• But wait there is more allegations

    From Gordon@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jan 15 06:40:51 2024
    https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/133561585/police-investigating-golriz-ghahraman-allegation--this-time-in-wellington

    This one was in October and in Wellington. So an earlier time and a
    different place. However you dice it, it does not look good. Time to throw
    away the shovel and stop digging.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to Gordon on Mon Jan 15 22:22:10 2024
    On 15 Jan 2024 06:40:51 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/133561585/police-investigating-golriz-ghahraman-allegation--this-time-in-wellington

    This one was in October and in Wellington. So an earlier time and a
    different place. However you dice it, it does not look good. Time to throw >away the shovel and stop digging.
    Absolutely - we have Police so we don't have to do our own digging!
    Mostly what has been dug up is opinion, political spin and ignorance -
    TV One even had the gall to seek advice from Bridget Morton - who
    dutifully parroted the 'dirty tricks' line from Kiwiblog etc. But then
    National and their spin doctors don;t want the police to get through
    this case too quickly - rumour and innuendo are much more exciting!

    Morton had the gall to suggest that she should be stood down from her
    positions with the Green Party - who had already done that days ago!

    So by all means enjoy the speculation but let us remember that old
    principle that used to be followed by New Zealand - innocent until
    proven guilty - and National need to be careful about throwing too
    many stones - one of theirs may be next . . .

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Crash@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jan 16 08:06:57 2024
    On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 22:22:10 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 15 Jan 2024 06:40:51 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/133561585/police-investigating-golriz-ghahraman-allegation--this-time-in-wellington

    This one was in October and in Wellington. So an earlier time and a >>different place. However you dice it, it does not look good. Time to throw >>away the shovel and stop digging.
    Absolutely - we have Police so we don't have to do our own digging!
    Mostly what has been dug up is opinion, political spin and ignorance -
    TV One even had the gall to seek advice from Bridget Morton - who
    dutifully parroted the 'dirty tricks' line from Kiwiblog etc. But then >National and their spin doctors don;t want the police to get through
    this case too quickly - rumour and innuendo are much more exciting!

    Morton had the gall to suggest that she should be stood down from her >positions with the Green Party - who had already done that days ago!

    So by all means enjoy the speculation but let us remember that old
    principle that used to be followed by New Zealand - innocent until
    proven guilty - and National need to be careful about throwing too
    many stones - one of theirs may be next . . .

    Rich whatever political spin you push on this, the fact is that retail businesses have made allegations of criminal conduct against Gharamen.
    No amount of repeating your references to 'dirty tricks' and National
    changes this.

    The subject is what Gharamen is alleged to have done. All else is
    irrelevant.


    --
    Crash McBash

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Mon Jan 15 19:15:46 2024
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 15 Jan 2024 06:40:51 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/133561585/police-investigating-golriz-ghahraman-allegation--this-time-in-wellington

    This one was in October and in Wellington. So an earlier time and a >>different place. However you dice it, it does not look good. Time to throw >>away the shovel and stop digging.
    Absolutely - we have Police so we don't have to do our own digging!
    Mostly what has been dug up is opinion, political spin and ignorance -
    TV One even had the gall to seek advice from Bridget Morton - who
    dutifully parroted the 'dirty tricks' line from Kiwiblog etc. But then >National and their spin doctors don;t want the police to get through
    this case too quickly - rumour and innuendo are much more exciting!

    Morton had the gall to suggest that she should be stood down from her >positions with the Green Party - who had already done that days ago!

    So by all means enjoy the speculation but let us remember that old
    principle that used to be followed by New Zealand - innocent until
    proven guilty - and National need to be careful about throwing too
    many stones - one of theirs may be next . . .
    What a lot of political rubbish you do spin. Leave it alone you stupid man - transparent as ever.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jan 15 19:55:58 2024
    On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 22:22:10 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:

    So by all means enjoy the speculation but let us remember that old
    principle that used to be followed by New Zealand - innocent until
    proven guilty ...

    As a private citizen going about your private affairs, “innocent until
    proven guilty” is the norm.

    As a person in a position of special power over the rest of us, the onus
    is on you to prove yourself squeaky-clean.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to ldo@nz.invalid on Tue Jan 16 09:32:02 2024
    On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 19:55:58 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
    <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

    On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 22:22:10 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:

    So by all means enjoy the speculation but let us remember that old
    principle that used to be followed by New Zealand - innocent until
    proven guilty ...

    As a private citizen going about your private affairs, innocent until
    proven guilty is the norm.

    As a person in a position of special power over the rest of us, the onus
    is on you to prove yourself squeaky-clean.

    Exactly, and if charges are laid (and if the rumours are true that
    seems likely), then that will be fought out in court. As an opposition
    MP she has no special power over the rest of us, particularly as
    Parliament does not sit until 30 January.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to lizandtony@orcon.net.nz on Tue Jan 16 09:24:12 2024
    On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 19:15:46 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 15 Jan 2024 06:40:51 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
    https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/133561585/police-investigating-golriz-ghahraman-allegation--this-time-in-wellington

    This one was in October and in Wellington. So an earlier time and a >>>different place. However you dice it, it does not look good. Time to throw >>>away the shovel and stop digging.
    Absolutely - we have Police so we don't have to do our own digging!
    Mostly what has been dug up is opinion, political spin and ignorance -
    TV One even had the gall to seek advice from Bridget Morton - who
    dutifully parroted the 'dirty tricks' line from Kiwiblog etc. But then >>National and their spin doctors don;t want the police to get through
    this case too quickly - rumour and innuendo are much more exciting!

    Morton had the gall to suggest that she should be stood down from her >>positions with the Green Party - who had already done that days ago!

    So by all means enjoy the speculation but let us remember that old >>principle that used to be followed by New Zealand - innocent until
    proven guilty - and National need to be careful about throwing too
    many stones - one of theirs may be next . . .
    What a lot of political rubbish you do spin. Leave it alone you stupid man - >transparent as ever.

    And the Green Party is also being transparent - you just hate that,
    don't you Tony . . .

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jan 16 09:22:31 2024
    On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 08:06:57 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>
    wrote:

    On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 22:22:10 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 15 Jan 2024 06:40:51 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
    https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/133561585/police-investigating-golriz-ghahraman-allegation--this-time-in-wellington

    This one was in October and in Wellington. So an earlier time and a >>>different place. However you dice it, it does not look good. Time to throw >>>away the shovel and stop digging.
    Absolutely - we have Police so we don't have to do our own digging!
    Mostly what has been dug up is opinion, political spin and ignorance -
    TV One even had the gall to seek advice from Bridget Morton - who
    dutifully parroted the 'dirty tricks' line from Kiwiblog etc. But then >>National and their spin doctors don;t want the police to get through
    this case too quickly - rumour and innuendo are much more exciting!

    Morton had the gall to suggest that she should be stood down from her >>positions with the Green Party - who had already done that days ago!

    So by all means enjoy the speculation but let us remember that old >>principle that used to be followed by New Zealand - innocent until
    proven guilty - and National need to be careful about throwing too
    many stones - one of theirs may be next . . .

    Rich whatever political spin you push on this, the fact is that retail >businesses have made allegations of criminal conduct against Gharamen.
    No amount of repeating your references to 'dirty tricks' and National
    changes this.

    The subject is what Gharamen is alleged to have done. All else is >irrelevant.
    Exactly my point - mindless speculation about the allegations is a
    waste of everyone's time; it is notable that the police have said very
    little, but it is clear they are serious allegations that have not
    gone away. Speculation about what would happen if she is found guilty
    was fair, but it has been clarified that as she is a list MP the next
    person on the list would become a list MP. There is really nothing
    further that the Green Party can say, other than what they have, which essentially confirms that the allegations are serious and when they
    were told of them. She has lost her portfolio responsibilities within
    the party until this is resolved. As all else is irrelevant, there is
    little more to be said. What additional information was given by other
    parties when faced with allegations about an MP of similar serious
    nature? What is it that you would want any political party to say
    under these circumstances? Parliament does not sit again until 30
    January.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to johno1234@gmail.com on Mon Jan 15 23:48:16 2024
    JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday 16 January 2024 at 09:32:07 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 19:55:58 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
    <l...@nz.invalid> wrote:

    On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 22:22:10 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:

    So by all means enjoy the speculation but let us remember that old
    principle that used to be followed by New Zealand - innocent until
    proven guilty ...

    As a private citizen going about your private affairs, “innocent until
    proven guilty” is the norm.

    As a person in a position of special power over the rest of us, the onus
    is on you to prove yourself squeaky-clean.
    Exactly, and if charges are laid (and if the rumours are true that
    seems likely), then that will be fought out in court. As an opposition
    MP she has no special power over the rest of us, particularly as
    Parliament does not sit until 30 January.

    In the meantime Golly-G has apologised and resigned which tacitly acknowledges >that she did indeed pinch stuff.
    Blaming the pressures of the job for her actions - entirely predictable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Lawrence D'Oliveiro on Mon Jan 15 23:46:25 2024
    Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
    On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 22:22:10 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:

    So by all means enjoy the speculation but let us remember that old
    principle that used to be followed by New Zealand - innocent until
    proven guilty ...

    As a private citizen going about your private affairs, “innocent until >proven guilty” is the norm.

    As a person in a position of special power over the rest of us, the onus
    is on you to prove yourself squeaky-clean.
    I agree - Rich won't.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Crash@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jan 16 12:41:55 2024
    On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 09:22:31 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 08:06:57 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>
    wrote:

    On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 22:22:10 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>wrote:

    On 15 Jan 2024 06:40:51 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
    https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/133561585/police-investigating-golriz-ghahraman-allegation--this-time-in-wellington

    This one was in October and in Wellington. So an earlier time and a >>>>different place. However you dice it, it does not look good. Time to throw >>>>away the shovel and stop digging.
    Absolutely - we have Police so we don't have to do our own digging! >>>Mostly what has been dug up is opinion, political spin and ignorance -
    TV One even had the gall to seek advice from Bridget Morton - who >>>dutifully parroted the 'dirty tricks' line from Kiwiblog etc. But then >>>National and their spin doctors don;t want the police to get through
    this case too quickly - rumour and innuendo are much more exciting!

    Morton had the gall to suggest that she should be stood down from her >>>positions with the Green Party - who had already done that days ago!

    So by all means enjoy the speculation but let us remember that old >>>principle that used to be followed by New Zealand - innocent until
    proven guilty - and National need to be careful about throwing too
    many stones - one of theirs may be next . . .

    Rich whatever political spin you push on this, the fact is that retail >>businesses have made allegations of criminal conduct against Gharamen.
    No amount of repeating your references to 'dirty tricks' and National >>changes this.

    The subject is what Gharamen is alleged to have done. All else is >>irrelevant.
    Exactly my point - mindless speculation about the allegations is a
    waste of everyone's time; it is notable that the police have said very >little, but it is clear they are serious allegations that have not
    gone away. Speculation about what would happen if she is found guilty
    was fair, but it has been clarified that as she is a list MP the next
    person on the list would become a list MP. There is really nothing
    further that the Green Party can say, other than what they have, which >essentially confirms that the allegations are serious and when they
    were told of them. She has lost her portfolio responsibilities within
    the party until this is resolved. As all else is irrelevant, there is
    little more to be said. What additional information was given by other >parties when faced with allegations about an MP of similar serious
    nature? What is it that you would want any political party to say
    under these circumstances? Parliament does not sit again until 30
    January.

    Well now that Gharamen has resigned from Parliament we can draw a
    conclusion that the allegations of shoplifting have some substance.
    Gharamen has done the decent thing here and that should be
    acknowledged. I am sure more background information will now become
    public knowledge.


    --
    Crash McBash

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Mon Jan 15 23:45:22 2024
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 19:15:46 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 15 Jan 2024 06:40:51 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
    https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/133561585/police-investigating-golriz-ghahraman-allegation--this-time-in-wellington

    This one was in October and in Wellington. So an earlier time and a >>>>different place. However you dice it, it does not look good. Time to throw >>>>away the shovel and stop digging.
    Absolutely - we have Police so we don't have to do our own digging! >>>Mostly what has been dug up is opinion, political spin and ignorance -
    TV One even had the gall to seek advice from Bridget Morton - who >>>dutifully parroted the 'dirty tricks' line from Kiwiblog etc. But then >>>National and their spin doctors don;t want the police to get through
    this case too quickly - rumour and innuendo are much more exciting!

    Morton had the gall to suggest that she should be stood down from her >>>positions with the Green Party - who had already done that days ago!

    So by all means enjoy the speculation but let us remember that old >>>principle that used to be followed by New Zealand - innocent until
    proven guilty - and National need to be careful about throwing too
    many stones - one of theirs may be next . . .
    What a lot of political rubbish you do spin. Leave it alone you stupid man - >>transparent as ever.

    And the Green Party is also being transparent - you just hate that,
    don't you Tony . . .
    No I am enjoying seeing them do that for the first time in living memory, unfortunately they were too little too late but hey with their history they can be forgiven, at least by you and their other sycophants.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mutley@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Tue Jan 16 14:43:38 2024
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 19:15:46 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 15 Jan 2024 06:40:51 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
    https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/133561585/police-investigating-golriz-ghahraman-allegation--this-time-in-wellington

    This one was in October and in Wellington. So an earlier time and a >>>>different place. However you dice it, it does not look good. Time to throw >>>>away the shovel and stop digging.
    Absolutely - we have Police so we don't have to do our own digging! >>>Mostly what has been dug up is opinion, political spin and ignorance -
    TV One even had the gall to seek advice from Bridget Morton - who >>>dutifully parroted the 'dirty tricks' line from Kiwiblog etc. But then >>>National and their spin doctors don;t want the police to get through
    this case too quickly - rumour and innuendo are much more exciting!

    Morton had the gall to suggest that she should be stood down from her >>>positions with the Green Party - who had already done that days ago!

    So by all means enjoy the speculation but let us remember that old >>>principle that used to be followed by New Zealand - innocent until
    proven guilty - and National need to be careful about throwing too
    many stones - one of theirs may be next . . .
    What a lot of political rubbish you do spin. Leave it alone you stupid man - >>transparent as ever.

    And the Green Party is also being transparent - you just hate that,
    don't you Tony . . .

    She's gone https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/301040375/live-greens-coleaders-mark-sad-day-as-golriz-ghahraman-quits

    Will no doubt claim mental illness to get off the charges.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to Mutley on Tue Jan 16 01:57:25 2024
    On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 14:43:38 +1300, Mutley wrote:

    Will no doubt claim mental illness to get off the charges.

    But it’s always the ones who claim they’re *not* crazy who are actually crazy, aren’t they?

    Go on, deny that, if you’re crazy enough to do so.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BR@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jan 17 07:07:00 2024
    On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 22:22:10 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 15 Jan 2024 06:40:51 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/133561585/police-investigating-golriz-ghahraman-allegation--this-time-in-wellington

    This one was in October and in Wellington. So an earlier time and a >>different place. However you dice it, it does not look good. Time to throw >>away the shovel and stop digging.
    Absolutely - we have Police so we don't have to do our own digging!
    Mostly what has been dug up is opinion, political spin and ignorance -

    She's has pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity.

    Bill.

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
    https://www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to blah@blah.blah on Wed Jan 17 07:21:51 2024
    On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 07:07:00 +1300, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 22:22:10 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 15 Jan 2024 06:40:51 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
    https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/133561585/police-investigating-golriz-ghahraman-allegation--this-time-in-wellington

    This one was in October and in Wellington. So an earlier time and a >>>different place. However you dice it, it does not look good. Time to throw >>>away the shovel and stop digging.
    Absolutely - we have Police so we don't have to do our own digging!
    Mostly what has been dug up is opinion, political spin and ignorance -

    She's has pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity.

    Bill.

    More lies - were you responsible for the threats of violence and death
    threats as well Bill?

    From: https://www.1news.co.nz/2024/01/16/ghahraman-faced-continuous-sexual-physical-threats-shaw/
    The former human rights lawyer and Iranian refugee apologised in a
    statement around midday today, saying she had let a lot of people down
    and would take accountability for her actions. She said she had fallen
    short of expectations and mental health was a factor in her acting "in
    ways that are completely out of character".


    This afternoon, Shaw said Parliament was "obviously" a stressful place
    but Ghahraman had been "subject to pretty much continuous threats of
    sexual violence, physical violence, death threats since the day she
    was elected to parliament".

    Shaw said the party was not in contact with the police about the
    allegations and it would be inappropriate for it to be. It meant the
    party found out about further allegations as they were revealed in the
    media.

    He said Ghahraman was getting a lot of support from Green Party
    members and colleagues as well as friends outside the party, and
    medical professionals.

    Shaw said Ghahraman was not using mental ill-health as an excuse or justification for her behaviour, only as to explain it.

    See also : https://www.1news.co.nz/2024/01/16/golriz-ghahraman-quits-parliament-i-am-very-sorry/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to JohnO on Tue Jan 16 19:43:53 2024
    JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday 16 January 2024 at 12:41:59 UTC+13, Crash wrote:
    On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 09:22:31 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 08:06:57 +1300, Crash <nog...@dontbother.invalid>
    wrote:

    On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 22:22:10 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 15 Jan 2024 06:40:51 GMT, Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:


    https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/133561585/police-investigating-golriz-ghahraman-allegation--this-time-in-wellington

    This one was in October and in Wellington. So an earlier time and a
    different place. However you dice it, it does not look good. Time to
    throw
    away the shovel and stop digging.
    Absolutely - we have Police so we don't have to do our own digging!
    Mostly what has been dug up is opinion, political spin and ignorance -
    TV One even had the gall to seek advice from Bridget Morton - who
    dutifully parroted the 'dirty tricks' line from Kiwiblog etc. But then
    National and their spin doctors don;t want the police to get through
    this case too quickly - rumour and innuendo are much more exciting!

    Morton had the gall to suggest that she should be stood down from her
    positions with the Green Party - who had already done that days ago!

    So by all means enjoy the speculation but let us remember that old
    principle that used to be followed by New Zealand - innocent until
    proven guilty - and National need to be careful about throwing too
    many stones - one of theirs may be next . . .

    Rich whatever political spin you push on this, the fact is that retail
    businesses have made allegations of criminal conduct against Gharamen.
    No amount of repeating your references to 'dirty tricks' and National
    changes this.

    The subject is what Gharamen is alleged to have done. All else is
    irrelevant.
    Exactly my point - mindless speculation about the allegations is a
    waste of everyone's time; it is notable that the police have said very
    little, but it is clear they are serious allegations that have not
    gone away. Speculation about what would happen if she is found guilty
    was fair, but it has been clarified that as she is a list MP the next
    person on the list would become a list MP. There is really nothing
    further that the Green Party can say, other than what they have, which
    essentially confirms that the allegations are serious and when they
    were told of them. She has lost her portfolio responsibilities within
    the party until this is resolved. As all else is irrelevant, there is
    little more to be said. What additional information was given by other
    parties when faced with allegations about an MP of similar serious
    nature? What is it that you would want any political party to say
    under these circumstances? Parliament does not sit again until 30
    January.
    Well now that Gharamen has resigned from Parliament we can draw a
    conclusion that the allegations of shoplifting have some substance.
    Gharamen has done the decent thing here and that should be
    acknowledged. I am sure more background information will now become
    public knowledge.


    --
    Crash McBash

    Moving on, the Green leaders have some explaining to do. For a start, why was >GG still spokesperson for Justice when they knew for weeks she had allegations >of theft hanging over her? What did they do to help GG? What did they say to >Scotties management?
    It would not be the first time they tried to interfere with due process.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Tue Jan 16 19:42:57 2024
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 07:07:00 +1300, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 22:22:10 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>wrote:

    On 15 Jan 2024 06:40:51 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
    https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/133561585/police-investigating-golriz-ghahraman-allegation--this-time-in-wellington

    This one was in October and in Wellington. So an earlier time and a >>>>different place. However you dice it, it does not look good. Time to throw >>>>away the shovel and stop digging.
    Absolutely - we have Police so we don't have to do our own digging! >>>Mostly what has been dug up is opinion, political spin and ignorance -

    She's has pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity.

    Bill.

    More lies - were you responsible for the threats of violence and death >threats as well Bill?
    You nasty little worm - can you ever be civil? Don't bother to answer, we know the answer only too well.

    From: >https://www.1news.co.nz/2024/01/16/ghahraman-faced-continuous-sexual-physical-threats-shaw/
    The former human rights lawyer and Iranian refugee apologised in a
    statement around midday today, saying she had let a lot of people down
    and would take accountability for her actions. She said she had fallen
    short of expectations and mental health was a factor in her acting "in
    ways that are completely out of character".


    This afternoon, Shaw said Parliament was "obviously" a stressful place
    but Ghahraman had been "subject to pretty much continuous threats of
    sexual violence, physical violence, death threats since the day she
    was elected to parliament".

    Shaw said the party was not in contact with the police about the
    allegations and it would be inappropriate for it to be. It meant the
    party found out about further allegations as they were revealed in the
    media.

    He said Ghahraman was getting a lot of support from Green Party
    members and colleagues as well as friends outside the party, and
    medical professionals.

    Shaw said Ghahraman was not using mental ill-health as an excuse or >justification for her behaviour, only as to explain it.

    See also : >https://www.1news.co.nz/2024/01/16/golriz-ghahraman-quits-parliament-i-am-very-sorry/
    All of which is diversion and irrelevant.
    Politicians are always subject to hateful behaviour, I wish that was not true - however suddenly that is a very convenient excuse for law breaking - give us a break we are not as stupid as you. She stole, period.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Willy Nilly@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Tue Jan 16 19:57:49 2024
    On Wed, 17 Jan 2024, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >https://www.1news.co.nz/2024/01/16/ghahraman-faced-continuous-sexual-physical-threats-shaw/
    The former human rights lawyer and Iranian refugee apologised ...

    Notice how the media studiously avoids telling us where she travelled
    to over the holidays. Yes, the Green "Iranian refugee" spent the
    holidays in... Iran! The hypocricy transcends all norms, not only
    hers but the Greens, and the media which pushes their hypocritical
    narrative by all methods including omitting highly relevant facts.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mutley@21:1/5 to Willy Nilly on Wed Jan 17 12:12:34 2024
    wn@qwert.com (Willy Nilly) wrote:

    On Wed, 17 Jan 2024, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>https://www.1news.co.nz/2024/01/16/ghahraman-faced-continuous-sexual-physical-threats-shaw/
    The former human rights lawyer and Iranian refugee apologised ...

    Notice how the media studiously avoids telling us where she travelled
    to over the holidays. Yes, the Green "Iranian refugee" spent the
    holidays in... Iran! The hypocricy transcends all norms, not only
    hers but the Greens, and the media which pushes their hypocritical
    narrative by all methods including omitting highly relevant facts.

    I bet as soon as she gets charged you won't see a thing in the NZ
    media citing "it's before the courts" and it will quietly vanish

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to Mutley on Wed Jan 17 00:48:50 2024
    On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 12:12:34 +1300, Mutley wrote:

    I bet as soon as she gets charged you won't see a thing in the NZ media
    citing "it's before the courts" and it will quietly vanish

    Is there some monopoly, perhaps Government-enforced, on what constitutes
    “NZ media”?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Willy Nilly@21:1/5 to Lawrence D'Oliveiro on Wed Jan 17 02:24:48 2024
    On Wed, 17 Jan 2024, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
    Is there some monopoly, perhaps Government-enforced, on what constitutes >“NZ media”?

    You're 2 months too late for that, now it's just rancid lockstep
    leftism which badly needs to be extirpated, somehow.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)