• What a disgrace

    From Tony@21:1/5 to All on Wed Feb 14 02:46:34 2024
    XPost: nz.politics

    https://www.hobsonspledge.nz/meetjanetdickson
    The REA should not take this power on themselves.
    Unless they also insist on Chinese, Tongan, Tokelauan, Samoan, English, German, and another 150 ++ cultures.
    I hope this woman wins and I hope the practice becomes illegal.
    It is racist.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to blah@blah.blah on Wed Feb 14 05:48:36 2024
    XPost: nz.politics

    BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:
    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 02:46:34 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>
    wrote:

    https://www.hobsonspledge.nz/meetjanetdickson
    The REA should not take this power on themselves.
    Unless they also insist on Chinese, Tongan, Tokelauan, Samoan, English, >>German,
    and another 150 ++ cultures.
    I hope this woman wins and I hope the practice becomes illegal.
    It is racist.

    If you want to find out what a complete waste of time, space and money
    this all is, here is the link.

    https://www.wananga.ac.nz/media/2gqlvpwe/te-kakano-update-v3.pdf

    The real estate authority is yet another one of a long list of
    government departments that need to be abolished immediately with all >involved sacked and put on the dole.

    Bill.

    Thanks Bill, that initiative is bullshit. The REA have no right to do this - it should be stopped.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BR@21:1/5 to All on Wed Feb 14 18:37:11 2024
    XPost: nz.politics

    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 02:46:34 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>
    wrote:

    https://www.hobsonspledge.nz/meetjanetdickson
    The REA should not take this power on themselves.
    Unless they also insist on Chinese, Tongan, Tokelauan, Samoan, English, German,
    and another 150 ++ cultures.
    I hope this woman wins and I hope the practice becomes illegal.
    It is racist.

    If you want to find out what a complete waste of time, space and money
    this all is, here is the link.

    https://www.wananga.ac.nz/media/2gqlvpwe/te-kakano-update-v3.pdf

    The real estate authority is yet another one of a long list of
    government departments that need to be abolished immediately with all
    involved sacked and put on the dole.

    Bill.

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
    https://www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to All on Wed Feb 14 22:59:13 2024
    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 05:48:36 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>
    wrote:

    BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:
    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 02:46:34 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>
    wrote:

    https://www.hobsonspledge.nz/meetjanetdickson
    The REA should not take this power on themselves.
    Unless they also insist on Chinese, Tongan, Tokelauan, Samoan, English, >>>German,
    and another 150 ++ cultures.
    I hope this woman wins and I hope the practice becomes illegal.
    It is racist.

    If you want to find out what a complete waste of time, space and money
    this all is, here is the link.

    https://www.wananga.ac.nz/media/2gqlvpwe/te-kakano-update-v3.pdf

    The real estate authority is yet another one of a long list of
    government departments that need to be abolished immediately with all >>involved sacked and put on the dole.

    Bill.

    Thanks Bill, that initiative is bullshit. The REA have no right to do this - it
    should be stopped.

    it is quite common for professional organisations to require some
    knowledge of cultural aspects of their job, and how to avoid problems
    and get the best results with all clients - as far as I am aware
    doctors and teachers and dentists have such cultural issues covered as
    part of initial and ongoing professional development course on such
    matters from time to time. This was dated April 2023 - is this the
    first complaint about it? I have not heard of any previous
    complaints. (And I suspect that in some areas Pacifica issues would
    also be covered - they are large enough to matter in some areas but
    not others; Chinese are known for using agents who speak their
    language . . .

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BR@21:1/5 to All on Thu Feb 15 05:47:26 2024
    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 22:59:13 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 05:48:36 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>
    wrote:

    BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:
    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 02:46:34 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>
    wrote:

    https://www.hobsonspledge.nz/meetjanetdickson
    The REA should not take this power on themselves.
    Unless they also insist on Chinese, Tongan, Tokelauan, Samoan, English, >>>>German,
    and another 150 ++ cultures.
    I hope this woman wins and I hope the practice becomes illegal.
    It is racist.

    If you want to find out what a complete waste of time, space and money >>>this all is, here is the link.

    https://www.wananga.ac.nz/media/2gqlvpwe/te-kakano-update-v3.pdf

    The real estate authority is yet another one of a long list of
    government departments that need to be abolished immediately with all >>>involved sacked and put on the dole.

    Bill.

    Thanks Bill, that initiative is bullshit. The REA have no right to do this - it
    should be stopped.

    it is quite common for professional organisations to require some
    knowledge of cultural aspects of their job, and how to avoid problems
    and get the best results with all clients - as far as I am aware
    doctors and teachers and dentists have such cultural issues covered as
    part of initial and ongoing professional development course on such
    matters from time to time. This was dated April 2023 - is this the
    first complaint about it? I have not heard of any previous
    complaints. (And I suspect that in some areas Pacifica issues would
    also be covered - they are large enough to matter in some areas but
    not others; Chinese are known for using agents who speak their
    language . . .

    You're full of it.

    Why the hell would it need to be compulsory?

    Bill.

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
    https://www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Wed Feb 14 19:08:09 2024
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 05:48:36 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>
    wrote:

    BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:
    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 02:46:34 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>
    wrote:

    https://www.hobsonspledge.nz/meetjanetdickson
    The REA should not take this power on themselves.
    Unless they also insist on Chinese, Tongan, Tokelauan, Samoan, English, >>>>German,
    and another 150 ++ cultures.
    I hope this woman wins and I hope the practice becomes illegal.
    It is racist.

    If you want to find out what a complete waste of time, space and money >>>this all is, here is the link.

    https://www.wananga.ac.nz/media/2gqlvpwe/te-kakano-update-v3.pdf

    The real estate authority is yet another one of a long list of
    government departments that need to be abolished immediately with all >>>involved sacked and put on the dole.

    Bill.

    Thanks Bill, that initiative is bullshit. The REA have no right to do this - >>it
    should be stopped.

    it is quite common for professional organisations to require some
    knowledge of cultural aspects of their job, and how to avoid problems
    and get the best results with all clients - as far as I am aware
    doctors and teachers and dentists have such cultural issues covered as
    part of initial and ongoing professional development course on such
    matters from time to time. This was dated April 2023 - is this the
    first complaint about it? I have not heard of any previous
    complaints. (And I suspect that in some areas Pacifica issues would
    also be covered - they are large enough to matter in some areas but
    not others; Chinese are known for using agents who speak their
    language . . .
    What nonsense - you failed miserably to defend a policy that is without any value but is anti free market.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to All on Thu Feb 15 09:34:48 2024
    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 19:08:09 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>
    wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 05:48:36 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>
    wrote:

    BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:
    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 02:46:34 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>
    wrote:

    https://www.hobsonspledge.nz/meetjanetdickson
    The REA should not take this power on themselves.
    Unless they also insist on Chinese, Tongan, Tokelauan, Samoan, English, >>>>>German,
    and another 150 ++ cultures.
    I hope this woman wins and I hope the practice becomes illegal.
    It is racist.

    If you want to find out what a complete waste of time, space and money >>>>this all is, here is the link.

    https://www.wananga.ac.nz/media/2gqlvpwe/te-kakano-update-v3.pdf

    The real estate authority is yet another one of a long list of >>>>government departments that need to be abolished immediately with all >>>>involved sacked and put on the dole.

    Bill.

    Thanks Bill, that initiative is bullshit. The REA have no right to do this - >>>it
    should be stopped.

    it is quite common for professional organisations to require some
    knowledge of cultural aspects of their job, and how to avoid problems
    and get the best results with all clients - as far as I am aware
    doctors and teachers and dentists have such cultural issues covered as
    part of initial and ongoing professional development course on such
    matters from time to time. This was dated April 2023 - is this the
    first complaint about it? I have not heard of any previous
    complaints. (And I suspect that in some areas Pacifica issues would
    also be covered - they are large enough to matter in some areas but
    not others; Chinese are known for using agents who speak their
    language . . .
    What nonsense - you failed miserably to defend a policy that is without any >value but is anti free market.
    Measuring that real estate agents are qualified to provide good
    service to all potential clients is not anti-free market! It is
    however trying to make sure poor experiences with an agent do not make
    'do it yourself' more popular with sellers. Many professions have
    continuing professional development requirements, which the profession
    decide for themselves. Do you want the government to override
    professional requirements that the profession set for themselves?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Thu Feb 15 00:13:45 2024
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 14 Feb 2024 23:36:21 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:

    On 2024-02-14, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 05:48:36 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>
    wrote:

    BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:
    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 02:46:34 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> >>>>>wrote:

    https://www.hobsonspledge.nz/meetjanetdickson
    The REA should not take this power on themselves.
    Unless they also insist on Chinese, Tongan, Tokelauan, Samoan, English, >>>>>>German,
    and another 150 ++ cultures.
    I hope this woman wins and I hope the practice becomes illegal.
    It is racist.

    If you want to find out what a complete waste of time, space and money >>>>>this all is, here is the link.

    https://www.wananga.ac.nz/media/2gqlvpwe/te-kakano-update-v3.pdf

    The real estate authority is yet another one of a long list of >>>>>government departments that need to be abolished immediately with all >>>>>involved sacked and put on the dole.

    Bill.

    Thanks Bill, that initiative is bullshit. The REA have no right to do this >>>>- it
    should be stopped.

    it is quite common for professional organisations to require some
    knowledge of cultural aspects of their job, and how to avoid problems
    and get the best results with all clients

    Surely in a muti cutural society the people should respect the other >>cultures and not offend them by ones actions.

    Some of the Maori values are very much common sense. Shitting is a river, >>keeping the places where food are prepared away from contamination. Wash one >>hands in the hand basin not the kitchen sink. Consider the mice in the >>supermarkets - not a desirable thing.

    The example of the head is tapu and thus should not be touched without the >>owners permission. In the western/white/pakeha culture touching heads willy >>nilly is frowned upon. Basically there is agreement.

    The issue is one of excess, the more is better arguement. The gravey boat is >>created and instead of acceptance the two tribes form. People do not respond >>well to having something jammed down their throats. Placing an idea an idea >>on the roadside is a far better plan.

    - as far as I am aware
    doctors and teachers and dentists have such cultural issues covered as
    part of initial and ongoing professional development course on such
    matters from time to time. This was dated April 2023 - is this the
    first complaint about it?

    Probably not. The other REA people probably have done the course, and >>carried on as before while the "teachers" have ticked the box and collect >>some money from doing so.


    I have not heard of any previous
    complaints. (And I suspect that in some areas Pacifica issues would
    also be covered - they are large enough to matter in some areas but
    not others; Chinese are known for using agents who speak their
    language . . .

    Chinese are bilingual, others are decents from the Otago gold rush. The >>stereo type that the Chinese do not speak English is incorect. The recent >>ones maybe not so much but they go from very little English to Kiwi >>English.

    I agree; I have friends whose great grandparents emigrated to New
    Zealand. In the Real Estate world however a few years ago there was a
    rush of Chinese university students buying buildings; presumably with >assistance from parents, and other Chinese seeking bolt holes from
    Hong Kong and Taiwan as well as mainland China. That is less of an
    issue now, but for estate agents in Auckland it was an important
    segment of the market, and may still be. I know of a school in
    Auckland where around 5% of new students had English as their language
    in the home - largely languages from India as well as Chinese.

    I am happy to leave such issues to local areas and the profession -
    unlike the current government who want all decisions to be agreed with >Ministers.
    What a pethetic lie that is, don't you have anything worthwhile? If not don't bother.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Thu Feb 15 00:15:10 2024
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 19:08:09 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>
    wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 05:48:36 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>
    wrote:

    BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:
    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 02:46:34 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> >>>>>wrote:

    https://www.hobsonspledge.nz/meetjanetdickson
    The REA should not take this power on themselves.
    Unless they also insist on Chinese, Tongan, Tokelauan, Samoan, English, >>>>>>German,
    and another 150 ++ cultures.
    I hope this woman wins and I hope the practice becomes illegal.
    It is racist.

    If you want to find out what a complete waste of time, space and money >>>>>this all is, here is the link.

    https://www.wananga.ac.nz/media/2gqlvpwe/te-kakano-update-v3.pdf

    The real estate authority is yet another one of a long list of >>>>>government departments that need to be abolished immediately with all >>>>>involved sacked and put on the dole.

    Bill.

    Thanks Bill, that initiative is bullshit. The REA have no right to do this >>>>-
    it
    should be stopped.

    it is quite common for professional organisations to require some >>>knowledge of cultural aspects of their job, and how to avoid problems
    and get the best results with all clients - as far as I am aware
    doctors and teachers and dentists have such cultural issues covered as >>>part of initial and ongoing professional development course on such >>>matters from time to time. This was dated April 2023 - is this the
    first complaint about it? I have not heard of any previous
    complaints. (And I suspect that in some areas Pacifica issues would
    also be covered - they are large enough to matter in some areas but
    not others; Chinese are known for using agents who speak their
    language . . .
    What nonsense - you failed miserably to defend a policy that is without any >>value but is anti free market.
    Measuring that real estate agents are qualified to provide good
    service to all potential clients is not anti-free market!
    No it is not, well done - but that is not what this is about.
    It is
    however trying to make sure poor experiences with an agent do not make
    'do it yourself' more popular with sellers. Many professions have
    continuing professional development requirements, which the profession
    decide for themselves. Do you want the government to override
    professional requirements that the profession set for themselves?
    Don't ask off topic stupid questions.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gordon@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Wed Feb 14 23:36:21 2024
    On 2024-02-14, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 05:48:36 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>
    wrote:

    BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:
    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 02:46:34 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>
    wrote:

    https://www.hobsonspledge.nz/meetjanetdickson
    The REA should not take this power on themselves.
    Unless they also insist on Chinese, Tongan, Tokelauan, Samoan, English, >>>>German,
    and another 150 ++ cultures.
    I hope this woman wins and I hope the practice becomes illegal.
    It is racist.

    If you want to find out what a complete waste of time, space and money >>>this all is, here is the link.

    https://www.wananga.ac.nz/media/2gqlvpwe/te-kakano-update-v3.pdf

    The real estate authority is yet another one of a long list of
    government departments that need to be abolished immediately with all >>>involved sacked and put on the dole.

    Bill.

    Thanks Bill, that initiative is bullshit. The REA have no right to do this - it
    should be stopped.

    it is quite common for professional organisations to require some
    knowledge of cultural aspects of their job, and how to avoid problems
    and get the best results with all clients

    Surely in a muti cutural society the people should respect the other
    cultures and not offend them by ones actions.

    Some of the Maori values are very much common sense. Shitting is a river, keeping the places where food are prepared away from contamination. Wash one hands in the hand basin not the kitchen sink. Consider the mice in the supermarkets - not a desirable thing.

    The example of the head is tapu and thus should not be touched without the owners permission. In the western/white/pakeha culture touching heads willy nilly is frowned upon. Basically there is agreement.

    The issue is one of excess, the more is better arguement. The gravey boat is created and instead of acceptance the two tribes form. People do not respond well to having something jammed down their throats. Placing an idea an idea
    on the roadside is a far better plan.

    - as far as I am aware
    doctors and teachers and dentists have such cultural issues covered as
    part of initial and ongoing professional development course on such
    matters from time to time. This was dated April 2023 - is this the
    first complaint about it?

    Probably not. The other REA people probably have done the course, and
    carried on as before while the "teachers" have ticked the box and collect
    some money from doing so.


    I have not heard of any previous
    complaints. (And I suspect that in some areas Pacifica issues would
    also be covered - they are large enough to matter in some areas but
    not others; Chinese are known for using agents who speak their
    language . . .

    Chinese are bilingual, others are decents from the Otago gold rush. The
    stereo type that the Chinese do not speak English is incorect. The recent
    ones maybe not so much but they go from very little English to Kiwi
    English.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to Gordon on Thu Feb 15 13:05:28 2024
    On 14 Feb 2024 23:36:21 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:

    On 2024-02-14, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 05:48:36 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>
    wrote:

    BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:
    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 02:46:34 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>
    wrote:

    https://www.hobsonspledge.nz/meetjanetdickson
    The REA should not take this power on themselves.
    Unless they also insist on Chinese, Tongan, Tokelauan, Samoan, English, >>>>>German,
    and another 150 ++ cultures.
    I hope this woman wins and I hope the practice becomes illegal.
    It is racist.

    If you want to find out what a complete waste of time, space and money >>>>this all is, here is the link.

    https://www.wananga.ac.nz/media/2gqlvpwe/te-kakano-update-v3.pdf

    The real estate authority is yet another one of a long list of >>>>government departments that need to be abolished immediately with all >>>>involved sacked and put on the dole.

    Bill.

    Thanks Bill, that initiative is bullshit. The REA have no right to do this - it
    should be stopped.

    it is quite common for professional organisations to require some
    knowledge of cultural aspects of their job, and how to avoid problems
    and get the best results with all clients

    Surely in a muti cutural society the people should respect the other
    cultures and not offend them by ones actions.

    Some of the Maori values are very much common sense. Shitting is a river, >keeping the places where food are prepared away from contamination. Wash one >hands in the hand basin not the kitchen sink. Consider the mice in the >supermarkets - not a desirable thing.

    The example of the head is tapu and thus should not be touched without the >owners permission. In the western/white/pakeha culture touching heads willy >nilly is frowned upon. Basically there is agreement.

    The issue is one of excess, the more is better arguement. The gravey boat is >created and instead of acceptance the two tribes form. People do not respond >well to having something jammed down their throats. Placing an idea an idea >on the roadside is a far better plan.

    - as far as I am aware
    doctors and teachers and dentists have such cultural issues covered as
    part of initial and ongoing professional development course on such
    matters from time to time. This was dated April 2023 - is this the
    first complaint about it?

    Probably not. The other REA people probably have done the course, and
    carried on as before while the "teachers" have ticked the box and collect >some money from doing so.


    I have not heard of any previous
    complaints. (And I suspect that in some areas Pacifica issues would
    also be covered - they are large enough to matter in some areas but
    not others; Chinese are known for using agents who speak their
    language . . .

    Chinese are bilingual, others are decents from the Otago gold rush. The >stereo type that the Chinese do not speak English is incorect. The recent >ones maybe not so much but they go from very little English to Kiwi
    English.

    I agree; I have friends whose great grandparents emigrated to New
    Zealand. In the Real Estate world however a few years ago there was a
    rush of Chinese university students buying buildings; presumably with assistance from parents, and other Chinese seeking bolt holes from
    Hong Kong and Taiwan as well as mainland China. That is less of an
    issue now, but for estate agents in Auckland it was an important
    segment of the market, and may still be. I know of a school in
    Auckland where around 5% of new students had English as their language
    in the home - largely languages from India as well as Chinese.

    I am happy to leave such issues to local areas and the profession -
    unlike the current government who want all decisions to be agreed with Ministers.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to All on Thu Feb 15 16:46:37 2024
    On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 00:15:10 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>
    wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 19:08:09 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>
    wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 05:48:36 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>
    wrote:

    BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:
    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 02:46:34 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> >>>>>>wrote:

    https://www.hobsonspledge.nz/meetjanetdickson
    The REA should not take this power on themselves.
    Unless they also insist on Chinese, Tongan, Tokelauan, Samoan, English, >>>>>>>German,
    and another 150 ++ cultures.
    I hope this woman wins and I hope the practice becomes illegal. >>>>>>>It is racist.

    If you want to find out what a complete waste of time, space and money >>>>>>this all is, here is the link.

    https://www.wananga.ac.nz/media/2gqlvpwe/te-kakano-update-v3.pdf

    The real estate authority is yet another one of a long list of >>>>>>government departments that need to be abolished immediately with all >>>>>>involved sacked and put on the dole.

    Bill.

    Thanks Bill, that initiative is bullshit. The REA have no right to do this >>>>>-
    it
    should be stopped.

    it is quite common for professional organisations to require some >>>>knowledge of cultural aspects of their job, and how to avoid problems >>>>and get the best results with all clients - as far as I am aware >>>>doctors and teachers and dentists have such cultural issues covered as >>>>part of initial and ongoing professional development course on such >>>>matters from time to time. This was dated April 2023 - is this the >>>>first complaint about it? I have not heard of any previous
    complaints. (And I suspect that in some areas Pacifica issues would >>>>also be covered - they are large enough to matter in some areas but >>>>not others; Chinese are known for using agents who speak their
    language . . .
    What nonsense - you failed miserably to defend a policy that is without any >>>value but is anti free market.
    Measuring that real estate agents are qualified to provide good
    service to all potential clients is not anti-free market!
    No it is not, well done - but that is not what this is about.
    It is
    however trying to make sure poor experiences with an agent do not make
    'do it yourself' more popular with sellers. Many professions have >>continuing professional development requirements, which the profession >>decide for themselves. Do you want the government to override
    professional requirements that the profession set for themselves?
    Don't ask off topic stupid questions.

    The true disgrace is the poster that said:
    "I hope this woman wins and I hope the practice becomes illegal.
    It is racist."

    Of course to make it illegal for professional associations to set
    rules for their members without government approval is exactly what
    that disgraceful poster was urging. Thanks for picking up on that,
    Tony.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Thu Feb 15 05:41:12 2024
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 00:15:10 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>
    wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 19:08:09 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>
    wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 05:48:36 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> >>>>>wrote:

    BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:
    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 02:46:34 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> >>>>>>>wrote:

    https://www.hobsonspledge.nz/meetjanetdickson
    The REA should not take this power on themselves.
    Unless they also insist on Chinese, Tongan, Tokelauan, Samoan, English, >>>>>>>>German,
    and another 150 ++ cultures.
    I hope this woman wins and I hope the practice becomes illegal. >>>>>>>>It is racist.

    If you want to find out what a complete waste of time, space and money >>>>>>>this all is, here is the link.

    https://www.wananga.ac.nz/media/2gqlvpwe/te-kakano-update-v3.pdf

    The real estate authority is yet another one of a long list of >>>>>>>government departments that need to be abolished immediately with all >>>>>>>involved sacked and put on the dole.

    Bill.

    Thanks Bill, that initiative is bullshit. The REA have no right to do >>>>>>this
    -
    it
    should be stopped.

    it is quite common for professional organisations to require some >>>>>knowledge of cultural aspects of their job, and how to avoid problems >>>>>and get the best results with all clients - as far as I am aware >>>>>doctors and teachers and dentists have such cultural issues covered as >>>>>part of initial and ongoing professional development course on such >>>>>matters from time to time. This was dated April 2023 - is this the >>>>>first complaint about it? I have not heard of any previous >>>>>complaints. (And I suspect that in some areas Pacifica issues would >>>>>also be covered - they are large enough to matter in some areas but >>>>>not others; Chinese are known for using agents who speak their >>>>>language . . .
    What nonsense - you failed miserably to defend a policy that is without any >>>>value but is anti free market.
    Measuring that real estate agents are qualified to provide good
    service to all potential clients is not anti-free market!
    No it is not, well done - but that is not what this is about.
    It is
    however trying to make sure poor experiences with an agent do not make >>>'do it yourself' more popular with sellers. Many professions have >>>continuing professional development requirements, which the profession >>>decide for themselves. Do you want the government to override >>>professional requirements that the profession set for themselves?
    Don't ask off topic stupid questions.

    The true disgrace is the poster that said:
    "I hope this woman wins and I hope the practice becomes illegal.
    It is racist."

    Indeed what an excellent thing to post Tony. Congratulations. Rich on the other hand is quite happy for the REA and similatr institutions to interfere with the free market and to set impositions that damage somebody's opportunity to earn a living honestly and legally.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Crash@21:1/5 to All on Fri Feb 16 11:50:33 2024
    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 22:59:13 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 05:48:36 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>
    wrote:

    BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:
    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 02:46:34 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>
    wrote:

    https://www.hobsonspledge.nz/meetjanetdickson
    The REA should not take this power on themselves.
    Unless they also insist on Chinese, Tongan, Tokelauan, Samoan, English, >>>>German,
    and another 150 ++ cultures.
    I hope this woman wins and I hope the practice becomes illegal.
    It is racist.

    If you want to find out what a complete waste of time, space and money >>>this all is, here is the link.

    https://www.wananga.ac.nz/media/2gqlvpwe/te-kakano-update-v3.pdf

    The real estate authority is yet another one of a long list of
    government departments that need to be abolished immediately with all >>>involved sacked and put on the dole.

    Bill.

    Thanks Bill, that initiative is bullshit. The REA have no right to do this - it
    should be stopped.

    it is quite common for professional organisations to require some
    knowledge of cultural aspects of their job, and how to avoid problems
    and get the best results with all clients - as far as I am aware
    doctors and teachers and dentists have such cultural issues covered as
    part of initial and ongoing professional development course on such
    matters from time to time. This was dated April 2023 - is this the
    first complaint about it? I have not heard of any previous
    complaints. (And I suspect that in some areas Pacifica issues would
    also be covered - they are large enough to matter in some areas but
    not others; Chinese are known for using agents who speak their
    language . . .

    While I agree that there has been a bit of a delay with this, the
    position that Hobson's Pledge are taking is that of over-reach of a professional body with statutory powers. This is the summary of the
    planned appeal:

    ***
    -RELIEF SOUGHT:
    It is expected that the Court will be asked to determine whether:

    1. The REAs CPD rules are invalid insofar as they purport to extend
    the REAs powers under the Act;

    2. In requiring licensees to undertake Te Kakano as a compulsory
    condition of their licences, the REA has acted unlawfully,
    irrationally, unreasonably and/or inconsistently with the rights to
    freedom of expression and conscience guaranteed under the New Zealand
    Bill of Rights Act 1990.

    3. The REAs commissioning of a single supplier to provide compulsory
    CPD training to all licensees is in breach of Part 2 of the Commerce
    Act 1986.

    4. The Registrars refusal to exempt Janet Dickson from undertaking
    the Te Kakano course should be set aside.

    ***

    So this is an issue of the REA extending its mandate by imposing
    requirements on its members that are not professionally required.


    --
    Crash McBash

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Crash on Thu Feb 15 23:17:39 2024
    Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> wrote:
    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 22:59:13 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 05:48:36 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>
    wrote:

    BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:
    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 02:46:34 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>
    wrote:

    https://www.hobsonspledge.nz/meetjanetdickson
    The REA should not take this power on themselves.
    Unless they also insist on Chinese, Tongan, Tokelauan, Samoan, English, >>>>>German,
    and another 150 ++ cultures.
    I hope this woman wins and I hope the practice becomes illegal.
    It is racist.

    If you want to find out what a complete waste of time, space and money >>>>this all is, here is the link.

    https://www.wananga.ac.nz/media/2gqlvpwe/te-kakano-update-v3.pdf

    The real estate authority is yet another one of a long list of >>>>government departments that need to be abolished immediately with all >>>>involved sacked and put on the dole.

    Bill.

    Thanks Bill, that initiative is bullshit. The REA have no right to do this - >>>it
    should be stopped.

    it is quite common for professional organisations to require some
    knowledge of cultural aspects of their job, and how to avoid problems
    and get the best results with all clients - as far as I am aware
    doctors and teachers and dentists have such cultural issues covered as
    part of initial and ongoing professional development course on such
    matters from time to time. This was dated April 2023 - is this the
    first complaint about it? I have not heard of any previous
    complaints. (And I suspect that in some areas Pacifica issues would
    also be covered - they are large enough to matter in some areas but
    not others; Chinese are known for using agents who speak their
    language . . .

    While I agree that there has been a bit of a delay with this, the
    position that Hobson's Pledge are taking is that of over-reach of a >professional body with statutory powers. This is the summary of the
    planned appeal:

    ***
    -RELIEF SOUGHT:
    It is expected that the Court will be asked to determine whether:

    1. The REAs CPD rules are invalid insofar as they purport to extend
    the REAs powers under the Act;

    2. In requiring licensees to undertake Te Kakano as a compulsory
    condition of their licences, the REA has acted unlawfully,
    irrationally, unreasonably and/or inconsistently with the rights to
    freedom of expression and conscience guaranteed under the New Zealand
    Bill of Rights Act 1990.

    3. The REAs commissioning of a single supplier to provide compulsory
    CPD training to all licensees is in breach of Part 2 of the Commerce
    Act 1986.

    4. The Registrars refusal to exempt Janet Dickson from undertaking
    the Te Kakano course should be set aside.

    ***

    So this is an issue of the REA extending its mandate by imposing
    requirements on its members that are not professionally required.

    Exactly Crash.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to All on Fri Feb 16 13:02:15 2024
    On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 11:50:33 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>
    wrote:

    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 22:59:13 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 05:48:36 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>
    wrote:

    BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:
    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 02:46:34 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>
    wrote:

    https://www.hobsonspledge.nz/meetjanetdickson
    The REA should not take this power on themselves.
    Unless they also insist on Chinese, Tongan, Tokelauan, Samoan, English, >>>>>German,
    and another 150 ++ cultures.
    I hope this woman wins and I hope the practice becomes illegal.
    It is racist.

    If you want to find out what a complete waste of time, space and money >>>>this all is, here is the link.

    https://www.wananga.ac.nz/media/2gqlvpwe/te-kakano-update-v3.pdf

    The real estate authority is yet another one of a long list of >>>>government departments that need to be abolished immediately with all >>>>involved sacked and put on the dole.

    Bill.

    Thanks Bill, that initiative is bullshit. The REA have no right to do this - it
    should be stopped.

    it is quite common for professional organisations to require some
    knowledge of cultural aspects of their job, and how to avoid problems
    and get the best results with all clients - as far as I am aware
    doctors and teachers and dentists have such cultural issues covered as
    part of initial and ongoing professional development course on such
    matters from time to time. This was dated April 2023 - is this the
    first complaint about it? I have not heard of any previous
    complaints. (And I suspect that in some areas Pacifica issues would
    also be covered - they are large enough to matter in some areas but
    not others; Chinese are known for using agents who speak their
    language . . .

    While I agree that there has been a bit of a delay with this, the
    position that Hobson's Pledge are taking is that of over-reach of a >professional body with statutory powers. This is the summary of the
    planned appeal:

    ***
    -RELIEF SOUGHT:
    It is expected that the Court will be asked to determine whether:

    1. The REAs CPD rules are invalid insofar as they purport to extend
    the REAs powers under the Act;

    2. In requiring licensees to undertake Te Kakano as a compulsory
    condition of their licences, the REA has acted unlawfully,
    irrationally, unreasonably and/or inconsistently with the rights to
    freedom of expression and conscience guaranteed under the New Zealand
    Bill of Rights Act 1990.

    3. The REAs commissioning of a single supplier to provide compulsory
    CPD training to all licensees is in breach of Part 2 of the Commerce
    Act 1986.

    4. The Registrars refusal to exempt Janet Dickson from undertaking
    the Te Kakano course should be set aside.

    ***

    So this is an issue of the REA extending its mandate by imposing
    requirements on its members that are not professionally required.

    That certainly appears to be the attitude of Janet Dickson; it will be
    up to the Court to determine whether that the claims are valid if so
    what actions should be taken in relation to relief sought. Being a
    member of a profession does usually require that at least while acting
    in their capacity as a member of the profession, they act in a
    professional manner and respect rather than offend those relying on
    the integrity of members of the association.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Fri Feb 16 00:45:17 2024
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 11:50:33 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>
    wrote:

    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 22:59:13 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>wrote:

    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 05:48:36 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>
    wrote:

    BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:
    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 02:46:34 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> >>>>>wrote:

    https://www.hobsonspledge.nz/meetjanetdickson
    The REA should not take this power on themselves.
    Unless they also insist on Chinese, Tongan, Tokelauan, Samoan, English, >>>>>>German,
    and another 150 ++ cultures.
    I hope this woman wins and I hope the practice becomes illegal.
    It is racist.

    If you want to find out what a complete waste of time, space and money >>>>>this all is, here is the link.

    https://www.wananga.ac.nz/media/2gqlvpwe/te-kakano-update-v3.pdf

    The real estate authority is yet another one of a long list of >>>>>government departments that need to be abolished immediately with all >>>>>involved sacked and put on the dole.

    Bill.

    Thanks Bill, that initiative is bullshit. The REA have no right to do this >>>>- it
    should be stopped.

    it is quite common for professional organisations to require some >>>knowledge of cultural aspects of their job, and how to avoid problems
    and get the best results with all clients - as far as I am aware
    doctors and teachers and dentists have such cultural issues covered as >>>part of initial and ongoing professional development course on such >>>matters from time to time. This was dated April 2023 - is this the
    first complaint about it? I have not heard of any previous
    complaints. (And I suspect that in some areas Pacifica issues would
    also be covered - they are large enough to matter in some areas but
    not others; Chinese are known for using agents who speak their
    language . . .

    While I agree that there has been a bit of a delay with this, the
    position that Hobson's Pledge are taking is that of over-reach of a >>professional body with statutory powers. This is the summary of the >>planned appeal:

    ***
    -RELIEF SOUGHT:
    It is expected that the Court will be asked to determine whether:

    1. The REAs CPD rules are invalid insofar as they purport to extend
    the REAs powers under the Act;

    2. In requiring licensees to undertake Te Kakano as a compulsory
    condition of their licences, the REA has acted unlawfully,
    irrationally, unreasonably and/or inconsistently with the rights to
    freedom of expression and conscience guaranteed under the New Zealand
    Bill of Rights Act 1990.

    3. The REAs commissioning of a single supplier to provide compulsory
    CPD training to all licensees is in breach of Part 2 of the Commerce
    Act 1986.

    4. The Registrars refusal to exempt Janet Dickson from undertaking
    the Te Kakano course should be set aside.

    ***

    So this is an issue of the REA extending its mandate by imposing >>requirements on its members that are not professionally required.

    That certainly appears to be the attitude of Janet Dickson; it will be
    up to the Court to determine whether that the claims are valid if so
    what actions should be taken in relation to relief sought. Being a
    member of a profession does usually require that at least while acting
    in their capacity as a member of the profession, they act in a
    professional manner and respect rather than offend those relying on
    the integrity of members of the association.
    That is irrelevant - it is about how far such a body can control their members. It cannot be entirely open and this is a step much too far.
    There is nothing unprofessional about not knowing the fulll culture of any of the dozens of different cultures in this country.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BR@21:1/5 to All on Fri Feb 16 17:57:10 2024
    On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 13:02:15 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 11:50:33 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>
    wrote:

    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 22:59:13 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>wrote:

    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 05:48:36 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>
    wrote:

    BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:
    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 02:46:34 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> >>>>>wrote:

    https://www.hobsonspledge.nz/meetjanetdickson
    The REA should not take this power on themselves.
    Unless they also insist on Chinese, Tongan, Tokelauan, Samoan, English, >>>>>>German,
    and another 150 ++ cultures.
    I hope this woman wins and I hope the practice becomes illegal.
    It is racist.

    If you want to find out what a complete waste of time, space and money >>>>>this all is, here is the link.

    https://www.wananga.ac.nz/media/2gqlvpwe/te-kakano-update-v3.pdf

    The real estate authority is yet another one of a long list of >>>>>government departments that need to be abolished immediately with all >>>>>involved sacked and put on the dole.

    Bill.

    Thanks Bill, that initiative is bullshit. The REA have no right to do this - it
    should be stopped.

    it is quite common for professional organisations to require some >>>knowledge of cultural aspects of their job, and how to avoid problems
    and get the best results with all clients - as far as I am aware
    doctors and teachers and dentists have such cultural issues covered as >>>part of initial and ongoing professional development course on such >>>matters from time to time. This was dated April 2023 - is this the
    first complaint about it? I have not heard of any previous
    complaints. (And I suspect that in some areas Pacifica issues would
    also be covered - they are large enough to matter in some areas but
    not others; Chinese are known for using agents who speak their
    language . . .

    While I agree that there has been a bit of a delay with this, the
    position that Hobson's Pledge are taking is that of over-reach of a >>professional body with statutory powers. This is the summary of the >>planned appeal:

    ***
    -RELIEF SOUGHT:
    It is expected that the Court will be asked to determine whether:

    1. The REAs CPD rules are invalid insofar as they purport to extend
    the REAs powers under the Act;

    2. In requiring licensees to undertake Te Kakano as a compulsory
    condition of their licences, the REA has acted unlawfully,
    irrationally, unreasonably and/or inconsistently with the rights to
    freedom of expression and conscience guaranteed under the New Zealand
    Bill of Rights Act 1990.

    3. The REAs commissioning of a single supplier to provide compulsory
    CPD training to all licensees is in breach of Part 2 of the Commerce
    Act 1986.

    4. The Registrars refusal to exempt Janet Dickson from undertaking
    the Te Kakano course should be set aside.

    ***

    So this is an issue of the REA extending its mandate by imposing >>requirements on its members that are not professionally required.

    That certainly appears to be the attitude of Janet Dickson; it will be
    up to the Court to determine whether that the claims are valid if so
    what actions should be taken in relation to relief sought. Being a
    member of a profession does usually require that at least while acting
    in their capacity as a member of the profession, they act in a
    professional manner and respect rather than offend those relying on
    the integrity of members of the association.

    None of this nonsense was a requirement in the past. Why is it
    suddenly necessary now?

    Bill.

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
    https://www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Crash@21:1/5 to All on Fri Feb 16 20:22:58 2024
    On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 00:45:17 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>
    wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 11:50:33 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> >>wrote:

    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 22:59:13 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>wrote:

    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 05:48:36 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>
    wrote:

    BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:
    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 02:46:34 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> >>>>>>wrote:

    https://www.hobsonspledge.nz/meetjanetdickson
    The REA should not take this power on themselves.
    Unless they also insist on Chinese, Tongan, Tokelauan, Samoan, English, >>>>>>>German,
    and another 150 ++ cultures.
    I hope this woman wins and I hope the practice becomes illegal. >>>>>>>It is racist.

    If you want to find out what a complete waste of time, space and money >>>>>>this all is, here is the link.

    https://www.wananga.ac.nz/media/2gqlvpwe/te-kakano-update-v3.pdf

    The real estate authority is yet another one of a long list of >>>>>>government departments that need to be abolished immediately with all >>>>>>involved sacked and put on the dole.

    Bill.

    Thanks Bill, that initiative is bullshit. The REA have no right to do this >>>>>- it
    should be stopped.

    it is quite common for professional organisations to require some >>>>knowledge of cultural aspects of their job, and how to avoid problems >>>>and get the best results with all clients - as far as I am aware >>>>doctors and teachers and dentists have such cultural issues covered as >>>>part of initial and ongoing professional development course on such >>>>matters from time to time. This was dated April 2023 - is this the >>>>first complaint about it? I have not heard of any previous
    complaints. (And I suspect that in some areas Pacifica issues would >>>>also be covered - they are large enough to matter in some areas but >>>>not others; Chinese are known for using agents who speak their
    language . . .

    While I agree that there has been a bit of a delay with this, the >>>position that Hobson's Pledge are taking is that of over-reach of a >>>professional body with statutory powers. This is the summary of the >>>planned appeal:

    ***
    -RELIEF SOUGHT:
    It is expected that the Court will be asked to determine whether:

    1. The REAs CPD rules are invalid insofar as they purport to extend
    the REAs powers under the Act;

    2. In requiring licensees to undertake Te Kakano as a compulsory >>>condition of their licences, the REA has acted unlawfully,
    irrationally, unreasonably and/or inconsistently with the rights to >>>freedom of expression and conscience guaranteed under the New Zealand >>>Bill of Rights Act 1990.

    3. The REAs commissioning of a single supplier to provide compulsory
    CPD training to all licensees is in breach of Part 2 of the Commerce
    Act 1986.

    4. The Registrars refusal to exempt Janet Dickson from undertaking
    the Te Kakano course should be set aside.

    ***

    So this is an issue of the REA extending its mandate by imposing >>>requirements on its members that are not professionally required.

    That certainly appears to be the attitude of Janet Dickson; it will be
    up to the Court to determine whether that the claims are valid if so
    what actions should be taken in relation to relief sought. Being a
    member of a profession does usually require that at least while acting
    in their capacity as a member of the profession, they act in a
    professional manner and respect rather than offend those relying on
    the integrity of members of the association.
    That is irrelevant - it is about how far such a body can control their members.
    It cannot be entirely open and this is a step much too far.
    There is nothing unprofessional about not knowing the fulll culture of any of >the dozens of different cultures in this country.

    Tony you are expressing rational views here. When it comes to
    expressing rational views that disadvantage the imposition of Maori
    cultural training then those who have a different view will cast you
    as an anti-Maori racist. This is what Dickson is being portrayed as.
    The legal action planned is to establish legal limits on professional
    body cultural impositions.


    --
    Crash McBash

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to All on Fri Feb 16 23:16:25 2024
    On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 00:45:17 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>
    wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 11:50:33 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> >>wrote:

    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 22:59:13 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>wrote:

    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 05:48:36 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>
    wrote:

    BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:
    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 02:46:34 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> >>>>>>wrote:

    https://www.hobsonspledge.nz/meetjanetdickson
    The REA should not take this power on themselves.
    Unless they also insist on Chinese, Tongan, Tokelauan, Samoan, English, >>>>>>>German,
    and another 150 ++ cultures.
    I hope this woman wins and I hope the practice becomes illegal. >>>>>>>It is racist.

    If you want to find out what a complete waste of time, space and money >>>>>>this all is, here is the link.

    https://www.wananga.ac.nz/media/2gqlvpwe/te-kakano-update-v3.pdf

    The real estate authority is yet another one of a long list of >>>>>>government departments that need to be abolished immediately with all >>>>>>involved sacked and put on the dole.

    Bill.

    Thanks Bill, that initiative is bullshit. The REA have no right to do this >>>>>- it
    should be stopped.

    it is quite common for professional organisations to require some >>>>knowledge of cultural aspects of their job, and how to avoid problems >>>>and get the best results with all clients - as far as I am aware >>>>doctors and teachers and dentists have such cultural issues covered as >>>>part of initial and ongoing professional development course on such >>>>matters from time to time. This was dated April 2023 - is this the >>>>first complaint about it? I have not heard of any previous
    complaints. (And I suspect that in some areas Pacifica issues would >>>>also be covered - they are large enough to matter in some areas but >>>>not others; Chinese are known for using agents who speak their
    language . . .

    While I agree that there has been a bit of a delay with this, the >>>position that Hobson's Pledge are taking is that of over-reach of a >>>professional body with statutory powers. This is the summary of the >>>planned appeal:

    ***
    -RELIEF SOUGHT:
    It is expected that the Court will be asked to determine whether:

    1. The REAs CPD rules are invalid insofar as they purport to extend
    the REAs powers under the Act;

    2. In requiring licensees to undertake Te Kakano as a compulsory >>>condition of their licences, the REA has acted unlawfully,
    irrationally, unreasonably and/or inconsistently with the rights to >>>freedom of expression and conscience guaranteed under the New Zealand >>>Bill of Rights Act 1990.

    3. The REAs commissioning of a single supplier to provide compulsory
    CPD training to all licensees is in breach of Part 2 of the Commerce
    Act 1986.

    4. The Registrars refusal to exempt Janet Dickson from undertaking
    the Te Kakano course should be set aside.

    ***

    So this is an issue of the REA extending its mandate by imposing >>>requirements on its members that are not professionally required.

    That certainly appears to be the attitude of Janet Dickson; it will be
    up to the Court to determine whether that the claims are valid if so
    what actions should be taken in relation to relief sought. Being a
    member of a profession does usually require that at least while acting
    in their capacity as a member of the profession, they act in a
    professional manner and respect rather than offend those relying on
    the integrity of members of the association.
    That is irrelevant - it is about how far such a body can control their members.
    It cannot be entirely open and this is a step much too far.
    There is nothing unprofessional about not knowing the fulll culture of any of >the dozens of different cultures in this country.

    . . ."knowing the fulll culture of any of the dozens of different
    cultures in this country"

    It is only one and a half hours! Sheesh, what culture could you get
    more than scratching the surface of in 90 minutes! They can only
    cover critical essentials in that time - although perhaps Tony thinks
    his culture could be taught in 10 minutes . . . .

    There is something unprofessional in having no idea of any cultural
    issues for potential clients in the area in which you work, Tony.

    But I suspect this is ideological from Tony - who it appears gets some
    ideas third hand from Atlas . . .

    Let us wait and see hat the court says, and then wait again (whatever
    he decision) to see if NAct1st can agree on any legislative changes to
    prevent basic information being conveyed to so-called professionals. .
    .

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to blah@blah.blah on Fri Feb 16 23:18:10 2024
    On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 17:57:10 +1300, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 13:02:15 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 11:50:33 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> >>wrote:

    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 22:59:13 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>wrote:

    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 05:48:36 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>
    wrote:

    BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:
    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 02:46:34 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> >>>>>>wrote:

    https://www.hobsonspledge.nz/meetjanetdickson
    The REA should not take this power on themselves.
    Unless they also insist on Chinese, Tongan, Tokelauan, Samoan, English, >>>>>>>German,
    and another 150 ++ cultures.
    I hope this woman wins and I hope the practice becomes illegal. >>>>>>>It is racist.

    If you want to find out what a complete waste of time, space and money >>>>>>this all is, here is the link.

    https://www.wananga.ac.nz/media/2gqlvpwe/te-kakano-update-v3.pdf

    The real estate authority is yet another one of a long list of >>>>>>government departments that need to be abolished immediately with all >>>>>>involved sacked and put on the dole.

    Bill.

    Thanks Bill, that initiative is bullshit. The REA have no right to do this - it
    should be stopped.

    it is quite common for professional organisations to require some >>>>knowledge of cultural aspects of their job, and how to avoid problems >>>>and get the best results with all clients - as far as I am aware >>>>doctors and teachers and dentists have such cultural issues covered as >>>>part of initial and ongoing professional development course on such >>>>matters from time to time. This was dated April 2023 - is this the >>>>first complaint about it? I have not heard of any previous
    complaints. (And I suspect that in some areas Pacifica issues would >>>>also be covered - they are large enough to matter in some areas but >>>>not others; Chinese are known for using agents who speak their
    language . . .

    While I agree that there has been a bit of a delay with this, the >>>position that Hobson's Pledge are taking is that of over-reach of a >>>professional body with statutory powers. This is the summary of the >>>planned appeal:

    ***
    -RELIEF SOUGHT:
    It is expected that the Court will be asked to determine whether:

    1. The REAs CPD rules are invalid insofar as they purport to extend
    the REAs powers under the Act;

    2. In requiring licensees to undertake Te Kakano as a compulsory >>>condition of their licences, the REA has acted unlawfully,
    irrationally, unreasonably and/or inconsistently with the rights to >>>freedom of expression and conscience guaranteed under the New Zealand >>>Bill of Rights Act 1990.

    3. The REAs commissioning of a single supplier to provide compulsory
    CPD training to all licensees is in breach of Part 2 of the Commerce
    Act 1986.

    4. The Registrars refusal to exempt Janet Dickson from undertaking
    the Te Kakano course should be set aside.

    ***

    So this is an issue of the REA extending its mandate by imposing >>>requirements on its members that are not professionally required.

    That certainly appears to be the attitude of Janet Dickson; it will be
    up to the Court to determine whether that the claims are valid if so
    what actions should be taken in relation to relief sought. Being a
    member of a profession does usually require that at least while acting
    in their capacity as a member of the profession, they act in a
    professional manner and respect rather than offend those relying on
    the integrity of members of the association.

    None of this nonsense was a requirement in the past. Why is it
    suddenly necessary now?

    Bill.

    It is the new government - they are encouraging all sort of changes;
    whatever they think will get them votes next year when the coalition
    falls apart.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Fri Feb 16 20:34:47 2024
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 17:57:10 +1300, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 13:02:15 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>wrote:

    On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 11:50:33 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> >>>wrote:

    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 22:59:13 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>>wrote:

    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 05:48:36 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> >>>>>wrote:

    BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:
    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 02:46:34 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> >>>>>>>wrote:

    https://www.hobsonspledge.nz/meetjanetdickson
    The REA should not take this power on themselves.
    Unless they also insist on Chinese, Tongan, Tokelauan, Samoan, English, >>>>>>>>German,
    and another 150 ++ cultures.
    I hope this woman wins and I hope the practice becomes illegal. >>>>>>>>It is racist.

    If you want to find out what a complete waste of time, space and money >>>>>>>this all is, here is the link.

    https://www.wananga.ac.nz/media/2gqlvpwe/te-kakano-update-v3.pdf

    The real estate authority is yet another one of a long list of >>>>>>>government departments that need to be abolished immediately with all >>>>>>>involved sacked and put on the dole.

    Bill.

    Thanks Bill, that initiative is bullshit. The REA have no right to do >>>>>>this - it
    should be stopped.

    it is quite common for professional organisations to require some >>>>>knowledge of cultural aspects of their job, and how to avoid problems >>>>>and get the best results with all clients - as far as I am aware >>>>>doctors and teachers and dentists have such cultural issues covered as >>>>>part of initial and ongoing professional development course on such >>>>>matters from time to time. This was dated April 2023 - is this the >>>>>first complaint about it? I have not heard of any previous >>>>>complaints. (And I suspect that in some areas Pacifica issues would >>>>>also be covered - they are large enough to matter in some areas but >>>>>not others; Chinese are known for using agents who speak their >>>>>language . . .

    While I agree that there has been a bit of a delay with this, the >>>>position that Hobson's Pledge are taking is that of over-reach of a >>>>professional body with statutory powers. This is the summary of the >>>>planned appeal:

    ***
    -RELIEF SOUGHT:
    It is expected that the Court will be asked to determine whether:

    1. The REAs CPD rules are invalid insofar as they purport to extend >>>>the REAs powers under the Act;

    2. In requiring licensees to undertake Te Kakano as a compulsory >>>>condition of their licences, the REA has acted unlawfully, >>>>irrationally, unreasonably and/or inconsistently with the rights to >>>>freedom of expression and conscience guaranteed under the New Zealand >>>>Bill of Rights Act 1990.

    3. The REAs commissioning of a single supplier to provide compulsory >>>>CPD training to all licensees is in breach of Part 2 of the Commerce >>>>Act 1986.

    4. The Registrars refusal to exempt Janet Dickson from undertaking
    the Te Kakano course should be set aside.

    ***

    So this is an issue of the REA extending its mandate by imposing >>>>requirements on its members that are not professionally required.

    That certainly appears to be the attitude of Janet Dickson; it will be
    up to the Court to determine whether that the claims are valid if so
    what actions should be taken in relation to relief sought. Being a
    member of a profession does usually require that at least while acting
    in their capacity as a member of the profession, they act in a >>>professional manner and respect rather than offend those relying on
    the integrity of members of the association.

    None of this nonsense was a requirement in the past. Why is it
    suddenly necessary now?

    Bill.

    It is the new government - they are encouraging all sort of changes;
    whatever they think will get them votes next year when the coalition
    falls apart.
    Jeez you are a fool - do you really think people believe you? Get a life.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Fri Feb 16 20:37:06 2024
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 00:45:17 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>
    wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 11:50:33 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> >>>wrote:

    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 22:59:13 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>>wrote:

    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 05:48:36 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> >>>>>wrote:

    BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:
    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 02:46:34 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> >>>>>>>wrote:

    https://www.hobsonspledge.nz/meetjanetdickson
    The REA should not take this power on themselves.
    Unless they also insist on Chinese, Tongan, Tokelauan, Samoan, English, >>>>>>>>German,
    and another 150 ++ cultures.
    I hope this woman wins and I hope the practice becomes illegal. >>>>>>>>It is racist.

    If you want to find out what a complete waste of time, space and money >>>>>>>this all is, here is the link.

    https://www.wananga.ac.nz/media/2gqlvpwe/te-kakano-update-v3.pdf

    The real estate authority is yet another one of a long list of >>>>>>>government departments that need to be abolished immediately with all >>>>>>>involved sacked and put on the dole.

    Bill.

    Thanks Bill, that initiative is bullshit. The REA have no right to do >>>>>>this
    - it
    should be stopped.

    it is quite common for professional organisations to require some >>>>>knowledge of cultural aspects of their job, and how to avoid problems >>>>>and get the best results with all clients - as far as I am aware >>>>>doctors and teachers and dentists have such cultural issues covered as >>>>>part of initial and ongoing professional development course on such >>>>>matters from time to time. This was dated April 2023 - is this the >>>>>first complaint about it? I have not heard of any previous >>>>>complaints. (And I suspect that in some areas Pacifica issues would >>>>>also be covered - they are large enough to matter in some areas but >>>>>not others; Chinese are known for using agents who speak their >>>>>language . . .

    While I agree that there has been a bit of a delay with this, the >>>>position that Hobson's Pledge are taking is that of over-reach of a >>>>professional body with statutory powers. This is the summary of the >>>>planned appeal:

    ***
    -RELIEF SOUGHT:
    It is expected that the Court will be asked to determine whether:

    1. The REAs CPD rules are invalid insofar as they purport to extend >>>>the REAs powers under the Act;

    2. In requiring licensees to undertake Te Kakano as a compulsory >>>>condition of their licences, the REA has acted unlawfully, >>>>irrationally, unreasonably and/or inconsistently with the rights to >>>>freedom of expression and conscience guaranteed under the New Zealand >>>>Bill of Rights Act 1990.

    3. The REAs commissioning of a single supplier to provide compulsory >>>>CPD training to all licensees is in breach of Part 2 of the Commerce >>>>Act 1986.

    4. The Registrars refusal to exempt Janet Dickson from undertaking
    the Te Kakano course should be set aside.

    ***

    So this is an issue of the REA extending its mandate by imposing >>>>requirements on its members that are not professionally required.

    That certainly appears to be the attitude of Janet Dickson; it will be
    up to the Court to determine whether that the claims are valid if so
    what actions should be taken in relation to relief sought. Being a
    member of a profession does usually require that at least while acting
    in their capacity as a member of the profession, they act in a >>>professional manner and respect rather than offend those relying on
    the integrity of members of the association.
    That is irrelevant - it is about how far such a body can control their >>members.
    It cannot be entirely open and this is a step much too far.
    There is nothing unprofessional about not knowing the fulll culture of any of >>the dozens of different cultures in this country.

    . . ."knowing the fulll culture of any of the dozens of different
    cultures in this country"

    It is only one and a half hours! Sheesh, what culture could you get
    more than scratching the surface of in 90 minutes! They can only
    cover critical essentials in that time - although perhaps Tony thinks
    his culture could be taught in 10 minutes . . . .
    No that is what you are saying - not me.
    Read above and comprehend.

    There is something unprofessional in having no idea of any cultural
    issues for potential clients in the area in which you work, Tony.
    Is that a question or a guess?

    Abuse gone for now.

    Let us wait and see hat the court says, and then wait again (whatever
    he decision) to see if NAct1st can agree on any legislative changes to >prevent basic information being conveyed to so-called professionals. .
    You are a fool. Period.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gordon@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Sat Feb 17 03:13:37 2024
    On 2024-02-16, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 11:50:33 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>
    wrote:

    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 22:59:13 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>wrote:

    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 05:48:36 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>
    wrote:

    BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:
    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 02:46:34 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> >>>>>wrote:

    https://www.hobsonspledge.nz/meetjanetdickson
    The REA should not take this power on themselves.
    Unless they also insist on Chinese, Tongan, Tokelauan, Samoan, English, >>>>>>German,
    and another 150 ++ cultures.
    I hope this woman wins and I hope the practice becomes illegal.
    It is racist.

    If you want to find out what a complete waste of time, space and money >>>>>this all is, here is the link.

    https://www.wananga.ac.nz/media/2gqlvpwe/te-kakano-update-v3.pdf

    The real estate authority is yet another one of a long list of >>>>>government departments that need to be abolished immediately with all >>>>>involved sacked and put on the dole.

    Bill.

    Thanks Bill, that initiative is bullshit. The REA have no right to do this - it
    should be stopped.

    it is quite common for professional organisations to require some >>>knowledge of cultural aspects of their job, and how to avoid problems
    and get the best results with all clients - as far as I am aware
    doctors and teachers and dentists have such cultural issues covered as >>>part of initial and ongoing professional development course on such >>>matters from time to time. This was dated April 2023 - is this the
    first complaint about it? I have not heard of any previous
    complaints. (And I suspect that in some areas Pacifica issues would
    also be covered - they are large enough to matter in some areas but
    not others; Chinese are known for using agents who speak their
    language . . .

    While I agree that there has been a bit of a delay with this, the
    position that Hobson's Pledge are taking is that of over-reach of a >>professional body with statutory powers. This is the summary of the >>planned appeal:

    ***
    -RELIEF SOUGHT:
    It is expected that the Court will be asked to determine whether:

    1. The REA’s CPD rules are invalid insofar as they purport to extend
    the REA’s powers under the Act;

    2. In requiring licensees to undertake Te Kakano as a compulsory
    condition of their licences, the REA has acted unlawfully,
    irrationally, unreasonably and/or inconsistently with the rights to
    freedom of expression and conscience guaranteed under the New Zealand
    Bill of Rights Act 1990.

    3. The REA’s commissioning of a single supplier to provide compulsory
    CPD training to all licensees is in breach of Part 2 of the Commerce
    Act 1986.

    4. The Registrar’s refusal to exempt Janet Dickson from undertaking
    the Te Kakano course should be set aside.

    ***

    So this is an issue of the REA extending its mandate by imposing >>requirements on its members that are not professionally required.

    That certainly appears to be the attitude of Janet Dickson; it will be
    up to the Court to determine whether that the claims are valid if so
    what actions should be taken in relation to relief sought. Being a
    member of a profession does usually require that at least while acting
    in their capacity as a member of the profession, they act in a
    professional manner and respect rather than offend those relying on
    the integrity of members of the association.

    Let us remember the police and defece forces battle over mandates.

    https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/covid-19-omicron-defence-police-vaccine-mandates-government-appeals-high-court-decision/RM44FQY5HEW26QX3IVFJYHKD7U/

    And also it appears

    "United We Stand
    MEDIA RELEASE
    16 February 2024

    Court of Appeal Decides NZDF Vaccine Mandate Unlawful

    Today the Court of Appeal upheld an appeal by members of the NZDF, and
    decided that the NZDF COVID-19 vaccine mandate is unlawful.

    The High Court ruled in Yardley (2021) that the government vaccine
    mandate for all New Zealand Defence Force and uniformed Police workers
    was unlawful. Despite this, the NZDF then created its own internal
    vaccine mandate forcing those in uniform to get vaccinated or lose their job.

    The Court of Appeal held that the NZDF vaccine mandate limited the right
    to refuse medical treatment and to manifest religious belief.

    The Court of Appeal decided that the Chief of Defence Force was not
    justified in limiting these rights by imposing a vaccine mandate in the
    way that he did.

    This is the third time that members of the NZDF have successfully challenged
    a vaccine mandate.

    While the majority of New Zealand has moved on from mandates and the new government has promised to remove all mandates in the public sector,
    the NZDF internal mandate has remained in full force until today.
    Many highly trained and valuable service personnel have been discharged
    for refusing the COVID vaccine, including recently a young pregnant medic discharged earlier this month.

    The unlawful mandate caused many uniformed professionals to be discharged
    from the NZDF, from new recruits through to highly decorated senior officers across all three services. It has also had many second order effects,
    limiting career options for those that remain and driving many to leave
    of their own accord due to not wanting to remain subject to it.

    Discharging capable service members has also been counterproductive at a
    time where the NZDF is experiencing high levels of attrition and struggling
    to maintain its operational outputs due to record low manning.

    NZDF is the only defence force in the Five Eyes of US, UK, Australia,
    Canada and NZ that has retained a COVID-19 vaccine mandate for its
    service members.

    Those affected are upset and angry about the NZDF creating its own
    unlawful mandate, especially as this happened after the government
    mandate was ruled illegal.

    To be attributed to a spokesperson of United We Stand:

    “Members of the NZDF are everyday New Zealanders who commit their service
    to serving their communities.”

    “We call on the Chief of Defence Force to apologise for the harm he has
    done, and to provide assurances that he will respect the basic rights
    of the soldiers, sailors and airmen who serve New Zealand”

    To be attributed to Matthew Hague, lawyer for the appellants:

    “It is a fantastic result for the protection of fundamental rights in
    New Zealand.”

    “Members of our Armed Forces sacrifice much in the service of our
    country, which means upholding their fundamental rights all the
    more important.”

    “I call on the Chief of Defence Force to reinstate everyone who
    lost their jobs because of the unlawful mandate.”

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gordon@21:1/5 to Tony on Sat Feb 17 02:56:25 2024
    On 2024-02-15, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
    Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> wrote:
    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 22:59:13 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>wrote:

    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 05:48:36 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>
    wrote:

    BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:
    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 02:46:34 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> >>>>>wrote:

    https://www.hobsonspledge.nz/meetjanetdickson
    The REA should not take this power on themselves.
    Unless they also insist on Chinese, Tongan, Tokelauan, Samoan, English, >>>>>>German,
    and another 150 ++ cultures.
    I hope this woman wins and I hope the practice becomes illegal.
    It is racist.

    If you want to find out what a complete waste of time, space and money >>>>>this all is, here is the link.

    https://www.wananga.ac.nz/media/2gqlvpwe/te-kakano-update-v3.pdf

    The real estate authority is yet another one of a long list of >>>>>government departments that need to be abolished immediately with all >>>>>involved sacked and put on the dole.

    Bill.

    Thanks Bill, that initiative is bullshit. The REA have no right to do this -
    it
    should be stopped.

    it is quite common for professional organisations to require some >>>knowledge of cultural aspects of their job, and how to avoid problems
    and get the best results with all clients - as far as I am aware
    doctors and teachers and dentists have such cultural issues covered as >>>part of initial and ongoing professional development course on such >>>matters from time to time. This was dated April 2023 - is this the
    first complaint about it? I have not heard of any previous
    complaints. (And I suspect that in some areas Pacifica issues would
    also be covered - they are large enough to matter in some areas but
    not others; Chinese are known for using agents who speak their
    language . . .

    While I agree that there has been a bit of a delay with this, the
    position that Hobson's Pledge are taking is that of over-reach of a >>professional body with statutory powers. This is the summary of the >>planned appeal:

    ***
    -RELIEF SOUGHT:
    It is expected that the Court will be asked to determine whether:

    1. The REA’s CPD rules are invalid insofar as they purport to extend
    the REA’s powers under the Act;

    2. In requiring licensees to undertake Te Kakano as a compulsory
    condition of their licences, the REA has acted unlawfully,
    irrationally, unreasonably and/or inconsistently with the rights to
    freedom of expression and conscience guaranteed under the New Zealand
    Bill of Rights Act 1990.

    3. The REA’s commissioning of a single supplier to provide compulsory
    CPD training to all licensees is in breach of Part 2 of the Commerce
    Act 1986.

    4. The Registrar’s refusal to exempt Janet Dickson from undertaking
    the Te Kakano course should be set aside.

    ***

    So this is an issue of the REA extending its mandate by imposing >>requirements on its members that are not professionally required.

    Exactly Crash.

    This is another case of where the top of the pyramid (the folks at the top) seem to have lost the principle that they are advocades for the members.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gordon@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Sat Feb 17 03:22:36 2024
    On 2024-02-16, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 17:57:10 +1300, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 13:02:15 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>wrote:

    On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 11:50:33 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> >>>wrote:

    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 22:59:13 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>>wrote:

    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 05:48:36 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> >>>>>wrote:

    BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:
    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 02:46:34 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> >>>>>>>wrote:

    https://www.hobsonspledge.nz/meetjanetdickson
    The REA should not take this power on themselves.
    Unless they also insist on Chinese, Tongan, Tokelauan, Samoan, English, >>>>>>>>German,
    and another 150 ++ cultures.
    I hope this woman wins and I hope the practice becomes illegal. >>>>>>>>It is racist.

    If you want to find out what a complete waste of time, space and money >>>>>>>this all is, here is the link.

    https://www.wananga.ac.nz/media/2gqlvpwe/te-kakano-update-v3.pdf

    The real estate authority is yet another one of a long list of >>>>>>>government departments that need to be abolished immediately with all >>>>>>>involved sacked and put on the dole.

    Bill.

    Thanks Bill, that initiative is bullshit. The REA have no right to do this - it
    should be stopped.

    it is quite common for professional organisations to require some >>>>>knowledge of cultural aspects of their job, and how to avoid problems >>>>>and get the best results with all clients - as far as I am aware >>>>>doctors and teachers and dentists have such cultural issues covered as >>>>>part of initial and ongoing professional development course on such >>>>>matters from time to time. This was dated April 2023 - is this the >>>>>first complaint about it? I have not heard of any previous >>>>>complaints. (And I suspect that in some areas Pacifica issues would >>>>>also be covered - they are large enough to matter in some areas but >>>>>not others; Chinese are known for using agents who speak their >>>>>language . . .

    While I agree that there has been a bit of a delay with this, the >>>>position that Hobson's Pledge are taking is that of over-reach of a >>>>professional body with statutory powers. This is the summary of the >>>>planned appeal:

    ***
    -RELIEF SOUGHT:
    It is expected that the Court will be asked to determine whether:

    1. The REA’s CPD rules are invalid insofar as they purport to extend >>>>the REA’s powers under the Act;

    2. In requiring licensees to undertake Te Kakano as a compulsory >>>>condition of their licences, the REA has acted unlawfully, >>>>irrationally, unreasonably and/or inconsistently with the rights to >>>>freedom of expression and conscience guaranteed under the New Zealand >>>>Bill of Rights Act 1990.

    3. The REA’s commissioning of a single supplier to provide compulsory >>>>CPD training to all licensees is in breach of Part 2 of the Commerce >>>>Act 1986.

    4. The Registrar’s refusal to exempt Janet Dickson from undertaking >>>>the Te Kakano course should be set aside.

    ***

    So this is an issue of the REA extending its mandate by imposing >>>>requirements on its members that are not professionally required.

    That certainly appears to be the attitude of Janet Dickson; it will be
    up to the Court to determine whether that the claims are valid if so
    what actions should be taken in relation to relief sought. Being a
    member of a profession does usually require that at least while acting
    in their capacity as a member of the profession, they act in a >>>professional manner and respect rather than offend those relying on
    the integrity of members of the association.

    None of this nonsense was a requirement in the past. Why is it
    suddenly necessary now?

    Bill.

    It is the new government - they are encouraging all sort of changes;
    whatever they think will get them votes next year when the coalition
    falls apart.

    Another prediction, chalk it up.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gordon@21:1/5 to blah@blah.blah on Sat Feb 17 03:20:27 2024
    On 2024-02-16, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:
    On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 13:02:15 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 11:50:33 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> >>wrote:

    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 22:59:13 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>wrote:

    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 05:48:36 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>
    wrote:

    BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:
    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 02:46:34 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> >>>>>>wrote:

    https://www.hobsonspledge.nz/meetjanetdickson
    The REA should not take this power on themselves.
    Unless they also insist on Chinese, Tongan, Tokelauan, Samoan, English, >>>>>>>German,
    and another 150 ++ cultures.
    I hope this woman wins and I hope the practice becomes illegal. >>>>>>>It is racist.

    If you want to find out what a complete waste of time, space and money >>>>>>this all is, here is the link.

    https://www.wananga.ac.nz/media/2gqlvpwe/te-kakano-update-v3.pdf

    The real estate authority is yet another one of a long list of >>>>>>government departments that need to be abolished immediately with all >>>>>>involved sacked and put on the dole.

    Bill.

    Thanks Bill, that initiative is bullshit. The REA have no right to do this - it
    should be stopped.

    it is quite common for professional organisations to require some >>>>knowledge of cultural aspects of their job, and how to avoid problems >>>>and get the best results with all clients - as far as I am aware >>>>doctors and teachers and dentists have such cultural issues covered as >>>>part of initial and ongoing professional development course on such >>>>matters from time to time. This was dated April 2023 - is this the >>>>first complaint about it? I have not heard of any previous
    complaints. (And I suspect that in some areas Pacifica issues would >>>>also be covered - they are large enough to matter in some areas but >>>>not others; Chinese are known for using agents who speak their
    language . . .

    While I agree that there has been a bit of a delay with this, the >>>position that Hobson's Pledge are taking is that of over-reach of a >>>professional body with statutory powers. This is the summary of the >>>planned appeal:

    ***
    -RELIEF SOUGHT:
    It is expected that the Court will be asked to determine whether:

    1. The REA’s CPD rules are invalid insofar as they purport to extend
    the REA’s powers under the Act;

    2. In requiring licensees to undertake Te Kakano as a compulsory >>>condition of their licences, the REA has acted unlawfully,
    irrationally, unreasonably and/or inconsistently with the rights to >>>freedom of expression and conscience guaranteed under the New Zealand >>>Bill of Rights Act 1990.

    3. The REA’s commissioning of a single supplier to provide compulsory >>>CPD training to all licensees is in breach of Part 2 of the Commerce
    Act 1986.

    4. The Registrar’s refusal to exempt Janet Dickson from undertaking
    the Te Kakano course should be set aside.

    ***

    So this is an issue of the REA extending its mandate by imposing >>>requirements on its members that are not professionally required.

    That certainly appears to be the attitude of Janet Dickson; it will be
    up to the Court to determine whether that the claims are valid if so
    what actions should be taken in relation to relief sought. Being a
    member of a profession does usually require that at least while acting
    in their capacity as a member of the profession, they act in a
    professional manner and respect rather than offend those relying on
    the integrity of members of the association.

    None of this nonsense was a requirement in the past. Why is it
    suddenly necessary now?

    Because many of those in power are woke and going for a power grab.

    http://thepyramidofpower.net gives the history of how we are in todays messed up world. Click around to find books. Chapter 13 is the recent events.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BR@21:1/5 to All on Sun Feb 18 07:16:38 2024
    On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 23:18:10 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
    wrote:


    So this is an issue of the REA extending its mandate by imposing >>>>requirements on its members that are not professionally required.

    That certainly appears to be the attitude of Janet Dickson; it will be
    up to the Court to determine whether that the claims are valid if so
    what actions should be taken in relation to relief sought. Being a
    member of a profession does usually require that at least while acting
    in their capacity as a member of the profession, they act in a >>>professional manner and respect rather than offend those relying on
    the integrity of members of the association.

    None of this nonsense was a requirement in the past. Why is it
    suddenly necessary now?

    Bill.

    It is the new government - they are encouraging all sort of changes;
    whatever they think will get them votes next year when the coalition
    falls apart.

    OK, so this REA mandate is a National/ACT/NZ First imperative.

    Do you agree with it?

    Bill.

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
    https://www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to blah@blah.blah on Sun Feb 18 10:55:24 2024
    On Sun, 18 Feb 2024 07:16:38 +1300, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 23:18:10 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
    wrote:


    So this is an issue of the REA extending its mandate by imposing >>>>>requirements on its members that are not professionally required.

    That certainly appears to be the attitude of Janet Dickson; it will be >>>>up to the Court to determine whether that the claims are valid if so >>>>what actions should be taken in relation to relief sought. Being a >>>>member of a profession does usually require that at least while acting >>>>in their capacity as a member of the profession, they act in a >>>>professional manner and respect rather than offend those relying on
    the integrity of members of the association.

    None of this nonsense was a requirement in the past. Why is it
    suddenly necessary now?

    Bill.

    It is the new government - they are encouraging all sort of changes; >>whatever they think will get them votes next year when the coalition
    falls apart.

    OK, so this REA mandate is a National/ACT/NZ First imperative.

    Do you agree with it?

    Bill.
    The coalition is a very mixed bunch, and the government as a whole is
    aware of the very different expectations of supporters. ACT for
    example have moved from being more authoritarian than National, to now expressing policies that are more libertarian than any other party -
    hence the accommodation of some very disparate views under various
    banners - "Freedumb" being a common characteristic. They did well
    however in the last term by being very disciplined within their
    caucus, with a high degree of internal discipline. That was helped by
    a small caucus - National could not always maintain the same public
    face; which while understandable did affect their appeal to voters.
    The appearance of tolerance of different views applies to this issue -
    it is not important enough for the government to take a stand on, but
    it helps give the appearance of toleration of different viewpoints.
    Yes it is a very minor issue to be taking up court time, but their
    attitude to protestors of all sorts means that to try to shut it down
    would be counterproductive - essentially they don't have any problems
    with nutters going to court on small issues, but when it comes to big decisions, forget local control. The previous government allowed
    Auckland to make a decision on a local petrol tax - the new government unilaterally stopped that, and is now telling the Auckland Council how
    they are allowed to spend the remaining money - they will pass
    legislation to stop local government making decisions they do not
    like.

    So as a ploy to keep votes, it works for the NACT1st government to not interfere with silly disputes that don't matter, but in reality
    freedum is just a slogan to cover progress towards the Atlas Network
    goals.

    Professions largely manage themselves - there has been little
    discussion about why this requirement is there, but professional
    development is a feature of most professions. Real estate is a fairly
    new "profession", and compulsion or cultural sensitivity may not fit
    well with the dog eat dog culture of some close to the edge "in it for
    the quick buck" sales-people - cultural sensitivity , or even
    sensitivity for others is just a mask for elections and getting what
    you want. Most professions have provision for issues and disagreements
    to be raised by members; I have no idea whether that has happened, but
    for a 90 minute session it does seem a lot of fuss about nothing. From
    a political viewpoint however, it is a great distraction from
    important issues.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)