Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:

On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 18:48:55 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 05:40:05 -0000 (UTC), Tony wrote:

Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 04:53:51 -0000 (UTC), Tony wrote:

Not worth the cost, all those idiotic vetoes and even if there were no >>>>>>> vetoes -
no teeth. A Total waste of money and time.

Guess who are the biggest offenders in ignoring Security Council >>>>>>resolutions?

No thanks, it is irrelevant and entirely off the subject of the thread. >>>>

Why did you bring it up, then? Suddenly want to backpedal, do you?

I didn't bring up the security council, you did. Please check back.

The Security Council was raised by the poster that said:
"Not worth the cost, all those idiotic vetoes and even if there were
no vetoes - no teeth. A Total waste of money and time."

Gee you are stupid - it was raised by the OP (as I said) here is the quote >"It’s “air of legitimacy” that they are after. This should have gone >through the UN Security Council. Like the Iraq War, it didn’t. And like
the Iraq War, we should stay out of it for that reason."
This was on Wed, 24 Jan 2024 00:51:09 -0000 (UTC)

If you take your own advice to look back you would see that the poster
was you, Tony.

You should apologise you prize prick - it was not me, Do you have any >standards
of behaviour at all - or are you simply dumb?

Admit your culpability for the first time.
You either lied or you guessed or you are dumb as a brick.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)