you are admitting your bias.
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 05:12:13 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro ><ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
Now hes saying Luxon was misinformed by the media over his Nazi >>Germany comments.
Thats the kind of thing you discuss behind closed doors, then come out
and present a united front. Airing your dirty linen in public just hurts >>confidence in the entire Government.
Right from the beginning of the Coalition, it was clear Peters was the >>weakest link.
It was always clear that Peters was the greatest threat to the
political stability of the current Government. Those of us who have
been around since Peters first came to Parliament in 1979 will be well
aware of why.
We should remember that Luxon is now as experienced as Peters was in
1982. It is also worth remembering that everyone except National
ruled out Peters as a Coalition partner. Yes this includes ACT, and
in the current Government ACT and NZF are partners to National but not
each other.
If Luxon has not already sought advice from Dame Jenny Shipley and >potentially Helen Clark and Jim Bolger on how to get rid of Winston
should the occasion demand it, then he should.
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 05:47:20 -0000 (UTC), Tony wrote:Since you have deleted what transpired before your abusive post I can only >guess that you have paid me the compliment of being correct and you are >admitting your bias.
There is a term for your reaction to the plain facts I was stating:
On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 00:46:01 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 05:47:20 -0000 (UTC), Tony wrote:Since you have deleted what transpired before your abusive post I can only >>guess that you have paid me the compliment of being correct and you are >>admitting your bias.
There is a term for your reaction to the plain facts I was stating:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 18:43:06 -0000 (UTC), TonyOff topic and idiotic question.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 05:47:20 -0000 (UTC), TonyNothing to do with the topic. Start your own thread.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
Now he’s saying Luxon was “misinformed by the media? over his >>>>>“NaziIt is clear that you are opposed to any government that is to the right of >>>>Karl
Germany? comments.
That’s the kind of thing you discuss behind closed doors, then come out >>>>>and present a united front. Airing your dirty linen in public just hurts >>>>>confidence in the entire Government.
Right from the beginning of the Coalition, it was clear Peters was the >>>>>weakest link.
Marx and that makes your opinions nonsense.
We seem to often have coalition governments these days - not all >>>Coalitions will to the right of centre or to the left of centre.
Wherever the government lies in that dimension, there will always be a >>>weakest link, and we are unlikely to all agree on who that is. I am
sure you can understand why some National Party supporters would have >>>preferred that it to have been possible to have had less than three >>>parties in the coalition. Who do you see as the strongest link in the >>>current coalition, and who the weakest, Tony?
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:That is a better post, Tony, but your contribution did not go quite
On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 00:46:01 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 05:47:20 -0000 (UTC), Tony wrote:
There is a term for your reaction to the plain facts I was stating:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Your comment is therefore also off topic, Tony. Do you agree or
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 05:47:20 -0000 (UTC), TonyNothing to do with the topic. Start your own thread.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
Now he’s saying Luxon was “misinformed by the media? over his “Nazi >>>>Germany? comments.It is clear that you are opposed to any government that is to the right of >>>Karl
That’s the kind of thing you discuss behind closed doors, then come out >>>>and present a united front. Airing your dirty linen in public just hurts >>>>confidence in the entire Government.
Right from the beginning of the Coalition, it was clear Peters was the >>>>weakest link.
Marx and that makes your opinions nonsense.
We seem to often have coalition governments these days - not all
Coalitions will to the right of centre or to the left of centre.
Wherever the government lies in that dimension, there will always be a >>weakest link, and we are unlikely to all agree on who that is. I am
sure you can understand why some National Party supporters would have >>preferred that it to have been possible to have had less than three
parties in the coalition. Who do you see as the strongest link in the >>current coalition, and who the weakest, Tony?
On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 02:46:45 -0000 (UTC), TonyYou couldn't improve the stink of your dogshit abuse and lies if you tried.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:That is a better post, Tony, but your contribution did not go quite
On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 00:46:01 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 05:47:20 -0000 (UTC), Tony wrote:
There is a term for your reaction to the plain facts I was stating:
far enough to go from negative to zero impact - I have improved it for
you . . .
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 118:00:38 |
| Calls: | 6,662 |
| Files: | 12,209 |
| Messages: | 5,334,287 |