• Is This A =?UTF-8?B?4oCcVGVycm9yaXN04oCd?= Attack?

    From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jan 30 01:46:18 2024
    That drone strike against a US military facility in Jordan is being
    described by many as a “terrorist” attack <https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/1/29/what-is-tower-22-the-jordan-based-us-outpost-targeted-in-a-drone-strike>.

    But the usual definition of “terrorism” is “indiscriminate violence against civilians for political purposes”. And this was not a
    “civilian” facility, it was very much a military one. So how could
    that be described as “terrorism”?

    (Of course, the rights and wrongs of the attack are an entirely
    separate issue.)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Willy Nilly@21:1/5 to Lawrence D'Oliveiro on Tue Jan 30 02:41:37 2024
    On Tue, 30 Jan 2024, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
    But the usual definition of “terrorism” is “indiscriminate violence >against civilians for political purposes”.

    So why haven't you described the October 7 Hamas attack on Israel as
    terrorism?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to Willy Nilly on Tue Jan 30 03:24:36 2024
    On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 02:41:37 GMT, Willy Nilly wrote:

    So why haven't you described the October 7 Hamas attack on Israel as terrorism?

    “It is important to also recognize the attacks by Hamas did not happen
    in a vacuum. The Palestinian people have been subjected to 56 years of
    suffocating occupation. They have seen their land steadily devoured by
    settlements and plagued by violence; their economy stifled; their
    people displaced and their homes demolished. Their hopes for a
    political solution to their plight have been vanishing.

    “The grievances of the Palestinian people cannot justify the appalling
    attacks by Hamas. And those appalling attacks cannot justify the
    collective punishment of the Palestinian people.”

    -- Antonio Guterrez, UN Secretary-General

    from <https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/un-chief-says-hamas-attacks-did-not-occur-in-vacuum-sparking-israeli-fury/>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to Tony on Tue Jan 30 03:45:13 2024
    On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 03:31:48 -0000 (UTC), Tony wrote:

    Basically the word terrorist is meaningless now.

    One time I actually agree with you.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to Willy Nilly on Tue Jan 30 05:46:37 2024
    On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 05:42:44 GMT, Willy Nilly wrote:

    On Tue, 30 Jan 2024, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

    On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 02:41:37 GMT, Willy Nilly wrote:
    So why haven't you described the October 7 Hamas attack on Israel as
    terrorism?

    ... The Palestinian people have been subjected to 56 years of
    suffocating occupation.

    Gaza was not occupied, moron ...

    When somebody else controls all entry to and exit from your territory, restricts your ability to earn a living from and travel through your own territorial waters, controls your own airspace, determines what goods are
    and aren’t allowed in or out, whether you get electrical power or not, monitors your telecommunications, sets up surveillance cameras around your border and shoots at anybody coming too close to it, conducts military
    raids at will into your territory ...

    If that is not “occupation”, what do you call it?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Willy Nilly@21:1/5 to Lawrence D'Oliveiro on Tue Jan 30 05:42:44 2024
    On Tue, 30 Jan 2024, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
    On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 02:41:37 GMT, Willy Nilly wrote:
    So why haven't you described the October 7 Hamas attack on Israel as
    terrorism?

    ... The Palestinian people have been subjected to 56 years of
    suffocating occupation.

    Gaza was not occupied, moron, Israel fully withdrew from it 20 years
    ago, in a bid for peace. But of course it went the other way. And
    still you won't condemn Hamas terrorism. You are 100% phony.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to Willy Nilly on Tue Jan 30 06:53:19 2024
    On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 06:47:20 GMT, Willy Nilly wrote:

    On Tue, 30 Jan 2024, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

    On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 05:42:44 GMT, Willy Nilly wrote:

    Gaza was not occupied, moron ...

    When somebody else controls all entry to and exit from your territory, >>restricts your ability to earn a living from and travel through your own >>territorial waters, controls your own airspace, determines what goods
    are and aren’t allowed in or out, whether you get electrical power or >>not, monitors your telecommunications, sets up surveillance cameras
    around your border and shoots at anybody coming too close to it,
    conducts military raids at will into your territory ...

    You are putting the cart before the horse. Those restrictions were put
    into place following Gazan terrorist acts, in a bid to stop terrorism.

    Einstein’s definition of insanity: trying the same thing over and over, hoping for a different outcome each time.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Willy Nilly@21:1/5 to Lawrence D'Oliveiro on Tue Jan 30 06:47:20 2024
    On Tue, 30 Jan 2024, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
    On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 05:42:44 GMT, Willy Nilly wrote:
    Gaza was not occupied, moron ...

    When somebody else controls all entry to and exit from your territory, >restricts your ability to earn a living from and travel through your own >territorial waters, controls your own airspace, determines what goods are
    and aren’t allowed in or out, whether you get electrical power or not, >monitors your telecommunications, sets up surveillance cameras around your >border and shoots at anybody coming too close to it, conducts military
    raids at will into your territory ...

    You are putting the cart before the horse. Those restrictions were
    put into place following Gazan terrorist acts, in a bid to stop
    terrorism.

    Your phrase "whether you get electrical power or not" is a real joke,
    as rarely did the media report that Israel supplied Gaza electricity,
    even during times of Gaza rockets and terrorism. In the last 10
    years, the UN and various idiot countries have given Gaza so much
    money, and did Gaza use that to build their own electricity generating
    plants? Of course not, just to dig tunnels and build rockets.

    If that is not “occupation”, what do you call it?

    I call your encyclopedic knowledge of this as signalling that you are
    a willing propaganda puppet. Here's the elephant in the room, missing
    from your list: Do you realise that there were only 100,000 Gazans in
    1948, and today there are 2.4 million Gazans? Guess what, that is
    going to create conflict regardless of anything else.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)