1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. NZ.GENERAL

  • Willie Jackson vs Winston Peters

    From Crash@21:1/5 to All on Tue Dec 19 12:13:03 2023
    Looks like we have an interesting sideshow developing here, with
    Jackson deciding to stay on in Parliament to take on Winston.

    My prediction: Speaker Brownlee will have to rule fairly soon on
    whether "sunshine" is allowed in Parliament in reference to an MP.
    There might also be something of substance to come out of this.


    --
    Crash McBash

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Crash on Tue Dec 19 00:45:27 2023
    Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> wrote:
    Looks like we have an interesting sideshow developing here, with
    Jackson deciding to stay on in Parliament to take on Winston.

    My prediction: Speaker Brownlee will have to rule fairly soon on
    whether "sunshine" is allowed in Parliament in reference to an MP.
    There might also be something of substance to come out of this.


    --
    Crash McBash
    I would love it if it wasn't so serious - however I hope Jackson changes his mind and fades away into the oblivion he so richly deserves.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to lizandtony@orcon.net.nz on Tue Dec 19 15:43:10 2023
    On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 00:45:27 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> wrote:
    Looks like we have an interesting sideshow developing here, with
    Jackson deciding to stay on in Parliament to take on Winston.

    My prediction: Speaker Brownlee will have to rule fairly soon on
    whether "sunshine" is allowed in Parliament in reference to an MP.
    There might also be something of substance to come out of this.


    --
    Crash McBash
    I would love it if it wasn't so serious - however I hope Jackson changes his >mind and fades away into the oblivion he so richly deserves.

    There is nothing serious in it at all - as Crash said it is a
    sideshow, and nothing of substance has come from it at least as yet.
    Peters has been bought for 18 months - after that he will be looking
    to the next election. Jackson is not likely to fade into oblivion -
    and that could be emphasised by his responding to Peters by referring
    to him as R Hon 'twilight' Peters - and that would be appreciated by
    most members of the House!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Tue Dec 19 03:33:10 2023
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 00:45:27 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> wrote:
    Looks like we have an interesting sideshow developing here, with
    Jackson deciding to stay on in Parliament to take on Winston.

    My prediction: Speaker Brownlee will have to rule fairly soon on
    whether "sunshine" is allowed in Parliament in reference to an MP.
    There might also be something of substance to come out of this.


    --
    Crash McBash
    I would love it if it wasn't so serious - however I hope Jackson changes his >>mind and fades away into the oblivion he so richly deserves.

    There is nothing serious in it at all - as Crash said it is a
    sideshow, and nothing of substance has come from it at least as yet.
    Peters has been bought for 18 months - after that he will be looking
    to the next election. Jackson is not likely to fade into oblivion -
    and that could be emphasised by his responding to Peters by referring
    to him as R Hon 'twilight' Peters - and that would be appreciated by
    most members of the House!
    Your nonsense as usual. Peters is in, suck it up. Jackosn should go, it is an opinion, you know no different.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)