https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/350192873/stuart-nash-claims-labour-cabinet-softened-its-gang-asset-seizure-policy

Well darn it all a Labour (ex) Minster getting hard on gangs.

"Also there is a law in place, created by Labour, The changes to the
Criminal Proceeds (Recovery) Act allowed police to go after gang
leaders' properties, cars, bikes and bling, providing the assets were valued
at $30,000 or above."

To my mind all we need is the will power to take back the illegal assets.

This is an artcle worth while reading as it gives some background.

Rich advocates for the Labour side of things and yet I can not remember Rich drawing our attention to this act, which shows that Labour was working on
the case and creating legislation.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote: >https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/350192873/stuart-nash-claims-labour-cabinet-softened-its-gang-asset-seizure-policy

Well darn it all a Labour (ex) Minster getting hard on gangs.

"Also there is a law in place, created by Labour, The changes to the
Criminal Proceeds (Recovery) Act allowed police to go after gang
leaders' properties, cars, bikes and bling, providing the assets were valued >at $30,000 or above."

To my mind all we need is the will power to take back the illegal assets.

This is an artcle worth while reading as it gives some background.

Rich advocates for the Labour side of things and yet I can not remember Rich >drawing our attention to this act, which shows that Labour was working on
the case and creating legislation.

If true it is another disgrace.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)