And on a different topic, isn't it interesting that Seymour doesn'tWhat ever got you to post this nonsense? Desperation again - this government will still be here in just under 3 years and will still be removing your favourite undemocratic, ant New Zealand garbage.
believe what Luxon says regarding the Treaty Referendum Bill . . . >https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2024/02/david-seymour-says-he-doesn-t-believe-comment-from-christopher-luxon-on-treaty-principles-bill.html?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
On Thu, 08 Feb 2024 19:40:30 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>
wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>https://www.badnewsletter.com/david-seymour-lies-about-the-atlas-network/ >>>
And on a different topic, isn't it interesting that Seymour doesn't >>>believe what Luxon says regarding the Treaty Referendum Bill . . . >>>https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2024/02/david-seymour-says-he-doesn-t-believe-comment-from-christopher-luxon-on-treaty-principles-bill.html?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitterWhat ever got you to post this nonsense? Desperation again - this government >>will still be here in just under 3 years and will still be removing your >>favourite undemocratic, ant New Zealand garbage.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>https://www.badnewsletter.com/david-seymour-lies-about-the-atlas-network/
What ever got you to post this nonsense? Desperation again - this government >will still be here in just under 3 years and will still be removing your >favourite undemocratic, ant New Zealand garbage.
And on a different topic, isn't it interesting that Seymour doesn't
believe what Luxon says regarding the Treaty Referendum Bill . . . >>https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2024/02/david-seymour-says-he-doesn-t-believe-comment-from-christopher-luxon-on-treaty-principles-bill.html?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
https://www.badnewsletter.com/david-seymour-lies-about-the-atlas-network/
And on a different topic, isn't it interesting that Seymour doesn't
believe what Luxon says regarding the Treaty Referendum Bill . . . >https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2024/02/david-seymour-says-he-doesn-t-believe-comment-from-christopher-luxon-on-treaty-principles-bill.html?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
On Thu, 08 Feb 2024 22:51:59 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
wrote:
https://www.badnewsletter.com/david-seymour-lies-about-the-atlas-network/
And on a different topic, isn't it interesting that Seymour doesn't
believe what Luxon says regarding the Treaty Referendum Bill . . . >>https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2024/02/david-seymour-says-he-doesn-t-believe-comment-from-christopher-luxon-on-treaty-principles-bill.html?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
At least you are being honest in acknowledging political rhetoric
from the first website you reference. Personally I not care at all
what organisations ACT and its leaders may be linked to unless it
affects their ability to be in Government and/or Parliament.
National opposed the Treaty Principles Bill and did so before the
election. ACT managed to get into the coalition agreement an
agreement from National to introduce it and refer it to a Select
Committee as most Bills are. Why do you think ACT wanted this? Has
it only just occurred to you that they think they may be able to get
National to support it further? Well, duh.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 297 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 106:12:39 |
Calls: | 6,661 |
Calls today: | 3 |
Files: | 12,209 |
Messages: | 5,335,403 |