• Can You Pass A Law To Overturn Facts?

    From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jan 29 03:47:00 2024
    You may have heard of the “Rwanda Safety Bill” that Rishi Sunak’s Government is currently trying to push through the UK Parliament.

    The Court previously rejected their attempt to send unwanted illegal
    immigrants to Rwanda, saying that it wasn’t a safe place for such
    vulnerable people.

    So to get around this judgement, now the UK Government is passing a law declaring that, contrary to the facts, Rwanda *is* in fact a safe place
    for sending these illegal immigrants.

    Has such a thing ever been tried here? Would it even pass?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Willy Nilly@21:1/5 to Lawrence D'Oliveiro on Mon Jan 29 05:07:23 2024
    On Mon, 29 Jan 2024, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
    So to get around this judgement, now the UK Government is passing a law >declaring that, contrary to the facts, Rwanda *is* in fact a safe place
    for sending these illegal immigrants.

    We need a long-term power outage just so that clowns like you will
    revise your priorities accordingly. Mindless leftism like yours is a collateral damage of affluence, some hardship will wake you up.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to Willy Nilly on Mon Jan 29 05:08:38 2024
    On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 05:07:23 GMT, Willy Nilly wrote:

    Mindless leftism like yours ...

    And there, people, is more evidence that the antiliberals believe that
    reality itself is part of the leftist conspiracy against them.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BR@21:1/5 to ldo@nz.invalid on Tue Jan 30 04:56:56 2024
    On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 03:47:00 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
    <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

    You may have heard of the Rwanda Safety Bill that Rishi Sunaks
    Government is currently trying to push through the UK Parliament.

    The Court previously rejected their attempt to send unwanted illegal >immigrants to Rwanda, saying that it wasnt a safe place for such
    vulnerable people.

    All illegal immigrants are unwanted.

    Entering a country illegally is a crime.

    Illegal aliens are owed nothing and should be deported.

    Bill.

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
    https://www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mutley@21:1/5 to blah@blah.blah on Tue Jan 30 09:02:54 2024
    BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 03:47:00 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro ><ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

    You may have heard of the Rwanda Safety Bill that Rishi Sunaks >>Government is currently trying to push through the UK Parliament.

    The Court previously rejected their attempt to send unwanted illegal >>immigrants to Rwanda, saying that it wasnt a safe place for such >>vulnerable people.

    All illegal immigrants are unwanted.

    Entering a country illegally is a crime.

    Illegal aliens are owed nothing and should be deported.

    Bill.

    I seem to remember a guy called Idi Amin solved the problem by
    throwing out non Ugandans. He got away with it. The Poms should be
    able to do the same.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jan 30 11:32:39 2024
    On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 09:02:54 +1300, Mutley <mutley2000@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 03:47:00 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro >><ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

    You may have heard of the Rwanda Safety Bill that Rishi Sunaks >>>Government is currently trying to push through the UK Parliament.

    The Court previously rejected their attempt to send unwanted illegal >>>immigrants to Rwanda, saying that it wasnt a safe place for such >>>vulnerable people.

    All illegal immigrants are unwanted.

    Entering a country illegally is a crime.

    Illegal aliens are owed nothing and should be deported.

    Bill.

    I seem to remember a guy called Idi Amin solved the problem by
    throwing out non Ugandans. He got away with it. The Poms should be
    able to do the same.

    Thankfully it is a problem that New Zealand's physical distance from
    other countries makes it not a problem that we have experience of. We
    have however seen an Australian solution - see: https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/apr/08/manus-island-and-nauru-previously-unseen-testimony-and-ai-imagery-reveal-unimaginable-part-of-australian-history
    and
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manus_Regional_Processing_Centre
    and https://amnesty.org.nz/manus-island-australia-abandons-refugees-life-uncertainty-and-peril

    Given the cost, I doubt that even this government would try and repeat
    such a "solution", but I am surprised that a cheaper option has not
    been suggested based on unfortunate firearm accidents, or a boat being
    sadly lost after departing New Zealand with rejected illegal
    immigrants on board . . .

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Tue Jan 30 00:12:34 2024
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 09:02:54 +1300, Mutley <mutley2000@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 03:47:00 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro >>><ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

    You may have heard of the Rwanda Safety Bill that Rishi Sunaks >>>>Government is currently trying to push through the UK Parliament.

    The Court previously rejected their attempt to send unwanted illegal >>>>immigrants to Rwanda, saying that it wasnt a safe place for such >>>>vulnerable people.

    All illegal immigrants are unwanted.

    Entering a country illegally is a crime.

    Illegal aliens are owed nothing and should be deported.

    Bill.

    I seem to remember a guy called Idi Amin solved the problem by
    throwing out non Ugandans. He got away with it. The Poms should be
    able to do the same.

    Thankfully it is a problem that New Zealand's physical distance from
    other countries makes it not a problem that we have experience of. We
    have however seen an Australian solution - see: >https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/apr/08/manus-island-and-nauru-previously-unseen-testimony-and-ai-imagery-reveal-unimaginable-part-of-australian-history
    and
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manus_Regional_Processing_Centre
    and >https://amnesty.org.nz/manus-island-australia-abandons-refugees-life-uncertainty-and-peril

    Given the cost, I doubt that even this government would try and repeat
    such a "solution", but I am surprised that a cheaper option has not
    been suggested based on unfortunate firearm accidents, or a boat being
    sadly lost after departing New Zealand with rejected illegal
    immigrants on board . . .
    Is that your preferred solution then? If so was that part of the last goverment's plans or are you looking forwards to the next Marxist government here?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jan 30 00:05:05 2024
    On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 04:56:56 +1300, BR wrote:

    All illegal immigrants are unwanted.

    Entering a country illegally is a crime.

    Illegal aliens are owed nothing and should be deported.

    Fine. If your position is “so Rwanda is a dangerous place, fuck the
    refugees, they don’t deserve to be treated as human beings”, just come out and say so. Don’t try to pretend that “Rwanda is a perfectly safe place, we’re honestly doing the best we can for them, they’ll be fine, pinky- swear”. And don’t try to pass a law saying no judge is allowed to take issue with that.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to Mutley on Mon Jan 29 23:38:56 2024
    On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 09:02:54 +1300, Mutley wrote:

    I seem to remember a guy called Idi Amin solved the problem by throwing
    out non Ugandans. He got away with it. The Poms should be able to do
    the same.

    “The way a government treats refugees is very instructive because it shows you how they would treat the rest of us if they thought they could get
    away with it.”
    -- Tony Benn

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to lizandtony@orcon.net.nz on Tue Jan 30 15:29:48 2024
    On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 00:12:34 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 09:02:54 +1300, Mutley <mutley2000@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 03:47:00 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro >>>><ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

    You may have heard of the Rwanda Safety Bill that Rishi Sunaks >>>>>Government is currently trying to push through the UK Parliament.

    The Court previously rejected their attempt to send unwanted illegal >>>>>immigrants to Rwanda, saying that it wasnt a safe place for such >>>>>vulnerable people.

    All illegal immigrants are unwanted.

    Entering a country illegally is a crime.

    Illegal aliens are owed nothing and should be deported.

    Bill.

    I seem to remember a guy called Idi Amin solved the problem by
    throwing out non Ugandans. He got away with it. The Poms should be >>>able to do the same.

    Thankfully it is a problem that New Zealand's physical distance from
    other countries makes it not a problem that we have experience of. We
    have however seen an Australian solution - see: >>https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/apr/08/manus-island-and-nauru-previously-unseen-testimony-and-ai-imagery-reveal-unimaginable-part-of-australian-history
    and
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manus_Regional_Processing_Centre
    and >>https://amnesty.org.nz/manus-island-australia-abandons-refugees-life-uncertainty-and-peril

    Given the cost, I doubt that even this government would try and repeat
    such a "solution", but I am surprised that a cheaper option has not
    been suggested based on unfortunate firearm accidents, or a boat being >>sadly lost after departing New Zealand with rejected illegal
    immigrants on board . . .
    Is that your preferred solution then? If so was that part of the last >goverment's plans or are you looking forwards to the next Marxist government >here?

    Whoosh . . . right over your head, "Right", Tony? It may have missed
    but did you notice that Rishi Sunak's government is a right wing
    government; and the Australian Governments that treated illegal
    immigrants so dreadfully, both on humanitarian terms and in terms of
    cost to that country, was a government of the Right. Nothing negative
    about governments of the left in the whole story until you decided to
    blame the innocent . . . I suspect you tried not to see that Jacinda
    Ardern attempted to relieve some of the suffering by indicating that
    New Zealand would take some of the people treated so badly by
    Australia.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Tue Jan 30 03:26:20 2024
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 00:12:34 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 09:02:54 +1300, Mutley <mutley2000@hotmail.com> >>>wrote:

    BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 03:47:00 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro >>>>><ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

    You may have heard of the Rwanda Safety Bill that Rishi Sunaks >>>>>>Government is currently trying to push through the UK Parliament.

    The Court previously rejected their attempt to send unwanted illegal >>>>>>immigrants to Rwanda, saying that it wasnt a safe place for such >>>>>>vulnerable people.

    All illegal immigrants are unwanted.

    Entering a country illegally is a crime.

    Illegal aliens are owed nothing and should be deported.

    Bill.

    I seem to remember a guy called Idi Amin solved the problem by >>>>throwing out non Ugandans. He got away with it. The Poms should be >>>>able to do the same.

    Thankfully it is a problem that New Zealand's physical distance from >>>other countries makes it not a problem that we have experience of. We >>>have however seen an Australian solution - see: >>>https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/apr/08/manus-island-and-nauru-previously-unseen-testimony-and-ai-imagery-reveal-unimaginable-part-of-australian-history
    and
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manus_Regional_Processing_Centre
    and >>>https://amnesty.org.nz/manus-island-australia-abandons-refugees-life-uncertainty-and-peril

    Given the cost, I doubt that even this government would try and repeat >>>such a "solution", but I am surprised that a cheaper option has not
    been suggested based on unfortunate firearm accidents, or a boat being >>>sadly lost after departing New Zealand with rejected illegal
    immigrants on board . . .
    Is that your preferred solution then? If so was that part of the last >>goverment's plans or are you looking forwards to the next Marxist government >>here?

    Removed stupid political rhetotic.
    Clearly Rich prefers to kill immigrants.
    Shame on him.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to lizandtony@orcon.net.nz on Tue Jan 30 17:48:51 2024
    On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 03:26:20 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 00:12:34 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 09:02:54 +1300, Mutley <mutley2000@hotmail.com> >>>>wrote:

    BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 03:47:00 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro >>>>>><ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

    You may have heard of the Rwanda Safety Bill that Rishi Sunaks >>>>>>>Government is currently trying to push through the UK Parliament. >>>>>>>
    The Court previously rejected their attempt to send unwanted illegal >>>>>>>immigrants to Rwanda, saying that it wasnt a safe place for such >>>>>>>vulnerable people.

    All illegal immigrants are unwanted.

    Entering a country illegally is a crime.

    Illegal aliens are owed nothing and should be deported.

    Bill.

    I seem to remember a guy called Idi Amin solved the problem by >>>>>throwing out non Ugandans. He got away with it. The Poms should be >>>>>able to do the same.

    Thankfully it is a problem that New Zealand's physical distance from >>>>other countries makes it not a problem that we have experience of. We >>>>have however seen an Australian solution - see: >>>>https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/apr/08/manus-island-and-nauru-previously-unseen-testimony-and-ai-imagery-reveal-unimaginable-part-of-australian-history
    and
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manus_Regional_Processing_Centre
    and >>>>https://amnesty.org.nz/manus-island-australia-abandons-refugees-life-uncertainty-and-peril

    Given the cost, I doubt that even this government would try and repeat >>>>such a "solution", but I am surprised that a cheaper option has not >>>>been suggested based on unfortunate firearm accidents, or a boat being >>>>sadly lost after departing New Zealand with rejected illegal
    immigrants on board . . .
    Is that your preferred solution then? If so was that part of the last >>>goverment's plans or are you looking forwards to the next Marxist government >>>here?

    Removed stupid political rhetotic.
    Clearly Rich prefers to kill immigrants.
    Shame on him.

    Whoosh . . . right over your head, "Right", Tony? It may have missed
    but did you notice that Rishi Sunak's government is a right wing
    government; and the Australian Governments that treated illegal
    immigrants so dreadfully, both on humanitarian terms and in terms of
    cost to that country, was a government of the Right. Nothing negative
    about governments of the left in the whole story until you decided to
    blame the innocent . . . I suspect you tried not to see that Jacinda
    Ardern attempted to relieve some of the suffering by indicating that
    New Zealand would take some of the people treated so badly by
    Australia.

    So now you believe you can avoid facts by deleting them from posts,
    Tony. I do feel sorry for you; I raised concerns over the UK right
    wing government's actions, and showed that the UK government contempt
    for the safety of caught attempting to become illegal immigrants is a consistent attitude from the left - with examples of deaths from
    Australia sending such people to a place that, while not Rwanda, was
    such that quite a few died before Australia had to act even slightly
    humanely. An escalation to using blunt force to get rid of a problem
    is typical of the escalation of hitting out that is typical of the
    far-right; I contrasted that sort of lack of humanity with the
    response from the then NZ government of offering to give some of those
    sent to Manu Island by Australia admission to New Zealand - clearly I,
    and that government, believe we should help people rather than harm
    them.

    And the response from Tiny? - a bare-faced lie - no Tony I have not
    advocated immigrants, illegal or otherwise - we have enough of that
    from Australia and now possibly the UK.

    And deleting parts of posts that you cannot respond to says more about
    you than anyone else, Tony.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Tue Jan 30 06:02:16 2024
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 03:26:20 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 00:12:34 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 09:02:54 +1300, Mutley <mutley2000@hotmail.com> >>>>>wrote:

    BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 03:47:00 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro >>>>>>><ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

    You may have heard of the Rwanda Safety Bill that Rishi Sunaks >>>>>>>>Government is currently trying to push through the UK Parliament. >>>>>>>>
    The Court previously rejected their attempt to send unwanted illegal >>>>>>>>immigrants to Rwanda, saying that it wasnt a safe place for such >>>>>>>>vulnerable people.

    All illegal immigrants are unwanted.

    Entering a country illegally is a crime.

    Illegal aliens are owed nothing and should be deported.

    Bill.

    I seem to remember a guy called Idi Amin solved the problem by >>>>>>throwing out non Ugandans. He got away with it. The Poms should be >>>>>>able to do the same.

    Thankfully it is a problem that New Zealand's physical distance from >>>>>other countries makes it not a problem that we have experience of. We >>>>>have however seen an Australian solution - see: >>>>>https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/apr/08/manus-island-and-nauru-previously-unseen-testimony-and-ai-imagery-reveal-unimaginable-part-of-australian-history
    and
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manus_Regional_Processing_Centre
    and >>>>>https://amnesty.org.nz/manus-island-australia-abandons-refugees-life-uncertainty-and-peril

    Given the cost, I doubt that even this government would try and repeat >>>>>such a "solution", but I am surprised that a cheaper option has not >>>>>been suggested based on unfortunate firearm accidents, or a boat being >>>>>sadly lost after departing New Zealand with rejected illegal >>>>>immigrants on board . . .
    Is that your preferred solution then? If so was that part of the last >>>>goverment's plans or are you looking forwards to the next Marxist >>>>government
    here?

    Removed stupid political rhetotic.
    Clearly Rich prefers to kill immigrants.
    Shame on him.


    So now you believe you can avoid facts by deleting them from posts,
    Tony.
    No not at all - you simply do not understand why I do that, and you never will. But it works.
    there wer no facts in your diatribe, just nastiness.
    I do feel sorry for you; I raised concerns over the UK right
    wing government's actions, and showed that the UK government contempt
    for the safety of caught attempting to become illegal immigrants is a >consistent attitude from the left - with examples of deaths from
    Australia sending such people to a place that, while not Rwanda, was
    such that quite a few died before Australia had to act even slightly >humanely. An escalation to using blunt force to get rid of a problem
    is typical of the escalation of hitting out that is typical of the
    far-right; I contrasted that sort of lack of humanity with the
    response from the then NZ government of offering to give some of those
    sent to Manu Island by Australia admission to New Zealand - clearly I,
    and that government, believe we should help people rather than harm
    them.

    I have not advocated immigrants, illegal or otherwise
    You advocated drowning them.
    - we have enough of that
    from Australia and now possibly the UK.
    Well that is what you said - you seem to believe it is appropriate to drown them - why do you say such appalling things?

    Nonsense gone for now.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BR@21:1/5 to ldo@nz.invalid on Wed Jan 31 17:54:36 2024
    On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 00:05:05 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
    <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

    On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 04:56:56 +1300, BR wrote:

    All illegal immigrants are unwanted.

    Entering a country illegally is a crime.

    Illegal aliens are owed nothing and should be deported.

    Fine. If your position is so Rwanda is a dangerous place, fuck the
    refugees, they dont deserve to be treated as human beings,

    How does anybody get to deserve anything? Is Rawanda a dangerous place
    or not, and who gets to decide? Some court?

    just come out and say so.

    Illegal aliens have no business being in Britain.

    Would you want them in your house freeloading off you? No? Then don't
    give me all the fake compassion and emotional blackmail.

    Dont try to pretend that Rwanda is a perfectly safe place,

    Nowhere is a perfectly safe place. The UK is a hell of a lot less safe
    since it allowed high levels of immigration from 3rd world countries.
    Enoch Powell was right. You seem to believe illegal aliens should be
    tolerated.

    were honestly doing the best we can for them, theyll be fine, pinky- >swear.

    The people of the UK owe them nothing. They are illegally in the
    country. Let those who want them to stay volunteer to put them up in
    their own houses and pay their expenses.

    And dont try to pass a law saying no judge is allowed to take
    issue with that.

    Who are these illegal "refugees"? Has anyone bothered to find out? Is
    it even possible to do background checks on to try to discern what
    their real intentions might be?

    Either they are in the country legally or illegally. If they are in
    the country illegally they should be deported. Simple as that.

    The UK is a welfare state. Milton Friedman was right when he said you
    can have a welfare state or you can have open borders, but you can't
    have both.

    The UK government's ONLY duty is to the UK citizens who they were
    elected to represent and who pay their salaries. The only thing
    illegal aliens are entitled to get is out.

    Bill.

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
    https://www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to All on Wed Feb 7 02:38:29 2024
    On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 17:54:36 +1300, BR wrote:

    On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 00:05:05 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

    On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 04:56:56 +1300, BR wrote:

    All illegal immigrants are unwanted.

    Entering a country illegally is a crime.

    Illegal aliens are owed nothing and should be deported.

    Fine. If your position is “so Rwanda is a dangerous place, fuck the
    refugees, they don’t deserve to be treated as human beings”, just come >> out and say so. Don’t try to pretend that “Rwanda is a perfectly safe
    place, we’re honestly doing the best we can for them, they’ll be fine, >> pinky- swear”. And don’t try to pass a law saying no judge is allowed
    to take issue with that.

    How does anybody get to deserve anything? Is Rawanda a dangerous place
    or not, and who gets to decide? Some court?

    That is their job, yes, and based on the facts put before them, they have
    so decided.

    Can you make up “alternative facts”, just because you want them to decide something different?

    Illegal aliens have no business being in Britain.

    Would you want them in your house freeloading off you?

    Give them a job, so they can work for an income, then they would no longer
    be “freeloading”, would they? And they can pay taxes on that income, and help reduce the tax burden on fine, upstanding citizens like yourself. Who would not want that? Because I’m sure even your tax generosity has limits.

    Nowhere is a perfectly safe place.

    Do you know what a “strawman” is?

    The UK government's ONLY duty is to the UK citizens who they were
    elected to represent and who pay their salaries.

    Note that it isn’t only citizens who pay taxes. Others are contributing to their salaries, too.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BR@21:1/5 to ldo@nz.invalid on Thu Feb 8 21:10:27 2024
    On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 02:38:29 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
    <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

    On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 17:54:36 +1300, BR wrote:

    On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 00:05:05 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
    <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

    On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 04:56:56 +1300, BR wrote:

    All illegal immigrants are unwanted.

    Entering a country illegally is a crime.

    Illegal aliens are owed nothing and should be deported.

    Fine. If your position is so Rwanda is a dangerous place, fuck the
    refugees, they dont deserve to be treated as human beings, just come
    out and say so. Dont try to pretend that Rwanda is a perfectly safe
    place, were honestly doing the best we can for them, theyll be fine,
    pinky- swear. And dont try to pass a law saying no judge is allowed
    to take issue with that.

    How does anybody get to deserve anything? Is Rawanda a dangerous place
    or not, and who gets to decide? Some court?

    That is their job, yes, and based on the facts put before them, they have
    so decided.

    Can you make up alternative facts, just because you want them to decide >something different?

    Why the hell are the courts even involved in all this politics? If
    someone has committed a crime, the court's job is to determine their
    innocence or guilt. Illegal aliens are guilty of breaking the law just
    by being in the country; bang to rights. Sheriff Joe Arpaio had the
    right idea. Put them in a cage in pink underpants for six months then
    launch them back across the border.

    Illegal aliens have no business being in Britain.

    Would you want them in your house freeloading off you?

    Give them a job, so they can work for an income, then they would no longer
    be freeloading, would they?

    How about you give them a job? If you are not even prepared to
    billet some of them at your own house and at your own expense, you are
    a hypocrite.

    Maybe there should be no border controls at all. Anyone can enter
    enter the UK or any other democratic country with no restrictions or conditions. Would you vote for that?

    And they can pay taxes on that income, and
    help reduce the tax burden on fine, upstanding citizens like yourself. Who >would not want that? Because Im sure even your tax generosity has limits.

    You are living in a dream world. How much demand do you think there is
    for people with no skills and who don't speak English?

    Nowhere is a perfectly safe place.

    Do you know what a strawman is?

    The UK government's ONLY duty is to the UK citizens who they were
    elected to represent and who pay their salaries.

    Note that it isnt only citizens who pay taxes. Others are contributing to >their salaries, too.

    You won't get any argument from me about that. Bribery I call it. Some politicians take kickbacks from special interest groups, including
    people who wish to see the demise of the West. Flooding a country with
    hostile illegal aliens is one of many ways that the destruction of the
    Western alliance can be hastened. It would appear that you are in
    fullsupport of this.

    Bill.

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
    https://www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to blah@blah.blah on Thu Feb 8 21:43:01 2024
    On Thu, 08 Feb 2024 21:10:27 +1300, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 02:38:29 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
    <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

    On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 17:54:36 +1300, BR wrote:

    On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 00:05:05 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
    <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

    On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 04:56:56 +1300, BR wrote:

    All illegal immigrants are unwanted.

    Entering a country illegally is a crime.

    Illegal aliens are owed nothing and should be deported.

    Fine. If your position is so Rwanda is a dangerous place, fuck the
    refugees, they dont deserve to be treated as human beings, just come >>>> out and say so. Dont try to pretend that Rwanda is a perfectly safe
    place, were honestly doing the best we can for them, theyll be fine, >>>> pinky- swear. And dont try to pass a law saying no judge is allowed
    to take issue with that.

    How does anybody get to deserve anything? Is Rawanda a dangerous place
    or not, and who gets to decide? Some court?

    That is their job, yes, and based on the facts put before them, they have >>so decided.

    Can you make up alternative facts, just because you want them to decide >>something different?

    Why the hell are the courts even involved in all this politics? If
    someone has committed a crime, the court's job is to determine their >innocence or guilt. Illegal aliens are guilty of breaking the law just
    by being in the country; bang to rights. Sheriff Joe Arpaio had the
    right idea. Put them in a cage in pink underpants for six months then
    launch them back across the border.

    Illegal aliens have no business being in Britain.

    Would you want them in your house freeloading off you?

    Give them a job, so they can work for an income, then they would no longer >>be freeloading, would they?

    How about you give them a job? If you are not even prepared to
    billet some of them at your own house and at your own expense, you are
    a hypocrite.

    Maybe there should be no border controls at all. Anyone can enter
    enter the UK or any other democratic country with no restrictions or >conditions. Would you vote for that?

    And they can pay taxes on that income, and
    help reduce the tax burden on fine, upstanding citizens like yourself. Who >>would not want that? Because Im sure even your tax generosity has limits.

    You are living in a dream world. How much demand do you think there is
    for people with no skills and who don't speak English?

    Nowhere is a perfectly safe place.

    Do you know what a strawman is?

    The UK government's ONLY duty is to the UK citizens who they were
    elected to represent and who pay their salaries.

    Note that it isnt only citizens who pay taxes. Others are contributing to >>their salaries, too.

    You won't get any argument from me about that. Bribery I call it. Some >politicians take kickbacks from special interest groups, including
    people who wish to see the demise of the West. Flooding a country with >hostile illegal aliens is one of many ways that the destruction of the >Western alliance can be hastened. It would appear that you are in
    fullsupport of this.

    Bill.

    The police and the courts need to obey all relevant law, and that
    covers what they do when illegal immigrants are discovered, what
    processes decide on actions then taken, and whether those actions are themselves legal and comply with commitments under international
    agreements.

    I doubt if the UK were sending illegal immigrants to Rwanda with the
    aim of hastening he destruction of the Western alliance - their
    conservative government just want the problem to go away; a bit like
    when Australia sent illegal immigrants to places like Manus Island . .
    .

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BR@21:1/5 to All on Sun Feb 11 07:19:35 2024
    On Thu, 08 Feb 2024 21:43:01 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Thu, 08 Feb 2024 21:10:27 +1300, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 02:38:29 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro >><ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

    On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 17:54:36 +1300, BR wrote:

    On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 00:05:05 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
    <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

    On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 04:56:56 +1300, BR wrote:

    All illegal immigrants are unwanted.

    Entering a country illegally is a crime.

    Illegal aliens are owed nothing and should be deported.

    Fine. If your position is so Rwanda is a dangerous place, fuck the
    refugees, they dont deserve to be treated as human beings, just come >>>>> out and say so. Dont try to pretend that Rwanda is a perfectly safe >>>>> place, were honestly doing the best we can for them, theyll be fine, >>>>> pinky- swear. And dont try to pass a law saying no judge is allowed >>>>> to take issue with that.

    How does anybody get to deserve anything? Is Rawanda a dangerous place >>>> or not, and who gets to decide? Some court?

    That is their job, yes, and based on the facts put before them, they have >>>so decided.

    Can you make up alternative facts, just because you want them to decide >>>something different?

    Why the hell are the courts even involved in all this politics? If
    someone has committed a crime, the court's job is to determine their >>innocence or guilt. Illegal aliens are guilty of breaking the law just
    by being in the country; bang to rights. Sheriff Joe Arpaio had the
    right idea. Put them in a cage in pink underpants for six months then >>launch them back across the border.

    Illegal aliens have no business being in Britain.

    Would you want them in your house freeloading off you?

    Give them a job, so they can work for an income, then they would no longer >>>be freeloading, would they?

    How about you give them a job? If you are not even prepared to
    billet some of them at your own house and at your own expense, you are
    a hypocrite.

    Maybe there should be no border controls at all. Anyone can enter
    enter the UK or any other democratic country with no restrictions or >>conditions. Would you vote for that?

    And they can pay taxes on that income, and
    help reduce the tax burden on fine, upstanding citizens like yourself. Who >>>would not want that? Because Im sure even your tax generosity has limits. >>
    You are living in a dream world. How much demand do you think there is
    for people with no skills and who don't speak English?

    Nowhere is a perfectly safe place.

    Do you know what a strawman is?

    The UK government's ONLY duty is to the UK citizens who they were
    elected to represent and who pay their salaries.

    Note that it isnt only citizens who pay taxes. Others are contributing to >>>their salaries, too.

    You won't get any argument from me about that. Bribery I call it. Some >>politicians take kickbacks from special interest groups, including
    people who wish to see the demise of the West. Flooding a country with >>hostile illegal aliens is one of many ways that the destruction of the >>Western alliance can be hastened. It would appear that you are in >>fullsupport of this.

    Bill.

    The police and the courts need to obey all relevant law, and that
    covers what they do when illegal immigrants are discovered, what
    processes decide on actions then taken, and whether those actions are >themselves legal and comply with commitments under international
    agreements.

    What you are saying is that the police and the courts need to obey the
    law, but illegal aliens don't.

    International agreements should not take presidence over a country's
    laws, otherwise one one parliament can bind another by signing up to
    some international agreement that may not be in the country's best
    interests.

    I doubt if the UK were sending illegal immigrants to Rwanda with the
    aim of hastening he destruction of the Western alliance

    Go back and read again what was written. Slowly this time.

    - their
    conservative government just want the problem to go away; a bit like
    when Australia sent illegal immigrants to places like Manus Island . .

    It's easy. Deport them back to where they came from. An example needs
    to be made of these criminals. No country's taxpayers owe them
    anything.

    Bill.

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
    https://www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)