1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. NZ.GENERAL

  • Re: Luxon Won?t Let In The Nuclear Stuff

    From Tony@21:1/5 to Lawrence D'Oliveiro on Thu Feb 1 05:57:55 2024
    Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
    Nucular, on the other hand, he might let past.
    Wow, what a brilliant piece of politic

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Tony on Thu Feb 1 05:59:20 2024
    Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
    Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
    Nucular, on the other hand, he might let past.
    Wow, what a brilliant piece of politic
    Please ignore - wrong thread.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Lawrence D'Oliveiro on Fri Feb 2 03:21:38 2024
    Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
    On Fri, 02 Feb 2024 15:01:14 +1300, Mutley wrote:

    Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

    Nucular, on the other hand, he might let past.

    I hope he does. This countries kept it's head in the sand over
    Nuclear power long enough.

    But he seems to be talking Nucular, instead.
    Jeez - do you ever discuss anything that matters?
    It's not as if you understand English that well - "self-evident" fooled you I recall.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to lizandtony@orcon.net.nz on Fri Feb 2 17:51:13 2024
    On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 04:25:31 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
    On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 03:21:38 -0000 (UTC), Tony wrote:

    "self-evident" fooled you I recall.

    No, you were the one fooled into believing it meant something.
    It does, and I got it perfectly - you assumed, incorrectly, that you inderstood
    the meaning, you didn't, I did.
    And such a simple bit of English too.
    Sad really.
    But there is a lesson in it - I hope you learned that.
    Would that be a Nucular lesson, Tony?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Lawrence D'Oliveiro on Fri Feb 2 04:25:31 2024
    Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
    On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 03:21:38 -0000 (UTC), Tony wrote:

    "self-evident" fooled you I recall.

    No, you were the one fooled into believing it meant something.
    It does, and I got it perfectly - you assumed, incorrectly, that you inderstood the meaning, you didn't, I did.
    And such a simple bit of English too.
    Sad really.
    But there is a lesson in it - I hope you learned that.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Fri Feb 2 05:30:30 2024
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 04:25:31 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
    On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 03:21:38 -0000 (UTC), Tony wrote:

    "self-evident" fooled you I recall.

    No, you were the one fooled into believing it meant something.
    It does, and I got it perfectly - you assumed, incorrectly, that you >>inderstood
    the meaning, you didn't, I did.
    And such a simple bit of English too.
    Sad really.
    But there is a lesson in it - I hope you learned that.
    Would that be a Nucular lesson, Tony?
    I see your English has not improved.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Lawrence D'Oliveiro on Fri Feb 2 05:33:20 2024
    Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
    On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 04:25:31 -0000 (UTC), Tony wrote:

    Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

    On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 03:21:38 -0000 (UTC), Tony wrote:

    "self-evident" fooled you I recall.

    No, you were the one fooled into believing it meant something.

    It does ...

    Explain 1) what it means, and 2) how that proves your argument.
    No. I know what it means and that knowledge has nothing to do with the argument.
    It was you that didn't know what it means.
    I recommend a good English dictionary, there are several.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Lawrence D'Oliveiro on Fri Feb 2 22:00:08 2024
    Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
    On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 05:33:20 -0000 (UTC), Tony wrote:

    Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

    On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 04:25:31 -0000 (UTC), Tony wrote:

    Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

    On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 03:21:38 -0000 (UTC), Tony wrote:

    "self-evident" fooled you I recall.

    No, you were the one fooled into believing it meant something.

    It does ...

    Explain 1) what it means, and 2) how that proves your argument.

    No. I know what it means and that knowledge has nothing to do with the
    argument.

    So I wonder why you brought it up? I’m sure the reason is “self-evident” >in your head ...
    Correct. But I see you are struggling to comprehend, no real surprise.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to lizandtony@orcon.net.nz on Sat Feb 3 11:17:16 2024
    On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 22:00:08 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
    On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 05:33:20 -0000 (UTC), Tony wrote:

    Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

    On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 04:25:31 -0000 (UTC), Tony wrote:

    Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

    On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 03:21:38 -0000 (UTC), Tony wrote:

    "self-evident" fooled you I recall.

    No, you were the one fooled into believing it meant something.

    It does ...

    Explain 1) what it means, and 2) how that proves your argument.

    No. I know what it means and that knowledge has nothing to do with the
    argument.

    So I wonder why you brought it up? I’m sure the reason is “self-evident?
    in your head ...
    Correct. But I see you are struggling to comprehend, no real surprise.

    An example may be useful. Self-evidently, Tony did not understand the
    question or e would have answered it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Sat Feb 3 00:01:25 2024
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 22:00:08 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
    On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 05:33:20 -0000 (UTC), Tony wrote:

    Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

    On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 04:25:31 -0000 (UTC), Tony wrote:

    Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

    On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 03:21:38 -0000 (UTC), Tony wrote:

    "self-evident" fooled you I recall.

    No, you were the one fooled into believing it meant something.

    It does ...

    Explain 1) what it means, and 2) how that proves your argument.

    No. I know what it means and that knowledge has nothing to do with the >>>> argument.

    So I wonder why you brought it up? I’m sure the reason is >>>“self-evident?
    in your head ...
    Correct. But I see you are struggling to comprehend, no real surprise.

    An example may be useful. Self-evidently, Tony did not understand the >question or e would have answered it.
    Self evidently you did not understand it because I did.
    Self evidently you are a childish little twerp/
    If you cannot add to a thread piss off.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)