https://www.bassettbrashandhide.com/post/barry-brill-an-absurd-ardern-ambition >And we have to fix this crap - what a terrible person she is.
On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 20:45:10 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>Ardern is, apparently, female - not that I care. Rich is obviously some sort of gender that is yet to be defined.
wrote:
https://www.bassettbrashandhide.com/post/barry-brill-an-absurd-ardern-ambition
And we have to fix this crap - what a terrible person she is.
I agree I am crap, Tony, and Barry Brill is male - you are getting
confused.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Changing a previous post is appalling behaviour - as those that have
On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 20:45:10 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>
wrote:
And we have to fix this crap - what a terrible person she is.https://www.bassettbrashandhide.com/post/barry-brill-an-absurd-ardern-ambition
I agree I am crap, Tony, and Barry Brill is male - you are getting >>confused.
Ardern is, apparently, female - not that I care. Rich is obviously some sort of
gender that is yet to be defined.
I was not referring to Brill you moron.
On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 23:51:36 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>Not at all - your deliberate changing what I and others post by going off deliberately off topic is much worse.
wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Changing a previous post is appalling behaviour
On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 20:45:10 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>
wrote:
And we have to fix this crap - what a terrible person she is.https://www.bassettbrashandhide.com/post/barry-brill-an-absurd-ardern-ambition
I agree I am crap, Tony, and Barry Brill is male - you are getting >>>confused.
- as those that haveNo - you deliberately twisted what I wrote that is truly appalling. but not new.
any sense at all can see that my post said:
"I agree I am crap, Tony, and Barry Brill is male - you are getting >confused."
If you had meant that the article was not crap you should have been
clearer - posting a url and saying we must fix this crap clearly
indicated that you regarded the material at that url to be crap - all
I did was agree, and point out that the author is male. .
Ardern is, apparently, female - not that I care. Rich is obviously some sort >>of
gender that is yet to be defined.
I was not referring to Brill you moron.
She’s long gone from political power, yet a powerful woman still scaresNo, she never has. I have worked for a much smarter woman than Ardern who had a few other attributes Ardern lacks. My boss was not just intelligent but had integrity, she didn't need to lie and she was not afraid to meet people who disagreed with her. None of thos attributes exist in Ardern (or you apparantly). Now, about integrity, how is your faux Hamilton business doing?
the shit out of you, doesn’t she?
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Readers of nz.general should take note that Tony more than once
On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 23:51:36 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>Not at all - your deliberate changing what I and others post by going off >deliberately off topic is much worse.
wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Changing a previous post is appalling behaviour
On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 20:45:10 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>
wrote:
And we have to fix this crap - what a terrible person she is.https://www.bassettbrashandhide.com/post/barry-brill-an-absurd-ardern-ambition
I agree I am crap, Tony, and Barry Brill is male - you are getting >>>>confused.
- as those that haveNo - you deliberately twisted what I wrote that is truly appalling. but not new.
any sense at all can see that my post said:
"I agree I am crap, Tony, and Barry Brill is male - you are getting >>confused."
If you had meant that the article was not crap you should have been
clearer - posting a url and saying we must fix this crap clearly
indicated that you regarded the material at that url to be crap - all
I did was agree, and point out that the author is male. .
Abuse gone for now.
Ardern is, apparently, female - not that I care. Rich is obviously some sort >>>of
gender that is yet to be defined.
I was not referring to Brill you moron.
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
She’s long gone from political power, yet a powerful woman still scares >>the shit out of you, doesn’t she?No, she never has. I have worked for a much smarter woman than Ardern who had a
few other attributes Ardern lacks. My boss was not just intelligent but had >integrity, she didn't need to lie and she was not afraid to meet people who >disagreed with her. None of thos attributes exist in Ardern (or you >apparantly). Now, about integrity, how is your faux Hamilton business doing?
On Sat, 17 Feb 2024 02:14:22 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>Rich - they know what you are and what you deserve so you can forget your infantile holier-than-thou garbage. You are a lying, abusive, coward. Period.
wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Readers of nz.general should take note that Tony more than once
On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 23:51:36 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>Not at all - your deliberate changing what I and others post by going off >>deliberately off topic is much worse.
wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Changing a previous post is appalling behaviour
On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 20:45:10 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> >>>>>wrote:
And we have to fix this crap - what a terrible person she is.https://www.bassettbrashandhide.com/post/barry-brill-an-absurd-ardern-ambition
I agree I am crap, Tony, and Barry Brill is male - you are getting >>>>>confused.
- as those that haveNo - you deliberately twisted what I wrote that is truly appalling. but not >>new.
any sense at all can see that my post said:
"I agree I am crap, Tony, and Barry Brill is male - you are getting >>>confused."
If you had meant that the article was not crap you should have been >>>clearer - posting a url and saying we must fix this crap clearly >>>indicated that you regarded the material at that url to be crap - all
I did was agree, and point out that the author is male. .
Abuse gone for now.
Ardern is, apparently, female - not that I care. Rich is obviously some >>>>sort
of
gender that is yet to be defined.
I was not referring to Brill you moron.
changed the record of previous posts by another poster to
substantially change the meaning, and also often deletes posts that he >disagrees with.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:changed the record of previous posts by another poster to
On Sat, 17 Feb 2024 06:02:17 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>Rich - they know what you are and what you deserve so you can forget your >infantile holier-than-thou garbage. You are a lying, abusive, coward. Period. Readers of nz.general should take note that Tony more than once
wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:Readers of nz.general should take note that Tony more than once
She’s long gone from political power, yet a powerful woman still scares >>>>the shit out of you, doesn’t she?No, she never has. I have worked for a much smarter woman than Ardern who had
a
few other attributes Ardern lacks. My boss was not just intelligent but had >>>integrity, she didn't need to lie and she was not afraid to meet people who >>>disagreed with her. None of thos attributes exist in Ardern (or you >>>apparantly). Now, about integrity, how is your faux Hamilton business doing? >>
changed the record of previous posts by another poster to
substantially change the meaning, and also often deletes posts that he >>disagrees with.
On Sat, 17 Feb 2024 08:05:44 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>
wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:changed the record of previous posts by another poster to
On Sat, 17 Feb 2024 06:02:17 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>Rich - they know what you are and what you deserve so you can forget your >>infantile holier-than-thou garbage. You are a lying, abusive, coward. Period. >Readers of nz.general should take note that Tony more than once
wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
She’s long gone from political power, yet a powerful woman still scares >>>>>the shit out of you, doesn’t she?No, she never has. I have worked for a much smarter woman than Ardern who >>>>had
a
few other attributes Ardern lacks. My boss was not just intelligent but had >>>>integrity, she didn't need to lie and she was not afraid to meet people who >>>>disagreed with her. None of thos attributes exist in Ardern (or you >>>>apparantly). Now, about integrity, how is your faux Hamilton business doing?
Readers of nz.general should take note that Tony more than once
changed the record of previous posts by another poster to
substantially change the meaning, and also often deletes posts that he >>>disagrees with.
substantially change the meaning, and also often deletes posts that he >disagrees with.
On Sat, 17 Feb 2024 02:14:22 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>New here but have watched for a while.
wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Readers of nz.general should take note that Tony more than once
On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 23:51:36 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>Not at all - your deliberate changing what I and others post by going off
wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Changing a previous post is appalling behaviour
On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 20:45:10 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>
wrote:
https://www.bassettbrashandhide.com/post/barry-brill-an-absurd-ardern-ambition
And we have to fix this crap - what a terrible person she is.
I agree I am crap, Tony, and Barry Brill is male - you are getting
confused.
deliberately off topic is much worse.
- as those that haveNo - you deliberately twisted what I wrote that is truly appalling. but not new.
any sense at all can see that my post said:
"I agree I am crap, Tony, and Barry Brill is male - you are getting
confused."
If you had meant that the article was not crap you should have been
clearer - posting a url and saying we must fix this crap clearly
indicated that you regarded the material at that url to be crap - all
I did was agree, and point out that the author is male. .
Abuse gone for now.
Ardern is, apparently, female - not that I care. Rich is obviously some sort
of
gender that is yet to be defined.
I was not referring to Brill you moron.
changed the record of previous posts by another poster to
substantially change the meaning, and also often deletes posts that he disagrees with.
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
She’s long gone from political power, yet a powerful woman still scares >>the shit out of you, doesn’t she?
No, she never has.
On Sat, 17 Feb 2024 06:02:17 GMT, Tony wrote:Mentioning someone is not obsession - those comprehension lessons for you appear to becoming more urgent. I simply loathe her dishonesty and deliberate destruction of a country.
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
She’s long gone from political power, yet a powerful woman still scares >>>the shit out of you, doesn’t she?
No, she never has.
And yet you are still obsessing over her. If she is so ineffectual, why
waste your time?
On Sun, 18 Feb 2024 10:08:51 +1300, Aristotle_the_3rd <aristotle@wisegreeks.com> wrote:
<deleted>
Welcome Aristotle.
You are correct that there are few new posters to nz.general - other
"social media" are more the focus for most New Zealanders these days. Anonymity can be useful at times, but sadly is so often used to
indulge in offensive behaviour. I have followed nz.general from around
the time it started, with a few breaks, I suspect it will take us by
surprise when it eventually stops.
Do post again.
Rich80105
On 18/02/2024 11:32 am, Rich80105 wrote:You just met the group troll. I suggest that you ignore him, butter turns rancid whenever he is with a foot of some.
On Sun, 18 Feb 2024 10:08:51 +1300, Aristotle_the_3rdKind of you to welcome me, funny really because I have been watching a
<aristotle@wisegreeks.com> wrote:
<deleted>
Welcome Aristotle.
You are correct that there are few new posters to nz.general - other
"social media" are more the focus for most New Zealanders these days.
Anonymity can be useful at times, but sadly is so often used to
indulge in offensive behaviour. I have followed nz.general from around
the time it started, with a few breaks, I suspect it will take us by
surprise when it eventually stops.
Do post again.
Rich80105
while.
I see you deleted most of what I wrote but you also don't like people >deleting your words. Why is it different for you? I have seen stuff from
you that is rude as well.
On 18/02/2024 11:32 am, Rich80105 wrote:
On Sun, 18 Feb 2024 10:08:51 +1300, Aristotle_the_3rdKind of you to welcome me, funny really because I have been watching a
<aristotle@wisegreeks.com> wrote:
<deleted>
Welcome Aristotle.
You are correct that there are few new posters to nz.general - other
"social media" are more the focus for most New Zealanders these days.
Anonymity can be useful at times, but sadly is so often used to
indulge in offensive behaviour. I have followed nz.general from around
the time it started, with a few breaks, I suspect it will take us by
surprise when it eventually stops.
Do post again.
Rich80105
while.
I see you deleted most of what I wrote but you also don't like people >deleting your words. Why is it different for you? I have seen stuff from
you that is rude as well.
On Sun, 18 Feb 2024 14:47:47 +1300, Aristotle_the_3rd <aristotle@wisegreeks.com> wrote:Not really - you did just what you have said that others did.
On 18/02/2024 11:32 am, Rich80105 wrote:
On Sun, 18 Feb 2024 10:08:51 +1300, Aristotle_the_3rdKind of you to welcome me, funny really because I have been watching a
<aristotle@wisegreeks.com> wrote:
<deleted>
Welcome Aristotle.
You are correct that there are few new posters to nz.general - other
"social media" are more the focus for most New Zealanders these days.
Anonymity can be useful at times, but sadly is so often used to
indulge in offensive behaviour. I have followed nz.general from around
the time it started, with a few breaks, I suspect it will take us by
surprise when it eventually stops.
Do post again.
Rich80105
while.
I see you deleted most of what I wrote but you also don't like people
deleting your words. Why is it different for you? I have seen stuff from
you that is rude as well.
I started a new Subject, but left the reference to the other thread so
that the reason for the welcome could be identified. As a new thread
it really is a new discussion however.
I delete words far less often than others, but I do object whenTo lots of posts, more often than most other posters. i say it as I see
deleting previous posts is used for avoidance of discussion. In the
days of dial-up modems it was done to keep band-width low, but those
days are long past. My concern in a recent thread was having my words changed to the reverse of what I had actually said - that is
effectively libel or defamation, which I believe we should all take seriously. In an anonymous group it is hardly worth trying to track
the cowardly defamer, but that does not excuse Tony for his dishonesty
and offensive post - yes I will respond rudely to some posts.
If you had only been watching we could not have welcomed you earlier,May be not, I think you will be bad news and i just wanted to be
but if you are now surprised, have you also posted under another name?
Feel free to start a post if there is a topic you believe could do
with discussion . . .
Aristotle_the_3rd <aristotle@wisegreeks.com> wrote:Sorry "unsuccessful", I don't use a spell checker and I type very fast - sometimes I miss a typo.
On 18/02/2024 4:45 pm, Rich80105 wrote:It is truly amazing how genuinely nasty people like Rich, can justify their >behaviour by putting the blame on those they defame and abuse.
On Sun, 18 Feb 2024 14:47:47 +1300, Aristotle_the_3rdNot really - you did just what you have said that others did.
<aristotle@wisegreeks.com> wrote:
On 18/02/2024 11:32 am, Rich80105 wrote:
On Sun, 18 Feb 2024 10:08:51 +1300, Aristotle_the_3rdKind of you to welcome me, funny really because I have been watching a >>>> while.
<aristotle@wisegreeks.com> wrote:
<deleted>
Welcome Aristotle.
You are correct that there are few new posters to nz.general - other >>>>> "social media" are more the focus for most New Zealanders these days. >>>>> Anonymity can be useful at times, but sadly is so often used to
indulge in offensive behaviour. I have followed nz.general from around >>>>> the time it started, with a few breaks, I suspect it will take us by >>>>> surprise when it eventually stops.
Do post again.
Rich80105
I see you deleted most of what I wrote but you also don't like people
deleting your words. Why is it different for you? I have seen stuff from >>>> you that is rude as well.
I started a new Subject, but left the reference to the other thread so
that the reason for the welcome could be identified. As a new thread
it really is a new discussion however.
To lots of posts, more often than most other posters. i say it as I see
I delete words far less often than others, but I do object when
deleting previous posts is used for avoidance of discussion. In the
days of dial-up modems it was done to keep band-width low, but those
days are long past. My concern in a recent thread was having my words
changed to the reverse of what I had actually said - that is
effectively libel or defamation, which I believe we should all take
seriously. In an anonymous group it is hardly worth trying to track
the cowardly defamer, but that does not excuse Tony for his dishonesty
and offensive post - yes I will respond rudely to some posts.
it and I think there are lots here that agree. The poster you mean only >>picks on you - why is that. got to be a reason.
May be not, I think you will be bad news and i just wanted to be
If you had only been watching we could not have welcomed you earlier,
but if you are now surprised, have you also posted under another name?
Feel free to start a post if there is a topic you believe could do
with discussion . . .
friendly, why are you never like that.
Rich is one such.
I am convinced he is a sociopath, he can not relate to other people although >he
will fake that in his personal life - true sociopathic behaviour is living a >lie.
He displays all the major symptoms.
He accuses me of defamation, the definition of which he clearly does not >understand, he on the other hand has defamed me and many others - some of >those
people his betters by any definition.
He thinks he owns this newsgroup but the reverse is the truth - it owns him. >He is not very bright but he is cunning, all sociopaths are.
The sad thing is he actually believes he is not the guilty one and he always >will unless he gets treatment which is often unsucessful.
On 18/02/2024 4:45 pm, Rich80105 wrote:It is truly amazing how genuinely nasty people like Rich, can justify their behaviour by putting the blame on those they defame and abuse.
On Sun, 18 Feb 2024 14:47:47 +1300, Aristotle_the_3rdNot really - you did just what you have said that others did.
<aristotle@wisegreeks.com> wrote:
On 18/02/2024 11:32 am, Rich80105 wrote:
On Sun, 18 Feb 2024 10:08:51 +1300, Aristotle_the_3rdKind of you to welcome me, funny really because I have been watching a
<aristotle@wisegreeks.com> wrote:
<deleted>
Welcome Aristotle.
You are correct that there are few new posters to nz.general - other
"social media" are more the focus for most New Zealanders these days.
Anonymity can be useful at times, but sadly is so often used to
indulge in offensive behaviour. I have followed nz.general from around >>>> the time it started, with a few breaks, I suspect it will take us by
surprise when it eventually stops.
Do post again.
Rich80105
while.
I see you deleted most of what I wrote but you also don't like people
deleting your words. Why is it different for you? I have seen stuff from >>> you that is rude as well.
I started a new Subject, but left the reference to the other thread so
that the reason for the welcome could be identified. As a new thread
it really is a new discussion however.
To lots of posts, more often than most other posters. i say it as I see
I delete words far less often than others, but I do object when
deleting previous posts is used for avoidance of discussion. In the
days of dial-up modems it was done to keep band-width low, but those
days are long past. My concern in a recent thread was having my words
changed to the reverse of what I had actually said - that is
effectively libel or defamation, which I believe we should all take
seriously. In an anonymous group it is hardly worth trying to track
the cowardly defamer, but that does not excuse Tony for his dishonesty
and offensive post - yes I will respond rudely to some posts.
it and I think there are lots here that agree. The poster you mean only >picks on you - why is that. got to be a reason.
May be not, I think you will be bad news and i just wanted to be
If you had only been watching we could not have welcomed you earlier,
but if you are now surprised, have you also posted under another name?
Feel free to start a post if there is a topic you believe could do
with discussion . . .
friendly, why are you never like that.
Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Hell me too. Sometimes people get annoyed with bad spelling by other
Aristotle_the_3rd <aristotle@wisegreeks.com> wrote:Sorry "unsuccessful", I don't use a spell checker and I type very fast - sometimes I miss a typo.
On 18/02/2024 4:45 pm, Rich80105 wrote:It is truly amazing how genuinely nasty people like Rich, can justify their >> behaviour by putting the blame on those they defame and abuse.
On Sun, 18 Feb 2024 14:47:47 +1300, Aristotle_the_3rdNot really - you did just what you have said that others did.
<aristotle@wisegreeks.com> wrote:
On 18/02/2024 11:32 am, Rich80105 wrote:
On Sun, 18 Feb 2024 10:08:51 +1300, Aristotle_the_3rdKind of you to welcome me, funny really because I have been watching a >>>>> while.
<aristotle@wisegreeks.com> wrote:
<deleted>
Welcome Aristotle.
You are correct that there are few new posters to nz.general - other >>>>>> "social media" are more the focus for most New Zealanders these days. >>>>>> Anonymity can be useful at times, but sadly is so often used to
indulge in offensive behaviour. I have followed nz.general from around >>>>>> the time it started, with a few breaks, I suspect it will take us by >>>>>> surprise when it eventually stops.
Do post again.
Rich80105
I see you deleted most of what I wrote but you also don't like people >>>>> deleting your words. Why is it different for you? I have seen stuff from >>>>> you that is rude as well.
I started a new Subject, but left the reference to the other thread so >>>> that the reason for the welcome could be identified. As a new thread
it really is a new discussion however.
To lots of posts, more often than most other posters. i say it as I see
I delete words far less often than others, but I do object when
deleting previous posts is used for avoidance of discussion. In the
days of dial-up modems it was done to keep band-width low, but those
days are long past. My concern in a recent thread was having my words >>>> changed to the reverse of what I had actually said - that is
effectively libel or defamation, which I believe we should all take
seriously. In an anonymous group it is hardly worth trying to track
the cowardly defamer, but that does not excuse Tony for his dishonesty >>>> and offensive post - yes I will respond rudely to some posts.
it and I think there are lots here that agree. The poster you mean only >>> picks on you - why is that. got to be a reason.
May be not, I think you will be bad news and i just wanted to be
If you had only been watching we could not have welcomed you earlier,
but if you are now surprised, have you also posted under another name? >>>> Feel free to start a post if there is a topic you believe could do
with discussion . . .
friendly, why are you never like that.
Rich is one such.
I am convinced he is a sociopath, he can not relate to other people although >> he
will fake that in his personal life - true sociopathic behaviour is living a >> lie.
He displays all the major symptoms.
He accuses me of defamation, the definition of which he clearly does not
understand, he on the other hand has defamed me and many others - some of
those
people his betters by any definition.
He thinks he owns this newsgroup but the reverse is the truth - it owns him. >> He is not very bright but he is cunning, all sociopaths are.
The sad thing is he actually believes he is not the guilty one and he always >> will unless he gets treatment which is often unsucessful.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 120:16:25 |
| Calls: | 6,662 |
| Files: | 12,210 |
| Messages: | 5,334,422 |