On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 04:59:13 +1300, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:I did not post that you incredible idiot. BR posted it not me - go and see a geriatrician. Or better still a taxiderist and get yourself stuffed.
On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 18:38:42 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>wrote:
For once you got something "right"! I don't believe there was really >>>much terror on either side - that is why I referred to "similarly >>>terrified"
Try telling that to the 71 year old lady who was punched in the face >>several times by a young male "pride" protester.
Bill.
The thread got diverted shortly after that; selective deleting can
make it difficult to remember context and who had said what - see the
extract below; you would have to look back for all the attributions:
The mob that terrified her was real, the other mob is your fantasy (for >>fantasyNot true, a lie with no evidence, but even if it was you have agreed that >>>>sheOn 25 Jan 2024 00:27:12 GMT, Gordon wrote:I watched the footage, she was terrified by an angry mob.
(the short woman from the UK who was shut down from speaking)
Nobody shut her down. First she went all bombastic, daring the minister >>>>>>>to
bar her from entry. Then when she was allowed in, she got cold feet and >>>>>>>immediately ran away again.
It beats me why people dislike her, she is and was not anti trans >>>>>>(whatever
that means) she was and is simply pro women. Not a hard distinction to >>>>>>understand.
And those protesting against what she was saying were similarly >>>>>terrified by the angry mob of her supporters . . .
was terrified by a mob. Therefore my comment is correct.
For once you got something "right"! I don't believe there was really >>>much terror on either side - that is why I referred to "similarly >>>terrified"
Well done Tony!
read deliberate distortion of the facts).
Of course I was right and finally you agreed.
Oh dear, now you are changing your story and getting it wrong - again!
Now you have referred to a lady punched in the face - from what I
understand she was not the only one, but the fighting was closed down
fairly quickly; I was not aware of serious injuries, but there were
reports of a possibly deliberate attempt by "religious bikies" to
intimidate a group of ladies by not giving way when they stepped on a >pedestrian crossing. So I agree there was some physical interaction;
but I was not aware of any that had to be treated for injuries or
taken to hospital - you may have further information; it was certainly
not a pleasant and peaceful gathering, but now was it seriously
violent on either side.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Well? BR really did post it you imbecile - are you man or jellyfish (I think I know which).
On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 04:59:13 +1300, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:I did not post that you incredible idiot. BR posted it not me - go and see a >geriatrician. Or better still a taxiderist and get yourself stuffed.
On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 18:38:42 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>wrote:
For once you got something "right"! I don't believe there was really >>>>much terror on either side - that is why I referred to "similarly >>>>terrified"
Try telling that to the 71 year old lady who was punched in the face >>>several times by a young male "pride" protester.
Bill.
The thread got diverted shortly after that; selective deleting can
make it difficult to remember context and who had said what - see the >>extract below; you would have to look back for all the attributions:
The mob that terrified her was real, the other mob is your fantasy (for >>>fantasyNot true, a lie with no evidence, but even if it was you have agreed that >>>>>sheOn 25 Jan 2024 00:27:12 GMT, Gordon wrote:I watched the footage, she was terrified by an angry mob.
(the short woman from the UK who was shut down from speaking) >>>>>>>>Nobody shut her down. First she went all bombastic, daring the minister >>>>>>>>to
bar her from entry. Then when she was allowed in, she got cold feet and >>>>>>>>immediately ran away again.
It beats me why people dislike her, she is and was not anti trans >>>>>>>(whatever
that means) she was and is simply pro women. Not a hard distinction to >>>>>>>understand.
And those protesting against what she was saying were similarly >>>>>>terrified by the angry mob of her supporters . . .
was terrified by a mob. Therefore my comment is correct.
For once you got something "right"! I don't believe there was really >>>>much terror on either side - that is why I referred to "similarly >>>>terrified"
Well done Tony!
read deliberate distortion of the facts).
Of course I was right and finally you agreed.
Oh dear, now you are changing your story and getting it wrong - again!
Now you have referred to a lady punched in the face - from what I >>understand she was not the only one, but the fighting was closed down >>fairly quickly; I was not aware of serious injuries, but there were
reports of a possibly deliberate attempt by "religious bikies" to >>intimidate a group of ladies by not giving way when they stepped on a >>pedestrian crossing. So I agree there was some physical interaction;
but I was not aware of any that had to be treated for injuries or
taken to hospital - you may have further information; it was certainly
not a pleasant and peaceful gathering, but now was it seriously
violent on either side.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 126:00:39 |
| Calls: | 6,663 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 12,212 |
| Messages: | 5,334,951 |