If the media hype is anything to go by it will be a bitching dayWhat a pity that the Maori folk cannot see Waitangi Day as a special day
indeed.
On 5/02/2024 3:46 pm, Mutley wrote:
If the media hype is anything to go by it will be a bitching dayWhat a pity that the Maori folk cannot see Waitangi Day as a special day
indeed.
for all New Zealanders and not just a chance to throw unpleasant things
at politicians.
On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 16:42:11 +1300, Aristotle_the_3rd ><aristotle@wisegreeks.com> wrote:Obviously you were not watching.
On 5/02/2024 3:46 pm, Mutley wrote:
If the media hype is anything to go by it will be a bitching dayWhat a pity that the Maori folk cannot see Waitangi Day as a special day >>for all New Zealanders and not just a chance to throw unpleasant things
indeed.
at politicians.
It turned out fairly well really - the two minor parties got a fairly
rough reception, but they are the ones that had been throwing verbal
bombs at others.
Even then the audience (and yes they were mainlyIncredibly rude of them.
Maori) merely sang while one of them spoke.
The government politiciansNonsense.
had been hoping for a trump like reaction - they largely got clear >disagreement delivered politely but clearly.
I was amused when Seymour said that the Select Committee would beWhat an idiotic cctatement. don't you ever tell the truth?
taking over a year of deliberations but that it would not cost
anything - presumably he thought the MPs and staff involved had
nothing productive to do!
The Prime Minister's priority was to get through to the audience the >importance of Maori improving school attendance statistics, but theThe audience was fairly polite by then because they had been told to be, you must have been watching something else.
audience was fairly polite.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 16:42:11 +1300, Aristotle_the_3rd >><aristotle@wisegreeks.com> wrote:Obviously you were not watching.
On 5/02/2024 3:46 pm, Mutley wrote:
If the media hype is anything to go by it will be a bitching dayWhat a pity that the Maori folk cannot see Waitangi Day as a special day >>>for all New Zealanders and not just a chance to throw unpleasant things >>>at politicians.
indeed.
It turned out fairly well really - the two minor parties got a fairly
rough reception, but they are the ones that had been throwing verbal
bombs at others.
Even then the audience (and yes they were mainlyIncredibly rude of them.
Maori) merely sang while one of them spoke.
The government politiciansNonsense.
had been hoping for a trump like reaction - they largely got clear >>disagreement delivered politely but clearly.
What an idiotic cctatement. don't you ever tell the truth?
I was amused when Seymour said that the Select Committee would be
taking over a year of deliberations but that it would not cost
anything - presumably he thought the MPs and staff involved had
nothing productive to do!
The audience was fairly polite by then because they had been told to be, you >must have been watching something else.
The Prime Minister's priority was to get through to the audience the >>importance of Maori improving school attendance statistics, but the >>audience was fairly polite.
On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 16:42:11 +1300, Aristotle_the_3rd ><aristotle@wisegreeks.com> wrote:
On 5/02/2024 3:46 pm, Mutley wrote:
If the media hype is anything to go by it will be a bitching dayWhat a pity that the Maori folk cannot see Waitangi Day as a special day >>for all New Zealanders and not just a chance to throw unpleasant things
indeed.
at politicians.
It turned out fairly well really - the two minor parties got a fairly
rough reception, but they are the ones that had been throwing verbal
bombs at others. Even then the audience (and yes they were mainly
Maori) merely sang while one of them spoke. The government politicians
had been hoping for a trump like reaction - they largely got clear >disagreement delivered politely but clearly.
I was amused when Seymour said that the Select Committee would be
taking over a year of deliberations but that it would not cost
anything - presumably he thought the MPs and staff involved had
nothing productive to do!
The Prime Minister's priority was to get through to the audience the >importance of Maori improving school attendance statistics, but the
audience was fairly polite.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 16:42:11 +1300, Aristotle_the_3rd >><aristotle@wisegreeks.com> wrote:
On 5/02/2024 3:46 pm, Mutley wrote:
If the media hype is anything to go by it will be a bitching dayWhat a pity that the Maori folk cannot see Waitangi Day as a special day >>>for all New Zealanders and not just a chance to throw unpleasant things >>>at politicians.
indeed.
It turned out fairly well really - the two minor parties got a fairly
rough reception, but they are the ones that had been throwing verbal
bombs at others. Even then the audience (and yes they were mainly
Maori) merely sang while one of them spoke. The government politicians
had been hoping for a trump like reaction - they largely got clear >>disagreement delivered politely but clearly.
I was amused when Seymour said that the Select Committee would be
taking over a year of deliberations but that it would not cost
anything - presumably he thought the MPs and staff involved had
nothing productive to do!
The Prime Minister's priority was to get through to the audience the >>importance of Maori improving school attendance statistics, but the >>audience was fairly polite.
You must have been watching a different news channel to me . It was
all Maori confrontation and nothing else. The term sedition comes to
mind when suggesting that there should be a war of Maori Vs everyone
else.
On Tue, 06 Feb 2024 05:36:52 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>
wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 06 Feb 2024 10:46:41 +1300, Mutley <mutley2000@hotmail.com> >>>wrote:You are either lying or unable to perceive reality.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 16:42:11 +1300, Aristotle_the_3rd >>>>><aristotle@wisegreeks.com> wrote:
On 5/02/2024 3:46 pm, Mutley wrote:
If the media hype is anything to go by it will be a bitching day >>>>>>> indeed.What a pity that the Maori folk cannot see Waitangi Day as a special day >>>>>>for all New Zealanders and not just a chance to throw unpleasant things >>>>>>at politicians.
It turned out fairly well really - the two minor parties got a fairly >>>>>rough reception, but they are the ones that had been throwing verbal >>>>>bombs at others. Even then the audience (and yes they were mainly >>>>>Maori) merely sang while one of them spoke. The government politicians >>>>>had been hoping for a trump like reaction - they largely got clear >>>>>disagreement delivered politely but clearly.
I was amused when Seymour said that the Select Committee would be >>>>>taking over a year of deliberations but that it would not cost >>>>>anything - presumably he thought the MPs and staff involved had >>>>>nothing productive to do!
The Prime Minister's priority was to get through to the audience the >>>>>importance of Maori improving school attendance statistics, but the >>>>>audience was fairly polite.
You must have been watching a different news channel to me . It was >>>>all Maori confrontation and nothing else. The term sedition comes to >>>>mind when suggesting that there should be a war of Maori Vs everyone >>>>else.
I was listening though radio, and Luxon was quite clearly audible. ,
with very little background noise for such a large crowd. I heard no >>>suggestion from him or anyone else of a war of Maori vs everyone else
- and I suspect many non-Maori supporters of all political parties,
but perhaps in particular National party voters, would not support the >>>government changing the terms of a contract by legislation.
Syemour and Peters were both deliberately heckled and there was at least one >>very loud Haka and some loud singing whilst they were speaking. As ai alluded >>to in another post they were told to shut up and had done so when Luxon was >>speaking. You really do cherry pick don't you?
Nobody in government is suggesting a change to any contract by legislation, >>however that does not mean they do not have the right to do so.
Well put Tony. Rich's reference to the sanctity and legal status of a >contract is also ludicrous given that all the signatories to the
Treaty are long gone. As a political agreement, there is no sanctity
of contract, just like the signatories to the UN Charter are free to
wage war in spite of it.
Clearly there are many Maori who do not want any debate on the
principles of the Treaty and that can only be because the result would >diminish their status and entitlements.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 06 Feb 2024 10:46:41 +1300, Mutley <mutley2000@hotmail.com>You are either lying or unable to perceive reality.
wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 16:42:11 +1300, Aristotle_the_3rd >>>><aristotle@wisegreeks.com> wrote:
On 5/02/2024 3:46 pm, Mutley wrote:
If the media hype is anything to go by it will be a bitching dayWhat a pity that the Maori folk cannot see Waitangi Day as a special day >>>>>for all New Zealanders and not just a chance to throw unpleasant things >>>>>at politicians.
indeed.
It turned out fairly well really - the two minor parties got a fairly >>>>rough reception, but they are the ones that had been throwing verbal >>>>bombs at others. Even then the audience (and yes they were mainly >>>>Maori) merely sang while one of them spoke. The government politicians >>>>had been hoping for a trump like reaction - they largely got clear >>>>disagreement delivered politely but clearly.
I was amused when Seymour said that the Select Committee would be >>>>taking over a year of deliberations but that it would not cost
anything - presumably he thought the MPs and staff involved had
nothing productive to do!
The Prime Minister's priority was to get through to the audience the >>>>importance of Maori improving school attendance statistics, but the >>>>audience was fairly polite.
You must have been watching a different news channel to me . It was
all Maori confrontation and nothing else. The term sedition comes to >>>mind when suggesting that there should be a war of Maori Vs everyone >>>else.
I was listening though radio, and Luxon was quite clearly audible. ,
with very little background noise for such a large crowd. I heard no >>suggestion from him or anyone else of a war of Maori vs everyone else
- and I suspect many non-Maori supporters of all political parties,
but perhaps in particular National party voters, would not support the >>government changing the terms of a contract by legislation.
Syemour and Peters were both deliberately heckled and there was at least one >very loud Haka and some loud singing whilst they were speaking. As ai alluded >to in another post they were told to shut up and had done so when Luxon was >speaking. You really do cherry pick don't you?
Nobody in government is suggesting a change to any contract by legislation, >however that does not mean they do not have the right to do so.
On Tue, 06 Feb 2024 10:46:41 +1300, Mutley <mutley2000@hotmail.com>You are either lying or unable to perceive reality.
wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 16:42:11 +1300, Aristotle_the_3rd >>><aristotle@wisegreeks.com> wrote:
On 5/02/2024 3:46 pm, Mutley wrote:
If the media hype is anything to go by it will be a bitching dayWhat a pity that the Maori folk cannot see Waitangi Day as a special day >>>>for all New Zealanders and not just a chance to throw unpleasant things >>>>at politicians.
indeed.
It turned out fairly well really - the two minor parties got a fairly >>>rough reception, but they are the ones that had been throwing verbal >>>bombs at others. Even then the audience (and yes they were mainly
Maori) merely sang while one of them spoke. The government politicians >>>had been hoping for a trump like reaction - they largely got clear >>>disagreement delivered politely but clearly.
I was amused when Seymour said that the Select Committee would be
taking over a year of deliberations but that it would not cost
anything - presumably he thought the MPs and staff involved had
nothing productive to do!
The Prime Minister's priority was to get through to the audience the >>>importance of Maori improving school attendance statistics, but the >>>audience was fairly polite.
You must have been watching a different news channel to me . It was
all Maori confrontation and nothing else. The term sedition comes to
mind when suggesting that there should be a war of Maori Vs everyone
else.
I was listening though radio, and Luxon was quite clearly audible. ,
with very little background noise for such a large crowd. I heard no >suggestion from him or anyone else of a war of Maori vs everyone else
- and I suspect many non-Maori supporters of all political parties,
but perhaps in particular National party voters, would not support the >government changing the terms of a contract by legislation.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:As I said above: "the two minor parties got a fairly rough reception,
On Tue, 06 Feb 2024 10:46:41 +1300, Mutley <mutley2000@hotmail.com>You are either lying or unable to perceive reality.
wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 16:42:11 +1300, Aristotle_the_3rd >>>><aristotle@wisegreeks.com> wrote:
On 5/02/2024 3:46 pm, Mutley wrote:
If the media hype is anything to go by it will be a bitching dayWhat a pity that the Maori folk cannot see Waitangi Day as a special day >>>>>for all New Zealanders and not just a chance to throw unpleasant things >>>>>at politicians.
indeed.
It turned out fairly well really - the two minor parties got a fairly >>>>rough reception, but they are the ones that had been throwing verbal >>>>bombs at others. Even then the audience (and yes they were mainly >>>>Maori) merely sang while one of them spoke. The government politicians >>>>had been hoping for a trump like reaction - they largely got clear >>>>disagreement delivered politely but clearly.
I was amused when Seymour said that the Select Committee would be >>>>taking over a year of deliberations but that it would not cost
anything - presumably he thought the MPs and staff involved had
nothing productive to do!
The Prime Minister's priority was to get through to the audience the >>>>importance of Maori improving school attendance statistics, but the >>>>audience was fairly polite.
You must have been watching a different news channel to me . It was
all Maori confrontation and nothing else. The term sedition comes to >>>mind when suggesting that there should be a war of Maori Vs everyone >>>else.
I was listening though radio, and Luxon was quite clearly audible. ,
with very little background noise for such a large crowd. I heard no >>suggestion from him or anyone else of a war of Maori vs everyone else
- and I suspect many non-Maori supporters of all political parties,
but perhaps in particular National party voters, would not support the >>government changing the terms of a contract by legislation.
Syemour and Peters were both deliberately heckled and there was at least one >very loud Haka and some loud singing whilst they were speaking. As ai alluded >to in another post they were told to shut up and had done so when Luxon was >speaking. You really do cherry pick don't you?
Nobody in government is suggesting a change to any contract by legislation, >however that does not mean they do not have the right to do so.
On Tue, 06 Feb 2024 05:36:52 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>No that is a lie - the verbal bombs were thrown at them first. And have been for a some weeks. This is not in isolation and never can be.
wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:As I said above: "the two minor parties got a fairly rough reception,
On Tue, 06 Feb 2024 10:46:41 +1300, Mutley <mutley2000@hotmail.com> >>>wrote:You are either lying or unable to perceive reality.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 16:42:11 +1300, Aristotle_the_3rd >>>>><aristotle@wisegreeks.com> wrote:
On 5/02/2024 3:46 pm, Mutley wrote:
If the media hype is anything to go by it will be a bitching day >>>>>>> indeed.What a pity that the Maori folk cannot see Waitangi Day as a special day >>>>>>for all New Zealanders and not just a chance to throw unpleasant things >>>>>>at politicians.
It turned out fairly well really - the two minor parties got a fairly >>>>>rough reception, but they are the ones that had been throwing verbal >>>>>bombs at others. Even then the audience (and yes they were mainly >>>>>Maori) merely sang while one of them spoke. The government politicians >>>>>had been hoping for a trump like reaction - they largely got clear >>>>>disagreement delivered politely but clearly.
I was amused when Seymour said that the Select Committee would be >>>>>taking over a year of deliberations but that it would not cost >>>>>anything - presumably he thought the MPs and staff involved had >>>>>nothing productive to do!
The Prime Minister's priority was to get through to the audience the >>>>>importance of Maori improving school attendance statistics, but the >>>>>audience was fairly polite.
You must have been watching a different news channel to me . It was >>>>all Maori confrontation and nothing else. The term sedition comes to >>>>mind when suggesting that there should be a war of Maori Vs everyone >>>>else.
I was listening though radio, and Luxon was quite clearly audible. ,
with very little background noise for such a large crowd. I heard no >>>suggestion from him or anyone else of a war of Maori vs everyone else
- and I suspect many non-Maori supporters of all political parties,
but perhaps in particular National party voters, would not support the >>>government changing the terms of a contract by legislation.
Syemour and Peters were both deliberately heckled and there was at least one >>very loud Haka and some loud singing whilst they were speaking. As ai alluded >>to in another post they were told to shut up and had done so when Luxon was >>speaking. You really do cherry pick don't you?
but they are the ones that had been throwing verbal bombs at others"
and: "The Prime Minister's priority was to get through to theBecause, and only because the audience was told to be quiet.
audience the importance of Maori improving school attendance
statistics, but the audience was fairly polite."
Try reading before commenting, Tony . . .Try reading before lying.
That is a lie. ACT are not saying that, they are asking for a review - they have not ever stated what they want to change only that they want it reviewed. You are a cretin, I have never seen anybody that lies so consistently and so transparently as you do.Nobody in government is suggesting a change to any contract by legislation, >>however that does not mean they do not have the right to do so.
Yes, the ACT Party do, and in the Coalition agreements this will get
support for a 1st reading through to select Committee stage.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 06 Feb 2024 05:36:52 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>No that is a lie - the verbal bombs were thrown at them first. And have been >for a some weeks. This is not in isolation and never can be.
wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:As I said above: "the two minor parties got a fairly rough reception,
On Tue, 06 Feb 2024 10:46:41 +1300, Mutley <mutley2000@hotmail.com> >>>>wrote:You are either lying or unable to perceive reality.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 16:42:11 +1300, Aristotle_the_3rd >>>>>><aristotle@wisegreeks.com> wrote:
On 5/02/2024 3:46 pm, Mutley wrote:
If the media hype is anything to go by it will be a bitching day >>>>>>>> indeed.What a pity that the Maori folk cannot see Waitangi Day as a special day >>>>>>>for all New Zealanders and not just a chance to throw unpleasant things >>>>>>>at politicians.
It turned out fairly well really - the two minor parties got a fairly >>>>>>rough reception, but they are the ones that had been throwing verbal >>>>>>bombs at others. Even then the audience (and yes they were mainly >>>>>>Maori) merely sang while one of them spoke. The government politicians >>>>>>had been hoping for a trump like reaction - they largely got clear >>>>>>disagreement delivered politely but clearly.
I was amused when Seymour said that the Select Committee would be >>>>>>taking over a year of deliberations but that it would not cost >>>>>>anything - presumably he thought the MPs and staff involved had >>>>>>nothing productive to do!
The Prime Minister's priority was to get through to the audience the >>>>>>importance of Maori improving school attendance statistics, but the >>>>>>audience was fairly polite.
You must have been watching a different news channel to me . It was >>>>>all Maori confrontation and nothing else. The term sedition comes to >>>>>mind when suggesting that there should be a war of Maori Vs everyone >>>>>else.
I was listening though radio, and Luxon was quite clearly audible. , >>>>with very little background noise for such a large crowd. I heard no >>>>suggestion from him or anyone else of a war of Maori vs everyone else
- and I suspect many non-Maori supporters of all political parties,
but perhaps in particular National party voters, would not support the >>>>government changing the terms of a contract by legislation.
Syemour and Peters were both deliberately heckled and there was at least one >>>very loud Haka and some loud singing whilst they were speaking. As ai alluded
to in another post they were told to shut up and had done so when Luxon was >>>speaking. You really do cherry pick don't you?
but they are the ones that had been throwing verbal bombs at others"
Because, and only because the audience was told to be quiet.
and: "The Prime Minister's priority was to get through to the
audience the importance of Maori improving school attendance
statistics, but the audience was fairly polite."
Try reading before lying.
Try reading before commenting, Tony . . .
That is a lie. ACT are not saying that, they are asking for a review - they >have not ever stated what they want to change only that they want it reviewed. >You are a cretin, I have never seen anybody that lies so consistently and so >transparently as you do.
Nobody in government is suggesting a change to any contract by legislation, >>>however that does not mean they do not have the right to do so.
Yes, the ACT Party do, and in the Coalition agreements this will get >>support for a 1st reading through to select Committee stage.
On Tue, 06 Feb 2024 08:07:38 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>
wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 06 Feb 2024 05:36:52 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>No that is a lie - the verbal bombs were thrown at them first. And have been >>for a some weeks. This is not in isolation and never can be.
wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:As I said above: "the two minor parties got a fairly rough reception,
On Tue, 06 Feb 2024 10:46:41 +1300, Mutley <mutley2000@hotmail.com> >>>>>wrote:You are either lying or unable to perceive reality.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 16:42:11 +1300, Aristotle_the_3rd >>>>>>><aristotle@wisegreeks.com> wrote:
On 5/02/2024 3:46 pm, Mutley wrote:
If the media hype is anything to go by it will be a bitching day >>>>>>>>> indeed.What a pity that the Maori folk cannot see Waitangi Day as a special day
for all New Zealanders and not just a chance to throw unpleasant things >>>>>>>>at politicians.
It turned out fairly well really - the two minor parties got a fairly >>>>>>>rough reception, but they are the ones that had been throwing verbal >>>>>>>bombs at others. Even then the audience (and yes they were mainly >>>>>>>Maori) merely sang while one of them spoke. The government politicians >>>>>>>had been hoping for a trump like reaction - they largely got clear >>>>>>>disagreement delivered politely but clearly.
I was amused when Seymour said that the Select Committee would be >>>>>>>taking over a year of deliberations but that it would not cost >>>>>>>anything - presumably he thought the MPs and staff involved had >>>>>>>nothing productive to do!
The Prime Minister's priority was to get through to the audience the >>>>>>>importance of Maori improving school attendance statistics, but the >>>>>>>audience was fairly polite.
You must have been watching a different news channel to me . It was >>>>>>all Maori confrontation and nothing else. The term sedition comes to >>>>>>mind when suggesting that there should be a war of Maori Vs everyone >>>>>>else.
I was listening though radio, and Luxon was quite clearly audible. , >>>>>with very little background noise for such a large crowd. I heard no >>>>>suggestion from him or anyone else of a war of Maori vs everyone else >>>>>- and I suspect many non-Maori supporters of all political parties, >>>>>but perhaps in particular National party voters, would not support the >>>>>government changing the terms of a contract by legislation.
Syemour and Peters were both deliberately heckled and there was at least one
very loud Haka and some loud singing whilst they were speaking. As ai alluded
to in another post they were told to shut up and had done so when Luxon was >>>>speaking. You really do cherry pick don't you?
but they are the ones that had been throwing verbal bombs at others"
Because, and only because the audience was told to be quiet.
and: "The Prime Minister's priority was to get through to the
audience the importance of Maori improving school attendance
statistics, but the audience was fairly polite."
Try reading before lying.
Try reading before commenting, Tony . . .
That is a lie. ACT are not saying that, they are asking for a review - they >>have not ever stated what they want to change only that they want it reviewed.
Nobody in government is suggesting a change to any contract by legislation, >>>>however that does not mean they do not have the right to do so.
Yes, the ACT Party do, and in the Coalition agreements this will get >>>support for a 1st reading through to select Committee stage.
You are a cretin, I have never seen anybody that lies so consistently and so >>transparently as you do.
They published a draft Bill - have you looked at it?
On Tue, 06 Feb 2024 08:07:38 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>Have you?
wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 06 Feb 2024 05:36:52 GMT, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz>No that is a lie - the verbal bombs were thrown at them first. And have been >>for a some weeks. This is not in isolation and never can be.
wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:As I said above: "the two minor parties got a fairly rough reception,
On Tue, 06 Feb 2024 10:46:41 +1300, Mutley <mutley2000@hotmail.com> >>>>>wrote:You are either lying or unable to perceive reality.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 16:42:11 +1300, Aristotle_the_3rd >>>>>>><aristotle@wisegreeks.com> wrote:
On 5/02/2024 3:46 pm, Mutley wrote:
If the media hype is anything to go by it will be a bitching day >>>>>>>>> indeed.What a pity that the Maori folk cannot see Waitangi Day as a special >>>>>>>>day
for all New Zealanders and not just a chance to throw unpleasant things >>>>>>>>at politicians.
It turned out fairly well really - the two minor parties got a fairly >>>>>>>rough reception, but they are the ones that had been throwing verbal >>>>>>>bombs at others. Even then the audience (and yes they were mainly >>>>>>>Maori) merely sang while one of them spoke. The government politicians >>>>>>>had been hoping for a trump like reaction - they largely got clear >>>>>>>disagreement delivered politely but clearly.
I was amused when Seymour said that the Select Committee would be >>>>>>>taking over a year of deliberations but that it would not cost >>>>>>>anything - presumably he thought the MPs and staff involved had >>>>>>>nothing productive to do!
The Prime Minister's priority was to get through to the audience the >>>>>>>importance of Maori improving school attendance statistics, but the >>>>>>>audience was fairly polite.
You must have been watching a different news channel to me . It was >>>>>>all Maori confrontation and nothing else. The term sedition comes to >>>>>>mind when suggesting that there should be a war of Maori Vs everyone >>>>>>else.
I was listening though radio, and Luxon was quite clearly audible. , >>>>>with very little background noise for such a large crowd. I heard no >>>>>suggestion from him or anyone else of a war of Maori vs everyone else >>>>>- and I suspect many non-Maori supporters of all political parties, >>>>>but perhaps in particular National party voters, would not support the >>>>>government changing the terms of a contract by legislation.
Syemour and Peters were both deliberately heckled and there was at least >>>>one
very loud Haka and some loud singing whilst they were speaking. As ai >>>>alluded
to in another post they were told to shut up and had done so when Luxon was >>>>speaking. You really do cherry pick don't you?
but they are the ones that had been throwing verbal bombs at others"
Because, and only because the audience was told to be quiet.
and: "The Prime Minister's priority was to get through to the
audience the importance of Maori improving school attendance
statistics, but the audience was fairly polite."
Try reading before lying.
Try reading before commenting, Tony . . .
That is a lie. ACT are not saying that, they are asking for a review - they >>have not ever stated what they want to change only that they want it reviewed.
Nobody in government is suggesting a change to any contract by legislation, >>>>however that does not mean they do not have the right to do so.
Yes, the ACT Party do, and in the Coalition agreements this will get >>>support for a 1st reading through to select Committee stage.
You are a cretin, I have never seen anybody that lies so consistently and so >>transparently as you do.
They published a draft Bill - have you looked at it?
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 104:26:39 |
| Calls: | 6,660 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 12,209 |
| Messages: | 5,335,176 |