• Justice?

    From Tony@21:1/5 to All on Tue Mar 5 19:57:17 2024
    XPost: nz.politics

    https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/politics/posie-parker-protest-act-responds-to-tragedy-of-discharge-without-conviction-after-71-year-old-woman-punched/NY5MM62TOFGMJO3IOBMXYGYVWI/
    A 71 year old woman hit 3 times in the face by a 21 year old man when she was at a peaceful rally (he was the protester, not her). Is that justice?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to lizandtony@orcon.net.nz on Wed Mar 6 09:26:18 2024
    On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 19:57:17 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/politics/posie-parker-protest-act-responds-to-tragedy-of-discharge-without-conviction-after-71-year-old-woman-punched/NY5MM62TOFGMJO3IOBMXYGYVWI/
    A 71 year old woman hit 3 times in the face by a 21 year old man when she was >at a peaceful rally (he was the protester, not her). Is that justice?

    It is hard to tell what happened, isn't it. https://twitter.com/A1Retta/status/1764523316130598955 https://www.nzherald.co.nz/kahu/nana-bashed-at-posie-parker-rally-outraged-over-sentence-of-her-young-attacker/IP644WFAENBM5CWUWSMJCZNVQA/
    https://twitter.com/A1Retta/status/1764818549724586004

    Balancing free speech against the potential for harm caused by
    extremism is not an easy call - allowing Parker to enter New Zealand
    was consistent with that principle, but free speech does need to be
    linked to responsibility and respect for the opinions of others. It
    appears from these videos that respect for the opinions of others was
    not strong on either side of this conflict.

    I do not know if there were other prosecutions, but there does not
    appear to be any reason to doubt that both the police and the courts
    have not dealt properly with respect to their different duties to see
    justice done - both would have had difficult decisions to make, and
    they may well have had many other phone videos of not just this but
    other physical clashes. There was provocation on both sides but
    sometimes there is a price to be paid for basic human rights; and this
    case may have illustrated that principle.

    So was it justice? I cannot be certain, because I was not there and
    did not hear or see all the evidence - under such circumstances I
    believe it is best to have trust in our police and courts systems. On
    the balance of probabilities, yes, justice was served.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Wed Mar 6 00:52:35 2024
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 19:57:17 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/politics/posie-parker-protest-act-responds-to-tragedy-of-discharge-without-conviction-after-71-year-old-woman-punched/NY5MM62TOFGMJO3IOBMXYGYVWI/
    A 71 year old woman hit 3 times in the face by a 21 year old man when she was >>at a peaceful rally (he was the protester, not her). Is that justice?

    It is hard to tell what happened, isn't it. >https://twitter.com/A1Retta/status/1764523316130598955 >https://www.nzherald.co.nz/kahu/nana-bashed-at-posie-parker-rally-outraged-over-sentence-of-her-young-attacker/IP644WFAENBM5CWUWSMJCZNVQA/
    https://twitter.com/A1Retta/status/1764818549724586004

    Balancing free speech against the potential for harm caused by
    extremism is not an easy call - allowing Parker to enter New Zealand
    was consistent with that principle, but free speech does need to be
    linked to responsibility and respect for the opinions of others. It
    appears from these videos that respect for the opinions of others was
    not strong on either side of this conflict.

    I do not know if there were other prosecutions, but there does not
    appear to be any reason to doubt that both the police and the courts
    have not dealt properly with respect to their different duties to see >justice done - both would have had difficult decisions to make, and
    they may well have had many other phone videos of not just this but
    other physical clashes. There was provocation on both sides but
    sometimes there is a price to be paid for basic human rights; and this
    case may have illustrated that principle.

    So was it justice? I cannot be certain, because I was not there and
    did not hear or see all the evidence - under such circumstances I
    believe it is best to have trust in our police and courts systems. On
    the balance of probabilities, yes, justice was served.
    The judge found the offence had been committed. What is at stake is the lack of conviction, not the offending.
    Perhaps you could waste less time and actually address the issue.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to lizandtony@orcon.net.nz on Wed Mar 6 16:09:12 2024
    On Wed, 6 Mar 2024 00:52:35 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 19:57:17 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
    https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/politics/posie-parker-protest-act-responds-to-tragedy-of-discharge-without-conviction-after-71-year-old-woman-punched/NY5MM62TOFGMJO3IOBMXYGYVWI/
    A 71 year old woman hit 3 times in the face by a 21 year old man when she was
    at a peaceful rally (he was the protester, not her). Is that justice?

    It is hard to tell what happened, isn't it. >>https://twitter.com/A1Retta/status/1764523316130598955 >>https://www.nzherald.co.nz/kahu/nana-bashed-at-posie-parker-rally-outraged-over-sentence-of-her-young-attacker/IP644WFAENBM5CWUWSMJCZNVQA/
    https://twitter.com/A1Retta/status/1764818549724586004

    Balancing free speech against the potential for harm caused by
    extremism is not an easy call - allowing Parker to enter New Zealand
    was consistent with that principle, but free speech does need to be
    linked to responsibility and respect for the opinions of others. It
    appears from these videos that respect for the opinions of others was
    not strong on either side of this conflict.

    I do not know if there were other prosecutions, but there does not
    appear to be any reason to doubt that both the police and the courts
    have not dealt properly with respect to their different duties to see >>justice done - both would have had difficult decisions to make, and
    they may well have had many other phone videos of not just this but
    other physical clashes. There was provocation on both sides but
    sometimes there is a price to be paid for basic human rights; and this
    case may have illustrated that principle.

    So was it justice? I cannot be certain, because I was not there and
    did not hear or see all the evidence - under such circumstances I
    believe it is best to have trust in our police and courts systems. On
    the balance of probabilities, yes, justice was served.
    The judge found the offence had been committed. What is at stake is the lack of
    conviction, not the offending.
    Perhaps you could waste less time and actually address the issue.

    I was not there and did not hear or see all the evidence. A discharge
    without conviction is a decision by an experienced judge based on all
    the evidence. The decision was certainly one that has been given in
    the past in others cases, and doubtless will be again in others, where evidence, and all factors presented to the court are taken into
    account. I was not present at the protest or at the court; I have not
    seen or heard any reasons to doubt that the decision represented
    justice as far as the Judge was concerned, and you have provided no
    evidence to suggest that it was wrong. If there is an appeal we may
    hear legal arguments relating to the case, and possibly more evidence,
    but that does see unlikely. What evidence do you offer to suggest that
    a mistake may have been made, Tony?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BR@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 6 18:13:27 2024
    On Wed, 06 Mar 2024 09:26:18 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    Balancing free speech against the potential for harm caused by
    extremism is not an easy call -

    OK, so you are in favour of censorship. No surprises there.

    allowing Parker to enter New Zealand
    was consistent with that principle, but free speech does need to be
    linked to responsibility and respect for the opinions of others.

    I didn't see much in the way of respect for the opinions of those who
    came to hear Ms Parker speak.

    So was it justice? I cannot be certain, because I was not there and
    did not hear or see all the evidence - under such circumstances I
    believe it is best to have trust in our police and courts systems.

    How much evidence do you need? A man in his 20s was filmed punching an
    elderly lady very hard in the face at least three times. You think he
    didn't do it?

    On the balance of probabilities, yes, justice was served.

    How about the man who punched James Shaw and was sentenced to prison.
    Was justice served on that occasion?

    Bill.

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
    https://www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Wed Mar 6 04:45:40 2024
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Wed, 6 Mar 2024 00:52:35 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 19:57:17 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
    https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/politics/posie-parker-protest-act-responds-to-tragedy-of-discharge-without-conviction-after-71-year-old-woman-punched/NY5MM62TOFGMJO3IOBMXYGYVWI/
    A 71 year old woman hit 3 times in the face by a 21 year old man when she >>>>was
    at a peaceful rally (he was the protester, not her). Is that justice?

    It is hard to tell what happened, isn't it. >>>https://twitter.com/A1Retta/status/1764523316130598955 >>>https://www.nzherald.co.nz/kahu/nana-bashed-at-posie-parker-rally-outraged-over-sentence-of-her-young-attacker/IP644WFAENBM5CWUWSMJCZNVQA/
    https://twitter.com/A1Retta/status/1764818549724586004

    Balancing free speech against the potential for harm caused by
    extremism is not an easy call - allowing Parker to enter New Zealand
    was consistent with that principle, but free speech does need to be >>>linked to responsibility and respect for the opinions of others. It >>>appears from these videos that respect for the opinions of others was
    not strong on either side of this conflict.

    I do not know if there were other prosecutions, but there does not
    appear to be any reason to doubt that both the police and the courts
    have not dealt properly with respect to their different duties to see >>>justice done - both would have had difficult decisions to make, and
    they may well have had many other phone videos of not just this but
    other physical clashes. There was provocation on both sides but
    sometimes there is a price to be paid for basic human rights; and this >>>case may have illustrated that principle.

    So was it justice? I cannot be certain, because I was not there and
    did not hear or see all the evidence - under such circumstances I
    believe it is best to have trust in our police and courts systems. On
    the balance of probabilities, yes, justice was served.
    The judge found the offence had been committed. What is at stake is the lack >>of
    conviction, not the offending.
    Perhaps you could waste less time and actually address the issue.

    I was not there and did not hear or see all the evidence. A discharge
    without conviction is a decision by an experienced judge based on all
    the evidence. The decision was certainly one that has been given in
    the past in others cases, and doubtless will be again in others, where >evidence, and all factors presented to the court are taken into
    account. I was not present at the protest or at the court; I have not
    seen or heard any reasons to doubt that the decision represented
    justice as far as the Judge was concerned, and you have provided no
    evidence to suggest that it was wrong. If there is an appeal we may
    hear legal arguments relating to the case, and possibly more evidence,
    but that does see unlikely. What evidence do you offer to suggest that
    a mistake may have been made, Tony?
    You simply cannot keep to topic. You have not read anything that anybody has written about this because you made your mind up before the event happened. Now you will say that is nonsense and silly but I sugget you think about it - and maybe the penny will finally drop but I doubt it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)